I am a drone operator for a large Sheriff's department, certified law enforcement officer, and a part 107 pilot. Everything he talks about in this video is spot on. If I am conducting CUAS at a large open air event and come across someone with a 107 AND they are flying right, ill frequently help them get better shots or tell the other cops in the area to let them be. I now also frequently get calls from repeate commercial pilots that will be flying for large events letting me know that they will be there. Do they have to do that? No. Does it make their life way easier? You bet and I'll even escort them into take off locations; they otherwise would never have been given access to in the first place. Key point to remember: cops don't like paperwork, if I can have a conversation instead of doing a report, I will ALWAYS have that conversation. We are still human and most of us are always learning, a little politeness goes a long way with interactions and most of the time gets far better outcomes.
I hear this more and more that people are advising the police that they are flying drones. Could you provide an example as to when calling the non emergency number to give a heads up is appropriate?
I have my part 107. I have no desire to do any commercial drone work. I fly for fun and relaxation. I did the part 107 to be as educated as possible and fly my drone safely. I do post some videos to TH-cam but only to share with friends and family. I appreciate your rules videos and look forward to your content. Having the part 107 gives me the confidence to fly and not be overly concerned with anyone that might approach me. Keep up the good work.
I have a Part 107. Did it just for the challenge. My favorite non-FAA “rules” are, 1. Get as far away from people as you possibly can. 2. If you are not able to get away from people have a conversation with the people in your flight path before you take off. (Not always possible) 3. Just because you can does not mean you should. If there is a potential for a confrontation avoid it. All that said the FAA does not bother me as much as local government that see fit to enact drone restrictions/laws out of lack of knowledge and fear of the dreaded Drone Spies.
A non-FAA government entity has absolutely NO authority over the airspace. They can legally enact laws/ordinances that prohibit takeoff/landing sites. In other words, if a city prohibits UAV operation in/from/to a city park, but not otherwise within the city boundaries, you'd be fine to fly over the park (in compliance with FAA UAV regulations) if you were controlling, taking off & landing from one foot outside the park.
When I started flying drones I went all in. I enjoyed learning about manned aviation and all the rules. I hated to see so many people breaking the rules and tried to promote drone safety in my local community. Unfortunately no one really cared. The airport did nothing to help promote my safety classes as well as the city. To make things worse, I have seen so many instances where the drone community has been harassed by local authorities, taken to court to fight whatever unlawful fine, seizure of drone, and the FAA is nowhere to be found. They will fine you, but they won't stand up and defend you. So with that all said, I do not promote unsafe flying, but I don't fault anyone for doing what they need to do to get their pic or video. If I NEED to fly out of visual line of sight or the like, I will. I still believe in being responsible, but it's tough to reconcile not being backed up by the FAA.
I'm a little late to this video but an added bonus to educating the Drone Community is that it helps prevent "Stupid." As in "Play Stupid games, win Stupid prizes." The "Stupid Prizes" being new bans & laws that limit our freedoms. Now go edumacate yerselves & fly smarter!
My experience with quadrotor drones started last year, when my employer dropped two boxes full of electronics parts on my desk and said "See if you can make this fly again". Since then, I've been absorbing all sorts of information from channels just like yours. One thing that's nice is once I got the drone to fly, they offered to help me get my 107. Since I've started that journey, I've really started to pay attention to airspace, and I know where all the small airports are in my area. I hope I can continue to be safe, both with the flying scrap metal I was given at work, and my own more tame DJI drone.
You shouldn’t need a Part 107 to make money with a drone. We don’t have to remind people to get a driver’s license because the consequences of misusing a car are OFTEN catastrophic. Tens of millions of UAV flights per year occurred before Part 107 was ever put in place. How many disasters occurred? The whole thing is absurd. People are surprised that you have to get a license, because it doesn’t make any sense.
I'm taking my test Friday. Even 75% through the course it is clear how easy to go over the line of recreational vs part 107. Plus the learning about air space and airports , weather very cool
I haven't flown my MA2 in months, partially because of all the rules and possible negative interactions with people, but I'm looking to get back into it. You uploaded this just in time
@@m118lr I always update the firmware when it shows that theres a new one available, and I make sure to check if I haven't flown in a while and I'm going out somewhere
the rules are not as bad as you think. and as long as you know the rules people will not have a say what or how you fly. good thing is the FAA always takes the flyers side. cops never mind also and take the pilots side as well in my experiences. Karens that only fuss
@@belovedLion80 Thats good to know. In my case, I'm a generally shy/introverted person and its just a struggle of wanting to fly but also avoiding trouble. To be fair, most people I have encountered here in central Florida are nice while I'm out at parks and trails and even wave to the drone or ask me questions about it. If I do run into someone telling me I can't fly somewhere that I am allowed to fly in, I would definitely take the time to respectfully educate them on the laws of drone flying and all. But if they still didn't like it, I think it would be a case "just because it is legal doesn't mean you should do it", as in, I would probably stop flying in that area anyways to stay on good terms with everyone and avoid potential negative attention to the hobby. I am a hobbiest photographer so I see the drone as just another tool in my arsenal for different perspectives, and in that sense it does bewilder me when I see people freaking out in other videos or news articles like its the end of the world lol.
I’ve looked hard into getting a part 107. But so many questions will nvr come into play for real world drone flight. I think the FAA should dumb it down so to speak. Make it where it pertains specifically to drones & drone flights. I like being a recreational pilot. Don’t need the extra money. Most I know that fly could care less about part 107. It’s a personal preference I guess. From my observations it seems there are way more hobbyists and can fly legal, safe, smart & fly just as good as part 107 pilots. I keep in mind all part 107 pilots had to start as a hobbyist. More power to them for making money as a drone pilot hence Part 107. Great video Russ good topic for discussion.
I watch all your videos… and I love how much you talk about drone rules. I have my part 107, and yet I still have questions about rules or forget things. So having these videos is awesome to constantly refresh my memory. Thank you Russ!
I totally agree with your opinion. If the part 107 exam was totally drone oriented I believe more hobby pilots would be interested. I just don't find trying to determine what runway some fixed wing aircraft is using and what the wind direction and speed might be of interest to the casual drone pilot. Part 107 program needs revising.
@@scotthuguley3082 🛫📖🛬 You are spot on 🛑! Common sense should surfice all drone pilots not to do stupid things; Ignorance can be fixed, But "stupid" is without remedy!
@@scotthuguley3082 that is dumb. They take those test WORD FROM WORD from the PAR test (test for private pilots, although only less than 10% of what actual pilot needs to know). They haven't updated them in a LONG TIME. I also had some weird questions in my actual pilot test (the PAR, which is just the first test, one of many, then there is IRA, CAX, FIA, FII, and FOI, and others but usually these 6 are what you need to go into airlines). But you do need to know how wind affects your drone. Even a 3mph wind can affect your drone. They teach you this so you don't fkn lose control and fly into controlled airspace and or crash into someone. If you know how wind affects a plane during takeoff or landing for example, you'll understand how wind affects your toy. Just an fyi
The FAA should not be so lazy and uncreative. They should design aircraft specific certifications and tests that apply in the real world and more people would participate. I earned a sport pilots license years ago to legally fly a powered parachute in rural farmland. I had to test on such things as how to position a tail dragger airplane in a crosswind on a taxiway and flight parameters of jetliners at 25,000 feet. Many many questions that could never possibly apply to what I was doing. It’s akin to being required to know how to pilot and maintain a yacht or oil tanker simply to pilot your bass boat up a river.
@@RVingwithG Drone Zone page has all the info your looking for like Ruffstuff138 said.It states all drones under 55 pound must be registered and the PIC if flying commercially, (making money) also needs a part 107 certificate.
This is one if my major issues with drone regulations for recreational pilots and some of the questions on the 107 test. I'm a part 61 and part 107 pilot. I had no problem passing the 107 test since I was already familiar with much of the material (airspace classifications, aviation weather, etc.) but viewed some of the questions as really unnecessary information for drone pilots. I also thing the regulations for recreational pilots is much to complicated and does little if anything to enhance safety.
Your car vehicle license is a great analogy. Should we 100% follow the rules? Yes. Do we? no But you know if you are in an accident and you were not following the rules, you know where liability lies. Same with the drone rules. They are there for a reason. I try to be very conscientious of others, structures, situations and so on for a safe flight. Let's all try and do better. As will I.
Love your channel! I'm taking a course for my part 107 as we speak. At the last South Florida Drone meet up, 4th year, I won a course with Pilot Institute. As I was exposed from 18 up to 28 to flying. I'm a sky diving instructor. Do most of the terms and theory I know. 6,999 one way flights and holding. Anyway drones infected me almost 5 years ago. 8 drones in, I'm taking the next step. I think it's a great idea for you to have a membership. I for one, will be subscribing. Thank you for your channel. Very easy to follow ad retain information. Drone On!
