What are your thoughts on AI generated music? 🟡 Become your Own Record Label: www.topmusicattorney.com/becomeyourownrecordlabel 🟢 Free Split Sheet Template: www.topmusicattorney.com/splitsheet 📄 Music Contracts Templates: www.topmusicattorney.com/music-contracts 📺 Get Your Music Into Tv/Film/Games: www.topmusicattorney.com/sync 💻 #1 Resource For Artists And Producers: www.topmusicattorney.com ⚖ Hire An Attorney: www.delgadoentertainmentlaw.com 📰 Get My Newsletter: www.topmusicattorney.com/newsletter/
From the information I get from your show, the problem is in identifying what is AI and embedded, licensed beats and/or samples. The only thing I think can stop some issues is to embed a code in all AI generated showing what part is AI. Beats and Samples sold also need a unique ID, so people can't create a problem using Content ID.
But this is from their official FAQ: A Basic plan allows you to create songs for non-commercial use, while songs created with Pro and Premier plans include commercial use. Here's an easy way to break down the two categories: Commercial Use Distribution: Putting your music on Spotify, Apple Music, etc. TH-cam Content: Adding your songs to content on your monetizing channel Direct Sales: Selling your songs, direct to consumers Sync licensing: Getting your songs placed in tv, film, or video games
Yes, there is such quality that even for musicians it is simply disgusting! But to throw in your melody and see what the AI does with it, this can help you hear the future track from a different perspective and perhaps influence the final idea in the future :)
8:20 The ownership with a paid subscription is the reason I chose Suno. I'm not trying to monetize the dozens of AI-assisted music pieces I generated, however, it is nice to know I can, should I get good enough to sell something, one day.
You own YOUR contribution, and according to GPT3.5 you can take ownership if you make a significant contribution to what the AI generated. So if all you did was use the prompts in the Need Ideas section of Suno, it might not qualify. If you write a micro-story, like I do at times, and the AI assists you in creating a song, you can take ownership of that. You can only copyright YOUR contribution, not what the AI generated.
I'm using suno to help me with vocals. I chose suno because of the ownership of the content made with them. And pretty happy with the results. I relesae 11 commertial songs in a priod of the last 2 months. The vocals are good enough (after huge process) to be released commertialy in a music labels. Sorry for my english mistakes 😅
what if i create an instrumental using paid tier. then use that in a short film on youtube. then my subscription expires. my channel is monetized. does it thus become a problem or do i retain all rights to use it in the shortfilm since i created it with a paid subscription
Good information. I am one of the paid tier users of Suno and I have recently started submitting the songs I make through a distributor as well that gets it on all or most music platforms (apple music, spotify, pandora, youtube music, etc.) I also make my lyrics outside of Suno as well so that Suno doesn't generate those as well. I have heard some people do songs with Suno that also uses its generation of them, and to be honest, isn't that good. I know there is also so much more I need to learn about marketing my music as well. Honestly I'm not worried about making any money from it, I only started to make music to help grow my TH-cam channel as I try and get myself to a point I can start adding other types of content as well. I know one of the things I was worried about with the music I make, if some big record label ends up hearing it and liking it, and wanting to buy it or whatever, I don't know how to approach that since the music portion and the vocals are AI currently. I do plan on trying to make my own music using the software available to actually make your own by manually selecting everything. I don't really see a record label coming to me about any of my music, but if one does, I will have to try and find a local lawyer that deals with this type of stuff and have them help me through it so it doesn't come back to bite me.
If I have a paid account in suno and use the lyrics that I wrote but then turn around and take a melody I created in suno but reconstruct the song in Logic and get my own singer and try to copyright that song. Suno basically becomes the tool to help guide you to a good melody but the final result would have a few changes I did in Logic or protools
Love you and your valued information! Greatly appreciated my friend. Would love to see a video, going through the process of applying for copyright. I usually have the songs I am concerned about professionally drafted into sheet music. Thanks Again you are awesome sauce my friend!
I create AI music not for profit but to spread positivity and bring balance. I only went through a distributor to make my music available on Shazam.I use Suno because its terms align with my values. We have a unique chance to use music as a force for good, and that's my goal-whether my work is shared or not. Music can be a powerful tool to counter negativity, and I hope it reaches those who need it.
Loved this video even though I don't personally use any AI music service. My question is could you cover other AI stuff? For example, I do have a subscription currently to Anthropics's AI, and even though I am in the clear, I'd just be cool to see you go through some more of these less niche AI services to see what their terms are. Maybe even the terms for OpenAI as well, of course, it's up to you and I get the specialization. Yet a lot of people use other more mainstream AI services a lot more often, such as Claude, to OpenAI, to even Google’s AI, and it'd be cool to see you go through their terms. Even if you decide not to take up my suggestion, I still enjoyed the video and quality time and effort you pulled together for us, so thank you!
Locally run Ai is always going to be behind new releases from these companies, same reason I don’t understand why people use Linux, the amount of quality of life you lose for basic security is insane
@@JustRallax The more you have to lose the more value you place on security, autonomy, portability, predictability. You don't own your business if someone else can pull the plug.
Udio is definitely better in a lot of ways. Clearer outputs, i like the way it is set up and more editing is possible. But Suno does make more creative outputs and adheres to the prompts better. Especially when doing mashup genres and whatnot but I like both just because they allow us to "own" what we get as outputs and makes making music so much faster and easier. Thank you for explaining the terms. I hardly ever try to read them because they are so hard to understand most of the time so i just try to ask the developers or moderators at least before using something
But how can suno know if you are using a song you made on their platform? Say i make money ith a song made with suno. Then i transform it on a other music editing software. They can't do anything . Anyway, i deleted all the songs from suno after its done and saved Suno.
@@arijinal okay so it’s difficult to copyright 100% ai generated songs (obviously to protect real music artistry and its economic structure) but if you mix drums over the top or sing over it or do something original with it like write your own lyrics, heavy editing or audio engineering production on it then copyright is approved! These are called ai assisted songs and are allowed under creativity clauses, they cease being ai songs because you added a creative influence to it and you are human!
Very interesting video, but I have a question. If I generated a song with Suno (using lyrics I own) and, for specific reasons (such as tonal adjustments), I completely remake it with different sounds while keeping the structure, melody, and arrangement, and then have it sung by a singer I want to promote (essentially creating an entirely new recording), what happens?
Thanks for your work. It will be interesting how things change in the legal field due to these lawsuits. Glad you are here to help give us some updated news. God bless.
@@LuisRdzG10 No you own EVERYTHING you plug in to Suno including lyrics. That's if you're on a paid plan btw. But I don't think anyone would sensibly plug anything into Suno on a free plan!
