Here’s How Noah Fit All the Animals on the Ark

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
  • For many people, the question of how Noah managed to fit all the animals on the ark is a source of confusion. In this video, Tim Chaffey delves into the topic and offers compelling insights and explanations.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 292

  • @RS54321
    @RS54321 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    What about all the fresh-water creatures? Surely the change in salinity would've negatively affected them? Also, how do you account that every insect could survive the floodwaters for months on end? Did they all burrow into the earth and hang out until they could come out again?

    • @RS54321
      @RS54321 ปีที่แล้ว

      @G A Steam, as in fresh water evaporating off the ocean? Yes, this is how distillation works, yet the ocean itself remains salinated.

    • @RS54321
      @RS54321 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @G A But fresh water creatures don't live in the ocean...hence my initial comment.

    • @RS54321
      @RS54321 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @G A Oh, you meant streams, not steam. OK, yes salmon can go into the salt water for a time, but they're not in freshwater streams in the ocean (which very inconsistent and unpredictable), so that's a different thing, though I see what you're saying. However, salmon is one type of fish-it doesn't account for all the other freshwater fish or other creatures that aren't able to adapt in this way.

    • @Gospeed777
      @Gospeed777 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GA-hl8twyou hear about the guy who found a lake in the ocean? He spoke on discovery then mysteriously died the day they were going to go back

    • @thomasodonnell5667
      @thomasodonnell5667 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      God only destroyed the land animals, on things that live on the land. Sea creatures survived, proof of this is the turtle, crocodile and many others.
      He only took 2 of each land species on to the ark, so two horses covers all of that animal family, zebra's to donkey's. Same goes for cats and so on, so its not as many as you'd think.
      All water before the flood was fresh, this is evident by the bladder in all fish whether salt of fresh water, they all have the bladder that's needed to pee in fresh water. The salt ones still have it its just it does nothing now cause its not needed.

  • @GM-ny5cc
    @GM-ny5cc ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It's interesting that the 'holy spirit revival', that's happening at Asbury University Campus, is only one hours drive, from Ark Encounter, also located in Kentucky! Very interesting!

  • @deusexisteumdesafioacienci1074
    @deusexisteumdesafioacienci1074 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bom dia. Li um artigo científico de vocês sobre as espécies e quantidades de animais na Arca. Sairia um outro artigo, e não encontrei. Pode informaremos os links desses artigos? Obrigado

  • @tonysheerness2427
    @tonysheerness2427 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The animal kingdom paid a very high price for the sin of man.

    • @flyingspaghettiauditor
      @flyingspaghettiauditor ปีที่แล้ว

      That's nothing new for god. Even after the flood, he encouraged humans to kill animals and set them on fire because the smell was pleasing to his nostrils.

    • @Censoredbyyourcult
      @Censoredbyyourcult ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In this specific scenario they didn't as it didn't nor couldn't possibly have happened.

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      In books removed from the bible, like the book of Jasher, it says that man learned to interbreed different species and create hybrids. And Genesis says that all flesh on earth was corrupt, and animals are flesh. So they were destroyed since they were no longer how god created them.

  • @inquisitive_stranger
    @inquisitive_stranger 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "The whole world was an ocean..." Have you ever tried to take care of a salt water tank? Just a small environmental change and they die.... So the entire world was under water and yet all the salt/fresh water fish survived..... What about the desert species of plants and animals? I suppose they were all onboard in climate controlled facilities, along with the polar bears, penguins, artic fox.... But let me guess, a pair of dogs, breed and made all the foxes in the world....

  • @3piper
    @3piper ปีที่แล้ว +7

    One theory is that most of them were put in a state of hibernation and kept calm

    • @cbdwarfer9492
      @cbdwarfer9492 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Surely that would only apply to a tiny minority of animals that were capable of hibernation? The vast majority are not, so to assume it could apply to most of them seems like, please pardon the expression, a "God did it with magic" explanation for one of the many issues with the biblical flood myth.

    • @waynejoiner
      @waynejoiner 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Noah was already in a state of hibernation before he even built the ark.

    • @pvmoore1154
      @pvmoore1154 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@waynejoinerAt least he wasn't on "tranq". Get some help, man!

  • @fernandotalledo2566
    @fernandotalledo2566 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So he didn't bring the panda bear, or the polar bear he just pick one of the many and then the other evolved..?

    • @arkencounter
      @arkencounter  ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/cbx1dHMzPc4/w-d-xo.html

    • @flyingspaghettiauditor
      @flyingspaghettiauditor ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly! Because evolution is a lie..... Except for super fast evolution from an inbred pair of individual bears in the span of a few generations

    • @fernandotalledo2566
      @fernandotalledo2566 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Wait.. you are saying that Noah's only picked a type of bear and all the others evolved from it. In that way all the animals could fit in the Ark.. is that what the bible say? Or is this just an interpretation to make it possible? But if that's what you are saying then, you still got to put them back in each corner of the world and make them EVOLVE quicker (in less than 5000 years).. sonare you saying that all bears (the one from South America to the one in North America, the polar bears and all of them evolved from a common ancestor less than 5000 years ago.. do you have any data to back it up..

