America invading Middle East for no reason and destroying the countries infrastructure to the point it collapses and causes massive unrest which creates terrorist groups
The peoblem, is the Centrist solution is to just eradicate everything that's non-centrist and finally everything will be fixed. Of course, nobody wanta to hear that.
@Nazeem Yes and no, that's an excessively negative view that you're _choosing_ to latch onto. Centrism is about rationality, pragmatism and taking the best from both Left and Right ideologies. The problem is, people are too tribal and pathetic. The only thing the Cetrist can do is go postal or pray to God because they're not calling the shots. The collectivists and the corpratists are, so no wonder you think they're just fence sitters.
“Normal nihilism is cringe unlike anarcho nihilism which states if nothing really matters why do we even have a state which is kinda based”- jreg probably
Jreg actually calls anarcho nihilism cringe in "Anti-Centrism: Extreme Niche Political Ideologies (Absolutist Post-Left Hoppean Neoaccelerationism) as nihilism is essentially nothing matters which is an anti-ideology statement. The point of ideology is that things do matter, and that we should strive towards what is "right" (the meaning of that obviously varying depending on the ideology) which again exists in opposition to nihilism, which is like, "we're all fucked anyways so what's the point of doing anything."
@@silvanvanderhorst7366 maybe more like a stage in social development, going from premodern (superstition) to modern (reason) to postmodern (presumption). It expresses itself in art and bleeds over into politics etc. Postmodernism is defined by believing in things without truly apprehending the reasoning behind it; misapprehension of basic things leads to errors in judgment. that is to say postmodernists tend to believe that something is true if they believe it. The famous example of course is Jackson Pollock and his splatter art. (Look them up to see for yourself.) What makes it famous is that it's not actually good art (objectively) but postmodernists believe so because hoity-toity self-proclaimed experts say so. "It must be true because everybody else says so" fallacy. & Jackson Pollock's art was as scrambled as his brain. And yes you can objectively measure how good art is, beauty is a ratio of form-to-function. It's an art dealer racket meant to sell shoddy art to people who don't have the perception to know better. The lady who sold Pollock's paintings made millions duping unsuspecting rich morons that there was some deep meaning in the random splatter. Kind of like the guys who sold the emperor his new clothes on the old fable.
As an anarcho-neoliberalconservativemarxistfascist moderate I can confirm this is accurate. Also gotta love how everyone in the comments from every side of the political spectrum is coming together to support this video and can actually take a joke
Centrism is just taking the proven option, no matter what side that comes from, it's essentially empiricism. Has nothing to do with doing nothing and keeping the status quo
@@Narpas313 if I remember correctly it's basically that everyone should just do what they want to do for themselves and that the cares of the individual should be the pillar of morality or something like that I learned about it a long time ago
If you want to be roasted, hardline socialists will be happy to oblige. Just don't ask anyone on the right, if you don't want to spend hours explaining that **this is not what your views are**.
@@jmundi2002 not necessarily. If the only choices are between Anarcho Capitalism and Anarcho Communism then obviously the in-between is still anti-establishment. There is no such thing as a dead center for all the world's politics
@@jarrettlowery2802 obviously some form of leftist or they would have portrayed all left leaning positions as authoritarian, and one of the left leaning ideologies would have been represented by a screaming person with colorful hair. Meanwhile he would have used "based" imagery for right leaning philosophies. The fact that the compilation isn't totally unhinged means dude is at least somewhat left leaning.
Out of all of these, the Monarchism one is the most accurate lol the God part is self-explainatory (at least for western monarchies) and the Anime part being the nobility and royalty system as an elaborate form of cosplay convention lmao
@@kregy7509 Yeah, but they revere the heavens themselves, not God or a pantheon of gods. They differ in how they act and function. In a nutshell, the heavens are portrayed to be an emotionless AI that runs things, which ia different from that of God or gods.
@@kregy7509 As far as I know, they had a pantheon of gods even have their own creation myth, but they don't necessarily use them as justification of their rule the way western monarchies do. Those of the west stalk their claim on their rule by saying it as being handed down by God through the Pope. However, the enthronement of Kings and Emperors in the east (mostly China) relied _not_ on the mandate of the _gods_ but rather, _heaven's mandate_ thus the God and Anime on their side only applies to western monarchies on the most part since it's _God_ and Anime, not _the Heavens_ and Anime
@@acertainsomeone5406 yeah. Tbh I don't really know. I think there is definitely more to it then that, but then we would be arguing like this without an end. I hope you have a good day, but I need to get going to work.
