Proving the Immortality of the Soul to Jehovah's Witnesses

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 295

  • @serafin1352
    @serafin1352 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    I was raised a jw and was in for over 30yrs. So I do see their theological viewpoint although muddled with biased and blatant incorrect doctrine. I also see what you are gleaning here. Def deeper research is needed for me personally on this matter. I very much appreciate your work on this, a good starting point for me. Thx

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I'm so glad you made it out of the Watchtower and I'm very grateful that you've been willing to watch my content. I hope it's helpful to you and if you have any questions, just let me know!

    • @Cfalconeri
      @Cfalconeri 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hello, I was also born in and left last year, 40 years of brainwashing. You will get there and the Holy Spirit will guide you. The more I learn directly from the Scriptures and Gospel of Christ the more light becomes brighter and the Truth has set me free. I am happy you are out friend!

  • @GionaSperanza-ne7fh
    @GionaSperanza-ne7fh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you Seth. Wonderful video. Please, how do you explain Gen 3:19 you are clay, and into clay you shall go back?

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Hi @GionaSperanza-ne7fh! I take Genesis 3:19 to be a reference to Adam & Eve's physical bodies. Just as they were made from dust, one day they would die and their physical bodies would return to dust. I don't think it's talking about their *soul* per se. My understanding is that their bodies were created from the ground, but their souls were breathed into them by God (Genesis 2:7) so I see a distinction there. Hope that helps!

    • @vill7777
      @vill7777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I look at it. That god made Man out of the ground when God. breathed into him. He didn't breathe air per se but his very person making man in his image and likeness

    • @GionaSperanza-ne7fh
      @GionaSperanza-ne7fh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@theologywithseth Thanks for your help.

    • @erickreed5981
      @erickreed5981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      IMHO, 100% spot on, just like this vid, thank you!

  • @Sojourner-ambulareinspiritu
    @Sojourner-ambulareinspiritu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    You’ve no idea how helpful this is for me. I was raised in the organization and while I still have nothing but love for my family and those I knew, the theology they believe has always conflicted with what I knew to be biblically true particularly when it comes to this issue - atleast to my understanding. I brought up the immortality of the soul multiple times to my family and to elders and even after pointing out scriptural support I was eventually more or less told to drop it - quite aggressively in one instance by an elder sadly. But I always felt that what they said about the soul dying was just wrong. Thank you so much for your research. It means so much🙏

    • @Sojourner-ambulareinspiritu
      @Sojourner-ambulareinspiritu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TboneWTF Well, I consider everything written in the Bible to be true.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I'm so glad you made it out of the Watchtower! It sounds like the Lord has been at work in your life for a long time now and I'm so glad you enjoyed my video. I've made a handful of videos about JW theology over the last few months so feel free to check out my playlist on them if you're interested! I'll also be in prayer for your family as well

    • @robertmardis2110
      @robertmardis2110 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Same for me as well!

    • @Sojourner-ambulareinspiritu
      @Sojourner-ambulareinspiritu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@theologywithseth thank you! I will check out your other videos for sure 👍

    • @Cfalconeri
      @Cfalconeri 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I always felt the same way too and it never made sense to me that a righteous God fearing person would have the same doom as a wicked person that did evil deeds. The evil one even has the same opportunity at a resurrection, as according to JW's death pays for sin. So with that reasoning too, we never needed Jesus. There is so much wrong with their theology and they are all mentally trapped and living in severe fear that blinds their thinking. We can only pray for them.

  • @FantasyVisuals
    @FantasyVisuals 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    They always quote Ecclesiastes 9:5 to " prove " support their doctrine , unaware that the whole context of that is a metaphor. Which they would know if they were competent scholars

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      True, and it also just amazes me that they'd let a disputed verse from way back in Ecclesiastes nullify *entire stories* in the New Testament that are much closer to the heart of our faith. It's just utter folly and hopefully enough Christians will see this video to know how to graciously demonstrate that to JW's

    • @FantasyVisuals
      @FantasyVisuals 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @theologywithseth revelation ( is it 4:11) the souls of the slain cry out to God in heaven for justice. They try and put THAT down as a metaphor !

    • @universalman5861
      @universalman5861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FantasyVisuals The same souls were given white robes to wear. I'm guessing you did not read that far.

    • @phillipsugwas
      @phillipsugwas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Christianity does not make a case for its core beliefs using proof texts. The Org does, because it starts with its position and seeks out support. Inductive reasoning.

    • @douglasellickson2161
      @douglasellickson2161 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@phillipsugwasreally? then you are not reading the Bible or watching this video because Seth is reading these multiple verses out of the NWT

  • @rickyoung360
    @rickyoung360 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    The fact that the soul lives on after physical death is easy to see in the scriptures. However, the JW's have an authority above Gods Word, the Watchtower. Why take the word of one God when you have a group of corporate executives that tell you otherwise??

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It's very sad, but based on everything I've seen in my JW studies in this series, that seems to be the case. Everything eventually boils down to whatever the Watchtower says, regardless of how clear the Biblical text is. Let's be in prayer that God would help JW's to have eyes to see and ears to hear!

    • @mamajan99
      @mamajan99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      "corporate executives": "They worship by repeating rules made up by humans." Isaiah 29:13

    • @mamajan99
      @mamajan99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A soul without thoughts? Really?
      "His breath will go out, he returns to his earth; in that very day ALL HIS THOUGHTS PERISH. His breath goes forth, he returns to the earth" Ps 146:4 DOA

    • @Bernadette-i3p
      @Bernadette-i3p 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mamajan99 I looked up the Hebrew translation and it says "his spirit" not "his breath". And it says "his plans" not "his thoughts" perish. Whenever I have a question about things (but you probably don't questions verses), I go to the original language it was written in so I can get the proper translation. Bible Hub is great for that. You can even see where that word is used in other verses so you make sure you are correct in your understanding.

    • @robertmardis2110
      @robertmardis2110 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@mamajan99 his physical body....

  • @Frxggay
    @Frxggay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I’d love you to do some videos refuting Mormon/LDS teachings

    • @peterzinya1
      @peterzinya1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mormon is wack. Thats all you need to know.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      They're next! Lord willing, I'm planning on launching an entire series on Mormonism within the next 2-3 months so I hope you'll stick around!

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Hello @Frxggay, I'm very excited to announce that I have officially started the series on Mormonism! I'll link the first video below. Check it out and let me know what you think!
      th-cam.com/video/R6NCa1i9IoY/w-d-xo.html

  • @phaedragalloway4544
    @phaedragalloway4544 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks again Seth! Proving the immortality the Soul... I don't care who you are or what your beliefs are, the immortality of your soul should concern you!
    Luke 16 and Luke 23 should make one sit up and take notice.
    And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” And he said to him, “Truly, I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise.” Luke 23:42-43

  • @rhondahart2416
    @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks so much and you're very loving!

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for watching and commenting!

