Grand Arbiter vs Tatyova vs Yidris vs Derevi | CEDH Gameplay

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 265

  • @eamonworden4369
    @eamonworden4369 3 ปีที่แล้ว +273

    PWP: the most powerful cards in the most powerful formats
    Also PWP: persistent petitioner

    • @GabetheFrog_
      @GabetheFrog_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      I mean, he did win tho

    • @Vagrantlol
      @Vagrantlol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@GabetheFrog_ the strongest deck seems to rarely win in this format as it's usually hated out pretty quickly

    • @andrewtetrick2244
      @andrewtetrick2244 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro I know. I was like, "wut"

    • @bradcallahan3546
      @bradcallahan3546 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah.. because every real cEDH game plays basic bitch mana ramp spells. 🤣

  • @Rekecko14
    @Rekecko14 3 ปีที่แล้ว +208

    Hey everybody, this is Reo the Grand Arbiter player. I love this deck and it was great to finally showcase it. I just wanted to mention and clarify a few things.
    Spoilers by the way.
    The reason Zack did not cast overloaded Cyclonic Rift is he didn't have enough mana when Grand Arbiter was out, also couldn't get blast zone to two counters while also tapping it for the effect before being milled out.
    I made this deck to show people a gimmicky deck like this can still be played at a cEDH table, and still have fun interactions while competing with the rest of the table.
    Hope you all enjoyed this, as I love showing this deck.

    • @VIOLITASZ
      @VIOLITASZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YOUR DECK IS AWESOME! Modern Mill player here hahah XD

    • @Millus1987
      @Millus1987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nice deck! I liked your prinny custom island

    • @adfinder5791
      @adfinder5791 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      next time use the stars (*) around the text to make it *bold for better spoiler warning*

    • @bobthehobo1236
      @bobthehobo1236 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Goat status

    • @johnbaird6752
      @johnbaird6752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Congrats man, that was spectacular! I thought that you wouldn't have a chance haha, shouldn't have doubted! Made my day seeing that cedh doesn't have to be all top tier optimized decks, niche strategies can win too

  • @seanmurphy3430
    @seanmurphy3430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Mental Misstepping a Sakura Tribe Scout only for your next opponent to play a Mystic Remora has got to feel pretty bad.

  • @StackedEDH
    @StackedEDH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Good game! Didn't expect that ending.

    • @gregb9452
      @gregb9452 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣😂🤣🤣🤣 yeah right. Dude can’t have any friends playing that 😅.

  • @cristianprado8559
    @cristianprado8559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Doesn't counter Vampiric Tutor
    counters Sakura
    2 Remoras enter the battlefield after that...
    yeah great Misstep there my man hahahah
    loved the ending. unluckily having the Nexus in hand I guess.
    love you guys ❤

    • @marcellopozzessere1656
      @marcellopozzessere1656 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep, super punished for that ahaha. I don't think that Tatyova list has Nexus, or he could have cast it the turn before (or at instant speed before drawing)

    • @cristianprado8559
      @cristianprado8559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@marcellopozzessere1656 you're right!
      but in the decklists they posted Nexus is there... oh well 🤷‍♂️
      edit: yep, it's was not in the deck
      I guess I clicked the moxfield list instead of checking the other one haha

    • @simonpark6889
      @simonpark6889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Having Mental Misstep in the beginning means that you can deny your opponents to ramp, often cast to counter Sol Ring or Mana Vault for example. Casting it to counter a creature that makes a land deck put more lands into play, ramping and also trigger his Commander makes sense. You almost never counter a tutor, you counter the piece they fetch, so the only time you counter a tutor is if you just have that situational based counter for just that cost or card type and the person is going of.

  • @fawksygrandpa9357
    @fawksygrandpa9357 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    i love seeing these games pop up in my youtube feed. great way to start the day

  • @cookiecreep9204
    @cookiecreep9204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You know the game will be quite something when a guy just casually accepts a hand with no lands.

