Just wish this 2.7 was offered with the 10-speed. I'm sure the 8 is okay, but a bit weary given some other owners experiences with that transmission. The 10 isnt perfect either, but I think the superior transmission overall.
@Michael H well they playing the planned obsolescence playbook of all auto companies these days, even Toyota and Honda don’t make quality long lasting cars anymore
@@williamerazo3921 Toyota doesn't make long lasting cars anymore? What metrics do you measure that by? They're extremely conservative in changes and testing new powertrains. Their hybrid ECVTs for example in Rav4/Hylander/Sienna/Prius (for example) are based on same ones made 20 years ago and just been refined each generation. All those also come with naturally aspirated engines and the ECVTs are less complex and higher reliability then auto transmissions. New turbo engines like in Tundra have no history to show relability. Will have to wait 3+ years.
@Michael H Both the 8 and 10 speeds are serviceable. They have 2 methods of filling them with fluid (the plug where the dipstick used to be or the dealer pan plug fill method) and the fluid level can be checked via the level check plug in the pan. They just aren't as DIY friendly, but they can be serviced.
Personally, I love that digital instrument cluster, and I think overall Iike it better than the Tundra. My preference is the classic rounded, which is really sharp. Generally, seems like a hugely improved interior, which I think GM realized it needed badly.
Great to see someone looking at the 4 banger with some seriousness. Did you know that they’re bringing back the sawed off Chevy this year with that engine only? Would be cool to see someone review the single cab with 6’ bed as the shortest half ton on the market.
Thanks for this really good review. Can hardly wait for your more detailed review of the LT especially with the 2.7 High Output (GM speak). If I had the money, my purchase would be the LT package. I always thought the those extra tier packages (RST, High Country, LTZ, etc.) is nothing more than extra fluff over the LT package.
Great review. These companies aren't making these little engines to piss people off. It costs enormous amounts of money and time to develop them. They are under tremendous pressure to go with smaller engines and to heavily invest in EV. I predict that within 20 years you won't be able to buy a new V8. I hope I'm wrong. I love my 6.2 but these little turbos are the future whether we like it or not. It wasn't that long ago that full size V8 sedans were everywhere. Now they are gone forever.
Appreciate the honesty of how you felt about the pre-refresh design as I fully agree with you. Still not a fan of the exterior or interior design on this refresh although I will recognize the interior is an improvement over the absolutely dreadful pre-refresh interior. I would say the interior is on par with the F150 which is progress for Chevy. I would still get a Ram as I think it's a much nicer offering although I do appreciate Chevy's many engine options.
@@Ryan2022 That's why I really like GM actually. They have TWO V8 engines available, the 5.3L being the most efficient gas engine in the lineup actually! 😝 (Please, please, ignore the 4-cylinder.) The diesel is also the best in the half-ton segment with the exhaust brake and the inline-6 cylinder arrangement.
@@Ryan2022 You know what's funny? The 2.7L Turbo doesn't even get good mileage. Here are the Car and Driver highway MPG numbers: 2.7L I4 Turbo: 18 MPG 6.2L V8: 19 MPG 5.3L V8: 21 MPG 3.0L I6 Turbodiesel: 26 MPG
Never been a fan of Chevy trucks, but you made me kind of wanna like this one lol. Fantastic presentation, and you got it out fast while still easy to listen to so the video isn't 1 hour+.
If you don't need a full size truck then the maverick I'll be just fine and save you some money. If you need a full size truck then it doesn't matter how much money you save, you won't be happy. If you need a full size then you could buy a used full size for the price of a new maverick. Just saying.
If you're waiting for prices to go down they won't on new autos. You'd need deflation for prices to go down (central banks won't allow deflation, claim to target 2% when we're currently at 8.5% as reported by fake government numbers. Real inflation around 17% year over year). Used autos might go down a tad with gigantic price jumps last couple years but even then unlikely with massive money printing by central banks last 2 years led by US (40% of all US dollars printed ever done in last 2 years).
Mpg on this 4 cyl is surprisingly unimpressive. In my recent trip across the country, I got 20 mpg overall average out of the Ford's twin turbo 3.5 in an Expedition Max.
@@mountainhobo drive my 2016 Ford Expedition 3.5 L tw turbo work week 2 way trip from Milpitas To Turlock CA that 89 miles each way. I get 18.7 MPG that’s driving Highway miles. Not sure on how I would ever get to 26 miles in the ford?
@@samiaziz2665 Highway? I know that route. You are likely going through some traffic and over the Altamont Pass. I would not consider it easy highway miles, and it also depends on how heavy your foot is on the uphill. Still, if you think that Chevy will get you much better mileage, try it, or wait for Alex' full test.
I bought a 2022 Chev ltz in August & put 6,000 miles on it. It was the worst truck I have ever owned. The ride was like riding in a kids western flyer wagon. I sold it after 2 months. It was the best 8,000 dollar loss that I have ever had. I was so glad to see it go away. Thank goodness that I was able to find a ford.
