Give me a break. Didn't we already go through this with Lance Armstrong? He never failed a drug test. Radcliffe is doped to her gills. Anyone with a passing knowledge of sports medicine knows this.
Remember, these are the same types of test that "proved" Lance Armstrong wasn't dopong. To this day, no IAAF test procedure has incriminated him either. As it stands, if Lance was judged by the same testing standards as Radcliffe, he'd be clean as a whistle. If Radcliffe were given he same treatment that "exposed" Lance, she'd be in prison.
Strange she has the same excuses Lance Armstrong used.
LOL
Give me a break. Didn't we already go through this with Lance Armstrong? He never failed a drug test. Radcliffe is doped to her gills. Anyone with a passing knowledge of sports medicine knows this.
SHE WAS DEFINATELY ON THE HOT SAUCE LOL
obtained how? since she was saying just today she would not release them to the press....
She obviously doped tho....
when she failed in 2004 olympics she started doping
mate she was doping way before that
Paula was a clean athlete
"I was training at altitude". Yea, and Lance was using a cream for saddle-sores...
Remember, these are the same types of test that "proved" Lance Armstrong wasn't dopong. To this day, no IAAF test procedure has incriminated him either. As it stands, if Lance was judged by the same testing standards as Radcliffe, he'd be clean as a whistle. If Radcliffe were given he same treatment that "exposed" Lance, she'd be in prison.
So the fact is she was on or exceeded limits. That's the fact.
what a load of bollocks. its tailored to dodge suspicion.
LMAO LOL
Criminally obtained data should be returned to its legal owner without examination or debate. The thief should be the one on trial.