I would like to have more discussion about how to measure dating success before starting to measure it. Improving methods of measuring often lead to greater scientific success, so that should be taken very seriously.
I think the men who are muscular gain their higher body counts (number of mates) by sleeping with women who are high on sociosexuality mostly. And women who are high on sociosexuality show attraction to men who are muscular (they view those men as much more attractive). Women who are low on sociosexuality don't find muscular men as attractive as women high on sociosexuality find them, but women low on sociosexuality aren't sleeping around mostly, so most of the body count of men who are muscular is coming from women who are high on sociosexuality.
Can you name an experiment, to meassure the impact of this effect? Or how to analyze data from previous Experiment to validate this effects strenght to account for the effect in the video?
@@Daniel-ws9qu Speaking from experience, this is spot on. Get muscles and the sluts will come...most likely when they're ovulating...which has caused me a few problems
All these studies don't paint the full picture, because quite simply they only measure quantity and don't take into account quality. For example, who is more successful? A guy who slept with 10 women, but all were supermodels, or a guy who slept with 100 women, but all were plain looking? In my opinion, the first guy is wildly more successful.
Personal experience: 1.I've sometimes been more muscly than what's said to be ideal by women in these surveys.....it appeals LOTS to about a 3rd of women, and more appealing to another 3rd than they seem to admit in these surveys 2. I fit the description of "scary"....pending aggravated assault charge and similar problems in the past. Same thing...this is VERY appealing to about a 3rd, and more appealing to another 3rd than they want to admit to others.
I would like to have more discussion about how to measure dating success before starting to measure it. Improving methods of measuring often lead to greater scientific success, so that should be taken very seriously.
I think the men who are muscular gain their higher body counts (number of mates) by sleeping with women who are high on sociosexuality mostly.
And women who are high on sociosexuality show attraction to men who are muscular (they view those men as much more attractive).
Women who are low on sociosexuality don't find muscular men as attractive as women high on sociosexuality find them, but women low on sociosexuality aren't sleeping around mostly, so most of the body count of men who are muscular is coming from women who are high on sociosexuality.
Can you name an experiment, to meassure the impact of this effect? Or how to analyze data from previous Experiment to validate this effects strenght to account for the effect in the video?
🎯
@@Daniel-ws9qu Speaking from experience, this is spot on. Get muscles and the sluts will come...most likely when they're ovulating...which has caused me a few problems
All these studies don't paint the full picture, because quite simply they only measure quantity and don't take into account quality. For example, who is more successful? A guy who slept with 10 women, but all were supermodels, or a guy who slept with 100 women, but all were plain looking? In my opinion, the first guy is wildly more successful.
Personal experience:
1.I've sometimes been more muscly than what's said to be ideal by women in these surveys.....it appeals LOTS to about a 3rd of women, and more appealing to another 3rd than they seem to admit in these surveys
2. I fit the description of "scary"....pending aggravated assault charge and similar problems in the past. Same thing...this is VERY appealing to about a 3rd, and more appealing to another 3rd than they want to admit to others.
Do I got to commit a violent crime to gain that charm ey.