If it doesn’t happen in museums, why does it in music?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2024
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 3

  • @davcaslop
    @davcaslop 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No, definitivamente no. Si bien es cierto que realizar interpretaciones lo más históricamente informados posible para acercarnos lo máximo posible a cómo podría haber sido en un pasado es algo interesante, toda la analogía es completamente falaz. Quizás con otro ejemplo podrías haber precisado más, pero con pinceles modernos y pintura sintética moderna un especialista puede hacer una reproducción del cuadro. En otras palabras, las partituras son instrucciones al igual que si Velázquez hubiera escrito trazo por trazo cómo recrear sus obras, pero en ningún momento cambia el estilo.
    Cambiar el estilo en música sería interpretar a Bach à la Jazz o algo así.

  • @cesarbravo6697
    @cesarbravo6697 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No me parece un símil adecuado. Los cuadros están pintados por la mano de quien los creó y así premanecen con la única alteración del tiempo y las restauraciones. La música se interpreta y reinterpreta desde el momento en el que se creó. Y en el proceso de interpretación intervienen el gusto del ejecutante, las expectativas del público, las cualidades acústicas de la sala, las características del instrumento que estás usando... En fin la pintura se crea pero la música se recrea. Me encantan las interpretaciones historicistas pero no creo que debamos denostar las demás.

  • @liloraynaud5853
    @liloraynaud5853 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hello,
    I'm sorry but I partly strongly disagree, of course it's interesting to play with period instruments and to put the music back in its original context but I don't think that as anything to do with respect towards the composer. Nobody can speak for the composers and say they would have felt disrespected if theyre music wasn't played on instruments that are alike what they had back then...And I believe (but that is just an opinion) that yes the composers had specific sounds in mind when writing but that's only because that's what they knew, and theyre music can't be limited to the quality of the tone they were thinking about. The rhythm, the harmony,the counterpoint, the expression, the dynamics, tactus and etc...are not the property of a specific kind of instrument and again this is just an opinion but I believe composers cared more about all those things (that we can all learn on modern instruments) and again they did with what they had at the time, doesn't mean theyre music is limited to those tones. That being said I fully agree that studying on period instruments is very resourceful, interesting, beautiful, as probably more historical interest ! But music is not only about history, and if we want to keep great composer's music truly alive we shouldn't try to divide the musician in "respectful ones" and "ignorant one" because the respect you have for the music goes far beyond the instrument you're using and even the way you're playing. Go tell Shafran playing Schubert that he's not respectful...it doesn't make any sense to me and since the deads doesn't speak, I don't see why we should do it for them.
    I really enjoy your playing and my comment as no intention to be aggressive whatsoever, I'm just reacting to those words :)
    I realized I focused a bit on the instruments and you where probably talking about aesthetic as much as the instruments, but again, to me there is room for every person that is trying to do something beautiful with the music, and I believe that there is better things to do for music in this world than being eachothers "judges of taste" !
    Have a good evening
    Keep up the good work 🌸