I caught this movie tonight, I assumed the reason that he gets called Edward at the end was that at some point during the stabbing and him going to prison, they found out his true identity. I guess getting processed in the legal system would mean that he'd had to use his legal name. You might be right with your analysis though.
Yeah that’s totally a valid reason too! I often look so much more closely at the thematic side of things, so I’m super glad when people like you provide the more practical angle, I appreciate it!
หลายเดือนก่อน +3
They call him Guy in the restaurant. I Think the woman he saw, was that doctor in the beggining, who didn't like to look at him. Seems like he saw an oportunity to talk about everything. They asked him about himself. And he choosed to ignore her. And then OSwald tells him that he hasn't changed a bit.
I was sooo confused about that woman for the longest time, so I’m glad I could offer a plausible interpretation for you and super pleased you enjoyed the video, thank you so much!!
Such a simple yet interesting topic to explore. So many people think that they would be happy, if only X happened. But time and time again be it relationships, money, recognition or, like here, looks, it always turns out that the only thing that can make you truly happy and fullfilled is your inner self.
Surprised the typewriter didn’t come up. I took it as the baggage we personally carry and need to let go of when everyone else is dismissive of it. Oswald and Ingrid don’t seem to care about it
I love how throughout this film you also realize how Edward/Guy real does make his life worse for himself. Hes boring, no confidence, he even changed his name to “Guy” because he had no other creativity besides that. Then we see Oswald, the absolute antithesis of his character. Wonderful performance by Pearson. He nailed this role, you want to so badly hate him but you realize he is far more confident than Edward/Guy ever was.
Your analysis of the film made me realize why I loved A Different Man. It's such a great movie involving identity and perspective with Sebastian Stan giving what I feel is one of his best performances yet. The physical performance he provided when he was playing as Edward is nothing short of astounding. Great video. :)
I don't know if it's "the message" or "the point" of this movie, but I really saw myself in Edward. The idea that if only things were different, if only I was more attractive, more successful, if only I could transform myself, life would be better - it's all a lie. At the end of the day, you're still you. People with a more confident, more positive outlook on life can find happiness, no matter their circumstances. And seeing a girl I like rejecting my advances but spending time with a guy who is just a different shade of me - that hits way too close. What am I supposed to do with that? I don't know, but this movie made me feel things & I guess that's the point of art.
Also the scene at 2:40, the man tells him to go do Jiu Jitsu which Edward refuses. Oswald on the other hand was doing it which highlights Edward’s regret throughout the film of not being different personality wise before.
During the scene where Ingrid leaves. There is an Easter egg of John merrick on tv. FYI. Elephant man. Also amazed at why no other video mentions David lynch elephant man
ok you might not believe me, but I caught this the first time in the theatre cuz Elephant Man is one of my favorite movies, and I realized that that shot of John Merrick was part of the "disfigurement at work" training video Ingrid and Edward were watching during that scene. I just forgot to talk about it in the video and noticed it again when I was editing, but I was so close to uploading, I figured it wasn't worth it to go back and record some audio on that reference because I also figured it was very highly likely someone would mention it in the comments, and here you are! So thank you! Elephant Man is a classic with a lot of very clear thematic parallels with this, I love both films dearly!
@@lucasblue20 lol it’s like a modern day non David lynch version. John merrick was definitely much worse off than Oswald and Edward tho. I had cacophobia and that movie and mask were in my life at a young age and nothing scared me but that. But I learned i was actually not afraid but afraid of my emotions to care for people like then. I can’t even watch wonder without tearing up….
@@lucasblue20 like I shy away extremely if I see someone that is disfigured badly. But it’s not because I think oooo get away from me. I am thinking how hard their life is and what they have gone through and I get extremely sad that I don’t like to deal with it. My niece had tumors as early as 2 years old. Miraculously she still alive. Can’t operate on a few because they are on or around spine/ brain so she is 25 but mentally 12
Yay! It posted truly loved your analysis of this movie. I would say the only thing that i would have loved your opinion on would also be the symbolism (if any) behind the typewriter and it continuously getting passed around. But i loved how you broke it up between perspective and identity. I also love how so on the nose they went wih Edward changing his name to "guy" where at one point of time he was so unique, and now he is just "some guy". But yes, loved this movie. Loved the dark witty humour throughout. Thank you for covering
Omg so glad you finally got to see this! And I was super pleased you and your partner loved it like I did. Honestly, I never picked up on the significance of the typewriter itself, besides the quote Edward typed that I mention in the video, it'd be interesting to see if any other viewers have some fresh ideas on it. And yes, totally, the particular choice of the name, Guy screams that Edward isn't being who he really is. And again, totally agree, this was one of the funniest movies of the year to me, it was so subtle and honest and self-deprecating and clever, super thrilled I finally got to share this and that you got to see it. Thank you so much!