I wish the 2022 silverado wasn't 50 grand, this would be my top pick of trucks. And I haven't wanted to buy a new chevy truck since the 90s but the refreshed 2022s are frickin sweet.
On any pickup-truck review I withhold my "Like" if you don't mention or show the payload figure for the truck you're reviewing. Please show/mention it - its one of the biggest decision points for me when choosing a truck!
@@KevinSmith-qi5yn I am not brand loyal. I find RAM started the nice interiors in 2019. Ford F150 founded in 2021. Now GM. Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra are also nice now. Credit to RAM for pushing the others.
Agreed. Most competitors in this segment have at least a N/A V6 or a turbocharged V6 somewhere in the lineup (Toyota makes their TT V6 standard in the tundra). GM should leave turbocharged 4 cylinder engines for their mid sized trucks.
@@damilolaakanni Toyota V6 TT competes both in power and price with the 6.2L V8. This four cylinder is more powerful than any past NA V6 options offered in the past. It's about as powerful as the Ford 2.7 V6. Why are you complaining that it's a four cylinder when clearly it smokes any NA V6 and even has more power and torque than some older V8.
Can one even get one of these trucks right now? Given supply chain issues, what is the lead time and are any options being temporarily deleted? I like the refresh front.
GM should've changed the engine option code if they were going to change out all the internals. Keep this in mind when getting parts in the future for you people that will think all 2.7L engines are the same. They are not.
@@AAutoBuyersGuide they completely discontinued the V6, they stopped production of it and now the only base engine in the fleet trim is the 2.7. Actually in the new 2 door 6.5 foot bed option the 2.7 is the ONLY engine offered. Also the 5.3V8 is now only the one with DFM even in the base model. They discontinued both AFM engines. This is also why they discontinued the 6 speed and now pair the V8 in the fleet model with the 10 speed. For 2023 we will also see a 10 speed for the gas engine in the HD trucks. Whether the 10 speed will be an optional upgrade or the only trans for the gas engine is not known yet though, as fleets may prefer the older 6 speed for now
@@imnotusingmyrealname4566 AFM is only an issue when you think you know better than the engineers and use other oils than the ones specified. Millions of trucks with AFM are on the road just fine. The 2.7T still has AFM, and now the new V8's have DFM, which is a far more complex system anyways.
@@james2042 Hmm. Yes with this and many other things it's just a vocal minority painting a bad picture. Thanks for the reassurance though. You seem to know your stuff regarding GM trucks so I'll believe you. I'm currently looking at the 5.3L V8 or the 3.0L Diesel. The 5.3L because it's a V8. That engine configuration is just legendary and they are only getting fewer and also the higher peak power. The 6.2L apparently has significantly worse fuel economy than the 5.3L and it also says you should use premium gasoline. I thought modern engines can handle lower octane gas well and would just make less power and consume a bit more fuel but according to comments on the internet (best source, amirite) it makes unusual sounds and is noticably weaker on regular gas. The Diesel because of range, fuel economy and torque. According to EPA numbers you save quite a bit on fuel with the diesel even though diesel is more expensive but maybe maintenance and repairs are more expensive than the V8 so it might make the lead narrower. Do you know anything about the octane thing and the actual fuel economy you'd expect from these engine and maybe the diesel costs too? Edit: Also there's the chip shortage and the fuel economy impacts of it. There are a shit ton of Silverados and their engines on the EPA website. How am I supposed to know what is what?
@@anthonyclay6059 100% agree. That transmission has been nothing but trouble, but GM refuses to give it up. I don't understand why, especially since the new Colorado and Canyon are expected to come out with that 2.7 and the 10 speed. The 10 speed has had its teething issues, but many of those have been sorted out by now. The 8 speed is just not adequate when you have a 10 speed at your disposal.
Have to admit, they should just put the work truck front grill on all models. It looks better IMO, could be a flow chevrolet grill by hollowing it out. The chintzy gold bow-tie is tacky. Also it's expected the new Colorado is to get the 10 speed auto. Why are they still running the 8 speed in the Silverado?
Some versions get the 10-speed I believe. Ik previous model years had the option of the 8 and 10 speed on certain engine configurations. I believe the 10-speed costed a bit more. Not sure abt the new model year
Ain’t RAM still using switchgear from 2009 in their trucks? Ford interiors ain’t never lead the pack in regards to design either. Don’t get me started on Nissan and Toyota’s interiors. GM is laughing! Lmdao 😂
Not being rude, but the 2.7 should belong in the Colorado, not in the Silverado. I'm glad Chevy has updated their interior. (I've been waiting for a good interior from GM for ages).
Not at all. The 5.3 feels like a dog in high elevation. The turbo four literally feels and maybe actually is more powerful in places like, well the state of Colorado.
