Can Saskatchewan just stop collecting carbon tax? | About That

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2024
  • The Saskatchewan government has announced it won't pay the federal carbon tax on home heating. Starting next month, the province will look to stop remitting the tax to Ottawa on natural gas bills. Producer Lauren Bird explains why Saskatchewan says the tax is unfair - and whether a province can actually circumvent a federal law.
    »»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: bit.ly/1RreYWS
    Connect with CBC News Online:
    For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: bit.ly/1Z0m6iX
    Follow CBC News on TikTok: bit.ly/3TnHioe
    Follow CBC News on Twitter: bit.ly/1sA5P9H
    Find CBC News on Facebook: bit.ly/1WjG36m
    Follow CBC News on Instagram: bit.ly/1Z0iE7O
    Subscribe to CBC News on Snapchat: bit.ly/3leaWsr
    Download the CBC News app for iOS: apple.co/25mpsUz
    Download the CBC News app for Android: bit.ly/1XxuozZ
    »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
    For more than 80 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.

ความคิดเห็น • 419

  • @AB-ho1cr
    @AB-ho1cr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    My whole life I was like “why do these separatists want to leave the greatest country on earth” but now I think these people are the only ones who care. Institutions and government are failing us.

  • @jptrainor
    @jptrainor 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Yes. Of course they can. They prefer to enter into a dispute. Who better to enter into a dispute with the federal government.

  • @TravisSloat-ln2xv
    @TravisSloat-ln2xv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    The tax did NOT survive the legal challenge. The tax defence was "equally" across all provinces. When the Federal government carved out exemptions for some provinces, they undermined thier own legal argument. The Supreme Court ruling is no longer valid.

    • @maltymusk
      @maltymusk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cbc is in survival mode at this point. Bias won't be scaling back, narcissism always doubles down

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Except they didn't. As pointed out in the clip, the exemption isn't province-specific, it's type-specific. There's no guarantee the Supreme Court will view that as unfair. And honestly, the solution should just be to put the tax back on oil heating and call it fair again.

    • @mikedoan4247
      @mikedoan4247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@MrBrock314 i disagree. The solution is to remove the tax all together. The money being made by the people if better off in our pockets then the government. We can spend it better then they can.

  • @davidg9927
    @davidg9927 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    They were supposed to stop collecting any federal taxes in 1952… Lord Nelson case .

  • @kimschwenker155
    @kimschwenker155 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    You forgot to mention the 2021 judgement was based on the fact that the carbon tax was unilaterally applied to all of Canada except for Quebec, of course, which should have debunked its validity right there and then. Now though, the Federal gov't has broken their own policy with the carve out which gives the provinces the window of opportunity to refuse to collect and remit the tax. This dismisses the supreme court ruling based on the fact that the gov't itself has falsified or contradicted the very reason that made the tax constitutional according to the judge.

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The feds have been Quebec puppets since the Quebec act of 1791 allowed that culture to impose its will on the british

    • @AtteliaVel
      @AtteliaVel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Québec has had thier own plan for years along with Ontario . Doug ford pulled out of it and so the government put thier plan in place .

    • @socksrwooly
      @socksrwooly 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@AtteliaVelQuebecs plan does not reach the amount Provinces are supposed to be at. That is why the Maritimes where forced to change. Quebec is 10% of Canada.

    • @AtteliaVel
      @AtteliaVel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@socksrwooly every province could have had the Ontario and Québec plan . Ontario bailed because doug and now Québec stands alone .

    • @socksrwooly
      @socksrwooly 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AtteliaVel no only Quebec gets Quebecs plan. That is the same as the Maritimes, and they had to increase massively. Quebec literally just bought some carbon credits and called it good. Since they are their own Nation (as stupidly introduced by uneducated nepo baby) Canada can't actually push them to do more.

  • @Prairieshutterbug64
    @Prairieshutterbug64 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    Doesn't Quebec already cherry pick which federal laws it will follow?

    • @thomasroussel6897
      @thomasroussel6897 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Other than through the limited scope of the notwithstanding clause, which is legal and available to all provinces, Quebec has never unilaterally refused to apply a federal law.

    • @bradcanning875
      @bradcanning875 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Always the deflection to Quebec from the extremist conservative in our country.

    • @WeatherManToBe
      @WeatherManToBe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@thomasroussel6897 How can Quebec use the notwithstanding clause when they have not signed on to the Charter?

    • @Prairieshutterbug64
      @Prairieshutterbug64 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasroussel6897Perhaps that because no laws have been enacted that deliberately discriminate against the province.

  • @Tomyum19
    @Tomyum19 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    So why are they collecting the tax if its all paid back?

