187. Australian Prime Ministers: Edmund Barton - Robert Menzies

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @robertbollard5475
    @robertbollard5475 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Menzies didn't start the dismantling of the Whie Australia. That move had to wait for his retirement. Incidentally the move (cautious and unofficial - it was only the Whitlam government that officially abandoned it) was motivated largely by the fact that, with Britain entering the Common Market, Australia needed new trading partners and the obvious choice was Japan.

    • @hazchemel
      @hazchemel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And the net was loosened immediately following ww2, and apparently Australia let the Baltic countries know that their applications will now be favourably considered. Their descendent Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians carry on.

    • @hazchemel
      @hazchemel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think Arthur Caldwell was Immigration Minister.

  • @daveb3987
    @daveb3987 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Australia were attacked over 100 times by Japan - people think Darwin was only bombed once. Curtin was pivotal in shifting Australia's focus.

    • @MartyH99
      @MartyH99 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Papua was part of Australia at that time - so Japan invaded part of Australia. Also Japanese military equipment was found on the Moore River in WA. I am not aware of any definitive explanation for the latter rudeness!

  • @alisonlilley3039
    @alisonlilley3039 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I went to Monash University in Melbourne in the late 70’s. One of the tallest ( and ugliest 😂) buildings was known by students (and probably lecturers) as the Ming Wing.. a reference to Menzies. Probably a reference completely lost on current students.
    And not all of us have a broad nasal Aussie accent. I still get asked ( by non Brits) if I’m English😮

    • @alisonlilley3039
      @alisonlilley3039 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The other riff on Menzie’s name - referring to an ill timed sale of steel to an Asian country just before WWII - was Pig Iron Bob.
      And yep, we were much more strongly Socialist ( pensions, universal education etc), with strong labour unions, in early Federation.

  • @anthonymorris2276
    @anthonymorris2276 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Arthur Fadden was NOT the only “interim” (caretaker) prime minister from the Country Party.
    There was Earle Page, PM for 19 or 20 days in April 1939, following the death of Joe Lyons.
    Also “Black” Jack McEwan for 22 days in December 1967 to January 1968, following the death of Harold Holt.

  • @allancarey2604
    @allancarey2604 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Don’t worry, Australians don’t know much about Australian PM’s. You won’t get much past Menzies, Whitlam & Hawke.

  • @hazchemel
    @hazchemel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fred Paterson, a Queensland Rhodes Scholar and barrister, was elected to parliament in 1944, representing a remote area for the Communist Party. He remains the sole communist party member of parliament since it's original Australian foundation in 1920.

    • @MartyH99
      @MartyH99 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Champagne socialist by the sound of it!
      No shortage of those in the Greens, ALP & Teals!

  • @blogbalkanstories4805
    @blogbalkanstories4805 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting.
    As for Robert Menzies having been considered a possible replacement for Winston Churchill: Would that even have been possible at the time, and would it be today? It strikes me as a bit unlikely that a foreigner could have been a member of a British cabinet, let alone lead one.

    • @grahamparkin5568
      @grahamparkin5568 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Chalk and Cheese!

    • @daveb3987
      @daveb3987 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Different times.

    • @blogbalkanstories4805
      @blogbalkanstories4805 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True. But would it have been legally possible?

    • @daveb3987
      @daveb3987 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Back then, yes.@@blogbalkanstories4805
      Even today, Australians who are living (even just on a temporary work pass) in the UK can vote in any election. My brother voted in the Brexit referendum.

    • @johnfernleigh1352
      @johnfernleigh1352 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In theory it was possible only because the prime minister is appointed by the monarch, who could appoint anyone, but in reality by the 1940s it would have been politically impossible to appoint someone from the House of Lords, let alone from Australia.

  • @Celtic2Realms
    @Celtic2Realms 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Heard of Joe Clark

  • @Ken-pi7qk
    @Ken-pi7qk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Perhaps a little less mockery would have improved this podcast!

    • @alisonlilley3039
      @alisonlilley3039 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They’re just jealous 😂

    • @jackthemac132
      @jackthemac132 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@alisonlilley3039 oh my antipodean friend, who isn't?

  • @matthewrobinson2172
    @matthewrobinson2172 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was the liberal party by 1949

  • @ipattison
    @ipattison 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New Zealand still superior.

  • @tonybooth4
    @tonybooth4 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the strangest podcast ever, totally misses dozens of PM'S next to useless

    • @fppf5248
      @fppf5248 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's why it's called Australian prime ministers: Edmund Barton - Robert Menzies
      And not Australian prime ministers

    • @capatheist
      @capatheist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dozens?
      Minim requirement for dozens is 24 prime ministers.
      There has been 22 prime ministers in Australia…
      Quit ya winging

    • @capatheist
      @capatheist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It also tells you they are going to be continuing it “tomorrow”
      Have some self awareness mate