Sigma 50mm F1.4 Art Lens: Is It Worth $950

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
  • froknowsphoto.c... ‎Click Here to see the full res images and download sample RAW Files.
    Since Sigma announced the 50mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Lens people have been toughing it as the sharpest thing since sliced bread, not that sliced bread is sharp. The major question in my mind is wether or not a 50mm lens is worth almost $1,000.
    The Nikon 50mm F1.4 clocks in at only $439 with the Canon F1.4 being $399. This new signma on the other hand is more than double the price of these other 50mm's. It really is hard to wrap your head around the price difference but is the quality there.
    As soon as AllensCamera.com got in their first copy they gave me a call to come in and unbox and sniff the lens. This is a mini review of sorts with sample images only, not real world shooting situations. As you know I like to really test my gear in the real world opposed to shooting charts and test images. In this case I set up some very simple shots which give me the ability to let you pixel peep all you would like at my files.
    First things first, this lens is built extremely well. It feels great in the hands and does not remind you of the lower end Sigma glass. Sigma has spent the last two years focusing on upping their game. Stepping up not just the quality of their products but the quality control.
    Simply holding on to and sniffing this lens gives you a sense of how well it is put together. It focuses smoothly, the buttons feel great and not flimsy and the glass looks solid.
    The simple tests I did prove how sharp this lens really is. It leaves you with very clean images almost wide open. I say almost wide open because at 1.4 it is very difficult to get tack sharp focus. Having such a shallow or narrow depth of field makes getting tack sharp images almost impossible.
    I have explained many times before that just because you have the ability to open up to 1.4 doesn't mean you should. I know you spent a lot of money to get that but where these lenses shine is at 2.2 to 2.8. They are so much sharper at 2.8 than any 2.8 on the market.
    My hope is to get a full on test unit in my hands and use it in the real world and not in a testing situation. But based off the quick tests I did and looking at the images this lens seems to be extremely sharp. Sharp is one thing but is it worth the price?
    It always comes down to can you afford it. If you can afford the price than by all means it's a fantastic lens. If you don't have the money to drop on it than I have absolutely no issue recommending the Nikon or Canon 1.4 for far less money.
    My plan in the future is to put this lens up against the Nikon 58 1.4 and the Canon 50 1.2. I know they are not the same focal lenses but I think it would be a fun little shoot out. I will also put it against the 50 1.4's from Nikon and Canon and see what we come up with.
    If you are looking to pick up any Sigma Lenses please check out AllensCamera.com. Allen has supported me and this website since day one. He is a mom and pop store that has been in business for over 30 years and wins on quality and customer service. Please give them a call for any NEW or USED camera gear from any manufacture.
    To connect with FroKnowsPhoto please follow below
    froknowsphoto.c... Check out the FroKnowsPhoto Flash Guide.
    froknowsphoto.c... FroKnowsPhoto Beginner Guide
    store.froknowsp...
    Facebook: / froknowsphoto
    Twitter : / froknowsphoto
    Google + : plus.google.co...
    Please Subscribe www.youtube.com...

ความคิดเห็น • 242

  • @JustinRobles13
    @JustinRobles13 8 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Does this guy shoot raw by any chance?

    • @mtbcarve
      @mtbcarve 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I think his shirt shoots raw.

    • @MasterWunderful
      @MasterWunderful หลายเดือนก่อน

      took me 8 years but I think so

  • @Juliapak
    @Juliapak 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I've had it for about a week now and can tell you it's amazing. I'm a canon gal who loves her L series lenses and to be quite frank with you I was skeptical of sigma. But you have to understand the sigma corporation has undergone a lot of changes over the past few years. They've really stepped up their game and introduced higher quality control measures. I was seriously going to buy the 50 mm f1.2, even though my experience with that lens seemed as if it were soft. But then I started hearing all this hype about sigma's new art lens so I checked in to the lab reports and looked at sample images. I mulled over the idea of buying sigma for a few days (again I'm a chick who loves her L glass) and decided to bite the bullet so to speak and get one. Must say I'm pretty impressed and glad I made the purchase. This lens is tact sharp and even faster auto focus speed the the f1.2, at least in my experience. I'm a night life photographer so fast autofocus makes my job that much easier.