@@FigProductions28k did you take it yet, I take it Friday... From all the different practice tests I can't easily see a trick questions with a sectional charts, giving answer in AGL vs MSL or MPH vs knots... If asking how high can you fly in a certain area with a tall obstruction / tower in a layered air space.. For example you are hired to inspect a tower that's 900 AGL, you are in class E air space that is depicted with that magenta gradient looking line. You will get answers with different AGL's. The trick here many will have in their head oh I can fly AGL of the tower (900)+ 400 feet and 1300 AGL will be option A. Option B will show up to but not including 700 AGL. Option C some other answer.... In this case if you choose A you will be wrong because that magenta gradient ( if the tower is on the inside) is telling you the class E begins at 700 AGL. So that's your limit, so B would be your answer.
Russ, I understand, and agree with the premise of the message you are trying to convey. However, I don’t think part 107 should even exist in the first place. We are not flying complicated high speed machines in heavy traffic to need a license like driving a vehicle. Yes, there is risk, but no more than anything else out there. Public perception seems to be the main driving force for advocating for a part 107 as to make it seem like we are better responsible pilots than those that don’t have their 107. In my experience this is not always the case. The part 107 is essentially a license to conduct business with a drone for compliance and to keep it somewhat controlled. I get that aspect of it. I try not to kid myself (not implying you are) in actually thinking it’s because the “hobby” is saturated with rouge untrained and unsafe drone pilots that “ruin it for the rest of us”. These rules and laws were going to be created regardless of actual incidents or accidents because there hasn’t really been any to warrant such strict regulations. Unfortunately, safety (and maybe good intentions) is the go to to enact new laws and regulations, but in reality safety ends up being the byproduct of whatever the real reason is. I have love and respect for you and your channel. These are just my opinions.
Just the fact that you study and pass the part 107 exam makes you a better and safer pilot. You are much more aware of the dangers and things that can get you or others into a dangerous situation and how to avoid them.
@@haphartmann3394 you would think so, but driver’s licenses have proved that theory wrong. How many have driver’s licenses and still don’t know how to drive.
For the MOST part, I agree. I don’t believe the FAA should be ANOTHER “revenue-PRODUCING” arm of the .gov when it comes to ALL drone pilots..like when it’s a FAMILY member OR friend asking for a “project” to be completed and requires footage or video utilizing a drone. In other words, NOT A COMMERCIAL venture as we commonly know it. ‘Hiring it or leasing’ it out is a different story. Contracts can/may be drawn up, etc. It’s about MONEY AND INTRUSION..PERIOD.
Sorry, but I completely disagree. There have been many near misses with manned aircraft as well as actual collisions. I'd suggest a lot of these are because of ignorance (or arrogance) on the part of the P.I.C.
I live out in the country and fly in empty ballparks and fair grounds. The few times i did talk to cops they knew what it was from missing or lost persons searches. The county sheriff said they found the one person in 15 mins with an IR camera drone. So they are getting familiar. I stay away from everyone and everything without a part107. But if i want to do a side gig i need the 107.
We have an expression in the military, "How do you know what rules you can bend/break if you don't know what the rules are?" So the reality is, do you get caught everytime for speeding? No, of course not. But that ONE time is all it takes, and you'll wish you had it. Ask the dude who had a flyaway with his DJI in Vegas and it landed at the airport. Bet he wishes he can get back that fine the FAA threw at him.
Question hoping you can help with Russ. Part 107 here and I’ve been filming an office complex demolition. It’s 1.2 miles from a Class D airport. I’ve had no issues whatsoever in getting an automated LAANC approval for up to 50’ at the site and have had no issues in getting the DJI geozone unlocking approval with the LAANC approval I supply DJI. Most of the office complex is 2 stories high, so the 50’ altitude approval is fine. There is however a 10 story high office tower that I would like to capture the demolition of. I think I can legally fly up to 50’ above the roof of the building (I would actually like to fly only as high as the building itself) if I stay within 200’ of the building. If that is the case, how do I get the DJI unlocking license to grant me that additional altitude around that building? Right now it truly limits my drone flights from going higher than 50’. Thanks for any insight you may have.
I shoot real estate and very early on, I trained with a couple of photographers who said they didn't have the 107, at the time anyway. One rarely did drone work and the other, quite often. And both got their drone photos and/or video at the very end of the shoot. Get in & get out mindset. Super quick, always less than 5 minutes. And they never had any issues whatsoever. Highly knowledgeable, respectful, competent, never flying any higher than necessary, and never did anything that would draw attention to themselves. I don't do drone work, but I can understand why people with very little to no free time don't get their 107. From most accounts, this test has very little to do with piloting and safety. It's about revenue and control.
I just joined your new group. I have been watching your TH-cam channel for about a year have appreciated your practical approach. I am in favor of the regulations as they provide context in the development of common sense flying skills. I am a retired builder who specialized in home renovations, and I have made a great deal of money repairing faulty construction. Regulations create a level playing field and promote the skill that drone flying requires. I look forward to more of your videos.
I am a Realtor and have my Part 107. I use my videos on my various websites to drive traffic to them as well as for my listings. I decided to get my Part 107 when I became aware that my videos would be considered commercial by the FAA. It was watching a Milesdeep video that enlightened me.
I also completed a course to obtain my 107, however when I went to take my test the price went from 65 to 175. Trying to make a little cash on the side, check the cost of insurance. I now know the rules, if the government would make the fee reasonable more would obtain their 107
Thank you for starting a members page. I think the more info that we can receive will make us all better and safer drone operators. I just got my part 107 look forward to starting a business. Look forward to seeing what you have for us members.
I fly a Mavic 2 Pro for fun and commercial Real estate, I do have a Mavic mini two as well and I have both registered with the FAA and I am a part 107 holder. I do appreciate the information and it is very important. Keep up the great work!
Russ been waiting for you to offer a membership. I appreciate the time you spend making each video and have been trying to figure out a way to help support all the help you have given. Glad to be a member of your channel.
THIS is my weekly struggle, but I haven't had anyone tell me "Nah, I'm good" as most are just blown away at what the rules say. Last week, I flew in Sedona and my wife's friend came along and I took about 30 mins to educate him. In the end, he said he needs to get his cert because he has obviously been putting himself at risk.
My closest neighbor is like 3 miles away. Closest "metro" area like 56 miles, so needless to say, even though I'll try to follow the rules, it doesn't impact anyone if I break them flying in my back forty. Honestly, I'd be a little hesitant if I lived where people, planes and trains were.
It's like playing jazz music... you have to know all the rules of music really well so you know when it's appropriate to break them. Otherwise, it's not music, just noise. Any nobody wants noise.
The people who makes these drone laws dont know sht about drones. I fly 3 to 4 miles out but i keep my drone under 400 ft so not to hit any manned aircraft. I fly over people but like 300ft over them. Not fly 5 feet over peoples head. I fly how i want as long as i fly safe.
After watching this video and seeing some of the comments about the 107 I have decided to sign up for the course. I was flying my drone getting some practice shots of a lighthouse in my home town when I was approached by the keeper of the lighthouse said I was not allowed per the coast guard I was pretty sure that the coast guard does not control this but also the area is not restricted at all, I truly think if I was a licensed pilot it would have made a difference I did not argue with the gentleman I spoke with him a bit and packed up.. but great video I truly enjoy the way you communicate
Hello Russ, Brilliant video and instructional highlights for knowing and learning the UAV rules and regulations. As you mentioned, I fly by the rules, and we all make mistakes. I've had my membership for a couple of years, and finally, this year, I'm going to buckle down to study and take my Part 107 exams. Thank you for this tiny nude to get me back on track to complete what I started to do. Thank you for starting up the membership section, and wish you all the best. I've just upgraded my membership and joined.
I never took any of your content as being "preachy" or whatever, just informative. Keep it up! Your videos are always good. Diggin the newer background layout, by the way.
thanks so much. agree with many folks brand new to drones. it's bitter cold bout since Christmas so I've not had much flight time. the analogy to drives Ed. is great. I do want to learn more, and be safe. so while maybe once it's warmer and I get a few more flights under my blt I'll look more into my 107 and subscription to the channel
I'm a new drone operator, and learning. I am working on getting my 107. I do have a rules question. A rule I think I'm breaking. Flying over vehicles. We shoot offroad action shots. A couple of my shots sometimes involve flying over vehicles or driving under a hovering drone. These are my own vehicles... or vehicles that belong to people I'm travelling with. Am I violating the rule or am I in a grey area because these are people I'm travelling with who are involved in the production?