To begin, I want to say that I love your videos, they are both informative and entertaining. I’d like to weigh in because I use Suno for all the songs on my channel, and I prefer it over Udio due to my musical taste. While Udio has better voice quality, its music often feels bland and uninspired to me. I actually find Suno’s terms of service to be quite fair. Since I’m using their AI, it seems reasonable that it gets trained on my input (lyrics, instruments, my voice, etc.). I frequently use the upload feature to create songs, and I don’t mind contributing to improve their AI. I also understand that, given the sheer volume of outputs, it’s possible for the AI to produce something that closely resembles or even matches one of my outputs. Therefor In the ongoing court case, I wouldn’t be surprised if they argue that training their AI on copyrighted music was necessary not to reproduce it, but to teach the AI what not to use due to copyright restrictions. By doing so, the AI also learns what it can use and how to structure songs. Essentially, they may claim they had no choice because, given the high volume of outputs, it would only be a matter of time before the AI unintentionally outputted copyrighted music. Most people creating AI songs aren’t doing it for money or fame, they just want to share their ideas and thoughts with the world. I know firsthand how much time can go into crafting just one AI song, even though many people won’t appreciate the effort simply because it involves AI. And that’s perfectly fine.
@@Corteliax totally agree that creating anything with AI assiatance takes a lot of work. most people think quality stuff pours out at the click of a button.
In SUNO, it is possible to remove the songs you generated. What is the implication of that, if I just remember the song and make it some other way once it is deleted?
One thing to take into account is that it may not be a self contained system, but may have or introduce subprocessors later. That’s one reason why they claim such broad rights. They don’t want a situation where the input is processed by a third party, which is solely there to augment their own process, and when someone finds out, they sue them because ”I didn’t give Acme inc permission to process my data, only you!”
Please learn to write music yourself. It's not that hard and the satisfaction is light years ahead of some computer program. Don't encourage these mofos.
Hi Krystle I hope your ok. I’ve not tried Suno properly yet but I’ve used it a bit to see if it did what I needed. I’m not a drummer but I’m after a Japanese huge wardrum simple track 7 minutes long how would I get that and is AI even capable of doing that?
Please. You know it is not black and white like that. Transferring copyrights in music with a single agreement, especially for future songs that haven’t been created, is problematic and unusual for several reasons. In copyright law, especially in the context of music, it’s crucial to be very specific when transferring rights. Agreements usually need to specify exactly which rights are being transferred, for which works, and for what duration. Copyright law is generally based on the principle that you should always specify the works involved when transferring rights. This specificity ensures clarity for both the creator and the party receiving the rights, helping to avoid disputes or misunderstandings about which works are covered. Such board agreements are legally complex and probably would not hold up in court if challenged.
I use Udio, I write all of my material and will be adding my own stems to it also more from me instead of it being solely a full Ai project. I don’t use Suno their voices sound too distinctive
Unless expressly authorized...like when you become a paying customer instead of using it for free. From the terms for commercial use and ownership "If you were subscribed with a Pro or Premier plan when the song was created, you are the owner of the song. You also retain the rights to commercial use for the song, even if you end your subscription. If you are using the free version of Suno (our Basic tier), we retain ownership of the songs you generate, but you are allowed to use those songs for non-commercial purposes, subject to your compliance with Suno’s Terms of Service."
Basically you can use it on your socials/anywhere BUT without getting any $$$ or any $$ involved. Its as simple as that. Tips/Donations you get from people/subs are fine.
Well, there is no copyrights in France, neither in many countries, then any copyriights consideration is of few interest. The point is that copyrights is very local to US. Regarding intellectual rights, Suno works rather well worldwide.
So, Suno has the right to license your content to be used in a movie soundtrack or tv? Sounds like Suno gets the right to use uploaded content however it wants. Is that your read?
I think it means that anything you use to generate AI content with the service can end up as part of the training data for the AI generation for everyone else forever.
@@MuscleMomAmongUs-i7n They do clearly say you can use all output for commercial purposes as long as you're on a paid plan. You can't if you're on FREE. It's pretty clear!
Please yes, make a video on how to register for copyright AI-assisted song, I can even be a guinea pig an assist in some sort of quid pro quo arranngement beneficial to us both! LMK! =)
Rule of thumb: If you upload *anything* to an online service, cloud etc. or use such a service to create anything, assume you are basically giving it to them. Always ask yourself, will you have the money to sue them.
Why does it seem like these TOS are similar to those used for games? Is it because at its inception, this was the most comprehensive protection for the providers to treat AI as something for users' entertainment purposes only, and not as a digital musical instrument/tool? We have many plugins and effects now that are laced with AI. Are we going to get to a place where if we use any of those, they will start claiming ownership and free use of anything we create while using them? 🤔
Some services states that you 'own' the output, but in some case I've seen terms that say that if you make any money from it, they will earn 50% of revenue generated if the music originated from their service!!! so how it that ownership?
Have you ever covered the ai App, Donna? I would be very curious what the legal rights are to that platform. I love the work you are doing on your channel btw.
@@StratsRUs Maybe as a website but it is app on iPhone and I assume they have it for Android. I have a subscription that I am going to cancel soon until I need it again. I used it to write a revenge rap for a guy who is a stalker and beats women, called Gary Scary. I wrote the lyrics. The subscription is like $9.98 a month or cheaper if you purchase for the year. There are different extras, too. Like separating the vocals and instrumentals for an extra charge and it's like $16.00 to download a certificate of ownership if you want to use it commercially. I would be curious if one even needs it. I would love to see it covered here to look at their agreement and small print because my friend uses it a lot more than I did. I only wrote 2 songs, Donna created the arrangement. I probably would write some podcast intros and other project related material if I knew downloading the certificate and filing for copyright would protect me. It does a pretty good job, but I have no idea where it got its training. It says with the subscription you can use any of your work commercially but I think the extra cost for the cert dl file gives us an extra layer of cred to offer up to any argument on copyright. How legal that holds up, that's not my area of expertise. Hope to see this channel cover it some day.
i used lalals(not lalala) but someone said i could only use vocals and that i couldn't use their instrumental(sounds weird to me since never saw on website where it stated this) but now i use a website called ai music although ai music is a suspicious website maybe i'll go to suno at some point
I created something on Suno but didn't publish it on Suno... and everything created on Suno (free tier) and not published will be removed after certain number of days. Now that it disappeared from my created list, how will Suno claim it was theirs? Just an honest question because I already posted the song on TH-cam. And what if I created a good song on Suno during free tier, published it, then subscribed (paid), do I have the right to the song?
What happens if the song was generated by AI, say an instrumental; however, you took that song, or parts of several songs which are all AI generated BUT sliced them together to make a new song: in other words, an Arrangement? Curious how that works and not sure if there's an answer? All of the music AI generated (no protected) but the arrangement, how the song progresses, was assembled by a human? Curious about your thoughts.