    • @WeatherManToBe
      @WeatherManToBe 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No choice

    • @lizliz4186
      @lizliz4186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Because it changes peoples' behaviour. And it takes money from those who have more and gives it to those who have less.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@lizliz4186 If the goal is to change behavior (which I agree is the goal) why did they remove it from the most polluting way to heat your house? They should have increased the tax on home oil heating to make people get rid of it faster if that truly is the goal.

    • @Tomyum19
      @Tomyum19 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lizliz4186 If the goal is to change behaviour then why is there a rebate that covers the cost.. It doesnt make any logical sense. Maybe im missing something. Plus why are we taking money from people and giving it to those with less in the form of a carbon tax?

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lizliz4186 I would change the wording to "takes money from those who EMIT more and gives it to those who EMIT less."

  • @simont9984
    @simont9984 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Damn right they can! Way to go Saskatchewan! Besides if Trudeau can avoid jail so can Saskatchewan. Also if they didnt take it in the first place everyone would be ahead. 90% on rebates is not 100%.

  • @BubbleButtsColoringBooks
    @BubbleButtsColoringBooks 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    The government told me that if I give them money the weather will be gooder!

  • @TheRabid0ne
    @TheRabid0ne 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    @ 7:00 There is an error... not everyone gets $ back... BC and Quebec do not.
    Also, the Feds LEFT the rebate on the Carbon Tax in place when they lifted it from the home heating oil...

    • @lizliz4186
      @lizliz4186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Because they don't participate. That's the choice those provinces made and they have their own plan. That was decided years ago.
      Saskatchewan had the choice to come up with their own plan, like BC, or join the federal plan. They choose the federal plan now they're reneging and being petty.
      If this is about savings, why don't they eliminate the provincial sales tax on home heating before asking for someone else's tax to be removed?
      Yes, 30% of Atlantic Canada, who heat with oil are still getting their rebate and so are the rest of the people, in provinces that participate, who have oil heating, including 12.5k oil heated homes in Saskatchewan.
      If you look at data, there's almost as many houses in Ontario that heat with oil as there is in all of Atlantic Canada. There's actually double the amount of homes that heat with oil in Quebec compared to all of Atlantic Canada. It's not an Atlantic Canada exemption, it's an oil heating exemption.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lizliz4186 It is vote buying exemption. The number of people in those other provinces that heat with oil do not have enough population to swing votes. Atlantic Canada does and just happens to be Liberal (for now).

    • @Travman60
      @Travman60 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kind of...yes.
      There's another error around 8:15 that calls it Saskatchewan's portion going the Federal pool, but each province has it's own pool.
      The Federal government will still rebate what they collected in Saskatchewan (or Nova Scotia) back to the province it came from, but that provinces pool will be smaller.
      Saskatchewan typically has the biggest per person rebate of any provinces because they use a lot of gas and pay a lot more than other provinces. Collecting less on gas would put them closer to the average rebate.

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's because BC already had a carbon tax that predated the federal one and Quebec uses a cap and trade system that already incorporates a price on carbon. BC residents get a rebate from their provincial government.

    • @TheRabid0ne
      @TheRabid0ne 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@john15008
      That doesn't change the fact that they said everyone receives one, when they clearly don't... and as to your last point... living in BC I haven't seen a carbon rebate in over a decade. You only get it if your personal income is significantly less than the median income in the province.

  • @johnbozak1662
    @johnbozak1662 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Good for Scotty! Made Dougy can crawl out from under turdeau’s desk and do the same now!

  • @StephenHill-zg8qr
    @StephenHill-zg8qr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    The question should be why every province is not axing the tax.

    • @bradcanning875
      @bradcanning875 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The answer is because they will be again requesting drought and wildfire relief as a result of climate change due to CARBON. Only the hypocrite foreign oil sycophants in conservative provinces want to take but not pay their share.

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe not aware of their constitutional rights? Quebec and the fed will use the notwithstanding clause that Trudeau sr put in to exempt his own province…

    • @bradcanning875
      @bradcanning875 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ironhell813 Yet Alberta and Saskatchewan are the only provinces who have threatened to use it.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because most poor people are benefiting from the tax - as illustrated in this exact clip. The stats are those who make $200 000 or less are generally breaking even on the tax. Only certain outliers (some rural locations, some high transit jobs (like truck driver maybe?)) may not be and, over time, those are getting adjustments like the 20% additional rebate for rural residents mentioned in this video.
      TLDR: Most people are NOT losing money from the tax, some are even GAINING money.

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of the tax gainers are middle class and immigrants. Poor gets next to nothing in Canada because conservatives often target them and coalition goves often take from them constantly. Canada is the most toxic country in the world to be in if your poor.