  • @willpatterson3674
    @willpatterson3674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I saw the thumbnail and have never clicked on a video so quickly

  • @smack80
    @smack80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for enlarging Derevi, I now know that she does NOT HAVE A BEAK!!

  • @MrMischMasch1
    @MrMischMasch1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    We need a Rat Colony Deck next!

    • @zmonty011
      @zmonty011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      May I interest you in our Halloween Special from 2020? th-cam.com/video/FQmqehpbTYs/w-d-xo.html

  • @veldin4108
    @veldin4108 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! Always happy to see you pop up in my notifications ^^

  • @calebmullins3577
    @calebmullins3577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It seems like you always have a fun way of choosing who goes first, PLEASE include it on camera I think it would add a nice touch 🌼

  • @AppaTheBizon1228
    @AppaTheBizon1228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This game really shows that you can jank 'em out even in cEDH.
    That makes me think though; Have you guys thought about doing a more casual session? Like, commanders and cards/combos that don't really work at cEDH tables and stuff.

  • @therubyskeleton1002
    @therubyskeleton1002 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The intro NEVER gets old😍

  • @ElderDrunkenHighlander
    @ElderDrunkenHighlander 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Always love it when the jank deck takes it!

  • @justingolden21
    @justingolden21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those are the coolest playmats I've seen thus far

  • @OChecker
    @OChecker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    i just checked the decklists, how did Zack lose with a nexus of Fate in deck, or did i miss sth?

    • @apocalypticoreos6460
      @apocalypticoreos6460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maybe he drew it at the end with water logged grove

    • @OChecker
      @OChecker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@apocalypticoreos6460 even then it is still an instant and he can cast it on upkeep ^^

    • @alecpogson7585
      @alecpogson7585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But it woudnt do anything

    • @DerpyLaron
      @DerpyLaron 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@OChecker If he drew of grove he couldn't as he wouldn't have had enough mana wih grand arbiter out. He missplayed by drawing with grove if he didn't have it in hand or not playing it if he did have it in hand (which I doubt) .

    • @OChecker
      @OChecker 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DerpyLaron ah okay, I forgot to add the arbiter Mana ^^

  • @Frostgiantbutsmall
    @Frostgiantbutsmall 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Commenting before watching to help feed the algorithm. ❤️

  • @Drow333Grey
    @Drow333Grey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Reo just made Mill viable in cedh, so awesome!! Love this channel so much. Always great gameplay here👍🏼😁

  • @adfinder5791
    @adfinder5791 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love to see a game of Horde magic designed for cedh gameplay.

  • @fearphage
    @fearphage 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Blast Zone was just sitting there ready to answer the Petitioners.

  • @kamakazi339
    @kamakazi339 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a Grand Arbiter petitioners deck and it is almost completely different which is awesome

  • @Brumbo
    @Brumbo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A mill win? Ok...now this is pod racing!

  • @jdorffer
    @jdorffer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mill win is always the best win! Nice win Reo

  • @darkdragonXD1
    @darkdragonXD1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Im very simple man, I see Grand Arbiter I click.

    • @HouseyHouse
      @HouseyHouse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same for me only for Yidris

    • @ChefPharmD
      @ChefPharmD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same for me only Tatyova!!

    • @adams333
      @adams333 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same for me only for Derevi!

    • @jessejames9684
      @jessejames9684 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Korvold

  • @gambit2129
    @gambit2129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here for yidris and derevi, as I'm working hard to get mine solid! Thank you!

    • @gambit2129
      @gambit2129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oddly not how my derevi plays, and yidris with some control was super useful, just not enough. .

  • @NatNatNutmeg
    @NatNatNutmeg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Did you all know what the deck was before the game started?

