Great video! Low light performance is stunning, given it's only such a tiny sensor. BTW, I was not aware that this model can shoot UHD at 10bit 422- has the 422 been added recently? This would make this little beast an ideal travel camcorder for me, as I like grading so much.
Not bad at all. I think with the correct lighting conditions nighttime shoots will work. Some of those scenes you captured would work well in the context of a story and used a B Roll 👍 ps. I have the X2000 and I’m enjoying using it...daytime mostly.
Thanks for your message, I also like to use it for shooting during daytime, I will use hc x1500 take a video which is related to Macau and upload it later.
great footage. Is the low light quality the same between the x1500, the x2000 and the top of the line AG-CX10? I want to replace two old Canon XF300 and I need GOOD or better 1080p for sure and better low light...20x zoom would be nice...are these panny cameras worth it? thanks
I guess you don't need the answer anymore but maybe other ppl. There is no difference between this cameras relating the sensor. The 2000 has an additional SDI-Output (that the 1500 doesnt have) and has the top bar for external mics and the inbuild light. But this upper-bar/grip can be bought seperately. I bought the 1500 with the bar seperatly cause it was cheater than the 2000 and I didnt need the SDI-Ouput. The HDMI was fine for me nether the less the HDMI can give me a 4k output. The SDI only FHD. The CX10 has an additional possibility to be connected by ethernet for bigger build ups.
Two points of this machine are very fatal, namely its poor high ISO and depth of field. Of course, this is because the sensor is too small. If you don't mind, this is a good product.
@@rascoiau430 On the depth of field I can agree with you. On the ISO I would say that it does better than many other cams. However, in professional cams it is not enough to adjust the ISO / Db you have to act on all the internal sets. If adjusted well it is OK. However from your video I would not say that it is poor. It captures a lot of light even with the sensor it has.
@@azzamur Thank you for your response. I very much agree with you. This is a very good machine. Of course, I commented that the low-light performance of this camera is relatively poor, because it is my responsibility to inform everyone about the content. I agree with you. In the professional world, the ratio of the camera to the final image is not the most important. The most important thing is light. But in this part, I obviously want to test the low-light performance of the machine. It supports up to 30DB. My current 22DB has obvious particles. This is my test result.
I think the safety line is about 10dB or less, but I will make a video to respond to your question./Я думаю, что уровень безопасности составляет около 10 дБ или меньше, но я сделаю видео, чтобы ответить на ваш вопрос
Yeah might be but you forget there are more types of need. I got the BMPCC 6k, a Sony a7rII and just bought this one! Why? Electronical Zoom, small Sensor for better and faster focus on long focal lenghts. Why? Soccer games for example that I have to stream/record. A black magic hasn't even a follow focus! So down to that I could also say: For the same price you can buy a Iphone 12 256GB. Speacial needs - special products
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 71 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ทรงชัยน้อย vs รักษ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_AGPnq2p6Js/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video! Low light performance is stunning, given it's only such a tiny sensor. BTW, I was not aware that this model can shoot UHD at 10bit 422- has the 422 been added recently?
This would make this little beast an ideal travel camcorder for me, as I like grading so much.
Not bad at all. I think with the correct lighting conditions nighttime shoots will work. Some of those scenes you captured would work well in the context of a story and used a B Roll 👍
ps. I have the X2000 and I’m enjoying using it...daytime mostly.
Thanks for your message, I also like to use it for shooting during daytime, I will use hc x1500 take a video which is related to Macau and upload it later.
Where can I turn on the drs?
Can you do some 4k@60fps video test at 200 Mbps with this camcorder ????
great footage. Is the low light quality the same between the x1500, the x2000 and the top of the line AG-CX10? I want to replace two old Canon XF300 and I need GOOD or better 1080p for sure and better low light...20x zoom would be nice...are these panny cameras worth it? thanks
I guess you don't need the answer anymore but maybe other ppl. There is no difference between this cameras relating the sensor. The 2000 has an additional SDI-Output (that the 1500 doesnt have) and has the top bar for external mics and the inbuild light. But this upper-bar/grip can be bought seperately. I bought the 1500 with the bar seperatly cause it was cheater than the 2000 and I didnt need the SDI-Ouput. The HDMI was fine for me nether the less the HDMI can give me a 4k output. The SDI only FHD. The CX10 has an additional possibility to be connected by ethernet for bigger build ups.
Best test in low light. Oana good cam.
Two points of this machine are very fatal, namely its poor high ISO and depth of field. Of course, this is because the sensor is too small. If you don't mind, this is a good product.
@@rascoiau430 On the depth of field I can agree with you. On the ISO I would say that it does better than many other cams. However, in professional cams it is not enough to adjust the ISO / Db you have to act on all the internal sets. If adjusted well it is OK. However from your video I would not say that it is poor. It captures a lot of light even with the sensor it has.
@@azzamur Thank you for your response. I very much agree with you. This is a very good machine. Of course, I commented that the low-light performance of this camera is relatively poor, because it is my responsibility to inform everyone about the content. I agree with you. In the professional world, the ratio of the camera to the final image is not the most important. The most important thing is light. But in this part, I obviously want to test the low-light performance of the machine. It supports up to 30DB. My current 22DB has obvious particles. This is my test result.
Look here. Do you prefer this or the sony a7s iii at 500000 iso? th-cam.com/video/fSe8yhZ7cjw/w-d-xo.html
@@rascoiau430 Even my pana hcx1 say it is poor in low light. Then I adjusted the parameters and now it's perfect.
at what ISO settings does the video appear noise 422 - 10-8bit 420 10-8bit /при каких параметрах ИСО на видео появляется шум/
I think the safety line is about 10dB or less, but I will make a video to respond to your question./Я думаю, что уровень безопасности составляет около 10 дБ или меньше, но я сделаю видео, чтобы ответить на ваш вопрос
Это мое новое видео. th-cam.com/video/3qHJb_7UnSw/w-d-xo.html
@@rascoiau430 если возможно - сделайте видео в условиях недостаточной освещенности с разными параметрами усиления.
@@alexander-ee6ge Будьте уверены, я сделаю все возможное, чтобы ответить на связанные вопросы.
Rest assured, I will try my best to answer related questions.
for the same price you can buy the bmpcc 4k and the panny 12-35 f2.8 used
And why does he need that BM for the same price
Yeah might be but you forget there are more types of need. I got the BMPCC 6k, a Sony a7rII and just bought this one! Why? Electronical Zoom, small Sensor for better and faster focus on long focal lenghts. Why? Soccer games for example that I have to stream/record. A black magic hasn't even a follow focus! So down to that I could also say: For the same price you can buy a Iphone 12 256GB. Speacial needs - special products