@@damilolaakanni Why? Clearly it's powerful enough. It's more powerful than Chevys own older V8s. It's about as powerful as Ford's 2.7 V6 TT. If you ever drove any of those cars you realize than have more than enough power to tow boats and do typical daily truck stuff.
If it's designed well, I might actually prefer this 2.7 to Fords just being a simple inline configuration and single turbo. Should be super easy to access things in the event you need to, and seems to perform well for the segment.
@@gosman949 Well, he's just wrong. There's nothing about a turbo that necessarily requires any particular octane. All modern engines are detecting detonation and making fine adjustments to fuel delivery.
Alex, thank you for the great review as always. My question is why get a pickup truck over a van, say a RAM 3500, albeit, it has no AWD, but similarly for Ford Transit which does have AWD option. But the question is what can a pickup do that a van of say 2500/3500 cannot do, other than over the bed drop of certain cargo? I am just wondering why a pickup is so popular, since I spoke with two owners of pickups of Ford and Chevy, but they both prefer their Chevy cargo van.
Towing, proper 4WD for offroad, bigger payload, tons of aftermarket options for those wanting to customize their ride, the list goes on ... People shopping for a pickup truck know what they want that a van does not offer and I'd say that at least more than half of truck buyers use their trucks for their intended purpose whether, its offroad, towing, etc... A van has tons of limitations outside the whole vanlife and cargo work utility.
@@BiggyMak let's face it. Most people buy trucks now for style, room for the kids, and luxury. They. Ould get that all in an sun but they want to look more rugged
@@AAutoBuyersGuide How well they keep vehicle in lane on highway, if the ACC comes to a complete stop in traffic & resumes, etc. It's good to see who does it the best, not just the hands free systems.
What are you talking about? Your Silverado is rated at 13 city and 16 highway per epa. This four cylinder is more powerful than your V8 and gets better economy with a significantly larger and heavier truck.
Was the 5.3 available in 99? I thought the C/K was only available with the older 5.7. My '99 F-150 SCab 2wd w/ 5.4 was able to get 21mpg highway (I think I had a tune for it). But city mileage was pretty par for the course at like 14-15. And lets not forget that this new engine not only moves a larger/heavier vehicle, but makes like 50hp and 100lb/ft more than comparable trucks from 20 years ago while getting (arguably) better overall fuel economy.
Fun fact: If you want your google assistant to be a cool travel bro, say "Change voice to male". You end up with a deep bro-like voice that assists you.
Really wish any/all reviewers would tell you where it makes the torque. In a truck 400ftlbs is great at 1500rpm but worthless at 5k rpm.. generally these turbo 4s don't make the torque in the right spot.
Dear followers!! Don't let the beautiful pictures confuse you . Anyone who buys a new car from GENERAL Motors the chance you threw your money into the trash is very large. In this company there is no customer service, the company's management does not care at all, if you have a problem or a malfunction, you can only pray to God there is a chance that the help will come faster. GM is a very dangerous company, be careful and keep your money safe.!!!Share so more people don't get screwed.GM is a big bluf
Can the Super Cruise be fooled by a pair of googly eyes glasses? What's the use of hands-free driving, if you have to just sit there and look straight ahead? Especially if a driver safety system with adaptive cruise control is in place? I suspect the government screwed up something really good here.
The 5.3 liter V8 has more cylinders and less torque. I’d buy the 2.7 for the torque number, not the cylinder count. GM has invested a ton of money in improving the 2.7 engine and has made it the base engine in several Cadillac models.
@@sturat18 the 4cyl has a turbo its not just a 4cyl.. the 5.3 N/A infact is and will be more reliable. i had a 5.3 tuned with intake and it pulled pretty good
I wish they didn’t push the garbage 4 cylinder so hard like it gets the same if not less gas mileage than the 5.3 it’s absolutely useless. And Chevy killed the 5.3 with the cylinder deactivation. They had it in the Cadillacs 20 years ago and they were garbage then. They knew it was garbage in the first place so why continue to ruin a reliable v8. I ripped the afm out of my Silverado and got the same gas mileage. 16 city/22 highway. Absolutely useless
What kind of gotcha maintenance blunder does this truck have? It's a Chevy so it's gotta have some kind of ridiculous design decision like the Diesel where you have to drop the transmission to change a drive belt at 200,000 miles. Looking forward to Ram's Hurricane engines and whether they too will have some kind of issue. While the 8-speed may be a let down, I'm hopeful that the garbage pre-refresh interior was the only snafu of this truck.
![F.HERO Ft. JSPKK x ลำไย ไหทองคำ x M-PEE - ไม่สนิทบิดหมด (Thai Riders Anthem) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kPJZ0UihBfk/mqdefault.jpg)
This is by far the best detailed video on TH-cam, highlighting the exterior and interior of the LT trim. …..👏🏽
Just wish this 2.7 was offered with the 10-speed. I'm sure the 8 is okay, but a bit weary given some other owners experiences with that transmission. The 10 isnt perfect either, but I think the superior transmission overall.