Russ, Thank you for what you do. Your video are invaluable to the furtherance of the drone industry and are greatly appreciate. Keep up the great work. Largo, FL
Just finished my Part 107 training and am now working to schedule the test, although I have no plans to fly my drone commercially. Once I'm 80 feet in the air, my DJI Mini 3 Pro is often out of my visual line of sight, as it's so tiny and relatively quiet. Regardless, I do my best to follow the rules. I use LAANC, I use an app to check local aircraft traffic, and I listen to my scanner for air traffic. I feel that there's value to getting a Part 107 certification, even for those of us who have no plans to fly drones commercially. An education is never wasted.
There is never a reason not to be well educated. I'm not a drone owner but will be eventually and these videos will help me be prepared for what I need to know. Thank you and keep them coming. Better to be educated than ignorant.
Russ, quick idea: Why not re-name your channel with your name? Something like Stuart & Alina (Carroll) did. You have a cool, alliterative name; why not use it! Cheers, good brother. 💛🙏🏼
I’m getting my 107 this year. I have a business startup idea and people I can market my service to if licensed. It’s a good idea if not just for the information you can learn around airspace rules and flight restrictions. But being able to make money on it and not having to worry about the Powers that be swooping in and causing problems? Worth it.
The FAA rules are pretty straight forward. It’s the various state and local laws that are annoying. My state requires you to get an additional permit after you have your 107 in order to be “legal”.
As someone who is about 50% through a Part 107 course via Pilot Institute I must say, there is so much good information not only to help you be a better drone pilot but to be more aware of conditions. Plus it helps separate you from the average drone pilot because you can backup what you say. 💪🏽 Here’s to 2022 making some side cash with our drones!💸 Loving the updated look with the setup Russ.😎
Just recently found your channel. Bought a Mavic Mini 2 and learning all sorts of new stuff. It's good to know the rules so that you at least know when you're breaking them. So I appreciate your education videos on flying, LAANC, editing, checklists, and more.
Totally agree with you Russ - I am in the UK where the certification is different, i.e. A2 Cofoc & GVC, + EU Complaint Insuranc,,,, and have taken the courses/licenses and dangle those badges from my lanyard when flying - It helps a lot with public perception, and helps me to be a safer more responsible drone pilot. Prior to these CAA - Certs (FAA equiv) I was flying oblivious to many inherant dangers, even crashed twice because of. Not saying I'm perfect now, just that it's better, and the public tend to leave you alone instead of moaning. A big thumbs up for this vid Russ,,,,, great topic. 👍
Hi Russ, First off, I just want to say many thanks for all your knowledge and expertise and sharing it with all of us! So, I'm a brand new drone owner and was hoping you could help me with a question concerning my; lets call it "do the right thing", "civic duty" maybe...I'm teetering between registering my Mini 3 Pro with the FAA or not. I didn't buy this drone with a weight limit as a factor in my purchase and the 5 dollar once every 3 years isn't an issue. After watching several videos on conflicts between drone pilots and law enforcement, would it be any advantage for me to be able to at least say to an officer "Yes sir, I am registered with the FAA and I'm trying my best to uphold all the FAA and COB rules as a recreational pilot". One other thing, if I did register w/the FAA, would that also force me to have to register w/ the state and local authorities...which happens to be a 25 dollar annual fee even as a recreational pilot. I guess what I'm saying, is I don't want to be viewed as some dirtbag just trying to skirt around the laws and get away with not being a responsible drone flyer...any input would be appreciated. Thanks again!
I have a 107 because we have an RV travel channel, but following the rules within 107 are still challenging, I use air control before i fly but many of the places we go are in no fly zones. Getting the 107 was easy, no reason for somebody making money from droning not to get their 107, just lazy and cheap. The only reason i check in with this channel is rules to follow. I fly a 3 year old drone, i dont have upgrade fever. Interested to see how your memberships go. Larry
I'm really new to drones. I haven't started the process of getting my part 107 yet but it is definitely in works. First though, I just want to be able to fly well enough that it at least looks like I know what I'm doing. I want to be as legal and knowledgeable as I can as well. I've also been watching a lot of drone related content here on TH-cam. The question that always pops up to me is how these people are flying within the rules. There's no way many of them are flying line of sight. I also see people flying FPV without a second person as well. I see other things also. I can understand how many people don't care about the rules when they see their favorite content creators openly flaunting them. Others, as you say, just don't care. However, all it takes is one person to complain or for something to happen and they could get a visit from the FAA.
3:07 You can fly a paramotor 10,000 feet in the air with no license, but you need a license for a drone? I miss the days before people ruined things and now they have all these laws. I have remote control cars... why would I need a license for that? Why can't people just fly remote control planes and helicopters in peace?
I live in Canada and fly my drones two to three times a week, I'm retired. I suspect that our rules are about the same as the rules in the USA.When I purchased my first drone I got my basic licence to pilot a drone and I registered my drone. When I did my test to get my drone pilot licence I was surprised to some degree that the test had more questions about fixed wing aircraft than about drones. The licence expires in two in two years and then you have to take another test to renew your licence. It takes much more experience and knowledge to get a driver's licence and that is good for five years. The two year rules is BS. I don't always follow the rules especially the line of sight and nobody else does either. In all this time I have flying my drone never met a drone pilot that has his or hers drone pilot license as the vastlicense expired I didn't renew it because the test doesn't relate to flying a drone. If you know the rules and are a responsible pilot you do not need a licence.
Totally agree. I had my licence in Canada a few years back then everything changed. I use my drone for my business to take overhead shots of progress. I don’t sell them they are only for me. I like you registered again when rules changed but only for hobbiest. I fly in the country for fun but when in town or city I’m up and down in minutes and packed up. I never go to fairs, outdoor gatherings as that is dangerous and just stupid. So at this point I’m not going to get a licence in Canada of US.
I am a Multi Licensed private pilot with 48 years of flying. Yes the sectional charts are a bit of a confusion. Even have to carry an new one in my seaplane. Did the old school with a plotter and speed wheel. Also an avid R/C pilot and drone owner. I obey all of the rules for each. A quote we use is " The FAA is not happy, until You Aren't ". Fly Safe.
New to the channel and interested in purchasing a drone. I plan to take the 107 test before buying one. Something I have not heard mentioned in my very short experience with drone TH-cam videos. No one discusses liability. What are the insurance requirements and needs. Requirements meaning what should a responsible person do? Do insurance companies offer discounts if you have a 107 license. Is the impact greater if using it for commercial gain?
Hey Russ you touched on a lot of good points.. Also personal crap that I have experience with.. if you ever want interview me about what happened and what's the outcome I would be on board with that.. no biggy though.. just throwing it out there . Thx Russ.
If I have a mini 2, which is under the 250g limit for registering the drone or whatever, I dont need the part 107, right? (Have no plans to do a side hustle with it, just an occasional flying time on weekends or whenever I have time)
The FAA should make Part 107 about drones, things related to it and affordable. If we have to pay $150 + to fly recreational it will turn into a rich-people hobby.
You don't need 107 purely for recreational flying, you do need the TRUST certificate, which is free and easy. Recreational flying comes with a lot of restrictions, like flying under a CBOs safety guidelines, you can't even gift aerial photos or video to someone who will use it commercially. Part 107 gives you a lot more freedom, but for purely recreational flying TRUST is all that is required. (Both TRUST and Part 107 also apply to old-school RC airplanes and helicopters, it's not just multirotor)
@@ericapelz260 I'm referring to a hypothetical case of a mandatory Part 107 for All drone pilots regardless of commercial or recreational use of a drone.
Excellent points. Where I live we do not need a certification unless purely commercial or over a park / government land. That said, to be legal, I took my A2 for both UK and EU when I travel there. Best to avoid drama on vacation I say. The nice thing was I was able to take the A2 for both online but FAA 107 I cannot. Maybe someday!
I agree with you 100% and I have to follow the rules since I live near a local airport and the planes fly around the same height as my drone so I know I need to be careful.
🛫📖🛬 Russ, The membership format makes more sense. All of your patreon members could just transition to the membership acct. I for one would like to support you by becoming a member. Your channel is really one of the best, because of your down-to-earth approach. You are a good communicator and your laid back body language puts everybody at ease. GOD bless 🛐✈️🐆🐆🐆
Its always a refresher and keep up to date with the rules and changes to those rules on a category of a need a refresher of rules a couple of weeks ago a drone pilot decided to fly their drone during the Bengals vs raiders NFL playoff and didn't either know that there's a no fly zone this is an example why on that front why rules need to be followed on that front but need to be educated on the rules or a refresher course about why you shouldn't be flying drones during outdoor professional sporting events
Yes you should always attempt to follow the rules. Yes, unintentionally I have lost visual line of sight do to sun glare or whatever the case may be, but I didn't intentionally lose VLS and if it happens I do a immediate return to home until I visually spot my drone. Yes, I have unintentionally flow over 400 Feet because of a updraft lift in the wind currents but the second I realize I descend in my altitude. Do I think the FAA is out to bust people like me? No, I don't because we take immediate action to correct the situation. Do I think the FAA will bust people who intentionally disregard the rules and behave in a reckless manner? Absolutely! Yes, we do need rules and regulations and I don't have any issues playing by them.
