I've watched many of your videos over the last few weeks and I'm truly enjoying them. I am now subscribed to your channel. Thank you for your hard work!
You know, I just figured out yesterday that had answered a question of mine on Quora a year ago 😂 I didn't know until now The prime newtons himself It was until I checked ur profile that I knew you made a great transition. I'm glad I know your channel Please make videos on differential equations
@@PrimeNewtons I will have to look into this some more. There is something at the back of my mind telling me that this is not an issue here. The definition for both Taylor and Maclaurin would be wrong if it were the case. Taylor for when x = c.
Hey @PrimeNewtons! In your differentiating using first principles playlist, I think you forgot to make a video for (a^x)', please make a video if you read this
I've watched many of your videos over the last few weeks and I'm truly enjoying them. I am now subscribed to your channel. Thank you for your hard work!
You are a wonderful teacher, I envy those students who directly learns in class room from you. ❤
You are my favourite math youtuber! I'm saying hello from Russia!
Honestly I’m so happy I found this channel, the first video I saw was tetrations.
Is the that problem you left us with 46656?
No
Thanks for your perfect explanation Keep up the good work❤
Very, very relatable presentation. I wish you much success!
You know, I just figured out yesterday that had answered a question of mine on Quora a year ago 😂
I didn't know until now
The prime newtons himself
It was until I checked ur profile that I knew you made a great transition.
I'm glad I know your channel
Please make videos on differential equations
Epic video as always, you've got serious talent as a lecturer
I think it is nicer to go from n = 0 , then we don't need the 1 at the beginning for the expansion. Love your videos.
The problem is x⁰ will be a problem since x=0. It becomes 0⁰
@@PrimeNewtons I will have to look into this some more. There is something at the back of my mind telling me that this is not an issue here. The definition for both Taylor and Maclaurin would be wrong if it were the case. Taylor for when x = c.
@@PrimeNewtons doesn't 0^0 just equal 1?
Hey @PrimeNewtons! In your differentiating using first principles playlist, I think you forgot to make a video for (a^x)', please make a video if you read this
That's hard
Just curious, but why the reupload? What was wrong with the other video?
The summation needed to be
1 + Σ
Prime newton's I love you
I love you too
That's Taylor series ( i was told)
Its name is taylor-mclaurin
But formulaes are not incorrect right 🤔🫡👍