  • @heatheraustin1246
    @heatheraustin1246 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So Good! Thank you

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm so glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for commenting

  • @TheDejaVuuuuuu
    @TheDejaVuuuuuu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Can you do a video debunking paradise earth?

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I'm planning to make a video about the 144,000 pretty soon so I'm sure I can touch on it then! I hope you'll stick around

    • @TheDejaVuuuuuu
      @TheDejaVuuuuuu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @ I will be looking out for it !

    • @GalaxyCat001
      @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Whats wrong with paradise Earth, the Bible says God will remake the Earth & the Heavens so the new Earth will be a paradise Earth

    • @TheDejaVuuuuuu
      @TheDejaVuuuuuu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@GalaxyCat001 nothing is wrong with your view. JWs believe 144k are in heaven but the “other sheep” remain our Earth without God living with us. The JW paradise earth isn’t biblical not the Christian view.

    • @eve3363
      @eve3363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@TheDejaVuuuuuuUh, that's literally what the Bible teaches! The Bible does not teach when you die, you go to Heaven or Hell. The Bible teaches that you die, your soul rests until Jesus returns, he will resurrect us at Our Father's appointed time, there will be the final battle, then Judgement Day. What's so difficult to understand this? Why do you battle against God's word? It's because you don't love God. You love man.

  • @colonalklink14
    @colonalklink14 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The transfiguration proves them absolutely wrong.

  • @OnYaBoya
    @OnYaBoya 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great presentation @theologywithseth, if I may, I would like to suggest showing the many evidence in the Old Testament too.
    For example in GENESIS we are told Abraham went to rest WITH his forefathers...
    -> Gen 15:15
    15 As for you, you will go to your forefathers in peace; you will be buried at a good old age.
    -> Gen 25:8
    8 Then Abraham breathed his last and died at a good old age, old and satisfied, and was gathered to his people.
    Even David is sent to have went to his people in 2 Sam 7:12.
    We also have Sauls experience with the prophet Samuel's spirit in 1 Sam 28! They have changed the language in verse 14 to "realized", but we can see a spirit there and it has gotten and is recognizable.
    This verse, v14, is an issue for Protestants as Saul bows to the Spirit and the Samuel does not rebuke him.
    We use it to counter modem protestant dissonance against cultural norms of respect and reverence given to people that was NOT intended as worship.
    Some anti- Catholic protestants like to muddy the water on that.
    There are other verses showing similar ideas in the Old Testament that JWs may not have considered and rocks the shaky ground of the "discreet slave" with more false teaching, apart from the obvious credibility loss from the failed prophesies.

  • @KingArtexerxes
    @KingArtexerxes หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am not a JW, but based on much study, I agree with their viewpoint of what happens when you die. Only God is eternal. There is no such thing as a part of man that is eternal. Jesus said to fear God who is able to destroy both body and soul in hell. So, even if there was such a thing as an invisible part of man that lived on after He died, the soul and body would be destroyed at the same time. If you look to see how all the Hebrew and Greek words that were translated into soul and spirit, you’ll see that they were translated as other words also. Looking into the meaning of these words, the primary meaning is breath, breathing, air. In other words, a soul/spirit is the breath of life.

    • @Psylliumhead
      @Psylliumhead หลายเดือนก่อน

      And God is a Spirit, John 4. So does that mean that God is just a mindless breath?

    • @juanitobarcelona7050
      @juanitobarcelona7050 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Absolutely Correct!, I am also not JW, but base of what I read In the Bible theis teaching about death is more accurate than other beliefts for the immortality of the soul. The Bible clearly says " the soul who sin will die."( Eze.18:4). The idea that we are not really die came from Satan.

    • @juanitobarcelona7050
      @juanitobarcelona7050 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Psylliumheadthe Word spirit can have different meaning depends on the context. Please make a resrarch of the meaning of the word spirit

    • @Psylliumhead
      @Psylliumhead 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@KingArtexerxes no, you’re wrong. The Bible is clear. When a believer dies he departs to be with Christ, Philippians 1:23, when an unbeliever dies he goes to hades, Luke 16. God is the only eternal being, eternal and immortal are two different things. God created man with an immortal spirit. All men will spend eternity as a glorified resurrected being or a judged resurrected being, that’s what Jesus is saying when she talks about destroying both body and soul in hell. Read revelation 19 and 20, after 1,000 years of being in hell the beast and false prophet are still there, and those resurrected at the Great White Throne judgement are punished forever. It’s funny how you claim man doesn’t have a soul yet quote scripture that he does have a soul. Unless you’ve studied Hebrew and Greek don’t reference it it just makes you look foolish.

    • @Psylliumhead
      @Psylliumhead 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @ no, you’re wrong, read the response I left on this dumb post. Yes the soul dies, the biblical view of death does not mean cease to exist, you are reading that into it. Death means separation, in this case separation from God.

  • @CalvaryandChristendom
    @CalvaryandChristendom หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey brother! Would it be acceptable for me to clip out smaller parts of your videos and put them on my channel? I'm talking about your explanations of certain Scriptural passages commonly used by JW. Thanks!

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi @CalvaryandChristendom! I'm fine with it as long as you drop a link to my channel in your video's description. Hope you're doing well!

    • @CalvaryandChristendom
      @CalvaryandChristendom หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theologywithseth I am, and thank you I will do that.

  • @rodrigolopez9286
    @rodrigolopez9286 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hello. I AM a member of the LDS Church. About 40 years ago I realized about this passage in Luke 23 and about the comma. JW are very wrong

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hello Rodrigo, thank you for commenting! What is your backstory? Did you convert to Mormonism after being a JW?

    • @erickreed5981
      @erickreed5981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yessir, the comma in the wrong place @ Luke 23:43

    • @RazwanRazaq55555
      @RazwanRazaq55555 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The LDS Church, as the Jehovah’s Witness church, is heretical. I hope you will examine the evidence on my playlists

  • @nateq
    @nateq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Eye opening as always. It's so clear JWs misinterpret the Bible

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed! Thank you for watching

  • @GreggBuckley
    @GreggBuckley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hi Seth, again a very informative video. Thank you.
    However, I would like to comment on Luke 16:19 - 31, and the *parable* of Lazarus and the rich man.
    Why do I believe that it's a parable?
    Well first, I agree that Luke records the Greek, root word Noun παραβολή or parabolē, a total of 16 times in his Gospel, where it isn't recorded here in this instance. And I also agree that in these passages the proper name Lazarus is recorded 4 times too, but that doesn't mean that it isn't an *illustrative teaching* of something that exists, and is real.
    The reason that this is a parable is because it would be *impossible* for Lazarus to enter God's Kingdom.
    Yeshua hadn't finished His work on the Cross yet, and for Lazarus to somehow be able to see and enter God's Kingdom, *contradicts* what Yeshua tell Nicodemus in John 3:2-7.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hi Gregg! Thank you for your thoughtful comment and I appreciate your insight! Either way, as you said, it still teaches about something that really exists- namely, an immediately conscious afterlife for both believers and unbelievers. Cheers!

