SMCT: Send a Situation Report (SITREP)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @natebaron3124
    @natebaron3124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This is way more in depth than you will ever need in an actual field event, but at least you know how to do it “properly”

    • @rachard
      @rachard 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      man What are the ideal?

  • @ChrisWhite.fishing
    @ChrisWhite.fishing 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Finally a SITREP on TH-cam

  • @jackie520
    @jackie520 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I like how you updated the opfor. The uniforms remind me of north koreans.

  • @emmagarba1784
    @emmagarba1784 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very nice to see this

  • @donbrunkalla
    @donbrunkalla 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Question: Why use SITREP instead of SALUTE in the scenario provided?

    • @canadadelendaest8687
      @canadadelendaest8687 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A SALUTE would follow a 'Contact' report.

  • @matthewhard2951
    @matthewhard2951 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is not the SITREP (or anywhere near it) taught in the Soldier's manual of common tasks Warrior Skills lvl 1 - STP 21 1 SMCT

    • @CaesarCassius
      @CaesarCassius 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Hardcase LOL Yes it is:
      a. Line 1: Date and Time Group (DTG)-Report date and time the report is
      being submitted.
      b. Line 2: Unit-Identify the unit making the report.
      c. Line 3: From-Report the time that the operational situation started or
      will start.
      d. Line 4: Until-Report the time that the operational situation ends or will
      end.
      e. Line 5: Map-Give a minimum six digit grid of the squad or team current
      location.
      f. Line 6: Enemy-Report enemy activity.
      (1) Nationality.
      (2) Location.
      (3) Mission.
      (4) Time of Sighting.
      g. Line 7: Nonhostile-Report nonhostile activity.
      h. Line 8: Own-Report activities of own forces.
      (1) Changes in location of units and/or formations.
      (2) Activities of forces not attached to originating unit
      Source: STP 21-1-SMCT V9 7_31_15

    • @FivesArcTrooper
      @FivesArcTrooper ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CaesarCassius glookin

  • @chiphazzard8173
    @chiphazzard8173 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These graphics remind me of the old delta force computer games I played in base when I was a kid😂

  • @AidanCain
    @AidanCain 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Looks like you guys upgraded to VBS3. Looks good! Any chance some of the older drills will be updated?

    • @blub2121
      @blub2121 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Government PCs can run this? It looks like they still partly removed the detail/normal maps for fps gain (like in VBS2) but I'm surprised VBS3 apparently keeps the same high texture resolution and model complexity as ArmA3.

  • @boneyardmilitia3070
    @boneyardmilitia3070 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Knowledge is Power

  • @oloruntobaoluwadarewasiu8045
    @oloruntobaoluwadarewasiu8045 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Long life and prosperity

  • @melindas.grymes6734
    @melindas.grymes6734 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It doesn't get any more Army than that. I was all excited for this short, clear and concise video for a class I need to give but the information is outdated. Apparently between the SMCT published in 2017 and the one last published in Nov 2019, the format has changed. This was posted April 2019 and then 7 months later it changed.

    • @travisholt7561
      @travisholt7561 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah, I'd very much like an example of the newer one.

  • @Dutchfirehawk
    @Dutchfirehawk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damm good to know and learn this when playing Milsims

  • @drkushajagadeesh6347
    @drkushajagadeesh6347 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good topic, Sitrep. 💪

  • @sgtsnake13B
    @sgtsnake13B 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my recruiter jokingly told me to text him every monday giving a Sit Rep to check in with him before going to BCT, joke or not i might as well

  • @adrianwalton6162
    @adrianwalton6162 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    NO wonder the U.S. army can't get it right why is he sending a SITEING report for a SITREP......SITREP are send after contact to let HQ know the condition of the unit.....

  • @igornychaj7008
    @igornychaj7008 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @silkk_thecigarbrother
    @silkk_thecigarbrother 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice 👍🏽

  • @cfssdenhollander3535
    @cfssdenhollander3535 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Update 2022europa NAVO landen Rusland super EMI powervolt

  • @isaiahcarter9249
    @isaiahcarter9249 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know some of yall are here for BLC

    • @truefarce
      @truefarce 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Too bad this video is outdated now. So it's irrelevant information

    • @DirtyBeatzMusic
      @DirtyBeatzMusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yah brother the registry says different than this video

  • @IWLDELJ
    @IWLDELJ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish people would stop using patrol as a verb. A patrol is a mission detachment. You don't do a patrol. "Going on patrol" means being attached to a patrol, not doing a patrol. At this point, it doesn't matter, as languages adapt, but if we keep letting definitions slip all the time, then I think we lose some of the effectiveness of the language. But in this specific case, it specifically says in a relatively recent US Army FM that the word patrol isn't a verb, but a noun.