Top 5 Personal Flying Machine eVTOLs | Specs & Features
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- In this video, we’re sharing our list of the best personal flying machines currently in development, including some of their technical specs and features. These are eVTOLs that can accommodate only one pilot or passenger and are still in prototype stages. Watch until the end to see the most amazing aircraft on this list!
Until recently, the idea of flying cars remained a fantasy popularized in literary or cinematic fiction. Inventors and startups from all over the world had to look to the sky to offer any meaningful solution to traffic congestion problems. However, most cities lack the necessary space to accommodate vehicles that require runways, such as planes and jets. Innovations in vertical take-off and landing were needed for small flying machines to be practical and maneuverable. Nowadays, electric vertical take-off and landing technologies (eVTOLs) are becoming a big part of the future of aerospace mobility. The most noticeable benefit of these types of aircraft is the low operating cost, as they are considerably less expensive to buy, fuel, and maintain than conventional aircraft.
🛩️ If you enjoyed this episode, give us a LIKE, write a COMMENT, and SHARE the video!
🛩️ SUBSCRIBE and click the notification bell to get up-to-date with new uploads!
FOLLOW US:
/ aviationfederation
DONATE HERE:
www.buymeacoff...
OUR PLAYLIST:
• Top 5 Cheapest Private...
MORE VIDEOS:
Top 5 Air Taxi eVTOLs 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
• Top 5 Air Taxi eVTOLs ...
Top 3 Ultralight and Kit Helicopters Under $100K 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
• Top 3 Cheapest Ultrali...
Top 5 Ultralight and Kit Helicopters Over $100K 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
• Top 5 Most Expensive U...
EXTRA INFO:
Hover Scorpion
© Hoversurf
Aircraft Type: eVTOL hoverbike ultra-light
Piloting and Capacity: 1 passenger/pilot
Max Speed: 69 km/h (43 mph)
Max Altitude: 4.6 m (15 ft)
Max Range: 21 km (13 miles)
DragonAir Airboard 2
© DragonAir Aviation
Aircraft Type: eVTOL multi-copter
Piloting and Capacity: 1 passenger/pilot
Max Speed: 63 mph
Max Altitude: 3,000 m (10,000 ft)
Max Range: 40 miles (65 km)
Jetson One
© Jetson AB
Aircraft Type: eVTOL experimental ultralight (FAA Part 103)
Piloting and Capacity: 1 passenger/pilot
Max Speed: 102 km/h (63 mph)
Max Altitude: 3,200 m
Max Range: 60 miles (97 km)
Opener Blackfly v1
© Opener
Aircraft Type: eVTOL multi-copter
Piloting and Capacity: 1 passenger/pilot
Max Speed: 62 mph (99 kph)
Max Altitude: 3,500 m
Max Range: 60 miles (96 km)
Airbus Vahana
© Airbus S.a.S.
Aircraft Type: eVTOL multi-copter
Piloting and Capacity: 1 passenger/pilot
Max Speed: 120 mph (200 kph)
Max Altitude: 1,524 m (5,000 ft)
Max Range: 31 miles (50 km)
OTHER VIDEOS:
5 Best Personal Aircraft - Passenger Drones and Flying Cars ▶️ 1
• 5 Best Personal Aircra...
7 Real Flying Machines That Actually Fly
• 7 Real Flying Machines...
Why Personal Flying Machines Could Be the Future of Commuting
• Why Personal Flying Ma...
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed in our videos are our opinions and may not necessarily reflect those of the companies we feature.