  • @TheRaidoRune
    @TheRaidoRune 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    All provinces shall stop paying that.

  • @StarvingDad4Change
    @StarvingDad4Change 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BC HAD A CARBON TAX, TEN YEARS BEFORE TRUDEAU'S TAX CAME INTO PLAY AND IT DIDN'T REDUCE ANY CARBON FROM BC EMISSIONS AFTER BEING IN PLAY FOR TEN YEARS, SO WHAT DOES THAT SAY?

  • @JohnDelong-qm9iv
    @JohnDelong-qm9iv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Trudeau should go back to school

  • @Gordon87Gekko
    @Gordon87Gekko 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Stop climate change, ban a Liberal!!😅😅😂

  • @Gomz1231
    @Gomz1231 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Keep these segments coming, CBC. About That is one of those shows I look forward to get an understanding of an issue at hand.

    • @gror7849
      @gror7849 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Paid troll!

    • @oakenleif
      @oakenleif 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're obviously employed by the liberals or CBC

    • @PlebThinker
      @PlebThinker 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      oh lord i would dive deeper then what the gov paid media is telling you

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Beautiful satire

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Try passing a sovereign act like Alberta and Quebec did and get control of your province back.

  • @tabooz0331
    @tabooz0331 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In Ontario, Newmarket, without counting the delivery and admin fee the carbon tax is around 94.7% on natural gas as it shows on my Enbridge bill. The government charges an extra 13% on the 94.7% carbon tax. My 03 Dec 2023 to 02 Jan 2024 gas bill: Gas Supply charge $75.61+ Fed Carbon tax $71.61 + Delivery and admin charge $126.12 + HST 35.54 Total bill $ 308.96 and the total tax government charged $107.15

  • @idcraw
    @idcraw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Where is this rebate? what a load of BS.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's part of your tax return. Most Canadians didn't notice the change as they don't keep a detailed record of their tax returns to notice the increase that coincided with the year the carbon tax was implemented.
      It's a silly implementation but nonetheless, most Canadians do make money or break even on it so it's even more silly to be opposed to it.

    • @j_mad
      @j_mad 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where is the rebate u ask. It goes to trudeau's pocket or to fund his vacations.

  • @JohnDelong-qm9iv
    @JohnDelong-qm9iv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Carbon dioxide in a not pollution.Ask a biologist.

  • @jkamarn
    @jkamarn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Why do Canadians in British Columbia not get a rebate?

    • @Tomyum19
      @Tomyum19 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      BC votes conservative. So they dont get favours.

    • @oldmanlearningguitar446
      @oldmanlearningguitar446 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Because BC does not have the federal carbon tax. They have their own provincial carbon tax and they lowered their provincial income tax when they brought that tax in.

    • @lizliz4186
      @lizliz4186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because BC chose to develop their own plan. Saskatchewan could have done the same but they didn't.

    • @idcraw
      @idcraw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      BC has a NDP government helping to block 234 in the senate thank Allister Mac Gregor

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s all about what qc wants since the Quebec act of 1791

  • @ladykaitan
    @ladykaitan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel this is sooooo missing the point that we need to move away from gaz and oil. the tax revenue must go towards that.

  • @basilcarroll9729
    @basilcarroll9729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The rebate will help folks fill the 4x4 and the furnace oil tank!

  • @CommonSenseCarlCanada
    @CommonSenseCarlCanada 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The cbc pretending not to be the regimes propaganda dept 😅

  • @chriswong4304
    @chriswong4304 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Federal laws are churned out in Ottawa with impunity , it's about time that the participating provinces are acting to remind Ottawa that Canada is a democracy and not some medieval feudal 18th century fifedom. This action prevents the phrase " give an inch and they will take a mile" from the legislation happy free loaders in Ottawa.

    • @bradcanning875
      @bradcanning875 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes and when those provinces want Federal money for drought relief and wildfires from climate change caused by CARBON our democracy can say pound salt.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We're a constitutional monarchy, not a democracy. Democracy is how we choose our reps. However, we're also a federally organized confederation. This too, was on purpose. The federal government is SUPPOSED to have the say over national things like the environment. Provinces are supposed to focus on day-to-day running like healthcare, domestic transportation and education.

  • @Grimshire
    @Grimshire 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Income taxes are paid by everyone. Extra taxes charged by our government are illegal. Take the current gov't to court or rebel

  • @jt8218
    @jt8218 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Civil disobedience is the way to go when the governments take more than half of your income to spend as they please.

  • @zzappligator
    @zzappligator 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Increase carbon tax but reduce income tax such that net tax is less overall.