    • @GreggBuckley
      @GreggBuckley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@theologywithseth On that we both agree brother. God Bless.✝

    • @GreggBuckley
      @GreggBuckley 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @universalman5861 I received a question from you in my inbox, where when I went to reply, I couldn't locate your post, so, I'll try to answer it for you here. You asked me, *So how do you respond to St. Luke 13:28 : "There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out." Is this a parable as well?*
      I suspect that you are wondering how *Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were able to see and enter God's Kingdom prior to Yeshua finishing His work on the Cross* , as I had stated that it was impossible for Lazarus to do so above.
      Though there is more, the quick answer would be, that the Mosaic Law hadn't been employed and put into force yet. *Blood for the atonement for man's souls* (although a foreshadowing) didn't come into effect until it was expressed in Leviticus 17:11.
      (Until *Father God expresses, dictates, or commands an edict* there isn't a law to break.
      This is what Paul means by Romans 4:15, & 5:13, and what John confirms in 1John 3:4.)
      Neither Abram/Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob/Israel were ever guilty of transgressing the Mosaic Law, because the Mosaic Law wasn't revealed until Sinai/Horeb (Deuteronomy 5:1-3.)
      Therefore no *Blood Sacrifice by Yeshua* was required for any of them.
      However, Lazarus (having been after Abraham's life had ended in the parable, and dead while Yeshua was still alive before His finished work on the Cross) would have been (Romans 5:20), and he would have required that *Blood Atoning Sacrifice.*
      None of us can be *born again of the Spirit, or second born* until after Yeshua's sacrifice, and after He had been Glorified, (John 7:39.)
      Whereas (although another foreshadowing), I'm sure that you are aware that Abram was declared to be *Righteous through his Faith* in God's promise (Genesis 15:6., Nehemiah 9:7,8.)
      It was *Father YHVH declaring Abram to be Justified and Righteous* which allowed for him to see and enter God's Kingdom.
      Isaac, and Jacob also demonstrated their faith as well, however, to explain how, would take far too long in this format. I hope that this helped answer your question.

  • @Pootycat8359
    @Pootycat8359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I wrote my previous comment prior to it being mentioned later 😀 But as for "sleep," do these JWs not recall their dreams? And research conducted in "sleep labs" indicates that even during the deepest phase of sleep, we are conscious.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's a great point! Even in sleep, we don't stop existing. Thanks for sharing!

    • @Pootycat8359
      @Pootycat8359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@theologywithseth What's amazing is that in all the JW literature that I've encountered, explaining why we aren't conscious after death, they always mention the Bible passages that compare death with sleep. I know some people don't remember their dreams, but most do.

  • @juanitobarcelona7050
    @juanitobarcelona7050 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Many Bible scholars agree that the story of the rich man and Lazarous is a parable.

  • @Pootycat8359
    @Pootycat8359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Charles Russel got much of his doctrine from a Seventh Say Adventist minister, and the SDA Church maintains we don't have souls that survive physical death. They base their belief on a passage in Ecclesiastes, which states, "The dead know nothing." But Solomon wasn't a prophet, and there's no reason to assume what he wrote was divinely inspired, and besides, that passage can be interpreted in a number of ways.

    • @cygnustsp
      @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Russell had nothing to do with SDA. He was more influenced by christadelphians but rejected their idea that Jesus had no pre-existence.

    • @Pootycat8359
      @Pootycat8359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cygnustsp "Charles Taze Russell ...., or Pastor Russell, was an American Adventist minister..." Apparently, he wasn't just influenced by an SDA minister, he WAS one.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Taze_Russell

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cygnustsp Oh contrare , He was in the SDA for awhile and when he left he ripped off a lot of their ideas.
      The SDA idea of hell and that Jesus is Michael the arch angel is the same as the J Dubs.

    • @cygnustsp
      @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Pootycat8359 no no no Adventist doesn't mean SDA and Russell never knew or cared about Ellen White

    • @cygnustsp
      @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rhondahart2416 he agreed with soul sleep and the Jesus=Michael thing was long held before SDA, but he rejected nearly everything else SDA held. Read carefully and you'll see that while both Russell and White were nutcases they were a product of their time and went entirely different ways while both suggesting modern churches got it wrong. They weren't the only ones, they had acquaintances, but they didn't work that much together. Just read what White and Russell wrote and you'll see very little in common.

  • @jenniferschutz3096
    @jenniferschutz3096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you again for your clear explanations. This is a topic which as a former Seventh Day Adventist I also had to deal with. Actually, the JWs probably got their teaching from them.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jenniferschutz3096 Thank you for sharing that with me! That's true, the SDA and the JW's do have some overlap since they both grew out of the same soil in Nineteenth century America. I'm glad you found my channel!

  • @movingloz
    @movingloz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Wow. So interesting.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think so! Thanks for watching

  • @allandahma4825
    @allandahma4825 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @ADP2085
    @ADP2085 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great information only one caveat thou.. there is a teaching in the in the watchtower theology that explains all of these scriptures for while they dont believe that the vast majority of humans have an immortal soul they DO believe that the anointed class of 144k do an experience all of these scriptures when they die. But for the rest of mankind when they die they ceast to exist. So the jw has to understand first that EVERYONE has a soul that lives on then they can begin to understand that the different aspects of the afterlife

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That is certainly a possible response, but the first resurrection to heaven of the anointed class isn't supposed to have started until 1914 when Christ began his second presence, according to their theology. So that wouldn't explain why Paul expected to go to Heaven immediately upon death, or why there are clearly many "souls" currently interacting with God in Heaven in Revelation 6.
      Moreover, Matthew 22 strongly implies that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were in Heaven even in Jesus's day, and they lived long before Jehovah began choosing his anointed class. Also the rich man who died in Luke 16 clearly didn't go to Heaven, which means he certainly could not have been part of the 144k, yet he was obviously conscious after death.
      Finally, the thief on the cross went to Paradise with Christ the same day he died, so that would be yet another problem with that response.
      So I think if a JW tries to argue in that way, they just need to be reminded of what the Watchtower teaches and it effectively refutes itself. Here's an article you can check out if you want to see their teaching on the 1914 resurrection date...
      www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/what-is-the-resurrection/

  • @DavidPeter-v3e
    @DavidPeter-v3e 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Well done Seth , but the question that I have is - if people were already conscious ( in heaven or hell ) after death, since as you said - Jesus told the Religious leaders - God is a God of the living and not the dead , then why did Jesus need to come and die on the Cross for our sins, if people were already in heaven or hell ?