Our content abides by the terms of Fair Use for education and commentary and the clips we feature in our editorials are owned by their respective copyright holders. The clips presented are for informational and non-commercial purposes only. For any business, media, or partnership inquiries, comment below or email: legal@emotionmedia.net
#PersonalFlyingMachine #eVTOL #PersonalFlyingDevice #AviationFederation
*Are you a fan of eVTOLs? Is there another personal flying machine that deserves to be on this list? To watch more interesting aircraft videos, check these out:*
Top 5 Air Taxi eVTOLs 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
th-cam.com/video/EXA6gQ2tchU/w-d-xo.html
Top 3 Ultralight and Kit Helicopters Under $100K 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
th-cam.com/video/I0f3ObofMDk/w-d-xo.html
Top 5 Ultralight and Kit Helicopters Over $100K 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
th-cam.com/video/Af7IO0Cw-fg/w-d-xo.html
Todo veiculo voador auto propulsado custa a partir de um milhão de dólares,então fod@-se
et lui de jedson. vous en parler pa sai le meilleure
Jetson ONE should be the TOP ONE in my opinion :)
You mean you don't like being perched right above spinning rotor blades? Some of these pilots are like onions waiting to be diced 😖😱😵
It look s the most practical and airworthy of them.
Yeah if number 4 don't include bikini girl 😏 Number 1 was the worst it's is a heavy helicopter that can't fly for over 50 km
Jetson is the way forward...
My only thought is that any design putting the passenger/controller up higher than the propellers is creating a higher center of gravity that will only make the machine more unstable and require extra effort to maintain stability. With the propellers higher, and the passenger lower, it drops the center of gravity and makes it more stable. It looks cool to make it look like a flying motorcycle, with the controller riding it like a bike, but it's a less efficient design.
all cool but need to bring the price way down and the range way up to make then worth while
Jetson except for the price point. Probably more and more builds coming in the future which should lower the price. Then the safety issue will rear its head and the feds will get involved. Then the price point goes up. Crowded skies ahead. I can see it now, texting while flying. LOL
Their flying time is 20 minutes. Not enough. Especially at their outrageous price point
Also the safety aspects are the biggest issue. Getting it to fly is easy.
The jetson actually has a parachute in case it loses power
@@toyotawitha20mm35 That will only be any good above a certain height. For me it's the torso height rotor blades in a crash that are really scary.
@@toyotawitha20mm35 parachute is only effective at a high altitude
Tilt Wing versions have a big disadvantage unfortunately.
I have built and tested many RC VTOL planes including tilt wing versions over 16 years. The
1960's tests already concluded their problems over 60 years ago ( including tail sitters)
Even light to moderate winds during a stationary hover attempt with a vertical
wing (like a boat sail) causes untold hassles with stability and using excess power just to maintain stationary and dangerously unstable with wind gusts.
A horizontal fixed wing VTOL with it's nose into the wind has little to no issue with wind gusts.
Tilt motor / props are ok, tilt wings are NOT. My
correct
It’s literally all regulated by a computer to hover and fly. You don’t have any issues hovering or flying. The computers even everything out for you. That’s the difference between the 60s and now.
I love these but the comment that they are "less expensive to buy" is far from true at this point. Maybe lower operational costs if they hold up. I'd still love one if I could afford it! Jetson One
...yeah the Jetson would be my pick as well!
@@marshallryan886 hi
Is this a "Weed Wacker" for trees. I might order one. What are your thoughts on night flying and powerlines?
Death. Anyone flying at nite at 500ft. better look at the VFR & Sectional chart or TAC minimums and NOTAM's
The future is today. Can't wait for official use.
The new Jetson One model is much improved and looks great. Anyone interested should check it out. The Airbus is impressive, but I have a nagging impression it will cost substantially more than all the other models here combined. But the new Jetson one seems more interesting than the models here.
I think the Jetson 1 is my fav. Problem is I'm a porker, so electric vtol flight is not in my future.
Jetson is simpler and more practical, I feel.
they never get tired of showing what the common man will never have.
They need more tilt wing designs and base them around aircraft that are perfectly balanced and able to glide land in case of power failure.
I hope I can buy one in the next few years.
They will then become fixed wind aircraft and require pilot's licenses to fly. Coming up with a better emergency device than a BP is a challenge, but life is short anyway!!
To be able to glide, you need a lot of wing, which take the design out of the "personal, out of my garage" type vehicle. I think the blades on all of these are also too short for auto-rotate like helicopters have. I think the best you can have at least in these personal size vehicle is an auto land when the battery gets low, or like some small planes have, a parachute (Cirris for example).
