Plenty of innocent people are found guilty. About 4% are believed innocent. Lets see what the innocents project comes up with. If you object to the DNA you object to justice.
He had his fair trial. He's guilty as sin. He should be embarrassed that he can't admit his wrongdoings and the innocent project is wasting their time. They should be embarrassed too
It won't do any good. It Scott's DNA is on the duct tape, he will come up with another unlikely excuse, 22 years after he had a chance to explain the duct tape the first time. If not Scott's DNA, then who's? It probably won't explain the why, when, where, method... I mean she was in water that was like a washing machine. Thousands of pieces of debris and garbage came into contact with her.
They believe that his affair with Amber Frey at the time of his wife's and unborn child's disappearance might be appalling to the jurors but not sufficient to prove his guilt in the double murder.
I think some will take slight "reasonable doubt" so far past immense "reasonably done it" just for sake of being able to. That .001% of doubt is more important than the .999% of probability I was 19/20 when this occurred - I remember it well. When I was that age I actually was one that had that benefit of the doubt for him. Back then I still believed anything was possible ... Now, not so much... I've learned a lot over the years about human behaviors and I believe he probably did this... But it's something that should stand the test of time if it's true, and if a privately funded project wants to reexamine the case, by all means they should be allowed to do so.
Because all the prosecution proved was that he was a bad human being. He was a scumbag that doesn’t make him guilty of murder cheating on your wife is called.Adultery !!! all Amber Frey proved was that he cheated again, not sufficient evidence for murder
Same. If they want to take on a case of an asshole that may have been wrongly convicted, they should look into the Murdaugh case. There's definitely reasonable doubt there, not to mention they basically tried him for his financial crimes during his murder trial. He's definitely a self-absorbed asshole and a crook, but I'm not so sure he murdered his wife and son.
Hmm....perhaps this means you're wrong about Scotts guilt. Why do you ppl assume that you're always right? The Innocence project WILL NOT take on a case unless there is DAMN good evidence of innocence. So they obviously have some evidence none of us have seen before.
@@jamielehman4934 THE Innocence Project isn't looking into this case...it's the L.A. Innocence Project. And there is a mountain of evidence pointing only to Scott Peterson as the murderer. I have ZERO doubt that he did it.
The LA Innocence Project made a mistake in choosing to fight for an amoral, properly convicted murderer. Amber Frey, a woman of courage and honor, is really the reason Scott Peterson was found guilty. Thank God for her.
Hi Amber, You DO realize they only take on cases where there is DAMN good evidence of a persons innocence, right? You also have to consider that they KNEW ppl would be outraged about them picking up this case but they did it anyway, which means they obviously have some evidence we haven't seen yet.
Amber Frey's recordings are what convicted Scott. She risked her life to do that (no hyperbole). I know she is not publicly stating so and Gloria will not reveal, but I am sure Amber is both appalled and frightened by the news that the innocence Project is trying to secure his release.
She didn't risk her life. He killed his wife to be with her. That was the motive. Now Scott is going to hurt Amber. Yeah right People always want to sensualise stuff more than it really is.
They're not necessarily trying to secure his release just yet. They're just looking into evidence that supposedly supports the theory that someone else may have murdered Lacy.
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If I murdered someone and didn't want to get caught. The first thing I'd do is put the body where the husbands alibi is. It also wouldn't make sense for Scott to dump a body and then place himself at that very spot. Some of you ppl are so f*cking stupid....🙄
Everybody knew where the cops were looking for her body anybody could have then dumped it there to frame Scott it’s not even far fetched at all it’s really simple
For those who think someone else dumped her there to frame scott...you seem to overlook these facts: The SF bay is 90 MILES from Modesto. The "real killers" would have had to drive 2 hours away, rent or steal a boat, and then motor into the bay to dump the body. At this point, there were plenty of police around searching the bay. Seems a little risky when they could have just dumped her in the Modesto foothills, huh? It's worth noting that Scott's fishing trip wasn't public for a couple days after her disappearance. So I guess they had the body laying around for days waiting for Scott's alibi to come out? Also, they weighed down the body! Why risk driving for 2 hours to the bay, stealing or renting a boat, then going out and dumping her body over, if you're just going to weigh it down so that it won't likely ever be found? Again folks, critical thinking please! Does that sound reasonable? That some burglars are going to do all that, risk getting caught/seen/pulled over, just to frame Scott by weighing the body to make it less likely it's ever found? Again...why not just bury it in the foothills near Modesto? None of this absurd theory passes the logic test whatsoever. Burglars who unintentionally kill a pregnant witness aren't going to sit around with a body for 3 days, drive with it 2 hours away, get a boat somehow, go to the middle of the bay that is already full of cops looking for her, and dump it over and risk being seen. Honestly this theory is just stupid. If the burglars did it, they'd get rid of the body and all other evidence as quickly as possible
He doesn't seem to be innocent. I know very little about the case and trial but if he was convicted and lost many appeals why would the innocence project get involved? Is there any new evidence? And why do they not already have DNA?
But if there is new evidence, then no one including Lacis family would object to knowing the truth. The truth to me means physical evidence to prove facts one way or the other.
He's guilty, no held her body and drove to the marina, by that time it was swarming with cops, search tea!s media. They would have been caught. He and he alone did it. He told Amber Laci was dead before she died. He told her that because he knew in a few weeks he would kill.her. He's CA dangerous sociopath that ish dying in prison
I can’t believe for a second that Scott didn’t murder his wife and baby boy. He’s evil in my opinion. I can’t imagine how Sharon is feeling about this. 🙏🏻
There is a lot of reasonable doubt in this case. However, Occum’s razor. There’s too many simplistic realities that point the finger right at Petersen.