Part of the problem is the rules are so arbitrary. Why a limit of 400 ft, regardless of airspace when an unlicensed paramotor or experimental aircraft pilot can fly to 14,000 feet in unrestricted airspace? Why is visual line of sight or a spotter required when I can see far better with HD goggles than any spotter or someone flying without goggles at the extreme of their visual sight using a camera drone and flying los? Why are they implementing a plan to track exactly where I am standing when I fly when an experimental aircraft is not even required to carry adb-s and a terrorist would definitely never use a tracker if using a drone to attack? Many of the rules just seem like something pulled out of a hat or somewhere else.
I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND&AGREE w your intent &why ur making the point! With this awesome position you've established for yourself & as your audience expands, monetization etc, it's only common sense that it would be your moral responsibility to include this helpful content! It's like grammar- or manners/etiquette-- it's ok to speak however you want, using improper semantics or choosing to put your elbows on the dining table or not placing napkin on your lap, but if you're in an interview or a formal speaking/eating situation, you damn well better know how to speak & write properly and compose yourself or show appropriate courtesy in presence of ppl /places that matter. So, If you're going to invest or be active in the fabulous world of drones, you best be educated&informed on safety &laws! What you DO with that is another thing. Btw, i love your content & tell "Blavid', he could be a better supporter to his friend!!! ❤❤😊
I really and truly appreciate your informative videos. I’ve been wanting to get my Part 107 but I’ve been procrastinating. I’m gonna work on getting it with the information that you provide so that i can make some extra income. Thanks a million. 👍
As a police officer for 42 years I fully enjoyed your driving analogy. The only thing I have to say is that it is important to remember that if you choose to bend or break the rules, you must be prepared to accept the consequences if something goes wrong. Trust me, the last thing a cop or court will listen to is “everybody else does it’!
Let me ask you this. If you see a person flying there drone. Would you go over and start asking "Cop questions" to find out if that drone pilot is following the rules or not. I've seen it too many times that the police get involve for no reason or any suspicious activity. Rules still apply to you as well. If you have no reason or suspicions Then I don't have to talk to you nor do I have to show you anything. So move along Cop
@@draggerlane04090 Dude. No reason to be antagonistic. You don't even know this person, yet your approach is as if they wronged you in some way? Not cool.
@@draggerlane04090 Being a smaller female who worked the streets for that entire time in the PD, running the port security team, fatal crash reconstruction team, and the dive team for 30 of those years, I do not appreciate heavy handed policing any more than you apparently do. According to law and the Supreme Court, I can walk up to anyone and engage them in conversation. If they don’t want to reciprocate, it is entirely their choice. But as a fellow drone operator, I am always interested in their equipment, intent, and skill level, because I most probably will get a civilian complaint and would like to put that civilian at ease right away, thereby avoiding confrontations between resident and drone flyer. 99.9% of us cops are NOT jack-booted thugs, but in fact are interested in keeping our patrol areas safe. Bear in mind that if the drone operator pops off right away with an attitude of “move along, cop”, then it may bear further investigation. I have always had the attitude that I will treat you with the utmost respect until you turn it around. It has always worked for me!
@@51Drones You're right I did come off strong Jill Simmons I apologize for my first comment. However my question is valid. Where I live the Police harass the drone community all the time including me. I have tried to be polite and professional only to be threaten with Jail if I'm caught off my my property. I can't count how many times I have been threaten with that. It has gotten to filing complaints after complaints to nothing being done and other drone pilots threaten the same. It's to the point I gave up fly my drone it's to much a hassle now.
@@51Drones Hey Russ! Thank you for that! My reply to him is the last I will make. He obviously has had a bad experience with the .1% and he apparently sees his way clear to painting all officers with the same broad brush. It’s a shame. I hope he doesn’t do that if he is slighted by some other member of some group and blame them all for the bad behavior of one of them. Anyway, thanks for sticking up for me! I appreciate it.
One of the ones I see where people are probable are not following the laws is when they are flying over the length of rail road tracks and even while thier is a train.
I agree with the message and the benefits of the part 107. I’ve also received a great deal of information from this channel, so I’m not knocking per-se. But I can’t help feeling frustrated that the last three drone videos I watched to learn about any news on the FAA and drones have ultimately just been ads themselves for TH-cam subscription channels or part 107 courses. Here I essentially had to watch one short Google ad, had to skip through another just to watch a 10 minute 51 Drones ad for a paid-for walled subscription channel. :-/
I tried looking up this new paid subscription page you mentioned and I could not find any information. Could you please add the link to this thread. Many thanks.
I think it's awesome Russ, what you plan on doing? Being familiar with the FAA rules is always a bonus. Well, I think it is. I don't fly to make money, I've always flown drones for the love of the sport. I don't plan on making money with my drone either. I understand that it's always a good thing to have, but when someone is sure like me that's not going to use a part 107. What's the use? Believe me, I've thought about it, but just to have it? Nah I'm sure pilot institute is awesome? I always watch their videos. I'm subscribed to both you and them. Thanks again for sharing Russ. I think you're doing a fantastic job. 👍 👍 👍
I got my Part 107, because of you, Russ! (And I'm glad I did...thanks for the inspiration!) And FTR...I have a Mavic Air 2 and Mavic Air 2S (Also, a Mini 2, and Mavic Pro) The 2 I use most; Mini 2 and Air 2S,
If everyone is driving at least 5 MPH over the speed limit, then the speed limit is set too low. If the 'rules' for flying a drone are set in such a way that essentially everyone is breaking some of them at some point, then those are bad rules that need to be rescinded. The way I see it, this is just yet another way for govt. goons to go after people they don't like, and I am sick of it.
Thank your for this video. You mentioned the Drone School you used to pass your Part 107, but said there were only two good schools. Do you mind naming the other good Drone School?
I have my Part 107 License. I do real estate photography using various drones. Since I use them in business I have to be aware of the FAA Rules and controls on flying in different areas and altitudes because if something happens while I'm flying that causes injury or interference with other aircraft the company I work for could be sued. If you're flying within the limits of the regulations and laws your liability is reduced or even protected. I carry my license and a copy of the State Laws that apply to me. I can then provide it to any law enforcement or citizen that questions my right to fly.
Driver’s license in my state is $40, for eight years. 107 costs $175, with no guarantee that you will pass. I’ve been flying for years, and follow all the rules. I have also completed the TRUST certification. I see no reason to give the government money for a 107.
MONEY-BACK GUARANTEED FAA Part 107 Study Course: bit.ly/3APkPo3
Great course! I am about 50% through it and plan to take the test in a couple of weeks.
What is the cost to get your part 107 certification?
@@fredmunson8952 The test cost me $175.00. Passed the first time after reading what I could find on the FAA web site and watching a few TH-cam videos.
@@ericdavis1808 Thank you, this is helpful information.
@@fredmunson8952 $175
I am a drone operator for a large Sheriff's department, certified law enforcement officer, and a part 107 pilot. Everything he talks about in this video is spot on. If I am conducting CUAS at a large open air event and come across someone with a 107 AND they are flying right, ill frequently help them get better shots or tell the other cops in the area to let them be. I now also frequently get calls from repeate commercial pilots that will be flying for large events letting me know that they will be there. Do they have to do that? No. Does it make their life way easier? You bet and I'll even escort them into take off locations; they otherwise would never have been given access to in the first place.
Key point to remember: cops don't like paperwork, if I can have a conversation instead of doing a report, I will ALWAYS have that conversation.
We are still human and most of us are always learning, a little politeness goes a long way with interactions and most of the time gets far better outcomes.
I hear this more and more that people are advising the police that they are flying drones. Could you provide an example as to when calling the non emergency number to give a heads up is appropriate?
As a former law officer in La. I agree, paperwork is repetitive and it sucks.
This is a really good comment. And a very good approach. I appreciate this.
Thank you for being like that you are a great cop, most are NOT like that and look at us as a bother…….
Mad respect for you 🙌 it's all about a person's education on the subject and how they handle the situation.
I have my part 107. I have no desire to do any commercial drone work. I fly for fun and relaxation. I did the part 107 to be as educated as possible and fly my drone safely. I do post some videos to TH-cam but only to share with friends and family. I appreciate your rules videos and look forward to your content. Having the part 107 gives me the confidence to fly and not be overly concerned with anyone that might approach me. Keep up the good work.
Lmao I don't even register if I don't have to. Government doesn't need to know
The FFA does not care about you, you are a nuisance to them if you think otherwise you are delusional.
@@w.e.s. exactly jsut more overreach that the mindless sheeple go along with. its sad to see.
