Bishop Athanasius Schneider Credo Catechism: Episode #1: "On Christian Doctrine."
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- Credo Catechism: sophiainstitut...
How to pray the Rosary: traditionalcat......
Standard Links:
To be a Traditional Catholic, means to embrace and follow the Traditions of our Forefathers. Traditional Catholics must go exclusively to the Tridentine mass (not barring good eastern rites), and in charity and humility and without bitterness protest and resist the liturgical novelties and ruptures of the 1970 Missal (The New Mass).
Find a Latin Mass: sspx.org/en/co...
theliturgy.org...
www.latinmassd...
For viewers outside the US who need to find a Latin Mass: fsspx.org/en/c...
For UK viewers: lms.org.uk/mas...
* Note on Latin Mass attendance: I personally recommend you find an SSPX chapel if it is available, that way the preaching you will get will be guaranteed to be orthodox. If there is not an SSPX chapel near you, please go to your closest Latin Mass, just be aware that sometimes (not all the time), the preaching could have questionable elements due to the modern seminary training.
If there is not a Latin Mass near you, please find and Eastern Catholic (be cautious about certain rites) or Ordinariate near you.
Best Copy of the Summa Theologica By St. Thomas Aquinas:aquinas101.tho...
Thank you for doing this series. In all humility you are amazing!! I love your fire and devotion to God and the way the Holy Spirit inspires you. ❤️🙏
You truly have a gift to explain the faith in a understandable way. Thanks it is needed!
This is simply wonderful. Traditional Thomast you are the best young Catechist out there. The Church needs you! Go out and TEACH ❤
LOVE THIS SERIES! I’m sharing this with others. AMAZING!
The more I think of being devoted to Christ, the more I think about His Mother.
@@tony1685 You prove nothing by quoting verses and providing zero context nor that you understand the Scripture which you are referencing. Tell me, what verse tells you what books are to make up Scripture?
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I am so grateful for this teaching.
God bless your work young Thomist+ St. Pius X, AB M. LeFebvre, & St. Athanasius intercede for you+
Benedicamus Domino +
I was in Austin at Latin Mass and enjoyed seeing you serving. Enjoy your site. God bless you.
Great work!
Thanks so much for this. Very much needed.
Thank you so much! Ave Maria!
Excellent again brother. Thank u. Your brother in Christ from belgium
Great work on this show, and on MoC and AB!
Thank you so much! Ave Maria!
Just ordered the book Credo! Thank you young man for your recommendation ❤️🙏🏻
Wonderful, thank you Nick and Christ keep you.
Myles Maloney, Edmonton, Canada
Thank you sir! Ave Maria!
Thanks a lot brother, from a lover of the Doctor Communis as a prelude to a clear mind by The Grace of our Lord and God. Very well
Appreciated what you do by shining a light in dark times. 👍🙏 Viva Cristo Rey!
Thank you for watching! Ave Maria!
Credo, a Compendium of the Catholic Faith, Part I, Section 3, Chapter 16, written by Bishop Athanasius Schneider elaborates on schism and schismatics. In it he writes:
"564. Who are schismatics? Those who received baptism, yet have been separated from the unity of the Catholic Church by refusing to recognize the Supreme Pontiff or have canonical communion with him and the other members of the Church (e.g., the Orthodox).
Nonetheless, there are various positions on what constitutes schism and schisma:tics:
1.) Those who say one must both recognize and submit to Francis to not be schismatic. They view EO, R&R, and Sedevacantists as schismatics but ironically not protestants.
2.) Those who say one must recognize Francis as pope to not be schismatic but one can resist under certain conditions. They view EO, protestants, and Sedevacantists as schismatics although it isn't definitive if they believe modernist popes can be in schism against past popes on teachings such as cohabitations "having the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity", teachings concerning Luther's on Sola Fide despite the Council of Trent and a plethora of popes in conjunction with it and after it denouncing Sola Fide, and on teachings concerning other matters.
3.) Those who say one must say a papacy exists, has existed since the time of Pope St. Peter until now, and one must both recognize and submit to it and him but see it as being currently vacant.
Schismatics, to them, are EO, protestants, and some Catholics either because they neither recognize nor submit since Luther, or because they recognize a papacy exists but have no communion with it, or because they recognize and submit to Francis on various matters even though he and modernist popes resist the teachings of past popes or past Councils until now, even though those past popes and past popes, in conjunction with or in later agreement with those past Councils, set precedent and were all in agreement with Florence
, Trent, etc, one after the other after the other up until and past Vatican I.
Thank you for this education, at 12:00 eastern today, 10/26 on Sophia Institute youtube channel, Bishop Schneider and Cardinal Sarah will discuss the launch of this book!
