Masters of the Air Clip - Bombs On Berlin (2024)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Watch the official clip from Masters of the Air! Streaming on AppleTV+ now.
During World War II, airmen risk their lives with the 100th Bomb Group, a brotherhood forged by courage, loss, and triumph.
Watch MASTERS OF THE AIR for free with a trial subscription ➤ AppleTV.yt/Mas...
Apple TV+ is a streaming service with content exclusively produced by Apple, the Apple Originals. Watch Apple TV+ in the Apple TV app on all your Apple devices or streaming platforms and smart TVs.
© Apple TV+ - บันเทิง
Wtf those bomb explosions look like warthunder on mid settings 💀💀
worse
Gtx 1050 ti settings 😂
Omg while i been watching episodes i been thinking on war scenes exactly seems war thunder
real
I agree. Lamest visuals on the series
CGI effects technicians: "How many P-51's do you want in this shot?"
Director: "All of them. Every P-51 ever made."
🤣
Should we also include the ones fighting the Japs?
Im not sure howany were made but in general in later ww2 the usa had a fuckton of planes compared to anything today
lmao yes!!! “let’s turn an actual event into something the audience obviously would rather see”
@@pickitup7008 sad that.
The CGI made it look like they shot this scene in Google Earth
the CGI makes it look, like some unpaid intern did it.
this is laughable bad.
Wtf where does it look like that? Wtf
@@Xingmey Far from bad, buddy.
@@CasualClinkz Your usual vocal CGI hater usually parrots the same bullshit over and over again and more often than not has little idea what they're talking about and haven't seen a bad CGI in their life. Furthermore most probably don't even know what that abbreviation means or what it stands for.
@@shrekrealista5045 No..the CG throughout the show was rather bad...
those special effects when the bombs detonate are more like 2010
Thought the same thing, like wtf wtf?
Just like all Apple products, then.
They were worse than 2010. CGI was at it's hight in early and mid 2000s as far as realism blended into movies. There is an entire TH-cam video talking about the decline in CGI
@@Ccarnage8 Pretty sure the CGI we have now has much more realism than 20 years ago. Just not this piece
@helloitsmehb nope you are wrong, cgi has downgraded alot since the 2010 days. Down to cost, like everything these days, cheap cheap and lots of profit.
The Mustangs would not be flying inside the formations. That would be committing suicide given the anxiety of the B-17 gunners.
sure thing general, whatever you say general sir
To anyone who is wondering about it: this is NOT how aerial combat looked, looks or will ever look.
@@Ghostfacewutango 2 spankings
@@Ghostfacewutango Go back down into your mom's basement kid. You're just a POS keyboard commando.
@@Ghostfacewutango You need the spanking. He's right. It's common sense. And if you need to be told why, well that just indicates your lack of intelligence. Not someone else.
@@Ghostfacewutango3 spankings
you're right.
Visual effect team consist of one guy called Jeff, who did the work for free in his mom's basement using his 10 year old desktop PC which could barely run CS:GO
Good work Jeff! Maybe not do it after an all nighter next time
I've heard that they outsourced all of the cgi work to India. Just as it is with video games, what was once an impassioned project made by a small group of impassioned people has been corporatized and commercialized to the point that it loses all of its substance and becomes completely forgettable mediocrity.
1:50 imagine living this moment..😮
I like how the CG went from pretty damn good to "wait a minute" and then absolutely fell off a cliff. and they really put 3000 fighters dog fighting in like this exact point in the air.
its not that hard, but somehow directors will always find a way to fuck things up.
The cgi of the Mustangs at 0:08 looked like it was copied and pasted from a single cgi plane. So I froze one frame and yes it looked like it was.
lol, u r right
those mustangs look more like the Ki-61 Hien lol.
The show is so CGI heavy that cutting corners wherever you can is very much mandatory.