@@billyc768 Go re visit the case. Specifically the timeline of the crime and some of the eye witness testimony regarding Laci and walking the dog. Also, the meth heads that had robbed the house across the street. The eye witness testimony of the people throwing Laci in the van. No DNA evidence to convict SP. The police said the house smelled of bleach. and that a single strand of Laci’s hair was found on a plier in his tool box. My house always smells of bleach and my wife’s long hair is everywhere. Don’t get me wrong. I think he’s guilty.
Come on, Gloria… the reason the prosecution didn’t want Anne Bird to testify is because she completely changed her stories. What she told the lead detective in this case initially, is the polar opposite of what she later tried to say. 🤥 Oh and Scott wasn’t “headed to Mexico”, he was headed north towards Torrey Pines Golf Course in La Jolla to meet up with his dad and brothers. But way to keep that lame media talking point alive. 🙄. And as far as the “map” found in his car… it wasn’t a map to Amber’s home. He’d already been to her place several times. It was a non-directional map that had Amber’s work address on it… another place he’d already been to so he didn’t need a map to get there either. He needed Amber’s work address to mail back a book she had sent him (that she asked him to mail back to her) that was also found in the car. Lies upon lies…
@@BlahBlah-u8z It’s the same media talking points and sound bites over and over.. given in brief snippets, without context and without giving the surrounding circumstances that were going on at the time.
She changed her (Anne Bird) story from what? The facts show she and others in his family were assisting Scott to evade anyone and everyone for months up until he was arrested, after all, he was family. However, the police knew where Scott was most of the time anyway because of a tracking device on his truck and his cell phone pings and wiretap. It was Anne's husband, Tim, who was angry at Scott, and who forced Scott out of their house that was 2 miles from the location of the bodies. The facts show Scott was on his way from San Diego to his sister's house when the dead bodies were announced. Anne was on the phone with Scott and let him know. Scott promptly turned around and headed back to San Diego; cell phone pings showed his locations. Scott then hid at Anne's parent's house, the Grady's, just as the Gradys left for a vacation. They didn't see Scott, but the house-sitter did see him and was quite surprised. Scott wasn't interested in being involved in the effort to sort out the circumstances of the dead bodies. He didn't call the Rocha family or anyone in Modesto, including the police to get a more detailed explanation. He didn't go on the news and plead for the killer(s) to turn him/her self into the police, or for anyone who knew anything to come forward. Scott may or may not have been fleeing to Mexico, but he was evading police, nonetheless. Over the next few days, Scott played a cat and mouse game with various law enforcement who were following him. He evaded police using a car and a motorcycle owned by the Gradys (I believe he stole those vehicles), and he visited his brother, John, who had bought his truck installed with the tracking device. He hid at his sister Susan's place and emerged in the red Mercedes he purchased days earlier. Then, he took the cops on a 160 mile high speed chase up to Orange County and back to San Diego where he was arrested with all that survival gear and $15,000 cash. The story about the cash is so ludicrous....how his mother "accidentally" withdrew it from Scott's bank, but didn't "accidentally" re-deposit it, and rather, chose to covertly meet Scott at an art exhibit, to hand over the "accidental" cash. Yeah... so Anne protected Scott in the beginning, but after her husband and others realized Scott did not act like a grieving husband and father, but more like a single man interested in fun and games with other women, which included offers of "flirtinis," and was guilty due to everything else, she stopped protecting him, and urged him to come clean (at the expense of losing the love of other family members).
@@BlahBlah-u8z And Scott guilty deniers don't give you even an ounce of the mountain of facts in this case. The facts show his sister Anne and others in his family were assisting Scott to evade anyone and everyone for months up until he was arrested, after all, he was family. However, the police knew where Scott was most of the time anyway because of a tracking device on his truck and his cell phone pings and wiretap. It was Anne's husband, Tim, who was angry at Scott, and who forced Scott out of their house that was 2 miles from the location of the bodies. The facts show Scott was on his way from San Diego to his sister's house when the dead bodies were announced. Anne was on the phone with Scott and let him know. Scott promptly turned around and headed back to San Diego; cell phone pings showed his locations. Scott then hid at Anne's parent's house, the Grady's, just as the Gradys left for a vacation. They didn't see Scott, but the house-sitter did see him and was quite surprised. Scott wasn't interested in being involved in the effort to sort out the circumstances of the dead bodies. He didn't call the Rocha family or anyone in Modesto, including the police to get a more detailed explanation. He didn't go on the news and plead for the killer(s) to turn him/her self into the police, or for anyone who knew anything to come forward. Scott may or may not have been fleeing to Mexico, but he was evading police, nonetheless. Over the next few days, Scott played a cat and mouse game with various law enforcement who were following him. He evaded police using a car and a motorcycle owned by the Gradys (I believe he stole those vehicles), and he visited his brother, John, who had bought his truck installed with the tracking device. He hid at his sister Susan's place and emerged in the red Mercedes he purchased days earlier. Then, he took the cops on a 160 mile high speed chase up to Orange County and back to San Diego where he was arrested with all that survival gear and $15,000 cash. The story about the cash is so ludicrous....how his mother "accidentally" withdrew it from Scott's bank, but didn't "accidentally" re-deposit it, and rather, chose to covertly meet Scott at an art exhibit, to hand over the "accidental" cash. Yeah... so Anne protected Scott in the beginning, but after her husband and others realized Scott did not act like a grieving husband and father, but more like a single man interested in fun and games with other women, which included offers of "flirtinis," and was guilty due to everything else, she stopped protecting him, and urged him to come clean (at the expense of losing the love of other family members).
Correct. There's no one else to look at, not even the burglars. The burglary at the Medina house could not have happened at the time Laci went missing before 10:18 am. The Medinas were home up to 10:30 am. This simple fact is not just overlooked by anyone who defends Scott....IT IS BURIED AMD CONCEALED, and fuels the Scott Peterson gaslight!