  • @TheMcK777
    @TheMcK777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mill decks are like Miller Lites
    You enjoy it and/or love them if they're there and say you hate it when they're not

  • @blim8777
    @blim8777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Around 9:50 Reo shoul probably have tapped 4 of his advisors to mill Zack after the resolution of mistyc sanctuary but before the resolution of Tatyova's triggered ability. This way he probably would have saved the remora

  • @iqcool
    @iqcool 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am livid! Back around 2 years ago, when I got into Magic, and through playing Commander, my second deck I built was a deck around Grand Arbiter himself using Persistent Petitioners to mill my opponents. I built a cheaper, admittedly less interactive, version of this deck 2 years ago. I took it apart after a little while because people I played with understandably hated Grand Arbiter, but I kept all of the cards from that deck, including the 35 Petitioners, and have since built a Bruvac, the Grandiloquent deck with them instead. Love to see the Petitioners closing out a game like that! GG guys!

  • @addambarcelos
    @addambarcelos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God, that ending! So epic

  • @emmanuelarsenault-beaulieu1039
    @emmanuelarsenault-beaulieu1039 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello PWP! I was wondering if Ranar, the new UW commander with Foretell, could be a contender for cEDH. It's the first deck I've purchased to get into commander, and I can't wait to open it!

  • @Lonewanderer6666
    @Lonewanderer6666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Adam wins the world figure skating world championship, and gets to start us off"
    wait what?

  • @su0tin731
    @su0tin731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bringing a persistent petitioner deck to a PWP game where most decks have a self-mill win strategy built in seems really bold :D.

  • @nikos731
    @nikos731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Watching a cEDH game of someone wining with a mill Petitioners strategy while playing 0 ramp for the entire game was a pure delight.

  • @MrDevastator96
    @MrDevastator96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would love to see an Oops All Colorless! Commander game. Everyone choose a Colorless commander and builds off of that

    • @charleybrett1663
      @charleybrett1663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's pretty much impossible to build a competitive deck with no colours

    • @MrDevastator96
      @MrDevastator96 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charleybrett1663 anything is possible in the eyes of Emrakul :)

    • @charleybrett1663
      @charleybrett1663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrDevastator96 Emrakul has eyes?

    • @MrDevastator96
      @MrDevastator96 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charleybrett1663 anything is possible

    • @khurgar8120
      @khurgar8120 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@charleybrett1663 Zoom in on promised end and you will see a cat face ;)

  • @onnilattu9138
    @onnilattu9138 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ryan should have definitely tutored for Timetwister/Windfall turn 1.

  • @sintwelve
    @sintwelve 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You could say that was a persistent win.

  • @danielcarrillo4800
    @danielcarrillo4800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what a game, love your decks keep it up!!!

  • @jannicksturm9746
    @jannicksturm9746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    How about Blast Zone-ing the Petitioners?! o.O

    • @RabidHamster89
      @RabidHamster89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was thinking this. Zack could have added a counter the turn he played it then activated the turn before he got milled out.

    • @khurgar8120
      @khurgar8120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think it boils down to miscalculation. They had been playing a very interaction heavy game for 2 hours and Zack might just have forgotten to take GAAIV additional cost into account when he planned his future turn. Its not uncommon to start missing triggers and stax effects when you have been playing for a long time. Or he had some kind of information that we didnt have and decided to play in another manner, perhaps Reo said that he had disallow in the deck to counter the blast zone effect and Zack tried for another angle. Or perhaps it was just a misplay. Impossible to tell without more information.

  • @SolarBurn
    @SolarBurn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice! Watching now!

  • @crazykhespar8487
    @crazykhespar8487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    8:04 Misplay:
    Counterbalance has already revealed a pyroblast on top of Ryan's library. Using Derevi's CZ ability only costs an extra mana for no reason. Originally I thought it was to circumvent Remora, but that only triggers on non-creature spells.

    • @Godfather090807
      @Godfather090807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It costs 1 extra mana because of GA on the field so it wouldn't have mattered how it was brought to the field that turn

    • @crazykhespar8487
      @crazykhespar8487 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Godfather090807 Lmao this is true.

  • @OBZEDAT
    @OBZEDAT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Reo I love your deck! So clever.