    • @cizkoquevedo3613
      @cizkoquevedo3613 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      is it better than the 50mm 1.3 L series from cannon?

    • @Juliapak
      @Juliapak 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cizko Quevedo you mean the 50mm f1.2. And yes it is better. Sharper and the colours just "pop".

    • @cizkoquevedo3613
      @cizkoquevedo3613 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      yea i meant 1.2.... dang i wanna try that lens out now... I shoot on the Mark3 on a 50mm 1.2....

    • @Juliapak
      @Juliapak 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cizko Quevedo trust me it's awesome :)

  • @Ladywrip
    @Ladywrip 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    IDC what anyone says, I absolutely looooove your intro so please don't EVER, EVER, EVER change it?! And I mean that literally... EVER! Thanks for all you do, Jared!

  • @pokkitmonzturr
    @pokkitmonzturr 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nice to finally see another product review. You got carried away with current events and whatever else for a while.

  • @LoveLoveMeTricia
    @LoveLoveMeTricia 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I absolutely love that you said what you did at 5:30, Jared. So many people blame the lens when they can't get a crisp shot at 1.4 (and wider apertures). unless it's flat, it makes sense that your full subject won't be in focus, especially shooting a subject with multiple focal lengths, such as facial features. Lenses have a "sweet spot" a few clicks above their widest aperture for "tack sharp" images. This one's must be 2.8 :)

  • @sabyfoz538
    @sabyfoz538 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jared Polin, it is purple fringing I think, because when you shot the next photo it has a bit of green fringing. Purple fringing in the near background de-focused area and green fringing in the near foreground de-focused area

  • @BachPhotography
    @BachPhotography 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review. I am glad I got a sigma 50mm 1.4 art, its a great piece of kit

  • @buccnflvrfilms458
    @buccnflvrfilms458 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome review.... I shoot a lot of street dance videos... U reccomend this 50mm or the new 50-100mm art lens? I'm shooting with a canon 70d

  • @InVacuo
    @InVacuo 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Jared, hope you find the time to answer this, do you set up Lightroom any particular way to get such fast loading times? Sure your D4s has smaller files than my D800 but even so I think ~10s to load a photo is a bit much (plus more to zoom in 1:1). I think my PC should be fast enough I have a 3.2ghz hex core with 8gb ram and a RAID 0 HDD array.
    Thanks,
    Tom

  • @nicholasweedrik2576
    @nicholasweedrik2576 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I got this lens and it misses the focus very easily when taking landscape photos so when doing so it might be wise to double check that the focus ring is at Infiniti and not a bit before

  • @flowrider13roz
    @flowrider13roz 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey there! great videos!
    which camera and lenses should i get?
    a7s or 5diii?
    I shoot indoor sports (see my videos)!

    • @flowrider13roz
      @flowrider13roz 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      James Archer I'm doing photos for a tour and videos for myself.
      was thinking of getting the 35mm art lens vs 50mm art and the 25-105 4 art lens… for a setup with a 5d mark 3… Whatcha think?

  • @xKalown
    @xKalown 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm going to be honest. Most of his videos are completely irrelevant to any interests I have, but I just admire how he speaks and explains things. He's so great.

  • @iRawrh
    @iRawrh 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Bought a second hand Canon 50mm 1.8ii for $50! Im perfectly happy with it.

    • @SebastianDavidPB
      @SebastianDavidPB 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      pity Canon decided to skimp on quality on the updated lens when the MK1 had a metal mount and was less plastic and more fantastic.... nowadays they seem to make their cheaper lenses in China while holding up the ridiculous price tags for lenses that are the same quality as a chinese ramen noodle box. In case Canon fan boys will jump on me for this, I'm also a Canon owner and I can't stand the BS Canon sometimes throws at their own customers.

  • @muffemod
    @muffemod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:18 fluorescent tube lighting is one of the most flattering you can have. Why do you think retailers use it in their stores?!

  • @bgenevcius
    @bgenevcius 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I've been catching myself saying "fro knows photo" a couple times a day recently... think I've been watching this channel to much lol

    • @BruceLeroyUK
      @BruceLeroyUK 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bruno Genevcius lol.

