Dr. Hugh Ross - The Science of Creation, Evening Lecture #3
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ย. 2024
- Dr. Hugh Ross teaches on the Science of Creation
Check out what else the Anchor House is up to at:
Instagram: @anchorhousekauai
Website: anchorhousekau...
Check out the Anchor House Podcast!
Instagram: @anchorhousepod
TH-cam: @AnchorHousePodcast
Great classes by Dr. Ross ! God and science without conflict, just perfect !
Except that Jesus spoke everything into existence in 6 days roughly 6,000 years ago.
@@statutesofthelord The new restored Earth and modern man yes. However, the age of Earth as a planet is probably much older than that. Maybe a lot has happened between Genesis 1:1 and the next line Genesis 1:2. We are still learning.......
@@fernandoben5605 fernando, Exodus 20:8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day [is] the sabbath of the LORD thy God: [in it] thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that [is] within thy gates:
11 For [in] six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them [is], and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
The next 7th day Sabbath starts at sundown on April 26, 2024. If you love Jesus, you will keep his commandments. Please do so.
I was glad to hear mention of fusion nuclear power . I also heard that this was taped in 2022 . In late 2023 , there was a break through in fusion energy where you can now get more out of it than you have to put into it ! It’s been a long time coming and I’m sure still needs some “fine tuning”, but we are here ! This is great news for humanity and I hope we can get this technology to market sooner rather than later .
aint gonna happen to any useful degree within the next 100 years
I don’t see or hear anything secular in this presentation. I hear a scientist who understands systems, systems that an eternal creator God would joyfully and patiently use for His glory. “Look at the birds of the air……”
It's sad that thus man claiming to be a Christian propagandizes the "SCIENTIFIC" mantra of billions of years when the bible makes crystal clear that our BEGINNING was a mere 6,000 years by the biblical timeline.
Make the most of mocking God in this short life we all get.
But don't forget eternity is FOR EVER.
I love the nick name Kent Hovind gives this man.
It fits well.
Hugh loss.!!!!!!!!
@@alanmcnaughton3628You side with Kent Hovind’s ad hominem over the calm arguments of someone who says humans have only been around for 9,000 or less years? I see what the bible meant about useless bickering.
the problem is the politicians want us to sacrifice but not them
The recommended ways of Hugh Ross, and others like yourself, make things possible if they get things past the polititians 1
Interesting men 😊😊😊
Huge Ross for president. For Nobel Price. And the world will prosper.
You will like the antichrist
I think you mean Nobel Prize or maybe not as there is no Nobel Prize for religion it's super natural and can not be proven
@truthgiver8286 that's right, origins is supernatural and the human practice of science doesn't go there, but heretic Hugh Ross insists on mixing naturalism with Genesis. He most likely ends up in hell for leading many people away from reliance on what God has declared, instead of whimsical human opinions about the past (which all involve extrapolation based arguments)
@@truthgiver8286 Ross has already proven the existence of God. RTB have a scientific Biblical model of creation that is testable, falsifiable and predictive of future scientific discovery just as every scientific model must..
@@SamytheGreek Oh wow! Tell me please how do you scientifically prove the supernatural. There is nothing testable.
As a Christian, I do think the Bible is the word of God, yet I struggle with the timeline for the creation of Adam and the existence of dinosaurs etc. It seems to me that the Bible does not explain everything, but when we find evidence from the past, the Bible stands firm. 🇬🇧✝️
Jesus spoke this world and everything in it into existence in 6 days, and rested the 7th. That was approximately 6,000 years ago.
@@statutesofthelordNobody can explain God. It's not possible. That is why he sent his son the Lord Jesus to tell us how to live, and repent or sins in his name, so we may enter Gods kingdom, ✝️🙄
Dinosaur is a term created in the 1800’s. The terms in the Bible are behemoth and leviathan. Dinosaurs didn’t die out 65 million years ago. They lived at the same time as humans. There are early drawings in South America showing humans riding on the backs of what appear to be a brontosaurus. Plus, a painting from the medieval times showing people riding on them as well. The term they used back then was dragons.
@@allenpayton1 if I try to explain this with links to the overlapping footprints, zapped goes my comment just like magic
@@statutesofthelord Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to?
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
I agree. Faith is enough, and enough is as good as a feast.
God made us and knows we see as through a glass darkly(I don't remember the exact phrasing of any of the translations, but WILL research it) and we have limits to what we can intellectually handle. If any of Dr. Ross's ideas have any truth, Jesus will explain it to us later on.
