Assault, Criminal Force & Hurt are stages in chronological order. All three terms are defined separately and are different. They are the stages leading to the commission of a crime and might affect differently. Assault is a preparatory act which causes apprehension of use of criminal force but may not require the actual use of criminal force. It creates a fear in the minds of the victim, of violence against him, as intended by the accused. The moment criminal force is used, there act is beyond assault as it causes motion or change in motion or cessation of motion, without consent. Thus, the motion if further leads to any pain or bodily injury such result is known as hurt as defined under section 319 of penal code. Hence the offence is termed as hurt when the injury or pain is caused and these are stages of committing an offence 🙏🙏
1. The gravity of hurt is higher than of criminal force. 2. A person when hurt suffers from severe bodily pain but in criminal force bodily pain is not necessary. 3. Both are non-fatal crimes 4. The ingredients of hurt are bodily pain, disease or infirmity whereas the ingredients of criminal force includes intention, knowledge and harm or fear or annoyance. 5. Gravity chain : Murder>culpable homicide>grievous hurt>hurt>criminal force>force
Difference between hurt and criminal force: 1. Hurt can be unintentional or without knowledge whereas both are necessary ingredients of criminal force 2. Hurt may result into bodily pain, diseases or infirmity whereas criminal force will cause injury, fear or annoyance 3. Hurt is punishable only when done voluntarily whereas in criminal force there is no such thing as voluntary or involuntary.
bodily pain....vs...injury...(ab injury to body ki bhi ho skti h...reputation ki bhi...mindset ki bhi....)....to bodily pain or injury ka difference smjh se bahar h thoda
Fan of you sir. That is the power of edgucation it breaks all the hateful wall. I love you more than my teachers sir. The best thing you are at; to articulate every topic in very simplified way. What a skill of teaching you have sir can't thank in words. . Thank you brother
In hurt define in section 319,& here ingredients is bodily pain,disease or informity & in criminal force (350) it's important to change the motion of anything to prevent (means use force)other movements, so it's different between hurt & criminal force.......
Criminal force creates motion, or change in motion or cessation of motion without consent...if such motion further leads to any physical pain or bodily injury then it is Hurt
Btw criminal force doesn't vary the Motion force does it ...And if such change of motion leads to physical pain or injury then that itself is criminal force used... Then where is the difference ma'am?
i am preparing CLAT through these video, just realized that this is not under clat syllabus but i am blessed with so much info that i cant stop watching these videos. Thank u sir. edit : Hurt VS Criminal Force, Mens Rea and Apprehension are 2 main differences between the two. *Hurt does not mention Apprehension and Mens rea is not that important* Whereas, in case of *Criminal force both Mens Rea and Apprehension are important ingredients which make up what we call Criminal force.*
I've been watching ur videos from three years And ur videos are so informative and i find it so easy to understand Thankyou for making law subjects so easy to understand
Difference between hurt and criminal force : Hurt- bodily pain, disease and infirmity to any person is necessary. Criminal force- only using force, intentionally and knowingly that it will cause......., causing any bodily harm is not necessary (only intention and knowledge is enough) Hurt: must result in bodily pain etc Criminal force: use of intentional force is enough.
Criminal force is reason and hurt is the result. Criminal force may be to cause injury, fear, or annoyance to the person to whom it is applied. When such Criminal force has been applied to cause injury (bodily pain, disease, or infirmity) to that person. it will be hurt. Hurt can be caused by the application of criminal force only, but a Criminal force can be applied even without causing hurt to the person to whom it is applied. All criminal forces may not always cause injury to the person instead may cause fear or annoyance. It is also pertinent to note that in both the cases, intention must be present. In Criminal force, presence of intention is clearly mentioned. But in the definition of hurt (319) or grievous hurt (320), intention is not mentioned; still hurt and grievous hurt are only punishable under Sections 323 and 325 respectively when applied to a person voluntarily (with intention).
Thanks a lots.. never seen such a wonderful videos with easy explanation with conceptual matter... very useful for net aspirants... it will be more benifitial if u make more videos for covering the syllabus ...it’s urs greatness that you sharing urs knowledge 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👌👌👌👌
1.Criminal force me injury, fear and annoyance h.....injury( sec. 44 ) can be of property reputation physical and mental. 2. Hurt only consists of physical pain like bodily pain, disease and infirmity. 3. Criminal force - absence of consent is a must. 4. Hurt - consent ho bhi skta h or nahi bhi.
Difference between Criminal Force and Hurt. Criminal force is making other person worry that some unpleasant is going to happen with him/her in future. Hurt is a bodily injury and thus making the other person inable of an organ of that person to perform in normal circumstances.