That scene at 2:09 is like something from Battlestar Galactica. Why do CGI people always go way too far with air combat? The whole point is to make a scene seem real, not to show off CGI. After Band of Brothers this is disappointing. (Edited to tone down the language).
not even Battlestar Galactica more like a swarm of gnats on speed xD
Band of Brothers really didn't have to deal with battles of this scale since they focused in on small battles. These bomber missions are different with hundreds if not thousand plus aircraft.
Over critical ,12 year olds, yourre 13 i take it
@@phillipr61Well, on reflection you have a point. It was a knee-jerk reaction to some of the disappointing moments and was indeed overly critical. I will edit my original reponse and tone it down.
Señor no lo conozco pero estoy seguro que hubieron cientos o quizá miles de aviones volando en los cielos de Europa y Alemania cuando lanzaban bombas sobre objetivos, en el 2:09 estoy seguro que si sucedió, tal vez no tane exactamente como es pero estoy seguro que si hubo choques de aviones; me refiero a dogfither. Entonces el cgi lo hizo bien.
If u pause at 2:39 and look at lowest plane and look at the plane to the left it’s bombs just disappear
I slowed it down and then noticed all sorts of bombs appearing and disappearing in the background. Some streams of bombs in the background come out of nowhere. No bomber dropped them.
You would be seeing shock wave rings in those explosions.
Correct.. which you'd expect to see from a series that is built around bombing
2:09 I’m sorry but is just a little chaotic to be realistic
You’re saying war isn’t chaotic?
@@matthewriley7826he's saying air battles in world war two didn't look that chaotic.
star wars
Tell that to the fallen.
@@kevingetsinger9159 Lols no. What a stupid thing to say from an ignorant kid like you. This isn't call of duty child. Go back to fortnite and you tell that to the fallen. Stupid sheep😂😂😂
That CGI makes it look like that one mission in COD WWII
What did you expect? For then to re-create these events with the thousands of B-17 that no longer exist? I’m happy we finally even got this series after over a decade of anticipation.
@@Obospeedo And no answer. Figures. Idiots keep parroting about how "terrible" CG is in this series (it's fine, it's not perfect but it's certainly bad) with no further though whatsoever. Making a series about WW2 bomb group without CGI was never possible. The best you can do with real planes is what Dunkirk did (and it was great).
@@jackiemortes It’s about using good CGI, this CGI is terrible.
The f**kin Annabelle at @0:21
To further the theme a complete lack of realism in this clip, anyone notice the ridiculous number bombs being dropped by those B-17's? It looks like there are about 50 bombs in each stick being dropped by each individual B-17.
Damn, I was looking forward to this series. Considering "Band of Brothers," and "The Pacific," did really well I was hoping for the same. Yet, this one clip makes me rethink that. Even the closest in Mustangs would still be 1,000 feet above the bomber stream, not flying through the formation. The second he P-51's spotted enemy planes, they'd ditch the drop tanks, the P-51's started out in "Finger Four," formation but later changed to Line Abreast. This just hurts.
Got half way through,then didnt bother with the rest.
Pretty much a glorified soap opera.Not a patch on Band of Brothers or Pacific
You made the right call. It was bad. The actors were downright unlikeable and there was no unifying theme or narrative like BOB or the Pacific. It was just "hey fellas whaddya say we 23-skidoo into these forts", more or less all of them getting shot down, then some time in a POW camp. The Tuskegee airmen storyline was an afterthought and would have been a better basis for a series. Hanks/Spielberg have lost their fastball it seems.
Didn't the RAF stop using the finger four, or was it the US?
@@chrislapp9468 the raf changed from the vic formation to the german schwarm formation,after realising it was far more flexible after the battle of britain...this was renamed the finger four for the RAF.Seems they used it all through the war,but that formation would immediately be broken ,when going into combat.
best fighter of the war is actually hilarious, another Tom Hanks production.
109 G-14 190 D-9/13 ran rings around p51 using altitude
Band of Brother’s success is due to its reasonable scale. In budget, timeline, characters and story it’s all much easier than Pacific or Masters of the Air. You can properly tell the story of easy company in 10, one hour episodes. You can’t tell “With the Old Breed”, “A helmet for my Pillow”, and “I’m staying with my boys” in that same scope. You can’t tell the story of the bloody hundredth in a few episodes. A mini series is a great tool to follow a couple dozen people over a story spanning a year or so. Not hundreds of people over nearly 5 years.