You might want to see Isa 43:5 and Prov 25:2 kjv
Did he present this before the Canadian wildfires happened? I certainly don’t disagree with the bulk of Dr. Ross’s evidence, but rain was not prevalent on Canada last year. I’m obviously a novice, just asking.
In the beginning
Maybe i haven't listened long enough yet, but I'd like to know what Dr. Ross has to say about nonsense the Dems are talking about.
Read the Book: Weathering Climate Change: A Fresh Approach by Hugh Ross.
@@djsarg7451 Climate change has been, is, and always be a fact. When you read about the effects of fossil fuel on the environment, read all of it, or at least recognize the fact that you haven't. Google and TH-cam learn what you seem to like, so it keeps feeding you more of the same. Dr. Ross is brilliant; reading his book is a great suggestion. Thanks.
Maybe think about these things as well: Windpower on the coasts are killing animal life. Our power grid cannot facilitate a more-electric approach to energy use...
And then there's a need to think about how both dems and reps have each had their pet projects and drives to draw in more money from the populus. Have you done any research on how much tax money is used for things other than what they were meant for. And tax laws and funding can be very tricky; some are written in such a way that allows the Gov to use the tax dollars for purposes that most of us would be shocked to find out. If you can believe what you saw with your own eyes, that Mr. Biden held a drag show on the White House lawn, then maybe you can believe that an orgy was funded with federal tax money on the East coast. Don't take my word for it; research.
Who engineered the basic process of thought
1:1 1:19 1:20 1:21
Ostriches need human social interaction to survive? Where did they get this type of social interaction in the wild that enabled them to survive the last couple hundred thousand years?
You make a valid point, but I believe Ross is speaking of domesticated Ostriches not the wild ones. I imagine there's quite a difference. A cucumber, once brined canned, and aged, is no longer a cucumber; it's a pickle.
Missed the point. Early mankind used Ostriches eggs as water bottles. Ostriches can be tamed. This is the point.
What does the genealogies in the Bible mean? While I love listening to these lectures it gives me pause. I am by no means a scientist and as I am listening questions arise in my head. God spoke everything into existence as the Bible teaches. Why would He use things such as asteroids and comets to create climate variations? Why would He wait millions of years to send His Son to redeem humanity? This sounds a lot like a secular world view to me but like I said, I'm not a scientist.
You don't need to be a scientist to understand the Bible. Men Like Hugh Ross is what makes it confusing. Believe the Bible not Mr. Ross.
God used physics to create this universe, not magic. Everything in this physical universe is created by God for reasons of His own, He doesn't keep it all secret. Genealogies? Look up Walter Kaiser, he the world's foremost expert on the subject, he can be seen with Dr. Ross debating Young Earth creationists on the Ankerburg show (on TH-cam)
@@SamytheGreek No matter how you twist or spin the genealogies in the Bible, you can't stretch them beyond thousands of years. Far short of the billions needed for any evolutionary processes to be a factor. God created the heaven and earth in six literal days. Science will never be able to explain that. Get over it.
@@SamytheGreek No, God did not use physics to create the universe. Read Genesis 1. Where are "physics" when God said "Let there be...." and spoke things into existance?
Physics attempts to explain how the creation works. God's power created it. The laws of how it works came about only after it was created.
God's power isn't magic. It's nothing like how magic is reported to work. Magic doesn't exist.
Explain to me what "physics" are being used when, while in Galilee, Jesus fed 5000 men starting with a few loaves of bread and fish, and made actual baked bread and whole fish appear from thin air in the basket so all were fed and more was left over than when the apostles began to feed the people. Mathew 14: 13-21
@@SamytheGreek The Christian is left to talk about rubbish among other believers because the sane don't bother wasting their time with ultimate questions, people reach a point, they don't ponder them.
If there were a god, then would there be any demand for scripture interpretations using fantasyland vocabulary? These are the wolves in sheep's clothing, we know them by their works: Jesus says faith is worthless if you can't move mountains by issuing verbal orders to one. Nothing fails like prayer in a children's hospital, & there is misinformation as if God does not have a perfect record of doing nothing, as if we had no reason for the saying: God helps those helping themselves.
why aren’t the governments educated in all this
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that more are educated to this information than we would guess, but knowledge is the booby prize, bc this information isn't profitable. Not profitable financially nor to those seeking power.
why isn’t india and china being forced into environmental
management practices
Depends on who you ask. If you ask those who are tied up in the woke nonsense, the answer to the China and India question would be: ...because that would be racist.
can gravity be produced
Yes. Bring up the topic of politics!