    • @michellebernal5668
      @michellebernal5668 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      People in the Old Testament who were damned went directly to hell, you cannot escape hell. That’s a state of existence where you are immediately condemned for eternity. Righteous people were in Abraham’s bosom, not technically heaven but more of like a waiting room. Actually technically a type of hell, but it’s a place of comfort. No one is worthy of heaven, nothing impure can get into heaven, so Jesus our savior made us clean so we now have to chance to be with God again. That’s why Jesus went to Abraham’s bosom

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Hi David! That's a great question. I would answer that they were allowed into Heaven on the basis of Christ's *future* sacrifice. Paul says that Christ's sacrifice was to "show God's righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins" (Romans 3:25), which I take to mean that God forgave Old Testament believers with the understanding that Christ would one day pay for their sins. In other words, Christ's sacrifice was still necessary, but the benefits of it were applicable even in Old Testament times. Hope that helps in some way!

    • @DavidPeter-v3e
      @DavidPeter-v3e 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks - but if I may ask - doesn't Jesus say in John 3: 13 - " No one has ascended to heaven but he that came down from heaven. That is, the Son of man who is in heaven. " also in Peter's sermon in Acts 2: 34 he said ; "For David did not Ascend into heaven...."
      So it sounds like to me that no one had yet Ascended to heaven , at least in the time of Jesus and the Apostle Peter.

    • @mailynrebecca
      @mailynrebecca 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DavidPeter-v3eLook up what orthodox say about it. Up to my understanding they have preserved the true faith for the past 2.000 yrs. I am about to convert to orthodox hopefully soon.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theologywithseth Does that also explain Acts 17:30 ?

  • @SleepWalker108
    @SleepWalker108 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Wonderful video! Yesterday I was thinking about how the Holy Bible actually shows the immortality of the soul. Then your video came. Brilliant, sir!

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It must be the Lord's timing! Thank you for watching and I'm so glad it was helpful!

    • @michaelhaigh7258
      @michaelhaigh7258 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We’re dos it say that immortality of the soul ? Plz

  • @JOJACKJAPANLOLAMIYAZAKI
    @JOJACKJAPANLOLAMIYAZAKI 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    ❤❤❤

    • @JOJACKJAPANLOLAMIYAZAKI
      @JOJACKJAPANLOLAMIYAZAKI 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I always watching you sir. I learned so much from your teaching. thank you so much❤️❤️❤️

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I really appreciate that! Thank you for watching

  • @sarahstevens3050
    @sarahstevens3050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    FIRST!!!!

  • @phillipsugwas
    @phillipsugwas 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Instead of seeking out the mistakes of the Org- they are legion why can an Org devotee clearly not provide any ( repeat , any ) credible evidence that something( anything) that the Org has ruled on or done or predicted actually was true and correct... and has brought a visible benefit to their adherents ( that drops the bar considerably)?

  • @skykiss12
    @skykiss12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me these things.
    Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book: worship God.: Revelation 22:8,9.
    And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." Rev. 19:10
    That was not an angel, but a departed saint prophet. The Angels of God do not have the testimony of Jesus, coz they don't need it, having never been lost.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would have said prophet . In Revelation there is a large Angel that stands upon the seas calling out for people to come to Christ so he is testifying. When people go to heaven we don't become angels.

  • @rogersacco4624
    @rogersacco4624 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about immortal souls of a baby or 2 year old,?Living to god?

    • @cygnustsp
      @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Augustine talked about the quickening of fetuses and when they'd achieve personhood. It's all conjecture. Christianity has to make stuff up.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Romans 5:13 Sin was in the world before the law but sin is not charged when there is no law.
      It can be argued this way when is there no law? When you don't understand right from wrong. When is that?
      When you are too young which is a baby or small child.
      Romans 7:9 Paul says almost the same thing in this verse also.
      Also when David committed sin with Bathsheba their son died as a result of their sin.
      When asked why he fasted before the baby died and after he died David washed and ate, David replied that his son can not come to him but he will go to his son one day.
      We know that David was righteous so he meant with the Lord.

  • @leeBoB4257
    @leeBoB4257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You start talking about the soul in the Greek Scriptures I'll start in the Hebrew Scriptures with a king James Bible of 1887 the first time the word Soul is used concerning a Human is where we read at Genesis 2:7 which says And the lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed in to his nostrils the breath of life and the "man" "BECAME "A LIVING SOUL (nephesh) he wasn't given a soul he was the soul. Now read verse 17 , now Chapter 3 :4 the first LIE that man would not Die that LIE is still being taught, now read 3:19 where is Adam going to end up, still alive after he Dies like The Devil told him or where God told him where he would end up. Now read 5:5. Now tell me where Adam eventually ended up he ended up where he came from the Dust .Just one more Scripture Ezekiel 18:4. Please makeup your own mind what is the meaning of the word soul is it the person or something inside the person that can't DIE or can the soul DIE.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nephesh is not used exclusively in Hebrew as man is a soul.

    • @leeBoB4257
      @leeBoB4257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @rhondahart2416 Who said it was i said when MAN was created he Became a living Soul Nephesh I didn't say an Animal Soul Nephesh .

    • @leeBoB4257
      @leeBoB4257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @rhondahart2416 Who said it was i said when MAN was created he Became a living Soul Nephesh I didn't say an Animal Soul Nephesh .

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @leeBoB4257 I said Nepsesh in Hebrew is not used exclusively for man is a soul.
      It's also understood as man has a soul.

    • @leeBoB4257
      @leeBoB4257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @rhondahart2416 Please state Scriptures to back up what your saying, so if the first man Adam was a Soul and as you suggest he has a Soul where is Adam's Soul,and where did it go when he Died.

  • @Cfalconeri
    @Cfalconeri 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video. I was born in and left last year after 40 years. Very tough time and long story, but I made it with the help of our Lord Christ Jesus. I no longer believe what the JW's believe but I will say that when you counter them with sound scriptural arguments and reasoning, they will fall on non scriptural reasoning and start spouting historical opinions and secular history. One thing they will say is that the immortality of the soul is pagan. Everything to them is pagan and once it is labeled pagan they will not listen. So, I don't know what arguments we could use to counter the so called "it's a pagan teaching" mantra they love to repeat. So to them holidays are pagan, the cross is pagan, the trinity or "triune god" is pagan, birthdays are pagan, immortality of the soul, praying to Jesus is worshiping a man, and I can go on and on.
    One argument I have used is they need to throw away their calendar, take off their wedding ring, stop celebrating anniversaries and baby showers (as in line with their so called "self worship" argument they have against birthdays), don't allow your employer to give you a paid day off for a holiday, unplug your cable television as your directly entertained by the so called "world," stop driving on interstates as they were designed to easily mobilize the military and they don't believe in military service; now I am getting silly. Anyways, just a thought because I know what they are going to say and when they feel cornered, this is not hard to do, they shut down or wig out.
    Oh, and good point about the Sadducees' and JW's, the Governing Body act as modern day Pharisees ironically enough.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much for sharing that with me! I'm delighted to hear you've made it out of the Watchtower and have placed your faith in the Biblical Christ! Those are some great points about wedding rings and calendars. Paganism is such a broad spectrum of beliefs and practices that just about everything can probably be traced back to it in some way. When faced with the "Pagan" accusation, I would just ask if I could explain why I believe what I believe *without* using any pagan sources whatsoever and only using the Bible. Do you think that would be fair enough in the eyes of an active JW?