EXACTLY! I think they failed to understand why _Band of Brothers_ was successful. Because they stayed with one relatively small group of soldiers the audience got to know them and how they functioned as a unit. And because of that the combat scenes were all the more intense because the audience was invested in those characters. _The Pacific_ was a lot harder to follow as they jumped from unit to unit and many characters were in and out before viewers even knew anything about them. And _Masters of the Air_ went even further in the wrong direction.
I'm not a fan of BOB but i like this one.
Over 5 years? Two and a half more like.
We’re all the P-51s on the same mission? And why on earth are they flying through the bomber formation?
This happened it's called close protection. It was ineffective but it was used. But mostly this was filmmakers choice to get the point across. And the 51 s had to keep pace with the bombers to not be in Berlin and back when they didn't even get there yet
@@CasualClinkz What a load of utter bollox. Escorts only flew top cover for their own protection from nervous and edgy bomber gunners. RAF Spitfires could only escort them to the coast at one point and they would flash their wings when approaching to indicate that they were friendlies.
@@haitolawrence5986 not only but ok. Every nation experimented with close protection and found out it was ineffective as I said. That's why I said filmmakers choice to fit the frame.
I suggest actually reading comments.
Also the British like you said couldn't even escort
@@haitolawrence5986 this isn't the RAF. The USAAF could escort there and back.
Great costumes and set design in the bomber but holy shit it looks like the intro to revenge of the sith lol
Awesome?
Nah, RoTS looks way better than this haha
The whole series looks like Star wars with a WW2 skin.
I got Apple TV because of this
POV me and the bois going in for our PPL checkride
The cgi is good for a series. They save the good stuff for movies. If they made every episode look movie quality they'd exceed their budget after only 3 episodes.
Apparently sound travels instantly in this world as the moment the bombs explode you hear them.
2:36 that shot brings back memories of battlefield 1942
TH-cam always deletes my comments lol.
It wasn‘t Berlin it was Erkner in the near of Berlin a Small City with like 15.000 People and it was mostly a rural City.
I new a couple of men who survived the air war over Europe in B 17s. One was a ball turret gunner. They said the B 17 could take a lot of punishment and keep flying.
I knew an older gentleman whose dad was in the air war and he had a picture of him standing on the side of his B17 raising his arms and legs spread out like a star where a piece of flak blew it to shit that he had to ride back in. Crazy
WOW….. I had never actually noticed the “bad CGI” in some of the other clips until this one. That is absurd. I have BofB and the Pacific, but I don’t even think I’ll seek this out to watch it. Talk about a suspension of disbelief killer. The P51s at the beginning look like a repeating rolling screed superimposed over the film it’s so bad. I’d expect that from a rotating lamp shade to keep kids entertained at night.
Amazing scene. Imagine the feeling of those in the B-17s who survived 1943 finally getting fighter escorts the whole way to their targets and back. The first half of 1944, the mustangs took out so many German aircraft in the skies and parked at Airfields, thousands of them, that the Luftwaffe was unable to provide any arial defense in France during D-day. All they could provide was defense of Germany going forward.
Hermann Goring: "When I saw Mustangs over Berlin, I knew the jig was up."
I've seen those planes takeoff, they vibrate nonstop and are stupid loud. This crew would be screaming at each other. None of this is as peaceful as they're making it look
The Fw-190 was just as good as the P-51
Every plane has strenghts and weaknesses, that said, the us pilots were better and also better quality fuel
@@phillipr61 In the list of Top 100 ww2 pilots, all of them are German...
@@generalposlijebitke6688Those list don’t matter, both sides had different policies in regard to veteran pilots. The Western Allies retired veteran pilots to use them to train, the germans kept them on the frontline. By 1944 when the Mustang was introduced german pilot quality had significantly degraded and were far below allied pilot quality
@@toxicfireball2690 Sure, they were outnumbered from the start of the war...