    • @fernandotalledo2566
      @fernandotalledo2566 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Other possibility is that all animals that existed before Noah's Ark and still exist should have been passengers of the Ark. So all the types of llamas should have been passengers of the Ark and they should have crossed the Atlantic even if they can't swim and the jungle.

  • @sgt.grinch3299
    @sgt.grinch3299 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I am so excited about coming to visit the ARK. It will be one of the best days of my life. God bless everyone at the ARK.

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Make sure you ask them why the animals for the petting zoo aren’t housed inside the ark. Also, could you please ask them why there are 50 keepers for these animals and not just 8? While you’re at it, could please ask why there are more than 8 people maintaining this boat?

    • @cbdwarfer9492
      @cbdwarfer9492 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Bomtombadi1 Dude, why are you applying rational thinking to this story? You're never going to believe it at that rate!

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cbdwarfer9492 I know, right?! Curse this rational thinking ability I possess. It’s really holding me back from being able to hold myself back

    • @cbdwarfer9492
      @cbdwarfer9492 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Bomtombadi1 One of the reasons we are not creationists I guess, this ridiculous inability to lie to ourselves. Lying to others is easy ("Of course you don't look fat, darling"), but lying to yourself takes real commitment!

    • @RedMissileGaming
      @RedMissileGaming 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @landonengel3558
    @landonengel3558 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    How long ago was this supposed flood? Are we to believe that these "kinds" could turn back into the full number of species that we see today in such a short amount of time?

    • @lewiscarey6984
      @lewiscarey6984 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      4,000 years is NOT a short amount of time!! Do research, diligently, and honestly, YOU may at least accept a different view, other than religion of evolution! ✝️

    • @landonengel3558
      @landonengel3558 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@lewiscarey6984 if you've been following this thread you should understand that I am more than willing to do my research. In terms of biological changes on the scale that is required, 4000 years is like mere seconds to us

    • @michaelgroob3760
      @michaelgroob3760 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@lewiscarey6984 Religion is the basis of confirming a belief without questioning it or of cherry picking to confirm it. Ken Ham in his debate with Bill Nye specifically said that nothing would change his mind. This is very far from understanding evidence based results.

    • @theoriginalzach4340
      @theoriginalzach4340 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Look at all what wolves have become...

    • @landonengel3558
      @landonengel3558 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theoriginalzach4340 with intentional cross-breeding. And even with human intervention it didn't just happen overnight

  • @zombiesheep.whatsinyourhea9166
    @zombiesheep.whatsinyourhea9166 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    How do you explain the mixing of salt and fresh water for fish etc?

    • @rockmusicvideoreviewer896
      @rockmusicvideoreviewer896 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and it killing all plants. how did the plants come about after the flood?

    • @mathewjames1935
      @mathewjames1935 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Wouldn't this be calling God....incapable? Or not all powerful...also...if we can from literally molten rocks (as evolution says...with no water) where did the plants made of eater come from? And where did we come from (says we came out of the water)

  • @flyingspaghettiauditor
    @flyingspaghettiauditor ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Why hasn't any Christian ever made an all inclusive list of every "Kind" of animal and every species they evolved into? Because if anyone actually tried doing that, they would realize the whole concept is flawed.
    When you go back far enough in the fossil record you find things like synapsids, ancestors of both mammals and reptiles. Where would you classify something like that? There are intermediate species between every "kind" of creature making it impossible to fit everything into these separate categories.

  • @84cch
    @84cch ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Tell me you don't understand how generics work without telling me.

    • @mathewjames1935
      @mathewjames1935 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Tell me you don't think God is all powerful and nothing is out of his reach of abilities, without telling me.
      The thing is this: you may doubt something you know nothing about, because you look at it from a human perspective..if God is all powerful and all knowing and capable...genetics for animals means absolutely nothing when he's controlling the situation.
      Remember. Openly saying that God is a liar after He appointed people to write His actions as testimony..is a dangerous game. Play at your own risk.

  • @tammiel3812
    @tammiel3812 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I can’t wait to visit

  • @JamesRichardWiley
    @JamesRichardWiley ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How did Noah deal with the poisonous, flammable, methane gas when Noah's wife sparked up the fire for dinner?

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You would not stockpile foods that have to be cooked in that situation. That food would rot without being frozen.

    • @pvmoore1154
      @pvmoore1154 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fuel for the jet engines, of course!

  • @ToyTruck
    @ToyTruck 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hunting those animals were the real challenge, especially those living in other continents such as Kangaroos.
    Not to mention feeding them for several months!

  • @lauracaskey2753
    @lauracaskey2753 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    God willing, I am planning a trip to see this Ark and the Creation museum! Thank you so much for your ministry. God bless 🙏

    • @RedMissileGaming
      @RedMissileGaming 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Why? It’s all a lie. Lol. Basically, what he’s saying in the video is that evolution exist, but ask any Christian straight up if evolution exist and they will tell you no. He only needed 2 of each species? So they evolved, right? Even if he only needed 2 of each species they still couldn’t all fit.