Hurt is when a bodily pain is sustained and criminal force is when a force is applied for a motion or to cess the motion that can annoy, injure, or create fear in another person, it can be something related to the person except of his body like- if the person is walking with his god and someone shows a harming gesture, it can create a apprehension of risk to his pet.
Hurt- sec 319 of the ipc 1860 (hereinafter ipc) defines hurt as whoever reasons bodily pain disorder or disease to any man or woman is said to have caused harm the sec does not outline the offence of inflicting harm bodily pain. Infirmity to another disease Criminal force- whoever intentionally uses force to any person without that person consent in order to the committing of any offence or intending by the use of such force to cause or knowing it to be likely that by the use of such force he will cause injury fear or annoyance to the person to whom the force is used is said to.........
hurt- causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to another person criminal force -intentionally use force on another person in order to commit offence with prior intention of causing harm to that person without consent. assault- gesture or preparation to any person with knowing that person is going to apprehend it as the person is going to use criminal force to that person.
Criminal force - intention or knowledge to cause injury, fear or annoyance Injury as per section 44 Hurt intents to cause Pain , desease and infirmity all are conditions where force may be used or not , like giving toxic/poisoned food leading to bad health will be hurt
Criminal force is basically the use of force without others' consent in order to commit any offence ,injury, fear, or annoyance to that person .... Hurt is basically the bodily injury.. Criminal force is the prior stage of offence and Hurt is the ultimate results of it. Criminal force may cause harm to any person's body, mind , reputation or property. But hurt is only bodily injury. So criminal force have wider scope than Hurt.
Criminal Force... word starts with "Criminal" hence question of intent is 100% established... n ends with "Force" which is outcome of contact - be it direct or indirect... whereas Hurt can have elements of intention or knowledge, any of it, n in Hurt physical contact, again, be present or absent... one may say Criminal Force looks like subset of Hurt... but it's not... as in Criminal Force presence of both, offender n victim, is required at the place of offense at same time... whereas in Hurt collision of "presence and time" is not the point of discussion.. that's my understanding... happy to learn if wrong or missing some dimensions...
Hurt comes in sec 319 of ipc and criminal force comes in sec 350 Major diff in hurt and criminal force is when we see That hurt is physicall pain But in criminal force there is only used force.
Sure, I can explain the difference between criminal force and hurt. In the context of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), both criminal force and hurt are offenses that involve causing harm to another person, but they have distinct elements and consequences. Criminal force, as defined in Section 350 of the IPC, refers to the intentional use of force against another person without their consent or lawful justification. It involves acts such as assault, wrongful restraint, or wrongful confinement. The key element here is the use of force against someone against their will. On the other hand, hurt is defined in Section 319 of the IPC. It refers to causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity to another person. Hurt can range from minor injuries to more serious harm, depending on the circumstances. The element of intention is also present in the offense of hurt. To summarize, criminal force involves the intentional use of force against someone without their consent, while hurt involves causing bodily pain or harm to another person. Both offenses are treated as separate offenses under the IPC and carry their own legal consequences. I hope this clarifies the difference between criminal force and hurt in the context of the Indian Penal Code.
Criminal Force is causing motion, change of motion or cessation of the motion without the consent of the person, in order to commit an offence or intending to cause or knowing it will cause injury, fear or annoyance. When the use of such criminal force results in causing of bodily pain or injury, then it would amount to the offence of 'Hurt' under Section 323, Indian Penal Code.
In hurt, there is bodily pain, any disease or infirmity caused to any person but in criminal force- the force cause injury,fear or annoyance . Bodily hurt may be caused by many acts which are not assaults example- a person who mixes a deleterious poison and place it on another's table or digs a pit in public path intending that another may fall into it & cause serious hurt.
Criminal force is the intentional use of physical force against someone, while hurt is the actual injury or harm caused by that force. In short, criminal force is the action, and hurt is the result of that action.
Clear difference between Hurt and Force is the motion caused by Force if further leads to any pain or bodily injury such result is known as hurt as defined under section 319 of penal code. Whether it was intentional or not is relevant for deciding punishment. Hurt has a higher gravity of crime over Force.
"hurt" refers to any bodily pain, disease, or impairment of physical or mental condition. "Criminal force" involves any force unlawfully applied to a person without their consent, with the intention of causing injury, fear, or annoyance. While hurt encompasses the result of physical harm, criminal force pertains specifically to the application of force with malicious intent, regardless of the outcome.
As its the word own defines the term, that is hurt is not a criminal force, (grievous hurt may be), and the criminal force is applied with higher degree of mens rea and actus reus. All the factors such as intention , knowledge differs in both, criminal forces contains all these factors at higher level. P.s - i don't know i m right or not , please correct me if i m wrong.
