Can I. Tell. You. Something. Yung. I. Was. Married. To. A. Man. Who. I. Guess. Some. Would say. Was. In. My. Age. Circle. I. Think. There. Was. About. A. 10 year. Age. I. Tried. To. Make. The. Marriage. Work. But. He. Was. A. Wife. Beater. So. After. 13. Years. It. Ended. In. Divorce. Years. LATER. I. Started . Dating. A. Older. Man. From. My. Past. We. Became. Engaged. And. Appropriately. 1. Year. Later. We. Married. And. Had. A. Great. Marriage. But. In. Almost. 4. Years. Cancer. Claimed his. Life. I. Love. And. Miss Emmett. Senior and. Getting. Was. Older. Than. Me. But. He. Did. Not. Ever. Lay. A. Hand. On. Me. To. Harm. Me. Rip. Emmet. Linville. Senipr
Yea she’s a beautiful ebony woman and carries herself with class. Meanwhile the defendant is a grown ass man dating and impregnated a teenager. The judge totally ignores this and is obsessed with her being “boogie”.
The plaintiff was attractive but very stuck up acting, and like Judge Mathis said she is of age of consent in Illinois which is where they're from which is 17.
She is powerfully toxic. Destroying property, constantly bringing up flaws in others while ignoring her own and neglecting her legal responsibilities....... "also" she's the only one that got arrested NOTHING classy about that 🤷🏿
Mathis knew the plaintiff was right but was already in his feelings so he went against her. Told ya'll about him from jump. Now many of you are here complaining about him but when I said it there was a problem. I was right all along.
He's never had any respect for women... unless they come out the gate telling him they go to church five times a week and run some kind of Christian charity.
Man idc if she’s bougie, speak down to them, etc. How is everyone on the weirdo side?! Everyone meaning the crowd that’s clapping and laughing at the jokes. Even JM skipping past it. Man you know he didn’t just start talking to her on her 16th bday. That shit sick.
Judge Mathis ignorant as hell. 17 may be of age in some states but if she’s telling a story of when the young lady was 16 SHE WAS INDEED UNDERAGE?!?! Tf he’s disgusting
The defendants won the plaintiff lost Let It Go. And by the way that is not a 17 year old Mathis repeatedly said she's of age *now* so either she's 18 or the state where they're at 17 might as well be 18 because it's of age.
How??? Cause the plaintiff talked more about the defendant than she talked about her, so sounds to me like the plaintiff has hate towards the defendant to me..
@@beverlyhall4578 it's not illegal to date a 16 year old. she said their first time having sex was 17 on her birthday. that's age of consent dear. use your head.
@@tanzi4212 sweetie, the lady said their first time was on her 17th birthday. that is legal dear. most states considers 17 to be a legal adult and you can move out then. not to mention the age of consent is legal as well. use your head dear. and not your emotion.
@@BoomBap75 because she's 17 and in Illinois where they're from that's the age of consent like Judge Mathis repeatedly said but everybody act like they got a sugar daddy in their ear and didn't hear that part. Mathis knows about Illinois laws he wouldn't gloss over that if she was under 17.
@ramsesstafford4640 She was 16 when they started dating...That's the part that was GLOSSED OVER...U probably think RKelly is innocent too...I'm sure you'd feel different if that was your daughter...🤔
All of you are acting slow af. Clearly it’s him ignoring or downplaying major things like domestic abuse and underaged sexual relationships. But he’s always in an uproar about trivial subjects. SMH
ALOT OF TIMES MATHIS DONT LISTEN & IT UPSETS ME. SHE IS SAYING HE WAS WITH HER BEFORE SHE TURNED 17 AND SHE JUST TURNED 17 FOR HER BIRTHDAY. WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS HE WAS BREAKING THE LAW MESSING WITH HER BEFORE. GOSH 🤦🏽♀️ LISTEN JUDGE, LISTEN
Now comeon man they started dating just before her 17th birthday. I mean ya you can it's wrong but comeon now it's like 1 month before turning 17.that means she was already there.
@@YashKumar-tj3vt where in the video was it stated that they hooked up a month before her birthday? Give me the time so I can go back & listen. On another note, I'd like u to go have sex with someone 1 week younger than the legal age. let's see if you're charged. Another sick dude
The odds of you winning the case after you get on Judge Mathis’ bad side is slim 😂 He made up in his mind that she was bougie so whatever she said after that fell on deaf ears.
