I can save you guys money. No need to buy the book. How do you handle police encounters? Simple. Never talk to police. Avoid encounters whenever possible. Video record, comply, and sue them afterwards if they violate your rights, and they likely will.
They should not have the option to mute the body Cam there needs to be a full record of everything going on at that time that also stops them from doing scandalous shit too
I wish we could this this passed into federal law as 99.9% of Americans agree. I think the only people who are opposed are those employed in law enforcement.
@deannanace8935 - as a leo, i could care less if you pass or not.I don't know how officers are able to mute. I've had three different body cams and I can't do that. All I have is one button to turn on and off the camera itself and a button to tag the videos. Our policy is it has to be on every time we encounter the public. We get wrote up if we don't. If we didn't capture something on video thata vital because we didnt hit record, we would be fired. If we were found to have done it on purpose, we would be charged for suppression of evidence and fired. The problem you're going to have is the way our constitution is set up.The federal government is not supposed to make blanketed laws like that.Each state's on their own. The real problem is these officers in this video, along with all the others in these channels are idiots, but they don't represent all of us, contrary to popular belief.
He was too cooperative. I wouldn't try to give any details about my sibling's business situation. Any contradiction could be used against my sibling, as well as other details that I don't know would be a legal issue.
But, as the female officer claimed he was " not doing anything we ask..." Except, you know, answering virtually every quistion for almost ten minutes. Only an authoritarian @sshole thinks that answering 20 questions , but not #21 is " not doing anything we ask ".
When the body cameras get muted is when the conspiracy begins. Body cameras should not have a mute button. If there is a concern about releasing confidential information, they can legally have that information censored by law. The group sessions by the police are sometimes called "the Piggy Huddle".
“Why do you guys hate us? Comply little a good little citizen to whatever we want to do and let us take taxpayer money to pay off our screwups and don’t forget to never ever ever even pretend to hurt our egos and we’ll get along great”
They went to cuff him as soon as he said he wanted to record! That’s a first amendment violation too! This whole, “We got a call, so…..” or “We’re here lawfully, so…..” stuff HAS to stop!
On paper what LEOs often do is not just a violation of policy, they are actual crimes, but then again is a crime really a crime if DAs refuse to prosecute? People keep talking about ending qualified immunity, how about forcing DAs to press charges when LEOs break the law.
Not to mention, "That's not how that works." That's *exactly* how it works! You ask for it voluntarily, I'll decline. You demand under threat of arrest, I'll surrender it and file a complaint later.
These two cops are under investigation for planting drugs, stealing his money and assault, the women cop is currently being investigated for drug felony and the other cop has previous for drug planting and violence against children the case is pending
To he fair to the cop, maybe he had been watching the film, The Fugitive, If they had just arrested the man with the Prosthetic limb in that movie, it would have been a much shorter film
Removing his leg and putting it in the trunk is a blatant violation of the ADA. Also these officers must realize that they cant just grab someone with a prosthesis and spin them around. There is a greatly reduced aspect of rotational stability in that type of prosthetic with a suspension sleeve and trying to forcefully turn someone will just rip the leg right out of the socket which is exactly what we see happens. Imagineif a police officer came up to a motorcyclist and grabbed his helmet and ripped it around sideways and yanked it off! Can you imagine the outcry this would generate? This is exactly what happens to someone wearing a prosthesis! You can just rip around without either risk damaging the tissues of the residual limb and or the knee joint itself which is partially contained in the socket. Being secure in your person includes your prosthesis. This case should be taken up and brought to court by an advocacy group to highlight the injustice shown here to disabled people!
Can confirm. I played tackle football with a friend that had a prosthetic. It was coed, not high impact, but we still tackled. He went down awkwardly on a play and had to have surgery to repair the stump.
I've seen cops remove arrestees glasses all the time. And btw, there's a huge difference between cops confiscating an arrestee's helmet and confiscating his or her prosthetic limbs. Prosthetics are by definition medically necessary, helmets aren't.
Qualified immunity. Unless there is a court case already ruled on that SPECIFICALLY has a prosthetic leg being placed in the trunk of a car then theres nothing that can be done. If there was a similar case but it was a prosthetic arm and not leg it won't count because its not the exact ruling. Thats how qualified immunity works. The specifics need to be specific to whats been ruled on.
@@betterthanmost9549Unfortunately for these tyrants and boot lickers sticking up for them. The federal rules that there doesn’t have to be an existing case anymore. The only requirement is now. That a reasonable person would know what they were doing is wrong
As a former officer, I am now ashamed I ever was associated after watching tyrannical, poorly trained police impersonators like these. I truly hope this individual files a law suit. 😡Is there a go fund me?
There’s a city in ca called merced. A cop there was arrested for robbing a citizen. A females deputy sheriff in same county was found in bed with a convicted gang member by the probation dept. conducting a surprise visit early one morning. A deputy chief of police in a city called fresno was arrested by fbi for facilitation and profiting from distribution of drxxugs in his own city. Ofcourse we all know Henry Chapman 15 yr sworn officer of CMPD charlotte arrested for stealing $900 from an arrestee in his custody. And guess what- he was caught by the arrestee in handcuffs while his fellow cops stood there and did not do a thing to assist the arrestee. You probably have heard of Matthew Krueger of DFWPD. He’s known as Freddy Kreuger in the streets of Fort Worth. He is known for hurting people. His last victim was a 95lb 65 year old woman that he planted into concrete pavement head first breaking numerous facial bones and ribs and putting her in hospital in a coma. Police unions chiefs hold defacto power over police chiefs in many places. List goes on and on. It’s no wonder that people in general and specially people on lower socioeconomic side have no trust in police any more. They used run around telling us they were heroes but when cameras came along the truth came out.
"as you can see I have no toes" "nobody cares" and "Under threat of arrest I will ID, if you're not gonna arrest I will refuse" "that's not how that works"......I am speechless.....
I get you're special Ed, so I'll keep it basic. They were going to arrest him if he didn't talk or if he didn't ID himself. Hopefully your parents can limit your ability to go online. @@montezuma6962
I don't think he would have run the plates. Too much work and then he doesn't even get to escalate and push a 60 year old around. TBH I would rather cops ran plates and find other available information as part of their investigation rather than always escalating.
The purpose of the body camera is to provide an unbiased and independent witness to a situation. Why do police officers have the ability to hide or preemptively destroy evidence?
Because the reality is, those cameras are nothing more than a scarlet letter. They are there to present the illusion of compliance, and transparency, when in actuality they are not feared by LE. The Police Unions fought tooth & nail to prevent their people from having to wear those BWC's, anyone with half a brain in their head knows exactly why. There is also another false premise that people have not yet come to grips with, that is the "good faith" doctrine that goes along with any degree of agency, (meaning power granted to an individual or organization by the people of a community, or society in general). Any and all miscalculations can be viewed as such, because of that "good faith" fallacy. All and all those cameras were a concession that LE and their unions had to accept, because of the loss of trust in that "good faith" ideal.
I agree it should be studied. It’s possible that officers are confusing department policy for law, but that makes you question why aren’t department policies made to be compatible with law?