  • @hansdemos6510
    @hansdemos6510 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The pivot to a more evolutionary interpretation of the word "kind" in the explanation of how so many different animals fit on the Ark has been fairly recent. Even nowadays, popular depictions of the animals on the Ark may include for example both lions as well as tigers, or both horses as well as zebra, even though this modern interpretation of the word "kind" would make such a depiction impossible.
    What is often overlooked in this explanation, is that it makes it necessary for the animals to go through a short phase of rapid evolution after leaving the Ark in order to get to the present level of diversity. So the common ancestor of the current lions and tigers must have evolved very rapidly in the first few years after the Flood to get to all the different cat-like animals like lions, tigers, jaguars, and pussycats etc. we all know and love. However, there are numerous problems with this view.
    First of all, there is no evidence that this happened at the required pace, and the fossil evidence for this recent evolutionary phase includes evidence for the concurrent evolution of the plants, insects, and water animals that Mr. Chaffey goes to pains to tell us were not on the Ark, and whose survival therefore did not depend on having only one pair (or seven) of an ancestral "kind" preserved.
    Secondly, if we interpreted the so-called post-Flood fossil record as containing evidence for evolution, then there is no reason not to interpret the earlier fossil record as containing comparable evidence for evolution. Drawing a line in the geologic column between Flood deposits and post-Flood deposits becomes completely arbitrary and meaningless when the fossil evidence extends over that boundary, as it most certainly does for many "kinds".
    Thirdly, it is a fact that the two animals we know for sure were on the Ark, the raven and the dove, definitely are not the ancestral "kind" of the Corvidae and the Columbidae, as is evidenced by the supposedly post-Flood fossil record, as well as by DNA analysis. Therefore the interpretation Mr. Chaffey proposes in this video cannot be considered Biblical.
    Fourthly, the post-Flood phase of rapid evolution must have stopped at some point before we get the first reports from our own ancestors about the animals we know nowadays. If the lion evolved from a cat-like "baramin" ancestor on the Ark, this evolution must have concluded before we get the first pictures of lions in wall paintings and reliefs. Leaving aside for a moment that such reports date back to before the young earther date for the Flood, this must mean that the supposed rapid evolution and where it stopped must have been miraculously conducted or determined by God. But that leads us to the question what the purpose is of the explanation Mr. Chaffey is giving us in this video; after all, if God was conducting or determining the outcome of the evolutionary phase in a miraculous way, then why could he not have made the Ark miraculously bigger on the inside to house literally all species, rather than using a mechanism that would remain unknown to humanity until Wallace and Darwin discovered it in the 19th century after Christ? If your explanation has to rely on miracle anyway, making them unscientific in the process, there is no reason why you should limit the miracles, is there?
    One of the reasons why this relatively new interpretation of scripture is being promoted, is that the evidence for evolution and scientific geology has become just about undeniable. By co-opting at least part of it, people like Mr. Chaffey hope to make their religious convictions at least plausible to people who do not want to, or who are unable to, evaluate the evidence for themselves. I think that is intellectually dishonest, and I think in the long run it will backfire.

    • @andrewrex9041
      @andrewrex9041 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the ark was real and the great flood too.

    • @hansdemos6510
      @hansdemos6510 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewrex9041 You said: _"the ark was real and the great flood too."_
      How do you know?

    • @Christian_counsel
      @Christian_counsel 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I appreciate the amount of time you took to write this. But all of your arguments go off of you thinking you know how old the earth is. And how much time there was for this evolution phase to happen. NO WHERE in the Bible does it say how old the earth it. And it’s a huge misconception that people believe it’s only 6,000 years old. This is never mentioned in the Bible.
      So it’s very possible for the evolution of these species to happen over time. I mean we are creating new breeds of dogs to this day.

    • @hansdemos6510
      @hansdemos6510 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Christian_counsel You said: _" I appreciate the amount of time you took to write this. "_
      Thanks! It's a labor of love.
      You said: _"But all of your arguments go off of you thinking you know how old the earth is."_
      No, I don't think so. i am just following what Mr. Chaffey says.
      You said: _"And how much time there was for this evolution phase to happen. NO WHERE in the Bible does it say how old the earth it. And it’s a huge misconception that people believe it’s only 6,000 years old. This is never mentioned in the Bible."_
      This is a young-earther channel, and the way they calculate the age of the earth is by adding the ages of fathers and sons in the genealogies in the Bible. I think you should complain to somebody else about this.
      You said: _"So it’s very possible for the evolution of these species to happen over time. I mean we are creating new breeds of dogs to this day."_
      I don't know what you believe, but if you believe there was a worldwide flood when anatomically modern humans roamed the earth, and if you believe there was a limited number of "baramin" on the Ark, then you are going to have a problem matching the fossil record with the required rapid evolution such a view requires.