@Anticommunist watch the full video, the camera pans showing the tanks are leaving the square, not entering it. The guy climbs on the tank for like a full 2 minutes and the driver gets out and talks to him then the guy walks off.
I think the "I can't read" one could have applied to Maoism just as easily as well. Many people who call themselves Maoists have either evidently never actually read Mao, or have the worst interpretation of Mao's writings ever. To the point where they say and believe the opposite of what Mao himself did. They make him out to be a lot more cringe than what he was.
as a Stalinist from Russia, I confirm, все сталинисты ездят на танках, because we are chad, while these virgin anarchists, fascists and democrats are driving their cars.
I like your thumbnail, it brings back good memories, back in a time when things were simpler and I hadn't even learn any of the words that were mentioned in this video.
As a nihilist, You believe nothing _inherently_ matters; which means that _people_ get to decide what matters. (Personally I think making sure people can live in relative safety and comfort, allowing them to pursue happiness, is what matters.)
@@emilebel6804 Exactly In all seriousness, though, the point is that postmodernism rejects the idea of objectivity and thus rationality and truth, so a postmodern view of this little girl’s decision to call these geese “chickens” could very well be affirmative of said decision, since whether or not these beings are truly chickens is only a matter of perspective by postmodern logic.
@@sammillsy i mean when you switch the words goose and chicken for the actual animals, nothing would technically change since that's how the names got made in the first place (kinda) so the question should rather be "why would you do that?"
@@patryknowicki4536 one is a medival ideology that favored existence of the guild systems (its heavily tied to catholic theology) and some other stuffs. The other ideology is a modern one (the dominantly practiced ideology in the US and many other developed countries) and tied to neoliberalism/neoconservatism. So the distinction that OP tried to make is valid.
Pretty much a good video, though the free healthcare part was weird, pretty sure most people agree that taxes should be used for community of people, I don't think I have ever met anyone political who thinks free/cheap healthcare is bad (unless I somehow got lucky and never met those people).
Seems safe to say you're not from the United States. Plenty here are against universal healthcare("I shouldn't have to pay for other people's care"), and only support competitive free market methods to lower costs.
@@EternalDahaka Yikes! Even the massive conservatives who are crazy with keeping the nation "migrant free" in German would be appaled at the thought of not getting essential services in exchange for their taxes that they literally paid their money for. I definitely thought it was a no brainer, you pay government money, they give you the most essential service you need to live and sustain a healthy job for. I could not for my life think now anyone would deliberately throw themselves into a corner and think it is good because they wouldn't even be able to obtain money through their jobs without healthcare.
Eh I think that particular speech by HRC is a better demonstration of neoconservatism than anything. And yeah you can be a neoliberal (domestic policy) and neocon (mostly foreign policy)
The only diff between neocons and neolibs is which spheres they're passive and aggressive in. The demented civic religion being foisted on european/colonial civilization: neolibs = aggressive, neocons = comparatively more passive. Foreign hawkishness (especially if its in the interests of a certain state in the levant) is aggressive for neocons and a kind of passive and twisted posturing for neolibs. No real difference aside from that. Neocons basically came out of schismatic Trotskyists anyway lol
I think this portrays liberals well. They want to believe America is a great country that does virtuous things, and even when America does bad they had good intentions. Question any liberal about Obama's immigration policy or the Libyan war, or under Clinton the Crime Bill, NAFTA or Iraq sanctions, and libs will make excuses about how they meant well, there's hard choices to be made, moderation, compromise, yadda yadda, yet American liberal democracy is still the best system - esp when lead by Democrats!
I heard a joke before that if you put 3 Trotskyists in the same room to form a party, you end up with 4 different party formations
That's a good one!
They say that about Conservatives too
As an an-com I can confirm ahaha 😂
Omg lol
And somehow they end up with ice picks in their heads
"I'm in a tank and you're not" pretty solid argument if you ask me.