That is a civil issue that is people versus people. If it was we wouldn’t have to watch a video of a old man being abused if it wasn’t for the police’s actions this would’ve never happened you’re trying to justify as if the owner caused this in somewhere someway, he could be just as good as a man as the old man in the video police are meant to mediate not make things worse
The 4th amendment doesn’t allow them to require ID for their reports. It’s like crack to them, that’s the best analogy. Why was it so important? The brother who was apparently in charge was on the property!
It's primitive psychology Identifying yourself is done by lesser or lowers. They need to tell you who they are because they aren't important Nobility never needed to introduce themselves because they were already known In a Cop's mind, they are a Duke, a Baron, a Warlord. To have some random person not identify themselves challenges their authority
@meonkrishnanan5920 you're not wrong. It's definitely an attempt to assert dominance. Police have traditionally been trained to maintain active control of every situation, even if the circumstances don't warrant it. Add some aggressive Social Identity Theory and you've got modern law enforcement culture. It's all about asserting control and dominance.
These cops have mastered the art of speaking in circles ... Cop: Can I have your ID? Man: Under threat of arrest, I'll provide it. Cop: We're not threatening to arrest you. Man: OK. I'm not going to provide it. Cop: Turn around and put your hands behind your back. Man: OK -- if you're gonna arrest me, I'll give you my ID. Cop: That's not how it works. Huh? Can someone please explain in what world this makes any shred of sense?
When you're used to attacking people and charging THEM with assault, you become pretty narcissistic and blame all of your mistakes and failures on the other person. Fairness and what is just doesn't come into play, it's what you want at that point.
The police officer asks multiple times if he had an ID four or five times the citizen says yes. Of this was re erased the police would use that to say he was intoxicated because he keeps asking for ID multiple times.
And this is why police should be REQUIRED to ARTICULATE their RAS to the suspect before being able to COMPEL ID. How am I supposed to know if I legally have to surrender my ID without this information being relayed?
In this case it's even worse because he clarified that they were just asking and not demanding and he was told that they were asking. After they said they would arrest him he complained and then offered to give them his ID. These cops have a dangerous level of ego.
That boggles my mind. In England, Police must identify themselves and inform one of the reasonable articulated suspicion of a crime they have before they exercise the powers granted by their Public Office. In America it seems ‘put your hands behind your back’ means ‘you are under arrest’. Outrageous 👍🏻
Mr. Bailey was apparently guilty of obstructing his arrest by agreeing to provide his ID. Some of the most bizarre rationale I've ever seen by a "cop". "If you comply with our (unlawful) demands, you will be arrested for preventing us from arresting you."
As a disabled guy myself I can only imagine how humiliating and degrading it would be to have something you need to get around seized. I know this guy lives far from Florida but I hope he pushes back against these cops
The cop should be fired immediately. If you don't know your job, you lose it just like I would. If at my job is not that hard to figure this out. Why do cops keep making this stupid ass mistake? Bad training on their part
No it's not bad training. It's lack of accountability. Between qualified immunity and tax payers footing the bill, the worst consequence they suffer is resigning and then moving to another department or paid vacations.
They are holding him down like he is a flight risk, that just shows the level of power trip. Don't even have the time to realize the gravity of the situation
At 10 minutes in, I have come to the conclusion that this cop isn't even listening. I'm not sure what he's doing with his limited mental capacity, but he sure af ain't listening to the brother explain the situation.
The fella didn't have the poor mental bandwidth to actually have empathy to listen to our guys story, probably one of them out of the district cops that doesn't care about the neighborhood or social impact of his job.
And then Squeaky shows up at 11:00 with the same ol' chant, "Do you have your ID on you, boss?" What's this "boss?" "I already told Fruit Loop here that I'm not giving him my ID, and I'm not giving it to you, Sparky, or whatever your name."
It's common knowledge that if you attempt to exercise your rights, then law enforcement officials have the right to violate those rights. That's how the justice system works.
วันที่ผ่านมา +1
This cop is arrogant and a clear dangerous threat to society
Leos want your ID to research it in the *NCIC* and *share* it with local, state, feds, EffBeeEye, and tribal agencies. If you don't have to, don't give it up. Research the laws in your state. Know your rights. 🖤
This kind of behavior is pretty much normalized at this point. We've pretty much accepted that law enforcement officials will violate the Constitution, and simply pay out settlements.
“You are going to call in for any warrants.” - That’s not what we do. (That is exactly what you are going to do). These officers escalated this whole thing because they immediately assumed he was a sovcit. The elderly man explained in precise detail what the situation was, and the officer didn’t listen to any of it. He wasn’t even the lessee. No empathy, unprofessional, and a disgrase. I hope that the elderly man sues these officers and this department. This is heartbreaking and they need to be held accountable for what they did.
The officers thinking he's SovCit while the dude repeatedly referenced and quoted his lawyer is top tier brain damage. A SovCit would NEVER have a lawyer and the cop didn't put that together, what an absolute waste of resources
Sir, these police officers should be held accountable for that. If they do that and other police officers see this, they won't try that nonsense again.
Mamy ats unaware and don't learn that until it happens to them. Or they have small town cops where they are really good because everyone knows them and treating people like that would not go over well.
@@craftsandstuff3349 varies town to town. Ours were very good people. Only complaint we had was they were e tremley strict about speeding in residential to the point they'll ticket eachother for it. Granted when I say small I'm referring to 5k or less people. Typically the larger the city, the more room for corruption.
If there’s one thing I’ve gathered from countless bodycams it’s that your rights only matter in a court of law & not at any time or place outside in public. Unless you find a cop who’s patient & knowledgeable otherwise they will shake you down & arrest you if needed to get what they want. It boils your blood to see it happen so many times bc it’s systemic
Unfortunately, the courts have even said people must take steps to invoke their rights in the field to be able to assert them in court. You can't just remain silent or say, "I don't answer questions," you have to clearly invoke the 5th amendment. And if you utter one word after speaking, you have to invoke again because by speaking, you forfeited the right.
The only criminals on scene were wearing uniforms, being condescending, escalating and attacking innocent people.. why do they do it!.. because they get away with their crimes
Don’t ever talk to police even if you think it’s just banter… it’s not you can’t have a friendly conversation, they are always looking for something to arrest you for.
@@jacky5768 UK is exactly the same tho, must be why they understand our laws so well. "In the UK, a police officer can only demand your ID if they have a reasonable suspicion that you are involved in a crime or are committing an offence, particularly related to anti-social behaviour, and must inform you of the suspected offence"
In Maine I was ID'd for doing laundry at a laundromat near a mosque. Yes, I was in the laundromat. I wasn't outside looking 'suspicious'. And the JBTPs did not tell me why they were demanding (not asking) for my ID.
The public needs to learn that law enforcement officials are essentially above the law. They do not have to follow the Constitution, and whatever rights you may have they absolutely have the right to disregard. They will not face any consequences or accountability. That's how our system works.