Criminal Force- Beyond assault and ends up with motion, change of motion or cessation of motion. Hurt- Starts with motion and ends with battery (Injury)
hurt aur assult mei 1 diff ye hai ki force can affect substance also but hurt can only have affect on person. 2nd hurt mei assault jaise koi gesture aur apprehension nahi hone wala woh direct hoga. assult 1st stage hai hurt ha hurt 2nd stage hai. isse simple nahi hogi force is any kind of illegal touching...1st stage. that is called battery. hurt is when that illegal touching gets severe. 2nd stage.
In many cases it has been held that physical contact is not a necessary condition for hurt as defined by section 319, and even shocking the victim enough to induce by any way bodily pain would be enough to bring the said act under the purview of Section 319 that defines the offence of Hurt. (Kindly refer the book on IPC by KD Gaur and check out the topic of hurt, he has mentioned the relevant leading cases supporting this line of thought of the court).
Criminal force is the process to cause hurt Ex - maine usse dhakka dia ( criminal force)usse chot lgii( hurt) criminal force intentional hoti but hurt unintentional ho skta h
Grievous hurt - emasculation+permanent loss eye, ear, head, limb, joint, face, tooth +20 days pain / endanger to life Criminal force - by bodily power Disposing substance/ person manner motion / change/cession in motion Intentionally Without consent Cause fear, annoyance, injury to other
bhai vo samjhane ke chakkr me apna gya pel diya thoda sa...😂😂😂😅😅 Ohk to video dekhne ki zaroorat nahi hai itna mast smjhaya hai...aapne... Mein abbi dusra comment karke bata ta hu...jo mujhe ek hi difference samjh me aata hai fir to😅😅😅😅
Hurt is Act causing bodily pain, disease and infirmity. - only body se related hai Criminal force causes fear and annoyance also along with hurt .(mental takleef bhi hai yaha) Hurt only to body Use of Criminal force may only cause fear and annoyance and no bodily damage
In Hurt causes body pain , disease, or infirmity but In criminal force use force will cause injury, fear and annoyance and a major difference In criminal force is knowledge
Sir aapka samjhane ka tarika bohot cool hai. Bas wo naali wale scene mein volm. badha hua tha. Darr gyi 😅 edit: eg.- spitting can be criminal force but not hurt (unless intention/knowledge to carry disease)
Difference between criminal force and hurt is tht criminal force is always refer to voluntary harming somebody and the other side hurt is voluntary as well as non voluntary harming.
In hurt their is bodily pain or decide to person In criminal force their is knowledge about using force and intending or knowingly harm ,injury or fear is their and their is without consent
The major difference between hurt and criminal force is that, in hurt(Sec319)the offender knows *that it's* likely to cause hurt whereas in criminal force (sec 350) offender knows that *it will* cause injury to the person. I think *it will* in Sec 350 make more sense and the degree of knowledge is more than as compare to Hurt.
In hurt intention is immaterial whereas in Criminal Force, Intention of the person is mandatory! A simple push by a person can make it liable for criminal force!
dono hi non fatal crimes hai bass hurt ka gravity jyada hai .hurt mai bodily pain ,disease ya atleast infirmity ho to bolenge ki hurt hua pr sirf fear ya annoyance bhi ho to criminal force lg skta h . also koi aadmi hurt hoga to uspe criminal force use hua hi hoga pr ye jaruri ni hai ki kisi pe criminal force use ho to wo hurt ho ji jaye.
Sir first of all Thank you so much for giving such a simple lecture on these topics. Hummmmm aapka video aaj dekhe hai and am trying to answer the difference between Sec.319 Hurt and Sec. 350 Criminal Force. 1. In hurt there is only causing of bodily pain, disease or infirmity but criminal force is said to be applied where there is cause of injury, 'fear' or annoyance. 2. In 319 there is no any mention of word intention but 350 is applicable where there is any intention by use of such force to cause not only just injury, but even 'fear' or 'annoyance'. 3. Sec. 319 only include causing of the act but sec 350 also includes intention and knowledge of doing such act. (Sec. 319 needs only Actus Reus and Sec. 350 needs both Actus Reus and Mens Rea)
difference between hurt and annoyance: bodily injury , disease and infirmity in case of hurt but in case of criminal force{battery} also include the mental aspect that is fear and annoyance
Criminal force will be applicable when a person causes fear,injury or annoyance but in case of hurt a person must cause bodily pain,disease or infirmity.Hurt is more serious offence than Criminal force.
Sir, in hurt there is only actus reus and no mens rea involved whereas in criminal force the main ingredient is mens read i.e. the criminal intent and sir in hurt it is necessary that there must be either bodily pain, disease or infirmity should be caused whereas in criminal force even a slight fear, annoyance or injury can be caused.