That is Stalinism
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
@@Zaroni_ Stalin was pretty based
I read this at the exact same time it played in the video lol
Tankies 🇨🇳
"America is great...because America is good."
*Squidward smashing his head into cash register*
America invading Middle East for no reason and destroying the countries infrastructure to the point it collapses and causes massive unrest which creates terrorist groups
@somestranger it better be or you will end up like the last guy they just found.
@@wrayday7149 *prison camera mysteriously stops working*
I never really look at the idiot on stage, I much more focus on the huge crowd of massive idiots who got suckered into voting for them.
Truly says a lot about the plight of the average working-class adult
Centrist:"you're wrong, you're wrong, all of you are wrong"
The rest:"ok, so how about you offer a solution"
Centrist:"no" *walks off*
sigma centrist grindset
you don't get it
walking off *is* the solution
Pretty much.
The peoblem, is the Centrist solution is to just eradicate everything that's non-centrist and finally everything will be fixed.
Of course, nobody wanta to hear that.
@Nazeem Yes and no, that's an excessively negative view that you're _choosing_ to latch onto. Centrism is about rationality, pragmatism and taking the best from both Left and Right ideologies.
The problem is, people are too tribal and pathetic. The only thing the Cetrist can do is go postal or pray to God because they're not calling the shots. The collectivists and the corpratists are, so no wonder you think they're just fence sitters.
The best way to insult no one is to insult everyone. Equality at its finest.
This can only mean, Liz Flaherty is a Communist!
Sounds like communism to me
This is why Matt Stone and Trey Parker are still making their TV show.
Pregitous equality as one wise man said.
Exactly
“Normal nihilism is cringe unlike anarcho nihilism which states if nothing really matters why do we even have a state which is kinda based”- jreg probably
Anarcho nilhism is based
@@johnmemes6447
Based upon stupidity, maybe.
Jreg actually calls anarcho nihilism cringe in "Anti-Centrism: Extreme Niche Political Ideologies (Absolutist Post-Left Hoppean Neoaccelerationism) as nihilism is essentially nothing matters which is an anti-ideology statement. The point of ideology is that things do matter, and that we should strive towards what is "right" (the meaning of that obviously varying depending on the ideology) which again exists in opposition to nihilism, which is like, "we're all fucked anyways so what's the point of doing anything."
anarcho nihilism, optimistic nihilism, aburdism, why are people keep popularizing philosophies that all say the same thing. 😭
@@gaiusjuliuscaesar9902 based and redpilled
I love how he makes fun of every ideology so that everyone can laugh
Most people don’t follow an ideology. I hope.
She I think
@@augth Gamerism
@@augth this thought is the one thing that keeps me sane
Tbf most people don’t really have an ideology
That was the best portrayal of postmodernism I’ve ever seen
This is a pipe.
This is a comment.
But isn't postmodernism an art style from the 20th century and not a political ideology?
@@silvanvanderhorst7366 Postmodernism is an interpretive theory that can be applied to basically anything, including both the arts and politics.
@@silvanvanderhorst7366 maybe more like a stage in social development, going from premodern (superstition) to modern (reason) to postmodern (presumption).
It expresses itself in art and bleeds over into politics etc.
Postmodernism is defined by believing in things without truly apprehending the reasoning behind it; misapprehension of basic things leads to errors in judgment. that is to say postmodernists tend to believe that something is true if they believe it.
The famous example of course is Jackson Pollock and his splatter art. (Look them up to see for yourself.)
What makes it famous is that it's not actually good art (objectively) but postmodernists believe so because hoity-toity self-proclaimed experts say so. "It must be true because everybody else says so" fallacy.
& Jackson Pollock's art was as scrambled as his brain.
And yes you can objectively measure how good art is, beauty is a ratio of form-to-function.
It's an art dealer racket meant to sell shoddy art to people who don't have the perception to know better.
The lady who sold Pollock's paintings made millions duping unsuspecting rich morons that there was some deep meaning in the random splatter.
Kind of like the guys who sold the emperor his new clothes on the old fable.
The Anarcho-Syndicalist Commune is still one of my favourite bits ever. Thank god for Monty Python
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
As an anarcho-neoliberalconservativemarxistfascist moderate I can confirm this is accurate.