@Michael H well they playing the planned obsolescence playbook of all auto companies these days, even Toyota and Honda don’t make quality long lasting cars anymore
@@williamerazo3921 Toyota doesn't make long lasting cars anymore? What metrics do you measure that by? They're extremely conservative in changes and testing new powertrains. Their hybrid ECVTs for example in Rav4/Hylander/Sienna/Prius (for example) are based on same ones made 20 years ago and just been refined each generation. All those also come with naturally aspirated engines and the ECVTs are less complex and higher reliability then auto transmissions. New turbo engines like in Tundra have no history to show relability. Will have to wait 3+ years.
I'd be more concerned towing 9000lbs with a 2.4L turbo putting out over 400lbs torque. Doesn't sound like a recipe for longevity...
@@James-il3tq why tow with 2.1 liter. You would be idiot to do so
@Michael H Both the 8 and 10 speeds are serviceable. They have 2 methods of filling them with fluid (the plug where the dipstick used to be or the dealer pan plug fill method) and the fluid level can be checked via the level check plug in the pan. They just aren't as DIY friendly, but they can be serviced.
Personally, I love that digital instrument cluster, and I think overall Iike it better than the Tundra. My preference is the classic rounded, which is really sharp. Generally, seems like a hugely improved interior, which I think GM realized it needed badly.
Great to see someone looking at the 4 banger with some seriousness. Did you know that they’re bringing back the sawed off Chevy this year with that engine only? Would be cool to see someone review the single cab with 6’ bed as the shortest half ton on the market.
Just bought one son
Thanks for this really good review. Can hardly wait for your more detailed review of the LT especially with the 2.7 High Output (GM speak). If I had the money, my purchase would be the LT package. I always thought the those extra tier packages (RST, High Country, LTZ, etc.) is nothing more than extra fluff over the LT package.
Great review.
These companies aren't making these little engines to piss people off. It costs enormous amounts of money and time to develop them.
They are under tremendous pressure to go with smaller engines and to heavily invest in EV.
I predict that within 20 years you won't be able to buy a new V8. I hope I'm wrong.
I love my 6.2 but these little turbos are the future whether we like it or not. It wasn't that long ago that full size V8 sedans were everywhere. Now they are gone forever.
Just purchased this truck. I’m enjoying it so far
Appreciate the honesty of how you felt about the pre-refresh design as I fully agree with you. Still not a fan of the exterior or interior design on this refresh although I will recognize the interior is an improvement over the absolutely dreadful pre-refresh interior. I would say the interior is on par with the F150 which is progress for Chevy. I would still get a Ram as I think it's a much nicer offering although I do appreciate Chevy's many engine options.
Just bought a Ram with the Hemi. No thrashing turbos. Eat out 5 times a month instead of 10 and the gas bill is a wash.
@@Ryan2022 That's the right mentality. 😂
@@Ryan2022 That's why I really like GM actually. They have TWO V8 engines available, the 5.3L being the most efficient gas engine in the lineup actually! 😝 (Please, please, ignore the 4-cylinder.) The diesel is also the best in the half-ton segment with the exhaust brake and the inline-6 cylinder arrangement.
@@Ryan2022 You know what's funny? The 2.7L Turbo doesn't even get good mileage. Here are the Car and Driver highway MPG numbers:
2.7L I4 Turbo: 18 MPG
6.2L V8: 19 MPG
5.3L V8: 21 MPG
3.0L I6 Turbodiesel: 26 MPG
Just bought Chevy LT 2.7 2022 It gets up and goes. Expensive. Wow. I love the truck.
Yup where i live cooled seats and window tint is a must. I know you guys talk about letting alot of light in but not good where i live
26mpg is great on the highway for a truck! Especially with that power, it's exciting to see more efficient options.
Main concern would be reliability and longevity of engine under that much stress.
Agree, think the reclaimed barn wood look is attractive in the new Chevy truck.
Never been a fan of Chevy trucks, but you made me kind of wanna like this one lol. Fantastic presentation, and you got it out fast while still easy to listen to so the video isn't 1 hour+.
My eyes say Silverado but my wallet allows for a Ford Maverick. Let’s hope the chain supply issues are soon resolved.
If you don't need a full size truck then the maverick I'll be just fine and save you some money. If you need a full size truck then it doesn't matter how much money you save, you won't be happy. If you need a full size then you could buy a used full size for the price of a new maverick. Just saying.