I think that falls into the category of "made partly with a.i." that she mentioned. Kinda same as using samples of human made songs; it's a new piece, but they are credited and get some share of the royalties. With Suno though, you're not allowed to monetize it at all if it was made with a free subscription, and with paid one you get all royalties.
Eso en mi país éso se conoce como "cláusulas abusivas". Y la mayoría de esas cláusulas violan derechos naturales. La mayoría de las plataformas digitales abusan de éso, ya que saben perfectamente que el usuario oprime los botones "aceptar" y "siguiente" sin leer nada. Pero como ley y justicia son dos cosas diferentes, es bueno ver (como dices tú) que en pocos meses muchas de esas plataformas desaparecen... Gracias por ocuparte..!
Their real business model is that TH-cam automatically pays out for copyright infringement. It wouldn't stand up in court as ai content can't be copyrighted.
I was aware of the terms that said using the paid service, you own the song, but the free one you don't. I wasn't aware that they are sooooo loose in everything else. It is like they are saying "Yo, it's all good bro...but also it's not, but kinda is...know what I mean?" I like what you said about copywrite of ai music as well. This was my interpretation. I have a lot of people that come by my channel and say that you can't do it. My position was that the case against it was for that specific piece of artwork but never said you could never copyright ai stuff. You just need to prove enough human interaction in order to satisfy whoever is going to stamp the approval. As far as the Sony v Suno / Udio lawsuit. I'm really curious if the recent win of Open ai against news agencies will impact this. They basically said "Yeah, I don't see a problem with ai learning from others works".
i once covered a famouse metal band's song, even quite remade it, and when i uploaded it on youtube i got a copyright claim. so the platform can analyze sequences of notes. even in other tonalities.
I only have one question regarding Suno and what you just explained here... Let's say someone is using Suno in order to create previews/prototypes of songs that they eventually want to produce in a studio (i.e. a legit song made by real people, recorded on site), would Suno be able to claim copyrights on that because of the similarities with the prototype created first through their service? It's not the first time I see people being inspired to record actual songs based on what they created with Suno (myself included), but would that even be possible? I somehow highly doubt that mentioning the song was originally created/prototyped using Suno would be enough for them, especially if it's a hit making a decent amount of money...
I just came from Venus Theory's video on how he stole his own music using AI and copyright law loopholes. I wonder how Suno being able to just claim a song a user made might potentially collide with someone stealing another person's music and maybe going viral or something. But maybe I'm overthinking it.
Hi, I use Suno, love it, it loves me back. I am a Lyricist and just about all my input contains my own lyrics, I am a fairly new channel on youtube putting out music while teaching my self to animate the videos for the songs. I have used Udio in the past, but now ever since the lawsuit came up I have not been able to get any kind of decent generation out of Udio. I do mark on all my videos that I release to youtube that they were created by Suno, such as Lyrics by Wizzdome Music by Suno ai... which I 100 percent don't mind doing, as I am not a monetized channel I am not looking to make money off of the music as this is my learning experience for animation, when I feel comfortable enough i the future and I can monetize on TH-cam I would like to move to that paid tier. But the discord thing sort of worries me... Putting the song on discord for download if it spread to someone who tried to upload it to a paid platform like Spotify or something like that, does this mean that the person who created it is liable? Even if they were not the one to upload it? (think that is where I get confused, love your videos thank you for your hard work.)
If you create a song with vocals and everything with the help of AI and then all instruments and real vocals are recorded. Is it AI content or does it count as being made by a human?
the sublicensing shit exists so that users can mix songs made by other users on the platform, reuse prompts, and most importantly, use it to train the next model. if suno doesn't take intermediate ownership of that data then how can they deliver it to me in my browser through the Suno platform? Suno is NOT going to be stealing your fucking music, lol. that's just hysteria. OpenAI has the same shit in their terms of service about words you provide to GPT. It's all about training data. Besides, if you're paid, you can use it all commercially. The terms are reasonable.
Lol we should call it "sue no" then sue the pants off of them! Wearing a lawsuit is all good and well, a lawtuxedo would b much more formal though and wouldn't it pay more $? Never filed a lawtuxedo b4 but new territory we should forge!
@StephanDavis-mg6ux i mean whatever u can think of to mean. Pretty sure a bowtie on a truck is already taken by chevy... as an aside I saw the TH-cam name bigus dickus which I was told is a monty python reference & I been laughing ever since...
Don't be fooled, If AI made it for you, you Did Not Create Anything nor do you have a clue how it was created. You probably don't even know what key or cords the web site shit out for you. You Created Nothing, A server did.
Publisher panel. You can pitch AI demoes for artists to get song cuts but not for sync thats the current 411 in the music industry it will change anyway with a new administration in 2025 for the USA anyway.
Everything that comes out of AI services like these is illegal because it's directly stolen from others. They may call it training , but it is stealing. Literally stealing other people's audio/waveforms and regurgitating them in some way which is illegal by any definition of copyright law.
Thats exactly what I was telling for months, and everbody laught at me. Sorry, your own fault if you ignore basic copyright laws. What did they think sunos business modell will be? Giving potential copyright income to the people almost for free? Yeah. Wanna live on that pony farm too...
I do like SUNO. I do create music with it. I share that music on plattforms like spotify, apple, youtube and more. I dont make money with it. It is a hobby for me. I am open and friendly with AI music and art creating. I do even use it in my job for IT and software security. AI is the future. Nowadays many people are saying it is bad and evil and blablabla .... haters gonna hate. I dont care about the negative talk and people. They destroy their own lifetime with hate. I say have fun and enjoy the awesome stuff we can make with AI.
Can a contract or agreement be above the law? The law stipulates the statue of limitation to 2 years in the US, so can they do this? If so, then, can I sign a contract getting a slave? Slavery is forbidden by law, so I can’t do it. So how can they be above the law? I find common law very fragile. I’m an IP attorney from Argentina and those terms you were reading are against written taws, so it has no value here and if you create a song on any of these platforms, you own it, period. The law is so protective here that you don’t even need to get it copyrighted because the work itself is a new entity that constitutes the copyright. And I can say the same for all Europe. We all have the same Napoleonic laws, unlike the US. But I’m asking because it would be very disappointing to find out that whatever you put in writing is above the spirit of the written law. I’d like to hear your thoughts about it. Thank you!