Also gotta love how everyone in the comments from every side of the political spectrum is coming together to support this video and can actually take a joke
An*
canceled.
@@danieldees9686 who's canceled?
@@shmoombletonii nobody. That was also a joke.
@@danieldees9686 okay then
Highly informative, thank you very much
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
This is completely accurate. We need to show this to kids in school.
Except its not
@@miceltusav88 it literally is
@@Joee1530 feminism?
YOU HAVE TWO COWS
No it isn’t lol since when Egoism is political ideology lol
As an anarcho-syndicalist I can confirm that I am indeed a peasant.
you must be poor 😂
as an ancap i can confirm like filth
@@swamp5021 thats the joke, yes
Be Quiet, I order You To Be Quiet
Supreme executive power comes from a mandate of the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
As a centrist, the centrism bit is a bit 50/50.
ok
centrism is nothing but the status quo
@@Javier-rl1of no
@@Javier-rl1of 🤓🤓🤓
Centrism is just taking the proven option, no matter what side that comes from, it's essentially empiricism. Has nothing to do with doing nothing and keeping the status quo
Most often, political parody has to have a few, *mandatory* , Monty Python clips. Thats how politics go.
Because they knew how to do it right.
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
as a Trotskyist, i agree with the precise representation of Trotskyism.
As a trotskyist, i agree with your agreement
As a Marxist I wish you two comrades a good day
Please don't be a trot
The only truth to it is that Trotskyist argue with every Communist group to the point they might as well have a 95th international.
@@tukatl But the Troskyists betrayed Marxism!!
I love that you included Egoism, never see people mention it
Ah yes, Objectivism that hates money
What’s egoism?
@@Narpas313 I just know that it's not ideology LOL
@@Narpas313 if I remember correctly it's basically that everyone should just do what they want to do for themselves and that the cares of the individual should be the pillar of morality or something like that I learned about it a long time ago
@@Narpas313 1 step up from nihilism and one step down from absurdism.
Anti-Centrism isn't included because it's too perfect to be caricatured
anti-leftism is great tho
@@ASSIMO nah anti fascism is better
@@tukatl no
@@ASSIMO How can being against mass slaughter be a bad thing?
@@estenbakken8180 You mean the Russian revolution? Joseph Stalin? Cultural Revolution? Khmer Rogue?
“But I just want people to have healthcare, honey.”
That was the most sane presentation of all the ideologies, despite her wearing a costume. 👏 Bravo!
funny thing is she was not wearing a costume. that's her acual clothing xD
@@dinamosflams Really? It looks so much like a WWII-era sailor’s uniform.
And then she became a tradcath. How sad
@@jarrettlowery2802 who is she?
@@gregbagel791 dasha nekrasova
As an ancom I can confirm that I cannot read
As an ancom i have no idea what you just said
Supersts I would second everything here if I knew what we were talking about
As a libertarian I can conform you can't read
What are these strange symbols
I agree, there's a reason we have free screen readers and audio books of the important texts.
There's two types of centrism:
Moderate centrism: things are gonna be fine eventually
Radical centrism: we can't change anything anyway so why bother
See I'm more on the radical side
literally neither of those are even close to centrism lmao. The second one is just nihilism.
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
3:10 Im a monarchist, can confirm this is accurate
So you have god on your side, what happens if your opponent is atheist?
@@tukatl Well they won't be coming to our Kingdom of Heaven.
@@OnlyGrafting not going to heaven is based. Hell has drugs and gay sex
He’ll be converted, occasionally… or else…
@@tukatl if only they could wish their problems away
As a social democrat im kinda disapointed that we didn t get roasted as much as the others...
Social Democracy makes far too much sense to get roasted that hard.
I tried to think of a good roast, but kept agreeing with all the espoused principles. So as usual, we social dems never get to have any fun.
Lol
play boring games, win boring prizes
If you want to be roasted, hardline socialists will be happy to oblige. Just don't ask anyone on the right, if you don't want to spend hours explaining that **this is not what your views are**.
I sense a Monty Python bias.
Also, AnSynd.
Congratulations! You get
✧༺♥༻∞ second coolest ideology award ∞༺♥༻✧
@@lizflaherty1374 May I ask what the coolest is?