I think in a sense the typewriter is an authentic expression of who Edward is - it produces the one scrap of true expression we see from him, but he doesn’t appreciate it and hands it off to Ingrid immediately. She doesn’t properly understand it (misremembering where he got it) and likes that it makes her ‘look’ like a writer. She then offers it to “Guy” later, and when asked where it came from, doesn’t tell him about Edward, but simply says it ‘looks Italian.’ She says he can have it, ‘give it a proper home.’ We see it again in Oswald’s apartment, where someone commented that it was cool and Oswald immediately offers it to them. As far as we see, aside from Edward’s brief line, nobody uses this typewriter for its intended purpose or to create anything meaningful; they express interest in it as a statement piece and then easily hand it off at the first opportunity. The color red appears in a lot of Edward’s clothing but phases out of “Guy”’s wardrobe, especially as he abandons his past identity. It’s also the color Ingrid paints Edward’s door, that is painted back over again when Oswald moves in. In the same way the idea of Edward is passed around and exploited without any real understanding of the man, with no credit to the actual man himself, the typewriter is never used to write anything, but is aways on display, catching and losing interest as it is passed between anyone who takes notice of it, because nobody cares to keep it as more than a novelty item. I think it’s also interesting to note that it was something that had some underused authenticity to Edward, but he gave it to Ingrid like it was worthless, and she immediately took the meaning of it and ran with it (“didn’t your mother give you this?”), but then she offers it back to “Guy” and he doesn’t accept it, so it goes to Oswald, who doesn’t have any attachment to it and happily gives it away. Sorry if this is a little long and ramble-y - I just saw the movie for the first time yesterday and I was so blown away that I just stayed for the second showing and saw it again immediately. (The theater employees said I could lol)
8:50 - That's the guy he talks to about his liver pills being placebos. I think this is when he realizes that he can technically do whatever he wants now, because he's "a different man." Just takes him too long to realize that he's the same old insecure self, on the inside.
Ohh damn, I didn't catch that. I think I'm starting to notice actors re-appearing in this film to play more than one minor role (or the same character seen in a completely different light) which either way totally serves to your point, thanks for this!
The movie is very Charlie's kaufmanish if its a thing i had the same feeling watching being john malkovich while watching this that feeling of helplessness which both protagonists feel
thanks for this... I knew there was something more I couldn't grasped. You made me change my rating from 3.5 to 4.5. What a brilliant, complex, allegorical movie.
How did you annalize this movie? How many times did you have to see it? In my country is still on the cinema so I was wondering if you had to go a lot of times and take notes and research or what, just really wondering
2 things I’m almost sure about-goth he sees at the bar after transformation was the male nurse at the clinic when he was asking about placebos & meds. I also think single woman in last dinner scene was the same girl walking with his neighbor in park that committed suicide. I also feel like she was the same girl talking to guy at bar (director of movie)
Amazing analysis! Thank you for this video. I agree with you on everything, except on one thing. I have a slightly different theory about that woman from the ending scene. She seems to also appear in the scene around the 41 minutes mark, where Edward has finished going through his transformation and is heading to the bar. As he's leaving his apartment and about to go downstairs, we see this woman in black, probably mourning clothes, standing in front of the apartment of the neighbour who killed himself. Edward looks at her briefly and then finally leaves. Maybe my idea seems simplorious given her clothes, but I think that she represents death. Throughout the film we see several mentions to suicide. The neighbor does it; Ingrid asks Edward if he'd ever do it; when asked about what happened to Edward, Guy says he died that way; and in the play the suicide is discussed a few times as a possibility for Edward's character. I feel like after his transformation Guy goes through the same thing as his neighbor: he is finally normal, there's no disfigurement to hold him back; but despite his appearence, he's still full of sadnesses and insecurities internally. The neighbor was a normal guy, had a beautiful gf, and still chose to go down that way. Now Guy, seeing how far he's gone and how little things have changed -- if anything changed for the worse, due to his life being practically replaced by someone who, years after, is ready to move on with the woman Guy's loved --, is perhaps approaching that final step that's been discussed throughout the film, and which the woman in black might symbolize: the end of it all.