Ohh I've made already more than 5000 songs on Suno witch I sometimes generate some lyrics and sometimes I've written it komplettly thought I've owned all the rights to the music So no copyright for the Suno AI generated Music under my Name??????? What about the lyrics that are showing on Suno that I wrote????? Can anyone take them and make a new song with my lyrics???? Why is there no protection???? I'm a premium user
Knock on effect. A prompt techincally fits legal definition of a method of operation. Just like google translate or search terms. Copyrighting outputs could have an restrictive effect on other things like internet search due to copyright being handed out like candy. Also Venus Theory on his youtube tested out using an AI generated song based on his work to successfully trick the Content ID into launching takedown claims against his old original songs TL:DR. This could make independent online media a minefield of DMCA trolling.
I know it sounds silly, but it seems like a way around commercial use would be labeling it infomercial use. You would be saying informationally and commercially. Does putting the 2 together help? Informationally is protected. Infomercially is combining money use and informational use. Cancel each other out? Cofused hillbilly wordematcian over here...
Agree. I created about 60 songs with Suno, with all are own lyrics. At first it was great til we got to the last 10 or so. Then all the songs sounded the same. Even with selecting as many different types of music styles. It was fun though.
This discussion is already over , music has become democratized and the price of production has gone virtually to zero , millions and millions of people are instant producers and there is sumply not going back , adapt or die end of the story😂😂
That's for a song you have created or gotten permission to use. You can even hum a tune into your mic, suno will take that recording and make a song based on the melody you hummed lol
@@strakermidwich9679 As Suno admit that they used machine learning to train their tool to create derivative works of original music essentially cover songs in the style of original songs.. it is hypocritical of them to say "no covers" when thier business model is based on covers.
@@AeromancerOffical That's got nothing to do with the covers feature. They train thier models on other people songs freely available on the internet like open spotify. Just like ANY HUMAN being can do too. You cannot upload music you dont own to the covers feature otherwise you break their terms of service!!!!
@@strakermidwich9679 I disagree.. 1) if you ask Suno Ai (or any other ai music gen company) to create a similar IE derivative song with similar melody and musical style to an established song. It is a cover by association. The only thing that makes it "not a cover" is maybe the lyrics are different. 2) "cover song" is the exact wording. And if you Google the meaning of a "cover song" it means to create a derivative song that is the same or similar style to an established song. Suno could've changed the verbage to "use audio in song generation" or "use reference song" to create a persona based on uploaded audio. Which would give them more wriggle room to just "cover song" 3) it is a very strong likelihood that Ai generated music will be copyrightable to the human that creates the song. Much in the same way as a photographer using a camera owns the photo that the camera created, without the physical act of pointing and clicking on the camera.. the photo cannot be created. (That is the human interaction element of copyrighted material) Tens of millions of photographers OWN the photographs their cameras created. The camera is just the tool used in the process. 4) "it's in the terms and conditions" means next to nothing in an unregulated free for all that is Ai. The number one rule for Ai is Roberts own nothing. "Robot" by its definition means slave.
@@AeromancerOffical You are 100% missing the point. You CANNOT upload music you don't own to create a song based on the song you uploaded. If you are caught they will ban your account. It clearly states that!!!!
Ban AI music. It's just morally WRONG. Music is an expression...of soul. Supposedly. Corporations are trying to put the final nail in the coffin. If AI music is so great, why doesn't Suno just make their own and keep all the money?
I have to agree with you. I made some of it. Ha ha. I'm not good at songwriting, but with Suno I can practice. I'm finding it not as easy to make a good song as it may seem. Once I learn this MPK mini's functions, I will try my hand at making my own beats, then move forward. Not ready to start my own label, but it is nice to know where I can go to get some meaningful information and training if I want to venture into that realm.
Stop wasting time on this nonsense, make music for yourselves, with whatever you have... what's the point of asking an AI to make music for you... music wouldn't be for you in that case... music is being able to express what you have inside, not a program making it for you for whatever reason, better do something else with your lives.
What are your thoughts on AI generated music?
🟡 Become your Own Record Label:
www.topmusicattorney.com/becomeyourownrecordlabel
🟢 Free Split Sheet Template: www.topmusicattorney.com/splitsheet
📄 Music Contracts Templates: www.topmusicattorney.com/music-contracts
📺 Get Your Music Into Tv/Film/Games: www.topmusicattorney.com/sync
💻 #1 Resource For Artists And Producers: www.topmusicattorney.com
⚖ Hire An Attorney: www.delgadoentertainmentlaw.com
📰 Get My Newsletter: www.topmusicattorney.com/newsletter/
The future
@@DaveHoltArtMusic Agreed. A few dollars there, a few amazon purchases later, you got yourself something that most DJs do already.
1.1.2025 FB updates their TOS. Without, you can contest them, besides delete your account. What does that imply to users of this popular social media?
Just wanted to let you know on the link to your website, "monetize" is spelled "monitize" so there's a typo on there.
From the information I get from your show, the problem is in identifying what is AI and embedded, licensed beats and/or samples. The only thing I think can stop some issues is to embed a code in all AI generated showing what part is AI. Beats and Samples sold also need a unique ID, so people can't create a problem using Content ID.
But this is from their official FAQ:
A Basic plan allows you to create songs for non-commercial use, while songs created with Pro and Premier plans include commercial use. Here's an easy way to break down the two categories:
Commercial Use
Distribution: Putting your music on Spotify, Apple Music, etc.
TH-cam Content: Adding your songs to content on your monetizing channel
Direct Sales: Selling your songs, direct to consumers
Sync licensing: Getting your songs placed in tv, film, or video games
@@Sascha-wj9qz why is she saying that if this is in the subscription?
Yes, there is such quality that even for musicians it is simply disgusting! But to throw in your melody and see what the AI does with it, this can help you hear the future track from a different perspective and perhaps influence the final idea in the future :)
Yes please, create a tutorial on how to create a music copyright that is AI assisted. Thanks for your work.
@@giri.goyo_yt I would like that too
AI assisted just means its not 100% AI so creating your own lyrics for instance means its not 100% AI its AI assisted.
I agree.
8:20 The ownership with a paid subscription is the reason I chose Suno. I'm not trying to monetize the dozens of AI-assisted music pieces I generated, however, it is nice to know I can, should I get good enough to sell something, one day.
Same here!
What if you use GPT to create the lyrics and then Suno to sing it?
You own YOUR contribution, and according to GPT3.5 you can take ownership if you make a significant contribution to what the AI generated. So if all you did was use the prompts in the Need Ideas section of Suno, it might not qualify. If you write a micro-story, like I do at times, and the AI assists you in creating a song, you can take ownership of that. You can only copyright YOUR contribution, not what the AI generated.
@@climjames Cheers!
Udio is the same.