  • @lanialania8387
    @lanialania8387 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Paul was anointed by God and when the anointed die they go to heaven. The scripture in Revelation is a vision John had and all those he saw that were crying out to Jesus were Gods anointed. Only the Chosen have a hope to Reign with Christ in Heaven.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lanialania8387 That's an interesting take! I thought the resurrection didn't happen until *after* the battle of Armageddon though. Is that not correct?

    • @GalaxyCat001
      @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theologywithseth The 1st resurrection is of the Jews that were saved (pre church & post church) and go into the millennial kingdom. The Rapture is a separate resurrection from that of the Jewish program of events,. Church & Jews are separate once the rapture takes place.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @FrankLee-gq8yc Frank! First off, where have you been? I haven't heard from you and I was actually starting to get a bit worried. I'm not understanding your comment though. Can you try rephrasing it?

  • @GalaxyCat001
    @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    21:07 Also if you cease to exist when you die then God recreates you from information He has about you. Consequently He could create 100 'yous' if He wanted to & have them running around in Heaven. Clearly they can not all be the original person. If however you don't cease to exist, then God can only resurrect 1 true you, any others He made, if He did, would be acknowledged as being copies.
    Its not so much that consciousness has to survive death but that something that is you & unique to you needs to survive death and is needed for you to be resurrected, this probably is consciousness but could be something else, spirit etc. Alternatively your consciousness may survive death but in an inactivated state until resurrection.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly! That's why it's so important that there's an unbroken continuation of consciousness from "you" today to "you" at the resurrection. Otherwise, you could work for Jehovah all your life but *somebody else* gets your rewards! That would disturb me to no end if I were a JW

    • @GalaxyCat001
      @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theologywithseth Well something that is you needs to continue, its probably consciousness but it could also be a consciousness in a deactivated state that is reactivated when God reunites it with a body.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GalaxyCat001 1 Thessalonians 4:13-14 refutes that.
      Scripture can not contradict itself.

    • @GalaxyCat001
      @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rhondahart2416 Refutes what exactly, its not clear what you are trying to say by quoting that bible verse

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GalaxyCat001 Paul is stating that Jesus is bringing with Him the souls , their bodies are asleep. If they're with Him then they're fully conscious.
      Verse 16 states that the bodies will rise, meaning they will be glorified and be reunited with the soul.

  • @bygeorgehemayberite8385
    @bygeorgehemayberite8385 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So the religion actually do believe in the cited scriptures used to debunk their theology; the problem is, they’ve been taught (& this can be found throughout various articles in their publications) that the New Testament is primarily written for anointed Christians, only.
    So these passages apply to their 144,000, & not mankind in general. Even 1 Tim. 2:5 have been said to only apply to “men” who r anointed, & that the other sheep r benefactors based upon how they treat Christ’s brothers.
    So there’s some caveat to this belief.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I don't think it solves the problems. One of the passages I use in the video (Matthew 22) implies Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are in Heaven even though they lived before Jehovah began choosing his anointed class. Likewise, the rich man in Luke 16 lived on after he died, but he clearly wasn't in heaven, which means he wasn't one of the 144,000 either. Plus, where would they get the idea that those other passages *only* refer to the "anointed class" in the first place? Does *even one Bible verse* say that anywhere? Seems like a desperate attempt to reinterpret the Bible to fit preconceived theology which is a bad move on anyone's part.

    • @bygeorgehemayberite8385
      @bygeorgehemayberite8385 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @
      And now u see y they’ve moved the comma at Luke 23:42-43. The other part of their theology is that they teach no one entered into heaven before Jesus, including the criminal who put faith in Jesus.
      By moving the comma, it changes the context to fit their teaching that anyone dies before Jesus is sleeping in death, awaiting to be resurrected to earth. Since the criminal who put faith in Jesus died right before Jesus, the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society found themselves in a pickle w/ that passage b/c it reads as an imminent promise; by moving the comma, it reads as Jesus is a making a statement that day, for a future reward.
      That’s the cleverness that’s been used to deceive their members.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @bygeorgehemayberite8385 Yeah, I remember stumbling across that for the first time. The New World Translation is full of subtle (and not-so-subtle) tricks like that. Even when I use it in my videos, I have to read it very carefully first just to make sure it still communicates what it's supposed to communicate.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@theologywithseth Amen

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @FrankLee-gq8yc Frank, the old testament states Elijah was taken to heaven in a chariot.
      There is indication that the spirits of people were kept in Abraham's bosom which is located in a separate section of Hades .
      When Jesus said Today you will be with Me in Paradise He wasn't talking about heaven because He arose on the third day.

  • @CaptBeefart1
    @CaptBeefart1 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Maybe Jesus would not engage In any small talk.

  • @mattmurdock2868
    @mattmurdock2868 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Christ csme to preach the gospel to the living and the dead.
    The three days the body of Jesus lay in the tomb, this is what Christ was doing in the Spirit...
    "They will give an account to Him who is ready to judge the living and the dead. For this reason the gospel was preached also to those who are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit."
    1.Pet.4:5,6

  • @cygnustsp
    @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First century Christianity was originally very terrestrial. Paul expected an earthly kingdom. A brief, very brief period where believes would meet Jesus"in the air" (whatever that means) and then to have glorified bodies but not in heaven, right here on earth. This whole "heaven when you die" stuff became popular after the predictions of Jesus and Paul didn't happen and the Jewish view of the kingdom didn't happen. I have never understand why Christians insist that the greeks were right and the Jews were wrong all along.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why does it have to be one or the other? Couldn't it be true that when Christians die, their souls go to be with God in Heaven, but then when Jesus returns and raises us from the dead, we get physical bodies to live with him on a renewed Earth?