After serving in the military, I learned a few things about human behavior. Notice that before the officer violated his rights, he had several involuntary movements. This is because he was angry and not in a good mental place. This is a dangerous person. It is only a matter of time before he kills someone for no reason. Have you ever heard someone say, "I don't know what happened?" This is what happens when the brain does not compute the action. They involuntarily shoot someone without the brain inputting the information to do so, whether out of anger or complete muscle memory. This is the type of person who has no business being a police officer. He is out of control of himself.
You make it sound like the PD as a whole missed out on putting these guys on the streets. When maybe it has been their common practice/mentality to train guys like these for the streets. Worse case scenario the guy gets re-assigned somewhere else or to a desk job while everything blows over. All while the PD Union smooths things out with PR and the guy is still getting paid somehow. In any other line of modern work gross negligence is consequently punished by termination. But not the modern gangs wearing blue uniforms funded by tax payers money.
@CSmania1991 Yeah. That was a bit weird, to be honest. I joined the military when I was younger, not to go kill people, but to help people. You know how many kids I would walk around and play with on patrol? You know how many people I would talk to as we made our rounds? You know how many I handed toys, candy, food, clothing, you name it to? Yes, I confronted the enemy, as is my job. But, I made it a priority to ensure I treated everyone with dignity, respect, and compassion. THEY are living in a warzone. Not me. They had no choice. I did. And they didn't deserve to be treated horrendously. Their lives were already bad. But, here you are, demonizing anyone who has even a little compassion for the people around them. This is why people get the view that humanity is bad in general. The US is one of the worst places to live at this point. For sure. Due to people acting badly at every turn. So many lie, so much corruption, so much police state, and so many people out looking to cause someone else harm in any way possible. I truly don't want to be here anymore. This place scares the living crap out of me.
The mute button needs to be removed from all body cameras. They are hiding critical information. The public that pays for those cameras should know what they are talking about.
Ok… This one will keep me awake. I can not even comprehend the lack of care in an officer. He is causing harm and danger of falling by aggressively maneuvering a non violent person, who needs protection of his one good leg. Then says he doesn’t care that this man doesn’t have toes??? Toes are stabilizers for standing and walking. Where do these officers come from and who trains or screens them?
@@sackeshi If the deputy actually honored his oath and protected the 4th amendment rights instead of violate them and have an unhinged, ego-driven, abusive power trip, we wouldn't be having this conversation, would we?
8 months ago Tampa police beat me up and arrested me for being deaf and seized my hearing aids case was dismissed but they to this day are still holding my hearing aids as evidence. No atturney will help either
File a lawsuit under the ADA; Americans with Disabilities Act! You should be able to find a non profit like the ACLU or such to write a letter. Also check if there is an organization for people with hearing loss that can help. Also go to the news!
Actually, he did. But he was not smart enough to realize it. They had cut the lock to get on the property. That while legal in these circumstances would have been enough to justify an investigation. And, IDs.
@@bobmazzi7435So if your landlord or bank holding a mortgage on your house changed the locks without finalizing an eviction...you'd be OK with that. 🤔 No. You wouldn't. So don't bother trying to justify it.
This is why I am not am cop. I am unstable from things I saw in combat. If I were to deal with uneasy situations daily, I would likely snap. I can handle the occasional flared situation, but I would end up breaking the constitution at some point, and I could not live with myself. So, I refused to be law enforcement. Plus, I couldn't stand by while a coworker did this. I would end up going after my colleagues. This is atrocious behavior.
Notice around 11:04 that the cop suddenly becomes more aggressive when the ladycop shows up. How was he being uncooperative? The guy explained his side of everything. How would his ID solve anything, again?
Probably taking steroids and getting aggressive in the presence of women. His blood pressure was so high it looked like his forearms were about to burst.
Because his white shirt showed up and since it's a female and the officer on scene is of Latin descent, he wanted to show off for the lady in white 🤦🏻♂️
Everyone that lives where these Leo’s are should be sending this video to every local news agency, any and all local government and especially the police departments.
This officer from the start has a failure to comprehend the English language. The older gentleman was quite thorough in his explanation of the situation. I hope this gentleman sues these twits!!!!
That's raciss.. The officer was clearly raised to speak Ebonics. It's a shame he gets calls and can't just text all the time, cuz he hates bein on his phone... Bet he doesn't have a printer at home, too. Sorry, some of us had Milk growing up; it's good for ya, apparently and obviously as demonstrated.
Mr. Bailey literally knows the law better than the cops on scene and that's clear after only 4 minutes. When are we gonna end this nonsense and get rid of qualified immunity at the very least? If the law is to be enforced it needs to be understood, how is that not the most basic of requirements.
"I know he has ID on him, I can smell it. If he don't gimme a little, then we take him and hold em in our basement until they do what we want..." -Modern Policing in America
What did the officer 👮🏼♂️ (male), in 👀 searching Mr. Bailey pockets, reaching in Mr. Bailey in pulled out piece of paper 📄, looked at it, then threw it down on ground! Lawsuits against Deputies check with disabilities! Mr. Bailey definitely deserves an A+ and more importantly updates please 🙏 Thank You ☺️
Good point! Everything inside the man’s pockets are the man’s property even if just a receipt for a bar of chocolate, for example. No one has the right to take or destroy it, other than the man
As a visually impaired person, I remember seeing a previous video where the police took a man's white cane. If someone took that from me, I would be limited in my ability to navigate, and it would impair my mobility. Taking someone's leg, cane, or other mobility tools is absolutely unacceptable and discrimination, at the very least, if not a form of kidnapping, since, at that point, the person is being held against their will. These unlawful arrests are dumb. YOU ARE NOT JUDGE DREDD; YOU CANNOT DEMAND RANDOM CITIZENS IMMEDIATELY COMPLY AND GIVE YOU ALL THEIR STUFF AND THEIR ID. This guy was even willing to comply, but instead, this happens. I hope he files a civil rights lawsuit against them.
@ you don’t need to be able to see a keyboard to type. You can be taught to memorize the keyboard, layout and type with your fingers using the home row method. You also don’t need to be able to see the computer screen to use a computer. There are programs that can read the screen contents to you. There are also modified displays that output braille, though those are not really used as much anymore, but they do exist.
@@neurohack9038 BTW, look at your keyboard. See the dot at the bottom of the F and J keys? That's there so the visually impaired can get to the home row.
What a bunch of incompetent cops. Bullying an elderly man with a disability and an actual knowledge of the law. They should be sued personally along with the department
Dude has a prosthetic leg and their demanding I mean, insisting that he get up off the ground. These cops are absolutely out of their mind and out of touch of reality.
Hear's the Deal, those two Law Enforcement Officers should be Terminated from their Department and their Certificate of Law Enforcement, Sued and must pay their own judgement against them
Same thing that’s wrong with tons of cops. They got annoyed talking to people and tired of being on the call, so they escalated it to justify going hands on/make an arrest.
I fear how these two low iq psychopaths treat their families behind closed doors, with the collusion and acceptance of other abusers with badges, and the protection of a dirty union
Every cop who I've heard say, "That's not how this works," ended up being wrong. That's a sure sign that thry don't know the law and are trying to justify the stubbornness of their ignorance.