  • @JohnMcConnell113
    @JohnMcConnell113 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    How is this even considered a review? You didn't even taste test it at all.

    • @JohnMcConnell113
      @JohnMcConnell113 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Martijn Frenks I'm taking it that the joke went over your head?

  • @robbyjai
    @robbyjai 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    your photo meta data suggest that the photos were taken with a nikon camera?? i was not aware that the sigmat 50mm F1.4 Art was available for the nikon mount yet ? I thought it was only Canon mount for now ???

  • @geneoplum
    @geneoplum 10 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    Gah that "Fro knows photo" thing you do is annoying as hell! its soooo lame!

    • @froknowsphoto
      @froknowsphoto  10 ปีที่แล้ว +98

      So what you are saying is I should do it more?

    • @geneoplum
      @geneoplum 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Jared Polin Probably get rid of it all together, so many people bagging you out on other photography channels such as DigitalRev. Seems to be the source of everyones annoyance.

    • @geneoplum
      @geneoplum 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Jared Polin Other than that i like watching your vids

    • @OTEP1234567891011
      @OTEP1234567891011 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      identacle
      Then skip it, or don't watch it at all, you fucking pleb.

    • @julesverne4629
      @julesverne4629 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      identacle I paid $100 + 13% Tax in Canadian Dollars for a New SMC PENTAX 50mm. F/1.4 SMC "Super Multi-Coated Lens from Pentax Co." better than any Sigma or Nikkor 50mm. F/1.4 Multi-Coated Lenses!!!! This is a Sigma 50mm. F/1.4 Lens Multi-Coated "NOT" any Superior "SMC Pentax Co. Super Multi-Coated 50 mm. F/1.4 Lens". This Sigma 50 mm. F/1.4 Lens although an extremely Fast-Lens is the Greatest "Rip-Off" of the 21st Century is ALL Japanese Optical Camera Engineers know that this Sigma 50 mm. Multi-Coated Lens can only be a maximum of "$100 Dollars U.S. + Taxes, thats it". Watch out People of the "Digital Camera Age, "Sigma" has become the Rip-Off BIG TIME Digital Camera Lens Age, this Lens is "NOT" worth any $950 U.S. Colossus-Price Tag maid for Millionaire-Idiots of the Ages. You can get a Tamron or any other Manufactured Nikkor, Canon or Pentax 50 mm. F/1.4 Multi-Coated Lens equal to this Rip-Off Sigma Lens in Performance++++ for only $100 Dollars New U.S. + Taxes and NOT another penny more!!!!!!

  • @HiroTaniguchi2
    @HiroTaniguchi2 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    do they sell the lenses that you've done sniff test and wind tunnel test?

  • @SebastianDavidPB
    @SebastianDavidPB 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the non art 50mm Sigma 1.4 EX DC HSM and have no problems with it, except landing some shots hand held at f1.4 and f1.8 (due to shaky hands)

  • @stevenwaldstein2249
    @stevenwaldstein2249 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Sigma 50mm ART is a retrofocus design that tries to achieve better performance than any dual gaussian design could achieve. I believe the Zeiss Otis takes a similar approach which currently is the gold standard. Thats what drives it size just like wide angle designs for a SLR. For those who think its too expensive for a normal lens may not think much of this focal length since it was the default kit lens for so long. Probably because a reasonably fast prime with a simple design was possible. I for one really enjoy this focal length and I'm willing to pay more to get a lens that performs at this focal length as other advanced designs due at 85mm, 135mm, 35mm or what ever. When you compare it to others that are best in class at their focal length its not overpriced. Whether you like length or not the weight while heavy is no more than other great lenses for the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II or 85mm f/1.2L II to pick two. So if it delivers as promised and is sharp as claimed it will be worth its cost. then its up to each one of us to decide to make the purchase or not.

  • @Stetch42
    @Stetch42 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this lens. Had it for Canon and now got it for Nikon. Wont leave the home without it.

  • @miguelmercedez7771
    @miguelmercedez7771 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT F STOP SHOULD I USE FOR LOW LIGHT?