I'm using suno to help me with vocals. I chose suno because of the ownership of the content made with them. And pretty happy with the results. I relesae 11 commertial songs in a priod of the last 2 months. The vocals are good enough (after huge process) to be released commertialy in a music labels. Sorry for my english mistakes 😅
how are you editing the vocals ? that seems to be sunos downfall in my opinion
My fri3nd wanted to do ownership yet screwed themselves over to do this
what if i create an instrumental using paid tier. then use that in a short film on youtube. then my subscription expires. my channel is monetized. does it thus become a problem or do i retain all rights to use it in the shortfilm since i created it with a paid subscription
If you create it while paid suscription you own it, even if you cancel later you still own it. Its that simple.
@dnaEil13 that also is my understanding based on their terms that i read
Good information. I am one of the paid tier users of Suno and I have recently started submitting the songs I make through a distributor as well that gets it on all or most music platforms (apple music, spotify, pandora, youtube music, etc.) I also make my lyrics outside of Suno as well so that Suno doesn't generate those as well. I have heard some people do songs with Suno that also uses its generation of them, and to be honest, isn't that good.
I know there is also so much more I need to learn about marketing my music as well. Honestly I'm not worried about making any money from it, I only started to make music to help grow my TH-cam channel as I try and get myself to a point I can start adding other types of content as well.
I know one of the things I was worried about with the music I make, if some big record label ends up hearing it and liking it, and wanting to buy it or whatever, I don't know how to approach that since the music portion and the vocals are AI currently. I do plan on trying to make my own music using the software available to actually make your own by manually selecting everything. I don't really see a record label coming to me about any of my music, but if one does, I will have to try and find a local lawyer that deals with this type of stuff and have them help me through it so it doesn't come back to bite me.
If I have a paid account in suno and use the lyrics that I wrote but then turn around and take a melody I created in suno but reconstruct the song in Logic and get my own singer and try to copyright that song. Suno basically becomes the tool to help guide you to a good melody but the final result would have a few changes I did in Logic or protools
Love you and your valued information! Greatly appreciated my friend. Would love to see a video, going through the process of applying for copyright. I usually have the songs I am concerned about professionally drafted into sheet music. Thanks Again you are awesome sauce my friend!
I create AI music not for profit but to spread positivity and bring balance. I only went through a distributor to make my music available on Shazam.I use Suno because its terms align with my values. We have a unique chance to use music as a force for good, and that's my goal-whether my work is shared or not. Music can be a powerful tool to counter negativity, and I hope it reaches those who need it.
suno can take your music off platforms at any moment and stop your spreading positivity
Not with a paid plan.
@@Sascha-wj9qz What happens when you stop paying them?
Loved this video even though I don't personally use any AI music service. My question is could you cover other AI stuff? For example, I do have a subscription currently to Anthropics's AI, and even though I am in the clear, I'd just be cool to see you go through some more of these less niche AI services to see what their terms are. Maybe even the terms for OpenAI as well, of course, it's up to you and I get the specialization. Yet a lot of people use other more mainstream AI services a lot more often, such as Claude, to OpenAI, to even Google’s AI, and it'd be cool to see you go through their terms. Even if you decide not to take up my suggestion, I still enjoyed the video and quality time and effort you pulled together for us, so thank you!
Locally run AI is everything.
Locally run Ai is always going to be behind new releases from these companies, same reason I don’t understand why people use Linux, the amount of quality of life you lose for basic security is insane
@@JustRallax The more you have to lose the more value you place on security, autonomy, portability, predictability. You don't own your business if someone else can pull the plug.
@@bmatt2626 now you understand how money works....
Given my name is actually johnny. I really appreciate that she’s speaking directly to me.
Udio is definitely better in a lot of ways. Clearer outputs, i like the way it is set up and more editing is possible. But Suno does make more creative outputs and adheres to the prompts better. Especially when doing mashup genres and whatnot but I like both just because they allow us to "own" what we get as outputs and makes making music so much faster and easier. Thank you for explaining the terms. I hardly ever try to read them because they are so hard to understand most of the time so i just try to ask the developers or moderators at least before using something
Suno-created songs are just more of a bop that Udio-created songs.
Thanks for the Information. This is very helpful to have. It nice that you break down everything.
But how can suno know if you are using a song you made on their platform? Say i make money ith a song made with suno. Then i transform it on a other music editing software. They can't do anything . Anyway, i deleted all the songs from suno after its done and saved Suno.
Well if you obfuscate obviously it will be harder for them 💀
Thanks TOP, always feel better after your reviews. 🏆
Yes please show us how to register and copyright the song partially made by a.i
@@arijinal okay so it’s difficult to copyright 100% ai generated songs (obviously to protect real music artistry and its economic structure) but if you mix drums over the top or sing over it or do something original with it like write your own lyrics, heavy editing or audio engineering production on it then copyright is approved! These are called ai assisted songs and are allowed under creativity clauses, they cease being ai songs because you added a creative influence to it and you are human!
@ thanks for the info!
@@poorsillyboythat's what i intend to do.. but what software did u use to register the copyright protrction?
Very interesting video, but I have a question. If I generated a song with Suno (using lyrics I own) and, for specific reasons (such as tonal adjustments), I completely remake it with different sounds while keeping the structure, melody, and arrangement, and then have it sung by a singer I want to promote (essentially creating an entirely new recording), what happens?
Thanks for your work. It will be interesting how things change in the legal field due to these lawsuits. Glad you are here to help give us some updated news. God bless.
Question: If you have a paid membership with suno can you use music you create on your monetized TH-cam channel?
I think you can. Assuming I understood what I read.
Your name brings up a question, What makes using Universal Pictures not a violation of trademark. Is it how it is spelled or what?
Yes and in visual media as well.
Of course you can. You force your granmda to sing with sterm look and monetise it. This is music. There are no morals.
@@climjames Oh its huge one and would be rejected by distributors. Immediately. Straight to name jail.
Question, If I plug in a few prompts but use my own lyrics, do they now own my lyrics, or can I use my own lyrics any way I choose?
I've done that.. have the same question, I regret doing that now. Damn platforms.
@@LuisRdzG10 No you own EVERYTHING you plug in to Suno including lyrics. That's if you're on a paid plan btw. But I don't think anyone would sensibly plug anything into Suno on a free plan!
They’re stupid if they think they can ban derivative works. That’s protected by copyright law isn’t it?
To begin, I want to say that I love your videos, they are both informative and entertaining.
I’d like to weigh in because I use Suno for all the songs on my channel, and I prefer it over Udio due to my musical taste. While Udio has better voice quality, its music often feels bland and uninspired to me.
I actually find Suno’s terms of service to be quite fair. Since I’m using their AI, it seems reasonable that it gets trained on my input (lyrics, instruments, my voice, etc.). I frequently use the upload feature to create songs, and I don’t mind contributing to improve their AI. I also understand that, given the sheer volume of outputs, it’s possible for the AI to produce something that closely resembles or even matches one of my outputs. Therefor In the ongoing court case, I wouldn’t be surprised if they argue that training their AI on copyrighted music was necessary not to reproduce it, but to teach the AI what not to use due to copyright restrictions. By doing so, the AI also learns what it can use and how to structure songs. Essentially, they may claim they had no choice because, given the high volume of outputs, it would only be a matter of time before the AI unintentionally outputted copyrighted music.