  • @abrahamdrinkin2534
    @abrahamdrinkin2534 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you guys change the music on my account? If you did that’s so kind of you. This channel is my favorite for EDH content and fuels our play group for pushing decks to absolute 11 when we can

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We always take all feedback into consideration. If it was annoying you, there is a good chance it was annoying others who didn't comment.

  • @cortezmonaro2714
    @cortezmonaro2714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice game! Do you have a plans to continue budget cEDH series?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes we do! The next one is in the works, so stay tuned!

    • @cortezmonaro2714
      @cortezmonaro2714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PlayingWithPowerMTG Thanks, im already almost complete yuriko and godo from last episode))

  • @zcck7885
    @zcck7885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Around 12:10, when Zack casts Scapeshift, Field of the Dead should not have created 5 Zombies. By my count, Field of the Dead should have only made 2 Zombies because it only triggers at 7 or more lands with different names.
    Am I missing something here? Or should Zack have had 3 fewer Zombies?

    • @toddherink4234
      @toddherink4234 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought this too; what happened?

    • @NMS127
      @NMS127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Field triggers on any land entering if the condition is met. All the lands from Scapeshift enter at the same time, so the condition is met and they all trigger it.

    • @toddherink4234
      @toddherink4234 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If multiple lands enter the battlefield simultaneously, possibly including Field of the Dead itself, all of those lands are counted. For example, if you sacrifice eight lands while resolving Scapeshift and search your library for five different basic land cards, two Field of the Dead cards, and one other land card with a different name, you’ll create sixteen Zombie tokens.

    • @zcck7885
      @zcck7885 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome! Thank you for the explanation!

  • @RedShade1992
    @RedShade1992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    at the end zack had enough for cyclonic rift overloaded, and enough deck left to spare had reo responded by milling him so why didnt zack board wipe?

    • @InquisitorSinCross
      @InquisitorSinCross 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      GAAIV is increasing the cost of all opponent spells.

    • @ChanceDeath
      @ChanceDeath 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Zack needed 8 mana, he only had 7

    • @RedShade1992
      @RedShade1992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ChanceDeath but casting it for its overload cost is an alternate cost, i thought grand arbiter only looked at the primary cost of the spell

    • @nathanielmitchell1440
      @nathanielmitchell1440 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@RedShade1992 no. The card says "spells cost 1 more" so when you cast a spell it costs one more. No matter what. Even FOW costs 1 mana even if you pitch

  • @andreazampollo6726
    @andreazampollo6726 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For me, as a tatyova player, won Zack.

  • @kylemason8134
    @kylemason8134 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you include each player's hand count throughout the game? It's nice to know how many options players have.

  • @NickNames-x1m
    @NickNames-x1m 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow the mill deck pulled it off.

  • @hasakeyblade8306
    @hasakeyblade8306 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful game!
    Can i just ask, what is that background music sample? It's so epic, it just makes the games feel so powerful!

  • @ryanreagan5885
    @ryanreagan5885 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did I miss something where Zack didn't have enough mana to cast that Overloaded Cyclinic Rift w/ Biseju (uncounterable) to put all those Petitioners and GAAIV back into Reo's hand?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, because Grand Arbiter was out, making it cost 1 more.

  • @MassiveFoot29
    @MassiveFoot29 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I haven't seen it in the comments yet so excuse me if this has been said but Ryan lost his mana crypt flips 6 times in a row the chances of that happening are about 1/64 or about 1.56% all I can really say is ouch

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is actually a common affliction of Ryan. He loses his mana crypt triggers more than he wins them.

  • @justinveron698
    @justinveron698 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    WHAT A GAME!

  • @NightfallTH
    @NightfallTH 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good job

  • @captainvalen5429
    @captainvalen5429 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So I glad I got my Oboro for $18 lol it's around $75 ish now

  • @harithoney5691
    @harithoney5691 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't understand. At 13:47, Zach plays a blast zone. Why didn't he charge the blast zone and destroy all the petitioners instead of just losing the match?

