I am Christian and it wouldn't matter if Jesus was gay.i admit I am a unique Christian though , in the sense that I believe homosexuality is a reflection of god just like any other sexuality.
When I was in grade 6, Matthew 5:27-28 convinced me that my sexual urges as a child came from the devil, simply because I thought that children were strictly forbidden of these urges until adulthood. But the rash of cases of "holy" men molesting little boys made me realize that I was lied to throughout my entire childhood about my own urges.
Briliant video, this guy have really good videos :). And it will be very interesting if Jesus was gay (if actually he existis of course lol), I would like to see some christians facing that fact.
I've heard more men on TV and TH-cam defend being gay with a quick disclaimer of "even though I'M not gay... I'm all for gay rights" etc. etc. Jon Stuart and Bill Maher do that. That always sounds condescending and patronizing. Not quite as stupid as "I can't be gay 'cause I'M MARRIED!" but almost. Well, I used to love love love slobbering all over a SOME but certainly not all women's nude bodies, and ramming the ol' John Thomas home to ejaculation was the apex of mortal experience yes indeed. But did that define me as straight? When I was young and we were all more attractive and women were more eager for sex, then yeah for sure I would choose to be with a woman rather than a man. But having had some same-sex experiences fiddling about with my buddies as a pre-teen, I never felt that I could honestly refer to myself as "straight." What would I be then? Bisexual? Some argue there is no such thing. One is either gay or straight. No in between. Well they can go to hell. I don't believe a man would be honest if he says he's never thought about what it would be like to suck a cock. When I imagine snuggling and having my arm around someone and sleeping with that person, it's always a woman. But on the other hand the older and more broken down I get, the more I think that only another man could relate to how I feel about some things. Having sex with a man has moved onto my bucket list. I always felt it was a bridge too far, and that women would completely 86 me after that. But maybe not . Guess I'll find out.
as much as I like your scepticism .. you are going too far by actually creating the thing you hate the most ... misinformation with a little true behind it... Christianity has nothing against gays .. is people who do and take it different directions. please lower down your imagination. What you presenting is from personal representation and observation you experienced... hence your talking about is more subjective than objective ... scientific -wise very unsupported. You cant fight faith of belief with science and vice-versa... if this was meant to warm up the hearts of your audience with another humour piece .. then perhaps you achieved it ... cheers
martinicelli cussavachi Christianity has nothing against gays? Read Leviticus 20:13, which is the Mosaic Law that says that gay people should be killed. In case you're one of those people who thinks that old testament law was put to an end, here is a new testament example. Romans 1:26-27 "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error." The due penalty here is likely referring to the old testament punishment of death in Leviticus which I referred to in the first paragraph. As far as not being able to fight faith of belief with science, I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean that faith is an unscientific and useless way to discover truth, then I would agree. Otherwise, nobody really buys the non overlapping magisteria nonsense anymore. As for you calling the video non-scientific, we agree on that. It is interpretation and shouldn't be taken as fact of course. Sort of a thought experiment I guess.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 10](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8kldrPPsDZs/mqdefault.jpg)
@becomepostal
Pat Condell is the messiah of comedy sent to save humanity's sense of humor!
Pat Condell is great. Funny, clever, well-informed, to the point, and perfect in his delivery.
"Jesus and the 12 boyfriends", that line made me laugh. Never thought about this... but yea, it actually makes sense lol
I am Christian and it wouldn't matter if Jesus was gay.i admit I am a unique Christian though , in the sense that I believe homosexuality is a reflection of god just like any other sexuality.
Why the hell was this video taken down... Anyway thanks for uploaded it, Pat's a legend :)
When I was in grade 6, Matthew 5:27-28 convinced me that my sexual urges as a child came from the devil, simply because I thought that children were strictly forbidden of these urges until adulthood. But the rash of cases of "holy" men molesting little boys made me realize that I was lied to throughout my entire childhood about my own urges.
Pat Condell is the real and only Messiah. Amen :-)
SHOWWW
Wonderful!
This is awesome....
great vid :D
Briliant video, this guy have really good videos :). And it will be very interesting if Jesus was gay (if actually he existis of course lol), I would like to see some christians facing that fact.
Actually, there is evidence for Jesus being gay: he loved ALL men.
spoonfitr
sub to the PatCondell channel for more amazing videos!
"There's no real evidence for anything to do with religion"...
ummm hello?
Well, those who are dead in their sin are completely blind and deaf, so don't find it astonishing. Lolz.
Jesus hated religion dude.
I've heard more men on TV and TH-cam defend being gay with a quick disclaimer of "even though I'M not gay... I'm all for gay rights" etc. etc. Jon Stuart and Bill Maher do that. That always sounds condescending and patronizing. Not quite as stupid as "I can't be gay 'cause I'M MARRIED!" but almost. Well, I used to love love love slobbering all over a SOME but certainly not all women's nude bodies, and ramming the ol' John Thomas home to ejaculation was the apex of mortal experience yes indeed. But did that define me as straight? When I was young and we were all more attractive and women were more eager for sex, then yeah for sure I would choose to be with a woman rather than a man. But having had some same-sex experiences fiddling about with my buddies as a pre-teen, I never felt that I could honestly refer to myself as "straight." What would I be then? Bisexual? Some argue there is no such thing. One is either gay or straight. No in between. Well they can go to hell. I don't believe a man would be honest if he says he's never thought about what it would be like to suck a cock. When I imagine snuggling and having my arm around someone and sleeping with that person, it's always a woman. But on the other hand the older and more broken down I get, the more I think that only another man could relate to how I feel about some things. Having sex with a man has moved onto my bucket list. I always felt it was a bridge too far, and that women would completely 86 me after that. But maybe not . Guess I'll find out.
as much as I like your scepticism .. you are going too far by actually creating the thing you hate the most ... misinformation with a little true behind it... Christianity has nothing against gays .. is people who do and take it different directions. please lower down your imagination. What you presenting is from personal representation and observation you experienced... hence your talking about is more subjective than objective ... scientific -wise very unsupported. You cant fight faith of belief with science and vice-versa...
if this was meant to warm up the hearts of your audience with another humour piece .. then perhaps you achieved it ... cheers
martinicelli cussavachi
Christianity has nothing against gays? Read Leviticus 20:13, which is the Mosaic Law that says that gay people should be killed.
In case you're one of those people who thinks that old testament law was put to an end, here is a new testament example.
Romans 1:26-27
"Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."
The due penalty here is likely referring to the old testament punishment of death in Leviticus which I referred to in the first paragraph.
As far as not being able to fight faith of belief with science, I'm not sure what you mean. If you mean that faith is an unscientific and useless way to discover truth, then I would agree. Otherwise, nobody really buys the non overlapping magisteria nonsense anymore.
As for you calling the video non-scientific, we agree on that. It is interpretation and shouldn't be taken as fact of course. Sort of a thought experiment I guess.