@@generalposlijebitke6688hellcat pilots:
2:09 WW2 Macross style.
So apparently, 250 Million Dollars gets you *checks notes* 2008 Video game CGI
I loooove this show and I actually watched this
The P-51 was the best fighter plane of the war according to the Americans.
The Spitfire was 100% superior in a dog fight. Just not over Berlin.
P-39 had more kills (in the Soviet Air Force); the F6F had a higher kill ratio; the P-38 had better maneuverability, firepower, and twin engine redundancy; the P-47 was tougher, the Tempest was fastest Allied fighter of the war, and the Hurricane was the only reason there was a winnable war in the first place.
and none of those planes could fly with the bombers to germany and back, much less while keeping enough fuel to be able to competently fight german air power. fighter clearly isn't 'best' if its not present at the fight at all. your criteria for "best" is horseshit
@@philtackett5149
Any argument for best is horseshit but people will still argue for their own ego.
0:19 oh no. Not those ragdolls 💀
old war thunder trailers have more convincing visuals than that 😭
This lmao
The Mk. 9 spitfire would see off a mustang. Sometimes the RAF had too in miss identified meetings.
Idk, it looks good to me.
2:38 - the last bomb in the middle had gravity turned off somehow?
The shot of the bombs falling is straight out of a late ps2/early 360 game, haha
For anyone even thinking of saying "That's too many bombs dropping...etc": th-cam.com/video/-0Hr7W_B4oc/w-d-xo.html
Thank you for that. It explained a lot.
This should be top comment,
There probably weren't that so many that you could bump into each other. Thats a whole air fleet of P51 in one bombing run.
I don’t understand why this got so much hate, none of you were there, NONE of you and many of these scenes are taken from the very minds of the pilots they interviewed. It was a great show, so many of you nerds just need to get a grip.
This show was positioned as created for lovers of this topic, but it was created by those people and for those people who will not change anything about it.
If we were shown a space battle from Star Wars + with bad CGI, it can't be excused because we weren't there.
And which "event participants" are you talking about? If they were, they may have described it as "chaos", which the director took as his own.
Do you want to learn about WWII aviation? Read books by people who at that time still knew how to walk independently...
@@TunderTunder. Quit paying too much attention to CGI, it’s not great but it gets its point of the story across. Allocation of budgeting is different in every project, of course this isn’t going to be pacific rim level cgi or real planes considering there’s a handful of B-17’s left. It’s comical to even disregard the entire show as everyone is doing over special effects. Practice on that short attention span of yours and sit still and watch the show.
largest raid on Berlin featured 1500 bombers and 1000 fighters but the Mustangs wouldn't have been using close escort tactics, which never worked.
Why the dogfights’ too fast? This isn’t very accurate imo
The book's main point was the strategic air campaign needed fighters against the common "wisdom" of the Bomber Mafia. They barely scratched this topic beyond a line or two in the series.
Взрывы конечно впечатляют!!!
That’s one hell of a dog fight over Berlin damn
The Mustangs can maneuver in combat with the wing tanks still on?
Goering knew the war was lost when he found out the p 51 had enough fuel to escort their bombers for the whole mission
what year is this supposed to be?
Haven't seen the whole thing, but CGI as of 2024 seems to rely on overcast, twilight or glare and dirty windows. Scott's Napoleon had similar low light or visual impairment. Also there seem to be too many aircraft in one place. It looks dramatic, but the fighters would be more spread out. The bomber crews felt that they were being used as bait because the P-51s were freed from close escort of the bombers and turned loose to hunt Luftwaffe fighters.
Not low light it's daytime. But you're right with the escorts. Tho the fighters would have to keep pace with the bombers so for some of the time.they were in fact close by. Also some of this is filmmakers choice to get the point across since most people don't know shit about this
Hazy light to mask the CGI limitations (instead of low light). @@CasualClinkz
@@johnmurphy7953 all of your points are artistic choices like depth and visual differences. cgi is only limited by the amount of work put into it.