Hurt can be caused with consent as well whereas to constitute criminal force it shall be without consent. Further, for hurt bodily injury is the only necessary ingredient whereas for criminal force, along with bodily injury, fear and annoyance are important too. Section 350(criminal force) also pays attention to the intention of the person causing criminal force.
The main difference is in the ingredients, HURT - Bodily Pain, Disease, Infirmity Criminal Force - Causing Fear, Injury, Annoyance In hurt, you cannot take the plea that I was annoyed, but you have to be suffering from Bodily pain
According to section 350 for criminal force there is necessary that any person cause motion, change of motion or cessation of motion to that other or any substance but in hurt motion is not a essential element.
Criminal force is used to committing an offense which cause fear, injury or annoyance on the other hand hurt is an offense that causes injury, disease or infirmity.
Can you please explain why the punishment of Assault and Criminal force are clubbed together in section 352? Please plot the relationship between these two, and can you please explain that, is it necessary that assault is the key element of Criminal force or vice versa?
Hurt means bodily pain to another person punishment upto 1 year and fine Grevious hurt means ie if a person brakes bones of another person upto 7 years and fine Criminal force means If a person spit on another person is called criminal force ie if a use substance towards another person with an intention to committed an offence.
In hurt, bodily pain, infirmity or disease is caused as a result of the action whereas in criminal force, injury, fear or annoyance is caused/is likely to be caused.
In hurt there is no gesture needed but in criminal force only showing gesture to use criminal force will cause assualt. And no apprehension is needed in hurt but in criminal force it is must
@@YGLAW hmm!! Seriously,Your way of explanation is tremendous and different from all others. Keep with us. Stay with us. And yes,The difference is,In Hurt there is bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person. While in C.F,it is excavated form of force and narrowed in comparison to Hurt.
Hurt mein bodily injure hona yaa disease hona yaa infirmity hona intending or knowingly hota hai aur criminal force mein aap kisi k motion ke against usko push karte ho
I think the most important difference is the consent In hurt there's no with or without consent But in criminal force if the force used to another person without his consent then only it is criminal force otherwise it's just force
what if kisi ne consent se bhi di...or usne criminal force use ki jisse us person ko heavy injury cause ho jati h....to ye exception m nhi aaega na ki usne to consent di thi....ye to NON-COMPOUNDABLE offence ki tarah h...consent ke baad kaam wo krna chahiye jisse REASONABLE APPREHENSION / KNOWLEDGE ho aapko ki us consent se jo aap act kroge...uska result kya hoga
Assault, Criminal Force & Hurt are stages in chronological order. All three terms are defined separately and are different. They are the stages leading to the commission of a crime and might affect differently. Assault is a preparatory act which causes apprehension of use of criminal force but may not require the actual use of criminal force. It creates a fear in the minds of the victim, of violence against him, as intended by the accused.
The moment criminal force is used, there act is beyond assault as it causes motion or change in motion or cessation of motion, without consent. Thus, the motion if further leads to any pain or bodily injury such result is known as hurt as defined under section 319 of penal code. Hence the offence is termed as hurt when the injury or pain is caused and these are stages of committing an offence 🙏🙏
Maja aa gaya well explained
Very well explained sir. Thank you
Thank you
1. The gravity of hurt is higher than of criminal force.
2. A person when hurt suffers from severe bodily pain but in criminal force bodily pain is not necessary.
3. Both are non-fatal crimes
4. The ingredients of hurt are bodily pain, disease or infirmity whereas the ingredients of criminal force includes intention, knowledge and harm or fear or annoyance.
5. Gravity chain :
Murder>culpable homicide>grievous hurt>hurt>criminal force>force
Difference between hurt and criminal force:
1. Hurt can be unintentional or without knowledge whereas both are necessary ingredients of criminal force
2. Hurt may result into bodily pain, diseases or infirmity whereas criminal force will cause injury, fear or annoyance
3. Hurt is punishable only when done voluntarily whereas in criminal force there is no such thing as voluntary or involuntary.
Voluntarily means with intention or knowledge
And criminal force includes intention or knowledge
Yes @Pallawi you are right at this point.
bodily pain....vs...injury...(ab injury to body ki bhi ho skti h...reputation ki bhi...mindset ki bhi....)....to bodily pain or injury ka difference smjh se bahar h thoda
Fan of you sir. That is the power of edgucation it breaks all the hateful wall. I love you more than my teachers sir.
The best thing you are at; to articulate every topic in very simplified way.
What a skill of teaching you have sir
can't thank in words. . Thank you brother
Hats off to you man...... respect hai tumhare liye..... easiest possible way me kisi bhi concept ko explain krte ho and with speed 👏👏👏
In hurt define in section 319,& here ingredients is bodily pain,disease or informity & in criminal force (350) it's important to change the motion of anything to prevent (means use force)other movements, so it's different between hurt & criminal force.......