Most people creating AI songs aren’t doing it for money or fame, they just want to share their ideas and thoughts with the world. I know firsthand how much time can go into crafting just one AI song, even though many people won’t appreciate the effort simply because it involves AI. And that’s perfectly fine.
@@Corteliax totally agree that creating anything with AI assiatance takes a lot of work. most people think quality stuff pours out at the click of a button.
In SUNO, it is possible to remove the songs you generated. What is the implication of that, if I just remember the song and make it some other way once it is deleted?
One thing to take into account is that it may not be a self contained system, but may have or introduce subprocessors later. That’s one reason why they claim such broad rights. They don’t want a situation where the input is processed by a third party, which is solely there to augment their own process, and when someone finds out, they sue them because ”I didn’t give Acme inc permission to process my data, only you!”
Suno used my lyrics in one of their own songs in V4 demo. It's about my brother and referenced Cain and Able. I don't mind though. It's all good.
Is soundraw the same?
I write lyrics and put them into suno to make songs. I upload them to TH-cam, Should I put the name suno in the description or in the title?
Please learn to write music yourself. It's not that hard and the satisfaction is light years ahead of some computer program. Don't encourage these mofos.
Hi Krystle I hope your ok. I’ve not tried Suno properly yet but I’ve used it a bit to see if it did what I needed. I’m not a drummer but I’m after a Japanese huge wardrum simple track 7 minutes long how would I get that and is AI even capable of doing that?
Doing a "how to AI proof your music" would be a good idea..
Please. You know it is not black and white like that. Transferring copyrights in music with a single agreement, especially for future songs that haven’t been created, is problematic and unusual for several reasons. In copyright law, especially in the context of music, it’s crucial to be very specific when transferring rights. Agreements usually need to specify exactly which rights are being transferred, for which works, and for what duration. Copyright law is generally based on the principle that you should always specify the works involved when transferring rights. This specificity ensures clarity for both the creator and the party receiving the rights, helping to avoid disputes or misunderstandings about which works are covered. Such board agreements are legally complex and probably would not hold up in court if challenged.
super thorough,, thank you for every bit of it-,,
I use Udio, I write all of my material and will be adding my own stems to it also more from me instead of it being solely a full Ai project. I don’t use Suno their voices sound too distinctive
Unless expressly authorized...like when you become a paying customer instead of using it for free. From the terms for commercial use and ownership "If you were subscribed with a Pro or Premier plan when the song was created, you are the owner of the song. You also retain the rights to commercial use for the song, even if you end your subscription.
If you are using the free version of Suno (our Basic tier), we retain ownership of the songs you generate, but you are allowed to use those songs for non-commercial purposes, subject to your compliance with Suno’s Terms of Service."
Basically you can use it on your socials/anywhere BUT without getting any $$$ or any $$ involved. Its as simple as that. Tips/Donations you get from people/subs are fine.
Well, there is no copyrights in France, neither in many countries, then any copyriights consideration is of few interest. The point is that copyrights is very local to US. Regarding intellectual rights, Suno works rather well worldwide.
I wouldn't even worry about Suno the sound quality is horrible
@@DJGALAXYPRODUCTION you haven’t tried v4 have you.
@@domehouse79 he obviously has not because it’s not out yet 😭
You can download the stems and then beef up the sound to a nice quality in your DAW
So, Suno has the right to license your content to be used in a movie soundtrack or tv? Sounds like Suno gets the right to use uploaded content however it wants. Is that your read?
I think it means that anything you use to generate AI content with the service can end up as part of the training data for the AI generation for everyone else forever.
No. Not if you're on a paid plan!
Their FAQs say you can use it for commercial purposes. I'm starting to get very upset with Suno's FAQs conflicting with the TOS.
You can use it for commercial purposes only for the songs you create while on a paid tier.
Yeah they can be sue for false advertising
@@MuscleMomAmongUs-i7n They do clearly say you can use all output for commercial purposes as long as you're on a paid plan. You can't if you're on FREE. It's pretty clear!
Please yes, make a video on how to register for copyright AI-assisted song, I can even be a guinea pig an assist in some sort of quid pro quo arranngement beneficial to us both! LMK! =)
Yo, she is one smart ass woman respect her big up pls. Keep up your jabs and hooks cus you good, just saying ❤ respect
Rule of thumb: If you upload *anything* to an online service, cloud etc. or use such a service to create anything, assume you are basically giving it to them. Always ask yourself, will you have the money to sue them.
Trying to make any sort of money from ai generated music at this point of time is dumb in itself
Why does it seem like these TOS are similar to those used for games? Is it because at its inception, this was the most comprehensive protection for the providers to treat AI as something for users' entertainment purposes only, and not as a digital musical instrument/tool? We have many plugins and effects now that are laced with AI. Are we going to get to a place where if we use any of those, they will start claiming ownership and free use of anything we create while using them? 🤔
Don’t feed A.I., you’ll regret later!
World wide rights? Really, that's great. It means I still retsin full rights on the lunar colony, Mars, and the whole rest of the multiverse!
I have a paid Subscription with suno so thanks for that
Some services states that you 'own' the output, but in some case I've seen terms that say that if you make any money from it, they will earn 50% of revenue generated if the music originated from their service!!! so how it that ownership?
Have you ever covered the ai App, Donna? I would be very curious what the legal rights are to that platform. I love the work you are doing on your channel btw.
Didn't Donna disappear ?
@@StratsRUs Maybe as a website but it is app on iPhone and I assume they have it for Android. I have a subscription that I am going to cancel soon until I need it again.
I used it to write a revenge rap for a guy who is a stalker and beats women, called Gary Scary. I wrote the lyrics. The subscription is like $9.98 a month or cheaper if you purchase for the year.
There are different extras, too. Like separating the vocals and instrumentals for an extra charge and it's like $16.00 to download a certificate of ownership if you want to use it commercially.
I would be curious if one even needs it. I would love to see it covered here to look at their agreement and small print because my friend uses it a lot more than I did. I only wrote 2 songs, Donna created the arrangement. I probably would write some podcast intros and other project related material if I knew downloading the certificate and filing for copyright would protect me. It does a pretty good job, but I have no idea where it got its training.
It says with the subscription you can use any of your work commercially but I think the extra cost for the cert dl file gives us an extra layer of cred to offer up to any argument on copyright. How legal that holds up, that's not my area of expertise.