To be fair to the "Masters", they had to create an entire air force and keep it in motion during the battle scenes. With "Battle of Britain", some surviving aircraft and remote control models were the options used. Surviving aircraft are now almost non-existent. I'm sure CGI will get even better as it progresses. @@CasualClinkz
I forgot they recorded all their plane scenes in war thunder
I kinda want to boot up some of my windows XP war games…
My Dad did that 30 times in a B-24!
Ya know, I wouldn't normally get overly hung up on CGI but this is pretty horrendous. It's 2024 and the explosions look like that? Come on...
Wow, so many YT certified WW2 experts over here 😂
Well, of course. The greatest generation is all but gone. All that's left are the stories and the ones who read them.
They were there, man... You just don't get it
I was there, 3,000 years ago!
Welp, you can see plenty of gun camera and war camera man footage of exactly what this show was trying to recreate. They did a really, really bad job.
Memphis Belle still the best movie about the B-17 bomber.
Bloody hell, the CGI department could have had a bit more funding
how the hell would you ever be able to tell who the friendlies and who the enemies are there. Lots of friendly fire I assume
There's the red tails escuadron? P51. 😮🎉🎉🎉
Red Tails!
Pretty soon the overuse of CGI will create more and more inaccurate depictions of these planes.
As did the movie "Midway" that starred Woody Harrelson as Admiral Nimitz for God's sake.
Say what you want. I think the show is good.
maybe some scene is unrealistic to others but i think they just want to show us how hundred of plane clashing in the air look like
This series is just a modern version of the 1960's tv series "12 O'Clock High". Here's a link to the theme song: th-cam.com/video/p0qYEUhTx58/w-d-xo.html
Here's a link to Season 1
th-cam.com/video/5_Q7NSR8aZ8/w-d-xo.html
Сколько бы сшататы не рисовали и не снимали фильмов, победу в этой войне одержал советский человек! Спасибо все, кто отдал свои жизни, здоровье и пот для этой победы!
А американским и британским политикам, с их двуличными планами, стоило открыть второй фронт раньше!
Но мы то знаем, чего запад хотел на самом деле! Чёртовы переписчики истории!
Слова Советскому Народу Освободителю!!! Смерть фашистам и нацистам!
Они так-то с фашистами воевали с 39 года еще на разных фронтах, когда сталин с ними были ближайшими союзничками и чуть ли не в десны целовался.
Лечись, если бы не помощь от США в виде ленд-лиза то ссср прекратил бы своё существование ещё бы в 1943 году, чего только стоят операции союзников в Африке, западной Европе и освобождение Италии, битвы в тихом океане. Пока ссср еле еле воевал отправляя мясо на убой с заградительными отрядами.
permission to share min
Feel bad for those with Apple+ just paying bad CGI show lol but other than that it seems like a good show
P-51 best airplane of the....
投下された爆弾は水平方向には爆撃機と同じ速度で移動しているから、爆撃機が速度や方角を変えない限り、着弾するまで爆撃機の真下に爆弾が見える。爆弾は垂直方向には重力加速度がかかるから地上から見ると放物線を描いて落ちてくる。
つまり爆弾を標的に命中させるためには、爆撃機の高度、速度そして標的までの距離の３点を計算しなければならない。空気抵抗は無視。
No one can doubt the bravery and sacrifice of these airmen in the war. I grew up in the 1950s and must have built a plastic or balsa model of 20 different types of WW2 airplanes.
But:
It is well known that the strategic bombing of Europe was a waste of lives and treasure. It accomplished virtually nothing to shorten the war. Hitler's armnamen minister, Albert Speer said so in his memoirs and the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survery after the war agreed. If you think about the little damage done to London by German bombesr or from the buzz-bombs and V2s the message is the same. Winning a war takes "boots on the ground" and control of natural resources. All that the bombing does is make people angry. Ask the Ukranians.