Yeah, guys - Jetson One is no longer 59,000 USD. Try 128,000...
It seems there has been a significant price change for the Jetson One. What factors do you think contributed to this increase, and how does it impact your perception of the aircraft's value?
Just give us the gas powered versions until batteries are significantly improved. The range of these things makes them completely impractical for anything but a novelty. Sure sure, fuss about the advantages of electric. Just do it down the road when it's practical.
These are just toys for the rich , most of these will be in the one hundred thousand pound range which put them into the top 20% of society , when 65% of the UK work forces only earns between 12,000 and 18,000 a year , there is no hope of ordinary people being able to afford them , a waist of time and resources, so much for the environment.
You sound just like all the people that walked around the Wright Bro’s first plane. Guess what? We can all afford a plane today. And they aren’t just toys.
@@mitchwolf5038 Yes, I just bought a plane from my local Lidl. It's a passenger plane that comes with disgruntled passengers so it was knocked down to £19.99...
There is a reason why they don't already exist... They are not like helicopters in that there is autorotation drag. No failure-mode planning death traps is all electric VTOL aircraft are.
As interesting as it would be to replace cars with these.....most people currently can barely drive a car.....now think of thousands of these with the same people controlling them......
Now that's some common sense.
I'm sixty-seven years old, and I'm still waiting for my jet pack. And my x-ray glasses to see through women's dresses.
But seriously, these things are made to burn through venture capital money. Good for them - it's their surplus money.
I hope the de elopement of these crafts will continue to the point that it is safe for everyone to use. A preprogrammed route could make it hands free, just set destination and it will take you there. Something that could avoid other vtol vehicles and ground obstacles the we can reduce car gridlock, in less time and heavy traffic and it will fun too to ride in one of these
As for personal use, all of these will be completely restricted to autopilot unless you're on private property or at the aerial equivalent of an off road park. Anywhere else and it's fully autonomous or flown by a licensed pilot according to faa guidelines.
But it can be used as a high reach weed whacker.
I'm a private pilot and I can tell you because the Jetson 1 is 190lbs. It's qualified as an ultralight so no pilot's license and follow ultralight VFR rules and your fine. Now once these start getting imported into the U. S., I can see the FAA re-classifying vtol's as a new type of aircraft type and once they change the type, all new rules can take shape and massive restrictions come with it. IMO
Wow I wonder if they will build one like the ones shown that will go between 200 and 300 mph and go and travel over 2 to 3 states befor refueling or need a charge now that would be great
I'm looking forward to the Lilium much more than any of these.
I was just seeing that in my reccomend yesterday haha
The Jetson One is the best in the whole entire world the jetson one suppose to be the top one
Future models imo will have the propellers shielded in a way that will increase the lift by rotating the insucked air around its axel and profiting from the upward pressure.. plus the cover might be lightweight overall disc shaped, again to produce lift when a vertical forward motion is present,this stuff is dangerous as hell imo with those blades open.. vtols might be monitored on some auto ai grid.. partially pre set to prevent collisions is my guess.. actually it will be a lot like a jetson cartoon type of thing is my idea.. auto balanced-powered .. some safety instalments incase of powerloss might be reasuring.. the final propelers will be different to is my guess .. more shaped like those vertical up flying toys where you pull a cord from the handle..
We just gonna gloss over the fact that the model flying the Dragonair Airboard over the lake was topless?
I'm absolutely excited about flying instead of driving. Can't wait to start using it ))
JetOne☆☆☆☆☆
something about having those blades underneath the pilot.....if the thing jerks for some reason or other and you fly off....you go right through the blades ! "yikes"
The newest design of the Jetson is awesome. I have ordered one, and look forward to its delivery. I am also happy there will be two dozen before me so their performance will have been extensively tested!! I would NEVER buy a Chinese product. Their consumer drones are mostly crap, risking your life on one is out of the question!!
How long before the names of the people who fly these start being added to the list of Darwin Award winners?