Criminal force creates motion, or change in motion or cessation of motion without consent...if such motion further leads to any physical pain or bodily injury then it is Hurt
Wowww Yaar Nalin
@@sanyamparmar2941 thanks bro
Accurate 💯.....can I get you number I want to learn more from you ...more concept clearity .
Btw criminal force doesn't vary the Motion force does it ...And if such change of motion leads to physical pain or injury then that itself is criminal force used... Then where is the difference ma'am?
@@rahultomar6478 🤣
i am preparing CLAT through these video, just realized that this is not under clat syllabus but i am blessed with so much info that i cant stop watching these videos. Thank u sir.
edit : Hurt VS Criminal Force, Mens Rea and Apprehension are 2 main differences between the two.
*Hurt does not mention Apprehension and Mens rea is not that important*
Whereas, in case of
*Criminal force both Mens Rea and Apprehension are important ingredients which make up what we call Criminal force.*
Um clat has IPC principle based questions
Keep it up sir yg law will rock.. Keep on working ur contact is much in simpler way that explain basic element of a topic .....god blesss
I've been watching ur videos from three years
And ur videos are so informative and i find it so easy to understand
Thankyou for making law subjects so easy to understand
Difference between hurt and criminal force : Hurt- bodily pain, disease and infirmity to any person is necessary.
Criminal force- only using force, intentionally and knowingly that it will cause......., causing any bodily harm is not necessary (only intention and knowledge is enough)
Hurt: must result in bodily pain etc
Criminal force: use of intentional force is enough.
Just a push is enough enough for Criminal force. Right?
Kya samjhaya hai. Salute 🙋🏻♀️
sir yg law is explaining every topic with such ease that it gets automatically easy.
Maan Gye guru kya zabardast padhate ho ho koi nahi hai tumhare jaisa TH-cam par👏🏻👏🏻
HURT focus mainly on the injury caused & CRIMINAL FORCE is about using the force with bad intention even if no physical injury caused.
One can Hurt other by bodily or mentally But criminal force is only be by bodily touch to injure someone.
Koi kaise aise smjha skta h 🥰❤ wow...keep working sir....lot of blessings from our sides.
Criminal force is reason and hurt is the result. Criminal force may be to cause injury, fear, or annoyance to the person to whom it is applied. When such Criminal force has been applied to cause injury (bodily pain, disease, or infirmity) to that person. it will be hurt. Hurt can be caused by the application of criminal force only, but a Criminal force can be applied even without causing hurt to the person to whom it is applied. All criminal forces may not always cause injury to the person instead may cause fear or annoyance.
It is also pertinent to note that in both the cases, intention must be present. In Criminal force, presence of intention is clearly mentioned. But in the definition of hurt (319) or grievous hurt (320), intention is not mentioned; still hurt and grievous hurt are only punishable under Sections 323 and 325 respectively when applied to a person voluntarily (with intention).
Thanks a lots.. never seen such a wonderful videos with easy explanation with conceptual matter... very useful for net aspirants... it will be more benifitial if u make more videos for covering the syllabus ...it’s urs greatness that you sharing urs knowledge 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👌👌👌👌
Arre bhai that assault kabir singh part🙌🙌🙌op
Arjun reddy part
As kabir singh is a remake
1.Criminal force me injury, fear and annoyance h.....injury( sec. 44 ) can be of property reputation physical and mental.
2. Hurt only consists of physical pain like bodily pain, disease and infirmity.
3. Criminal force - absence of consent is a must.
4. Hurt - consent ho bhi skta h or nahi bhi.
The way your explanation is adorable
In Hurt infirmity disease or body pain hota h Wd knowledge or intentions
In criminal force motion fear or annoyance and intentions to use force ...
Difference between Criminal Force and Hurt.
Criminal force is making other person worry that some unpleasant is going to happen with him/her in future.
Hurt is a bodily injury and thus making the other person inable of an organ of that person to perform in normal circumstances.
Your videos are very informative and helpful
U explained a serious subject with such an ease 👍
Hurt is when a bodily pain is sustained and criminal force is when a force is applied for a motion or to cess the motion that can annoy, injure, or create fear in another person, it can be something related to the person except of his body like- if the person is walking with his god and someone shows a harming gesture, it can create a apprehension of risk to his pet.
Hurt- sec 319 of the ipc 1860 (hereinafter ipc) defines hurt as whoever reasons bodily pain disorder or disease to any man or woman is said to have caused harm the sec does not outline the offence of inflicting harm bodily pain. Infirmity to another disease
Criminal force- whoever intentionally uses force to any person without that person consent in order to the committing of any offence or intending by the use of such force to cause or knowing it to be likely that by the use of such force he will cause injury fear or annoyance to the person to whom the force is used is said to.........
My ans is effective and crystal clear sir????