If you're waiting for prices to go down they won't on new autos. You'd need deflation for prices to go down (central banks won't allow deflation, claim to target 2% when we're currently at 8.5% as reported by fake government numbers. Real inflation around 17% year over year). Used autos might go down a tad with gigantic price jumps last couple years but even then unlikely with massive money printing by central banks last 2 years led by US (40% of all US dollars printed ever done in last 2 years).
@@James-il3tq
It’s all fiat currency.
They want everyone to have EVs now. If you want gas engines anymore it will cost you am arm and leg
Mpg on this 4 cyl is surprisingly unimpressive. In my recent trip across the country, I got 20 mpg overall average out of the Ford's twin turbo 3.5 in an Expedition Max.
Alex said he got 26mpg from his trip that’s 6 mile more then the ford
@@samiaziz2665 Alex said highway only, ideal conditions. I am talking across the country, through major cities, etc., combined mpg.
@@mountainhobo drive my 2016 Ford Expedition 3.5 L tw turbo work week 2 way trip from Milpitas To Turlock CA that 89 miles each way. I get 18.7 MPG that’s driving Highway miles.
Not sure on how I would ever get to 26 miles in the ford?
@@samiaziz2665 Highway? I know that route. You are likely going through some traffic and over the Altamont Pass. I would not consider it easy highway miles, and it also depends on how heavy your foot is on the uphill. Still, if you think that Chevy will get you much better mileage, try it, or wait for Alex' full test.
I get 22mpg at 75mph in my 5.0 v8 F150 fx4 4x4. It's clean and well maintained.
I bought a 2022 Chev ltz in August & put 6,000 miles on it. It was the worst truck I have ever owned. The ride was like riding in a kids western flyer wagon. I sold it after 2 months. It was the best 8,000 dollar loss that I have ever had. I was so glad to see it go away. Thank goodness that I was able to find a ford.
Competition is alive and well in the pickup truck arena, well done Chevy.
Doesn't matter too much. Ford, GM, and Ram will still sell every single half ton they make.
The song choice for this infotainment review was savage
Want this engine as a diesel with 35+ MPG in a midsize SUV
I wish the 2022 silverado wasn't 50 grand, this would be my top pick of trucks. And I haven't wanted to buy a new chevy truck since the 90s but the refreshed 2022s are frickin sweet.
Never was a fan of the latest Chevrolets but this truck is very nice
Ford Maverick hybrid please. I'd love a diesel Silverado, but I just can't afford another mortgage payment. Beautiful desert 🏜 scenery 😍
On any pickup-truck review I withhold my "Like" if you don't mention or show the payload figure for the truck you're reviewing. Please show/mention it - its one of the biggest decision points for me when choosing a truck!
Alex, At 104 degrees we give you permission to wear a hat. 😉
And shorts
@@James-il3tq lmaooooo
Thanks for being upfront about how you hated the last one. Now that the new one is out.
Eliminating availability of a bench seat option was as dumb as the trend of firming suspensions in everything to give a "sporty" feel.
A turbo four with cylinder deactivation? Crazy.
Extended warranty or lease would be highly advisable.
It's definitely and improvement all around, but I sill can't get past those circular wheel wells.
Wasn't expecting to like a Chevy truck. These seem interesting with that peppy 4 cylinder engine. Well done review
dont get the 4 cylinder.. get the 3.0 duramax or 6.2 .. the 5.3 is a good motor also
4 cylinder turbo Chevy putting out over 400lbs torque and towing 9000lbs = very short lifespan on that engine.
@@James-il3tq looks like new technology is outdating you old heads
@@robertsolorzano1486 turbos have been around along time wouldn't call it new technology id take a N/A v8 all day for reliability
@@Louthemailman Thing is a tank. Both good engines. Your money your choice.
The prerefresh interior was dated from the start, Ford and especially RAM had much better interiors. GM should’ve started with this interior.
Exactly my feelings.
PreRefresh interior Chevy: Here is our top trim.
Ram: Here is our 2nd from the bottom trim.
Ram's Interior still wins.
@@KevinSmith-qi5yn I am not brand loyal. I find RAM started the nice interiors in 2019. Ford F150 founded in 2021. Now GM. Nissan Titan and Toyota Tundra are also nice now. Credit to RAM for pushing the others.
That 2.7 belongs in the Colorado
2.7 will feel more powerful in high elevations than the 5.3.
Agreed. Most competitors in this segment have at least a N/A V6 or a turbocharged V6 somewhere in the lineup (Toyota makes their TT V6 standard in the tundra). GM should leave turbocharged 4 cylinder engines for their mid sized trucks.
@@damilolaakanni
Toyota V6 TT competes both in power and price with the 6.2L V8. This four cylinder is more powerful than any past NA V6 options offered in the past. It's about as powerful as the Ford 2.7 V6. Why are you complaining that it's a four cylinder when clearly it smokes any NA V6 and even has more power and torque than some older V8.
That's going to be my new band's name......Carpeted Hump.
Bench seat in the middle.. umm YES!!!!