Something weird going on in that house. Defendant is definitely a predator & a groomer. Shame on JM for ignoring the actions of the defendant and making light of the plaintiff's case. They definitely went through her stuff and stole her money.
Weird how judge mathis stuck on her being bougie but just brush over the the fact he was dating a minor and accused of domestic violence. Side note if she had a baby it's obvious he broke the law.
I’m confused as to why the audience started clapping when the defendant nastily insulted the plaintiff. JM did some nasty work on this case, and letting them talk over each other was a whole mess 🫠
Huh? Excuse me, she was 16, just turning 17, and had already had a baby by him. I must be missing something cause I could've sworn that was called RAPE. Wth.
This was the most Jerry Springer-like episode ever. I have questions about this "couple." How long were they "dating?" When did they start "dating?" Who else knew that they were "dating?" Where did they meet each other? Why couldn't she live with her parents? What did the parents think about this situation?
What exactly made the plaintiff bourgeoisie? She never mentioned the finer things in life or brands. JM had no comment on underage baby making and his criminal record.
Aside from him being disgusting he lied. First he said he told her that he had a girl living there before she even moved in . Then he said she said to him 2 weeks after she moved in that she thought he was single. Why would she think that if she already knew? Everyone is so caught up in her being “boujie” they’re not even listening
Defendants definitely look like they got escorted to class..and JM know he wouldnt have it with his daughters..idc what the state law is some stuff you just dont do..and he was abusive to both women, he shoulda been called out like the others..They stole that money
Wonder what Judge meant by his daughter has "regular" friends. He the one looks down on folks. Strip him of his money and what's left. No substance at all. His family half way deal with him now imagine if he wasn't kissing butt with a dollar 🙄
Once judge starts ego trippin, it’s over with. He makes me sick when it comes to stuff like this, he harps on stuff that bruises his fragile ego, but doesn’t harp on the more serious issue. Legal doesn’t always mean moral! 21 with a 16 year old is sick asf idc.
This was BLATANTLY WEIRD how Judge Mathis completely glossed over and passed the alleged minor allegations even defending it at a certain point in the case…🤔 Definitely not saying Judge Mathis is into this, but because he is an extremely opinionated Judge, I’m side eyeing the lack of addressing.
Is JM slow… she was SIXTEEN up until the day of that incident (maybe younger depending on how long they had been together)… so her turning 17 that day doesn’t magically make it ok. At no point did she talk “down” on him about the law… He claims to love people having knowledge, but is so intimidated when they show it. 🙄 His ego is stressful.
Disappointed in the judge for brushing off the fact that he's 21 and that little girl was 16. And then saying they're "of age" highly doubt he would be so nonchalant if it was his daughter.
![กิโลเมตรที่ 0 เดินทางรอบโลกไม่ใช้เครื่องบิน [Around The World Ep. 1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/toJG9oofLFY/mqdefault.jpg)
Damn she got bashed more for being conceited more than that child molestor
Exactly!
@@TROLLzenbergRAW because she's not a child anymore and they're still together now she's of age like Judge Mathis repeatedly said Let It Go.
@@ramsesstafford464017 is 100% a child.
@@ramsesstafford4640 She is still a child
@@Brie-yc7ox It goes by the age of consent, which is 16 in some states
Neither 16 nor 17 is an adult. Smh
I’m telling you he be so selective about the things he wants to dismiss!
Depending on the state. Morally it is wrong
Age of consent in Illinois is 17, she said it happened on her birthday....
@@antisocialbutterfly16that had nothing to do with the case tho.... its messed up if she was under 17 because the age of consent is 17 in Illinois
Age of consent in Illinois is 17, she said it happened on her birthday....
He should be in jail for messing around with a minor
21 with a 16 year old?? That’s disgusting
Can I. Tell. You. Something. Yung. I. Was. Married. To. A. Man. Who. I. Guess. Some. Would say. Was. In. My. Age. Circle. I. Think. There. Was. About. A. 10 year. Age. I. Tried. To. Make. The. Marriage. Work. But. He. Was. A. Wife. Beater. So. After. 13. Years. It. Ended. In. Divorce. Years. LATER. I. Started . Dating. A. Older. Man. From. My. Past. We. Became. Engaged. And. Appropriately. 1. Year. Later. We. Married. And. Had. A. Great. Marriage. But. In. Almost. 4. Years. Cancer. Claimed his. Life. I. Love. And. Miss Emmett. Senior and. Getting. Was. Older. Than. Me. But. He. Did. Not. Ever. Lay. A. Hand. On. Me. To. Harm. Me. Rip. Emmet. Linville. Senipr
My. Older. Husband. Emmett. Linville. Senior. Did not lay. A. Hand. On. Me to. Harm. Me
Big facts that would def be a problem if that was my daughter
@@sharonlinville261what is wrong with you? Why do you write like that?