@@Hawkatana anarcho-communism of course! ( I recommend testing it in minecraft )
Syndie gang UwU
@@Hawkatana its transhuminst anarcho primitivism
You included soulism.
I belive that you included soulism.
YOU INCLUDED SOULISM.
soulism is at 3:32, outside of the video's time frame beacuase it has transcended it
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
As a centrist (I think), that's a perfect summary. Trying to pretend things are fine as everybody and everything tear themselves and the world apart.
Centrist= stablishment
@@jmundi2002 not necessarily. If the only choices are between Anarcho Capitalism and Anarcho Communism then obviously the in-between is still anti-establishment. There is no such thing as a dead center for all the world's politics
@@Myreactionwhen_80085 literally most of the world's parties are a dead center for the world's politics
@@jmundi2002 that's impossible. You wouldn't say that if you knew anything about the political spectrum
@@Myreactionwhen_80085 most western countries's parties are socialdemocracies so
I love how obvious this makes the political leanings of whoever made it
Can't wait for this guy to then say "I'm centrist btw" as an excuse.
Really? I have no idea.
@@baileyharrison1030 he's.... a social democrat
@@hassanmian4104 he said in another comment that he's not a socdem so idk what he is
@@jarrettlowery2802 obviously some form of leftist or they would have portrayed all left leaning positions as authoritarian, and one of the left leaning ideologies would have been represented by a screaming person with colorful hair. Meanwhile he would have used "based" imagery for right leaning philosophies. The fact that the compilation isn't totally unhinged means dude is at least somewhat left leaning.
Out of all of these, the Monarchism one is the most accurate lol the God part is self-explainatory (at least for western monarchies) and the Anime part being the nobility and royalty system as an elaborate form of cosplay convention lmao
what do you mean western monarchies? every monarchy used it at least once. China had mandate of heaven, I think, for it's emperors.
@@kregy7509 Yeah, but they revere the heavens themselves, not God or a pantheon of gods. They differ in how they act and function. In a nutshell, the heavens are portrayed to be an emotionless AI that runs things, which ia different from that of God or gods.
@@acertainsomeone5406 but isn't there the whole divine bureaucracy and actual gods? There are gods that they worshiped or revered.
@@kregy7509 As far as I know, they had a pantheon of gods even have their own creation myth, but they don't necessarily use them as justification of their rule the way western monarchies do. Those of the west stalk their claim on their rule by saying it as being handed down by God through the Pope. However, the enthronement of Kings and Emperors in the east (mostly China) relied _not_ on the mandate of the _gods_ but rather, _heaven's mandate_ thus the God and Anime on their side only applies to western monarchies on the most part since it's _God_ and Anime, not _the Heavens_ and Anime
@@acertainsomeone5406 yeah. Tbh I don't really know. I think there is definitely more to it then that, but then we would be arguing like this without an end. I hope you have a good day, but I need to get going to work.
This taught me that there's more political ideologies than I thought.
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
You're in for a long journey
I already foresee some people unironically refering to this video as the legitimate sourse of information about political ideologies
What you mean hilary clinton saying america is great because america is good really shows the complexicity of liberalism and all it's flaws.
What's up, I'm Jared, I'm 19, and I never f*ken learned how to assemble a coherent political ideology.
Finally, it's here :
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
@@archdornan4665 oh no it aint
The Neoliberalism one is spot on
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
As a long time member of the libertarian party, I can confirm this video is indeed accurate.
Ayo it’s Mises Caucus time now buddy, we goin places
@@andrewternet8370 join the Classical Liberal caucus or you're a dirty statist
You’re a libertarian? I wonder what your opinion on the age of consent is…
@@NoNo47668 Senor I am anarcho-monarchist
@@NoNo47668 children are extensions of their parents and can not consent
Social democracy wasn't a strawman like the rest of these. This video was clearly biased
I happen to despise social democrats
“It’s good because socialism plus democracy is good.”
@@IMP_ROM do you know what social democracy is?
@@user-ls9ic5vr1g Yes. Why?
@@IMP_ROM cause what your describing is democratic socialism there's a big difference
This perfectly explains why I haven’t found a political ideology I can really subscribe to.
as a (basically) centralist i agree with how i was represented
2:33 when politics get brought up
Omg this is perfect. Need more of this haha
The centrism one is spot on!