    • @srctwd6041
      @srctwd6041 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Christian_counsel The earth is clearly less than 10,000 years old if you take genesis literally.

  • @Pay-It_Forward
    @Pay-It_Forward หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    *Noah had a magic staff similar to Moses (a Honey I SHRUNK the T-Rex Staff). That way plenty of room, food & water for 1.6 million species!*

  • @sharonblumrick8631
    @sharonblumrick8631 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Plants were not told to bring,how would they get sunshine

  • @Dave_ravenuoi
    @Dave_ravenuoi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love how he inadvertently admitted to evolution.
    Regardless write a conclusive list of what you consider separate “kinds”. The number is still within the millions. If you take land animals alone, the number is still within the millions. Or maybe even more.
    Also explain why there is animals on all the separate continents and different islands.

    • @rockmusicvideoreviewer896
      @rockmusicvideoreviewer896 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and that all the plants and insects died. so how did they come to life after the flood. and where did they put all the food for the animals to eat? And after the flood, where did the animals find food to eat?

  • @dragoness3606
    @dragoness3606 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It would have been nicer if this one video was a bit longer and more informative instead of being guided to other links of other videos =(

  • @nndwamatomukondeleli7617
    @nndwamatomukondeleli7617 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The more he explains it the more unbelievable it becomes

  • @JohanKylander
    @JohanKylander 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Wolves and foxes cannot interbreed.

    • @thesis-and-nieces6722
      @thesis-and-nieces6722 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That is irrelevant the idea is about kinds. Your statement os like saying can a zebra mate with a donkey. The answer is no, for the same reason but they are of the same kind. As variations of kinds spread, and mutations occur you get the subset of those kinds (fox, donkey, etc). Most likely you were just trying to find a zigger and not really after truth.

  • @Mikezulka
    @Mikezulka ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I want to visit this place but I’m have MS n I can’t get there cuz it’s health problems. But maybe someday I can go there to see. Or maybe not

    • @lewiscarey6984
      @lewiscarey6984 ปีที่แล้ว

      We're heading back to The Days Of Noah!! North America is going to pay a heavy price, for turning our back in God; 🛐✝️🛐✝️🛐

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Have you tried praying to god to heal your MS so you may go and bathe in his glory and salvation at the ark park?

  • @throckmortensnivel2850
    @throckmortensnivel2850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is such a thing as MVP. That is, minimum viable population. That is the minimum number of a population of a species in order to guarantee it's survival. For most terrestrial vertebrates that would be between 500-1000, but that is without taking into account inbreeding or genetic variability. When adding those in, the size of the population must increase dramatically. So however many animals these guys say they put on the ark, you have to multiply that times 1000 in order to guarantee the survival of the various "kinds". The presenter tells us that Noah wasn't asked to bring plants aboard the ark. Pardon me, but burying plants under salt water is not good for their health. How does he think plants, that depend on carbon dioxide and sunshine for life, managed buried under several miles of salt water? All of the terrestrial plant life would have died. Seeds might remain viable, but of course they could be buried under hundreds of feet of silt and mud. So when Noah and his family got off the ark, there was no plants to eat, no meat to eat, and no water to drink. And they were several hundred people short of a minimum viable population.

  • @junknstuff8501
    @junknstuff8501 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The flood lasted about 40 days but took about 150 days for the water to recede. Even though the ark on it's own 'could' float, and even if we take a lot of assumptions and calculate that all the animals could both fit and stay calm there is still something people forget about. They all need to not only eat but DRINK. Considering you can't drink sea water, add the weight of both the food & water....that boat don't float.

  • @jakehodder2173
    @jakehodder2173 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The amount of urine and feces would have become toxic and caused the animals to start suffocating though right?

  • @itzcaseykc
    @itzcaseykc หลายเดือนก่อน

    Another good presentation to get people to think. Maybe God had mixed groups up like having a pair of chimps & a pair of gorillas, a pair of one kind of horse & another of a different order, a pair of large felines & another pair of smaller kinds, etc etc. because they all came to the ark by sevens and by twos as we read in Genesis 7:2, 3. The KJV in Genesis 6:19 uses the word *sorts* whereas in verse 20 it uses the phrases "after their kind" and "of every sort."

  • @lanabowers5332
    @lanabowers5332 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The original, historical 'Noah' was Ziusudra/ UtaNapishtim. He was told to bring the SEED of living things, not the actual animals themselves. The ark was not an aircraft carrier sized floating zoo. It was a container ship. And, it was also a type of submarine. No surface ship could survive the water action of the flood.

    • @VisshanVis
      @VisshanVis 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The epic of Gilgamesh, and it happened 1500 years before the bible fantasy story.

    • @edgarmatzinger9742
      @edgarmatzinger9742 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VisshanVis That never happened also.

    • @VisshanVis
      @VisshanVis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@edgarmatzinger9742 The tablets from the Sumerians are in different museums around the world and they have been translated so they know exactly what they say the the stories they told, archeologists have excavated many Sumerian sites they know where and when they lived and it was around 3500 - 2500 years before Christianity poked its ugly head up.