I think these police officers should be held accountable. This guy was having a very hard time as it was just standing there talking to them much less arresting him, and treating him the way they did. He offered to give a I D if he was under suspicion of a crime or under the threat of arrest. I hope he sees them in the department and the city. This was totally uncalled for.
Id love to see how this plays out in court because the officer never once demanded his ID but instead he repeatedly asked for his ID and then when he said ill give it to you u der threat of arrest the officer says it doesn't work that way. It sounds like the officer believes asking for ID and demanding ID are the same thing.
Hope you have a great Monday and a fantastic week! Pick up your copy of The Civilian Rights Handguide here: a.co/d/aDvE0xL
Keep up the good work brother! The education is much appreciated! 🙏
It’s actually a great read! First book I’ve read in two years lol. And it’s gonna make a good Christmas present too.
I can save you guys money. No need to buy the book. How do you handle police encounters? Simple. Never talk to police. Avoid encounters whenever possible. Video record, comply, and sue them afterwards if they violate your rights, and they likely will.
Should have told him to flock off on 3.10.
Why is your country so....
Primitive?
What possible reason was there for them to get his I.D? There was none. The cops reason was they got a call. That's not enough
I would like to thank Audit the Audit for covering my story. The feedback is greatly appreciated.
Any update with the charge Allan? Was it dropped?
@@ciaranmasterson4276was wondering the same thing.
Hope you win the lawsuit. This was out of control.
U know the law, they didn't.
I am so glad they covered your story. Hopefully you can somehow get some justice for what was done to you.
They should not have the option to mute the body Cam there needs to be a full record of everything going on at that time that also stops them from doing scandalous shit too
Agreed. I'd prefer beep redactions for info like addresses or other personal info when bodycam is released over any ability to mute them.
I agree
I wish we could this this passed into federal law as 99.9% of Americans agree. I think the only people who are opposed are those employed in law enforcement.
@deannanace8935 - as a leo, i could care less if you pass or not.I don't know how officers are able to mute. I've had three different body cams and I can't do that. All I have is one button to turn on and off the camera itself and a button to tag the videos.
Our policy is it has to be on every time we encounter the public. We get wrote up if we don't. If we didn't capture something on video thata vital because we didnt hit record, we would be fired. If we were found to have done it on purpose, we would be charged for suppression of evidence and fired.
The problem you're going to have is the way our constitution is set up.The federal government is not supposed to make blanketed laws like that.Each state's on their own.
The real problem is these officers in this video, along with all the others in these channels are idiots, but they don't represent all of us, contrary to popular belief.
💯 agreed
"I'm gonna arrest you if you don't ID"
"OK under threat of arrest I will ID"
"You can't do that!"
Like what?
This man seems very cooperative
The cop is unreasonable
They’re cops, of course they’re unreasonable
To the cops, apparently, any exercise of rights is being non-cooperative.
Why do you handle the old man like a gangster? 😢😢😢😢😢😢
He was too cooperative. I wouldn't try to give any details about my sibling's business situation. Any contradiction could be used against my sibling, as well as other details that I don't know would be a legal issue.
But, as the female officer claimed he was " not doing anything we ask..."
Except, you know, answering virtually every quistion for almost ten minutes.
Only an authoritarian @sshole thinks that answering 20 questions , but not #21 is " not doing anything we ask ".
It should be a minimum of 10 years for first offence for muting body cams. This video is why citizens HATE COPS.
Ten years and immediately fired for contemning evidence.
When the body cameras get muted is when the conspiracy begins. Body cameras should not have a mute button. If there is a concern about releasing confidential information, they can legally have that information censored by law.
The group sessions by the police are sometimes called "the Piggy Huddle".
I wonder if the mute button shouldn't just be removed!
@@charlesriekerk4676Contaminating? What is Conteming?
“Why do you guys hate us? Comply little a good little citizen to whatever we want to do and let us take taxpayer money to pay off our screwups and don’t forget to never ever ever even pretend to hurt our egos and we’ll get along great”
They went to cuff him as soon as he said he wanted to record! That’s a first amendment violation too! This whole, “We got a call, so…..” or “We’re here lawfully, so…..” stuff HAS to stop!
On paper what LEOs often do is not just a violation of policy, they are actual crimes, but then again is a crime really a crime if DAs refuse to prosecute? People keep talking about ending qualified immunity, how about forcing DAs to press charges when LEOs break the law.
I love when cops say we're not violating your rights as they are violating his rights
I don't. regards and respect.
what do cops think ours rights are ?
Sarcasm bud @DAITHIEIRE
Not to mention, "That's not how that works." That's *exactly* how it works! You ask for it voluntarily, I'll decline. You demand under threat of arrest, I'll surrender it and file a complaint later.
These two cops are under investigation for planting drugs, stealing his money and assault, the women cop is currently being investigated for drug felony and the other cop has previous for drug planting and violence against children the case is pending
Being asked if you're a soverign citizen because you know the law better than the cops paid to enforce it, is crazy work.
cops are the biggest soverign citizens there is
The cops are the sovereign citizens. They don’t follow the laws of the land.
Especially when the cops are the real sovereign citizens with their qualified immunity.
Direct result of their training & indoctrination.
That female officer was alarmingly stupid and condescending. She needs to see a jail cell
"You are being uncooperative."
_"I appreciate that you realize that."_ 😂😂😂😂
Both cops are unhinged.
And corrupt as well
nope, just low IQ, and hence low empathy.
The disabled guy was in the wrong according to the bootlicker ATA.
No. Both cops are criminals.
Here we go.....it's just a few isn't it.... They are control freaks on American citizens, like the officer said, " no one cares."
The way the male officer ramps it up after the female officer shows up, makes me think there’s a little fraternization going on between them.
Nah that cop was a polesmoker for sure.
Thinking the same
I noticed that too. Like he had something to prove.
Everywhere. Forces make Diddy parties look tame.
Ditto on that.
"nobody is threatening you with an arrest...... now put your hands behind your back."
Cop logic at its best!
First they’re scared of acorns, pots of water and rebuking Jesus, now they’re scared of men with prosthetic legs.
Good analogy
Let's not forget pocket lint. 🤣
And they're terrified of navigational tools like a walking stick for the blind
To he fair to the cop, maybe he had been watching the film, The Fugitive, If they had just arrested the man with the Prosthetic limb in that movie, it would have been a much shorter film
They certainly didn't care about his toes.
Removing his leg and putting it in the trunk is a blatant violation of the ADA. Also these officers must realize that they cant just grab someone with a prosthesis and spin them around. There is a greatly reduced aspect of rotational stability in that type of prosthetic with a suspension sleeve and trying to forcefully turn someone will just rip the leg right out of the socket which is exactly what we see happens. Imagineif a police officer came up to a motorcyclist and grabbed his helmet and ripped it around sideways and yanked it off! Can you imagine the outcry this would generate? This is exactly what happens to someone wearing a prosthesis! You can just rip around without either risk damaging the tissues of the residual limb and or the knee joint itself which is partially contained in the socket. Being secure in your person includes your prosthesis. This case should be taken up and brought to court by an advocacy group to highlight the injustice shown here to disabled people!