Only with lots of mass.
Climate change is the number one thing people want to talk about? lol
The last 9,500 years? Thats not biblical. The earth was formed only 6,000 years ago according to the genealogies in scripture.
Please read your whole Bible and not trust YEC.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to?
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
problem is the big company’s are greedy
or....maybe politicians lack proper values to fend off bribes and/or threats from greedy companies,
or...maybe it's just that humans are degenerate,
but... humans in society will always do better in a capitalistic economy under the umbrella of a Democratic-Republic.
You make yourselves look complete numpties by claiming the science of creation there is not one iota of science in creation it is totally supernatural. I'm pretty sure this makes you unfit to lecture anyone on anything with science in the title.
Amen brother truthgiver, praise the Lord, can I get an Amen.
@@SamytheGreek Which lord there are so many of them?
@@truthgiver8286 Yes, I know. If you are going to go about it scientifically you'd have to study all the holy books from all the different religions. The Jews and Muslims say that there is only one, the Hindus have thousands, if not millions, Mormons and Jehovah's witness have a different model. I myself like the Tri-une model where by its one God but He is three (paradox), where by He is "the Father, the "Son", and "Holy Spirit". Study them good, decide on which one concords with the best science and go from there. Of coarse there are some that believe that we all evolved from a single cell to humans in 3.8 billion years, I guest that can be considered a religion too.
@@SamytheGreek There is no science in religion it is supernatural. The best science for how we all got to where we are is evolution but evolution is not a religion. If you can come up with a better answer along with enough evidence then that would replace evolution in the science books for the simple reason that science is not pushing an agenda it is simply looking for the truth. we all thought the sun orbited the earth but Giordano Bruno proved that the earth orbited the sun the Roman Catholics burnt him alive for heresy but science shows he is right.
@@truthgiver8286 Romans also threw Christians to lions, crucified them etc. Religion showed that they were wrong.
Hugh Ross has a cute story that's it. He has a lot of non-Christian views. ✝️
You have no story.
@@jeffperkins1862 what
@@YECBIB i didnt stutter.
@@jeffperkins1862 Are you a whackadoodle?
I've only recently been introduced to the gentleman through TH-cam. May I ask you for an example of a non-Christian view he has? Serious question.
Ross plays a game, and pretends to exude humility and sincerity, but he is proud, puffed up and arrogant. He deludes himself, and thinks he is some kind of gnostic. He writes a book titled "Why the universe is the way it is". As though he has all the answers. Ross rejects the creation account, and contaminates scripture with Big Bang secular philosophies that directly contradict scripture. He rejects the global flood and says it was just a local flood, and believes there was death before Adam's sin.
He claims there were "pre-adamites". (people who supposedly lived before Adam). His faith is in Big Bang, and he has constructed a religious cult that conforms to it. Don't be so easily deceived, people...Gods word warns of these types in the last days.
With all respect, I think you are wrong.
The Bible is truth but the bible never claims that is scientific book. The bible has a different perspective, but not neccesarilly contradicts the science. In a sense the Bible answers questions like "why"...but the science answers question like "how".
Whatever is true God stablish in that way.
All the knowledge and intelligence came from God.
@@3MISARI0 Well, thank you for being respectful. Let me give a reply to some of your statements one at a time. You said:
#1. “ The Bible is truth but the bible never claims that is scientific book.”
Well, that’s a good thing, because science books are continually rewritten each year because they discover they were wrong. Gods word is God breathed (2nd Timothy 3:16) Just because the Bible is not specifically a science text book does not mean God lied to us when he said he created the physical universe in 6 days and rested for 1. Or when Gods told us the flood of Noah’s time covered the whole earth. Ross denies what God said, and perverts scripture and adds billions of years because he sees the Big Bang story as more authoritative than scripture. James 1:27 says we as believers are to keep from being contaminated by the world. Ross and others are very contaminated, and teach others to accept worldly contamination also.
#2. You said: In a sense the Bible answers questions like "why"...but the science answers question like "how".
The interpretation of things that occurred in the past cannot be validated with certainty, like our technology. All our technology is based on The Scientific Method. It is observable, testable, and the tests are repeatable under controlled conditions, giving the same result each time. That is real science. However, speculations about the past cannot be validated like real science. Also, scientists often have VERY different interpretations of evidence. Scientists are not infallible, and they very often come to very wrong conclusions about the past, especially those who do not adhere to a biblical worldview. In fact, The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed The Big Bang predictions about deep space were completely wrong. Yet, Christian Astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lyell made predictions of what the JWST would find from a biblical view of cosmology, and the biblical timeline. All his predictions, based on scripture were correct, while Big Bang predictions were totally wrong.