  • @yoshiman9521
    @yoshiman9521 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i cant imagine getting remora over a wheel off of the initial vamp tutor and i dont understand why you would pick up cyclonic rift and not cast it

  • @Slack-3R
    @Slack-3R 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What was the point of getting cyclonic rift if you weren't going to use it?

    • @InquisitorSinCross
      @InquisitorSinCross 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dunno, maybe he miscalculated the cost of Cyclonic?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      GAAIV made it cost 1 more so he couldn't overload it.

    • @harithoney5691
      @harithoney5691 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PlayingWithPowerMTG Why didn't he charge and use his blast zone to kill all the petitioners?

  • @supremecourt4131
    @supremecourt4131 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i know this is 3 years old, but now you could even add Thassas Oracle

  • @letsflyfun
    @letsflyfun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did you guys take it easy on the GA mill deck? It kind of feels like not much attention was paid to him until it was too late.

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The table didn’t take it seriously. And they paid for it in the end...

  • @williescott5439
    @williescott5439 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great game!

  • @Litt1eFishy
    @Litt1eFishy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your channel.

  • @abdulazizalzeer4096
    @abdulazizalzeer4096 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ 8:16 how come Adam attacks with Spirit of the Labyrinth then uses Reconnaissance at the end of combat to untap it? Isn't Reconnaissance supposed to work on declaration before damage?

    • @zcck7885
      @zcck7885 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, it's legal. Look up the rulings on the card. Very strong.

  • @Vagrantlol
    @Vagrantlol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ryan is a lunatic, someone stop this madman

  • @JonathanHecht
    @JonathanHecht 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i underestimated the petitioners...

  • @jdcommander7026
    @jdcommander7026 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems like Zack should have made sure he could dredge instead of draw. He had the Life from the Loam still, right?

  • @KiddOracle
    @KiddOracle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Correct me if im wrong but didn't Zack have life form the loam in his graveyard which means he could've replaced his draw?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Part of the dredge is to put exactly three cards from your library into your graveyard. If you can't, you draw.

    • @KiddOracle
      @KiddOracle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PlayingWithPowerMTG Ah I see TY

    • @LC-wv7tz
      @LC-wv7tz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KiddOracle Yeah, but he had Nexus of Fate. His opponent gave him infinite turns by milling him out and he.... just didn't take it. Totally threw the game or a massive misplay on his part. Oh well. Shit happens, I guess. Reshuffling Nexus is like the whole point of that card tho.

  • @ariefb599
    @ariefb599 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Correct me if I’m wrong so you can active reconnaissance ability after dmg calculation ?

  • @taylorgates1385
    @taylorgates1385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I guess he forgot he could dredge his life from the loam?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can’t. If you don’t have cards in your library, you can’t dredge.

  • @Slapthatham
    @Slapthatham 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The blunder on not using blast zone ooooooof

  • @luukdentoom9614
    @luukdentoom9614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just a simple question:
    Why 'tatyov, benthic druid' over 'aesi, tyrant of gyre strait' as a commander?

    • @holmborn
      @holmborn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      cuz tatiyova is one less mana

    • @finalfantasyruler
      @finalfantasyruler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tatyova costs 1 less mana to cast and gains life which is more important than you would expect. The additional land drop isn’t worth the extra mana with all of the options available already.

    • @OChecker
      @OChecker 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I for myself love playing tatyova. i dont know Zacks reasons, but mine are: the extra landdrop doesnt matter too much on the card and 6 mana is so much harder to turbo out than 5. jeweled lotus plus 2 lands is tatyova turn 2 but not aesi

    • @DarkEinherjar
      @DarkEinherjar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      She costs one less mana and, considering how much life people end up paying in cEDH, the lifegain turns out to be more relevant than it looks.

    • @luukdentoom9614
      @luukdentoom9614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for all the reactions, i play windgrace myself and am aware of the 1 cmc difference. But thanks for the explanation of the extra landdrop not mattering and the explanation for the lifegain.

  • @zach3553
    @zach3553 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tatyova's Deck list had a Nexus of Fate in it....did they miss it when they were getting milled?