Can confirm. I played tackle football with a friend that had a prosthetic. It was coed, not high impact, but we still tackled. He went down awkwardly on a play and had to have surgery to repair the stump.
I've seen cops remove arrestees glasses all the time. And btw, there's a huge difference between cops confiscating an arrestee's helmet and confiscating his or her prosthetic limbs. Prosthetics are by definition medically necessary, helmets aren't.
@@jackesiotoif you twist a helmet and pull on it, the rider for sure will need medical afterwords. I think that was the point
Qualified immunity. Unless there is a court case already ruled on that SPECIFICALLY has a prosthetic leg being placed in the trunk of a car then theres nothing that can be done. If there was a similar case but it was a prosthetic arm and not leg it won't count because its not the exact ruling. Thats how qualified immunity works. The specifics need to be specific to whats been ruled on.
@@betterthanmost9549Unfortunately for these tyrants and boot lickers sticking up for them. The federal rules that there doesn’t have to be an existing case anymore. The only requirement is now. That a reasonable person would know what they were doing is wrong
As a former officer, I am now ashamed I ever was associated after watching tyrannical, poorly trained police impersonators like these. I truly hope this individual files a law suit. 😡Is there a go fund me?
There’s a city in ca called merced. A cop there was arrested for robbing a citizen. A females deputy sheriff in same county was found in bed with a convicted gang member by the probation dept. conducting a surprise visit early one morning.
A deputy chief of police in a city called fresno was arrested by fbi for facilitation and profiting from distribution of drxxugs in his own city. Ofcourse we all know Henry Chapman 15 yr sworn officer of CMPD charlotte arrested for stealing $900 from an arrestee in his custody. And guess what- he was caught by the arrestee in handcuffs while his fellow cops stood there and did not do a thing to assist the arrestee. You probably have heard of Matthew Krueger of DFWPD. He’s known as Freddy Kreuger in the streets of Fort Worth. He is known for hurting people. His last victim was a 95lb 65 year old woman that he planted into concrete pavement head first breaking numerous facial bones and ribs and putting her in hospital in a coma. Police unions chiefs hold defacto power over police chiefs in many places. List goes on and on. It’s no wonder that people in general and specially people on lower socioeconomic side have no trust in police any more. They used run around telling us they were heroes but when cameras came along the truth came out.
"as you can see I have no toes" "nobody cares" and
"Under threat of arrest I will ID, if you're not gonna arrest I will refuse" "that's not how that works"......I am speechless.....
“None of these cars are registered to you?” - A very sly way to try to get his identity against his will. (Running the plate)
He would be on the back foot if they were his
I thought that exact same thing.
I have no sympathy for people who talk non-stop to Cops and answer question after question, especially those who have some knowledge of their rights.
I get you're special Ed, so I'll keep it basic. They were going to arrest him if he didn't talk or if he didn't ID himself. Hopefully your parents can limit your ability to go online. @@montezuma6962
I don't think he would have run the plates. Too much work and then he doesn't even get to escalate and push a 60 year old around.
TBH I would rather cops ran plates and find other available information as part of their investigation rather than always escalating.
The purpose of the body camera is to provide an unbiased and independent witness to a situation. Why do police officers have the ability to hide or preemptively destroy evidence?
Because the reality is, those cameras are nothing more than a scarlet letter. They are there to present the illusion of compliance, and transparency, when in actuality they are not feared by LE. The Police Unions fought tooth & nail to prevent their people from having to wear those BWC's, anyone with half a brain in their head knows exactly why. There is also another false premise that people have not yet come to grips with, that is the "good faith" doctrine that goes along with any degree of agency, (meaning power granted to an individual or organization by the people of a community, or society in general). Any and all miscalculations can be viewed as such, because of that "good faith" fallacy. All and all those cameras were a concession that LE and their unions had to accept, because of the loss of trust in that "good faith" ideal.
The obsession with ID has to be studied.
They need to fish for warrants.
They want to put you in the system as many as possible
I feel like they're getting paid per ID. Otherwise why on earth would they be that hell-bent on getting any and all people's papers?
I agree it should be studied. It’s possible that officers are confusing department policy for law, but that makes you question why aren’t department policies made to be compatible with law?
Absolutely they used failure to ID just to abuse your rights.
As an amputee, I am disgusted by both cops' actions. A little empathy goes a long way.
Imagine being deaf, walking down the street. And a cop yells at you from behind...
A little empathy gets you screened out
@@geoffleach8948 like the guy in AZ?
Psychopaths have no empathy. They're nothing more than purely instinctual predator, like a tiger, sadistic and dangerous to everything around it.
Sociopaths and psychopaths don't have empathy. Their brains don't work like that.
Good on you Mr Bailey. I'm sorry you were mistreated this way.
Sounds like a shady owner called the cops just to be an a-hole and the cops totally delivered. Manhandling a disabled man for no reason, easy payday.
I smell a enormous lawsuite.
That is a civil issue that is people versus people. If it was we wouldn’t have to watch a video of a old man being abused if it wasn’t for the police’s actions this would’ve never happened you’re trying to justify as if the owner caused this in somewhere someway, he could be just as good as a man as the old man in the video police are meant to mediate not make things worse
If you had ever sued cops, it's very hard
@@riograul2043not when they make it easy like this.
The scales of justice are never balanced with money, Ever.
The 4th amendment doesn’t allow them to require ID for their reports. It’s like crack to them, that’s the best analogy. Why was it so important? The brother who was apparently in charge was on the property!
They act like an ID will tell them if someone committed a crime or not. It's ridiculous
It's primitive psychology
Identifying yourself is done by lesser or lowers. They need to tell you who they are because they aren't important
Nobility never needed to introduce themselves because they were already known
In a Cop's mind, they are a Duke, a Baron, a Warlord.
To have some random person not identify themselves challenges their authority
@@meonkrishnanan5920 Bingo.
@meonkrishnanan5920 you're not wrong. It's definitely an attempt to assert dominance. Police have traditionally been trained to maintain active control of every situation, even if the circumstances don't warrant it. Add some aggressive Social Identity Theory and you've got modern law enforcement culture. It's all about asserting control and dominance.
Depending on State Law you have to. Florida isn’t a stop and id state, buuuuut the cops in Florida are corrupt and loopholed it through obstruction.
Muting body camera's should be charged by the D.A. as tampering with evidence.
These cops have mastered the art of speaking in circles ...
Cop: Can I have your ID?
Man: Under threat of arrest, I'll provide it.
Cop: We're not threatening to arrest you.
Man: OK. I'm not going to provide it.
Cop: Turn around and put your hands behind your back.
Man: OK -- if you're gonna arrest me, I'll give you my ID.
Cop: That's not how it works.
Huh? Can someone please explain in what world this makes any shred of sense?
Cop world.
moronworld
When you're used to attacking people and charging THEM with assault, you become pretty narcissistic and blame all of your mistakes and failures on the other person. Fairness and what is just doesn't come into play, it's what you want at that point.
The police officer asks multiple times if he had an ID four or five times the citizen says yes.
Of this was re erased the police would use that to say he was intoxicated because he keeps asking for ID multiple times.
the cops barely speaks English what you expect
This cop cares more about the ID than anything else. Need ID more than they need donuts.