I think the girl in the and is this girl 5:21 who Edward recognized and wanted. It means that he, unlike a classical monomyth, didn't change after a whole arch. Edwards still need acceptance and recognition from others. Sad.
I don’t know about this, one thing you seem to be ignoring is that Ingrid straight up claims that she INVENTED Edward. So guy revealing who he is isn’t really an option here. Because even if he CAN convince Ingrid that he was magically healed. Ingrid would then have to admit fault, that she stole a man’s life story and took credit for it, and why would she do that when it would be so easy for her to say that guy is crazy and that it isn’t true. If she is malicious enough to take credit for Edwards life, then I don’t doubt she would do this in order to succeed in play writing.
One thing I didn't understand was when ingrid drops the letter in front of his door she signs it C. Polazky or smth like that and later the same cat that Edward adopts is now with Ingrid and she gives him the same name and also the blind guy that lives next to her has a very similar sounding name to the cat. Idk just food for thought 😄.
I'm still confused... Maybe I just can't look passed the fact that the women in the movie are still conventionally attractive. Is it just me or does it kinda undermine the message?
Lucas, where do I begin You are just absolutely amazing What heavenly celestial body did you fall out of? I want to sincerely thank you for your insightful, intellectual, and interesting content!
Such a powerful film. I’d love to discuss your thoughts, and answer any remaining questions, lemme know below
Sebastian Stan's physical performance in this film is astonishing. Deserves substantial award consideration.
@@skeletalknight agree with every word, so good
I caught this movie tonight, I assumed the reason that he gets called Edward at the end was that at some point during the stabbing and him going to prison, they found out his true identity. I guess getting processed in the legal system would mean that he'd had to use his legal name. You might be right with your analysis though.
Yeah that’s totally a valid reason too! I often look so much more closely at the thematic side of things, so I’m super glad when people like you provide the more practical angle, I appreciate it!
They call him Guy in the restaurant. I Think the woman he saw, was that doctor in the beggining, who didn't like to look at him. Seems like he saw an oportunity to talk about everything. They asked him about himself. And he choosed to ignore her. And then OSwald tells him that he hasn't changed a bit.
I NEVER understood that image of the random woman at the end… until now. Thank you so much for this! Incredible video!
I was sooo confused about that woman for the longest time, so I’m glad I could offer a plausible interpretation for you and super pleased you enjoyed the video, thank you so much!!
Such a simple yet interesting topic to explore. So many people think that they would be happy, if only X happened. But time and time again be it relationships, money, recognition or, like here, looks, it always turns out that the only thing that can make you truly happy and fullfilled is your inner self.
Surprised the typewriter didn’t come up. I took it as the baggage we personally carry and need to let go of when everyone else is dismissive of it. Oswald and Ingrid don’t seem to care about it
I love how throughout this film you also realize how Edward/Guy real does make his life worse for himself. Hes boring, no confidence, he even changed his name to “Guy” because he had no other creativity besides that. Then we see Oswald, the absolute antithesis of his character. Wonderful performance by Pearson. He nailed this role, you want to so badly hate him but you realize he is far more confident than Edward/Guy ever was.
Your analysis of the film made me realize why I loved A Different Man. It's such a great movie involving identity and perspective with Sebastian Stan giving what I feel is one of his best performances yet. The physical performance he provided when he was playing as Edward is nothing short of astounding. Great video. :)
I don't know if it's "the message" or "the point" of this movie, but I really saw myself in Edward. The idea that if only things were different, if only I was more attractive, more successful, if only I could transform myself, life would be better - it's all a lie. At the end of the day, you're still you. People with a more confident, more positive outlook on life can find happiness, no matter their circumstances. And seeing a girl I like rejecting my advances but spending time with a guy who is just a different shade of me - that hits way too close.
What am I supposed to do with that? I don't know, but this movie made me feel things & I guess that's the point of art.