  • @sorakun4363
    @sorakun4363 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would this be a good lease for newborn photography?

  • @chrisw7188
    @chrisw7188 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    do you buy all the gear you unbox? or does allens' let you unbox em?

  • @Enonymouse_
    @Enonymouse_ 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ive been talking to some of my fellow photogs in facebook groups and some of them say the sigma art lense after a thousand clicks is failing to focus properly and sigma is not sure why. They are having sigma swap out the electronics hoping it will fix the problem. (Owner commented that it was so bad that even AF correction was insufficient.)
    Hope this sheds some light on those that may be wondering about their build quality. I want a 85mm 1.4 that is sharp like this but doesn't cost 2500 dollars.. I do think the 50mm from Sigma is a good value.

  • @vkuri
    @vkuri 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi jared, why do you use Quick Books?

  • @ravigude
    @ravigude 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Jared, How does the image quality compare to nikon 85mm 1.4g or 58mm ?

  • @robertneill5511
    @robertneill5511 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been shooting with this lens since it came out... I've used it on several different bodies including the brand new D810. This lens really is a cut above the rest (with auto focus) It's fast, sharp, nice bokeh, and all the rest of the hype. However, it's also big and heavy and doesn't have weather sealing. I'll be keeping it for special occasions, but for my normal daily use I still grab my old tried and true 50mm f/1.4 AF-D on the D3s... I guess sometimes it just the way things feel.

  • @MitchPontjo
    @MitchPontjo 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jared Polin Is this lens also compatible with Nikon Full-Frame cameras?

  • @bowielow
    @bowielow 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I noticed that Lightroom couldn't recognise the make of this lens? I've also had this problem with my Nikon and Sigma lenses in which Lightroom doesn't display the make of the lens. Has this been a problem for you?

  • @jasonspannagel798
    @jasonspannagel798 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just bought a D7100 and a Tamron 70-200 from Allen's, and more specifically Brandon! Nice lens! I'll stick with my $200 50mm 1.8g for now...saving up for that 24-70 2.8! Keep the videos coming Fro! Good work!

  • @VideoArchiveGuy
    @VideoArchiveGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't forget to pay extra for the silly Sigma dock if you ever want to update the firmware.

  • @marcoricci5868
    @marcoricci5868 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Jared, a question: there's some kind of software plug in that leave all the sharp pixels as they are and makes every bokeh pixel more blured that they are?

  • @MatthewPuttCreative
    @MatthewPuttCreative 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Old Sigma 50mm 1.4 or Canon 50mm 1.4?

  • @Majed750
    @Majed750 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    !! Its very good, but why shooting with high ISO

  • @pgice
    @pgice 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    no
    for one reason
    it cant render colors accurate
    yellow tint all over the photos

  • @Freepepsi42
    @Freepepsi42 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you're looking for a portrait lens for a Full Frame body, go for the 85 1.8 AF-D or the 1.4 AF-G.

    • @joezuu
      @joezuu 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The 85 1.8 G is actually a pretty significant improvement over the old D version and I sold my 50 1.4 G and bought the 1.8 G due to the 1.4's slow focusing, bad fringing issues and terrible focus shifting at fast apertures. But then again, that could just be that I had a bad copy. Still, I found the 1.8 G to be just as sharp as the 1.4 @ 1.8.

  • @WhatAreYouBuyen
    @WhatAreYouBuyen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty sharp lense, but idk maybe in the future some more interesting photographs to look at? Lot of lens reviews with really boring subject matter for the "sharpness tests", would love to see some more interesting subject matter in the future man!

    • @HEROfrozt
      @HEROfrozt 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you still want to see photos taken with a Sigma Art 50mm then check my IG: Alexbastiansen
      I am a automotive photographer, and I have fallen in love with this lens

    • @Lostintheminddd
      @Lostintheminddd 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alexbastiansen good stuff

  • @armada1e
    @armada1e 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    the purple fringing was replaced with green fringing!

  • @chokdeefuku1702
    @chokdeefuku1702 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    how about the back front issue? with canon

  • @njrivetelite
    @njrivetelite 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep Us Posted on that, Maybe do a comparison of this one Vs the non ART version of Sigma's 50 1.4

  • @ShredWhiteandBlue
    @ShredWhiteandBlue 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like in the images of the guy at the store, the focus is on the left eye. Looked much sharper to me than the right.