    • @zmonty011
      @zmonty011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The wrong deck list was posted, we will update it.

  • @hectormorales4090
    @hectormorales4090 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Spicy sauce!

  • @kraakelol
    @kraakelol ปีที่แล้ว

    Reconaissance untaps creatures that allready dealt damage? I’m probably dumb, but can someone explain?😊

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, because they are still considered attacking until the second main phase.

  • @pineapple123321
    @pineapple123321 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure PWP reads comments but as stated in other comments Zack couldn't lose to mill like this with Nexus of Fate in his deck.

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was a misnomer in the decklist. His list doesn't run Nexus of Fate.

  • @assael2
    @assael2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Adam Evil Adam from MTG mudstah? His deck look familiar

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not him, but every playgroup has their proverbial "Adam"

    • @adams333
      @adams333 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it made me smile when I saw an other "Adam" playing Derevi. I was hoping to see more of his deck in action though.

  • @vindorin
    @vindorin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So could Reo run Reconnaissance in his Petitioner deck? Or am I missing something?

    • @darkmagicpi
      @darkmagicpi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure it has white color identity. It doesn't combo for infinite mill or anything though as it removes the target *attacking* creature from combat.

  • @metalassmike
    @metalassmike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Class game

  • @IceForPvMGaming
    @IceForPvMGaming 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didnt zack have enough mana to overload rift after returning it? Wondering why he didn't cast it

    • @Asterios-r9s
      @Asterios-r9s 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it costs 8 from GAAIV

  • @danielkuttel7867
    @danielkuttel7867 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Persistent Petitioners feel like a needle the rules of commander. I hate this card and when one player is playing them, I try to set up all against that player. For me is the Persistent Petitioners the perfect card for people where doesn't want to build a good commander deck ;o)

  • @justaredux7137
    @justaredux7137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wait. Didn't he have a life from the loam in the graveyard? He could have dredged and replaced the draw.

    • @DarkEinherjar
      @DarkEinherjar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If you don't have enough cards to mill, you have to draw.
      Dredge's reminder text: "If you would draw a card, you may mill [X] cards instead. If you do, return this card from your graveyard to your hand."

    • @zach3553
      @zach3553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You need exactly 3 cards in library to dredge Life form the loam.

  • @smegmalasagna
    @smegmalasagna 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    11:40 Why wasn't Ryan able to block?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was, but it was lethal anyway, so he just accepted his fate.

  • @AndrewCangelose
    @AndrewCangelose 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Didn't zack have cyclonic rift in his hand?????

    • @DerpyLaron
      @DerpyLaron 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Grand Arbiter Made it cost 1 more and he only had 7 mana open. So he coudldn't cast it.

  • @williamstotzkowski148
    @williamstotzkowski148 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I knew who was going to win at the start because of the hashtags.
    That's like putting the movie twist in the trailers. C'mon.

  • @joeykewl4058
    @joeykewl4058 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    @6:43 how can the spirit deal damage and be untapped with reconnaissance? It strictly says, that the creature doesn´t deal damage

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Reconnaissance was created before the sixth edition rules changes, and when the combat phase was established. The card was errata'd to reflect this. You can activate Reconnaissance at the "end of combat" step to untap it and remove it from combat. That will not retroactively remove it's combat damage, because it has already been dealt in the previous combat step (combat damage step). I hope this makes sense! Thanks for the question!

    • @exsimon
      @exsimon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You activate reconnaissance after damage is dealt but before ending the combat phase. It's complex but it works like that

    • @sonofkvothe8313
      @sonofkvothe8313 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He untapped it in the End of Combat step, the Spirit has already dealt its damage and is untapped after that

    • @ottertvmtg6229
      @ottertvmtg6229 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you get priority before the combat damage step ends
      the creature is still attacking, and it already dealt damage
      thats when it gets untapped

    • @joeykewl4058
      @joeykewl4058 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PlayingWithPowerMTG Makes sense in a weird way ;)

  • @fmar528
    @fmar528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Has got to be the worst mental misstep anyone has ever seen

  • @calebmullins3577
    @calebmullins3577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Y'all telling me he pays you $100 every month and you didn't let him go first!? 😱

    • @calebmullins3577
      @calebmullins3577 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just kidding I love the content KEEP IT UP

  • @Spidermanfan937
    @Spidermanfan937 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not cast cyclonic rift towards the end of the game ?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      GAAIV made it cost 8, which he couldn't cast.