Cool also fly higher
I have a Part 107. Did it just for the challenge. My favorite non-FAA “rules” are, 1. Get as far away from people as you possibly can. 2. If you are not able to get away from people have a conversation with the people in your flight path before you take off. (Not always possible) 3. Just because you can does not mean you should. If there is a potential for a confrontation avoid it. All that said the FAA does not bother me as much as local government that see fit to enact drone restrictions/laws out of lack of knowledge and fear of the dreaded Drone Spies.
Solid advice
A non-FAA government entity has absolutely NO authority over the airspace. They can legally enact laws/ordinances that prohibit takeoff/landing sites. In other words, if a city prohibits UAV operation in/from/to a city park, but not otherwise within the city boundaries, you'd be fine to fly over the park (in compliance with FAA UAV regulations) if you were controlling, taking off & landing from one foot outside the park.
When I started flying drones I went all in. I enjoyed learning about manned aviation and all the rules. I hated to see so many people breaking the rules and tried to promote drone safety in my local community. Unfortunately no one really cared. The airport did nothing to help promote my safety classes as well as the city. To make things worse, I have seen so many instances where the drone community has been harassed by local authorities, taken to court to fight whatever unlawful fine, seizure of drone, and the FAA is nowhere to be found. They will fine you, but they won't stand up and defend you. So with that all said, I do not promote unsafe flying, but I don't fault anyone for doing what they need to do to get their pic or video. If I NEED to fly out of visual line of sight or the like, I will. I still believe in being responsible, but it's tough to reconcile not being backed up by the FAA.
Trust certificate is a drivers license. Part 107 is a CDL. No need to have it unless you need it.
I'm a little late to this video but an added bonus to educating the Drone Community is that it helps prevent "Stupid." As in "Play Stupid games, win Stupid prizes." The "Stupid Prizes" being new bans & laws that limit our freedoms. Now go edumacate yerselves & fly smarter!
My experience with quadrotor drones started last year, when my employer dropped two boxes full of electronics parts on my desk and said "See if you can make this fly again". Since then, I've been absorbing all sorts of information from channels just like yours. One thing that's nice is once I got the drone to fly, they offered to help me get my 107.
Since I've started that journey, I've really started to pay attention to airspace, and I know where all the small airports are in my area. I hope I can continue to be safe, both with the flying scrap metal I was given at work, and my own more tame DJI drone.
You shouldn’t need a Part 107 to make money with a drone. We don’t have to remind people to get a driver’s license because the consequences of misusing a car are OFTEN catastrophic. Tens of millions of UAV flights per year occurred before Part 107 was ever put in place. How many disasters occurred? The whole thing is absurd. People are surprised that you have to get a license, because it doesn’t make any sense.
I'm taking my test Friday. Even 75% through the course it is clear how easy to go over the line of recreational vs part 107. Plus the learning about air space and airports , weather very cool
I haven't flown my MA2 in months, partially because of all the rules and possible negative interactions with people, but I'm looking to get back into it. You uploaded this just in time
Have you been updating the firmware WHEN prompted..or not at all?
@@m118lr I always update the firmware when it shows that theres a new one available, and I make sure to check if I haven't flown in a while and I'm going out somewhere
the rules are not as bad as you think. and as long as you know the rules people will not have a say what or how you fly. good thing is the FAA always takes the flyers side. cops never mind also and take the pilots side as well in my experiences. Karens that only fuss
@@belovedLion80 Thats good to know. In my case, I'm a generally shy/introverted person and its just a struggle of wanting to fly but also avoiding trouble. To be fair, most people I have encountered here in central Florida are nice while I'm out at parks and trails and even wave to the drone or ask me questions about it. If I do run into someone telling me I can't fly somewhere that I am allowed to fly in, I would definitely take the time to respectfully educate them on the laws of drone flying and all. But if they still didn't like it, I think it would be a case "just because it is legal doesn't mean you should do it", as in, I would probably stop flying in that area anyways to stay on good terms with everyone and avoid potential negative attention to the hobby. I am a hobbiest photographer so I see the drone as just another tool in my arsenal for different perspectives, and in that sense it does bewilder me when I see people freaking out in other videos or news articles like its the end of the world lol.
I’ve looked hard into getting a part 107. But so many questions will nvr come into play for real world drone flight.
I think the FAA should dumb it down so to speak. Make it where it pertains specifically to drones & drone flights.
I like being a recreational pilot. Don’t need the extra money. Most I know that fly could care less about part 107. It’s a personal preference I guess. From my observations it seems there are way more hobbyists and can fly legal, safe, smart & fly just as good as part 107 pilots. I keep in mind all part 107 pilots had to start as a hobbyist.
More power to them for making money as a drone pilot hence Part 107.
Great video Russ good topic for discussion.
I watch all your videos… and I love how much you talk about drone rules. I have my part 107, and yet I still have questions about rules or forget things. So having these videos is awesome to constantly refresh my memory. Thank you Russ!
I was looking to join but the link doesn’t seem to be working?
I wish the FAA would make the 107 test more about drones
Try to follow the rules the best you can
I totally agree with your opinion. If the part 107 exam was totally drone oriented I believe more hobby pilots would be interested. I just don't find trying to determine what runway some fixed wing aircraft is using and what the wind direction and speed might be of interest to the casual drone pilot. Part 107 program needs revising.
@@scotthuguley3082
🛫📖🛬
You are spot on 🛑!
Common sense should surfice all drone pilots not to do stupid things;
Ignorance can be fixed,
But "stupid" is without remedy!
@@scotthuguley3082 that is dumb. They take those test WORD FROM WORD from the PAR test (test for private pilots, although only less than 10% of what actual pilot needs to know). They haven't updated them in a LONG TIME. I also had some weird questions in my actual pilot test (the PAR, which is just the first test, one of many, then there is IRA, CAX, FIA, FII, and FOI, and others but usually these 6 are what you need to go into airlines). But you do need to know how wind affects your drone. Even a 3mph wind can affect your drone. They teach you this so you don't fkn lose control and fly into controlled airspace and or crash into someone. If you know how wind affects a plane during takeoff or landing for example, you'll understand how wind affects your toy. Just an fyi
The FAA should not be so lazy and uncreative. They should design aircraft specific certifications and tests that apply in the real world and more people would participate. I earned a sport pilots license years ago to legally fly a powered parachute in rural farmland. I had to test on such things as how to position a tail dragger airplane in a crosswind on a taxiway and flight parameters of jetliners at 25,000 feet. Many many questions that could never possibly apply to what I was doing. It’s akin to being required to know how to pilot and maintain a yacht or oil tanker simply to pilot your bass boat up a river.
>>>>>>PEEPS, I need your help, can some one here SHOW the written "RULE" that we need to REG a 249gm drone because I make money with it??
@@RVingwithG It clearly says on the FAA Drone Zone registration page that all drones used for commercial purposes must be registered.
@@RVingwithG Drone Zone page has all the info your looking for like Ruffstuff138 said.It states all drones under 55 pound must be registered and the PIC if flying commercially, (making money) also needs a part 107 certificate.
Spot on
This is one if my major issues with drone regulations for recreational pilots and some of the questions on the 107 test. I'm a part 61 and part 107 pilot. I had no problem passing the 107 test since I was already familiar with much of the material (airspace classifications, aviation weather, etc.) but viewed some of the questions as really unnecessary information for drone pilots. I also thing the regulations for recreational pilots is much to complicated and does little if anything to enhance safety.
Your car vehicle license is a great analogy. Should we 100% follow the rules? Yes. Do we? no
But you know if you are in an accident and you were not following the rules, you know where liability lies.
Same with the drone rules. They are there for a reason. I try to be very conscientious of others, structures, situations and so on for a safe flight. Let's all try and do better. As will I.
Love your channel! I'm taking a course for my part 107 as we speak. At the last South Florida Drone meet up, 4th year, I won a course with Pilot Institute. As I was exposed from 18 up to 28 to flying. I'm a sky diving instructor. Do most of the terms and theory I know. 6,999 one way flights and holding. Anyway drones infected me almost 5 years ago. 8 drones in, I'm taking the next step. I think it's a great idea for you to have a membership. I for one, will be subscribing. Thank you for your channel. Very easy to follow ad retain information.
Drone On!
Just passed my FAA Part 107 today. Excited to see where this all can go.
Congrats!
Congrats any trick questions? Taking mine this month
@@FigProductions28k did you take it yet, I take it Friday... From all the different practice tests I can't easily see a trick questions with a sectional charts, giving answer in AGL vs MSL or MPH vs knots... If asking how high can you fly in a certain area with a tall obstruction / tower in a layered air space..