Yes because Albert Speer definitely did not have a bias of his own and definitely did not just make stuff up to make the allies in the bad light. Whether you like it or not strategic airstrikes heavily impacted the war. Factories, oil rigs and bridges being destroyed will severely hurt the military capability of the enemy. Bombs can easily be manufactured, while destroyed roads and other infrastructures takes a significant time and resources for the enemy slowing them down even further. Aerial supremacy is still an integral part of every military in the world. Boots in the ground is why the eastern front was bloody and aerial supremacy is why the western allies have significantly lower casualties than the soviets
Target Berlin
Berlin, the capital of Germany, was selected as a prime target for the AAF, not only for its industrial importance, but because it was believed the Luftwaffe would react in force to defend it, suffering heavy losses in the process. The first attack was made on March 4, 1944, but only 29 bombers reached target because of weather.
Two days later, 660 AAF heavy bombers reached Berlin in the face of tremendous opposition; 69 bombers and 11 escorting fighters were lost -- the AAF claimed 179 German planes destroyed. The AAF returned on March 8 and 462 bombers, escorted by 174 P-51s over the target, bombed the Erkner bearing factory; again, the Luftwaffe lost heavily.
National Museum of the USAF
No mention of the R.A.F. then ?
What the Star wars sequels should have been
Bruh - compare this with that of Greyhound
The greatest fighter of WW2 was the Mk9 Supermarine Spitfire. Great vid though
僕のイメージでは、P-51DがB-17編隊をエスコートし出したのは、銀翼のB-17Gの頃だと思ってたけど、本当に動画の様にF型の時に達成できてたのかな？確か最初は、P-38やP-47が全航程は、無理でも大半をエスコト出来てた様な？F型の頃は、フランス海岸線辺りまでスピットファイアーがエスコートしてたイメージです。
None of the 51’s dropped their wing tanks going in to intercept..they always did that at once
Lmao! The CGI sucks.
The heroic music on 1000s dead and Berlin destroyed is a bit weird. Well yes it needed to be done, because of Nazis, but they could have put a bit more tragic into the music. A terrible thing that needed to be done. And gladely has been done. But probably also children and women died in these explosions. For my taste the heroic uplifting music choice at the end is bit too optimistice forgetting the cruelty of war. And that always ALL nations loose many sons, children, fathters, mothers, family members. Unimageneable suffering. The Nazis of course started...
Just imagine this music with people on the ground dying in cruel ways cut into the scene...
Yeah I had the same thought. Really making German people look like they don't matter at all.
Lil friends?😁
Jman
The Revenge of the Siths (Temu version)
The CGI was awful in this. I mean you couldn’t tell that the 17s were fake. But it was pretty blatantly obvious that the P 51s and most of all the bombs were all fake. And don’t even get me started on the terrible explosion effects of the actual bombs hitting the city.
After the masterpieces that were band of Brothers and the Pacific, I have to say I’m not exactly pleased with what I’m seeing with this one.
Parts of the CGI were terrible, but not all.
Right? The bomb explosions were terrible!!!!
@@justin36004 Some of the CGI was passable, most of it was laughably bad.
Good thing their masters of the air because they definitely not the masters of CGI
video game adaption plz
No friendly fire???😮
The Mustang was certainly the best escort fighter, i.e. able to first fly 400 miles and still have enough fuel to dog fight and get back home. However, and staying in Europe, once engaged in a dog fight, the FW190 and the Spitfire Mark9 and beyond were superior. The Spitfire Mark14, was the best pure dogfighter of WW2.
The thing about the Mustang was: While there was always some other aircraft that could beat it in any particular area, it did it all almost as good as any of them, close enough that often the pilot/tactics made up the difference - plus it did it all with those long legs. In other words, the best dogfighter, best ground attack fighter, best interceptor, "best-whatever-other-category-you-can-think-of" may have been another aircraft, but the P-51 could be a close second in all categories, but with enormous range - that made it the best all-around fighter.