Hope to see this channel cover it some day.
i used
lalals(not lalala) but someone said i could only use vocals and that i couldn't use their instrumental(sounds weird to me since never saw on website where it stated this)
but now i use a website called ai music
although ai music is a suspicious website
maybe i'll go to suno at some point
I am happy I found you I have subscribed currently I don’t have a serious music business but I will stay connected in case things change ❤
I created something on Suno but didn't publish it on Suno... and everything created on Suno (free tier) and not published will be removed after certain number of days. Now that it disappeared from my created list, how will Suno claim it was theirs? Just an honest question because I already posted the song on TH-cam.
And what if I created a good song on Suno during free tier, published it, then subscribed (paid), do I have the right to the song?
What happens if the song was generated by AI, say an instrumental; however, you took that song, or parts of several songs which are all AI generated BUT sliced them together to make a new song: in other words, an Arrangement? Curious how that works and not sure if there's an answer? All of the music AI generated (no protected) but the arrangement, how the song progresses, was assembled by a human? Curious about your thoughts.
I think that falls into the category of "made partly with a.i." that she mentioned. Kinda same as using samples of human made songs; it's a new piece, but they are credited and get some share of the royalties. With Suno though, you're not allowed to monetize it at all if it was made with a free subscription, and with paid one you get all royalties.
Eso en mi país éso se conoce como "cláusulas abusivas". Y la mayoría de esas cláusulas violan derechos naturales. La mayoría de las plataformas digitales abusan de éso, ya que saben perfectamente que el usuario oprime los botones "aceptar" y "siguiente" sin leer nada. Pero como ley y justicia son dos cosas diferentes, es bueno ver (como dices tú) que en pocos meses muchas de esas plataformas desaparecen...
Gracias por ocuparte..!
Their real business model is that TH-cam automatically pays out for copyright infringement. It wouldn't stand up in court as ai content can't be copyrighted.
PLEASE DO A HOW TO COPYRIGHT YOUR MUSIC! 👏
I was aware of the terms that said using the paid service, you own the song, but the free one you don't. I wasn't aware that they are sooooo loose in everything else. It is like they are saying "Yo, it's all good bro...but also it's not, but kinda is...know what I mean?"
I like what you said about copywrite of ai music as well. This was my interpretation. I have a lot of people that come by my channel and say that you can't do it. My position was that the case against it was for that specific piece of artwork but never said you could never copyright ai stuff. You just need to prove enough human interaction in order to satisfy whoever is going to stamp the approval.
As far as the Sony v Suno / Udio lawsuit. I'm really curious if the recent win of Open ai against news agencies will impact this. They basically said "Yeah, I don't see a problem with ai learning from others works".
Could you please do an 'EXPOSED' video, reviewing the 'Too Lost Music Distribution' terms of service?
What if I re-record a Suno song, replace all the track like a cover song, what happens then?
i once covered a famouse metal band's song, even quite remade it, and when i uploaded it on youtube i got a copyright claim. so the platform can analyze sequences of notes. even in other tonalities.
I agree that some of that doesn't make any sense to me. Time will tell but I will not be using AI for now.
I only have one question regarding Suno and what you just explained here... Let's say someone is using Suno in order to create previews/prototypes of songs that they eventually want to produce in a studio (i.e. a legit song made by real people, recorded on site), would Suno be able to claim copyrights on that because of the similarities with the prototype created first through their service? It's not the first time I see people being inspired to record actual songs based on what they created with Suno (myself included), but would that even be possible? I somehow highly doubt that mentioning the song was originally created/prototyped using Suno would be enough for them, especially if it's a hit making a decent amount of money...
If you believe these T&C are awful you should never read a major label standard deal …. This fight against Ai is the same against mp3 25 years ago
Lawers are LOVING AI
I just came from Venus Theory's video on how he stole his own music using AI and copyright law loopholes.
I wonder how Suno being able to just claim a song a user made might potentially collide with someone stealing another person's music and maybe going viral or something.
But maybe I'm overthinking it.
Well, if you’re an actual musician you can use Suno to help you create content off platform 😊
Hi, I use Suno, love it, it loves me back. I am a Lyricist and just about all my input contains my own lyrics, I am a fairly new channel on youtube putting out music while teaching my self to animate the videos for the songs. I have used Udio in the past, but now ever since the lawsuit came up I have not been able to get any kind of decent generation out of Udio. I do mark on all my videos that I release to youtube that they were created by Suno, such as Lyrics by Wizzdome Music by Suno ai... which I 100 percent don't mind doing, as I am not a monetized channel I am not looking to make money off of the music as this is my learning experience for animation, when I feel comfortable enough i the future and I can monetize on TH-cam I would like to move to that paid tier. But the discord thing sort of worries me... Putting the song on discord for download if it spread to someone who tried to upload it to a paid platform like Spotify or something like that, does this mean that the person who created it is liable? Even if they were not the one to upload it? (think that is where I get confused, love your videos thank you for your hard work.)
If you create a song with vocals and everything with the help of AI and then all instruments and real vocals are recorded. Is it AI content or does it count as being made by a human?
the sublicensing shit exists so that users can mix songs made by other users on the platform, reuse prompts, and most importantly, use it to train the next model. if suno doesn't take intermediate ownership of that data then how can they deliver it to me in my browser through the Suno platform?
Suno is NOT going to be stealing your fucking music, lol. that's just hysteria. OpenAI has the same shit in their terms of service about words you provide to GPT. It's all about training data.
Besides, if you're paid, you can use it all commercially. The terms are reasonable.
Omg Suno might notice me?
Suno by Adobe
Lol we should call it "sue no" then sue the pants off of them! Wearing a lawsuit is all good and well, a lawtuxedo would b much more formal though and wouldn't it pay more $? Never filed a lawtuxedo b4 but new territory we should forge!
So a bowtie on the truck or what you mean 🤔
@StephanDavis-mg6ux i mean whatever u can think of to mean. Pretty sure a bowtie on a truck is already taken by chevy... as an aside I saw the TH-cam name bigus dickus which I was told is a monty python reference & I been laughing ever since...
I dont understand why all of those illegally trained AIs all havent been sued out of existence yet
At least 13. Don't you have to be 18 to be legally bound by a contract?
4:35 only for free accounts.
Well, i dont mind. I will be happy if anyone like my music, mostly its about lyrics : D
Don't be fooled, If AI made it for you, you Did Not Create Anything nor do you have a clue how it was created.
You probably don't even know what key or cords the web site shit out for you. You Created Nothing, A server did.
Publisher panel. You can pitch AI demoes for artists to get song cuts but not for sync thats the current 411 in the music industry it will change anyway with a new administration in 2025 for the USA anyway.
Soon Suno will not be needed, people will be able to what they want on any AI LLM.