So you don't really know what centrism is then?
@@rorybessell8280 bro she correct
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
the corporatism conveyed in the video more accurately represent corporatocracy, corporatism is a completely different thing
The Judean Peoples' Front never gets old.
As a tankie myself I can confirm we ride in tanks and refuse to get out of said tanks when asked
And if there’s someone in the way of the tank holding a funny sign?
@@tukatl Never happened.
Fellow tankie, will second this
@Anticommunist watch the full video, the camera pans showing the tanks are leaving the square, not entering it. The guy climbs on the tank for like a full 2 minutes and the driver gets out and talks to him then the guy walks off.
@@mfelix3511 Hahaha Stalinists will believe any old horseshit to justify Tiannemen square
"they make the honey we make the money" lmfao
Underrated video if I ever saw won
*one
Neoliberalism is so accurate
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
as an anarchist, the monty python explanation is surprisingly okay by media standards
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
0:27 The clip of the ant saying "It's the workers who control the means of production" could also have worked here
I think the "I can't read" one could have applied to Maoism just as easily as well. Many people who call themselves Maoists have either evidently never actually read Mao, or have the worst interpretation of Mao's writings ever. To the point where they say and believe the opposite of what Mao himself did. They make him out to be a lot more cringe than what he was.
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
The NeoLiberalism one got me laughing my fucking ass off, this was beautiful
I have no idea what any of these are, I thought I knew some of them but now I'm back to the drawing board.
The amount of comedy here is GOLD xD
As a stalinist can confirm that we are always in tanks while others are not
as a Stalinist from Russia, I confirm, все сталинисты ездят на танках, because we are chad, while these virgin anarchists, fascists and democrats are driving their cars.
Keep your tanks, give me mig-15
I'd say the better quote for liberalism is "America is great because individuality is good"
I like your thumbnail, it brings back good memories, back in a time when things were simpler and I hadn't even learn any of the words that were mentioned in this video.
0:50 Absolutely correct.
As a nihilist, You believe nothing _inherently_ matters; which means that _people_ get to decide what matters.
(Personally I think making sure people can live in relative safety and comfort, allowing them to pursue happiness, is what matters.)
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
can somebody tell me where is that video with the bear playing piano from? Please, i just... need it
Where is that video of the bear piano player and Hitler from?
Anarcho-syndicalism had me dying 💀 this is so accurate
Finally, it's here :
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
The neoconservatism one killed me (I was on the bomb)
i love how you can tell exactly what the maker's ideology is
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
Love that neocons and regular cons are basically the same just different ages and different levels of edge
I mean, there is a little bit of truth in each ideology, when it's not entirely true
That Post-modernism representation 👌
didn't get it tho
@@emilebel6804 Exactly
In all seriousness, though, the point is that postmodernism rejects the idea of objectivity and thus rationality and truth, so a postmodern view of this little girl’s decision to call these geese “chickens” could very well be affirmative of said decision, since whether or not these beings are truly chickens is only a matter of perspective by postmodern logic.
@@sammillsy Oooooh ok got it, thanks !
Post modernism is just subjective reletivist drisil. But sometimes, it can make interesting Art........ Sometimes.
@@sammillsy i mean when you switch the words goose and chicken for the actual animals, nothing would technically change since that's how the names got made in the first place (kinda) so the question should rather be "why would you do that?"
I appreciate the wide variety of sources for the Clips
As a liberal myself, can confirm this is accurate
I am honestly the conservative and the fascist in this one regarding representation on which ones represented me the most as an American citizen.
Revolt against the modern world
@@MedsieLovr well I do work in an imperialist movement.
Stalinism: “you’re not my dad”
“I’m in a tank and you’re not,” would be a better fit for Might-Makes-Right.
As a Stalinist, I think it was purely having to do with the tanks. Since we are called tankies.
The first Hillary one reminded me of Lois griffin's 911 bad speech
I laughed hard in post modernism
As a Centrist, I think this is accurate
I love to set my room on fire and drink some coffee
Yes that much is clear.
As an ex-monarchist, the monarchist one is completely true.
Please do not Confuse Corporativism with Corporatocracy, two complete different Ideologies.
don't forget about Corporacy and Corporationism!