    • @edgarmatzinger9742
      @edgarmatzinger9742 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VisshanVis Correct, they are stories. Still never happened. Or did they stories of Harry Potter happen too? Because books are the modern clay tablets...

    • @VisshanVis
      @VisshanVis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whether it be the clay tablets of the Sumerians, the Harry Potter tales or the bible or any other religious texts for that matter all fanciful made-up stories written by humans.

  • @mattnobrega6621
    @mattnobrega6621 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was to book a trip on the ark

  • @Alexr2735
    @Alexr2735 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    With out faith , it is imposable to please God , for he that cometh to God , must believe that he is God , And that he is a rewarder, of them that diligently seek him.

  • @howmanybabiesdidNestleKill
    @howmanybabiesdidNestleKill 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So they believe in evolution now?

  • @KDeds21
    @KDeds21 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I mean it stands to reason that there would be rapid evolution if you only had 2 of each animal repopulating the whole earth.

    • @kimberlycox1160
      @kimberlycox1160 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It stands to reason that such extreme interbreeding would cause species to die out.

  • @pm5039
    @pm5039 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With God everything was and is possible. Believe, trust. and have faith. We will have all those answer when the time comes

  • @jakehodder2173
    @jakehodder2173 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait this is so funny reading the comments and seeing everyone pick and choose which questions to answer because they have no answers for majority of the questions hahahahaha

  • @kevinlee5690
    @kevinlee5690 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    If God can miraculously made it rain, why can't the animals all miraculously fit in the ark??

    • @flyingspaghettiauditor
      @flyingspaghettiauditor ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Why couldn't god just miraculously make more animals from scratch after the flood? Or better yet, why not just smite all the wicked people instantly without killing any animals?

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why are there 50 keepers for 200 animals housed outside Ken’s toy boat?

    • @Bomtombadi1
      @Bomtombadi1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This isn’t an explanation it’s completely as hoc and solves nothing

    • @RS54321
      @RS54321 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@flyingspaghettiauditor I wonder if there were wicked creatures (from the Nephilim) that God wanted to destroy as well?

    • @Censoredbyyourcult
      @Censoredbyyourcult ปีที่แล้ว

      Magic!

  • @georg7120
    @georg7120 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why put all the animals in the ark? Hod could have created new ones, he has done it twice before?
    How did Noah know what animals were clean?

    • @flyingspaghettiauditor
      @flyingspaghettiauditor ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or better yet, why didn't god just snap his fingers and smite all the wicked people instantly without drowning all the animals?

  • @zombiesheep.whatsinyourhea9166
    @zombiesheep.whatsinyourhea9166 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about all the feed and poo?

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      Poo could just be thrown overboard.

    • @RedMissileGaming
      @RedMissileGaming 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Watcher_of_the_Heavenssmh. Gosh, people blow me away. Can’t believe they believe in this.

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RedMissileGaming People believe in lots of things that others think is crazy, no matter which religion it is part of.

    • @EndOfFreedom
      @EndOfFreedom 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He ate it

  • @sharonblumrick8631
    @sharonblumrick8631 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well i might be wrong about plants ,they would need them to feed the animals that didnt eat meat

  • @DejiAdegbite
    @DejiAdegbite 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All the insects could survive the flood??

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't think an all powerful God who created everything could make the insects survive?

    • @DejiAdegbite
      @DejiAdegbite 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nateg7100 How did he make the insects survive?

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DejiAdegbite I'm sure if he could create the Universe he could make the insects survive

    • @kimberlycox1160
      @kimberlycox1160 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nateg7100then why go to the trouble of making Noah gather up the other animals? If he could make the insects survive, why not the mammals?

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kimberlycox1160 I don't know. It was God's will though. As a human I'm not in a position to question the will of an all powerful God. The whole point of the flood was to flush the world down the toilet because it became too evil. The method he decided to do so is a moot point. I'm sure he could've just made it so in a snap but that wasn't his plan.

  • @chriskusher9735
    @chriskusher9735 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Every lane animal fit.. idc what this man taking bout

  • @sseel2877
    @sseel2877 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    LOL... never mind all the animals, you can't build a wooden ship that size. Heck you couldn't make a wooden ship 1/4 that size. Explain that first....

  • @user-kl1vy2wm7f
    @user-kl1vy2wm7f 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genesis 7:2 states that God told Noah to bring 7 of every clean animal and its mate onto the ark, and 2 of every unclean animal and its mate onto the ark. That's 18 of every animal in the world onto the ark along with enough food for them to eat for a year. (Not to mention how Noah disposed of their waste product). Where was Gopher wood found? It is only mentioned once in the entire bible. Not even the Ark of the Covenant was made of Gopher wood that we know of. I have asked many pastors about Genesis 7:2 and they sort of say it's a misunderstanding etc. No, it's right there plain as can be that Noah was to take 18 of every animal onto the ark, period.

