I have zero issues with my Shark, but mine is about 5 or 6 years old now. It has multiple filters which I like because it definitely does well for my allergies and asthma and it works great on my carpet as well as my hard flooring and hardwood. I suppose if I was to have any complaints with my Shark it would be, if you are using the hose/tools sometimes the dirt won't go down into the bin, but instead up top and it will clog after that. Otherwise, it's a fantastic vacuum.
LOL, I think even a shop vac might get clogged up for this test! I'm guessing your wife must have been out of town for all of this. I am very impressed that the Shark Stratos was able to work so well, considering the conditions. Thanks for this over-the-top demo, I quite enjoyed it, lol.
Haha no wife unfortunately. I was impressed too with how clean it left the floor, picking up literally everything before it clogged! Many thanks for your comment showing your appreciation, it’s muchly appreciated✌🏽
Great mess test! 🤩 It kind of seems like the shark rollers push the dirt into the carpet and leave alot of dark areas on the carpet. How was this compared to the antihair wrap shark? Did it struggle with fine dirt too? The Dyson performed really well! How did you clean the carpet after this?
That’s an interesting point! I wasn’t really sure that the front fluffy roller actually rubbed dirt into the carpet until I noticed it made darker dusty patches along the edges, normally that would easily be vacuumed away with the crevice tool after I vacuum throughly from these tests, but the dusty patch on the edge after this vacuum was harder to remove! I used the Dyson DC17 after this test to clean up thoroughly :) Thank you for your comment!! Glad you enjoyed the video
Fair statements all. Question though - how many homes have littered about the flooring half of a pickup truck’s bed full of soil? I don’t think any vacuum is manufactured to handle this extreme of example.
You are correct, although it’s very intriguing for the following reasons; - Shows an accelerated scale of how much a vacuum cleaner can handle before losing suction - Shows how well a vacuum cleaner can surface clean on a variation of different floor types - Demonstrates the power of a vacuum cleaner - Demonstrates how efficient the filtration is on different vacuum cleaners - How easy they are to use - How easy they are to empty Whilst these tests aren’t an accurate representation of the real world, it’s interesting and entertaining to see how different makes and models work 😄
I have seen a lot of these Sharks with the duo technology clog up and they dont agitate as much. I prefer Shark over Dyson but I will not have the duo brushroll. I do also agree that the cyclone does get clogged easily if not careful with them.
I don’t guess it was really designed to suck up such a large amount of dirt and huge clumps of hair with fast quick passes like this. If the passes were a bit slower, the big clumps would have a chance to break apart some and spin up and out of the cyclone part and into the dustcup. It wouldn’t clump up into a huge ball that can’t pass up and over the top through the opening that way. Ive had my corded Vertex upright with the duoclean head for 4 years. I haven’t had any issue with the powerhead or the cyclone part clogging up. Once in a while a piece of plastic or something gets wrapped around the metal part but that’s about it.
I had a Shark I attempted to use daily like a year ago and it was just terrible. It wouldn't do anything but surface clean, and the filters would clog up after one room, the worst part is... that vacuum was $200. Shortly after I traded it to someone for a Fantom Fury and the Fantom has still not clogged and cleans really well. For the price these Sharks cost they should AT LEAST have a proper dual cyclonic set up and be able to clean carpets properly.
@DonivanCurtis900 same actually lol. I have a few furies so I carefully use the "worst" one. Though I still service the motor every few years to make sure it stays healthy.
Wow that’s shocking!! I thought Sharks would have been okay for normal vacuuming due to their dense filters I like Sharks for their ease of use and user friendly design, but they just really struggle to deep clean unfortunately too. As much as I appreciate a Shark vacuum, I much prefer a good Dyson Nice to hear about the Fantom vacuum!! I would absolutely love one of those someday, they look really cool!! Dual cyclonic technology should be the bare minimum in vacuum cleaners in 2024 now as that technology is at least 30 years old, but a lot of bagless vacuums still don’t even have that
As usual love your videos Tayyab but this shark is one big piece of shat 😂 Having to keep emptying and constantly cleaning the filters even in normal use would drive me nuts too. Why do people keep buying this junk? Send it back mate if you can!!!!! Good fun watching it thoigh. It must take you ages to lay all that dirt down!