Can one even get one of these trucks right now? Given supply chain issues, what is the lead time and are any options being temporarily deleted? I like the refresh front.
There are 15,000 nationwide right now. Check out the inventory page at Chevrolet.
@@Ultratron100 looks like the majority are “In Transit”. So, my question still,stands. I am sure they will get delivered someday.
When I see "Fixed" on the cover photo, first thing came to my mind is "GM neutered the Silverado". LOL
GM should've changed the engine option code if they were going to change out all the internals. Keep this in mind when getting parts in the future for you people that will think all 2.7L engines are the same. They are not.
The mountains in the background though... 🥰😍😍
The advanced cruise control is honestly pretty sick.
sick in a bad way? Depending on your age, sick means different things. At my age, sick means, " it sucks"!
@@gosman949 In a good way!
Nice truck. Has anyone actually seen one on a dealer’s lot?
The 2.7 is the only engine in all body styles. The rest are limited based on trim or body
You can still buy the base V6 if you are a fleet customer
@@AAutoBuyersGuide they completely discontinued the V6, they stopped production of it and now the only base engine in the fleet trim is the 2.7. Actually in the new 2 door 6.5 foot bed option the 2.7 is the ONLY engine offered.
Also the 5.3V8 is now only the one with DFM even in the base model. They discontinued both AFM engines. This is also why they discontinued the 6 speed and now pair the V8 in the fleet model with the 10 speed.
For 2023 we will also see a 10 speed for the gas engine in the HD trucks. Whether the 10 speed will be an optional upgrade or the only trans for the gas engine is not known yet though, as fleets may prefer the older 6 speed for now
@@james2042 Great that they ditched AFM. That was apparently quite bad.
@@imnotusingmyrealname4566 AFM is only an issue when you think you know better than the engineers and use other oils than the ones specified. Millions of trucks with AFM are on the road just fine. The 2.7T still has AFM, and now the new V8's have DFM, which is a far more complex system anyways.
@@james2042 Hmm. Yes with this and many other things it's just a vocal minority painting a bad picture. Thanks for the reassurance though. You seem to know your stuff regarding GM trucks so I'll believe you.
I'm currently looking at the 5.3L V8 or the 3.0L Diesel. The 5.3L because it's a V8. That engine configuration is just legendary and they are only getting fewer and also the higher peak power. The 6.2L apparently has significantly worse fuel economy than the 5.3L and it also says you should use premium gasoline. I thought modern engines can handle lower octane gas well and would just make less power and consume a bit more fuel but according to comments on the internet (best source, amirite) it makes unusual sounds and is noticably weaker on regular gas.
The Diesel because of range, fuel economy and torque. According to EPA numbers you save quite a bit on fuel with the diesel even though diesel is more expensive but maybe maintenance and repairs are more expensive than the V8 so it might make the lead narrower.
Do you know anything about the octane thing and the actual fuel economy you'd expect from these engine and maybe the diesel costs too?
Edit: Also there's the chip shortage and the fuel economy impacts of it. There are a shit ton of Silverados and their engines on the EPA website. How am I supposed to know what is what?
Does it requires premium gas to get the 430lbs ft of torque?
Because i know the older 2.7 was built to run on 87 octane.
RAM is only option dashboard with needles now. I will miss longhorn dashboard if they replace with digital one.
If GM would put the 10 speed behind that 2.7, then maybe I would be interested in GM trucks.
My 22 Silverado is waiting on a new trans! problem started at 1k! 8spd sucks!!
@@anthonyclay6059 100% agree. That transmission has been nothing but trouble, but GM refuses to give it up. I don't understand why, especially since the new Colorado and Canyon are expected to come out with that 2.7 and the 10 speed. The 10 speed has had its teething issues, but many of those have been sorted out by now. The 8 speed is just not adequate when you have a 10 speed at your disposal.
@@anthonyclay6059 Also, I'm sorry you're having troubles with your truck. That definitely is not a good time.
@@anthonyclay6059 thats actually a known fact the 8spd is trash.
2.7 ...get the 3.0 duramax
Ditch those tacky "High Country" badges on the door cards, Chevrolet. Let the improved material quality do the bragging!!
Exactly
Finally a nice interior in a domestic truck!
? Ram has an awesome interior
When is the 3 cylinder power plant being introduced? 😂
Just wait there will be a pick up truck thumper in the future.
Please don’t encourage GM. I’m sure the bean counters would be thrilled with that idea.
The 0 cylinder version is coming next year.
@@directorjustin I’d be very interested in buying a new truck without a motor. Bring your own motor.
@@bobbbobb4663
Electric Silverado
Been eagerly awaiting this one Alex
The LT with the 3.0 Duramax might just make me consider Chevy.
Have to admit, they should just put the work truck front grill on all models. It looks better IMO, could be a flow chevrolet grill by hollowing it out. The chintzy gold bow-tie is tacky.