@@Katomusicgroupyes it's 🤢😷
Who let their 16 year old daughter live with their 21 year old boyfriend?
Parents that are trying to be their child's friend.
A lot of women, believe it or not..
@@cynthiawallace7108 I see smh. To each his own I guess
Alot of women
Her parents
He got this all wrong SMH. HE had a baby with a 16 Y/O !!!
That's not what the case is about, this is not moral court, this about rent property damaged.
He should be ashamed of himself impregnating that 16 year old girl
@@latonyasmith4395don’t matter
@@yomamaandyodaddyhit4413 obviously it does 🤷🏿
@@latonyasmith4395they go through every plaintiff and defendant past on all the other episodes and all of a sudden they don’t matter now? He’s a pedo!
17 is a damn child, that’s crazy judge Mathis didn’t tear into him about being a pedophile , let alone let him win the ridiculous case
It’s not statutory rape. The person must be 5 or 10 years older than the 16 or 17 old minor. That y JM didn’t tear into him
@@Kingdonjuan117 you sound like one of them, & if that was your kid?
17 is age of consent dear. use your brain.
@@karma48567says the pedo always
Be glad they’re not in the state of Texas. Cause in the state of Texas, 17 years old is considered GROWN.
Nothing wrong with this lady... nothing boujee about her. Instead she is gorgeous and classy ❤
Yea she’s a beautiful ebony woman and carries herself with class. Meanwhile the defendant is a grown ass man dating and impregnated a teenager. The judge totally ignores this and is obsessed with her being “boogie”.
The plaintiff was attractive but very stuck up acting, and like Judge Mathis said she is of age of consent in Illinois which is where they're from which is 17.
She is powerfully toxic. Destroying property, constantly bringing up flaws in others while ignoring her own and neglecting her legal responsibilities....... "also" she's the only one that got arrested
NOTHING classy about that 🤷🏿
Definitely not bougie when having to rent a room off Craig's list from a 21-year-old,
Yeah 16 is a minor and he's an adult. Judge Mathis makes me sick
I didn't respect his attitude toward that situation at all..
You a lawyer?
Mathis knew the plaintiff was right but was already in his feelings so he went against her. Told ya'll about him from jump. Now many of you are here complaining about him but when I said it there was a problem. I was right all along.
He's never had any respect for women... unless they come out the gate telling him they go to church five times a week and run some kind of Christian charity.
Unfortunately he a plant lol. He goes back and forth on a lot. Bring back judge joe brown .
Man idc if she’s bougie, speak down to them, etc. How is everyone on the weirdo side?! Everyone meaning the crowd that’s clapping and laughing at the jokes. Even JM skipping past it. Man you know he didn’t just start talking to her on her 16th bday. That shit sick.
Judge Mathis ignorant as hell. 17 may be of age in some states but if she’s telling a story of when the young lady was 16 SHE WAS INDEED UNDERAGE?!?! Tf he’s disgusting
Right this was outrageous
By law it not statutory rape due to the minor being 16 or 17 and he being 21. The person must be more then 5 or 10 years older then the minor.
@@Kingdonjuan117 google is free that is not the law
Depending on the state 17 is still a minor.
Not here in Florida
@lillianwill8ams5510. Exactly right. Like you said depending on the state.
Most states it’s legal
@@moniquebrown7738haha Florida.
Age of consent in Illinois is 17 which that's where they reside...
Whew...man, I have a headache after listening to this case, lol. They're all talking over each other.
Whew, you and me both
Including Judge Mathis.. lol
I had to rewind I felt like I missed something
The defendant's girlfriend has so much hate for the plaintiff its sad
Yea cuz she’s a child. She’s behaving as a disrespectful teenager, which is what she is. The defendant should be in jail.