    • @cygnustsp
      @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @theologywithseth that's the argument I gave to my JW mother, kindly. If nothing survives death, what is there to resurrect? You wouldn't be you, you'd be a copy of you. It's all very mysterious and will always be so.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @cygnustsp You're spot-on! Christianity has historically taught that even though our souls to to be with God in Heaven immediately upon death, that's technically a *temporary* state of existence. In fact, systematic theology textbooks often refer to it as "the intermediate state". But we also believe that one day, Jesus will come back to Earth, raise all believers from the dead, and our souls will be reunited to glorified physical bodies and we'll live with Christ on a perfect earth forever. Since there's a continuous line of consciousness, the resurrected person is still *us* . I made a video about it a while back and I'll link it below. Hope it helps a bit!
      th-cam.com/video/2Ap_boWkggo/w-d-xo.html

    • @mailynrebecca
      @mailynrebecca 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@theologywithsethThat‘s how it is and will be! Also according orthodox teaching, which have been preserved and never changed since 33 A.D. Former JW speaking. 😊

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read 1 Thessalonians 4:13,14

  • @cesarguadarrama8732
    @cesarguadarrama8732 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    If there is inmortality, there s no need for resurection

    • @mr.boboman5701
      @mr.boboman5701 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not true at all. God created Adam and Eve. With a body and soul and with a plan. But they fell. And then now all flesh died through them. Soo the resurrection returns our body to Adam and eves original state but even better.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I would agree with @mr.boboman5701. God's ideal is not for us to be disembodied spirits forever. His ultimate aim is to have us resurrected in a glorified body made new, on a perfect Earth to dwell with God forever. But none of that takes away from the fact that our souls still live on immediately after we die

    • @worshipjesus275
      @worshipjesus275 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The point of resurrection is that we have a corrupt body and he wants to give us new body a sinless one

  • @Psylliumhead
    @Psylliumhead หลายเดือนก่อน

    So Stephen was full of God’s active force. 😂😂

  • @mamajan99
    @mamajan99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Im-Mortality" means no death. See 2 Thessalonians 1:9 "eternal destruction" = Death,
    αἰώνιον ὄλεθρον (aiōnion olethron) The second death of Revelation is not "immortality" by any means. See Rev. 2:11, 20:6, 20:14, and 21:8

  • @caribbeanman3379
    @caribbeanman3379 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You've misapplied Matthew 22. Jesus wasn't suggesting that the soul is immortal. Jesus was defending the belief in the resurrection. Jesus explicitly mentions "resurrection" in his answer. He was speaking about the future resurrection and not about the state of those currently dead. The Sadducees not only disbelieved the immortal soul, they also disbelieved the future resurrection. Jesus was refuting the latter - not the former. When Jesus says the patriarchs are alive to God, he is saying that because of the reality of the future resurrection, in God's mind these now dead patriarchs are as good as living. To God they're just temporarily asleep. Death in the truest sense, is eternal and irreversible. So because of the resurrection, they're not truly dead - in the truest sense of the word - because God knows he will raise them up in the future.
    It's dishonest to use Jesus' statement about the future resurrection and pretend it refers to whether or not the soul lives on at death.

  • @bearer-of-christ
    @bearer-of-christ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Death is often called "sleep"
    One of your arguments is sleep is temporary.. death is also temporary.. with god the resurrection makes death temporary...

  • @Psylliumhead
    @Psylliumhead หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really the rich man is in hades. Hell is the final place of judgement in Revelation 19,20.

  • @cygnustsp
    @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I exited the JWs a long time ago
    I've never thought the Bible or Jesus or Paul thought the immortality of the soul was a thing as today's Christians believe. Yeah Christians got that idea from the greeks eventually but the Bible gives mixed messages. The thing is "resurrection" doesn't make sense either way.

    • @rhondahart2416
      @rhondahart2416 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We have to remember that God's ways are not our ways. If we have a god that we fully understand then we don't have the one true God.
      Deut.29:29 The secret things are for God to use but the things He chooses to reveal to the people are for them to use.

  • @patrickpayne
    @patrickpayne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are sadely mistaken if you think you can convince a JWs that the soul is immortal. Not once does the Bible say we possess an immortal soul that cannot die. We are nothing more than our memories

    • @douglasellickson2161
      @douglasellickson2161 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I would watch the video his information is refutable, take your watchtower lens off & read the Bible only. By the way, Seth is using the NWT

    • @patrickpayne
      @patrickpayne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Adam became a living soul he was not given a soul. i see nothing that convinces me that possess a spirit or an eternal soul. JWs put their hope in the resurrection and so did early Christians.

  • @bearer-of-christ
    @bearer-of-christ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Where is adam and eve? Heaven or hell? Or else where. I know Trinitarians who say both.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The Bible doesn't explicitly say, but I've always been of the mindset that Adam and Eve are in Heaven. The reason I say this is because God had mercy on them in the Garden of Eden. He didn't take their lives when they sinned even though He had every right to, and he even goes so far as to cover over their shame with animal skins that He Himself made for them (Genesis 3:21). This seems to be a foreshadow of Christ covering our sin and shame with his sacrifice and it would seem strange for God to perform this gracious and loving gesture for them, only to turn right around and annihilate them forever. But that's just me. I hope that helps!

    • @bearer-of-christ
      @bearer-of-christ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@theologywithsethwhat did god say there punish was. From dust you are to dust you shall return. He didn't say and then join me in heaven. Why would they go to heaven when they were supposed to live forever on earth?

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @1highsheep Well, if my conviction is correct, then one day they *will* live forever on earth, just like us! Your question pertains to where Adam and Eve are *today* , and I think the evidence, little though it is, points in the direction of Heaven. But that's not a hill I want to die on. I would encourage you to focus more on the main points brought up in the video, as opposed to a speculative question about Adam and Eve. Let me know if you have any other questions!

    • @bearer-of-christ
      @bearer-of-christ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@theologywithseth well i did make another comment. Tbh there is to much in the video to discuss and you have plenty of people to talk to, so thanks for taking the time to respond. But my question i feel pertains to the video. If they are in the grave without an immortal soul, That would make sense to me. God said from dust you are to dust you shall return. It's a fair assumption that if they were in heaven we would know. It would really back up when you die you go to heaven. Just like Enoch. The Bible says Enoch walked with God: and he was no more; for God took him" (Gen 5:21-24).
      Then Jesus said no man has ascended to heaven. So enoch much like Adam and Eve were not in heaven when jesus walked the earth. So they were just dead. They weren't in limbo. They were just dead. Sleeping. Temporary untill the day of judgment.

    • @universalman5861
      @universalman5861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@1highsheep Believe me, you will get no further response from Seth. You cited probably the most critical scripture: they return to dust, which was not analysed in the video. The video is a propaganda tool meant to pander to the most uncritical of minds.

  • @caribbeanman3379
    @caribbeanman3379 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But by implication, doesn't Ezekiel 18's use of the word soul in this way teach us that the word soul simply refers to a person and not some immortal personality that lives on after death? Ezekiel 18 is not the only OT verse that does this. There are even OT verses that literally and explicitly speak of "dead soul[s]"! The word soul is even used to refer to animals. Do animals also have an immortal soul that survives death? You're clearly wrong about the word soul. The soul evolved over time to the point that it means something today that is entirely different to what it mean to ancient Bible writers. You're wrongly reading modern usage of the term back into the Bible. If you do an exhaustive search into the number of ways the word is used in the OT you will see the word as used in the Bible, is different to how Christians use it today.
    Regarding your point about re-interpreting the OT in light of the NT is hilarious. If Christianity is an illegitimate, apostate offshoot of Judaism, then your suggested approach is a sure fire way of remaining deceived. Your suggestion is akin to a Mormon saying that the Bible needs to be re-interpreted in light of what the Book Of Mormon says.