Also it's expected the new Colorado is to get the 10 speed auto. Why are they still running the 8 speed in the Silverado?
Some versions get the 10-speed I believe. Ik previous model years had the option of the 8 and 10 speed on certain engine configurations. I believe the 10-speed costed a bit more. Not sure abt the new model year
@@ayushmalpeddi2793
They must not have updated the order guide yet. Because they all still say 8 spd.
Very thorough review. Thanks!
This was great! Super Cruise is pretty cool.
Is there a follow up for the official ratings
Great review as always Alex.
GOOD GOD! 203 degrees on the tranny. My 3.0 durmax, the hottest i've ever seen it was 182 degrees and that's pulling a 7,500 lbs car trailer.
Finally a decent interior in a GM. It only took 40 years 😕
Hence the CeCe Peniston song on the infotainment screen.
Ain’t RAM still using switchgear from 2009 in their trucks? Ford interiors ain’t never lead the pack in regards to design either. Don’t get me started on Nissan and Toyota’s interiors. GM is laughing! Lmdao 😂
I always thought the interior refresh in 1995 was the best looking of the big three at the time. But yeah that was almost 3 decades ago lol
When a turbo 4 has more tq than the 6.4 hemi in the power wagon🤦🏿♂️
Not being rude, but the 2.7 should belong in the Colorado, not in the Silverado. I'm glad Chevy has updated their interior. (I've been waiting for a good interior from GM for ages).
It will be in the Colorado soon.
Not at all. The 5.3 feels like a dog in high elevation. The turbo four literally feels and maybe actually is more powerful in places like, well the state of Colorado.
@@kamilb8232 IMO, they should have turbocharged the 3.6 V6 instead of the 2.7. And make that engine standard.
@@damilolaakanni
Why? Clearly it's powerful enough. It's more powerful than Chevys own older V8s. It's about as powerful as Ford's 2.7 V6 TT. If you ever drove any of those cars you realize than have more than enough power to tow boats and do typical daily truck stuff.
If it's designed well, I might actually prefer this 2.7 to Fords just being a simple inline configuration and single turbo. Should be super easy to access things in the event you need to, and seems to perform well for the segment.
I like the Hemi
Great song choice
Alex is a die-hard Burger King man I see…
It still has cylinder de activation on four cylinder
The gas mileage of this 2.7 I4 is even worse than the 2.7 V6 on F150?
Until they replace that antique rear leaf spring suspension, it is a no way i would buy it. Tundra and Ram have modern coil designs.
It's not that big a deal. Ford also still uses leafs.
I appreciate the simplicity of leaf springs in a full size truck, given what they are typically designed to do.
RAMs also have a lot of trouble with that suspension, especially under load.
Nice review.
6:48 Oh my god, Alex went full limey bloke on us. #sikth
The turbo will require premium fuel, correct? So that needs to be factored in?
Hyundai and Kia use turbos that run on regular. And, with much better, longer warranties.
It's regular unleaded 87 octane.
@@kamilb8232 most excellent!
@@jrs9264 I don't know about that. Redline boy says all turbos need premium fuel!
@@gosman949 Well, he's just wrong. There's nothing about a turbo that necessarily requires any particular octane. All modern engines are detecting detonation and making fine adjustments to fuel delivery.
Does GM allow for 6 seats and rear HVAC? Ford gives you either a front bench or rear vents but not both.
Yes! my custom is setup like this
Alex, thank you for the great review as always. My question is why get a pickup truck over a van, say a RAM 3500, albeit, it has no AWD, but similarly for Ford Transit which does have AWD option. But the question is what can a pickup do that a van of say 2500/3500 cannot do, other than over the bed drop of certain cargo? I am just wondering why a pickup is so popular, since I spoke with two owners of pickups of Ford and Chevy, but they both prefer their Chevy cargo van.
Towing, proper 4WD for offroad, bigger payload, tons of aftermarket options for those wanting to customize their ride, the list goes on ... People shopping for a pickup truck know what they want that a van does not offer and I'd say that at least more than half of truck buyers use their trucks for their intended purpose whether, its offroad, towing, etc... A van has tons of limitations outside the whole vanlife and cargo work utility.
@@BiggyMak let's face it. Most people buy trucks now for style, room for the kids, and luxury. They. Ould get that all in an sun but they want to look more rugged
Here in America our politicians produce mountains of bullshit and frankly, that's just better hauled in a pickup than a van
Excellent video thank you!
Better late than never, I guess. Ford and RAM have been at this level for how many years now?
104? Sounds like home.
The only way Chevy could fix the Silverado would be to have Toyota manufacture it.
Toyota's Tundra has been having issues. It's no secret that GM Trucks are more reliable.
toyota?😂
The old front end looked better.
Why don’t you test all vehicles lane centering systems?