Jealousy
The defendants won the plaintiff lost Let It Go. And by the way that is not a 17 year old Mathis repeatedly said she's of age *now* so either she's 18 or the state where they're at 17 might as well be 18 because it's of age.
@@ramsesstafford4640Right
How??? Cause the plaintiff talked more about the defendant than she talked about her, so sounds to me like the plaintiff has hate towards the defendant to me..
She may be bougie but had a high school diploma and not pregnant at seventeen.
Unless they started dating on her birthday then yes he was definitely dating a minor.
He was dating her at 16.
@@beverlyhall4578Reading is fundamental.
@@beverlyhall4578 it's not illegal to date a 16 year old. she said their first time having sex was 17 on her birthday. that's age of consent dear. use your head.
@@karma48567she wasn’t an adult use your head , f*ck the law
@@tanzi4212 sweetie, the lady said their first time was on her 17th birthday. that is legal dear. most states considers 17 to be a legal adult and you can move out then. not to mention the age of consent is legal as well. use your head dear. and not your emotion.
Why is he Glossin over the fact that she was only 16 when the Plaintiff Moved in..He shoulda been tellin that idiot how WRONG he was...SICKENING 🤬
@@BoomBap75 because she's 17 and in Illinois where they're from that's the age of consent like Judge Mathis repeatedly said but everybody act like they got a sugar daddy in their ear and didn't hear that part. Mathis knows about Illinois laws he wouldn't gloss over that if she was under 17.
@ramsesstafford4640 She was 16 when they started dating...That's the part that was GLOSSED OVER...U probably think RKelly is innocent too...I'm sure you'd feel different if that was your daughter...🤔
😂😂😂😂😂 I’m talking bout the child right there
she ateeee with that one 😂😂
@@shimmergangfitness5880 no she atteeee with that one! Lol
She really did be they look stupid
She def ateeeeee!😂
Lmfaooo 🤣🤣
37inch flat screen tv. Sir that’s a computer screen
😅
😜cus why are you taking me to court for $100 bucks
Exactly 😂
Like a monitor! 🖥️🤔🤨🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
Wtf is wrong with this 21 year old who wants a 16 year old? Something ain't right!!
@@annaprice7276 ikr.
Control
Now I remember why I stopped watching Judge Mathis 😮
I know that's right. I can't stand him sometimes
Mathis 💪 💯 ignore the haters
I'd love to know why you said that
@@mpumephakathi6200 you ain't gotta like Mathis but you obviously like his cases because here you are. LMFAO
All of you are acting slow af. Clearly it’s him ignoring or downplaying major things like domestic abuse and underaged sexual relationships. But he’s always in an uproar about trivial subjects. SMH
judge mathis just blew me on the underage comment 😑 straight ignorance
Nah it’s not, in many states the age of consent is 16 or 17. Don’t make it right but yeah
He's dismissed that a lot recently and it sure is mind blowing...he's gotten so used to the dysfunctional cases I don't think he cares anymore...
@@mrshappilymarried1it’s legal in most states
@@teegreen3909legal doesn’t equal moral..it was legal to own slaves as well and that wasn’t ok
@@teegreen3909 we all know the law doesn't care to protect children so the fact that it's legal means nothing to me. It's immoral and wrong.
I believe they took her money!!
Me too! Judge Mathis wasn't trying to hear what she had to say
They probably did but she didn't prove her case but they proved their case and that's why she had to pay for that TV. 🤷🏽♂️
21 years old and with a 16 year old Iam sick of this seeing this type of behavior…..PARENTS do better 🗣🗣‼️‼️
Lord, forgive me but both the defendants look a bit slow. Lol!
And u look fast lol🤣🤣🤣 Jk😋
Definitely slow. Especially the gf facial expressions
@@Toriab Yes!
😅😅😅
I thought it was me just thinking it
JM defending his behavior is DIABOICAL!! Underage is underage....
Just totally disregard the law. Carry on. Not defending the defendant. Just questioning your reasoning.
She was in no way talking down to JM! He’s annoyingAF!
He just don't like when ppl say they know the law. He wants to be the only one in the world that knows it.