    • @mark.polo24
      @mark.polo24 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's actually a pretty decent idea

    • @lizliz4186
      @lizliz4186 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How does that change behaviour tho?
      Part of the idea is, one can't afford as much therefore ones consumption is reduced.

    • @mark.polo24
      @mark.polo24 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lizliz4186 except that clearly all this tax has done is cause division amongst Canadians and behavior hasn't changed whatsoever. No matter how much the federal government would love for everybody to sell their ICE vehicles and buy all electric, it's just not feasible for most people (this coming from someone who owns both an all electric and a full gas vehicle) let alone taxes on heating homes

    • @bradcanning875
      @bradcanning875 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or repeal the conservative created GST.

    • @kennordsfan1494
      @kennordsfan1494 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lizliz4186Plus when the liberals gave the Maritimes a carbon tax holiday for a fuel that pollutes more than natural gas? Really? If to your point is to change behavior which is a lie, then heating oil shouldn’t have had a reduction!

  • @jsander9469
    @jsander9469 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    It is the responsibility of citizens to disobey unjust laws. Good on SK.

    • @joshdun3290
      @joshdun3290 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Who get to decide what laws are unjust?? Sounds like lawlessness to me.
      Aren't you all the "law and order" party?

    • @Leakstop247
      @Leakstop247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds great! Sure worked out for those people down South facing 20+ years in prison.
      Rules for thee, not for me, eh?

  • @ksull8063
    @ksull8063 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why didn't the Feds government give other provinces time to switch.

  • @mrhurst198
    @mrhurst198 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No tax will ever fix the environment, get rid of the carbon tax in Canada

  • @zacharyrocks1
    @zacharyrocks1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Feds need to get the heck out of everyone's business.

    • @maltymusk
      @maltymusk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can't wait until they're gone.

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Here’s hoping for
      More sovereign acts.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ironhell813 Just move to a different country if you don't like confederation - it's easier than trying to break one up.

    • @ironhell813
      @ironhell813 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Iam already moving. But it’s a slow go because of resistance from Canada and my new country

  • @theracer6882
    @theracer6882 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you have to give rebate, don't collect the tax in the first place

    • @m.d.5788
      @m.d.5788 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just create a useless jobs and takes more money in tax form people who actually do the real job .

  • @Rick-zw9kp
    @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you heat a home with natural gas you pay more than you get back.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not generally true. Most Canadians break even on the tax or make money.

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrBrock314 I don't know about anyone else's home but it's true for my small home and I keep the temp at or below 20c

  • @thomascrowe3407
    @thomascrowe3407 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We have to go according to homesteaders sometimes, people that rely on their own self sufficiency as well. How much of the world is like that? Are we poisoning them?

  • @brenwick2010
    @brenwick2010 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Good for Saskatchewan ! You also can’t exempt some home heating suppliers and not others …

    • @kenf8378
      @kenf8378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Brenwick: But they do. Home use propane is still having CT collected on it. The gov't here in Sask is saying that the tax is being collected there because the suppliers are individual companies, and not the Province. Which is a weak excuse, since heating fuel is also distributed by suppliers and not the Gov't, and they were exempted by this knee jerk, poorly thought out move, whose main purpose was to trigger the base for the upcoming election.

  • @martypitt3319
    @martypitt3319 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does all provinces has the same minimum wage so what’s the problem here?

  • @user-to7ly6zz6k
    @user-to7ly6zz6k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One thing we do know after the last 8yrs is that Justin doesn't follow the laws and rules of Canada, sooooo FJT

  • @cs3818919
    @cs3818919 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The question the CBC should be asking instead of all this rebate crap is, is the carbon tax reducing emissions? And more importantly, has it affected the global climate in some way. If course the answer to both is, no. Making life more expensive for Canadians while not accomplishing anything for the environment. Poilievre is completely right. It's just a tax plan.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You won't be able to see the effects of the carbon tax for years - much like climate change. By the time you do, it will be too late.

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't be silly. Applying a tax cannot affect global climate. It's supposed to provide an incentive for people to lower their emissions. Want to get back more than you pay? Make choices that reduce your carbon footprint. You can easily look up ways to do this.

  • @debturcott6800
    @debturcott6800 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    With millions of dollars paid towards carbon tax one would think Canada's footprint should be almost nothing. Maybe if Turdo stopped using private planes all the time our carbon footprint would drop.

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thank you for showcasing how little you understand carbon pricing. No one ever said it would result in anything close to zero emissions. It provides a financial incentive to emit less by making low emitters financial beneficiaries and penalize those who emit more than their fair share. What's wrong with that, exactly?