What do you propose?
@@AAutoBuyersGuide How well they keep vehicle in lane on highway, if the ACC comes to a complete stop in traffic & resumes, etc. It's good to see who does it the best, not just the hands free systems.
Ok you gonna have to do a little video on the android auto and the other. i didnt know that
Looks to be about the same mileage as my 1999 Silverado 5.3L V8 4 spd auto
What are you talking about? Your Silverado is rated at 13 city and 16 highway per epa. This four cylinder is more powerful than your V8 and gets better economy with a significantly larger and heavier truck.
Was the 5.3 available in 99? I thought the C/K was only available with the older 5.7.
My '99 F-150 SCab 2wd w/ 5.4 was able to get 21mpg highway (I think I had a tune for it). But city mileage was pretty par for the course at like 14-15.
And lets not forget that this new engine not only moves a larger/heavier vehicle, but makes like 50hp and 100lb/ft more than comparable trucks from 20 years ago while getting (arguably) better overall fuel economy.
you get 26mpg on the highway in your 1999 5.3 Silverado?
@@kamilb8232 Specs are one thing, but real life is another.
@@fredtalmadge5307 Sure. Either way I doubt your Silverado can beat the efficiency of this new engine under the same conditions.
Fun fact:
If you want your google assistant to be a cool travel bro, say "Change voice to male". You end up with a deep bro-like voice that assists you.
Has GM ever built a super-reliable turbo engine of any kind?
Title is false!! At least until Silverado EV comes out 😁
Hi Alex, not sure if it is the updated styling but did they shrink the truck? It looks smaller than the previous version.
CeCe Peniston !!!! Yes ma'am
Really wish any/all reviewers would tell you where it makes the torque. In a truck 400ftlbs is great at 1500rpm but worthless at 5k rpm.. generally these turbo 4s don't make the torque in the right spot.
10 X better than the predecessor
I want to drive my truck or car not let it drive me
pickup trucks are getting very seriouse
Too bad there is no voltech phev and standard hybrid
Dear
followers!! Don't let the beautiful pictures confuse you . Anyone who
buys a new car from GENERAL Motors the chance you threw your money into
the trash is very large. In this company there is no customer service,
the company's management does not care at all, if you have a problem or a
malfunction, you can only pray to God there is a chance that the help
will come faster. GM is a very dangerous company, be careful and keep
your money safe.!!!Share so more people don't get screwed.GM is a big bluf
1:47 Not on the Toyota Tundra!
Can the Super Cruise be fooled by a pair of googly eyes glasses? What's the use of hands-free driving, if you have to just sit there and look straight ahead? Especially if a driver safety system with adaptive cruise control is in place? I suspect the government screwed up something really good here.
This isn't prettier or uglier than the other trucks. It looks fine to me.
No way I could accept a 4cyl in a full size truck.
The 5.3L gives less torque than the 4 cyl. Food for thought is all.
Then get one of the V-8s. They won't do any better of a job, but if all you care about is cylinder count, they give you choices.
Cavemen we're scared of fire too.
The 5.3 liter V8 has more cylinders and less torque. I’d buy the 2.7 for the torque number, not the cylinder count. GM has invested a ton of money in improving the 2.7 engine and has made it the base engine in several Cadillac models.
@@sturat18 the 4cyl has a turbo its not just a 4cyl.. the 5.3 N/A infact is and will be more reliable. i had a 5.3 tuned with intake and it pulled pretty good
My ? Who designed the transmission? I know ford and gm work together on that.
The 8L90 is a GM design.
plz get rid of that shark fin
I wish they didn’t push the garbage 4 cylinder so hard like it gets the same if not less gas mileage than the 5.3 it’s absolutely useless. And Chevy killed the 5.3 with the cylinder deactivation. They had it in the Cadillacs 20 years ago and they were garbage then. They knew it was garbage in the first place so why continue to ruin a reliable v8. I ripped the afm out of my Silverado and got the same gas mileage. 16 city/22 highway. Absolutely useless
GM pickups outsold Ford and RAM in 2020, 2021 and Q1 2022, with the "ugly" interior. Leather isn't everything...
What kind of gotcha maintenance blunder does this truck have? It's a Chevy so it's gotta have some kind of ridiculous design decision like the Diesel where you have to drop the transmission to change a drive belt at 200,000 miles. Looking forward to Ram's Hurricane engines and whether they too will have some kind of issue. While the 8-speed may be a let down, I'm hopeful that the garbage pre-refresh interior was the only snafu of this truck.
Unless you want an "American" brand, the new Toyota Tundra is way more competitive.
Exhaust sound! Nobody wants their truck to sound like a 4 cylinder fart machine. Inline 6's, however, sound as good as a BIT.
V8 gas mileage on a 4 banger. Pathetic. It’s just as bad as the terrible car play on every single split screen
4cyl truck........... no thx