Tories' 'batty' stamp duty plans explained | Property agent Henry Pryor

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
  • “Frankly you might as well stay in bed.”
    First time buyers will be considering “sitting on their hands” after the Conservatives plan the “batty idea” to raise the stamp duty threshold to £300,000, explains property agent Henry Pryor.
    📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
    📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
    🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
    📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @symbionet
    @symbionet หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    4 min in and they still haven’t explained clearly what is being proposed

    • @popcornfilms1
      @popcornfilms1 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Exactly

    • @shaunwarren8042
      @shaunwarren8042 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I think that is what they are complaining about, the Tories have said they are going to fiddle with stamp duty in October, without saying what they are going to do, hence anybody thinking of buying a property is going to wait and see in the hope of paying less stamp duty. So the market stalls.

    • @howhardcanitbe3333
      @howhardcanitbe3333 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Check the description, they're planning to raise the threshold for paying stamp duty to £300,000.

    • @ty194
      @ty194 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I thought I was going mad.

  • @maneshipocrates2264
    @maneshipocrates2264 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    The Tories showing how to lead - NOT!

  • @TimesFM4532
    @TimesFM4532 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    When the times calling the torys battly its bad

  • @billienomates1606
    @billienomates1606 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Tax, tax, tax what isn't taxed these days! and the country is still nearly £3 trillion plus in debt due to successive governments wasting hard earned tax payers money, whilst they fatten themselves up at the trough of public money.

    • @seanlander9321
      @seanlander9321 หลายเดือนก่อน

      France owes Treasury a trillion. Why not call that sovereign debt in or sell it?

    • @johnparr5879
      @johnparr5879 หลายเดือนก่อน

      CORRECT..... The foundation...... PROBLEM IS BASED IN....... WESTMINSTER CORRUPTED POLITICS..... FIX THIS AND THE SOVEREIGN NATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM...... BECOMES SUPER SUCCESSFUL..... FOR..... ALL.... LEGAL UK CITIZENS.

    • @Martin36544
      @Martin36544 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      When Labour left power in 2010 the national debt stood at £600 billion after the bank bailouts. The national debt is now 2.5 trillion! No two sides to this argument. It was 1.9 trillion before covid.

    • @johnparr5879
      @johnparr5879 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Martin36544 When you look to history, a pending economic.... Collapse....... Lays just behind major..... Military conflicts.... A way to.... Reboot..... Collapsing.... So called... World economics..... WAR destruction huge military EXPENDITURE, then after what ever conflict ends...... REBUILDING.... EXPENDITURE *. THE..... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...... BECAME A WORLD POWER AFTERC5 YEARS OF...... CONFLICTS..... BEFORE..... THE 2ND WORLD WAR...... .... HUGE ECONOMIC........ .. DEPRESSION *

    • @swanvictor887
      @swanvictor887 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so...why did you vote for them?

  • @robertduggan1958
    @robertduggan1958 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In 2020 Sunak played with the Stamp Duty to stimulate the Housing market it encouraged people to get Mortgages that they couldn’t really afford and when Interest Rates went up they lost their Houses it was a disaster last time why is he trying it again ?

  • @shaunwarren8042
    @shaunwarren8042 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Other than looking at getting people to pay capital gains tax on their primary residence, why don't we look at getting the wealthiest in the land to pay an appropriate amount of tax? We could start by maybe getting the King to pay inheritance tax and the appropriate capital gains on everything he owns

    • @ty194
      @ty194 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And what would that do for you?

    • @stevec6427
      @stevec6427 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ty194 If those who could pay more actually paid it then either our taxes could be cut or public services could be improved

    • @ty194
      @ty194 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@stevec6427 Neither of those things would happen.

  • @seanlander9321
    @seanlander9321 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It would be very much easier, and a relief for taxpayers, if parliament simply called in or sold the French loan. Not a penny paid on sovereign debt since 1931 and a trillion owing.

  • @robsengahay5614
    @robsengahay5614 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    CGT when selling your primary residence is a barmy idea in reality.
    Homeowners would be entitled to deduct a whole load of expenses they have incurred whilst owning the property specifically improvements but also repairs, redecorating, leasehold payments, house insurance premiums, legal fees, conveyancing costs etc. This will necessarily mean keeping detailed records of such expenses for the whole time the property is owned which might stretch back decades.
    Any profit would reasonably need to be index linked to some extent so the gross margin on sale would be diminished considerably. The expenses would also ned to be index linked based on the year in which they were incurred.
    So you would be hard pressed to make such a tax retrospective as you would need to enable people to understand the record keeping requirements going forward. There is a CGT threshold to cover also so the amount that would be received by the Exchequer would be vanishingly small in the first few years and less than you might envisage in the long run.
    Far more trouble than it is worth.

  • @chrisdavid7917
    @chrisdavid7917 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    the interview might make more sense if you tell use what changes you are talking about.