He'd IDdicted
PEPE COIN ON ETH TP THE MOON BABY!!
That's literally how they all are.
Control when unnecessary
The ID tells their bosses that they are doing something for the welfare payments recieved.
I hope this guy sues and gets a large pay day from the police department. I love it when my tax money gets distributed thru law enforcement lawsuits.
And this is why police should be REQUIRED to ARTICULATE their RAS to the suspect before being able to COMPEL ID. How am I supposed to know if I legally have to surrender my ID without this information being relayed?
In THEIR eyes, they REALLY don't think that they HAVE to tell you ANYTHING.
In this case it's even worse because he clarified that they were just asking and not demanding and he was told that they were asking. After they said they would arrest him he complained and then offered to give them his ID. These cops have a dangerous level of ego.
No crime no iD, this man was awesome,knew his rights!
If you remain silent you will cover all the bases, let them arrest you then sue them.
That boggles my mind. In England, Police must identify themselves and inform one of the reasonable articulated suspicion of a crime they have before they exercise the powers granted by their Public Office. In America it seems ‘put your hands behind your back’ means ‘you are under arrest’. Outrageous 👍🏻
Mr. Bailey was apparently guilty of obstructing his arrest by agreeing to provide his ID. Some of the most bizarre rationale I've ever seen by a "cop".
"If you comply with our (unlawful) demands, you will be arrested for preventing us from arresting you."
Bizarro world
@@jeepliving1 this is why we have a second amendment
Unbelievable. The inappropriate demand of ID is like crack cocaine to these idiot cops…
Man: You see, I have no toes.
Cop: Nobody cares!
Such warmth and a sense of protection and service from yet another wonderful cop! 🤮
Sickening
That cop was so insensitive.
I thought this was a joke until I kept watching lol
Friendly reminder that the contact info for police officers is public and easy to find.
I know!!! 😡 😡 😡 What a piece of work. Grrrr
As a disabled guy myself I can only imagine how humiliating and degrading it would be to have something you need to get around seized. I know this guy lives far from Florida but I hope he pushes back against these cops
You could not see a better example of totally inept cops.
The cop should be fired immediately. If you don't know your job, you lose it just like I would. If at my job is not that hard to figure this out. Why do cops keep making this stupid ass mistake? Bad training on their part
The chief should be fired for hiring sub-par law breaking DEI psychopaths.
No it's not bad training. It's lack of accountability. Between qualified immunity and tax payers footing the bill, the worst consequence they suffer is resigning and then moving to another department or paid vacations.
I think you misunderstand the real purpose of the police force.
@@Everhard86 All lawsuits should come out of the police department pay checks if they have to work for free then so be it, that's the law
Institutional failure across the board at all levels!
They are holding him down like he is a flight risk, that just shows the level of power trip. Don't even have the time to realize the gravity of the situation
It's in their training.
In before a bootlicker claims that he could've had a howitzer in his pocket.
As if he will hop up on one leg
Just bullying and control to humiliate.
Scumbags..what else can you say? Get them fired, guys. Is unacceptable.
At 10 minutes in, I have come to the conclusion that this cop isn't even listening. I'm not sure what he's doing with his limited mental capacity, but he sure af ain't listening to the brother explain the situation.
The fella didn't have the poor mental bandwidth to actually have empathy to listen to our guys story, probably one of them out of the district cops that doesn't care about the neighborhood or social impact of his job.
Exactly. The cop only cares about running id to check for warrants. Nothing more.
Pig: I couldn't concentrate man... I just knew he had a bit of ID on him, I could _smell it!_ I really needed some; you don't understand the craving!
And then Squeaky shows up at 11:00 with the same ol' chant, "Do you have your ID on you, boss?" What's this "boss?" "I already told Fruit Loop here that I'm not giving him my ID, and I'm not giving it to you, Sparky, or whatever your name."
@@daveblackman816 They think their job is warrant fishing.
For exercicing his rights,freaking tyrants
It's common knowledge that if you attempt to exercise your rights, then law enforcement officials have the right to violate those rights. That's how the justice system works.
This cop is arrogant and a clear dangerous threat to society
Leos want your ID to research it in the *NCIC* and *share* it with local, state, feds, EffBeeEye, and tribal agencies. If you don't have to, don't give it up. Research the laws in your state. Know your rights. 🖤
He “asked” for ID, and then it became a threat. Even going as low as to asking his age (which he gave) and to check to see what car belonged to him.
Yea asking is fine. It's the refusal to accept no that's a problem. Just like when you approach a woman.
Exactly. The cop was like crackhead dave chapelle scratching his neck trying everything to get his fix
"this is not how this works" cop talk 101. I am wrong, but you need to listen to us.
This kind of behavior is pretty much normalized at this point. We've pretty much accepted that law enforcement officials will violate the Constitution, and simply pay out settlements.
“You are going to call in for any warrants.” - That’s not what we do. (That is exactly what you are going to do). These officers escalated this whole thing because they immediately assumed he was a sovcit. The elderly man explained in precise detail what the situation was, and the officer didn’t listen to any of it. He wasn’t even the lessee. No empathy, unprofessional, and a disgrase. I hope that the elderly man sues these officers and this department. This is heartbreaking and they need to be held accountable for what they did.
The officers thinking he's SovCit while the dude repeatedly referenced and quoted his lawyer is top tier brain damage. A SovCit would NEVER have a lawyer and the cop didn't put that together, what an absolute waste of resources
I’m surprised the officers didn’t claim they were being threatened by the fake leg.
Sir, these police officers should be held accountable for that. If they do that and other police officers see this, they won't try that nonsense again.
12:00 THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU TRY TO HELP COPS BY TALKING TO THEM.
WAKE TF UP. STOP TALKIBG TO THE PIGS!
Mamy ats unaware and don't learn that until it happens to them. Or they have small town cops where they are really good because everyone knows them and treating people like that would not go over well.
@xenosayain1506 small towns have plenty tyrant cops.
@@craftsandstuff3349 varies town to town. Ours were very good people. Only complaint we had was they were e tremley strict about speeding in residential to the point they'll ticket eachother for it. Granted when I say small I'm referring to 5k or less people. Typically the larger the city, the more room for corruption.
Shameful police work. Embarrassing
If there’s one thing I’ve gathered from countless bodycams it’s that your rights only matter in a court of law & not at any time or place outside in public. Unless you find a cop who’s patient & knowledgeable otherwise they will shake you down & arrest you if needed to get what they want. It boils your blood to see it happen so many times bc it’s systemic
Sometimes not even then.
Preach my brother ❤
I feel the same way about "Officer Safety"
Unfortunately, the courts have even said people must take steps to invoke their rights in the field to be able to assert them in court. You can't just remain silent or say, "I don't answer questions," you have to clearly invoke the 5th amendment. And if you utter one word after speaking, you have to invoke again because by speaking, you forfeited the right.
There are no consequences to police for violating your rights. They simply don't care. The money won in a lawsuit does not come from their paycheck.
