Discovered your videos a few days ago, and the only music that's been stuck in my head every since is "Flicker theoryyyy, with Tadas Viiinokuuuuur". But seriously, an excellent series!
No, that is not what Deleuze and Guattari are saying. This would imply that language merely re-presents something that pre-exists it, and that content and expression have a necessary relation. Their project argues for the exact opposite, namely that there is no direct, but only a relative, relation between content and expression.
Thank you for this! This was the hardest chapter for me so it's helpful to have somebody explain it.
Discovered your videos a few days ago, and the only music that's been stuck in my head every since is "Flicker theoryyyy, with Tadas Viiinokuuuuur". But seriously, an excellent series!
I love you so much this video made my day 😍😍 i hope your day if filled eith incredible ☀️
Do a video on MICROPOLITICS and segmentarity pretty please ❤❤❤ i loves your channel
thanks this was very useful. helped explain a few things i just didnt get for some reason.
dope. thx for your walking
i hope you see my point flow! ;)
WELL DONE
Are you Lithuanian?
yes! : )
@@TadasVinokuras geras! Aš ieškau Paul Ree "Origin of Moral Feelings" ir niekur neranduuuuu. Gal žinai is kur gauti?
Language and forms are the same things. Languages are sounds that represent something just like forms represent something.
you are so right.. can you elaborate further
No, that is not what Deleuze and Guattari are saying. This would imply that language merely re-presents something that pre-exists it, and that content and expression have a necessary relation. Their project argues for the exact opposite, namely that there is no direct, but only a relative, relation between content and expression.