For example you are hired to inspect a tower that's 900 AGL, you are in class E air space that is depicted with that magenta gradient looking line. You will get answers with different AGL's. The trick here many will have in their head oh I can fly AGL of the tower (900)+ 400 feet and 1300 AGL will be option A. Option B will show up to but not including 700 AGL. Option C some other answer.... In this case if you choose A you will be wrong because that magenta gradient ( if the tower is on the inside) is telling you the class E begins at 700 AGL. So that's your limit, so B would be your answer.
Your part of the problem
Russ, I understand, and agree with the premise of the message you are trying to convey. However, I don’t think part 107 should even exist in the first place. We are not flying complicated high speed machines in heavy traffic to need a license like driving a vehicle. Yes, there is risk, but no more than anything else out there. Public perception seems to be the main driving force for advocating for a part 107 as to make it seem like we are better responsible pilots than those that don’t have their 107. In my experience this is not always the case. The part 107 is essentially a license to conduct business with a drone for compliance and to keep it somewhat controlled. I get that aspect of it. I try not to kid myself (not implying you are) in actually thinking it’s because the “hobby” is saturated with rouge untrained and unsafe drone pilots that “ruin it for the rest of us”. These rules and laws were going to be created regardless of actual incidents or accidents because there hasn’t really been any to warrant such strict regulations. Unfortunately, safety (and maybe good intentions) is the go to to enact new laws and regulations, but in reality safety ends up being the byproduct of whatever the real reason is.
I have love and respect for you and your channel. These are just my opinions.
Just the fact that you study and pass the part 107 exam makes you a better and safer pilot. You are much more aware of the dangers and things that can get you or others into a dangerous situation and how to avoid them.
@@haphartmann3394 you would think so, but driver’s licenses have proved that theory wrong. How many have driver’s licenses and still don’t know how to drive.
For the MOST part, I agree. I don’t believe the FAA should be ANOTHER “revenue-PRODUCING” arm of the .gov when it comes to ALL drone pilots..like when it’s a FAMILY member OR friend asking for a “project” to be completed and requires footage or video utilizing a drone. In other words, NOT A COMMERCIAL venture as we commonly know it. ‘Hiring it or leasing’ it out is a different story. Contracts can/may be drawn up, etc. It’s about MONEY AND INTRUSION..PERIOD.
@@haphartmann3394 well, THAT’S the idea anyway. NOT ALL are any smarter AND not all utilize that info..
Sorry, but I completely disagree. There have been many near misses with manned aircraft as well as actual collisions. I'd suggest a lot of these are because of ignorance (or arrogance) on the part of the P.I.C.
I live out in the country and fly in empty ballparks and fair grounds. The few times i did talk to cops they knew what it was from missing or lost persons searches. The county sheriff said they found the one person in 15 mins with an IR camera drone. So they are getting familiar. I stay away from everyone and everything without a part107. But if i want to do a side gig i need the 107.
We have an expression in the military, "How do you know what rules you can bend/break if you don't know what the rules are?" So the reality is, do you get caught everytime for speeding? No, of course not. But that ONE time is all it takes, and you'll wish you had it. Ask the dude who had a flyaway with his DJI in Vegas and it landed at the airport. Bet he wishes he can get back that fine the FAA threw at him.
Question hoping you can help with Russ. Part 107 here and I’ve been filming an office complex demolition. It’s 1.2 miles from a Class D airport. I’ve had no issues whatsoever in getting an automated LAANC approval for up to 50’ at the site and have had no issues in getting the DJI geozone unlocking approval with the LAANC approval I supply DJI. Most of the office complex is 2 stories high, so the 50’ altitude approval is fine. There is however a 10 story high office tower that I would like to capture the demolition of. I think I can legally fly up to 50’ above the roof of the building (I would actually like to fly only as high as the building itself) if I stay within 200’ of the building. If that is the case, how do I get the DJI unlocking license to grant me that additional altitude around that building? Right now it truly limits my drone flights from going higher than 50’. Thanks for any insight you may have.
I shoot real estate and very early on, I trained with a couple of photographers who said they didn't have the 107, at the time anyway. One rarely did drone work and the other, quite often. And both got their drone photos and/or video at the very end of the shoot. Get in & get out mindset. Super quick, always less than 5 minutes. And they never had any issues whatsoever. Highly knowledgeable, respectful, competent, never flying any higher than necessary, and never did anything that would draw attention to themselves. I don't do drone work, but I can understand why people with very little to no free time don't get their 107. From most accounts, this test has very little to do with piloting and safety. It's about revenue and control.
I'm all about learning the rules.....keep these videos coming... thank you
I just joined your new group. I have been watching your TH-cam channel for about a year have appreciated your practical approach. I am in favor of the regulations as they provide context in the development of common sense flying skills. I am a retired builder who specialized in home renovations, and I have made a great deal of money repairing faulty construction. Regulations create a level playing field and promote the skill that drone flying requires. I look forward to more of your videos.
I am a Realtor and have my Part 107. I use my videos on my various websites to drive traffic to them as well as for my listings. I decided to get my Part 107 when I became aware that my videos would be considered commercial by the FAA. It was watching a Milesdeep video that enlightened me.
I also completed a course to obtain my 107, however when I went to take my test the price went from 65 to 175. Trying to make a little cash on the side, check the cost of insurance. I now know the rules, if the government would make the fee reasonable more would obtain their 107
Thank you for starting a members page. I think the more info that we can receive will make us all better and safer drone operators. I just got my part 107 look forward to starting a business. Look forward to seeing what you have for us members.
Welcome aboard!
Thanks for all the content. Passed my 107 today ! 95%.. thanks for the encouragement. May or may not do the revenue thing yet.. Thanks again.
I fly a Mavic 2 Pro for fun and commercial Real estate, I do have a Mavic mini two as well and I have both registered with the FAA and I am a part 107 holder. I do appreciate the information and it is very important. Keep up the great work!
Russ been waiting for you to offer a membership. I appreciate the time you spend making each video and have been trying to figure out a way to help support all the help you have given. Glad to be a member of your channel.
Thanks Levi! I hope I can continue to provide you with useful info!
I’ve been flying drones for years and think it’s great that you give out all this information!
THIS is my weekly struggle, but I haven't had anyone tell me "Nah, I'm good" as most are just blown away at what the rules say. Last week, I flew in Sedona and my wife's friend came along and I took about 30 mins to educate him. In the end, he said he needs to get his cert because he has obviously been putting himself at risk.
Thanks for always guiding in the right direction…this is a topic where I only get the complete outlook on your challenge…
My closest neighbor is like 3 miles away. Closest "metro" area like 56 miles, so needless to say, even though I'll try to follow the rules, it doesn't impact anyone if I break them flying in my back forty. Honestly, I'd be a little hesitant if I lived where people, planes and trains were.
Great vid and i love that your making the time to help us! Keep up the great work!
Part 107, and Air Traffic Controller here. To simply put it, I tell all my trainees, “you better know what rule you are breaking.”
It's like playing jazz music... you have to know all the rules of music really well so you know when it's appropriate to break them. Otherwise, it's not music, just noise. Any nobody wants noise.
The people who makes these drone laws dont know sht about drones. I fly 3 to 4 miles out but i keep my drone under 400 ft so not to hit any manned aircraft. I fly over people but like 300ft over them. Not fly 5 feet over peoples head. I fly how i want as long as i fly safe.
After watching this video and seeing some of the comments about the 107 I have decided to sign up for the course.
I was flying my drone getting some practice shots of a lighthouse in my home town when I was approached by the keeper of the lighthouse said I was not allowed per the coast guard I was pretty sure that the coast guard does not control this but also the area is not restricted at all, I truly think if I was a licensed pilot it would have made a difference I did not argue with the gentleman I spoke with him a bit and packed up.. but great video I truly enjoy the way you communicate
Thanks!
Hello Russ, Brilliant video and instructional highlights for knowing and learning the UAV rules and regulations. As you mentioned, I fly by the rules, and we all make mistakes. I've had my membership for a couple of years, and finally, this year, I'm going to buckle down to study and take my Part 107 exams. Thank you for this tiny nude to get me back on track to complete what I started to do. Thank you for starting up the membership section, and wish you all the best. I've just upgraded my membership and joined.
Tiny nude? LOL!!! Thanks Steve!
I like the background and this video was very helpful. Thanks for teaching us the right way.
I never took any of your content as being "preachy" or whatever, just informative. Keep it up! Your videos are always good. Diggin the newer background layout, by the way.
thanks so much. agree with many folks brand new to drones. it's bitter cold bout since Christmas so I've not had much flight time. the analogy to drives Ed. is great. I do want to learn more, and be safe. so while maybe once it's warmer and I get a few more flights under my blt I'll look more into my 107 and subscription to the channel
I'm a new drone operator, and learning. I am working on getting my 107.
I do have a rules question. A rule I think I'm breaking. Flying over vehicles. We shoot offroad action shots. A couple of my shots sometimes involve flying over vehicles or driving under a hovering drone.