Stratos….. I hated mine. Worked decent on carpets, leaked a lot of dust anytime I used carpet fresh. It finally got thrown in the dumpster. Tried to clean my car and the damn thing wouldn’t go into liftaway mode then the hose snapped
I think vacuum cleaners are meant for inside the house? Not to vacuum, your yard or the dirtiest thing you find In this case looks like an area that hasn’t been cleared in 50 years. I think it’s still doing marvelous job. It’s not the canisters fault that there is 20 pounds of dirt pass. Not a good review scenario. That’s like trying to vacuum the beach and getting frustrated.
Yeah this particular Shark isn't very good in more ways than one. First off it is way too loud and for some with sensitive hearing he or she would have to wear ear protection. The Power Detect one is a million times better and so are the older Sharks. I just got a new Shark myself because the old one that i had the power cord was slowly dying. We end up getting the ZU102 Which is the Rotator with PowerFins. Hair pro and Odor Neutralizer technology and it works great so far. Shark has no excuse not to make a dual cyclonic upright because the James Dyson patient expired back in 2013.
We have one, it’s alright. It does the job, but the plastic hinge at the base has snapped so it doesn’t stand on its own anymore. It’s just an off-brand early Dyson with a strong motor.
@@George45339 I have cats and the little part at the top of the bin fills up and the cat hair wraps around it and greatly reduces or stops the suction until you clean it off. It’s okay if you vacuum really frequently but I would think with dogs even vacuuming once a day you might have to keep cleaning it off. I don’t have very much to vacuum and we only have 2 cats and it’s a pain
I agree, Sharks are very nice vacuums and they have so much potential, but they are let down by 2 major things; the cyclone design and the brush roll hardly has any decent bristles on it to get in between the carpet fibres, instead it relies on these rubber blades to sweep the carpet and it kind of agitates too which I like, but can’t beat a good old proper brushbar
This isn't even realistic pickups. Vacuums aren't meant to pick up a half a ton of dirt and rocks thrown all over a carpet...they r gonna clog and fail trying to do so it's common sense. 😂
I am going to sell my stratos xl it is so heavy and so $hit I might get the nz690 ( I did not pay for the stratos I got it free coz my nz801 had tripe the electric so I sent them it back and they sent this
![[2024] New Shark PowerDetect Pet vacuum cleaner- Performance Testing](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-voL9XDBtuk/mqdefault.jpg)
![[2024] New Shark PowerDetect Pet vacuum cleaner- Performance Testing](/img/tr.png)
Older sharks are way better than the newer ones which is weird because you’d think it be the opposite🤷🏾♀️
I have zero issues with my Shark, but mine is about 5 or 6 years old now. It has multiple filters which I like because it definitely does well for my allergies and asthma and it works great on my carpet as well as my hard flooring and hardwood. I suppose if I was to have any complaints with my Shark it would be, if you are using the hose/tools sometimes the dirt won't go down into the bin, but instead up top and it will clog after that. Otherwise, it's a fantastic vacuum.
LOL, I think even a shop vac might get clogged up for this test! I'm guessing your wife must have been out of town for all of this.
I am very impressed that the Shark Stratos was able to work so well, considering the conditions. Thanks for this over-the-top demo, I quite enjoyed it, lol.
Haha no wife unfortunately.
I was impressed too with how clean it left the floor, picking up literally everything before it clogged! Many thanks for your comment showing your appreciation, it’s muchly appreciated✌🏽
Great mess test! 🤩 It kind of seems like the shark rollers push the dirt into the carpet and leave alot of dark areas on the carpet. How was this compared to the antihair wrap shark? Did it struggle with fine dirt too?
The Dyson performed really well! How did you clean the carpet after this?
That’s an interesting point! I wasn’t really sure that the front fluffy roller actually rubbed dirt into the carpet until I noticed it made darker dusty patches along the edges, normally that would easily be vacuumed away with the crevice tool after I vacuum throughly from these tests, but the dusty patch on the edge after this vacuum was harder to remove!