Common sense to you all. Who would kill somebody and dump the body miles away from their home. So many cases like this where 99% of a times that husbands did it, one example is Chris Watts who killed wife and kids so he can be with his mistress.
Also it was said to the public where he said he was that should of not been said to the public so if there was another killer that just gave them a way out to pin this on Scott I'm not saying Scott is innocent I'm just stating facts anything is possible when a person is trying to to cover their track people go to the extreme !! Btw I believe hes guilty but I also believe it wasn't proven fairly
Because there’s money for her to be made being tied to famous cases , it’s free publicity and she has all her info for future book deals , nothing but a money grabbing ambulance chaser she is
I was an ardent supporter of Peterson's conviction. I have since studied the case and have changed my position. Not only should he have been found not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but I also believe he is 100% innocent.
Does it make sense that someone else Killed Laci, drove two hours to the SF bay, got a boat somehow, drove to the middle of the bay that was already full of cops and media looking for her, then dump the body with weights to keep it from being found? None of that makes sense whatsoever. No one is going to risk all that just to frame Scott, but also weigh the body down, in an effort to keep the body ever being found. I mean, it makes a lot more sense for panicked burglars who unintentionally killed a witness to just dump the body in a ravine, bury it in the woods, place it in a dumpster, or some other nearby and more secluded body of water, don't you think? Even still, wouldn't it make more sense to just drive to the bay and toss the body near shore instead of sneaking it onto a boat and weighing it down?
He was found guilty when his affair came to the surface, but that doesn't mean he killed her. People don't just wake up after 30 years of living a happy go lucky life and decide to kill their wife???! He doesn't fit the type. People need to stop just thinking he's guilty of BOTH the affair and murder. They are two different things.
After you tell your mistress you met in November told her you are single, attend a Christmas party with her and her friend finds out you are not single and tells you to tell her the truth or she’ll do it and you tell her this Christmas will be your first without your wife and your wife goes missing in December and mistress friend tells her she sees you on the telly about your wife missing on a police tape. On your wife’s vigil you are calling your mistress telling her you are in Paris and the view is beautiful?
A mattress from a burned out van found the day after Laci went missing in an alley close to the Peterson home and behind the house connected to one of the burglars that robbed the hose across the street from the Petersons the day Laci went missing. Watch True Crime Matters ....Tara Maria gives details. A lot of info that did not come out in trial.
@@sophie8394 It is much too long to get into. People just read the papers n believe everything they are fed. Do you realize that most of us armchair detectives DO NOT KNOW 1/3 of the details?
@@sophie8394 I can absolutely answer the question. I said it is too long to get into. Why don't you go read the report released by the Intelligence Project recently? I do not have time to go over all the points that convinced me. I was sure he was guilty years back but after going over many things, n researching what I could I believe he is innocent. We do not have the same opinion So there is no point continuing. Malcolm X once said "The media can turn an innocent man into a guilty one n vice versa". He was right. What counts is the share not justice. Peace to you
Gosh, hurry up and test the darned blood !!! Get this man back out of our lives !! No more attention should be drawn to Scott! Test it, and be done ! Yes, this test should’ve been done years ago , and I thought it was?
FIRST OF ALL, KIDDIES, a court of law never determines an accused's "innocence." A court of law determines whether an accused person is found "guilty" or "not guilty." I've long been at odds with the way the Innocence Project throws that word around. It's at base emotionally manipulative and no defense attorney in his or her right mind would use the term. Second, the prosecution's case hinged on motive; the bodies surfacing when they did was a stroke of good luck and nothing more. With regard to motive, Mr. Peterson had plenty and he spelled his intentions out to his mistress in code, "My first Christmas alone," etcetera. Etcetera. But what never fails to astonish me is Ms. Peterson's alleged naivete--was she blindly oblivious to her husband's behavior? Did she never question his whereabouts? Was she threatening to leave him? None of this information has been made available to the general public. Ms. Peterson had a group of women friends--yet she apparently confided in none of them? What was really going on in that house and what finally led Mr. Peterson to carry out such an atrocity? While tabloid headlines screamed, actual, verifiable, intimate news reports never manifested. Diane Sawyer got zero information out of her interview that she hadn't had going in. This case has been deliberately made to appear tricky and confusing. Why?
DNA?? Wouldn’t his DNA be on his wife’s body, clothes, etc? They were residing in the same house, they were in close contact, etc. while it might seem the inquiry regards the DNA findings of any other individual other then him, it seems strange to imply DNA testing alone as clearance of his already secured guilty verdict. Even so if there was DNA from a different individual found/discovered, it might not remove guilt, or declare complete innocence. It seems the court process and all those involved will have to review the review of the case/investigation and any additional findings. Hopefully truth based justice is served. Laci and the baby boy deserve justice in their name and honor, their families deserve justice. God willing Truth is the basis for Justice, in every criminal case, including this case.
If Laci's bood or DNA were found in the VAN that was seen on the 24th in relation to her disappearance, that completely exonerates him. It confirms what police already knew and refused to investigate. Harshman Grogan testimony GERAGOS: And they have witnessed the incident, and don't know if they have called Modesto PD yet or not, correct? GROGAN: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. JUDGE: Does he say what time of the day that was? GERAGOS: This was at 10:08? GROGAN: That would be 10:08 a.m. GERAGOS: So, at this point, Mr. Harshman has called on the 28th at 6:50 said he saw a woman being forced into a van, gave a description of the van. Then approximately two months later a New York City police detective says, I have talked to, presumably, Harshman's wife who may have witnessed the incident, correct? GROGAN: Yes. He got the information from a friend of Miss Harshman's, Mr. Harshman's wife, I believe. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically you contacted him on May 18th, 2004, correct? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: And he, when you contacted him, he told you that the same day he called into the police department. You put it down at 12:28, right? GROGAN: Yes, based on that tip. GERAGOS: I don't think you ever saw this. I'm just going to show this to you. When I went through the tip lines, at 14789, it looks like somebody called in, but the name that was written down was Thomas Harsh. Do you see that? GROGAN: I see it. GERAGOS: Okay. You hadn't seen that before right now, had you? GROGAN: No. GERAGOS: Okay. It says, reporting that three or four days ago he saw a pregnant lady being pushed into a van. Caller given to Detective Holmes. You were not aware that Harsh had indicated that it was three or four days prior to the 28th when he had actually phoned in; isn't that correct? GROGAN: No, I don't think so. GERAGOS: Okay. This is the first time that you have seen that, because when the caller, whoever took down the information, they just wrote Harsh as opposed to Harshman, correct? GROGAN: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said that he, specifically, on the same day that he had called in, he had seen a van parked on the south side of Scenic, west of Claus, which he described as a 70s, American-made model, beige in color, correct? GROGAN: Is that the tip that you are reading from top? GERAGOS: No. I'm at 4527. GROGAN: Yes.
