Nationalism and Internationalism | Arslan Zahid Khan | International Relations |
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ก.พ. 2022
- #CSS #ArslanZahidKhan #InternationalRelations
Nationalism is a modern movement. Throughout history people have been attached to their native soil, to the traditions of their parents, and to established territorial authorities, but it was not until the end of the 18th century that nationalism began to be a generally recognized sentiment molding public and private life and one of the great, if not the greatest, single determining factors of modern history. Because of its dynamic vitality and its all-pervading character, nationalism is often thought to be very old; sometimes it is mistakenly regarded as a permanent factor in political behaviour. Actually, the American and French revolutions may be regarded as its first powerful manifestations. After penetrating the new countries of Latin America, it spread in the early 19th century to central Europe and from there, toward the middle of the century, to eastern and southeastern Europe. At the beginning of the 20th century, nationalism flowered in Asia and Africa. Thus, the 19th century has been called the age of nationalism in Europe, while the 20th century witnessed the rise and struggle of powerful national movements throughout Asia and Africa.
Nationalism, translated into world politics, implies the identification of the state or nation with the people-or at least the desirability of determining the extent of the state according to ethnographic principles. In the age of nationalism, but only in the age of nationalism, the principle was generally recognized that each nationality should form a state-its state-and that the state should include all members of that nationality. Formerly states, or territories under one administration, were not delineated by nationality. People did not give their loyalty to the nation-state but to other, different forms of political organization: the city-state, the feudal fief and its lord, the dynastic state, the religious group, or the sect. The nation-state was nonexistent during the greater part of history, and for a very long time it was not even regarded as an ideal. In the first 15 centuries of the Common Era, the ideal was the universal world-state, not loyalty to any separate political entity. The Roman Empire had set the great example, which survived not only in the Holy Roman Empire of the Middle Ages but also in the concept of the res publica christiana (“Christian republic” or community) and in its later secularized form of a united world civilization.
As political allegiance, before the age of nationalism, was not determined by nationality, so civilization was not thought of as nationally determined. During the Middle Ages, civilization was looked upon as determined religiously; for all the different nationalities of Christendom as well as for those of Islam, there was but one civilization-Christian or Muslim-and but one language of culture-Latin (or Greek) or Arabic (or Persian). Later, in the periods of the Renaissance and of Classicism, it was the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations that became a universal norm, valid for all peoples and all times. Still later, French civilization was accepted throughout Europe as the valid civilization for educated people of all nationalities. It was only at the end of the 18th century that, for the first time, civilization was considered to be determined by nationality. It was then that the principle was put forward that people could be educated only in their own mother tongue, not in languages of other civilizations and other times, whether they were classical languages or the literary creations of other peoples who had reached a high degree of civilization.
From the end of the 18th century on, the nationalization of education and public life went hand in hand with the nationalization of states and political loyalties. Poets and scholars began to emphasize cultural nationalism first. They reformed the mother tongue, elevated it to the rank of a literary language, and delved deep into the national past. Thus, they prepared the foundations for the political claims for national statehood soon to be raised by the people in whom they had kindled the spirit.
Before the 18th century there had been evidences of national feeling among certain groups at certain periods, especially in times of stress and conflict. The rise of national feeling to major political importance was encouraged by a number of complex developments: the creation of large centralized states ruled by absolute monarchs who destroyed the old feudal allegiances; the secularization of life and of education, which fostered the vernacular languages and weakened the ties of church and sect; the growth of commerce, which demanded larger territorial units to allow scope for the dynamic spirit of the rising middle classes and their capitalistic enterprise.
Facebook Link: / arslanzahid9369
Contact Number: 03224059540
Nice
Anyone here in 2024😂
Yess me✌️
@@islamrashid3032 ohky 💜🤣 well done 👍🏿🙈🤣
Yes I am 🤚
@@user-pd8tr6zb3o ohh 💜 well come 🙈💜🫂🫂
🙋♀️🙋♀️🥲
I can't thank you enough for explaining in such a great way.
Very informative vedio, Thanks Sir 👍👍👍👍👍
You are proud of Pakistan 🇵🇰.
I listen your css journey.
Sir your way of explaining is so unique and clear, please keep on making videos on different topics, don't stop making videos as these are so helpful.
Brilliant job we like and I also thank ful to you
WA ALAIKUM ASSALM WA REHMATULLAHI WA BARKATUHU
Impressive sir. You are doing a great job.
Great Sir g.
You are one if the best teacher I have ever seen.
Pehly mujhy IR boring lugta tha. Now, it is my favourite subject.
Nice explanation ✨
Love from India ❣️
Jazak Allah Sir
Your way of explaining is so best and more informative 👏 keep up the good job
Jazakallah sir ❤
Superb sir g . Stay blessed.
What a method! ❤
Sir in this age of globalisation, nationalism is still a powerful ideology. You can at any time activate nationalistic ideas in a nation. You can find strong sense of nationalism during Pak vs India clash. Pak vs Israel issue. India vs China issue and so on. Whole Pakistan is divided on ethnic lines but "Nationalism still exists even without a nation"
Thank you sir❤❤
MashaAllah
بہت خوب۔۔سر
Super elaborative 👌
Great 👏
Thank you sir
you are great sir.
sir you are doing a great job
Sir superb videos
Love You Sir helped me alot
Zbrdst ،👏
Really Great sir
Thank you so so so much much ❤❤❤ sir
outstanding
great sir 👌
Sir in many countries multiple nations live how to relate this with the territorial concept of nationalism
Sir ap jis word ka use karay uss ko thoda explain karay otherwise The best lecture
Sir is ki types k bary ma khuch Bata dy please
The best and perfect lectures... Dear sir 1 month in exam pls upload more videos
Can u plz explain why Iqbal denounced the idea of nationalism?
Diff bw nation-state, state and nation?
Replies are highly appreciated.
Jazakallah in advance.
Sir please explain Balochi nationalism counter nationalism....
Sir nationalism ki types b smja dein
Sir what about india with huge diversity
Sir is ki types k name bata dy
There is my exm at 9 Am
Territorial nationalism: Russia’s impending invasion of Ukraine.