I used the Dyson DC17 after this test to clean up thoroughly :)
Thank you for your comment!! Glad you enjoyed the video
It picks up really well. 👍
those good crackle sounds🤤🤤
Looked promising at first. Love how it sucks up the fluff but then the big blow out. Still great video and sounds ❤❤❤❤
Fair statements all. Question though - how many homes have littered about the flooring half of a pickup truck’s bed full of soil? I don’t think any vacuum is manufactured to handle this extreme of example.
You are correct, although it’s very intriguing for the following reasons;
- Shows an accelerated scale of how much a vacuum cleaner can handle before losing suction
- Shows how well a vacuum cleaner can surface clean on a variation of different floor types
- Demonstrates the power of a vacuum cleaner
- Demonstrates how efficient the filtration is on different vacuum cleaners
- How easy they are to use
- How easy they are to empty
Whilst these tests aren’t an accurate representation of the real world, it’s interesting and entertaining to see how different makes and models work 😄
I have seen a lot of these Sharks with the duo technology clog up and they dont agitate as much. I prefer Shark over Dyson but I will not have the duo brushroll. I do also agree that the cyclone does get clogged easily if not careful with them.
I don’t guess it was really designed to suck up such a large amount of dirt and huge clumps of hair with fast quick passes like this. If the passes were a bit slower, the big clumps would have a chance to break apart some and spin up and out of the cyclone part and into the dustcup. It wouldn’t clump up into a huge ball that can’t pass up and over the top through the opening that way. Ive had my corded Vertex upright with the duoclean head for 4 years. I haven’t had any issue with the powerhead or the cyclone part clogging up. Once in a while a piece of plastic or something gets wrapped around the metal part but that’s about it.
This was a great mess test
Amazing test
Thank you JT ☺️😁❤️
Here. I love these videos
Dyson DC04 to the rescue
Excellent video thanks
You’re very welcome!
It's so relaxing, thank you
You're welcome 😊 glad to hear you like it!
i loved the grr at the start 😂😂😂
Amazing Parwaz ❤
❤️❤️❤️
GEARY: 0:43 Shoo, your making a mess! 0:45 Spotless! Hahahahahaha! Oh ho ho ho ho ho. One try, machines will always win!
I had a Shark I attempted to use daily like a year ago and it was just terrible. It wouldn't do anything but surface clean, and the filters would clog up after one room, the worst part is... that vacuum was $200. Shortly after I traded it to someone for a Fantom Fury and the Fantom has still not clogged and cleans really well. For the price these Sharks cost they should AT LEAST have a proper dual cyclonic set up and be able to clean carpets properly.
Fantom to the rescue! (Just be careful with the precious bean🥺)
@@IntellitechStudios I make sure to be very careful with it. I already have 5 Furys in my collection so that is why I feel comfortable to daily it.
@DonivanCurtis900 same actually lol. I have a few furies so I carefully use the "worst" one. Though I still service the motor every few years to make sure it stays healthy.
@@IntellitechStudios I also use my "worst" one lol, it is kinda loud and doesn't stand up but it does the job
Wow that’s shocking!! I thought Sharks would have been okay for normal vacuuming due to their dense filters
I like Sharks for their ease of use and user friendly design, but they just really struggle to deep clean unfortunately too. As much as I appreciate a Shark vacuum, I much prefer a good Dyson
Nice to hear about the Fantom vacuum!! I would absolutely love one of those someday, they look really cool!! Dual cyclonic technology should be the bare minimum in vacuum cleaners in 2024 now as that technology is at least 30 years old, but a lot of bagless vacuums still don’t even have that
Great video mate as always
Thank you glad you enjoyed!!
The max feel line is on the top
that dyson clean up was too good 😮💨
As usual love your videos Tayyab but this shark is one big piece of shat 😂
Having to keep emptying and constantly cleaning the filters even in normal use would drive me nuts too.
Why do people keep buying this junk?
Send it back mate if you can!!!!!
Good fun watching it thoigh.