Only on the free plan, of you sibscribe everything is yours
I've used Suno (paid) to create songs but all with my own lyrics. Is that copyrightable?
@@epytaffskitchenstink I wanna Know that Too
Copyright in general is BS.
Everything that comes out of AI services like these is illegal because it's directly stolen from others. They may call it training , but it is stealing. Literally stealing other people's audio/waveforms and regurgitating them in some way which is illegal by any definition of copyright law.
Thats exactly what I was telling for months, and everbody laught at me.
Sorry, your own fault if you ignore basic copyright laws. What did they think sunos business modell will be?
Giving potential copyright income to the people almost for free? Yeah. Wanna live on that pony farm too...
I don't know much about the Law. However, I don't believe ANY countries laws can be applied to a Bald Eagle.. 😉
The whole AI thing is trash and of no benefit to humanity. Can’t wait until the bubble bursts.
Pliiz, dont touch the zoom
I do like SUNO. I do create music with it. I share that music on plattforms like spotify, apple, youtube and more. I dont make money with it. It is a hobby for me. I am open and friendly with AI music and art creating. I do even use it in my job for IT and software security. AI is the future. Nowadays many people are saying it is bad and evil and blablabla .... haters gonna hate. I dont care about the negative talk and people. They destroy their own lifetime with hate. I say have fun and enjoy the awesome stuff we can make with AI.
Thank you for trying to kill humanity's spirit.
I dont try anything like that. I just use software tools to create art and improve digital protection.
Can a contract or agreement be above the law? The law stipulates the statue of limitation to 2 years in the US, so can they do this? If so, then, can I sign a contract getting a slave? Slavery is forbidden by law, so I can’t do it. So how can they be above the law? I find common law very fragile. I’m an IP attorney from Argentina and those terms you were reading are against written taws, so it has no value here and if you create a song on any of these platforms, you own it, period. The law is so protective here that you don’t even need to get it copyrighted because the work itself is a new entity that constitutes the copyright. And I can say the same for all Europe. We all have the same Napoleonic laws, unlike the US. But I’m asking because it would be very disappointing to find out that whatever you put in writing is above the spirit of the written law. I’d like to hear your thoughts about it. Thank you!
The title should just stop at "Don't release AI music"
You buy the track on a block chain then you register the track with the copyright office you own the mp3 if you created any human elements.
Ohh I've made already more than 5000 songs on Suno witch I sometimes generate some lyrics and sometimes I've written it komplettly thought I've owned all the rights to the music
So no copyright for the Suno AI generated Music under my Name???????
What about the lyrics that are showing on Suno that I wrote????? Can anyone take them and make a new song with my lyrics????
Why is there no protection????
I'm a premium user
Knock on effect. A prompt techincally fits legal definition of a method of operation. Just like google translate or search terms.
Copyrighting outputs could have an restrictive effect on other things like internet search due to copyright being handed out like candy.
Also Venus Theory on his youtube tested out using an AI generated song based on his work to successfully trick the Content ID into launching takedown claims against his old original songs
TL:DR. This could make independent online media a minefield of DMCA trolling.
Attorneys are people you pay to RTFM /^,^\
I know it sounds silly, but it seems like a way around commercial use would be labeling it infomercial use. You would be saying informationally and commercially. Does putting the 2 together help? Informationally is protected. Infomercially is combining money use and informational use. Cancel each other out? Cofused hillbilly wordematcian over here...
This AI shit breaks my brain! It makes me just not want to use any of it.
Agree. I created about 60 songs with Suno, with all are own lyrics. At first it was great til we got to the last 10 or so. Then all the songs sounded the same. Even with selecting as many different types of music styles. It was fun though.
This discussion is already over , music has become democratized and the price of production has gone virtually to zero , millions and millions of people are instant producers and there is sumply not going back , adapt or die end of the story😂😂
Suno can't say "do not use material that isn't owned" as they have a "cover song" function built into their service.
That's for a song you have created or gotten permission to use. You can even hum a tune into your mic, suno will take that recording and make a song based on the melody you hummed lol
@@strakermidwich9679 As Suno admit that they used machine learning to train their tool to create derivative works of original music essentially cover songs in the style of original songs.. it is hypocritical of them to say "no covers" when thier business model is based on covers.
@@AeromancerOffical That's got nothing to do with the covers feature. They train thier models on other people songs freely available on the internet like open spotify. Just like ANY HUMAN being can do too. You cannot upload music you dont own to the covers feature otherwise you break their terms of service!!!!
@@strakermidwich9679 I disagree.. 1) if you ask Suno Ai (or any other ai music gen company) to create a similar IE derivative song with similar melody and musical style to an established song. It is a cover by association. The only thing that makes it "not a cover" is maybe the lyrics are different. 2) "cover song" is the exact wording. And if you Google the meaning of a "cover song" it means to create a derivative song that is the same or similar style to an established song. Suno could've changed the verbage to "use audio in song generation" or "use reference song" to create a persona based on uploaded audio. Which would give them more wriggle room to just "cover song" 3) it is a very strong likelihood that Ai generated music will be copyrightable to the human that creates the song. Much in the same way as a photographer using a camera owns the photo that the camera created, without the physical act of pointing and clicking on the camera.. the photo cannot be created. (That is the human interaction element of copyrighted material) Tens of millions of photographers OWN the photographs their cameras created. The camera is just the tool used in the process. 4) "it's in the terms and conditions" means next to nothing in an unregulated free for all that is Ai. The number one rule for Ai is Roberts own nothing. "Robot" by its definition means slave.
@@AeromancerOffical You are 100% missing the point. You CANNOT upload music you don't own to create a song based on the song you uploaded. If you are caught they will ban your account. It clearly states that!!!!
Ban AI music. It's just morally WRONG. Music is an expression...of soul. Supposedly. Corporations are trying to put the final nail in the coffin. If AI music is so great, why doesn't Suno just make their own and keep all the money?
@@keithdunwoody1302 shush kiddo
Suno isnt that good anyways, you can tell a song is Suno
80% of Suno songs are B.S.
I have to agree with you. I made some of it. Ha ha. I'm not good at songwriting, but with Suno I can practice. I'm finding it not as easy to make a good song as it may seem.
Once I learn this MPK mini's functions, I will try my hand at making my own beats, then move forward. Not ready to start my own label, but it is nice to know where I can go to get some meaningful information and training if I want to venture into that realm.
In what way?
@@mwright80 Most songs all sound the same or, something you've heard before!
Same basic "pop-snot" sound.
@@mwright80 not well done
95 percent are trash
Stop wasting time on this nonsense, make music for yourselves, with whatever you have... what's the point of asking an AI to make music for you... music wouldn't be for you in that case... music is being able to express what you have inside, not a program making it for you for whatever reason, better do something else with your lives.