The clapback about the child 😂
ALOT OF TIMES MATHIS DONT LISTEN & IT UPSETS ME. SHE IS SAYING HE WAS WITH HER BEFORE SHE TURNED 17 AND SHE JUST TURNED 17 FOR HER BIRTHDAY. WHICH OBVIOUSLY MEANS HE WAS BREAKING THE LAW MESSING WITH HER BEFORE. GOSH 🤦🏽♀️ LISTEN JUDGE, LISTEN
Now comeon man they started dating just before her 17th birthday. I mean ya you can it's wrong but comeon now it's like 1 month before turning 17.that means she was already there.
@@YashKumar-tj3vt where in the video was it stated that they hooked up a month before her birthday? Give me the time so I can go back & listen. On another note, I'd like u to go have sex with someone 1 week younger than the legal age. let's see if you're charged. Another sick dude
How is 17 of age.. I’m so confused. And the defendant gf seems a bit slow
Mathis be coming off sick in the head sometimes
Every time there's an older man or woman with a child, he just be brushing over it and I don't like that.
@@ULTRXBLXCK exactly
The defendant gf so intimidated by the plaintiff 😅 She will do anything to keep that manchild 😂
The defendants boyfriend wanted the plantiff end of discussion
Obviously
The child right there took me out🤣🤣🤣
The odds of you winning the case after you get on Judge Mathis’ bad side is slim 😂 He made up in his mind that she was bougie so whatever she said after that fell on deaf ears.
Exactly as he does in all cases.
That works the same way in conventional court cases also.
I believe her. They took her money
Her friend stole that 2. Hundred from under her mattress 😂😂😂😂
Plot twist 😂😂😂
Something weird going on in that house. Defendant is definitely a predator & a groomer. Shame on JM for ignoring the actions of the defendant and making light of the plaintiff's case. They definitely went through her stuff and stole her money.
The judge didn’t make the defendant present proof of how much that TV cost and still ruled in his favor. SMH
The announcer for the show sure made it to point out that the girlfriend is 17. Lmmfbao 😂😅😂 he a Cho Mo.
😂😂😂 I caught that too lol 😆 #messy
The announcer always off the chain
Judge Mathis has a habit of not calling out pedos on his show
Black Women, there’s nothing wrong with being boujie!
Weird how judge mathis stuck on her being bougie but just brush over the the fact he was dating a minor and accused of domestic violence.
Side note if she had a baby it's obvious he broke the law.
JM be pissing me off. No way she shouldve lost. He know damn well they took her money.
I hate he got her thinking she bougie!! She want to be bougie so bad 😂😂
Righhhhht!! After he mentioned bougiee Her voice tone changed too lol I didn’t see bougiee at all… maybe a “wannabe bougiee””
@@jazzyjennshighway Yes !! That amped her up 😂😂😂😂
I'm not with judge Mathis on this one. The minor situation is disgusting.
I’m confused as to why the audience started clapping when the defendant nastily insulted the plaintiff. JM did some nasty work on this case, and letting them talk over each other was a whole mess 🫠
They took the money. When they say there was no money in her purse or under her mattress...how do they know unless they were searching her belongings.
Huh? Excuse me, she was 16, just turning 17, and had already had a baby by him. I must be missing something cause I could've sworn that was called RAPE. Wth.
How he know that there was no money in there, unless he actually went in there? 😂😂😂😂😂
This was the most Jerry Springer-like episode ever. I have questions about this "couple."
How long were they "dating?"
When did they start "dating?"
Who else knew that they were "dating?"
Where did they meet each other?
Why couldn't she live with her parents?
What did the parents think about this situation?
What exactly made the plaintiff bourgeoisie? She never mentioned the finer things in life or brands. JM had no comment on underage baby making and his criminal record.
This episode makes me think judge be holding some family secrets talking bout 16 and 17 not a minor .
We not gonna skip over “my 30 something inch tv” chill mane lol
😂😂😂😅
We Gon brush over her being a child
Aside from him being disgusting he lied. First he said he told her that he had a girl living there before she even moved in . Then he said she said to him 2 weeks after she moved in that she thought he was single. Why would she think that if she already knew? Everyone is so caught up in her being “boujie” they’re not even listening
And since when can you sue for the same thing twice? Unless it was dismissed without prejudice…
JM leave the girl alone she speak very well 🙄
Right and she had a child by him by 16 that’s NOT OF AGE!!!!!
Didn’t have no interest in her because she’s too old😢😢😮
She mad salty after that L. Dang! 🤣🤣🤣
17 isn’t of age
This is the black girl I’m raising . Bold, confident and classy. Nothing is wrong with it !