It must take you ages to lay all that dirt down!
Stratos….. I hated mine. Worked decent on carpets, leaked a lot of dust anytime I used carpet fresh. It finally got thrown in the dumpster. Tried to clean my car and the damn thing wouldn’t go into liftaway mode then the hose snapped
I’ve never been a fan of Shark vacuum cleaners always Dyson DC04 to the rescue a vacuum cleaner you can trust
3 words: Dirty-fan Turbopower
I think vacuum cleaners are meant for inside the house? Not to vacuum, your yard or the dirtiest thing you find In this case looks like an area that hasn’t been cleared in 50 years. I think it’s still doing marvelous job. It’s not the canisters fault that there is 20 pounds of dirt pass. Not a good review scenario. That’s like trying to vacuum the beach and getting frustrated.
This is what he does to all the vacuums, though. Really extreme fine dust tests, he doesn't claim it to be a simulation of day to day vacuuming.
Yeah this particular Shark isn't very good in more ways than one. First off it is way too loud and for some with sensitive hearing he or she would have to wear ear protection. The Power Detect one is a million times better and so are the older Sharks. I just got a new Shark myself because the old one that i had the power cord was slowly dying. We end up getting the ZU102 Which is the Rotator with PowerFins. Hair pro and Odor Neutralizer technology and it works great so far. Shark has no excuse not to make a dual cyclonic upright because the James Dyson patient expired back in 2013.
This clogges quicker than a vacuum that uses paper bags!
I’m thinking about getting a shark
We have one, it’s alright. It does the job, but the plastic hinge at the base has snapped so it doesn’t stand on its own anymore. It’s just an off-brand early Dyson with a strong motor.
If you want a good deep cleaning shark, go with the navigator nv360. It’s the cheapest of the three good navigators
Except to be constantly cleaning the filters and replacing them at least once a year even if they are kept clean
@@ruthanneluvsvacuuming6653 yeah that’s what puts me off because we have a dog and I can just imagine the amount of time having to wash the filters
@@George45339
I have cats and the little part at the top of the bin fills up and the cat hair wraps around it and greatly reduces or stops the suction until you clean it off. It’s okay if you vacuum really frequently but I would think with dogs even vacuuming once a day you might have to keep cleaning it off. I don’t have very much to vacuum and we only have 2 cats and it’s a pain
8:30 this video just became vacuum torture at this point 😭 how is a shark this bad
Sharks haven’t got the technology like Dyson’s do that keeps the filter clean, so the filters clog and the machine loses airflow sadly
good old 04
The real crime is wearing socks and walking around in that filth without shoes omfg.
Next is Bissell pet hair eraser
Sharks are usually great but this one was shocking performance. The amount of dirt left behind and clogging quickly. Standards have fallen.
I was thinking the same thing! 😮
I agree, Sharks are very nice vacuums and they have so much potential, but they are let down by 2 major things; the cyclone design and the brush roll hardly has any decent bristles on it to get in between the carpet fibres, instead it relies on these rubber blades to sweep the carpet and it kind of agitates too which I like, but can’t beat a good old proper brushbar
LOL what standards? Shark is bottom of the barrel crap trying to pass themselves off as a premium brand.
This isn't even realistic pickups. Vacuums aren't meant to pick up a half a ton of dirt and rocks thrown all over a carpet...they r gonna clog and fail trying to do so it's common sense. 😂
I am going to sell my stratos xl it is so heavy and so $hit I might get the nz690 ( I did not pay for the stratos I got it free coz my nz801 had tripe the electric so I sent them it back and they sent this
I like the shark
one is clean better
Why does this guys house keep getting so dirty? Wow he needs help
Dont doo that you can breaking are weehl
Yo!
Yoooo
That was kinda one of the worst Shark performances I ever watched wow
7:50 it isn't doing anything at all this is hilariously bad
8:29 oh my god that was something
8:53 thank you for including the clean up to this utter disaster
🤍💙🩵🤍💙🩵
OMG! I was coughing, sneezing, and itching just watching this. 🫣
My garage isn't anywhere that filthy!