Did anyone else read the letters the juror Richelle Nice wrote to Scott after he was in prison? They are online, and very strange. It seems like she has a lot of mental issues and went into the case with a vendetta. She also made a lot of weird statements in the jury room and after in interviews.
I know something so salacious about Gloria and I cannot even write it here because then they'll block me from posting for the next 24 hours even if I use eloquent grammatically, correct oxford dictionary words. It is so juicy so salacious you would not in 1 million years peg her to be the type to be involved such events. Yes, multiple events this is not something Dad only happened one time this is something she belongs to. He participates in multiple times a year and you could not wrap your brain that this woman belongs to that society doing those things, but I have seen it with my own eyes
Are you kidding, this women was on a war path. Just look at her face, as if she has been the only women lied to. Maybe she shouldn't sleep with a man on the first date. And I'm not excusing Scotts behavior at all, however for God sakes keep your legs closed until you to know the guy. I know lots of women like her she will steal your husband, son, boyfriend at the drop of a dime. No way I want her as a friend or mother.
Was his mom past? How old is Scott now ; I don't believe he was the one kill lacy; so sad that baby would be grown up now why would eny one kill your nice wife; and poor baby for stupid love; 😅
Scott Peterson is exactly where he should be and he should never be set free.
Free SP
@@steelhurricane4041
Are you in love with him? 😂😂
Plenty of innocent people are found guilty. About 4% are believed innocent. Lets see what the innocents project comes up with. If you object to the DNA you object to justice.
The fact that an estimate 4% are actually innocent doesn't mean THIS case is part of that 4%.
He had his fair trial. He's guilty as sin. He should be embarrassed that he can't admit his wrongdoings and the innocent project is wasting their time. They should be embarrassed too
It won't do any good. It Scott's DNA is on the duct tape, he will come up with another unlikely excuse, 22 years after he had a chance to explain the duct tape the first time. If not Scott's DNA, then who's? It probably won't explain the why, when, where, method... I mean she was in water that was like a washing machine. Thousands of pieces of debris and garbage came into contact with her.
G
Gloria is 82 I want her doctor!!!!!
She looks great
Why on Earth would any organization take up his case for innocence ?
For the same reason some women think Chris Watt is innocent lol
They believe that his affair with Amber Frey at the time of his wife's and unborn child's disappearance might be appalling to the jurors but not sufficient to prove his guilt in the double murder.
I think some will take slight "reasonable doubt" so far past immense "reasonably done it" just for sake of being able to.
That .001% of doubt is more important than the .999% of probability
I was 19/20 when this occurred - I remember it well. When I was that age I actually was one that had that benefit of the doubt for him. Back then I still believed anything was possible ... Now, not so much... I've learned a lot over the years about human behaviors and I believe he probably did this...
But it's something that should stand the test of time if it's true, and if a privately funded project wants to reexamine the case, by all means they should be allowed to do so.
@@honeybadger3570learn how to spell
Because all the prosecution proved was that he was a bad human being. He was a scumbag that doesn’t make him guilty of murder cheating on your wife is called.Adultery !!! all Amber Frey proved was that he cheated again, not sufficient evidence for murder
Scott is guilty why are we doing this.
Of all the men wrongfully sitting in prison, some on death row, why are the resources being wasted on Scott Peterson?
Because all the hybristophilics think he is attractive. They don't defend the ugly prisoners...
Because he probably is innocent
@@luisagallarotti9188not even maybe.
I’m really annoyed the innocent project is wasting their precious resources on this murderer.
Thank a leftist
Same. If they want to take on a case of an asshole that may have been wrongly convicted, they should look into the Murdaugh case. There's definitely reasonable doubt there, not to mention they basically tried him for his financial crimes during his murder trial. He's definitely a self-absorbed asshole and a crook, but I'm not so sure he murdered his wife and son.
Hmm....perhaps this means you're wrong about Scotts guilt. Why do you ppl assume that you're always right? The Innocence project WILL NOT take on a case unless there is DAMN good evidence of innocence. So they obviously have some evidence none of us have seen before.
Well thank god your not in charge of anything
@@jamielehman4934 THE Innocence Project isn't looking into this case...it's the L.A. Innocence Project. And there is a mountain of evidence pointing only to Scott Peterson as the murderer. I have ZERO doubt that he did it.
Why does his sister need an attorney?
I was wondering that myself
To help with a book deal, of course.
The LA Innocence Project made a mistake in choosing to fight for an amoral, properly convicted murderer. Amber Frey, a woman of courage and honor, is really the reason Scott Peterson was found guilty. Thank God for her.
What a waste of money for the innocent people who are in prison, Scott isn't. Ridiculous.
That is the benefit of living in a free society. I am all for it.
Hi Amber,
You DO realize they only take on cases where there is DAMN good evidence of a persons innocence, right? You also have to consider that they KNEW ppl would be outraged about them picking up this case but they did it anyway, which means they obviously have some evidence we haven't seen yet.