The only criminals on scene were wearing uniforms, being condescending, escalating and attacking innocent people.. why do they do it!.. because they get away with their crimes
And they honestly enjoy it. That's why they signed up.
@@craftsandstuff3349 sociopaths, narcissist and those who were bullied in school usually go to police force.
All the actions and behaviors of these officers are perfectly ok. If it wasn't, they would be facing some sort of consequences or accountability.
Don’t ever talk to police even if you think it’s just banter… it’s not you can’t have a friendly conversation, they are always looking for something to arrest you for.
I see a MAJOR lawsuit coming here.
I’m a salesman in the uk and I think I have a better understanding of stop and ID laws than most US cops 😂
theres enough videos on it to know that you only have to give ID for crimes lol
@@d3adlyz3bra not in the UK haha
@@jacky5768 the person is from the UK talking about US laws... are you slow? dropped on your head?
@@jacky5768 UK is exactly the same tho, must be why they understand our laws so well. "In the UK, a police officer can only demand your ID if they have a reasonable suspicion that you are involved in a crime or are committing an offence, particularly related to anti-social behaviour, and must inform you of the suspected offence"
@@d3adlyz3bra you didn’t watch the video till the end 😝
In Maine I was ID'd for doing laundry at a laundromat near a mosque. Yes, I was in the laundromat. I wasn't outside looking 'suspicious'. And the JBTPs did not tell me why they were demanding (not asking) for my ID.
Turning off the body-worn camera should carry a perverting the course of justice charge because there's no other reason for doing it.
"Get up it's not that hard", says the tyrant with 2 legs. Florida does it again.
The ponytail cop is the most annoying person on the scene
What an absolute garbage human being. Even putting aside that he's a cop, he assaulted an elderly man who was being polite
Would hardly call 60 elderly, but o/w you're right!
@@stonegasman3866 LOL, considering he can collect social security in 2 years or so... it's not middle aged.
The public needs to learn that law enforcement officials are essentially above the law. They do not have to follow the Constitution, and whatever rights you may have they absolutely have the right to disregard. They will not face any consequences or accountability. That's how our system works.
@@stonegasman3866state of Florida, like most states defines a person 60 - 65 years of age as elderly
@@stonegasman386660 is elderly , r u drunk?
Note how the charge is never, ever, "failure to ID". It's always something else entirely that has nothing to do with ID laws.
Bc failure to ID isn't a law
That's why they always settle too.
Failure to ID is a secondary charge requiring a primary charge first
The fact that they don’t understand the difference between sovereign citizen and basic constitutional rights is astounding
After serving in the military, I learned a few things about human behavior. Notice that before the officer violated his rights, he had several involuntary movements. This is because he was angry and not in a good mental place. This is a dangerous person. It is only a matter of time before he kills someone for no reason. Have you ever heard someone say, "I don't know what happened?" This is what happens when the brain does not compute the action. They involuntarily shoot someone without the brain inputting the information to do so, whether out of anger or complete muscle memory. This is the type of person who has no business being a police officer. He is out of control of himself.
And did you understood you serve smollhat interest in the army ?
@CSmania1991 youre weird af being antisemitic/cringe on these types of videos.
You make it sound like the PD as a whole missed out on putting these guys on the streets. When maybe it has been their common practice/mentality to train guys like these for the streets. Worse case scenario the guy gets re-assigned somewhere else or to a desk job while everything blows over. All while the PD Union smooths things out with PR and the guy is still getting paid somehow. In any other line of modern work gross negligence is consequently punished by termination. But not the modern gangs wearing blue uniforms funded by tax payers money.
@CSmania1991 Yeah. That was a bit weird, to be honest. I joined the military when I was younger, not to go kill people, but to help people. You know how many kids I would walk around and play with on patrol? You know how many people I would talk to as we made our rounds? You know how many I handed toys, candy, food, clothing, you name it to? Yes, I confronted the enemy, as is my job. But, I made it a priority to ensure I treated everyone with dignity, respect, and compassion. THEY are living in a warzone. Not me. They had no choice. I did. And they didn't deserve to be treated horrendously. Their lives were already bad. But, here you are, demonizing anyone who has even a little compassion for the people around them. This is why people get the view that humanity is bad in general. The US is one of the worst places to live at this point. For sure. Due to people acting badly at every turn. So many lie, so much corruption, so much police state, and so many people out looking to cause someone else harm in any way possible. I truly don't want to be here anymore. This place scares the living crap out of me.
At around what minute did you notice he had several involuntary movements?
He should give them his name -- at the top of a lawsuit.
The mute button needs to be removed from all body cameras. They are hiding critical information. The public that pays for those cameras should know what they are talking about.
These cops need to go prison
As should the guy they arrested.
I'm guessing their families would be relieved
Woodchipper
More " brave " cops as seen in Uvalde.
Uvalde!
And Lakeland, and Parkland, and and and
Ok… This one will keep me awake. I can not even comprehend the lack of care in an officer. He is causing harm and danger of falling by aggressively maneuvering a non violent person, who needs protection of his one good leg. Then says he doesn’t care that this man doesn’t have toes??? Toes are stabilizers for standing and walking. Where do these officers come from and who trains or screens them?
So it's let us violate your rights or we will arrest you for refusing.
Comply Or Die.... is the System Of Government we live under.
There is a special place in hell for people that abuse children and seniors.
Amen EDIT: Anyone vulnerable.
Senior citizen & handicapped as well.
And Veterans. An Even Real Special Place in the Mountains
He wasn't abused, he refused to cooperate with the deputy. Play stupid games win stupid prizes
@@sackeshi If the deputy actually honored his oath and protected the 4th amendment rights instead of violate them and have an unhinged, ego-driven, abusive power trip, we wouldn't be having this conversation, would we?
This is completely ridiculous, unprofessional and unacceptable.
8 months ago Tampa police beat me up and arrested me for being deaf and seized my hearing aids case was dismissed but they to this day are still holding my hearing aids as evidence. No atturney will help either
Can you do a go fund me or something, I believe if you have some proof and post it, you would get more than enough money from just the people here
File a lawsuit under the ADA; Americans with Disabilities Act! You should be able to find a non profit like the ACLU or such to write a letter. Also check if there is an organization for people with hearing loss that can help. Also go to the news!
I’m no bootlicker but beat up for being deaf? Something’s missing here, what happened?
@TgWags69 the aclu doesn't focus on actual civil liberties anymore
I'm pretty sure seizing medically necessary items is a violation of so many rights laws.
Crime is a foot.
😂
*angrily gives comment a like*
Good one!
Wow. How corrupt and blatant about it can they be?
Florida.... Look at the reps, governor, and senators even the former governor who is a senator. People need to wake up
The cops never had RAS to demand identification at any point of this interaction.
Actually, he did. But he was not smart enough to realize it. They had cut the lock to get on the property. That while legal in these circumstances would have been enough to justify an investigation. And, IDs.
@@bobmazzi7435So if your landlord or bank holding a mortgage on your house changed the locks without finalizing an eviction...you'd be OK with that. 🤔
No. You wouldn't. So don't bother trying to justify it.
Always sue in cases like this!
Yeah but if you don't have $$$ you're screwed most of the time and you can lose your job for being arrested as well.