  • @ianmohar4936
    @ianmohar4936 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So the dogs have been breeding with the hyennas, the zebras mated woth the horses, the tigers did the lions, the dinosaur's missed the ship entirely. Yes the fish can swim, and the whales. Not trying to be a bummer but its a tough pill to swallow.

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why wouldn't you think a God who created existence could make it so?

    • @edgarmatzinger9742
      @edgarmatzinger9742 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nateg7100 ♫🎶For the bible tells me so 🎶♫

  • @jasonscott6640
    @jasonscott6640 ปีที่แล้ว

    A Cubit was used a length of Measurement
    You are correct about that
    But Cubits were measuring the time solstice

  • @Mr05Chuck
    @Mr05Chuck ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good timing I had a guy this week say he couldn’t believe the Bible because of this topic.
    The question that I find hard to answer is the following. Why are most marsupials in Australia?

    • @mitromney
      @mitromney ปีที่แล้ว +4

      First of all, the answer to your question is already in what you've said. MOST marsupials live in Australia, yes. But not all, obviously. Australia has about 120 species of marsupials,=, but New Guinea has 53 species of marsupials. South and Central America have 90 species of marsupials... which is almost as much as Australia on their own. Even North America has some, although it's only two species of marsupials. Still, obviously evolution explains nothing here. If there are 90 species of marsupials in Americas and 120 in Australia, it actually fits perfectly into the biblical narrative of animals from Noah's arc spreading all over the world - the fact that they are distributed unevenly only means some continents and environments were fitting them more than others and they were able to grow freely in numbers and variations. Same can't be said about evolution. If gens of marsupials are a unique rare mutation that was only developed in Australia, there should be a total of ZERO marsupials everywhere else. And that's not what we find, is it.

    • @stephenberry8658
      @stephenberry8658 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly....

    • @TC-nd9sj
      @TC-nd9sj ปีที่แล้ว

      This answer is ludicrous... it's not going to convince any sceptics at all.

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You don't think a God who created time and the universe itself could figure it out?

    • @tamyahgalentine9734
      @tamyahgalentine9734 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@nateg7100 well expecting people to believe things that makes no sense is ludicrous 😂

  • @georg7120
    @georg7120 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But god commanded Noah to take all sorts into the ark, not kinds!

  • @geewizz4414
    @geewizz4414 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mankind - but he brought along each species of man. "we suspect" "we believe"

  • @CyrittaGibson
    @CyrittaGibson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤❤❤

  • @mw6057-q7x
    @mw6057-q7x 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am affraid Tim Chaffey is in error like his friend Ken Ham is. It looks like we need to wait for somebody that one day will explain the Noah story meaning. It seems like Ken Ham/Tim Chaffey mission is to keep damaging the flood story meaning. I am sorry 🤷‍♂

  • @ericcameron281
    @ericcameron281 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How can a person who didn't exist build something like an arc?

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because if you write it in a book people will believe it like baboons.

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're not one to question if you can't explain the Universe yourself

    • @vika0194
      @vika0194 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nateg7100 Okay. The earth is only 6000 years old. Noah built an ark with exactly two of every species (millions of animals). And there is only one god, every other god man made up is fake, only this one you say is real, is real. Feel better?

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vika0194 Where in the Bible does it say Earth is 6,000 years old? A day for God could be 1 billion years for us. Time is a human construct.

    • @thomasodonnell5667
      @thomasodonnell5667 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vika0194 give baboons a million type writers and a million years, they'd still be baboons.
      good logic though, i'm off to read the origin of species.

  • @god-xu3ig
    @god-xu3ig 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just stored a DNA sample of every living thing on the planet. Why can't these creationists get with the programme?

  • @ophirdog
    @ophirdog 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At best, the story of Noah's Ark is a metaphor. It is beyond the wildest of imaginations that this story could be anything but fiction. There are way too many questions and no realistic answers.

  • @lindas.8036
    @lindas.8036 ปีที่แล้ว

    He gave us a number, of animals, not how they would fit.

  • @benjaminavick6455
    @benjaminavick6455 ปีที่แล้ว

    to many ifs ands and buts here, everybody got a different theory and truth nobody knows.

  • @larry1824
    @larry1824 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the unicorns?😅

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      Unicorns actually aren't that far fetched. There is a whale with a horn, the Narwhal. And you forgot dragons(the serpent like dragons, that what ancient cultures depict them as, like the Chinese dragon).

    • @larry1824
      @larry1824 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Watcher_of_the_Heavens well Noah shoulda saved em. Thanks!!?!!!?!!!!!!!

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      @@larry1824 They are mentioned being around after the flood. Part of the book of Daniel tells of Daniel killing a dragon that the Babylonians were worshipping as a god. Today, they would either be extinct or hiding in some remote place.

    • @larry1824
      @larry1824 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Watcher_of_the_Heavens thanks but I'm being ironic I thought 🧐🧐🧐🧐

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      @@larry1824 Oh, sorry. I like being plain, blunt, and simple. So forgive me for not always catching ironism and the like.