    • @Spidermanfan937
      @Spidermanfan937 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PlayingWithPowerMTG Fair enough . I figured he would’ve had enough with simic growth chamber and another forest to cast eternal witness .

  • @smegmalasagna
    @smegmalasagna 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    13:20 Wait so you'll get permanents that you own but don't control back when the player that controlled those permanents loses the game? I thought that they would go to your graveyard :p

    • @NMS127
      @NMS127 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If an effect is giving the player who leaves the game control of it, that effect ends and whoever would otherwise control it gets it back. If not (usually because it entered under the control of the player who's leaving), it's exiled.

  • @gundamassassin241
    @gundamassassin241 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 13:30 shouldnt tatiova go into exile since Adam died.

    • @DarkEinherjar
      @DarkEinherjar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No. That only happens if the player leaving the game cast the permanent or put it on the battlefield under their control to begin with.
      Since Tatyova was stolen, the control-changing effect simply ends and she returns to the previous controller.

    • @DarkEinherjar
      @DarkEinherjar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      800.4a. When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.

  • @flamingrock9978
    @flamingrock9978 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how did zack get his tatyova back after killing adam? when adam dies, all of his permanents should be exiled, so tatyova is supposed to come back to the command zone, and that would cost zack 7 mana of that turn to replay her.

    • @zach3553
      @zach3553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When Adam died, the control effect from gilded drake ended, so it reverts back to the owner.

    • @ruudvanlaarhoven5776
      @ruudvanlaarhoven5776 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Permanents that changed control go to their original controller when the current controller leaves the game. Permanents that entered the battlefield under an opponent's control (think Gonti or Fallen Shinobi) will be exiled when their controller leaves the game.

    • @DarkEinherjar
      @DarkEinherjar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      800.4a. When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.

    • @DarkEinherjar
      @DarkEinherjar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Permanents not owned by a player leaving the game are only exiled if that player cast the permanent or put it on the battlefield under their control to begin with.
      Since Tatyova was stolen, the control-changing effect simply ends and she returns to the previous controller.

  • @lucianorondeli107
    @lucianorondeli107 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alguém pode me explicar quais são as condições de vitória da tatyova?

    • @artist91fb
      @artist91fb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      probably some land synergy with field of the dead or some combos

  • @McGuffin5150
    @McGuffin5150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't Zack have dredged to avoid drawing and never lose from mill? He had a life from the loam in his bin, right?

    • @DMTim
      @DMTim 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      no. you cannot dredge if you have too few cards to dredge over

  • @gastonbello4290
    @gastonbello4290 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I feel bad for Ryan :(

  • @Bcdeano
    @Bcdeano 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow

  • @da6868
    @da6868 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    is this the same adam in mtg muddstah?

    • @PlayingWithPowerMTG
      @PlayingWithPowerMTG  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s not, but we would love to play with him sometime!

  • @larryrobinson2373
    @larryrobinson2373 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    derivi's ability triggers when a creature deals combat damage, when you activate reconnaissance it removes the creature from attack their for not dealing damage, so derivi's ability will not happen

    • @sphj3493
      @sphj3493 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Combat works in steps, there is the Declare attackers, declare blockers, damage, cleanup. So you can respond to the cleanup, after damage had been dealt

  • @andrewtetrick2244
    @andrewtetrick2244 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd love to play you all.

  • @vallisroyeaux4979
    @vallisroyeaux4979 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay I love this series, but I can’t be the only one who is losing his mind over how the music is the same every damn time.