Also the scene at 2:40, the man tells him to go do Jiu Jitsu which Edward refuses. Oswald on the other hand was doing it which highlights Edward’s regret throughout the film of not being different personality wise before.
this is the type of explanation i want after a psychological film. amazing video. you just got a new subscriber
I don’t think Ingrid was ever in love with Edward - I think she thinks she owns the idea of him
During the scene where Ingrid leaves. There is an Easter egg of John merrick on tv. FYI. Elephant man. Also amazed at why no other video mentions David lynch elephant man
ok you might not believe me, but I caught this the first time in the theatre cuz Elephant Man is one of my favorite movies, and I realized that that shot of John Merrick was part of the "disfigurement at work" training video Ingrid and Edward were watching during that scene. I just forgot to talk about it in the video and noticed it again when I was editing, but I was so close to uploading, I figured it wasn't worth it to go back and record some audio on that reference because I also figured it was very highly likely someone would mention it in the comments, and here you are! So thank you! Elephant Man is a classic with a lot of very clear thematic parallels with this, I love both films dearly!
@@lucasblue20 lol it’s like a modern day non David lynch version. John merrick was definitely much worse off than Oswald and Edward tho. I had cacophobia and that movie and mask were in my life at a young age and nothing scared me but that. But I learned i was actually not afraid but afraid of my emotions to care for people like then. I can’t even watch wonder without tearing up….
@@lucasblue20 like I shy away extremely if I see someone that is disfigured badly. But it’s not because I think oooo get away from me. I am thinking how hard their life is and what they have gone through and I get extremely sad that I don’t like to deal with it. My niece had tumors as early as 2 years old. Miraculously she still alive. Can’t operate on a few because they are on or around spine/ brain so she is 25 but mentally 12
Yay! It posted truly loved your analysis of this movie. I would say the only thing that i would have loved your opinion on would also be the symbolism (if any) behind the typewriter and it continuously getting passed around. But i loved how you broke it up between perspective and identity. I also love how so on the nose they went wih Edward changing his name to "guy" where at one point of time he was so unique, and now he is just "some guy". But yes, loved this movie. Loved the dark witty humour throughout. Thank you for covering
Omg so glad you finally got to see this! And I was super pleased you and your partner loved it like I did. Honestly, I never picked up on the significance of the typewriter itself, besides the quote Edward typed that I mention in the video, it'd be interesting to see if any other viewers have some fresh ideas on it. And yes, totally, the particular choice of the name, Guy screams that Edward isn't being who he really is. And again, totally agree, this was one of the funniest movies of the year to me, it was so subtle and honest and self-deprecating and clever, super thrilled I finally got to share this and that you got to see it. Thank you so much!
I think in a sense the typewriter is an authentic expression of who Edward is - it produces the one scrap of true expression we see from him, but he doesn’t appreciate it and hands it off to Ingrid immediately. She doesn’t properly understand it (misremembering where he got it) and likes that it makes her ‘look’ like a writer. She then offers it to “Guy” later, and when asked where it came from, doesn’t tell him about Edward, but simply says it ‘looks Italian.’ She says he can have it, ‘give it a proper home.’ We see it again in Oswald’s apartment, where someone commented that it was cool and Oswald immediately offers it to them.
As far as we see, aside from Edward’s brief line, nobody uses this typewriter for its intended purpose or to create anything meaningful; they express interest in it as a statement piece and then easily hand it off at the first opportunity.
The color red appears in a lot of Edward’s clothing but phases out of “Guy”’s wardrobe, especially as he abandons his past identity. It’s also the color Ingrid paints Edward’s door, that is painted back over again when Oswald moves in.
In the same way the idea of Edward is passed around and exploited without any real understanding of the man, with no credit to the actual man himself, the typewriter is never used to write anything, but is aways on display, catching and losing interest as it is passed between anyone who takes notice of it, because nobody cares to keep it as more than a novelty item.
I think it’s also interesting to note that it was something that had some underused authenticity to Edward, but he gave it to Ingrid like it was worthless, and she immediately took the meaning of it and ran with it (“didn’t your mother give you this?”), but then she offers it back to “Guy” and he doesn’t accept it, so it goes to Oswald, who doesn’t have any attachment to it and happily gives it away.
Sorry if this is a little long and ramble-y - I just saw the movie for the first time yesterday and I was so blown away that I just stayed for the second showing and saw it again immediately. (The theater employees said I could lol)
Great video mate. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
One of the best video essays i've seen in a while! 10/10 movie too
8:50 - That's the guy he talks to about his liver pills being placebos. I think this is when he realizes that he can technically do whatever he wants now, because he's "a different man."