  • @theodorerobert6579
    @theodorerobert6579 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To all those in debate, is it hurting you that someone believes something that you don't? Folks stop trying to convince each other. It's a waste of time. I'm a Christian, and I believe in God, but there are many things about the Bible i dont believe.

  • @nsp74
    @nsp74 ปีที่แล้ว

    yeah right
    ναι σωστα

  • @Web_Dev_Dude
    @Web_Dev_Dude 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wrong Heathen he brought 2 pairs of Unclean animals on the ark and 7 pairs of clean animals on the ark you people just keep on lying don’t U

  • @user-gb8fl4hk9x
    @user-gb8fl4hk9x 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Reality is not in this, they can say anything, but is it true. This is just nonsense

  • @johnboges1529
    @johnboges1529 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And I'll wait for your response but I guarantee you I don't get one

  • @RobertSmith-gx3mi
    @RobertSmith-gx3mi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do they collect all the animals? And then how did they return all the animals to their geographical locations? Where did they keep all the food for all these animals? Where did they put the waste from these animals.
    Who stayed with all the animals to make sure they procreated enough to repopulate their kinds.
    Oh yeah you wish the only question was where did they put all the animal.
    By the way this myth has been proven not to have happened.
    I know the non geologists and non. Scientists who have been educated with a fifth grade level of knowledge of deities find this hard to accept. But that's not our problem now is it.

    • @arkencounter
      @arkencounter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2019/08/09/your-ark-questions-answered/
      - Moderator

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't think an all powerful God who created everything could make it happen? Science also disproves the Big Bang.

    • @edgarmatzinger9742
      @edgarmatzinger9742 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nateg7100 _"Science also disproves the Big Bang."_ Wrong.

  • @vexxster2560
    @vexxster2560 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can insects survive a flood? They will drown..
    Also not all marine life can survive in the same waters, we have fresh water and salt water fish
    If it was just a kind needed , how did a polar bear then become a black bear after a few thousand years? Also how did a kangaroo from Australia even get to the arc in the 1st place.

    • @andrewrex9041
      @andrewrex9041 ปีที่แล้ว

      In fact God didn't say to save ALL animals,but most as possible and noah didn't have only one kind of water to keep them.
      Another debunked atheist.

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sure a God who created the heavens and the earth could get a Kangaroo from Australia in the Arc

  • @nndwamatomukondeleli7617
    @nndwamatomukondeleli7617 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy actually believes what he is saying 😅💔

  • @linzynhs3747
    @linzynhs3747 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    B.i.b.l.i.c.a.l.

  • @isk8ikill
    @isk8ikill 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm not going to trust any science coming from Sid off ice age....

  • @stephenberry8658
    @stephenberry8658 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well Aussie animals like kangaroos, koalas and platypus never made it onto this Ark ..
    Aboriginals missed the worldwide flood and managed 50,000 years of continuous culture, only interrupted by the fairly brutal British Colonisation.
    We do get droughts, floods and bushfires... but ours don't travel overseas.
    Funny how Ken Ham seems to exclude the reality of his homeland. Then Down Under a HAM IS A COMEDIAN...
    And what about the billions of stars and planets charging away from us... The Hubble & James Webb space 🌌 telescopes have given us a reality never dreamed of in the OLD Testament...
    The GOD is LOVE message of Jesus still rings true...

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      You do know that Australian Aboriginals have a worldwide flood story.

  • @peggyparrow2059
    @peggyparrow2059 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    GOD never said the animals were full grown either !? Think about it ?

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A lot of animals are full grown in a year or less and many need one or both parents until they are full grown. I guess you didn’t think about that.

    • @andrewrex9041
      @andrewrex9041 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidgardner863 herbivores take more than a year to be fully grown

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@andrewrex9041 , Some do, some don’t. The one size fits all approach doesn’t work.

    • @joshuachristian7792
      @joshuachristian7792 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidgardner863the flood lasted 40 days

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshuachristian7792 , How do you know? Do you have a time machine?

  • @waynejoiner
    @waynejoiner 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the world was so full of bad people, especially those evil diabolical babies, why didn’t god just strike them down dead? He’s god, he can do anything can’t he? Why waste time with a flood?
    Was god doing a little experiment for his own amusement?
    He sees the little children drowning and simply lets it all happen. The innocents (They can’t be all totally evil can they ?) are screaming and gasping for air and he looks on and thinks my plan is working! It’s horrifying!

  • @bjdoby
    @bjdoby 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Plants would die, insects would die. You are delusional.

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A God who created everything could save the plants lol

  • @russellschaeffler
    @russellschaeffler ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Watch carefully... This is the example of someone trying to make a square peg fit into a round hole.