These are my own vehicles... or vehicles that belong to people I'm travelling with.
Am I violating the rule or am I in a grey area because these are people I'm travelling with who are involved in the production?
Russ, Thank you for what you do. Your video are invaluable to the furtherance of the drone industry and are greatly appreciate. Keep up the great work. Largo, FL
Just finished my Part 107 training and am now working to schedule the test, although I have no plans to fly my drone commercially. Once I'm 80 feet in the air, my DJI Mini 3 Pro is often out of my visual line of sight, as it's so tiny and relatively quiet. Regardless, I do my best to follow the rules. I use LAANC, I use an app to check local aircraft traffic, and I listen to my scanner for air traffic.
I feel that there's value to getting a Part 107 certification, even for those of us who have no plans to fly drones commercially. An education is never wasted.
There is never a reason not to be well educated. I'm not a drone owner but will be eventually and these videos will help me be prepared for what I need to know. Thank you and keep them coming. Better to be educated than ignorant.
Thank you Russ great video
Russ, quick idea: Why not re-name your channel with your name? Something like Stuart & Alina (Carroll) did. You have a cool, alliterative name; why not use it! Cheers, good brother. 💛🙏🏼
I’m getting my 107 this year. I have a business startup idea and people I can market my service to if licensed. It’s a good idea if not just for the information you can learn around airspace rules and flight restrictions. But being able to make money on it and not having to worry about the Powers that be swooping in and causing problems? Worth it.
The FAA rules are pretty straight forward. It’s the various state and local laws that are annoying. My state requires you to get an additional permit after you have your 107 in order to be “legal”.
Welcome to North Carolina
I'm working on my part 107 because I was finally able to sell my architectural client on hyperlapse for advertising and etc
As someone who is about 50% through a Part 107 course via Pilot Institute I must say, there is so much good information not only to help you be a better drone pilot but to be more aware of conditions. Plus it helps separate you from the average drone pilot because you can backup what you say. 💪🏽
Here’s to 2022 making some side cash with our drones!💸
Loving the updated look with the setup Russ.😎
Soon you will need to go to school for law before you fly a drone. Just pay for it should be cheap.
A quick note to take the rest it went from 65 to 175
Well put Russ. Keep up the good work.
Just recently found your channel. Bought a Mavic Mini 2 and learning all sorts of new stuff. It's good to know the rules so that you at least know when you're breaking them.
So I appreciate your education videos on flying, LAANC, editing, checklists, and more.
Your video encouraged me to do this. As a hobbyist, I will find ways to self learn but it will happen. I support your message. Thank you.
Should I upgrade, I own the first magic pro. Should I buy the mini pro 3?
Totally agree with you Russ - I am in the UK where the certification is different, i.e. A2 Cofoc & GVC, + EU Complaint Insuranc,,,, and have taken the courses/licenses and dangle those badges from my lanyard when flying - It helps a lot with public perception, and helps me to be a safer more responsible drone pilot. Prior to these CAA - Certs (FAA equiv) I was flying oblivious to many inherant dangers, even crashed twice because of. Not saying I'm perfect now, just that it's better, and the public tend to leave you alone instead of moaning. A big thumbs up for this vid Russ,,,,, great topic. 👍
Hi Russ, First off, I just want to say many thanks for all your knowledge and expertise and sharing it with all of us! So, I'm a brand new drone owner and was hoping you could help me with a question concerning my; lets call it "do the right thing", "civic duty" maybe...I'm teetering between registering my Mini 3 Pro with the FAA or not. I didn't buy this drone with a weight limit as a factor in my purchase and the 5 dollar once every 3 years isn't an issue. After watching several videos on conflicts between drone pilots and law enforcement, would it be any advantage for me to be able to at least say to an officer "Yes sir, I am registered with the FAA and I'm trying my best to uphold all the FAA and COB rules as a recreational pilot". One other thing, if I did register w/the FAA, would that also force me to have to register w/ the state and local authorities...which happens to be a 25 dollar annual fee even as a recreational pilot. I guess what I'm saying, is I don't want to be viewed as some dirtbag just trying to skirt around the laws and get away with not being a responsible drone flyer...any input would be appreciated. Thanks again!
Are law enforcement required to follow part 107. If not where is it listed.
I have a 107 because we have an RV travel channel, but following the rules within 107 are still challenging, I use air control before i fly but many of the places we go are in no fly zones. Getting the 107 was easy, no reason for somebody making money from droning not to get their 107, just lazy and cheap. The only reason i check in with this channel is rules to follow. I fly a 3 year old drone, i dont have upgrade fever. Interested to see how your memberships go. Larry
Great video, thanks Russ.
I'm really new to drones. I haven't started the process of getting my part 107 yet but it is definitely in works. First though, I just want to be able to fly well enough that it at least looks like I know what I'm doing. I want to be as legal and knowledgeable as I can as well. I've also been watching a lot of drone related content here on TH-cam. The question that always pops up to me is how these people are flying within the rules. There's no way many of them are flying line of sight. I also see people flying FPV without a second person as well. I see other things also. I can understand how many people don't care about the rules when they see their favorite content creators openly flaunting them. Others, as you say, just don't care. However, all it takes is one person to complain or for something to happen and they could get a visit from the FAA.
3:07 You can fly a paramotor 10,000 feet in the air with no license, but you need a license for a drone? I miss the days before people ruined things and now they have all these laws. I have remote control cars... why would I need a license for that? Why can't people just fly remote control planes and helicopters in peace?
Nice calm background lights! 👍
I live in Canada and fly my drones two to three times a week, I'm retired. I suspect that our rules are about the same as the rules in the USA.When I purchased my first drone I got my basic licence to pilot a drone and I registered my drone. When I did my test to get my drone pilot licence I was surprised to some degree that the test had more questions about fixed wing aircraft than about drones. The licence expires in two in two years and then you have to take another test to renew your licence. It takes much more experience and knowledge to get a driver's licence and that is good for five years. The two year rules is BS. I don't always follow the rules especially the line of sight and nobody else does either. In all this time I have flying my drone never met a drone pilot that has his or hers drone pilot license as the vastlicense expired I didn't renew it because the test doesn't relate to flying a drone. If you know the rules and are a responsible pilot you do not need a licence.
Totally agree. I had my licence in Canada a few years back then everything changed. I use my drone for my business to take overhead shots of progress. I don’t sell them they are only for me. I like you registered again when rules changed but only for hobbiest. I fly in the country for fun but when in town or city I’m up and down in minutes and packed up. I never go to fairs, outdoor gatherings as that is dangerous and just stupid. So at this point I’m not going to get a licence in Canada of US.
I am a Multi Licensed private pilot with 48 years of flying. Yes the sectional charts are a bit of a confusion. Even have to carry an new one in my seaplane. Did the old school with a plotter and speed wheel. Also an avid R/C pilot and drone owner. I obey all of the rules for each.
A quote we use is " The FAA is not happy, until You Aren't ". Fly Safe.
To each their own, but I agree with you it’s better to be well informed on what you are doing in the sky. Thanks for the great content!
New to the channel and interested in purchasing a drone. I plan to take the 107 test before buying one. Something I have not heard mentioned in my very short experience with drone TH-cam videos. No one discusses liability. What are the insurance requirements and needs. Requirements meaning what should a responsible person do? Do insurance companies offer discounts if you have a 107 license. Is the impact greater if using it for commercial gain?
Love your channel Russ! Thank you for all of the valuable information. I do have my Trust certificate.
Hey Russ you touched on a lot of good points.. Also personal crap that I have experience with.. if you ever want interview me about what happened and what's the outcome I would be on board with that.. no biggy though.. just throwing it out there . Thx Russ.
I think that would make for an awesome live stream Q & A.
If I have a mini 2, which is under the 250g limit for registering the drone or whatever, I dont need the part 107, right? (Have no plans to do a side hustle with it, just an occasional flying time on weekends or whenever I have time)
Correct
The FAA should make Part 107 about drones, things related to it and affordable. If we have to pay $150 + to fly recreational it will turn into a rich-people hobby.
You don't need 107 purely for recreational flying, you do need the TRUST certificate, which is free and easy. Recreational flying comes with a lot of restrictions, like flying under a CBOs safety guidelines, you can't even gift aerial photos or video to someone who will use it commercially. Part 107 gives you a lot more freedom, but for purely recreational flying TRUST is all that is required. (Both TRUST and Part 107 also apply to old-school RC airplanes and helicopters, it's not just multirotor)
@@ericapelz260 I'm referring to a hypothetical case of a mandatory Part 107 for All drone pilots regardless of commercial or recreational use of a drone.
Excellent points. Where I live we do not need a certification unless purely commercial or over a park / government land. That said, to be legal, I took my A2 for both UK and EU when I travel there. Best to avoid drama on vacation I say. The nice thing was I was able to take the A2 for both online but FAA 107 I cannot. Maybe someday!