  • @Pootycat8359
    @Pootycat8359 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't HAVE a soul, I AM one, and have a body. I know, because I've had one OBE, for sure, and a few more possible ones.

  • @ronhansen8471
    @ronhansen8471 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    There is no afterlife unless you are a Baal worshiper or Catholic. When people die, they cease to exist according to God's word the bible. If they suffer a second death they cease to exist for eternity.
    (Ecclesiastes 3:19, 20) for there is an outcome for humans and an outcome for animals; they all have the same outcome. As the one dies, so the other dies; and they all have but one spirit. So man has no superiority over animals, for everything is futile. 20 All are going to the same place. They all come from the dust, and they all are returning to the dust.
    (Ecclesiastes 9:5) For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing at all, nor do they have any more reward, because all memory of them is forgotten.
    (Ecclesiastes 9:10) Whatever your hand finds to do, do with all your might, for there is no work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the Grave, where you are going.
    (Psalm 146:3, 4) Do not put your trust in princes Nor in a son of man, who cannot bring salvation. 4 His spirit goes out, he returns to the ground; On that very day his thoughts perish.

    • @ravikeller9626
      @ravikeller9626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Lol! Tell me you didn’t watch the video without telling me you didn’t watch the video

    • @sarahstevens3050
      @sarahstevens3050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ???? My friend did you watch the video or are you just commenting a snap judgment????

    • @sarahstevens3050
      @sarahstevens3050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ravikeller9626 😂

    • @reelmsy3831
      @reelmsy3831 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ecclesiastes 9:5 refers to the state of resting death (which the poor man lazarus gets in the New Testament) before Jesus' sacrifice created a different fate for us faithful. Revelation refers to this fate.

    • @ronhansen8471
      @ronhansen8471 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ravikeller9626 What video? I never watch these videos as they are designed to denigrate JW's and the JW organization. Proving immortality of the soul to JWs is not difficult considering Jesus Christ was given immortality and all those selected from earth to be part of his heavenly kingdom will be given immortality. The Bible states the soul can die: “The soul that is sinning-it itself will die.” (Ezekiel 18:4)

  • @ianwinton7692
    @ianwinton7692 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There's not one scripture that says the soul leaves the body. The scriptures you quote you twist. If you look at the Hebrew word naphesh it literally means person. Same as in the christian greek scriptures. There's nowhere in the bible . You are talking rubbish. I've read many different bibles through many times and research the Hebrew and greek on this mater. You are twisting verses. Ezekiel said the soul that is sining it itself will die. There's many more.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hi there! Which Scripture(s) did I "twist" and how?

  • @darrenkoglin3423
    @darrenkoglin3423 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro the scriptures state the soul can be destroyed by the Almighty

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      But how do you know the word "destroy" means to "wipe out of existence"? Even in English we frequently use it to mean other things. If you get "destroyed" in a sport or a debate, you still exist. It's just that you've been utterly defeated. Wouldn't that be a preferable interpretation instead of having to desperately explain away all the verses that teach an immortal soul in Scripture?

    • @darrenkoglin3423
      @darrenkoglin3423 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @theologywithseth the very first lie satan told eve is that she wouldn't die,the Almighty told her if u eat from that tree from that day you will positively die well she didn't die on that day and she showed it to Adam so he ate what we had there was a misunderstanding eve didn't die on that day but she surely did die the same goes for now satan has the majority of those whom believe in a higher power eg God believing that well no u dont die u go off into some never never land well this is false once u die that's it until the resurrection then those who accept the messiah of YHWH and live according can keep living but those whom don't and ignore this suffer what is known as the 2nd death which is for eternity

    • @GalaxyCat001
      @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Even if God can destroy the soul, that doesn't mean that you don't have a soul that survives your physical death that, if you are not saved, goes into a holding place that is not pleasant & that is ultimately destroyed nu God at some future point.

  • @shawnamoen5026
    @shawnamoen5026 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your videos but you have some scriptures wrong. You say luke 24 43 but you are quoting Luke 23 43. Several others are marked wrong also

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh no! I'm usually a stickler about that sort of thing, but occasionally it does happen. I just went back through my slides to double-check everything, but the Luke 23:43/24:43 mix-up was the only issue I could find. What other verse(s) were marked wrong?

  • @ELNENEPR50
    @ELNENEPR50 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What you need to understand the Paul kind of roll his own Gospels, he actually teach a lot of doctrines that Jesus Christ never thought. A lot of scholars agrees that Paul created his own version of Christianity. And yes in the Bible says that when you die you will go to like a non-existence until God resurrection and you go to judgment Day, which is going to be after the Armageddon that has not happened yet so you can be judge and that's when you gain eternal life or eternal death. It doesn't make any sense that if I die now I'm in heaven and then I go to judgement day and then I stay in heaven. So why go to! Use common sense please.. and also in the Bible says that yes that God is able to terminate the soul.

    • @shojwiebelhaus1391
      @shojwiebelhaus1391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In order for this to be given any credibility we would need to see the other apostles disagreeing with Paul which we don't. Jesus revealed himself to Paul, Paul's words were immortalized in scripture, if the Holy Spirit spoke to Paul it wouldn't matter if Jesus didn't teach those things while he was ministering. However we also don't know that Jesus didn't think and teach those things, just because they aren't included in the four gospels doesn't mean it wasn't something that Jesus didn't cover with his disciples in private; so much of Jesus' life and ministry was not recorded.
      Also the biggest group of people saying Paul has his own version of Christianity are Muslims. I don't know what your beliefs are but if Muslims are agreeing with you its pretty safe to assume your the one with the incorrect view on the Bible.

    • @GalaxyCat001
      @GalaxyCat001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jesus ministry was to the Jews whereas Paul was tasked to minister to the gentiles. The Jews rejected Jesus so God turned around & for a time is offering grace to the gentiles & Paul is our main apostle on that. When the church age ends (rapture) God will again turn His attention back to the Jews but that 2 groups are treated slightly differently though they both need to believe & accept Jesus.

  • @kathleen2992
    @kathleen2992 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They would simply explain that those are the 144,000

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Hmmm... I don't think that explanation would work for Matthew 22 since it speaks of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as being in Heaven, when they lived long before Jehovah began choosing his 144,000. What do you think?

    • @cygnustsp
      @cygnustsp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@theologywithsethand yet John says nobody has ascended to heaven except the Son so there's that

    • @shojwiebelhaus1391
      @shojwiebelhaus1391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@cygnustsp Elijiah, he went up to heaven. Jesus was talking about people going to and returning from Heaven saying he was the only one to ever do that and so he was the only one with authority to truly speak on it. In order to say emphatically that "no one has gone up to heaven" you have to contradict other parts of scripture.