@@LuisSoto-ho5fw Good enough and the legs to get there? Sure. But that is not always the argument. The biggest variable with the Mustang is that by 1944, most of the Luftwaffe was made up of green and undertrained pilots, and that made a big difference. Nonetheless, one on one, at 10,000 feet, full tanks, the Spitfire Mark 14 (and a couple of later Marks) would be the favorite against any other plane. Note: I say this even though my old man flew Mustangs in the late 1940s before transferring to jets. He loved the plane.
"p51-mustang by far the best fighter plane of the war"
Yet BF-109's later models outclassed it.
British spitfire later models also outclassed it.
America was always behind on aircraft design. theirs only worked so well because of how many they had.
Lmao cite your fucking sources then buddy. The P51 and all of America’s fighters were better and more advanced than any country you just mentioned. We had the best production and the economy to back it.
Outclassed in what? Nothing lmao the p51 was better than all those models you just mentioned.
It's being said by an American pilot of course he's going to be biased
@@israeliairstrikeonyourhous2068 p-51 had slow turn rate and a max speed about half of that of a spit fires.
in what way were they better? lmao
@@AOD_AnkGrooger again, cite your sources lmao. And you through in the bf-109 in there like we wouldn’t notice. You’re just jealous of untouchable American air power
Forget the CGI politics and enjoy the dang movie
What was the P-51 doing in 1939? 1940? 1941? 1942? Only started performing in '43 with a British engine....
Ever heard of research and development? The only reason they got the Merlin engine is because it was a joint venture.
@@andsoiderparound9909the Merlin? Not originally a joint venture far as I know, the USA licensed it sure, but it was 100% British design work.
@@alexanderrees1882 I’m talking about the aircraft not the engine. Since the British use the Mustang first in combat.
Britain would have been wiped out without the US, so stfu, were allies for a reason
This episode take place in March 1944
Unless those are 100 lb bombs this is inaccurate in order to make it to Berlin and back the B17 had to replace 1/2 of it's bombs with extra fuel and even a full load was not 20 1,000 Lb bombs max load was 8,000 Lb's and 4,000 to Berlin remember the B17 was a pre war design
Locks like Star Wars not like WWII. Or was WWiI earlier?
what the fuck is this scene? Is that the ENTIRE LUFTWAFFE? lmao absolute ahistorical nonsense. If you gonna do fantasy why don't you add 1,000 more bf-109s to the mix so it looks more "epiiiiicccc broooo"
also gotta love the google maps cgi with some bomb effects added, let me guess this show also cost like $1 billion to make?
Too much complaining and less enjoying the show.
Yeah I agree. People be complaining just about everything nowadays, smh
Why would I enjoy watching the glorification of a terrorist campaign? These bombing campaigns are no different than those over Gaza. The Germans selectively bombed naval and air facilities in Britain until Churchill instigated the terror war by targeting Berlin. This is of public record. Also, don't bother bringing up Warsaw or Rotterdam. Warsaw was a defended city under siege, while the attack on Rotterdam was a successful attempt to force the war with the Dutch to end before thousands more would die in battle.
@@EricNapoli-z3d All I was saying was, people spend so much time complaining instead of enjoying the show and while I somewhat agree with your points, respectfully they are not needed. What's been done has been done. We cannot change that. People die everyday, whether in wars, famines, sickness, starvation, or accidents, all is equal in death. Nothing we can about it but move on.
You can't enjoy something? Then don't waste your time hating those who enjoy it and simply move on. Find something for yourself to enjoy. Have some peace, God bless you.
@@mazuro-ni Would you enjoy watching a movie glorifying Turks exterminating Armenians, or a TV show glorifying Russians persecuting Circassians or Manchurians? Your comment makes no sense, it is wrong to enjoy media which is hostile to humanity.
@@EricNapoli-z3dif gaza was anything like this there would be no gaza. these bombing raids were massive and unlike isreal, just terror bombing no precision whatsoever
This is how Western mankind was ruined. This was awful that war.
Why there smoke trails?
I believe they're vapour trails or contrails.
Which is typical in high altitude flights.
I read the comments first and yea, it just got worse as it went on