Reply me pls🙏
hurt- causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to another person
criminal force -intentionally use force on another person in order to commit offence with prior intention of causing harm to that person without consent.
assault- gesture or preparation to any person with knowing that person is going to apprehend it as the person is going to use criminal force to that person.
you're videos are amazing sir .....big respect for you
Criminal force - intention or knowledge to cause injury, fear or annoyance
Injury as per section 44
Hurt intents to cause Pain , desease and infirmity all are conditions where force may be used or not ,
like giving toxic/poisoned food leading to bad health will be hurt
Your videos are very interesting and easy to understand I have my exams tomorrow and your videoes are really helping me a lot❤🥰
Criminal force is basically the use of force without others' consent in order to commit any offence ,injury, fear, or annoyance to that person ....
Hurt is basically the bodily injury..
Criminal force is the prior stage of offence and Hurt is the ultimate results of it.
Criminal force may cause harm to any person's body, mind , reputation or property. But hurt is only bodily injury. So criminal force have wider scope than Hurt.
Criminal Force... word starts with "Criminal" hence question of intent is 100% established... n ends with "Force" which is outcome of contact - be it direct or indirect... whereas Hurt can have elements of intention or knowledge, any of it, n in Hurt physical contact, again, be present or absent... one may say Criminal Force looks like subset of Hurt... but it's not... as in Criminal Force presence of both, offender n victim, is required at the place of offense at same time... whereas in Hurt collision of "presence and time" is not the point of discussion.. that's my understanding... happy to learn if wrong or missing some dimensions...
Hurt (Section 319): Causing physical pain or harm.
Criminal Force (Section 350): Using 'force' to cause "injury, fear, or annoyance" 'intentionally'.
Hurt comes in sec 319 of ipc and criminal force comes in sec 350
Major diff in hurt and criminal force is when we see
That hurt is physicall pain
But in criminal force there is only used force.
Sure, I can explain the difference between criminal force and hurt. In the context of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), both criminal force and hurt are offenses that involve causing harm to another person, but they have distinct elements and consequences.
Criminal force, as defined in Section 350 of the IPC, refers to the intentional use of force against another person without their consent or lawful justification. It involves acts such as assault, wrongful restraint, or wrongful confinement. The key element here is the use of force against someone against their will.
On the other hand, hurt is defined in Section 319 of the IPC. It refers to causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity to another person. Hurt can range from minor injuries to more serious harm, depending on the circumstances. The element of intention is also present in the offense of hurt.
To summarize, criminal force involves the intentional use of force against someone without their consent, while hurt involves causing bodily pain or harm to another person. Both offenses are treated as separate offenses under the IPC and carry their own legal consequences.
I hope this clarifies the difference between criminal force and hurt in the context of the Indian Penal Code.
Criminal Force is causing motion, change of motion or cessation of
the motion without the consent of the person, in order to commit an offence or intending to cause or knowing
it will cause injury, fear or annoyance. When the use of such criminal force results in causing of bodily pain or injury, then it would
amount to the offence of 'Hurt' under Section 323, Indian Penal Code.
In hurt, there is bodily pain, any disease or infirmity caused to any person but in criminal force- the force cause injury,fear or annoyance .
Bodily hurt may be caused by many acts which are not assaults example- a person who mixes a deleterious poison and place it on another's table or digs a pit in public path intending that another may fall into it & cause serious hurt.
Criminal force is the intentional use of physical force against someone, while hurt is the actual injury or harm caused by that force. In short, criminal force is the action, and hurt is the result of that action.
Clear difference between Hurt and Force is the motion caused by Force if further leads to any pain or bodily injury such result is known as hurt as defined under section 319 of penal code. Whether it was intentional or not is relevant for deciding punishment. Hurt has a higher gravity of crime over Force.
"hurt" refers to any bodily pain, disease, or impairment of physical or mental condition. "Criminal force" involves any force unlawfully applied to a person without their consent, with the intention of causing injury, fear, or annoyance. While hurt encompasses the result of physical harm, criminal force pertains specifically to the application of force with malicious intent, regardless of the outcome.
Sir you are teach just awesome🤩🤩🤩.....day by day am a big fan of you....🥰🥰🥰🥰
And i am a fan of you, keep watching, keep commenting :D never thought ill have fans :)
As its the word own defines the term, that is hurt is not a criminal force, (grievous hurt may be), and the criminal force is applied with higher degree of mens rea and actus reus. All the factors such as intention , knowledge differs in both, criminal forces contains all these factors at higher level.
P.s - i don't know i m right or not , please correct me if i m wrong.
Criminal Force- Beyond assault and ends up with motion, change of motion or cessation of motion.