    • @user-pf1th3jx6y
      @user-pf1th3jx6y 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is nothing. There is barely any industry in CAN’Tada and the Boreal Forest more than absorbs what the atmosphere doesn’t exhaust. It actually has a negative carbon footprint and it contributes to the “greening” that is actually helping the planet. That’s not scary though. So, you’ll never hear that from any govt funded scientists. Which are the ONLY scientists that mainstream media is allowed to air.

    • @rhetorical1488
      @rhetorical1488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@john15008 lemme guess 100% safe 100% effective.

  • @gbosdet1
    @gbosdet1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I liked the video but I think there is a lot of confusion about why someone might make a temporary exception for home heating oil specifically. Heating oil is old tech and the people using tend to be poorer, the price has nearly doubled over the past few years, so it costs about 4 times as much to heat your home with heating oil without the carbon tax as it does to heat it with natural gas with the carbon tax. There is still plenty of price pressure for those people to switch their home heating systems and programs to help them do it. That context is important. It was still probably a political decision but its not completely ridiculous and no one with natural gas heating would want to trade places with someone with heating oil.

  • @catc8233
    @catc8233 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is Andrew Chang?

  • @eddobond76
    @eddobond76 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why do you mean get most of money back ,from carbon tax?😊

  • @andrewryba7864
    @andrewryba7864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    yes they can and they are.

  • @kaze987
    @kaze987 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only ones who are guaranteed to benefit from this defiance? The lawyers to study the law and argue the cases, and the accountants and actuaries to crunch the numbers. Politicians playing politics = job security

  • @SnowWhite-hr4ho
    @SnowWhite-hr4ho 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes they can all provinces should follow suit.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not legally they can't. They're free to do it in the same way people are free to steal and murder. You CAN but you'll get in trouble for it.

  • @thomascrowe3407
    @thomascrowe3407 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And what if it was all going into Provincial coffers? Would SASK., Save All Souls Kanada, feel better about charging people then?

  • @abhishek090887
    @abhishek090887 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Give me the answer who saves on Carbon Tax.
    I pay 22c/ l and we have to drive a lot foe work. So about 100l a week. means I pay 22$ / week. means $22x52 = 1104/ year just on gas alone. then is heating then is grocery then on everything else I buy. But I only get 280$ back. how is it even.

    • @kenf8378
      @kenf8378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The CT in Sask currently is about 14 cents a litre. If you are paying 22 cents, get a new fuel supplier.

  • @teemoerich7442
    @teemoerich7442 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You forgot to mention the 2021 judgement was based on the fact that the carbon tax was unilaterally applied to all of Canada except for Quebec, of course, which should have debunked its validity right there and then. I agree with this statement . How does the federal government break its own laws by giving a break to NS and Quebec? that is the question you should look into ....

  • @wildandliving1925
    @wildandliving1925 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Province are governments not people so they dont have the same rules

  • @chrisdyck1995
    @chrisdyck1995 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    They can, and they absolutely should. Amd so should every other province. The feds are so out of line we should be flat out ignoring anything they have to say at this point.

    • @icantwiththis
      @icantwiththis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Anytime Jolie Trudeau or Freeland walk into a room, every Canadian should be turning their backs to them completely, and in every situation.

    • @jay7T6
      @jay7T6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@icantwiththis Great idea. Will you have a big frown, crossed arms and stomp your feet while you turn your back like a 4 year old?

    • @hexxlaxx2992
      @hexxlaxx2992 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@jay7T63rdhoe and his minions does the same things in question periods.

    • @jay7T6
      @jay7T6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @hexxlaxx2992 I know you are but what am I? There. I'll argue on your level

    • @hexxlaxx2992
      @hexxlaxx2992 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jay7T6 if they can't answer like adults they should be prepared to be treated as children.

  • @joewinterhalt
    @joewinterhalt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Good job Saskatchewan!

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because? This could all backfire on them, hurting some of their citizens financially and their protest might not be worth it.

    • @joewinterhalt
      @joewinterhalt 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because….everyone should stand up to this tax among others and many other mandated “ideas”
      If you want to pollute the planet less find the solutions that help not policy’s that destabilize civilization. I wish you well John.

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joewinterhalt Destabilize civilization? I think you’re being somewhat melodramatic.

    • @aetherfox4404
      @aetherfox4404 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@john15008 We will just leave along with Alberta. Enjoy trying to support Quebec if we go.

    • @john15008
      @john15008 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aetherfox4404 Adieu!

  • @m.d.5788
    @m.d.5788 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All provinces should stop paying this taxes! Pierre for PM! As soon as possible!