Hello, i like your channel but the demand we attend a TLM but NEVER a Novus Ordo i believe is an issue that as a Baptized Catholic i must disagree with. It is self evident that the TLM is more Sacred or Holy, or im not sure the exact correct terminology, but it is surely of Satan himself that one is instructed to not go to Mass at all over attending a NO. Though the NO may be deficient compared to the TLM and suffering obtained through its abuse on top of that, even if it cause you pain to attend, it is mandatory that you give worship to God every Sunday at the Mass, even if others intend on defiling it. Gods grace will get you through a bad liturgy, but you owe worship to God in the Mass on Sunday even if you cannot attend a TLM. I believe there should only be the TLM, but i cannot support skipping Mass if you only have a NO. If there is an argument against this that holds merit, anyone but preferably the host of the video please answer, then reply please with CHARITY and RESPECT, and i will listen. Thank you, and thank you for this channel, i love your videos.
It is a matter of conscience. Nowadays I cannot, without violating my own catholic conscience of what is the Mass, attend a novus ordo mass. Everyone has their conscience on this issue after stuying the subject
The Novus Ordo is not Catholic.
Cranmer and Luther could not have done better
@@tony1685 The Church is the pillar and ground of the truth. I it was established by Jesus as his body.
I can agree with you up to a point. The NO is all I had so when I didn’t know anything else, I agree.. but since attending the TLM for a while, I know that to go back to a NO would kill me, if not bring me close to it. When I first heard about not attending a NO I was slightly scandalized, but now attending is quite the scandal. I would just go ahead and suffer it, but I have 3 children and have become adamant that it would not be a place for them.. not for the sacraments at least. I’ve become too sensitive to do that. There are great people to listen to and when they agree, I feel like I need to make the hard step and move closer to a TLM only parish so that the sacraments won’t be taken away from my family as easily as they have been these past years. It’s been a journey, it hurts to think I might have to live further from my big family in order to have this available for my kids/self/husband. The discernment process is hard. But I finally came to the place that feels like this is the hard choice I have to make. If I could wish that every NO in every town just went back to offering the TLM so that I could live or travel wherever I want, then I would, but I’ve been scandalized enough and I have children to raise.
I hope this helps. I could say more, but my post is long enough as is.
Can you make this a “Playlist” so it can be found and followed? Please. A fan.
Can you please turn this into a “Playlist”, so I can find it.
Nick, have you read Theology and Sanity by Frank Sheed? I just finished it.
Costume party?
the link about the rosary is leading to a different website
See my reply on "universal acceptance" on gregshinaberry's comment just next to this.
Noticed the subtle jab against "nuanced apologists" which I assume is a thinly veiled reference to Michael Lofton. I wonder if you will engage the arguments he recently levied against this catechism as it touches on magisterial submission and so-called "Papal heresy."
He is sedevacantist..Credo has many theological errors and twist many things from original cathechisme...
Credo, a Compendium of the Catholic Faith, Part I, Section 3, Chapter 16, written by Bishop Athanasius Schneider elaborates on schism and schismatics. In it he writes:
"564. Who are schismatics? Those who received baptism, yet have been separated from the unity of the Catholic Church by refusing to recognize the Supreme Pontiff or have canonical communion with him and the other members of the Church (e.g., the Orthodox).
Nonetheless, there are various positions on what constitutes schism and schisma:tics:
1.) Those who say one must both recognize and submit to Francis to not be schismatic. They view EO, R&R, and Sedevacantists as schismatics but ironically not protestants.
2.) Those who say one must recognize Francis as pope to not be schismatic but one can resist under certain conditions. They view EO, protestants, and Sedevacantists as schismatics although it isn't definitive if they believe modernist popes can be in schism against past popes on teachings such as cohabitations "having the grace of a real marriage because of their fidelity", teachings concerning Luther's on Sola Fide despite the Council of Trent and a plethora of popes in conjunction with it and after it denouncing Sola Fide, and on teachings concerning other matters.
3.) Those who say one must say a papacy exists, has existed since the time of Pope St. Peter until now, and one must both recognize and submit to it and him but see it as being currently vacant.
Schismatics, to them, are EO, protestants, and some Catholics, either because they neither recognize nor submit since Luther, or because they recognize a papacy exists but have no communion with it, or because they recognize and submit to Francis on various matters even though he and modernist popes resist the teachings of past popes or past Councils until now, even though those past popes and past popes, in conjunction with or in later agreement with those past Councils, set precedent and were all in agreement with Florence
, Trent, etc, one after the other after the other up until and past Vatican I.