  • @tannerhoke
    @tannerhoke 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    What are you shooting on to get that 1440 resolution?

    • @froknowsphoto
      @froknowsphoto  10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The D4s is shot at 1080 and I upscaled it since the screenflow portion is 1440. I rather upsize the 1080 than downsize the screenflow.

    • @telemaq76
      @telemaq76 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jared Polin it s cool to have 1440p videos

  • @beavertown2006
    @beavertown2006 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This lens is better value than the Nikon 58mm f1.4

  • @carter_tate
    @carter_tate 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the ART series is different from the Sigma Ex Dg Hsm???

  • @Leicaboss
    @Leicaboss 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    No weather sealing gasket on the back Jared Polin :(
    I'm sure it performs well though.

  • @luismiguelsilva9903
    @luismiguelsilva9903 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    how about to compare with a 300 dol. canon 1.4 ?

  • @lokatpic
    @lokatpic 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    We saw this at the Los Angeles Photo-Show. So sharp. Problem. It was not available.

  • @MarcusVisuals
    @MarcusVisuals 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I do Street photography / Portraits , What would you go with Sigma 50MM F1.4 Art or Sigma 35MM F1.4 Art for everyday use?

    • @Tatoru91
      @Tatoru91 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Marcus Sanchez idk if its ideal for street its heavy and massive

    • @majik11111
      @majik11111 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      35MM

  • @lingnaikee
    @lingnaikee 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    what does the sniff test have to do with a lens?!

  • @machia0705
    @machia0705 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CANON 50mm f1.8 , sweet at 125.00, even sweeter used at 50.00😎
    Or shoot manual and buy an old ROKKOR 58mm f1.2 for about 250.00. It’s bokeh is fabulous. Lens is tack sharp too.

  • @austinstanley_2510
    @austinstanley_2510 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    That 105 macro shot at the end though!

  • @roger767
    @roger767 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    any chance sigma will make f 1.8 or f 2.0 art lenses?

    • @solomonshv
      @solomonshv 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      zero chance. developing a lens cost a boat load of cash. have multiple production lines for lenses aiming at the same market puts a dent in the profit margin. the 50mm 1.4 art is cheap enough that it would compete with any 1.8 or 2.0 "art" lens they will make.
      if they were like canon and nikon and charged over $2000 for this thing, then there would be a point in making a cheaper lens for the lower price market. .

  • @qqqqhuz
    @qqqqhuz 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Such overexposure. Much professional

    • @Hirotoro4692
      @Hirotoro4692 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      A lot of people shoot slightly overexposed for editing purposes. It's pretty normal.

    • @qqqqhuz
      @qqqqhuz 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Will Davis What is it good for? When I take pictures, I usually go for underexposure

    • @Eric-ue5mm
      @Eric-ue5mm 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      And you are right to not over expose. Other guy has no clue...

    • @mtbcarve
      @mtbcarve 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      He probably over exposed to show everyone the sharpness.

    • @mtbcarve
      @mtbcarve 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll buy that for a dollar!

  • @brianminkc
    @brianminkc 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Jared.... would you buy this GREY market? I can save $300.

  • @saeedahmad3748
    @saeedahmad3748 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I use it with new sony A7 and A7r

  • @drethatbull
    @drethatbull 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHen are you doing a shooting tour?

  • @Rusty1995_
    @Rusty1995_ 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love these art lenses but im more then happy with my old sigma 50mm 1.4. Now if and when they make a new 85mm 1.4 ill be happy

  • @SyntheticFuture
    @SyntheticFuture 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I would buy something else. Got the Nikkor 50mm F1.8 and that is all the 50mm I need on my Nikon :)

    • @KiwiPokerPlayer
      @KiwiPokerPlayer 10 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Exactly... Nikon bodies are shit to start with so why waste money sprinkling glitter on them?