    • @Leakstop247
      @Leakstop247 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      'this taxes' Definitely a Conservative

  • @wickertwm
    @wickertwm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the Federal Government wants to play hard ball Saskatchewan can have a referendum to l;eave the country. I think that the Federal Government does not believe that Provinces will opt out of the country because of their back governance, however I would be happy to see Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and B.C. to leave this commonwealth and go on their own. They need us much more than we need them. This worked well for Quebec didn't it?

  • @PlebThinker
    @PlebThinker 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i got 1 rebate it was worthless

  • @izbicnohr1102
    @izbicnohr1102 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So you expect people in saskatchewan to live in condos and move to a cities? Have you ever been to saskatchewan? It is a prarie province...

    • @kenf8378
      @kenf8378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A large majority of Saskatchewan people live in towns, cities and villages. There are only 23 to 30 thousand farms left, many of those farms have a lot of hired help, but they live mostly in towns. So when were you in Sask. last?

  • @WhiteRaven12773
    @WhiteRaven12773 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    well if no one follows the rule they cant arrest every one maybe a few to try and scare us vs criminal but dose not always work

    • @kenf8378
      @kenf8378 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      great idea. Next time you go to a gas station, don't pay the full bill, deduct 14 cents a litre and drive away. And good luck with that!

  • @spring456923
    @spring456923 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Come on Canada get together and join the fight against the tax on heating oil and gasoline. We have to put a stop to the madness of our prime minister.

  • @thew9gamergamer8
    @thew9gamergamer8 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the only province can pick and choose is quebec apparently. AXE BILL 96!

  • @fleurettespreen
    @fleurettespreen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All Canadian provinces and territories except Quebec cause they’re not patriotic to Canada should protest with the citizens and not collect the tax.

  • @kevinparker48
    @kevinparker48 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Good for you Sask. "Taking your money is constitutional". I think everyone hates the carbon tax. Home heating? Like staying warm in the coldest country on earth? Hmmm this is one of the many reasons why I left Canada.

  • @steverobinson4691
    @steverobinson4691 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe Canadians should stopped paying taxes until we're sure Trudeau is out of office let the province is collected keep it for them and then spend it on each of our provinces and that way we know at least it's being spent on stuff we need

  • @mrf9342
    @mrf9342 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Carbon tax is just a cash grab. Good luck to Saskatchewan!

  • @Woolverine25
    @Woolverine25 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YES!! They already have stopped collecting the carbon tax!! EVERY province should copy Saskatchewan!!

  • @malcolmmartin5167
    @malcolmmartin5167 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I personally believe that every province should support Saskatchewan’s

  • @Cballin
    @Cballin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saskatchewan doesn't get to decide that.

  • @jeffreyquinn3820
    @jeffreyquinn3820 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just playing devil's advocate here, but the point of the carbon tax is to make certain things more expensive so that we use less of them. Heating oil is already several times the cost of natural gas, and homes that use heating oil were paying several times the carbon tax that homes that use natural gas.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As they should since they pollute more. If the point of the tax is get everyone to be greener than the highest polluters should pay more. Not less which is what removing the tax does. It goes against the very point of the tax which means the tax stands for nothing.

    • @maltymusk
      @maltymusk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tax achieves nothing.

  • @ah4800
    @ah4800 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If Trudeau can somehow avoid jail, so can the crowns

  • @iansuntjenssli9739
    @iansuntjenssli9739 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What would Central Canada do if the west left?

    • @AtteliaVel
      @AtteliaVel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      West would lose more then canada . Zero trade deals and i certainaly wouldnt want westerns in canada without checking every inch of there car and trucks for guns . Face it west loses just like uk brezit.

  • @gerardleclerc2657
    @gerardleclerc2657 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    More rebate to equalizer, just skip the cost to begin with

  • @vask9748
    @vask9748 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The carbon tax will be gone soon. So it doesn't matter.

  • @biggame3107
    @biggame3107 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Poilievre carbon tax war is a joke, a few days ago I was in Ottawa ONT, and the price of gas at multiple stations was $1.47 about a km away in the province of Quebec the gas was $1.38, Ford the Ont conservative PM had in previous months removed 5cents of the carbon tax saying he wanted to give his province a break, guess what the big oil companies took that money for themselves. So Poilievre the bad guys here are the big oil companies gouging Canadians it's overcharging us 75 cents a litre. But Poilievre isn't going after big oil companies that would not be good for Alberta the only province he cares about.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This argument does not make sense. Why would the big bad oil companies not just raise it in both provinces? Quebec does not have the same carbon tax as Ontario.

    • @maltymusk
      @maltymusk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Carbon tax is everywhere, open your eyes. Farmers will put this cost on us.

    • @xpyrox5462
      @xpyrox5462 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      wow you are clueless hahaha..