So, you see, Big Bang is not science. It is speculation that contradicts what God told us. The Bible says not to conform to this fallen world. And 2nd Corinthians 10:5 instructs us to destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God. Big Bang and evolution are 2 lofty speculations that have been raised against the knowledge of God. I hope you will consider this.
Also, If you want to know more about Ross, get the book Refuting Compromise: A biblical and scientific refutation of ‘progressive creationism’ (billions of years) as popularized by astronomer Hugh Ross by Dr Jonathan Sarfati.
YEC personal attacks. The Bible does not agree with YEC. Nature does not agree with YEC. So they always go to personal attacks. Hugh does not agree with YEC creation account as it is not in the Bible.
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today.
The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day has not ended. Thus day 7 is a long time span, thus day 1 to 6 must be a long time span. Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is:
Sunrise to sunset
Sunset to next sunset
Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ).
We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast.
Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains".
Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens”
The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours.
Have you entered into the 7th as Hebrews 4:9-10 asks you to?
Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
@@djsarg7451 Your elephant hurling statements are typical Ross like perversions of the truth. #1, I am a Biblical Creationist. My position on the earths age is determined through examining scripture. Unlike Ross, who places his faith in Big Bang then twists and perverts scripture to conform to it. Biblical Creationists examine the Bible’s genealogies In places like Genesis 5 and 11 to determine the earths age. We find that the evidence from Gods creation confirms scripture when correctly interpreted. By the way, The James Webb Space Telescope also confirmed Ross’s Big Bang religion is false. Pictures from deep space reveal fully formed galaxies and heavy elements, which contradicts Big Bang belief. However, Biblical Creationist astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lyle and others correctly predicted fully formed galaxies would be found based on what God has revealed in His word.
#2. What a deliberate misreading of Hebrews 4:9-10 ! Look at Exodus 20: 9 -10a -11 “Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is a sabbath of Yahweh you shall not do any work, 11 “For in six days Yahweh made the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day; therefore Yahweh blessed the sabbath day and made it holy.
THIS IS THE MODEL FOR OUR WORK WEEK ! From the very finger of God He tells us what He did, and how long He took to do it. Now, do you wish to argue that God was instructing us to work for 6 billion years, then rest for 1 billion ?
Ross perverts the Bible to accommodate his cult, and you have been deceived. If you want to know about Ross, get the book Refuting Compromise. A biblical and scientific refutation of ‘progressive creationism’ (billions of years) as popularized by astronomer Hugh Ross by Dr Jonathan Sarfati.
@@djsarg7451 Also, I find it funny that you say I am engaged in personal attacks when I point out the unbiblical views of Ross, but you apparently have no problem when Ross does personal attacks on great men like Archbishop James Ussher of Ireland, who in his book Annals of the World, placed the date of creation at 4004 BC. While it is not possible to know the specific year of creation, his scholarship was of the highest caliber, was detailed, and used scholarly sources that have since been lost. He certainly does not deserve ridicule. Other scholars, including Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, who accepted the Bible’s statements as accurate, have calculated dates for creation ranging from 3836 BC to 5501 BC, with most clustered around 4000 BC. If Ross is going to write books and do lectures claiming it was a local flood, not global, and the earth is actually billions of years old, and ridicules those who believe the Bible, then he set himself up for critical examination.
He talks alot about puny man's understanding of the universe ("science") and throws in a little Bible with a smooth tongue. Very Lucifer like
This lecture really makes a person go towards a secular world view for sure.
@loweeization absolutely...and some say he is helping spread the Gospel! Insane. I wouldn't let this clown anywhere near a Church (or really any public venue)
@@fzr1000981 Not a single thing he teaches is Biblical.
Would it help if threw in a "Hallelujah" or a "praise the Lord" once in a while, maybe a "can I get an Amen" and spoke with a redneck accent? I know, he could have called himself "Brother Billy Bob Dupray".
I'd be careful with the mockery if I were you. Read I Corinthians 1 chap 1 and 3 sometime. The eternal God - who spoke the universe into existence - never appeals to pitiful human understanding, He transcends it. Vast imaginary eons is the ongoing lie of atheists and this guy is just reselling their lies in a slick package.