Based man
@@patryknowicki4536 one is a medival ideology that favored existence of the guild systems (its heavily tied to catholic theology) and some other stuffs. The other ideology is a modern one (the dominantly practiced ideology in the US and many other developed countries) and tied to neoliberalism/neoconservatism.
So the distinction that OP tried to make is valid.
🤓
@@XZ1. mad?
Jreg is shaking in his boots
That's how I imagine modern monarchists
Centrism is painfully relatable
1:01 Guys I have a theory:
*MatPat intro plays.
William Afton from FNAF was a feminist all this time.
As a monarchist, I can say ours is 100 percent accurate.
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
This was surprisingly good!
Thank! This is exactly what I have been looking for. Now I am Vindicated! YES! ViNDiCaTeD!
I appreciate the Pink Flamingos reference.
Had me laughing so much I fell out of my tank
That’s not corporatism that should be corporatocracy. Corporatism was the economic system fascism adopted btw.
what is the anarcho-capitalism clip from?
I love how most of the clips are Monty python
Anarcho capitalism made me laugh way too hard
Love how you made fun of everyone! I'm not jared, 19 - but I can confirm I scream "Help Help I'm Being Repressed!"
why is this video popping up in everyone’s recommended NOW
good luck on your channel!
I thought the Monarchy one was going to cut off right after he said "God" hahaha
Gotta respect the Mount&Blade scene
(Btw,as a representative of the Monarchist community, I fully agree on how we are portrayed in this masterpiece)
Finally, it's here:
th-cam.com/video/saiDrx06-fI/w-d-xo.html
This is funny because it makes fun of everyone, perfectly balanced as all things should be, also the amount of Monty python memes makes it even better
I've learnt more from this video than GCSE history
Pretty much a good video, though the free healthcare part was weird, pretty sure most people agree that taxes should be used for community of people, I don't think I have ever met anyone political who thinks free/cheap healthcare is bad (unless I somehow got lucky and never met those people).
Seems safe to say you're not from the United States. Plenty here are against universal healthcare("I shouldn't have to pay for other people's care"), and only support competitive free market methods to lower costs.
@@EternalDahaka Yikes! Even the massive conservatives who are crazy with keeping the nation "migrant free" in German would be appaled at the thought of not getting essential services in exchange for their taxes that they literally paid their money for.
I definitely thought it was a no brainer, you pay government money, they give you the most essential service you need to live and sustain a healthy job for. I could not for my life think now anyone would deliberately throw themselves into a corner and think it is good because they wouldn't even be able to obtain money through their jobs without healthcare.
I didn't realize I was a conservative until this video.
What do you believe In?
@@MrCrystal09 0:10 sums it up.
Kill filthy rat bastard commies.
What show is Platformism? It looks like one of those Disney Channel sitcoms but I have no idea which one
Wizards of Waverly place?
@@drilltotheheavens1695 that’s what I figured but I just wanted to be sure
I just saved it to my all time favs playlist thanks internet
3:00 Best game ever made btw
What is it called bro, looks fun asf
@@blackchrysler Mount & Blade Warband, there's also a sequel called "Mount & Blade Bannerlord"
Eh I think that particular speech by HRC is a better demonstration of neoconservatism than anything. And yeah you can be a neoliberal (domestic policy) and neocon (mostly foreign policy)
The only diff between neocons and neolibs is which spheres they're passive and aggressive in.
The demented civic religion being foisted on european/colonial civilization: neolibs = aggressive, neocons = comparatively more passive.
Foreign hawkishness (especially if its in the interests of a certain state in the levant) is aggressive for neocons and a kind of passive and twisted posturing for neolibs.
No real difference aside from that. Neocons basically came out of schismatic Trotskyists anyway lol
I think this portrays liberals well. They want to believe America is a great country that does virtuous things, and even when America does bad they had good intentions.
Question any liberal about Obama's immigration policy or the Libyan war, or under Clinton the Crime Bill, NAFTA or Iraq sanctions, and libs will make excuses about how they meant well, there's hard choices to be made, moderation, compromise, yadda yadda, yet American liberal democracy is still the best system - esp when lead by Democrats!
as an ancom I have absolutely no idea what you said in this video
Does anyone know where 1:30 is from? I'm cackling