  • @lawrencecheung73
    @lawrencecheung73 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Music to my ears whenever someone gives TRUDY and all his LIEberal Minions the BIG MIDDLE FINGER !!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @ArthurB26
    @ArthurB26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    "Pay the carbon tax and you'll get all your money back in the form of a rebate"
    Okay then why have the tax? 😂

    • @plav032
      @plav032 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Did you watch the video? If you consume less, you pay less, and get the same rebate, so those who live with minimal impact will actually receive more than they spend in taxes. Its to provide incentive to change behavior, whether that's transportation, consumption of goods, improving home energy efficiency, etc.

    • @ArthurB26
      @ArthurB26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@plav032 "It provides incentive to change behavior, whether that's transportation, consumption of goods, improving home energy efficiency"
      Sure maybe it provides the incentive but does it make it more feasible for the average Canadian to do any of those things?
      Change transportation? You mean buy a more eco friendly vehicle? Improve home energy efficieny? You mean switching your homes heating system? How is a $1200 rebate supposed to make that possible? Do you own a vehicle? Do you own a home? Doesn't sound like it 😂
      Those two things would cost upwards of $50,000... your little rebate doesn't provide incentive nor the ability to "change behavior".

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@plav032so if you're wealthy you don't have to change anything cool

    • @basilcarroll9729
      @basilcarroll9729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its always been if you use less you pay less,nothing new there. The rebate will help folks fill the 4x4 and the oil tank!

    • @ArthurB26
      @ArthurB26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@basilcarroll9729 The goal is to get rid of 4x4s and oil tanks... you realize that, right?

  • @dominic8197
    @dominic8197 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good i hope they do this.

  • @larrychampoux9934
    @larrychampoux9934 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Carbon taxe is a scam

  • @maxlipovore
    @maxlipovore 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Go ahead Justin. Charge Scott Moe. Prove your dictatorial instincts. You're really just showing your true colours.

  • @annumkhosla
    @annumkhosla 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is BC premier?? O no.. its NDP.. they probably want to increase the tax😂😂😂😂

  • @donnarocha4043
    @donnarocha4043 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Pierre Poilievre definitely has my vote, I love common sense. I love Canada 🇨🇦 axe the tax for ALL Canadians.

  • @ryansutton5904
    @ryansutton5904 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Axe the tax now....

  • @iansuntjenssli9739
    @iansuntjenssli9739 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Either or we need this idiocy done

  • @JJJohnson441
    @JJJohnson441 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saskatchewan is the hicktown of Canada

  • @shopnstuff8228
    @shopnstuff8228 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yeah would be nice to stop robbing ppl blind

  • @gerardleclerc2657
    @gerardleclerc2657 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *has to reluctantly abide by

  • @idcraw
    @idcraw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who is still in favour of giving the CBC tax dollars ?

    • @maltymusk
      @maltymusk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can't wait till it's gone. The bias won't be going away until their last day, if anything they'll be amping it up. Narcissism always doubles down.

  • @ddcc0v0
    @ddcc0v0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love how you use another reporter as if they are an expert, as she sits at home on a Zoom call.

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They use an activist to pose as a reporter who poses as an expert.

    • @maltymusk
      @maltymusk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This media organization needs to shrink from an elephant to a mouse

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That person actually is an expert - read the titles.

  • @user-cm2py9cs6p
    @user-cm2py9cs6p 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Doug where are you ?0

  • @andrewryba7864
    @andrewryba7864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    C b c trickle down economics. Don't collect it in the first place. And you don't have to give any back is way better than collect a ton. And give Some back.

  • @SubArcticAdventures
    @SubArcticAdventures 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did anyone else’s screen go into blackout so you couldn’t watch this video? Mine did. I still had audio, but the video blacked out. Not the first time I’ve seen this happen, and it seems to only happen with videos that question the Canadian government in some way…

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope, your conspiracy theory is debunked.

    • @SubArcticAdventures
      @SubArcticAdventures 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrBrock314 I must’ve scared them 🤣😂

    • @FineIChangedItYoutubeDontBeMad
      @FineIChangedItYoutubeDontBeMad 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you're on mobile it can happen a lot I usually just close and re open the video to fix it

  • @brandysnaps9221
    @brandysnaps9221 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pay carbon tax and you are allowed to keep polluting.
    Just an added tax

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Carbon is not pollution. You mean emitting.

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just like drinking and smoking.

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrWookie1981 heating a home is just like drinking and smoking???

    • @MrWookie1981
      @MrWookie1981 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Rick-zw9kp According to this government, yes. Carbon tax is just another sin tax to force change in your behaviour like drinking and smoking.