    • @llleolllolll
      @llleolllolll 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      KiwiPokerPlayer LOL

    • @MozgC
      @MozgC 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      KiwiPokerPlayer
      Lol, the 50 1N8G is a really good glass m8

    • @najsbajsmedmajs
      @najsbajsmedmajs 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      KiwiPokerPlayer Well, their image quality is really good, the best according to DxO mark.

    • @MrAppledude007
      @MrAppledude007 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      KiwiPokerPlayer We got a Canon fanboy over here

  • @sergegoluch3885
    @sergegoluch3885 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I shoot GIf with this lens. Sharp as hell.

  • @thepiecesfit5049
    @thepiecesfit5049 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Optics are good but the focus is a mess. Even with the dock sometimes very off. I think this is the only thing that makes me hesitant about buying Sigma again.

  • @sonnybrown4758
    @sonnybrown4758 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn't call checking out bokeh, pixel peeping. It's a totally legit thing to quality check on and not a nit picky thing.

  • @BenjaminRootPhoto
    @BenjaminRootPhoto 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    It looks like a pretty good lens. Not sure if it's worth $950 though.
    I noticed more chromatic aberration than I would like to see

  • @stephen_mangion
    @stephen_mangion 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    is this good for cropped sensor Cameras like the Nikon D7100

    • @Stetch42
      @Stetch42 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I had it for Canon 550D and 70D. And yes, I got fantastic images.

  • @bfareddawn
    @bfareddawn 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    great unboxing, great lens

  • @eatmelily
    @eatmelily 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Four years later, and I just picked the lens up new for 500. Hopefully it will prove a wise purchase...

  • @asadb1990
    @asadb1990 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    its not worth it considering the canon 50 1.4 is much cheaper at about 1/4 to 1/3 of the price.

  • @212lohs
    @212lohs 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You should pit it against the Zeiss Otis 50mm f/1,4 too!

  • @sachinsuryavanshi3
    @sachinsuryavanshi3 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey can I use this on dx cameras from nikon ?

  • @swedishmotorshow
    @swedishmotorshow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a brand new from a renowned Stockholm Photo Store 🏬 for $275 including a B+W 77mm UV filter.

  • @tonycool100
    @tonycool100 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't say "it's not camera's fault it's not the lens' fault," it can be, and actually quite often, especially with third party.

  • @Vamp898
    @Vamp898 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I somewhat doubt that an Anti-Aliased 16 Megapixel Bayer Filter is the best Sensor to test an Lense like this

  • @stephane1234567
    @stephane1234567 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't think I would spend much money for this lens, im satisfied so far with my 50 f/1.4 and the f/1.8 from canon. I'm saving money right now to afford a couple of profoto B1 xD.

  • @tedtedsen269
    @tedtedsen269 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it Worth the Money ? value is not always measured in money but how it renderer the image or how it performs that has more walue than the price for some photographers

  • @Alexandra-Rex
    @Alexandra-Rex 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bigger companies out there? AFAIK, Sigma is the biggest lens manufacturer in the world, and has been for a while.

    • @joezuu
      @joezuu 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think he meant "generally more reputable" in reference to Zeiss.

  • @trevorpinnocky
    @trevorpinnocky 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Comparing this lens to existing 1.4 offerings from Canon, Nikon, and Sigma is not even fair. It pretty much decimates all of them on all scientific measurements, chromatic aberration, light transmission, vignetting, distortion, and sharpness. On these fronts the Sigma is better in nearly all cases than the Nikon 50 1.4G, Nikon 50 1.8G, Nikon 58 1.4G, Canon 1.4, and the Canon 1.2L. It achieves nearly identical results in these tests to the Zeiss Otus 55 1.4 It is a newer optical formula and includes both low dispersion glass and aspherical glass. So, if you don’t need the benefits it offers don’t buy it. It’s as simple as that. But to suggest the current crop of 1.4 lenses are in the same league as this one is pretty misleading. It, along with the Zeiss 55mm break new ground in lens design. They are both amazing, period.

  • @4CamResMultiMedia
    @4CamResMultiMedia 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't like the "fro knows photos" that u say, it sounds really kiddy. and u don't sound professional. i always can't wait to for u to go on with what you want to say.

  • @mexicangamer4
    @mexicangamer4 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boka?