@@whiskeysudsjackwagon8510 they sold out to fake people. there will not be personal reviews by customers in 2022. he is making that up.
there here isn't even a video of a full flight or a video that isn't edited every 10 seconds. i don't believe they sold you one.
@@frankyflowers dude is bullshitting us like the pentagon, no point in buying these, I cant get across town before my batteries run out and the FAA wont let me land the damn thing anywhere
Can it fly higher than trees and houses? If not then streets are all that is avail to you to travel on and no one wants that.
The first flying car was made in the 1940s the second was in the 1950s....So wher did you get this is the first??????
5) 40 mins or less flight time, lands automatically when battery voltage is low, props below knee level, what could go wrong?
4) Same as number 5, flight times are bad, props at the bottom (Yea it'll never flip), no seat, long sticks to control flight ( I guess there're made from unbendable metal in case someone loses their balance?)
3) Well so far this seems like the safest one but, no mention of flight time or height it can go. I think the main problem would be it's a kit.
4) Too expensive, not enough flight time.
5) Why? 31 mile range, most likely well over $100k and a 200lb payload. So small people only need to buy.
I see no need to ever buy one of these if they ever come to market. I would prefer if these engineers/inventors would concentrate on using a small generator, esc and electric motors. You'd get a lot more range (hundreds of miles more range) and a little less expensive. Battery technology isn't here yet to be a reasonable choice for aircraft.
I remenber Jetsons Family from 70s now century 21 wonderful the future is today manufeturing on a larger scale please , price is douw , Vila Remo neighborhood São Paulo city Brazil South América
My favorite is the Blackfly.
That’s the coolest thing I’ve EVER seen!!!!! Been wanting to build one with my son before I go….our last build together hope to fly it before I go. Thanks so much for sharing. Take care best of luck stay safe stay healthy
All the best to you as well!
So many of these personal craft inspired by quadrocopters are extremely dangerous and would chop the rider into ribbons if there ever was an accident. They'd never be certified for safety.
I doubt very much that any of these will be viable at least until there is a breakthrough on battery energy density and weight. The only prospect for such batteries I see anytime in near terms is development of those based upon super light and energy dense Graphene. Lots of work in progress on such batteries. Of course, such batteries would be ripe for any number of uses, but critical to aircraft. The problem is that Graphene, while incredible capable of storing electric charge and weighs virtually nothing, releases it all at once and acts as a capacitor. Graphene is also enormously difficult to manufacture in bulk because it is one atom thick and must be applied to a substrate.
If you have batteries with, say, a couple thousand KWhs of charge with light weight under 100 lbs., then you have something that can stay airborne a decent time, unlike those mentioned here.
Problem is they cost 90,000 dollars, I think 7000- 15,000 is more fair because as of right now these are just big rc toys that you can drive.
That would never work out. propellers, Motors and escs alone are more than that for a drone this size.
Motors and the battery are more than $40,000 alone.
@@arctichorizons754 who knows one day the motors might be more affordable, I dont see who else other than a small majority of rich people are going to buy things like this, after all their motto is "anyone can be a pilot"
The first question not answered... Ask how many KWH are used to fly the rated 60 KM. Answer = "recreational use only".
Thw no.1 # has Good speed, craft designed good , too many propellers, and only distance 30 mile? Not enough mileage. Number 2 or 3 looks ready for sales.
Looking forward to the day when Honda and Polaris make and sell these . There will have to be a lot of regulations. No matter how well made the product is people will be killing themselves left and right. But I still want one!'😅
Cool as hell!! The biggest problem I see is idiots who barely can drive a car are going to buy them and parts will be raining down to the ground. Unless they become completely autonomous and you punch in a location and it goes there, most people aren’t ready for it. They are still working out the bugs in autonomous ground vehicles so hopefully they make people get a bunch of training before they get to fly because a bunch of idiots with more money than brains will buy them and they can’t even keep their high performance cars on the road!!😂
I have watched lots of these videos - they never have any sound? The vehicles use about 95% engine power just to compensate for gravity and are noisy! I have looked at the power to weight ratio of motor battery vehicles and they are extremely inefficient.