  • @eve3363
    @eve3363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can you go to Heaven when you die when the Bible teaches everyone will be resurrected? You're not a disciple of Christ but an agent of the Devil

  • @universalman5861
    @universalman5861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The words translating 'soul' can be used to refer to life a person presently has and/or his future life prospects. I am appalled that 1 Peter 3:20 was not examined in this video where it states that "eight souls were saved by water". (KJV) I am also appalled that in a video claiming to examine the biblical basis for the immortality of the soul, the Hebrew and Greek words for soul (nephesh, psyche) were not considered.
    Be that as it may, let's look back at the first 'analysis' of JW support for a mortal soul. At Ecclesiastes 9:5.Seth claims that this verse was written from Earth's perspective not Heaven's perspective at the 24:30 timestamp. He explains that the vantage point is "from under the sun". Fine. Unfortunately for Seth the condition of the dead is given EXTENDED TREATMENT in this chapter. Ecc 9:10 states: "Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest." Now let's ask Seth's question : where is the "vantage point"? It is the GRAVE. BOTH verse 5 and verse 10 are speaking about the SAME EVENTUALITY. Seth says at the 24:47 timestamp that this verse is not teaching us about the afterlife, and yet verse 10 pinpoints that this is the fate of all who descend into the grave . How is this NOT the afterlife?

    • @serafin1352
      @serafin1352 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Ecclesiastes must be read in context. Also note the writer wrote this based on known facts and knowledge of the day (before Christ on earth)

    • @universalman5861
      @universalman5861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @serafin1352 Yes, by all means, please EXPLAIN WHAT CONTEXT you believe I am missing. Is this man not writing under inspiration of the Holy Spirit?

    • @ravikeller9626
      @ravikeller9626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@universalman5861You seem to be “appalled” at literally everything Seth posts. So… why do you continue to come back for more? Do you just like fighting with strangers on the internet or something?

    • @universalman5861
      @universalman5861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ravikeller9626 I am appalled that you did not state what I am appalled about. I am also appalled that you would make a post so bereft of substance.

    • @RowanTasmanian
      @RowanTasmanian 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@universalman5861here we go again Universal. You are appalled?
      The academy award for overacting goes to you again.
      Calm down

  • @OR-TRIMPLE7
    @OR-TRIMPLE7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The speaker on this video. You are a pastor? I think you are a born again. Hehehe. You know guys there are so many truth. you need to learn about the truth. You are very thankful we cannot answer your issues in personally. I'm sure you feel ashame if I wiil expose your false doctrine

    • @jamesritter5078
      @jamesritter5078 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Your post is nothing but mere assertions. They may have felt good to type, but that's all they are - Mere assertions; nothing more.

  • @WilfredoPastera
    @WilfredoPastera 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello Seth,can you pls read Genesis 2:7 (old kjv)and use your brain to analyze it very carefully.I think you’re just talking too much nonsense.

    • @jamesritter5078
      @jamesritter5078 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I'll suggest that _you_ use _your_ brain to analyze your own post - It is nothing but mere assertion.

    • @jamesritter5078
      @jamesritter5078 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      From what I've read, the terms "soul" and "spirit" are used interchangeably in the Bible to describe the immaterial part of a person.
      And the witness of Scripture is that Christ did not rise "an invisible spirit creature" as JWs teach. Luke 24:39-43 refutes them.

    • @theologywithseth
      @theologywithseth  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I have to agree with @jamesritter5078. In fact, if anyone missed it, the nature of Christ's resurrected body was precisely the subject I dealt with in my last video! Check it out and I'd love to hear everyone's comments over there. Link below
      th-cam.com/video/3Wg9Gt-HlrM/w-d-xo.html

    • @jamesritter5078
      @jamesritter5078 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @FrankLee-gq8yc In my previous post, I referenced what Christ Himself stated. His own words _very_ clearly state that He did not rise "an invisible spirit creature" as the JWs teach. JW teaching goes directly against what Christ Himself declared to the disciples.
      JWs believe and teach that Christ is _really_ Michael the angel/archangel. This belief is falsehood. Here are a few reasons why that's true:
      Look at John 14:7-9 and what Christ declared to Thomas and Philip. Michael would not make those declarations about himself. His name means "Who Is Like God?"
      Obvious answer: NO ONE.
      If Michael had made those declarations, he would be going against the meaning of his own name and committing blasphemy.
      For the same reasons, Michael would also not accept for himself the declaration of Thomas in John 20:28.
      Also - There are no Scriptures that refer to Christ as Michael.
      As for your idea that Christ _was_ raised "an invisible spirit creature" - That means He then manufactured fake bodies with FAKE wounds in Luke 24 (and for Thomas in John 20). No, sorry - I don't believe Jesus Christ is a liar and deceiver.

    • @jamesritter5078
      @jamesritter5078 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @FrankLee-gq8yc That's okay - I've started 4 responses to your post above, and have deleted all of them. I have tried and tried to not be abrasive in responding, but I'm not sure this is going to happen.
      Let's just say that I have found the JWs to be..... _"significantly lacking"_ when it comes to honestly engaging in actual "reasoning" when it comes to their beliefs. Besides what I wrote in my previous post, there's this:
      JWs have a false, unbiblical way of salvation. Here's how and why that's true: The JW "leaders" have claimed for themselves without _ANY_ biblical support whatsoever the following: They are the only, ONLY ones who...
      - were appointed and anointed by God and have His approval and ALL others are false, wrong, apostate, of Satan and so on.
      - are the only, ONLY communicators of God's truth and ALL others are false, wrong, apostate, of Satan and so on.
      - are the only, ONLY ones who can interpret the Bible correctly and ALL others are false, wrong, apostate, of Satan and so on.
      - are the only, ONLY ones who have the genuine message of salvation and ALL others are false, wrong, apostate, of Satan and so on.
      And they have also declared that a person absolutely MUST become a JW in order to have the possibility of maybe gaining salvation one day.
      Now - The above listing are some central core essential beliefs of JWs. And to be a JW means that a person is absolutely 100% REQUIRED to believe the listing above - without question - for the possibility of MAYBE gaining salvation one day.
      The problem is - *NONE* of these central core essential JW beliefs or requirements listed above are biblical. They have NOTHING in the way of biblical support.
      Over the years, I have asked numerous JWs to answer that challenge with real, actual reasoning. I have asked, "Why do you believe this listing? These are central core JW _doctrines_ - believing them is absolutely essential to your possibility of salvation, and they have ZERO biblical support. The central core of your "faith" has _nothing_ biblically to substantiate it. So, on WHAT are you basing your faith?"
      The JW either changes the subject or (most often) just abruptly ends the conversation and leaves.

  • @mikehoncho73637
    @mikehoncho73637 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nothing u say can even phase them. They have the canned answer on deck and have had this same conversation 10 times already. They are much better at this than you are this is all they do all day everyday. Even when u bring them concrete blatant bible changings it doesnt matter