@@jamielehman4934 -apparently you don’t realize what a fool you just made of yourself.
@@BlackCatBonkersBut just maybe you might be making a fool of yourself. Are you onniscient?
ga is a shameless self- promoter. She only cares about publicity. She doesn't even do the actual work. Fake lawyer.
Jealous much?
Amber Frey's recordings are what convicted Scott. She risked her life to do that (no hyperbole). I know she is not publicly stating so and Gloria will not reveal, but I am sure Amber is both appalled and frightened by the news that the innocence Project is trying to secure his release.
She didn't risk her life. He killed his wife to be with her. That was the motive. Now Scott is going to hurt Amber. Yeah right People always want to sensualise stuff more than it really is.
They're not necessarily trying to secure his release just yet. They're just looking into evidence that supposedly supports the theory that someone else may have murdered Lacy.
@@billyc768 It's * Laci
The fact her body was found the same place he went fishing is too big a coincidence to overlook.
Yes, but it was after it was all over the news that Scott went fishing there.
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If I murdered someone and didn't want to get caught. The first thing I'd do is put the body where the husbands alibi is. It also wouldn't make sense for Scott to dump a body and then place himself at that very spot. Some of you ppl are so f*cking stupid....🙄
They released his alibi on tv. They made it much easier if someone else killed her, to frame him.
Everybody knew where the cops were looking for her body anybody could have then dumped it there to frame Scott it’s not even far fetched at all it’s really simple
For those who think someone else dumped her there to frame scott...you seem to overlook these facts:
The SF bay is 90 MILES from Modesto. The "real killers" would have had to drive 2 hours away, rent or steal a boat, and then motor into the bay to dump the body. At this point, there were plenty of police around searching the bay. Seems a little risky when they could have just dumped her in the Modesto foothills, huh? It's worth noting that Scott's fishing trip wasn't public for a couple days after her disappearance. So I guess they had the body laying around for days waiting for Scott's alibi to come out? Also, they weighed down the body! Why risk driving for 2 hours to the bay, stealing or renting a boat, then going out and dumping her body over, if you're just going to weigh it down so that it won't likely ever be found? Again folks, critical thinking please! Does that sound reasonable? That some burglars are going to do all that, risk getting caught/seen/pulled over, just to frame Scott by weighing the body to make it less likely it's ever found? Again...why not just bury it in the foothills near Modesto? None of this absurd theory passes the logic test whatsoever. Burglars who unintentionally kill a pregnant witness aren't going to sit around with a body for 3 days, drive with it 2 hours away, get a boat somehow, go to the middle of the bay that is already full of cops looking for her, and dump it over and risk being seen. Honestly this theory is just stupid. If the burglars did it, they'd get rid of the body and all other evidence as quickly as possible
He doesn't seem to be innocent. I know very little about the case and trial but if he was convicted and lost many appeals why would the innocence project get involved? Is there any new evidence? And why do they not already have DNA?
I know cases where the person lost all appeals and were innocent. I am not saying Scott is, but it is normal.
watch a documentary on him. Its quite fascinating, his behaviour. Most definately guilty
Scott IS guilty. At very least he has been in jail for 20 years and he will continue to be because there is NO reasonable doubt in this case.
But if there is new evidence, then no one including Lacis family would object to knowing the truth. The truth to me means physical evidence to prove facts one way or the other.
He's guilty, no held her body and drove to the marina, by that time it was swarming with cops, search tea!s media. They would have been caught. He and he alone did it. He told Amber Laci was dead before she died. He told her that because he knew in a few weeks he would kill.her. He's CA dangerous sociopath that ish dying in prison
I agree. He has a right to get dna test.
I can’t believe for a second that Scott didn’t murder his wife and baby boy. He’s evil in my opinion.
I can’t imagine how Sharon is feeling about this. 🙏🏻
like you said it is your opinion. Your opinion means nothing. We want real justice for Laci and Connor.
There is a lot of reasonable doubt in this case. However, Occum’s razor. There’s too many simplistic realities that point the finger right at Petersen.
Not sure there’s a lot of reasonable doubt
There actually isn't any REASONABLE doubt in this case.
@@billyc768 Go re visit the case. Specifically the timeline of the crime and some of the eye witness testimony regarding Laci and walking the dog. Also, the meth heads that had robbed the house across the street. The eye witness testimony of the people throwing Laci in the van. No DNA evidence to convict SP. The police said the house smelled of bleach. and that a single strand of Laci’s hair was found on a plier in his tool box. My house always smells of bleach and my wife’s long hair is everywhere. Don’t get me wrong. I think he’s guilty.
Too many coincidences 🤷🏼♂️
Come on, Gloria… the reason the prosecution didn’t want Anne Bird to testify is because she completely changed her stories. What she told the lead detective in this case initially, is the polar opposite of what she later tried to say. 🤥
Oh and Scott wasn’t “headed to Mexico”, he was headed north towards Torrey Pines Golf Course in La Jolla to meet up with his dad and brothers. But way to keep that lame media talking point alive. 🙄. And as far as the “map” found in his car… it wasn’t a map to Amber’s home. He’d already been to her place several times. It was a non-directional map that had Amber’s work address on it… another place he’d already been to so he didn’t need a map to get there either. He needed Amber’s work address to mail back a book she had sent him (that she asked him to mail back to her) that was also found in the car.
Lies upon lies…
Thank you! No one mentions any of this when they throw out these talking points.
@@BlahBlah-u8z It’s the same media talking points and sound bites over and over.. given in brief snippets, without context and without giving the surrounding circumstances that were going on at the time.