Hurt- Starts with motion and ends with battery (Injury)
Late ho gya ho Ane me but.....really smj aya and mst lecture tha
Hurt is done by bodily pain, disease and infirmity to another but criminal force is only about change of those motions which is defined under 350
CF : higher degree of mens rea
H : non-fatal crime
6:30 that "Shreeman" was personal 😂😂
hurt aur assult mei 1 diff ye hai ki force can affect substance also but hurt can only have affect on person. 2nd hurt mei assault jaise koi gesture aur apprehension nahi hone wala woh direct hoga. assult 1st stage hai hurt ha hurt 2nd stage hai. isse simple nahi hogi
force is any kind of illegal touching...1st stage. that is called battery. hurt is when that illegal touching gets severe. 2nd stage.
Very very nice teaching sir ji ,great
Hurt and Grievous hurt requires physical contact while Assault requires gesture and apprehension in the mind of the other person.
In many cases it has been held that physical contact is not a necessary condition for hurt as defined by section 319, and even shocking the victim enough to induce by any way bodily pain would be enough to bring the said act under the purview of Section 319 that defines the offence of Hurt. (Kindly refer the book on IPC by KD Gaur and check out the topic of hurt, he has mentioned the relevant leading cases supporting this line of thought of the court).
@@MayankSharma-kz5ep that's a good insight....I will refer book and case studies for better understanding!
Nicely explain do carrrrrrrrry on, good luck
Criminal force is the process to cause hurt
Ex - maine usse dhakka dia ( criminal force)usse chot lgii( hurt)
criminal force intentional hoti but hurt unintentional ho skta h
Grievous hurt - emasculation+permanent loss eye, ear, head, limb, joint, face, tooth +20 days pain / endanger to life
Criminal force - by bodily power
Disposing substance/ person manner motion / change/cession in motion
Intentionally
Without consent
Cause fear, annoyance, injury to other
bhai vo samjhane ke chakkr me apna gya pel diya thoda sa...😂😂😂😅😅 Ohk to video dekhne ki zaroorat nahi hai itna mast smjhaya hai...aapne... Mein abbi dusra comment karke bata ta hu...jo mujhe ek hi difference samjh me aata hai fir to😅😅😅😅
Hurt is Act causing bodily pain, disease and infirmity. - only body se related hai
Criminal force causes fear and annoyance also along with hurt .(mental takleef bhi hai yaha)
Hurt only to body
Use of Criminal force may only cause fear and annoyance and no bodily damage
In Hurt causes body pain , disease, or infirmity but In criminal force use force will cause injury, fear and annoyance and a major difference In criminal force is knowledge
Sir aapka samjhane ka tarika bohot cool hai. Bas wo naali wale scene mein volm. badha hua tha. Darr gyi 😅
edit:
eg.- spitting can be criminal force but not hurt (unless intention/knowledge to carry disease)
Difference between criminal force and hurt is tht criminal force is always refer to voluntary harming somebody and the other side hurt is voluntary as well as non voluntary harming.
Enjoyed yours words 😂❤ never thought that it will be so that easy to understand thank you.. Bhaiya ji big fan hogya apka Sakal b dekah doh
Great bhiya nice and knowledgeable vedio
Thanks a lot sir for explaining even difficult topics in such easy language.
In hurt their is bodily pain or decide to person
In criminal force their is knowledge about using force and intending or knowingly harm ,injury or fear is their and their is without consent
Thank you Sir,it was so helpful 🙏
The major difference between hurt and criminal force is that, in hurt(Sec319)the offender knows *that it's* likely to cause hurt whereas in criminal force (sec 350) offender knows that *it will* cause injury to the person. I think *it will* in Sec 350 make more sense and the degree of knowledge is more than as compare to Hurt.
In hurt intention is immaterial whereas in Criminal Force, Intention of the person is mandatory!
A simple push by a person can make it liable for criminal force!
Super deliberated sir😎
What a explanation 🔥🔥
❤ great
dono hi non fatal crimes hai bass hurt ka gravity jyada hai .hurt mai bodily pain ,disease ya atleast infirmity ho to bolenge ki hurt hua pr sirf fear ya annoyance bhi ho to criminal force lg skta h . also koi aadmi hurt hoga to uspe criminal force use hua hi hoga pr ye jaruri ni hai ki kisi pe criminal force use ho to wo hurt ho ji jaye.
The most basic and easy difference is hurt has a higher gravity than criminal force!!
Criminal Force is used to cause fear or annoyance. (No injury necessary)
In case of Hurt Bodily Pain or Injury is necessary.
Sir first of all Thank you so much for giving such a simple lecture on these topics. Hummmmm aapka video aaj dekhe hai and am trying to answer the difference between Sec.319 Hurt and Sec. 350 Criminal Force.