Once again, cops get their fragile ego's bruised and retaliate.....
What “crime” was even being committed here? They went after and arrested this man. How do they look themselves in the mirror doing this to someone?
they're psychos enabled by the even bigger psychos that rule over us, they don't need a reason.
This is why I am not am cop. I am unstable from things I saw in combat. If I were to deal with uneasy situations daily, I would likely snap. I can handle the occasional flared situation, but I would end up breaking the constitution at some point, and I could not live with myself. So, I refused to be law enforcement. Plus, I couldn't stand by while a coworker did this. I would end up going after my colleagues. This is atrocious behavior.
They have no problem to look at themselves, not at all, 'cause they are perfect samples of psychopaths.
Theyre such robotic power tripping morons they don't question anything thar might get in the way of getting their sadistic jollies
@amerikanviking you'd be a bad cop preventing other cops from being bad!
Notice around 11:04 that the cop suddenly becomes more aggressive when the ladycop shows up. How was he being uncooperative? The guy explained his side of everything. How would his ID solve anything, again?
Probably taking steroids and getting aggressive in the presence of women. His blood pressure was so high it looked like his forearms were about to burst.
Because his white shirt showed up and since it's a female and the officer on scene is of Latin descent, he wanted to show off for the lady in white 🤦🏻♂️
Everyone that lives where these Leo’s are should be sending this video to every local news agency, any and all local government and especially the police departments.
At this point I don’t think they’ll ever learn.
Error 304: Requisite hardware not found.
They simply don't have to.
Call the mayor or governor who hires these clowns and STOP WHINING
They will once the money for the lawsuits start coming out of their own pockets. So you're right. They'll probably never learn.
They don’t care because they rarely suffer any consequences.
This officer from the start has a failure to comprehend the English language. The older gentleman was quite thorough in his explanation of the situation. I hope this gentleman sues these twits!!!!
Not really. He just wants the ID. Old guy should have said, "my right is I don't have to talk to you. Am I free to leave?"
Shouldnt have to invoke an innate right.
That's raciss.. The officer was clearly raised to speak Ebonics. It's a shame he gets calls and can't just text all the time, cuz he hates bein on his phone... Bet he doesn't have a printer at home, too. Sorry, some of us had Milk growing up; it's good for ya, apparently and obviously as demonstrated.
Mr. Bailey literally knows the law better than the cops on scene and that's clear after only 4 minutes. When are we gonna end this nonsense and get rid of qualified immunity at the very least? If the law is to be enforced it needs to be understood, how is that not the most basic of requirements.
Dude ID is like crack for these cops. They act like they get whiped back at the station if they forget ID
"I know he has ID on him, I can smell it. If he don't gimme a little, then we take him and hold em in our basement until they do what we want..."
-Modern Policing in America
These cops should be facing criminal charges.
What did the officer 👮🏼♂️ (male), in 👀 searching Mr. Bailey pockets, reaching in Mr. Bailey in pulled out piece of paper 📄, looked at it, then threw it down on ground! Lawsuits against Deputies check with disabilities! Mr. Bailey definitely deserves an A+ and more importantly updates please 🙏 Thank You ☺️
Good point! Everything inside the man’s pockets are the man’s property even if just a receipt for a bar of chocolate, for example. No one has the right to take or destroy it, other than the man
As a visually impaired person, I remember seeing a previous video where the police took a man's white cane. If someone took that from me, I would be limited in my ability to navigate, and it would impair my mobility. Taking someone's leg, cane, or other mobility tools is absolutely unacceptable and discrimination, at the very least, if not a form of kidnapping, since, at that point, the person is being held against their will. These unlawful arrests are dumb. YOU ARE NOT JUDGE DREDD; YOU CANNOT DEMAND RANDOM CITIZENS IMMEDIATELY COMPLY AND GIVE YOU ALL THEIR STUFF AND THEIR ID. This guy was even willing to comply, but instead, this happens. I hope he files a civil rights lawsuit against them.
How can you see the keyboard to type?
@ you don’t need to be able to see a keyboard to type. You can be taught to memorize the keyboard, layout and type with your fingers using the home row method. You also don’t need to be able to see the computer screen to use a computer. There are programs that can read the screen contents to you. There are also modified displays that output braille, though those are not really used as much anymore, but they do exist.
@@neurohack9038 BTW, look at your keyboard. See the dot at the bottom of the F and J keys? That's there so the visually impaired can get to the home row.
@@bobmazzi7435 It's not just for the visually impaired. it's for anyone who wants to type without looking.
11:57 These cops do this and go to sleep at night like nothing happened. All this over ID?
Yes. They sleep very well knowing what authority they have.
@@icin4d The authority they THINK they have. These pigs don't have any of the authority they think they have.
Cop's asking for ID has become the equivalent of show me your papers.
What a bunch of incompetent cops. Bullying an elderly man with a disability and an actual knowledge of the law. They should be sued personally along with the department
Dude has a prosthetic leg and their demanding I mean, insisting that he get up off the ground. These cops are absolutely out of their mind and out of touch of reality.
Hear's the Deal, those two Law Enforcement Officers should be Terminated from their Department and their Certificate of Law Enforcement, Sued and must pay their own judgement against them
12:45 "Focus on putting your leg back on" "Hurry up" Wtf is long with these cops?!?
Same thing that’s wrong with tons of cops. They got annoyed talking to people and tired of being on the call, so they escalated it to justify going hands on/make an arrest.
These officers are total scumbags
Grapists won't accept "no" for an answer.
I fear how these two low iq psychopaths treat their families behind closed doors, with the collusion and acceptance of other abusers with badges, and the protection of a dirty union
Every cop who I've heard say, "That's not how this works," ended up being wrong. That's a sure sign that thry don't know the law and are trying to justify the stubbornness of their ignorance.
And those officer still have a job? Wow!!!! They attacked an old man. That is assault.
That man has a HUGE lawsuit going to be in his favor.. Better watch for a 6 figure outcome!
Much higher. I would say 7 figures easy
agree 500 million 8 figures
@@Cotelw8345:
800 million is 9 figures.
800,000,000.
Only if he can get a decent attorney and the judge/jury isn't blu line junkies
@@Cotelw8345 :
500 million is 9 figures.
500,000,000
When the female officer said "you are doing too much" I would of responded "it's because you are NOT doing enough"....
That female officer was in another video not too long ago. She acted the same in that one
I think these police officers should be held accountable. This guy was having a very hard time as it was just standing there talking to them much less arresting him, and treating him the way they did. He offered to give a I D if he was under suspicion of a crime or under the threat of arrest. I hope he sees them in the department and the city. This was totally uncalled for.
Despicable Cops- Way to rough up a disabled man for TALKING!
I have no words this is ridiculous
Id love to see how this plays out in court because the officer never once demanded his ID but instead he repeatedly asked for his ID and then when he said ill give it to you u der threat of arrest the officer says it doesn't work that way. It sounds like the officer believes asking for ID and demanding ID are the same thing.
Its like they wake up thinking “how can i be the worst version of myself today”
"We got a call" should not be an end-run around the 4th Amendment.