I agree with you 100% and I have to follow the rules since I live near a local airport and the planes fly around the same height as my drone so I know I need to be careful.
Great video as usual Russ
I don't have my drone yet. Comes tomorrow, I will be willing to do the part 107 test. Why not?
I’m in the New York City , is it necessary to register 250g drone ?
If I use footage for my TH-cam Channel, would I still need Part 107 remote pilot certificate?
I just bought a drone DJI Mini 2 SE. Can I fly it on my property without a LAANC Approval? Recreational?
Awesome video!
🛫📖🛬
Russ,
The membership format makes more sense.
All of your patreon members could just transition to the membership acct.
I for one would like to support you by becoming a member.
Your channel is really one of the best, because of your down-to-earth approach. You are a good communicator and your laid back body language puts everybody at ease.
GOD bless
🛐✈️🐆🐆🐆
I appreciate that!
Its always a refresher and keep up to date with the rules and changes to those rules on a category of a need a refresher of rules a couple of weeks ago a drone pilot decided to fly their drone during the Bengals vs raiders NFL playoff and didn't either know that there's a no fly zone this is an example why on that front why rules need to be followed on that front but need to be educated on the rules or a refresher course about why you shouldn't be flying drones during outdoor professional sporting events
Yes you should always attempt to follow the rules.
Yes, unintentionally I have lost visual line of sight do to sun glare or whatever the case may be, but I didn't intentionally lose VLS and if it happens I do a immediate return to home until I visually spot my drone.
Yes, I have unintentionally flow over 400 Feet because of a updraft lift in the wind currents but the second I realize I descend in my altitude.
Do I think the FAA is out to bust people like me? No, I don't because we take immediate action to correct the situation.
Do I think the FAA will bust people who intentionally disregard the rules and behave in a reckless manner? Absolutely!
Yes, we do need rules and regulations and I don't have any issues playing by them.
Part of the problem is the rules are so arbitrary. Why a limit of 400 ft, regardless of airspace when an unlicensed paramotor or experimental aircraft pilot can fly to 14,000 feet in unrestricted airspace? Why is visual line of sight or a spotter required when I can see far better with HD goggles than any spotter or someone flying without goggles at the extreme of their visual sight using a camera drone and flying los? Why are they implementing a plan to track exactly where I am standing when I fly when an experimental aircraft is not even required to carry adb-s and a terrorist would definitely never use a tracker if using a drone to attack? Many of the rules just seem like something pulled out of a hat or somewhere else.
I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND&AGREE w your intent &why ur making the point! With this awesome position you've established for yourself & as your audience expands, monetization etc, it's only common sense that it would be your moral responsibility to include this helpful content! It's like grammar- or manners/etiquette-- it's ok to speak however you want, using improper semantics or choosing to put your elbows on the dining table or not placing napkin on your lap, but if you're in an interview or a formal speaking/eating situation, you damn well better know how to speak & write properly and compose yourself or show appropriate courtesy in presence of ppl /places that matter.
So, If you're going to invest or be active in the fabulous world of drones, you best be educated&informed on safety &laws! What you DO with that is another thing. Btw, i love your content & tell "Blavid', he could be a better supporter to his friend!!! ❤❤😊
What was the other drone school? You said there were only two good ones, but then only mentioned one of them.
I really and truly appreciate your informative videos. I’ve been wanting to get my Part 107 but I’ve been procrastinating. I’m gonna work on getting it with the information that you provide so that i can make some extra income. Thanks a million. 👍
As a police officer for 42 years I fully enjoyed your driving analogy. The only thing I have to say is that it is important to remember that if you choose to bend or break the rules, you must be prepared to accept the consequences if something goes wrong. Trust me, the last thing a cop or court will listen to is “everybody else does it’!
Let me ask you this. If you see a person flying there drone. Would you go over and start asking "Cop questions" to find out if that drone pilot is following the rules or not. I've seen it too many times that the police get involve for no reason or any suspicious activity. Rules still apply to you as well. If you have no reason or suspicions Then I don't have to talk to you nor do I have to show you anything. So move along Cop
@@draggerlane04090 Dude. No reason to be antagonistic. You don't even know this person, yet your approach is as if they wronged you in some way? Not cool.
@@draggerlane04090 Being a smaller female who worked the streets for that entire time in the PD, running the port security team, fatal crash reconstruction team, and the dive team for 30 of those years, I do not appreciate heavy handed policing any more than you apparently do. According to law and the Supreme Court, I can walk up to anyone and engage them in conversation. If they don’t want to reciprocate, it is entirely their choice. But as a fellow drone operator, I am always interested in their equipment, intent, and skill level, because I most probably will get a civilian complaint and would like to put that civilian at ease right away, thereby avoiding confrontations between resident and drone flyer. 99.9% of us cops are NOT jack-booted thugs, but in fact are interested in keeping our patrol areas safe. Bear in mind that if the drone operator pops off right away with an attitude of “move along, cop”, then it may bear further investigation. I have always had the attitude that I will treat you with the utmost respect until you turn it around. It has always worked for me!
@@51Drones You're right I did come off strong Jill Simmons I apologize for my first comment. However my question is valid. Where I live the Police harass the drone community all the time including me. I have tried to be polite and professional only to be threaten with Jail if I'm caught off my my property. I can't count how many times I have been threaten with that. It has gotten to filing complaints after complaints to nothing being done and other drone pilots threaten the same. It's to the point I gave up fly my drone it's to much a hassle now.
@@51Drones Hey Russ! Thank you for that! My reply to him is the last I will make. He obviously has had a bad experience with the .1% and he apparently sees his way clear to painting all officers with the same broad brush. It’s a shame. I hope he doesn’t do that if he is slighted by some other member of some group and blame them all for the bad behavior of one of them. Anyway, thanks for sticking up for me! I appreciate it.
One of the ones I see where people are probable are not following the laws is when they are flying over the length of rail road tracks and even while thier is a train.
I agree with the message and the benefits of the part 107. I’ve also received a great deal of information from this channel, so I’m not knocking per-se. But I can’t help feeling frustrated that the last three drone videos I watched to learn about any news on the FAA and drones have ultimately just been ads themselves for TH-cam subscription channels or part 107 courses. Here I essentially had to watch one short Google ad, had to skip through another just to watch a 10 minute 51 Drones ad for a paid-for walled subscription channel. :-/
I like the green back lit area behind you head. Very effective.
I tried looking up this new paid subscription page you mentioned and I could not find any information. Could you please add the link to this thread. Many thanks.
I think it's awesome Russ, what you plan on doing? Being familiar with the FAA rules is always a bonus. Well, I think it is.
I don't fly to make money, I've always flown drones for the love of the sport. I don't plan on making money with my drone either. I understand that it's always a good thing to have, but when someone is sure like me that's not going to use a part 107. What's the use? Believe me, I've thought about it, but just to have it? Nah
I'm sure pilot institute is awesome? I always watch their videos. I'm subscribed to both you and them.
Thanks again for sharing Russ. I think you're doing a fantastic job. 👍 👍 👍
Is the test online now? I think the nearest testing site was like 2 hours away from me last time I checked. Thanks
I got my Part 107, because of you, Russ! (And I'm glad I did...thanks for the inspiration!)
And FTR...I have a Mavic Air 2 and Mavic Air 2S (Also, a Mini 2, and Mavic Pro) The 2 I use most; Mini 2 and Air 2S,
If everyone is driving at least 5 MPH over the speed limit, then the speed limit is set too low. If the 'rules' for flying a drone are set in such a way that essentially everyone is breaking some of them at some point, then those are bad rules that need to be rescinded. The way I see it, this is just yet another way for govt. goons to go after people they don't like, and I am sick of it.
great video Russ!
Thank your for this video. You mentioned the Drone School you used to pass your Part 107, but said there were only two good schools. Do you mind naming the other good Drone School?
Pilot Institute.
I have my Part 107 License. I do real estate photography using various drones. Since I use them in business I have to be aware of the FAA Rules and controls on flying in different areas and altitudes because if something happens while I'm flying that causes injury or interference with other aircraft the company I work for could be sued. If you're flying within the limits of the regulations and laws your liability is reduced or even protected. I carry my license and a copy of the State Laws that apply to me. I can then provide it to any law enforcement or citizen that questions my right to fly.
Driver’s license in my state is $40, for eight years. 107 costs $175, with no guarantee that you will pass. I’ve been flying for years, and follow all the rules. I have also completed the TRUST certification. I see no reason to give the government money for a 107.
You don’t have to take the part 107 test if your only flying for fun.
@@haphartmann3394 I shouldn’t have to take, pay for, and pass a test just because I might occasionally want to “further a business” with my labor.