    • @ty194
      @ty194 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought I was the only one who wasn't getting it.

    • @genesis1765
      @genesis1765 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's like we were joining in a conversation which was going on.

  • @voice.of.reason
    @voice.of.reason หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you are a first time buyer and can afford to buy a £300,000 house then you are doing ok and you should be taxed, you need no help. This is good. Tax breaks for first time buyers should be axed totally

  • @saragonmcenany6229
    @saragonmcenany6229 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Autumn statement is November- no way this shower remains in power that long

    • @unlimited_pizza
      @unlimited_pizza หลายเดือนก่อน

      Of course they can. It's up to them when the election is called, so long as they call it before January.

  • @ednorton47
    @ednorton47 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The UK needs this extra revenue so that they can send the money to Ukraine and Israel.

  • @martinahardaker8739
    @martinahardaker8739 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Still don't know what these rules will be..

  • @carltontweedle5724
    @carltontweedle5724 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So stamp duty is a tax own a car road tax or motorbike , a home then council tax also. But vat on petrol diesel. The smoking ban where is the money going to come from with the lose of the tax on ciggies.

  • @Paul-qg3iw
    @Paul-qg3iw หลายเดือนก่อน

    They should up the stamp duty on second properties and so effectively stop (especially in London and SE Eng) new buy to lets coming into play.

  • @stephenswales8940
    @stephenswales8940 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's only the forewarning of lowering the Stamp Duty that causes a problem. If it was decided upon and implemented immediately it would not cause a delay on house sales and purchases. Simples!

  • @decoyfox
    @decoyfox หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is pointless, if stamp duty is in force then house sellers drop their price by a few grand, if not they raise their price by a few grand, zero benefit to anyone

  • @thecrankster
    @thecrankster หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very sensible comments from this gentleman

  • @chromatec4311
    @chromatec4311 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    So basically - he's against raising the threshold for stamp duty because it will increase house prices and since he buys property then it will cost him more. Oh dear - what a shame.

    • @laurentdrozin812
      @laurentdrozin812 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You do realize he is buying AND selling. The real problem here is for those who want to get into the housing market.

  • @SlackHoffman
    @SlackHoffman หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Youve totally glossed over the point in hand ……vague AF

  • @David-pt8ge
    @David-pt8ge หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Somebody tell him that haircut is a mess especially for a middle aged portly chap.

  • @CM73878
    @CM73878 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They keep tinkering with stamp duty which artificially increases demand and then people grumble about rising prices. Ludicrous. People need long term certainty without gimmicks.

  • @sarahbarrett1247
    @sarahbarrett1247 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Are they expecting us to waste sympathy on estate agents? It’s similar to 2009 when they wanted sympathy when the market crashed but we had to look at their slimy, smirking grins when they were making millions in the 15 years prior.

  • @ncooper8438
    @ncooper8438 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Tories are wishing for a return to the good old pre covid days of 2020 when base rate was zero, inflation was really low and house prices were soaring (due to stamp duty cut).

  • @Raazaaaaa
    @Raazaaaaa หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unless the FTB is hoping to buy a property more than £425k, it’s likely they’ll be more eager to buy ASAP before this change comes in place and the price of the same/similar properties increases (because there’s no stamp duty to pay - we saw something similar with the stamp duty holiday the tories gave themselves to buy up our assets during an international crisis, with minimal cost).

    • @unlimited_pizza
      @unlimited_pizza หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why if any changes are made it should be implemented quickly and permenant. No artificial deadlines which cause bubbles.

  • @mikedee171
    @mikedee171 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting guy.

  • @Black_swan_incoming
    @Black_swan_incoming หลายเดือนก่อน

    WEF batty ideas

  • @cupguin
    @cupguin หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait the Tories are suggesting a policy that benefits existing home owners over everyone else? Someone should alert the presses, I think I've figured out their scheme!

  • @MrTzimisces
    @MrTzimisces หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    House prices are going to go up, they will never come down. Especially when we just aren't building any new homes in any real substantial numbers

  • @danielhooper502
    @danielhooper502 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Do they even know how to spell homophobia?

  • @happychappy7115
    @happychappy7115 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Half a million immigrants arriving into the UK in this last year under the Tories. Guess what this means for house prices??😮😮

  • @hieroglyph321
    @hieroglyph321 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When even the Times are calling them out, you know the gig is up... Get the Tories out

  • @happychappy7115
    @happychappy7115 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wahey..more house price inflation ahead - just vote Tory!😊

  • @LondonarabS
    @LondonarabS หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Anybody still flying the Ukraine flag these days ?
    How much are we still sending to Ukraine when we have such disasters at home and more looming

  • @Lynn.hot.legs.peters
    @Lynn.hot.legs.peters หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Government hammers another nail in housing market coffin !