1. In hurt there is only causing of bodily pain, disease or infirmity but criminal force is said to be applied where there is cause of injury, 'fear' or annoyance.
2. In 319 there is no any mention of word intention but 350 is applicable where there is any intention by use of such force to cause not only just injury, but even 'fear' or 'annoyance'.
3. Sec. 319 only include causing of the act but sec 350 also includes intention and knowledge of doing such act. (Sec. 319 needs only Actus Reus and Sec. 350 needs both Actus Reus and Mens Rea)
difference between hurt and annoyance: bodily injury , disease and infirmity in case of hurt but in case of criminal force{battery} also include the mental aspect that is fear and annoyance
Criminal force will be applicable when a person causes fear,injury or annoyance but in case of hurt a person must cause bodily pain,disease or infirmity.Hurt is more serious offence than Criminal force.
Criminal force is first stage of hurt...and in hurt... injury caused..while in criminal force annoyance,and injury fear caused
Sir, in hurt there is only actus reus and no mens rea involved whereas in criminal force the main ingredient is mens read i.e. the criminal intent and sir in hurt it is necessary that there must be either bodily pain, disease or infirmity should be caused whereas in criminal force even a slight fear, annoyance or injury can be caused.
the way u teach ,,next level #YGLAW
Hurt can be caused with consent as well whereas to constitute criminal force it shall be without consent. Further, for hurt bodily injury is the only necessary ingredient whereas for criminal force, along with bodily injury, fear and annoyance are important too. Section 350(criminal force) also pays attention to the intention of the person causing criminal force.
The main difference is in the ingredients,
HURT - Bodily Pain, Disease, Infirmity
Criminal Force - Causing Fear, Injury, Annoyance
In hurt, you cannot take the plea that I was annoyed, but you have to be suffering from Bodily pain
According to section 350 for criminal force there is necessary that any person cause motion, change of motion or cessation of motion to that other or any substance but in hurt motion is not a essential element.
Criminal force is used to committing an offense which cause fear, injury or annoyance on the other hand hurt is an offense that causes injury, disease or infirmity.
Criminal force is the cause, hurt is the effect. In other words, hurt is done when criminal force is complete.
Can you please explain why the punishment of Assault and Criminal force are clubbed together in section 352?
Please plot the relationship between these two, and can you please explain that, is it necessary that assault is the key element of Criminal force or vice versa?
In hurt there is no intention of committing the offence ...
But
In criminal force ,offender use force without consent in order to commit the offence
You r the best sir well explained
Hurt means bodily pain to another person punishment upto 1 year and fine
Grevious hurt means ie if a person brakes bones of another person upto 7 years and fine
Criminal force means If a person spit on another person is called criminal force ie if a use substance towards another person with an intention to committed an offence.
Hurt caused by criminal force
Hurt is result
Criminal force is process
In hurt, bodily pain, infirmity or disease is caused as a result of the action whereas in criminal force, injury, fear or annoyance is caused/is likely to be caused.
In hurt there is no gesture needed but in criminal force only showing gesture to use criminal force will cause assualt.
And no apprehension is needed in hurt but in criminal force it is must
Continue sir. .one day u wii be one great u tuber...of law....
Aapke mu main ghee shakkar, aapki umar 100 saal ho.
Kya baat kahi hai, wahhhh
Maza aa gaya 😄
@@YGLAW hmm!! Seriously,Your way of explanation is tremendous and different from all others. Keep with us. Stay with us.
And yes,The difference is,In Hurt there is bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person.
While in C.F,it is excavated form of force and narrowed in comparison to Hurt.
Hurt me thoda moda chot v lag sakta lekin assault me bas aisa gesture samne wala deta hi ki dusra aadmi darr jata hi lekin kuch chot wot ni lagta😁
Awesome way of explaining
There is a difference of intensity b/w these two. Criminal force have lesser degree of intensity than hurt.
Im glad you exist
Hurt mein bodily injure hona yaa disease hona yaa infirmity hona intending or knowingly hota hai aur criminal force mein aap kisi k motion ke against usko push karte ho
In hurt body infirmity, body pain or disease occur .
But in criminal force injury ,fear or annoyance is likely to occur
I think the most important difference is the consent
In hurt there's no with or without consent
But in criminal force if the force used to another person without his consent then only it is criminal force otherwise it's just force
what if kisi ne consent se bhi di...or usne criminal force use ki jisse us person ko heavy injury cause ho jati h....to ye exception m nhi aaega na ki usne to consent di thi....ye to NON-COMPOUNDABLE offence ki tarah h...consent ke baad kaam wo krna chahiye jisse REASONABLE APPREHENSION / KNOWLEDGE ho aapko ki us consent se jo aap act kroge...uska result kya hoga
Hurt is non fatal (koi marega nahi) whereas Criminal force is fatal crime where it may cause death.