Yes!❤
She changed her (Anne Bird) story from what? The facts show she and others in his family were assisting Scott to evade anyone and everyone for months up until he was arrested, after all, he was family. However, the police knew where Scott was most of the time anyway because of a tracking device on his truck and his cell phone pings and wiretap. It was Anne's husband, Tim, who was angry at Scott, and who forced Scott out of their house that was 2 miles from the location of the bodies. The facts show Scott was on his way from San Diego to his sister's house when the dead bodies were announced. Anne was on the phone with Scott and let him know. Scott promptly turned around and headed back to San Diego; cell phone pings showed his locations. Scott then hid at Anne's parent's house, the Grady's, just as the Gradys left for a vacation. They didn't see Scott, but the house-sitter did see him and was quite surprised. Scott wasn't interested in being involved in the effort to sort out the circumstances of the dead bodies. He didn't call the Rocha family or anyone in Modesto, including the police to get a more detailed explanation. He didn't go on the news and plead for the killer(s) to turn him/her self into the police, or for anyone who knew anything to come forward.
Scott may or may not have been fleeing to Mexico, but he was evading police, nonetheless.
Over the next few days, Scott played a cat and mouse game with various law enforcement who were following him. He evaded police using a car and a motorcycle owned by the Gradys (I believe he stole those vehicles), and he visited his brother, John, who had bought his truck installed with the tracking device. He hid at his sister Susan's place and emerged in the red Mercedes he purchased days earlier. Then, he took the cops on a 160 mile high speed chase up to Orange County and back to San Diego where he was arrested with all that survival gear and $15,000 cash. The story about the cash is so ludicrous....how his mother "accidentally" withdrew it from Scott's bank, but didn't "accidentally" re-deposit it, and rather, chose to covertly meet Scott at an art exhibit, to hand over the "accidental" cash.
Yeah... so Anne protected Scott in the beginning, but after her husband and others realized Scott did not act like a grieving husband and father, but more like a single man interested in fun and games with other women, which included offers of "flirtinis," and was guilty due to everything else, she stopped protecting him, and urged him to come clean (at the expense of losing the love of other family members).
@@BlahBlah-u8z And Scott guilty deniers don't give you even an ounce of the mountain of facts in this case. The facts show his sister Anne and others in his family were assisting Scott to evade anyone and everyone for months up until he was arrested, after all, he was family. However, the police knew where Scott was most of the time anyway because of a tracking device on his truck and his cell phone pings and wiretap. It was Anne's husband, Tim, who was angry at Scott, and who forced Scott out of their house that was 2 miles from the location of the bodies. The facts show Scott was on his way from San Diego to his sister's house when the dead bodies were announced. Anne was on the phone with Scott and let him know. Scott promptly turned around and headed back to San Diego; cell phone pings showed his locations. Scott then hid at Anne's parent's house, the Grady's, just as the Gradys left for a vacation. They didn't see Scott, but the house-sitter did see him and was quite surprised. Scott wasn't interested in being involved in the effort to sort out the circumstances of the dead bodies. He didn't call the Rocha family or anyone in Modesto, including the police to get a more detailed explanation. He didn't go on the news and plead for the killer(s) to turn him/her self into the police, or for anyone who knew anything to come forward.
Scott may or may not have been fleeing to Mexico, but he was evading police, nonetheless.
Over the next few days, Scott played a cat and mouse game with various law enforcement who were following him. He evaded police using a car and a motorcycle owned by the Gradys (I believe he stole those vehicles), and he visited his brother, John, who had bought his truck installed with the tracking device. He hid at his sister Susan's place and emerged in the red Mercedes he purchased days earlier. Then, he took the cops on a 160 mile high speed chase up to Orange County and back to San Diego where he was arrested with all that survival gear and $15,000 cash. The story about the cash is so ludicrous....how his mother "accidentally" withdrew it from Scott's bank, but didn't "accidentally" re-deposit it, and rather, chose to covertly meet Scott at an art exhibit, to hand over the "accidental" cash.
Yeah... so Anne protected Scott in the beginning, but after her husband and others realized Scott did not act like a grieving husband and father, but more like a single man interested in fun and games with other women, which included offers of "flirtinis," and was guilty due to everything else, she stopped protecting him, and urged him to come clean (at the expense of losing the love of other family members).
Somebody opened her eyes waaaaay too much.
There’s about 10 red flags in this case. There’s a mountain of evidence. He’s the last person who should be looked at.
What?
Correct. There's no one else to look at, not even the burglars. The burglary at the Medina house could not have happened at the time Laci went missing before 10:18 am. The Medinas were home up to 10:30 am. This simple fact is not just overlooked by anyone who defends Scott....IT IS BURIED AMD CONCEALED, and fuels the Scott Peterson gaslight!
Common sense to you all. Who would kill somebody and dump the body miles away from their home. So many cases like this where 99% of a times that husbands did it, one example is Chris Watts who killed wife and kids so he can be with his mistress.
Chuck Stuart in Boston
I read somewhere that witnesses had seen him else where well away fromm the scene
How is that? He went fishing in his boat, and his wife was found same area he was with the boat. Same waters.
Also it was said to the public where he said he was that should of not been said to the public so if there was another killer that just gave them a way out to pin this on Scott I'm not saying Scott is innocent I'm just stating facts anything is possible when a person is trying to to cover their track people go to the extreme !! Btw I believe hes guilty but I also believe it wasn't proven fairly
Does Gloria Albred just go around “representing” women who aren’t on trial? Why would Scott Peterson’s sister need any kind of representation?
Please explain that to me as well.
Exactly and what kind of sister publicly goes on a witch hunt for their half brother when they don’t have a clue.
Because there’s money for her to be made being tied to famous cases , it’s free publicity and she has all her info for future book deals , nothing but a money grabbing ambulance chaser she is
Rumors are she's a double agent and government spy
She represented Amber Frye, Scott’s mistress
Didn't see this coming.
I didn't see it coming either.
Same
Gloria the ambulance chaser!
Free Scott.