  • @killiancaldwell8748
    @killiancaldwell8748 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I miss videos with Allens in it D:

  • @shipleyshipster
    @shipleyshipster 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    "It doesn't feel like there is any plastic in this thing at all" *Plastic-like sound of lens cap falling on table* hahahaha

  • @snowskier4life
    @snowskier4life 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rather than spend $950 on this lens, I'd suggest going with Canon's 50mm 1.4 for $349 from B&H. I would love to see the longevity and durability of this lens. Is it REALLY worth this mammoth of a price?

  • @arkkhamful
    @arkkhamful 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do you keep smelling random things?

    • @MrNYCman530
      @MrNYCman530 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Must be a fetish of his.

  • @AnPrionsaBeag
    @AnPrionsaBeag 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sniff test? What next? Pee on it?

  • @njrivetelite
    @njrivetelite 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    LOL at the Bald creepy clerk staring at you and the camera

  • @csmorgan
    @csmorgan 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    No doubt sigmas are nice but canon glass holds its value so well I don't have a reason to go to third party lenses....just my $.02

    • @AminTheMystic
      @AminTheMystic 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't know what you are saying. This sigma is away and better than the Canon and Nikon in this range.

  • @MachineElf1111
    @MachineElf1111 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great review

  • @vinigonc
    @vinigonc 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Recorded in 1440p? Thats nice. hahaha

  • @vichtor
    @vichtor 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    what`s a JIF file :D

    • @DBLRedRibbon
      @DBLRedRibbon 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Viktor Sopko it's the peanut butter of files!

    • @sasca854
      @sasca854 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's how it is pronounced. www.cnn.com/2013/05/22/tech/web/pronounce-gif/index.html

  • @steamfox
    @steamfox 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok I'm really getting pissed off now.. For the past ~two months this channel has been stuffed on my face on every possible occasion while browsing YT. With almost every video I watch (completely unrelated to photography) one of these videos is recommended by TH-cam, as well as the whole channel every time YT has the chance to do so. What is going on??

  • @chingo3625
    @chingo3625 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sigma gets its problem with focusing, only 50% get its focus.

  • @TheRcEngineer
    @TheRcEngineer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    One shot with this lens and I saw the fringing so your test sucks, other than that this lens is awesome, other companies charge double for such a lens, it nearly beat the otus.

  • @can2ej6
    @can2ej6 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    950? with tax 1100 i can get a d7000 with an mf f 1.4 or af 1.4 maybe evan an f 1.2 if i look hard enough

  • @Innerlightuk
    @Innerlightuk 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent for APS-C sensors to give an equivalent f2.8 on a full frame sensor.

  • @zzelix
    @zzelix 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its not hiper-dermic needles, its hypodermic needles...

  • @tpsu129
    @tpsu129 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jared's worst nightmare is going bald. He has so much invested in his domain name.

  • @deanstockton6021
    @deanstockton6021 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    don't know if that includes tax Jarad but with UK tax and import you wouldn't get much change from £1000
    Wouldn't care if it could brew a cup of tea at that price it's not worth it.

  • @moviewatcher1024
    @moviewatcher1024 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Canon 50 1.4 is only $350 and this Sigma is $950? I think it is overpriced.

  • @SchneiderStudios
    @SchneiderStudios 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's wrong with the Sigma 30mm F1.4 Art lens? It's much cheaper - georiot.co/sigma30mmart Nothing. I own one and don't think the 50mm is any better.

    • @oasisbeyond
      @oasisbeyond 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Focus problems... Not worth the $600.

    • @yony120
      @yony120 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That one is for crop sensors only, and is not as optically awesome as the 35 1.4 Art or the 50 1.4 Art.

    • @SchneiderStudios
      @SchneiderStudios 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're wrong, check the link and see for yourself.

    • @Kengur8
      @Kengur8 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      SchneiderMan It is EF-S

    • @KaisuiSTFC
      @KaisuiSTFC 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only problem with the 30mm is that "it vignettes a lot in full frame cameras" ;)

  • @janusxx2
    @janusxx2 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope sigma gives you one of this lens for free with all the promos you're giving them.