Humanity needs antigravity technologies and not this kind of toys! Maybe someone has that kind of technology, but the ordinary people can't a fort it. Documents stolen from Nikola Tesla contained a lot of formulas of free energy and antygraviti stuff.
Shouldn't we be focusing on spending less energy to move around, not more?
This power line powered passenger drone (a.k.a cable drone ) could be another alternative: th-cam.com/video/unKaU5FyDrw/w-d-xo.html
The V tol technoligy can be robosized by 5g much better then electric cars du,ll you can not bump into things in air must less. More space in all dimensions. So you can create a world sized covered network by membership and lower the costeds. So transportion more out of the private sphere into the public sphere is the future I think. Because les roads are needed and less input into the invirement.
To manufacturers: pls remember OPEN ROTORS AND LEGS DONT MIX WELL…
cost is going to be THE deal breaker with these, when they cost the same as a jetski and can fly for a couple of hours then they will be seen in the skies, the Airboard is probably the best of the bunch for costs, the expensive ones will never go into mass production, when Walmart starts selling them ill have one,
5 - хрень полнейшая, пошатнулся, повернулся, оступился - фарш.
4 - у дефки радости полные штаны когда ей удается приземлится. Что-то с концепцией явно не так.
3-1 наиболее интересные концепции.
#1 too small a payload. And 120mph still 60mile range begs to be a twin passenger ie P-38 dual cotrol and or load cargo logistic stealth marine seal transport.
Con il sole e con il vento viaggerò in eterno. . . dal momento che consumo energia elettrica per viaggiare perché non recuperarne un po' utilizzando un mini o micro generatore eolico, ad asse verticale, posto esternamente da qualche parte dell'automobile e un sistema di pannelli solari? Questi sistemi erogheranno energia . . per sempre.(Mi spiego: un oggetto che si muove, come un'auto, creerà un vortice nell'aria, il vento. Il quale impattandosi con la turbina eolica genererà elettricità che ricaricherà le batterie).
Need a personal EVTOL craft w/ 300 lb payload plus pilot, w/ floats for lake access to 50 miles.
Yes because standing or sitting right above a human blender instills tones of confidence in most people. Simply these are for fun only with $70k price tags or the like and well it's not worth it. For these to work they need one to three hours flight time, emergency power, charge at tesla power stations, fit in a parking space, carry 300 pounds or more so you can actually put stuff in the thing and use it to go shopping and the like. Closed cockpit for safety, emergency parachute, impact seat, crumple zones. landing gear and or rollers to maneuver on ground if need be.
That's a long list of requirements, but I also agree with those.
These are all fantastic machines and the idea of air cars has been around for many years but I think it would be totally unworkable. The fact is that there are simply too many people who can barely cope with driving in 2 dimensions. Add a third dimension and there will be bodies falling out of the skies all day long.
In my uneducated opinion is it not bad having all the blades open where hands, arms, hair can get caught? Surely they could have the blades enclosed somehow?
Jetson!
4:10 GUY: I'm going to dress as safely as I can trying to test fly this thing!
WOMAN : Im going to get as naked as I can! This is going on my Instagram ASAP
The Jetson One is by far the best looking of the ones presented here.
Not according to the stats. Yes it is pretty, but there are better ones according to the stats
Is there a car that be driven on land, fly and go underwater? I know Rinspeed sQuba can drive on land and underwater and many cars that can drive on land and fly but never all 3.
Where can you go in twenty minutes? Then it will take you four hours to come back because you have to charge the batteries. Forget this.
I don't like the exposed propellers for domestic use - must be dangerous, the Jetson looks better ...
I never want tobe that close to a human blender. Ffs their is a better design that doesn't expose so much blad...
Ah, finally we can annoy people stuck in trafic by flying above then for 10 minutes
its all good proof of concept stuff, but not at all practical until there's a huge leap forward in battery life and cargo weight capacity.
these apparently weren't made for americans, if they can only carry 200 pounds :D
2:14..... i think a rotor would shop his leg off. why in the fuck is the standing there? i bet these things are BS!