I was an ardent supporter of Peterson's conviction. I have since studied the case and have changed my position. Not only should he have been found not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but I also believe he is 100% innocent.
What convinces you that he is innocent and who do you suspect killed and dumped Lacy? Asking earnestly.
Same. He's a creep for sure, but he's not a murderer.
@@KaileyB616 what convinced you of his innocence?
I have doubts, but I would not say he is innocent.
@Grinchy-girl he needs to be a magician to do that by himself inside that little boat. 4 anchors, Scott plus a dead body? No way.
The Innocence Project must need media attention because taking up his case is truly a lost cause. Guilty
Look, as a woman I’m glad she helped Amber Fry yet let’s finally give this man a fair chance to prove his innocence.
Or…prove himself guilty.
Does it make sense that someone else Killed Laci, drove two hours to the SF bay, got a boat somehow, drove to the middle of the bay that was already full of cops and media looking for her, then dump the body with weights to keep it from being found? None of that makes sense whatsoever. No one is going to risk all that just to frame Scott, but also weigh the body down, in an effort to keep the body ever being found. I mean, it makes a lot more sense for panicked burglars who unintentionally killed a witness to just dump the body in a ravine, bury it in the woods, place it in a dumpster, or some other nearby and more secluded body of water, don't you think? Even still, wouldn't it make more sense to just drive to the bay and toss the body near shore instead of sneaking it onto a boat and weighing it down?
Guilty in a modernized democracy, but not in a strong republic.
Let's remember how everyone blamed the Ramsay's for their daughters death and were wrong.
I don't think so....
Nothing ever proved they didnt
I don’t understand why they’re taking this on!
He was found guilty when his affair came to the surface, but that doesn't mean he killed her. People don't just wake up after 30 years of living a happy go lucky life and decide to kill their wife???! He doesn't fit the type. People need to stop just thinking he's guilty of BOTH the affair and murder. They are two different things.
He’s a narcissist. He’s exactly the type. Murderer.
After you tell your mistress you met in November told her you are single, attend a Christmas party with her and her friend finds out you are not single and tells you to tell her the truth or she’ll do it and you tell her this Christmas will be your first without your wife and your wife goes missing in December and mistress friend tells her she sees you on the telly about your wife missing on a police tape. On your wife’s vigil you are calling your mistress telling her you are in Paris and the view is beautiful?
Ever hear of Chris Watts?
I agree with Eric....❤
Even SP own sister wrote a book about his guilt.😮😮
That’s ironic - Ms Pro-Abortion Attorney is talking about an unborn child no longer being alive
Barry Scheck started the Innocence Network
He said he lost his wife ? There is no way he would know that beforehand....scott is a narcissistic man
Allred looks good.
Let Peterson out, is wrong 🤮🤮🤮🤮
Well if they found evidence that he didn’t do it then the innocent project should take this case.
There is no evidence that he didn't do it.
I agree with Gloria Allred that she loves Ashleigh Banfield!! I always watch her on TH-cam!
I was never comfortable that Scott Peterson was convicted with only circumstantial evidence.
Years and years of convictions with only circumstantial evidence. In fact it is to be considered as important as physical evidence.
me either❤
Finally! I don't believe he's guilty.
Seriously? 😂😜🤣
Good for her for at least recognizing his right to more forensic testing
why you commenting on this in everywhere i have looked hes guilty end of ya toe sucker
You've got to be slow, so I'll let you be 🥴
@@illmakeufamous6776 great arguement! 50 points to gryffindor!
DNA test to compare with what? What DNA was recovered?
I know she was in the water DNA would be washed away.
She is not nice. If she was the victim and family she will not be for the murderer. This attorney is all about money sure she supports the murderer.
Shades of ‘Gone Girl.’
Except Lacy was really murdered.
What is the DNA from?
The bottom of some dudes shoes who don't know it yet.
A mattress from a burned out van found the day after Laci went missing in an alley close to the Peterson home and behind the house connected to one of the burglars that robbed the hose across the street from the Petersons the day Laci went missing. Watch True Crime Matters ....Tara Maria gives details. A lot of info that did not come out in trial.
Gloria, you still look so great!
Money buys you good doctors
I dunno. Her eyes are kinda wonky.
Amber has no comment on the fact that Scott Peterson is innocent thats odd she sure was chatty when she helped put him on death row
Oh she is Frey's lawyer. Thst explains the lies she is telling
What lies is she telling?
@@sophie8394 It is much too long to get into. People just read the papers n believe everything they are fed. Do you realize that most of us armchair detectives DO NOT KNOW 1/3 of the details?
@@luisagallarotti9188 so, you can't answer the question. 👌
That's what I expected.
@@sophie8394 I can absolutely answer the question. I said it is too long to get into. Why don't you go read the report released by the Intelligence Project recently? I do not have time to go over all the points that convinced me. I was sure he was guilty years back but after going over many things, n researching what I could I believe he is innocent. We do not have the same opinion
So there is no point continuing.
Malcolm X once said "The media can turn an innocent man into a guilty one n vice versa". He was right. What counts is the share not justice. Peace to you
@@luisagallarotti9188 okay. Tell me one lie Gloria Allred is telling.
If Amber was speaking the truth, she would have never gotten the nose job
A bad smell that will not go away
Gosh, hurry up and test the darned blood !!! Get this man back out of our lives !! No more attention should be drawn to Scott! Test it, and be done ! Yes, this test should’ve been done years ago , and I thought it was?