Just takes him too long to realize that he's the same old insecure self, on the inside.
Ohh damn, I didn't catch that. I think I'm starting to notice actors re-appearing in this film to play more than one minor role (or the same character seen in a completely different light) which either way totally serves to your point, thanks for this!
The movie is very Charlie's kaufmanish if its a thing i had the same feeling watching being john malkovich while watching this that feeling of helplessness which both protagonists feel
This is such a great analysis. I was so confused at the ending but this gave me all the clarity I need. ❤
thanks for this... I knew there was something more I couldn't grasped. You made me change my rating from 3.5 to 4.5. What a brilliant, complex, allegorical movie.
Currently watching this film because of your fantastic review!
Your description was really profound!!
This video is genius, the movie really reminds me of Dostoyevsky's novel "the double" , it's brilliant.
Great breakdown! Loved this film!
I havent seen Adrien Brody, but Stan deserves the Oscar. I am not joking. Hes brilliant
How did you annalize this movie? How many times did you have to see it? In my country is still on the cinema so I was wondering if you had to go a lot of times and take notes and research or what, just really wondering
2 things I’m almost sure about-goth he sees at the bar after transformation was the male nurse at the clinic when he was asking about placebos & meds. I also think single woman in last dinner scene was the same girl walking with his neighbor in park that committed suicide. I also feel like she was the same girl talking to guy at bar (director of movie)
Amazing analysis! Thank you for this video. I agree with you on everything, except on one thing. I have a slightly different theory about that woman from the ending scene.
She seems to also appear in the scene around the 41 minutes mark, where Edward has finished going through his transformation and is heading to the bar. As he's leaving his apartment and about to go downstairs, we see this woman in black, probably mourning clothes, standing in front of the apartment of the neighbour who killed himself. Edward looks at her briefly and then finally leaves.
Maybe my idea seems simplorious given her clothes, but I think that she represents death. Throughout the film we see several mentions to suicide. The neighbor does it; Ingrid asks Edward if he'd ever do it; when asked about what happened to Edward, Guy says he died that way; and in the play the suicide is discussed a few times as a possibility for Edward's character.
I feel like after his transformation Guy goes through the same thing as his neighbor: he is finally normal, there's no disfigurement to hold him back; but despite his appearence, he's still full of sadnesses and insecurities internally. The neighbor was a normal guy, had a beautiful gf, and still chose to go down that way. Now Guy, seeing how far he's gone and how little things have changed -- if anything changed for the worse, due to his life being practically replaced by someone who, years after, is ready to move on with the woman Guy's loved --, is perhaps approaching that final step that's been discussed throughout the film, and which the woman in black might symbolize: the end of it all.
Thanks for the breakdown. 👍
I think the girl in the and is this girl 5:21 who Edward recognized and wanted. It means that he, unlike a classical monomyth, didn't change after a whole arch. Edwards still need acceptance and recognition from others. Sad.
Great video
14:18 I think what you say here is what truly amuses me about this movie and gives new perspectives into self worth and self awareness
I don’t know about this, one thing you seem to be ignoring is that Ingrid straight up claims that she INVENTED Edward. So guy revealing who he is isn’t really an option here. Because even if he CAN convince Ingrid that he was magically healed. Ingrid would then have to admit fault, that she stole a man’s life story and took credit for it, and why would she do that when it would be so easy for her to say that guy is crazy and that it isn’t true. If she is malicious enough to take credit for Edwards life, then I don’t doubt she would do this in order to succeed in play writing.
One thing I didn't understand was when ingrid drops the letter in front of his door she signs it C. Polazky or smth like that and later the same cat that Edward adopts is now with Ingrid and she gives him the same name and also the blind guy that lives next to her has a very similar sounding name to the cat. Idk just food for thought 😄.
nice .thanks.
I'm still confused... Maybe I just can't look passed the fact that the women in the movie are still conventionally attractive. Is it just me or does it kinda undermine the message?
It's like The Substance movie for adults
I liked this movie. I wish people supported it more. The absurdity is what worked for the film.
wow.
It was a great movie!
oswald, despite everything, is a pain in the ass
Lucas, where do I begin
You are just absolutely amazing
What heavenly celestial body did you fall out of?
I want to sincerely thank you for your insightful, intellectual, and interesting content!
Absurd and pretentious. Even "the substance" is way better.
This feels like a weird vanilla sky with a really really low budget.
Acting is good tho.