Love these vehicles! Research will only bring better results in the future and I am actually very excited about this more than ev cars.
I have no use of my legs is any one developing a handi cap one that seats two like a car. I case I move to Floria I want a better way to escape the hurricanes
Would I still need EZ PASS to go from Jersey to New York City?
I want add a cigar shaped helium overhead baloon to thes evtols. They had this concept in the ancient past in France
Such invations. Still using propellers! ROFL!
We should be further than what you just showed me Is satellite guidant system Would be a great start
Thanks Sophia . What are you going to close the year of 2022 with for us?
Ready for the disc shaped helium ring. And one litre of helium per gram.
Great future when lighter an more efficient battery’s deco e available
Oh, what a great time to be young. Yes, my grandsons are going to have a ball.
Dont see spending that much money on a vehicle that can only travel such short distances at one time.
I can only think about flocks of birds, because the altitude is so low.
The Jetson One is by far the best looking of the ones presented here.
How long before we see unlimited Racing ! Like Reno air races.
I've got to say for 65 thousand dollars I could have a very comfortable pickup truck that would take me 600 miles on a tank of gas. When these little flying machines can do that I'll think about it.
Its not for you. its a toy for the rich
The Jetson one will be the next car with some upgrades...
fuck i discover my next rabbit hole...
5. Scorpion = top heavy bad design.
4. Dragonair = another top heavy design with ugly asthetics.
3. Jetson One = a little small and cramped.
2. Blackfly = poorest visibility for pilot.
1. Vahana = not going anywhere too bulky and not suitable for average people.
Great feedback, actually. Thanks for sharing them here!
yes but the blades are so dangerusly close that you can get your legs caca
11
Someone will get hurt with those blades exposed as they are.
so the number 1 pick is a discontinued model? -_-
Il faut qu!I'll y est une solution,est ce qu!on veut changer le monde on le detruire ces gens n!don't pas de cœurs.
Most are built so if a rotor lets go your either dead of severely injured.
hmmm....Why does this video seem like its animated drones?
You failed to discuss the payload weight limit.
Some Russian mathematician calculated the speed of of a UFO, which a drone accidentally recorded, as 3600 km/hour,& presented the entire thing in You tube,that too without any noise from the alien craft, when we achieve this type of tech.?
Interesting piece of info!
If you like riding under a meat grinder! Be my guess! Not me
I like them all, but the Jetson's price of $56,000, is way too much. A car, which has more mechanical and electrical parts, can be had for less. Not many will buy at that price. With a much lower price point, they can push those things out on assembly line.
Too bad its 59k dollars.😂😂😂😂
You can't fly a car, I think at this stage these thing's are just toy's for the rich boys, you know the kind I mean pay a £100K for a watch or £30K on some silly trainers. As for price on the Jetson, she's got it wrong on price it's $92K as a kit to build yourself & if you want them to build it's another $22K on top. As for selling the 1st 15 have sold & 1st 12 delivered in 2022 (sold out) so year wait at least, I presume chassis 13 to 24 will be delivered in 2023.
Last I heard it was $90,000! And only 50% built.
Lol, this is a flying vehicle. It's not a car. Of course it's going to be more expensive and not as practical. Horse owners were saying the same thing 100 years ago.
The jetson is 92k not 56k
If I had any of those I would be beyond treetop level
you have to be skinny and rich to buy it and fly it
I have drone motors for only $200
If one motor fails, will it drop out of the sky?
That is really neat! but wait till a few people get shredded up in those props. I think anti gravity is the way we are going in the near future. Powered by ZED's.
I would really love it if they made these things and to fly from New York to Montreal on one charge
I don’t see why anyone hasn’t constructed a DJI drone type operation instead of the camera hanging underneath a chair with the controllers nobody’s done that yet
The idea of using a DJI drone-like operation for aerial videography or photography is an interesting and creative concept. However, there will be plenty of practical challenges and safety considerations to take into account.