FIRST OF ALL, KIDDIES, a court of law never determines an accused's "innocence." A court of law determines whether an accused person is found "guilty" or "not guilty." I've long been at odds with the way the Innocence Project throws that word around. It's at base emotionally manipulative and no defense attorney in his or her right mind would use the term. Second, the prosecution's case hinged on motive; the bodies surfacing when they did was a stroke of good luck and nothing more. With regard to motive, Mr. Peterson had plenty and he spelled his intentions out to his mistress in code, "My first Christmas alone," etcetera. Etcetera. But what never fails to astonish me is Ms. Peterson's alleged naivete--was she blindly oblivious to her husband's behavior? Did she never question his whereabouts? Was she threatening to leave him? None of this information has been made available to the general public. Ms. Peterson had a group of women friends--yet she apparently confided in none of them? What was really going on in that house and what finally led Mr. Peterson to carry out such an atrocity? While tabloid headlines screamed, actual, verifiable, intimate news reports never manifested. Diane Sawyer got zero information out of her interview that she hadn't had going in. This case has been deliberately made to appear tricky and confusing. Why?
A court never determines innocence
what is going on with Gloria and where and what she is looking at ? I would say it's about vanity ..... ?
He deserves the Jeffrey Epstien test!!!
DNA?? Wouldn’t his DNA be on his wife’s body, clothes, etc? They were residing in the same house, they were in close contact, etc.
while it might seem the inquiry regards the DNA findings of any other individual other then him, it seems strange to imply DNA testing alone as clearance of his already secured guilty verdict. Even so if there was DNA from a different individual found/discovered, it might not remove guilt, or declare complete innocence. It seems the court process and all those involved will have to review the review of the case/investigation and any additional findings. Hopefully truth based justice is served. Laci and the baby boy deserve justice in their name and honor, their families deserve justice. God willing Truth is the basis for Justice, in every criminal case, including this case.
If Laci's bood or DNA were found in the VAN that was seen on the 24th in relation to her disappearance, that completely exonerates him. It confirms what police already knew and refused to investigate.
Harshman Grogan testimony
GERAGOS: And they have witnessed the incident, and don't know if they have called Modesto PD yet or not, correct?
GROGAN: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay.
JUDGE: Does he say what time of the day that was?
GERAGOS: This was at 10:08?
GROGAN: That would be 10:08 a.m.
GERAGOS: So, at this point, Mr. Harshman has called on the 28th at 6:50 said he saw a woman being forced into a van, gave a description of the van. Then approximately two months later a New York City police detective says, I have talked to, presumably, Harshman's wife who may have witnessed the incident, correct?
GROGAN: Yes. He got the information from a friend of Miss Harshman's, Mr. Harshman's wife, I believe.
GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically you contacted him on May 18th, 2004, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And he, when you contacted him, he told you that the same day he called into the police department. You put it down at 12:28, right?
GROGAN: Yes, based on that tip.
GERAGOS: I don't think you ever saw this. I'm just going to show this to you. When I went through the tip lines, at 14789, it looks like somebody called in, but the name that was written down was Thomas Harsh. Do you see that?
GROGAN: I see it.
GERAGOS: Okay. You hadn't seen that before right now, had you?
GROGAN: No.
GERAGOS: Okay. It says, reporting that three or four days ago he saw a pregnant lady being pushed into a van. Caller given to Detective Holmes. You were not aware that Harsh had indicated that it was three or four days prior to the 28th when he had actually phoned in; isn't that correct?
GROGAN: No, I don't think so.
GERAGOS: Okay. This is the first time that you have seen that, because when the caller, whoever took down the information, they just wrote Harsh as opposed to Harshman, correct?
GROGAN: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he said that he, specifically, on the same day that he had called in, he had seen a van parked on the south side of Scenic, west of Claus, which he described as a 70s, American-made model, beige in color, correct?
GROGAN: Is that the tip that you are reading from top?
GERAGOS: No. I'm at 4527.
GROGAN: Yes.
Looking at his side girlfriend, I am convinced he's guilty. He upgraded, clearly did'nt want the economic burden of divorce.
WHAT really happened to LacEE🤔🤔🤔🤔
Did anyone else read the letters the juror Richelle Nice wrote to Scott after he was in prison? They are online, and very strange. It seems like she has a lot of mental issues and went into the case with a vendetta. She also made a lot of weird statements in the jury room and after in interviews.
I met Gloria Allred and Amber Frey at a book signing. They both were the nicest ladies, very friendly and down to earth.
Gloria has one of the most annoying voices😂
I know something so salacious about Gloria and I cannot even write it here because then they'll block me from posting for the next 24 hours even if I use eloquent grammatically, correct oxford dictionary words. It is so juicy so salacious you would not in 1 million years peg her to be the type to be involved such events. Yes, multiple events this is not something Dad only happened one time this is something she belongs to. He participates in multiple times a year and you could not wrap your brain that this woman belongs to that society doing those things, but I have seen it with my own eyes
Wow so juicy. I have been blocked also for 24 hours because I said something about Sara Gilbert in defense of Rosanne.
Gloria Allred is an ambulance chaser
😂
No matter the outcome Amber is the kind of woman we should all hope to have as a friend or mother.
Are you kidding, this women was on a war path. Just look at her face, as if she has been the only women lied to. Maybe she shouldn't sleep with a man on the first date. And I'm not excusing Scotts behavior at all, however for God sakes keep your legs closed until you to know the guy. I know lots of women like her she will steal your husband, son, boyfriend at the drop of a dime. No way I want her as a friend or mother.
Plastic surgery!
Eat a little crow.
Was his mom past? How old is Scott now ; I don't believe he was the one kill lacy; so sad that baby would be grown up now why would eny one kill your nice wife; and poor baby for stupid love; 😅
I will now NEVER listen to you gain, he is exaktly where he should be and you should be ashamed you think otherwise. Poor lacys family
Who?
FREE SCOTT! When Scott gets out I hope he sues tf outta these evil people and never has to work another day in his life!
He’s never getting out.
@@calliefisher8558 you don’t know that
@@GarrettPederson253 well they aren’t going to find any evidence in a burnt van because he killed her and dumped her in the bay….
FREE CHRIS WATTS!
😂 On my gosh you are bad.
That's a real movement