    • @Rick-zw9kp
      @Rick-zw9kp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrWookie1981 heating your home is not a sin. Driving to work is not a sin. Carbon is not a sin. Carbon is basic building block for all life on earth.

  • @ddcc0v0
    @ddcc0v0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So anyone who has to drive to work is paying more than anyone who can sit at home and cook during the zoom call. Guess which job is more important.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cooking for your family by far. At a lot of those offices, you're wasting time doing terrible jobs and should really be working from home.

    • @rhetorical1488
      @rhetorical1488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrBrock314 your plumber and electrician will work form home and you can do it yourself over zoom. critical thinking was never your strong suit eh?

  • @annsumner8570
    @annsumner8570 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Western independence. Gawd!

  • @gror7849
    @gror7849 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When you favor certain provinces over others and especially in areas where the Lib's are struggling in the polls but have the most MP's (looking at you NL with 6 Lib MP's of a total 7) you can no longer claim that this is a fair decision taken with Canadians in mind because you excluded 70% of us.
    This was an uninspired political move from a constantly uninspired politician which created just another division among us Canadians!
    That is the root cause of what SK is trying to do here and I personally fully support them, legal or not! Considering where we are as a nation today due to Trudeau's incompetence, disobedience seems like the only reasonable thing to do.
    PS: Serve us right for electing an individual only capable of riding his name and who's only job before was a 6 month professorship in which he managed to knock-up a student!

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your anti-Trudeau bias is showing. Unfortunately, none of your statements are remotely helpful in fighting climate change so you have nothing to offer.

  • @HumanLanguageByHumans
    @HumanLanguageByHumans 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank God some provinces are waking up and standing up to dictator Trudeau and his abusive policies.

  • @Lordbalogna
    @Lordbalogna 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Rebates... money exchanging hands for no reason. Just stop taking it lol

    • @Sam19509
      @Sam19509 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It is like smoking and drinking. Higher prices change behaviour and if you continue doing it you pay more.

    • @Lordbalogna
      @Lordbalogna 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sam19509 totally different topic and you're pushing legacy media narratives. Look at the price for records... That's not how human psychology works.

    • @ArthurB26
      @ArthurB26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@NikolaJokerMVP15 That's politics; give people a couple hundred dollar cheques and they'll vote for you.

    • @plav032
      @plav032 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sam19509 shhhh... careful with logic and reasoning around these bunch, they only think with emotions.

    • @ArthurB26
      @ArthurB26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@plav032 You think taxes on cigarettes have changed people behavior? I guess you're kinda right but not in the way you think. Most people I know just buy untaxed cigarettes from reserves 😂

  • @garryellis7861
    @garryellis7861 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    everyone dont have to abide by this just ask the people in eastern Canada their tax got put on hold right

    • @ddcc0v0
      @ddcc0v0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shhhhhhh. 😂

    • @oldmanlearningguitar446
      @oldmanlearningguitar446 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not true. Everyone in all provinces who heat with oil (and some homes in all provinces use heating oil) got the same tax exemption.
      P.S. Not all taxes are “equal” across the country. For example more corporations are based in Ontario than Saskatchewan so Ontario pays more corporate income tax than Saskatchewan. People in BC earn more money than people in Nova Scotia so BC pays more income tax than Nova Scotia.

    • @garryellis7861
      @garryellis7861 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol keep up the good work justin is so proud of you @@oldmanlearningguitar446

  • @rikro6067
    @rikro6067 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Get rid of Trudeau (Epstein friend), and the inefficient Carbon Tax that contributes to making Canada unlivable 🤫

  • @rv2167
    @rv2167 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Canada's emission is about 60mt per year. Last year's forest fires emitted about 180mt. We are not doing anything about dealing with these fires that cause 3x the amount of pollution that we do. We should be treating this like a war - all resources into prevention, fire bombers and putting these fires out yet we do nothing.

  • @user72974
    @user72974 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trudeau's decision to make some peoples' home heating cheaper and not others' was the wrong way to go about this. If you want to help people in Atlantic Canada get off home heating oil and onto more climate friendly home heating, provide rebates for replacing home heating oil systems. Either way, the federal government pays for it (as either lost carbon tax revenue or new rebate cost), but one makes much more sense from the perspective of the public.
    They could even go beyond home heating oil and also help with rebates for the cost of replacing natural gas home heating systems too.

  • @pauldonovan9713
    @pauldonovan9713 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    If anyone in Saskatchewan doesn't feel like paying any provincial tax ... don't pay it . Mo is setting the example.

    • @MrBrock314
      @MrBrock314 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And be prepared to pay the $5000 fine. Maybe the premier of Saskatchewan gets away with it but don't try it on the individual level. You will be crushed.