The narrator is shady as hell. 😂😂😂
I mean asl! LOL!
The emphasis on 17 😂
I had to rewind that to make sure I wasn't tripping☹️😭
16 is still a baby
Judge just didn’t like her for how she was talking , but he knew they took the money
People who don't like the show, just stop watching, point blank.
21 and SIXTEEN??? wthhhhh forget the plaintiff is annoying asf... that man was messing with a high school student in 10 or 11th grade like tf
The young lady is poised and not what they say and he’s a predator and the judge didn’t once reprimand him
He wasn't interested in the plaintiff because she was grown, apparently children lights his fire.
Ms. Bougie is obnoxious.
The defendants girlfriend is 17? Where’s her parents! Nothing the defendant says is credible!!
Defendants definitely look like they got escorted to class..and JM know he wouldnt have it with his daughters..idc what the state law is some stuff you just dont do..and he was abusive to both women, he shoulda been called out like the others..They stole that money
Lord have mercy! PLEASE get over yourself "your royal highness" because nobody's impressed or intimidated by this arrogance! NEXT! 👑💁🏽♀️🙋🏽♀️🤔🤨😒👎🏾
Ok, how many times did Mathis say “bougie” like it was 2002? I think he was making fun of her vocal cadence, which was annoying of him.
Wonder what Judge meant by his daughter has "regular" friends. He the one looks down on folks. Strip him of his money and what's left. No substance at all. His family half way deal with him now imagine if he wasn't kissing butt with a dollar 🙄
I disagree 17 and 16 that’s a child and this is sick
Bougie = Grown Woman
There’s a difference.
Once judge starts ego trippin, it’s over with. He makes me sick when it comes to stuff like this, he harps on stuff that bruises his fragile ego, but doesn’t harp on the more serious issue. Legal doesn’t always mean moral! 21 with a 16 year old is sick asf idc.
All of them were annoying. Especially Judge.
So JM didn’t hear the defendant’s girlfriend curse 🙄
Update: JM really said his past criminal hx doesn’t matter?!?? 😐
That is not of age judge . That’s a child period
SHE ATEEEE “I’m talking about the child right there” 😂
Nobody talked down on you Mathis! My goodness!
It's a joke
He wasn't joking fool.
@@adrianknight1406 Calling people names now?
This was BLATANTLY WEIRD how Judge Mathis completely glossed over and passed the alleged minor allegations even defending it at a certain point in the case…🤔
Definitely not saying Judge Mathis is into this, but because he is an extremely opinionated Judge, I’m side eyeing the lack of addressing.
Why didn't she run a credit/judicial search on him prior to moving in???
“The child right there” comment ate up the whole case! Kudos, sis!💯😂
The man said that nothing was in the room? How does he know, he had no business in her room. Why didn’t the judge ask him why he was in her room.
I believe they took her $$
Let’s blame Judge Mathis instead of the parents for allowing their 16 year old daughter to date a 21 year old man. Yea that makes a lot of sense.
Is JM slow… she was SIXTEEN up until the day of that incident (maybe younger depending on how long they had been together)… so her turning 17 that day doesn’t magically make it ok. At no point did she talk “down” on him about the law… He claims to love people having knowledge, but is so intimidated when they show it. 🙄 His ego is stressful.
Plaintiff is wild annoying she talks way too much
But she so boogie,but had to room with them
Horrible judgement JUDGE !!!! 17 is OF AGE !!???? Just quit being a judge
Might depend on the state. Not saying that excuses it because it doesn't but 17 might be legal in his state🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
After all if this, he goes on to talk about how she looks and that he could've had her 🤦🏾♀️ so many things wrong with this case.
I see why the Judge Wife left him! Why he defending that guy sleeping with a minor
Wtf is wrong with the comments JM actually got this one right.
The thought that personal opinions have bearing on law. All of a sudden, everyone is so moral in this, one of the most immoral nations in the world.
Good Going Gin, everybody's speaking at one time, I couldn't follow the case.
JM must be related to the defendants. He was quite dismissive of a major crime of statutory rape.
That little girl should have sat down I know she’s embarrassed about this til this day
Disappointed in the judge for brushing off the fact that he's 21 and that little girl was 16. And then saying they're "of age" highly doubt he would be so nonchalant if it was his daughter.