    • @pvmoore1154
      @pvmoore1154 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @russellschaeffler Watch carefully again - This is someone willing to stand and be ridiculed, scrutinized, criticized and critiqued on logical, reasonable (and Godly) premises,... rather than hiding lies in conjured theories that have to span 5 BILLION YEARS so as to cover up the absurdity of the ridiculous narrative.
      Yet, you would RATHER believe the "scientific impossibility",... that "NOTHING" created "SOMETHING"?
      If so,... you would be far wiser if you spent a couple decades tying this young man's shoes.
      Your contempt for God is clearly illuminated,... but always know that forgiveness and eternal life,... awaits you,... at the foot of the Cross, through Jesus Christ, the Son of God.🙏

    • @CyrittaGibson
      @CyrittaGibson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can you make a better one?????

    • @russellschaeffler
      @russellschaeffler 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A square peg?

    • @frankcastle9691
      @frankcastle9691 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      A square peg will fit in a round hole if the hole is bigger.

    • @ericlonginotti7556
      @ericlonginotti7556 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Lol because he's able to think outside the box? What he's saying is right. I think it was Einstein (could be wrong) that said it makes you ignorant when you complain without a solution. Not the exact quote but Explain how anything he's saying is wrong. I'm sure he could go into more detail than that. Alot of the bibles stories seem impossible but they aren't. Alot of them have been proven that weren't believed possible at first.

  • @Maksie0
    @Maksie0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They didn't. It's not real.

  • @johnboges1529
    @johnboges1529 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you Christians and Catholics are hit with too much knowledge you won't respond

  • @EndOfFreedom
    @EndOfFreedom 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fictional

  • @TC-nd9sj
    @TC-nd9sj ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So Noah just brought two kinds of dogs and they evolved back into the different species? Kind of like how humans evolved from other species of primates I guess??

    • @jameshoyt3692
      @jameshoyt3692 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No you could never get a human from an ape. But given enough time, you could breed a poodle back into a wolf. All the potential of a wolf is still in a poodle.

    • @flyingspaghettiauditor
      @flyingspaghettiauditor ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jameshoyt3692 All of the best science contradicts your claim that humans can never evolve from apes. Categorically, we still are apes. And we have enough fossils to trace our lineage back to a common ancestor with chimpanzees.

    • @bikesrcool_1958
      @bikesrcool_1958 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@flyingspaghettiauditorjust make sure to watch out for all the fraudulent ones

    • @RedMissileGaming
      @RedMissileGaming 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jameshoyt3692you really believe that? 😂😂😂😂😂 🤡

    • @jameshoyt3692
      @jameshoyt3692 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RedMissileGaming believe what?

  • @williamfleaher5834
    @williamfleaher5834 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is God's creation and thus He can do anything He wants 2 it. And Bless the Lord 4 He is Great!!!✝✝✝

    • @Watcher_of_the_Heavens
      @Watcher_of_the_Heavens ปีที่แล้ว

      The cross, the symbol for Tammuz, the god of Christianity, along with Nimrod and Ishtar.

    • @VisshanVis
      @VisshanVis 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is that so, anything he wants to, why doesn't he not stop children from being born with disabilities and diseases then??

  • @Reppen555
    @Reppen555 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    also the biggest problem is theres no way in hell that noah would be able to capture all these animals and get them inside the boat, tons of these animals are really dengorus and would easily kill noah.

    • @MyLordAndMyGodJesusChrist
      @MyLordAndMyGodJesusChrist 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He wasn't alone and he build the ark for 75 years. Plenty time

    • @kristynkrey6988
      @kristynkrey6988 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He didn't have to capture them

    • @nateg7100
      @nateg7100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You don't think God could make the animals go onto the Ark?

  • @lanceroberts6113
    @lanceroberts6113 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What a joke...

  • @stevelawrence8352
    @stevelawrence8352 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Noah's Ark was found in the 👉"MOUNTAINS"👈 of Ararat. It's about twenty miles from Mt. Ararat, which is a volcano that was formed AFTER the flood.
    It was found, accidentally, by a Turkish (?) Air Force pilot, whose last name was Drupinar (sp), while flying on a mission to look for any nuclear missile bunkers in neighboring Russia in the 1950s.
    About twenty years later,a man named Ron Wyatt found the site and, after much archeological research, he confirmed that it was indeed the remnants of Noah's Ark. The site is now a National Park, after the Turkish government gave "official" recognition to the site.

    • @--..-...-..-.--....
      @--..-...-..-.--.... ปีที่แล้ว

      The Turkish government said that they are 99.9% sure which means they aren't sure

    • @frankcastle9691
      @frankcastle9691 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True story.

    • @edgarmatzinger9742
      @edgarmatzinger9742 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      _"Noah's Ark was found in the "MOUNTAINS" of Ararat. I"_ Wrong. As it never existed, it will never be found.

    • @foxcen6881
      @foxcen6881 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m a believer but this was proven false btw

    • @Sunshine19946
      @Sunshine19946 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If it is real, where is the actual proof? I don’t want just stories.

  • @GALACTUS-WORLD-EATER
    @GALACTUS-WORLD-EATER 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Lol an people actually believe this 😂😂😂

  • @sharonblumrick8631
    @sharonblumrick8631 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Plants were not told to bring,how would they get sunshine