I think they've got higher priorities to focus on. Maybe down the road they can shift to realistic damage but for now, adding content and gameplay/simulation features are the focus.
They have a lot of things to do yet the only thing they focus on is grabbing money. SAMs are unrealistic and have an iq of 2 not a threat at all, anything outside of cockpit looks like a 2009 game just looks at the moden of an infantry soldier or a random building next to the airport shit is barely half modelled
Yeah... DCS needs a LOT of things fixed/worked on. Ain't gonna happen. All they care about is making money so that means Early Access Pre-order, soon as that's released forget about it and work on the next EA Pre-order, and so on and so on. I honestly believe DCS it's nearing end of life. Especially after the whole Razbam thing, and now Heatblur(again). Mission/Campaign creators are also abandoning the game too so... Yeah. Nick needs to smarten the hell up or he isn't gonna be making any money off of 3rd party devs at all soon.
They need cash as ours planes need some precious fuel😊 Maybe and l really hope they want release maximum of fixed/rotary wings, ships, ground vehicle etc to focus later date on their corrections while they introduce new gameplay since they are obviously working on new infantry animation we could have on the battlefield some players playing leadership on ia infantries able to act as soldiers or driving units (tanks, apc etc) this will definitely change current multiplayer gameplay 🥰
There will have always some can land and other can destroy or heavily damage their plane. And with upcoming features on SuperCarrier if it have not been canceled ( www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/2021-04-02/ ) it will be closer to real life. th-cam.com/video/0p85dJMsXIk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=42F_snR57vsqAmfU By the way l m not sure we have effects and consequences on plane which have overpass his structural integrity during ACM except 15g turn 🫣 l saw several times was due to lag 🤔 Of course not all should be add for tomorrow but plan for futur. From LockOn to DCS the physics in my opinion took a step forward hope it will continue 🥰
Even if damage model have been greatly improve since LOMAC in my opinion it is still not complete because l never saw yet my plane or another plane (IA or human) sufferer such damage in game at the moment th-cam.com/video/JOqXIjHjX3w/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EBsWgFhavvh5D9vp
If you wanna sound like you know what you're talking about to correct someone who didn't ask to be corrected, just quote the flight manual instead of guessing. You're wrong. You use the stick for rolling left and right. It should be in place holding the correct AoA, not being used for pitch anymore. Using the throttle to control speed, decent, and where the Velocity Vector is pointing.
I did not test this but l think it have not been include th-cam.com/video/Gt-jMhmUonA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=wAzHriQQTrtzkR9h There is many modeling still not link to our legend as was real one. As wings’ vapor or sonic boom cone If l m not wrong it should be plan to be added but no update on them🥺
crashing is NOT immersion it means you need to reload a FLIGHT! Aviate, Navigate, Communicate and maintain control of your aircraft at all times.@@petrmitchell4442
Digital COMBAT Simulator Simulating combat should include realistic damage models. Even the folks at 1CGS can do it with IL-2. It's kind of sad that IL-2 has a better damage model. It's pathetic actually.
I also love how people never focus on the problem you're trying to address and just absolutely have to correct what you're doing instead. That sh*t is so annoying. People do that crap to me ALL the time when I'm trying to point out flaws and bugs in the game. Don't worry about his fkn flying, worry about the entire aircraft clipping through the carrier and showing no damage other than a busted engine.
It maybe specific incident what really happens but did you already remember to see your tomcat in dcs like that after crash ? theaviationgeekclub.com/heres-why-this-f-14a-tomcat-split-into-two-pieces/amp/
If you play with early access it’s to help report bugs🤔 Personally l use stable release while l think most other preferred open beta. About MSFS indeed it will be great but so far l remember fsx superbug (no damage at all during bvr) To fs98 to MSFS 2020 you only have text msg notified you crash or overpass Gsload your plane stay in good shape well as Gran turismo 🤧
Translation: Cut Pass Emphasis All Fouled Up All The Way Long In Groove Lined Up Right Emphasis Out of the Turn Right To Left Emphasis In Middle Nose Down Emphasis In Close Not Enough Altitude Emphasis At Ramp Nose Down Emphasis Left Wing Down Emphasis To Land
@@petrmitchell4442 Gotta start somewhere. Figured you needed some LSO feedback. Work on getting on speed and use DLC to get rid of your altitude without changing your attitude. Case I procedure takes time to get down, but is massively satisfying once you do. Work on it piece by piece. I’d suggest starting by getting your downwind into the turn to the groove, by stretching it some. Stretching your downwind is frowned upon in a busy environment, however. That’s why Long in the Groove is an issue
Might need to work bit on the landing to avoid being court martial for crashing a $50 million piece of metal....
I m not perfect yet 😔 but that was hopefully not me. I usually do wave off if l m too low to hit ramp. Velocity vector is useful 🥰
Can’t be court martialed if you don’t survive the initial Impact.
@@ARSAMES007 l guess it should be cheaper than inflation counted on f18😏
I think they've got higher priorities to focus on. Maybe down the road they can shift to realistic damage but for now, adding content and gameplay/simulation features are the focus.
You right except l did it wrong l was unable to provide laser for ia tomcat while l was using humvee l feel a lil disappointed 😢
I would think that a realistic damage model is a key component for a simulation of any form of combat.
@@majorborngusfluunduch8694 Visual vs simulated?
They have a lot of things to do yet the only thing they focus on is grabbing money. SAMs are unrealistic and have an iq of 2 not a threat at all, anything outside of cockpit looks like a 2009 game just looks at the moden of an infantry soldier or a random building next to the airport shit is barely half modelled
You mean visual Vs scripted?
I thought it was IRL for a sec...
Dcs ocean is beautiful almost as irl🥰
until it no clip into the floor and land in the sea
Yeah thought the real life damage model was wrong too
"You're long in the groove- depart and re-enter."
I will keep that in mind for my future trap thx 😊
I don't know, it looks sufficiently F'd up to me...
It’s better than Lomac 😆but still away from reality
Man, I gotta play this game. Loved planes all my life, grew up playing MSFS 2000, European Air War, Ace Combat. Just need a good PC.
It's got a learning curve to it. I do it in VR. Very nice. Should try trapping in bad weather at night. Real challenge.
@@icecold9511 sounds incredible tbh
@@Heliosphan33 it is, ive spent hours running ILS case 3 in fkn hurricanes lmao
DCS and it's damage models xd Welcome to the 1st wire at best party :D
I caught several time this one as 4 and 3 🥰
bit low and agressive decent rate, close tho.
Dlc on and good trim are best things to land it as irl so sweet th-cam.com/video/7isnvxX5DK4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9qZNlmtGtSVb81v-
I thought this was real life for a second, not going to lie
The blue ocean and deep sky is indeed so realistic they do any amazing job🥰
Thought it was gonna ramp strike, instead it was BOOOOOING
They should use the Carrier Command landing procedure. 😉
What do you mean, that's totally realistic by the way please buy our brand New module Ka-50-4
Not enough in my point of view. Hm ka50 4? U mean ka50 3 right ?
bit long in the groove, there, Maverick...
It was not me but l m also not following the time in groove 😏
Nice flyin', ace
😂
Was this Stevie Wonder having a go at flying a sim?
Yeah... DCS needs a LOT of things fixed/worked on. Ain't gonna happen. All they care about is making money so that means Early Access Pre-order, soon as that's released forget about it and work on the next EA Pre-order, and so on and so on. I honestly believe DCS it's nearing end of life. Especially after the whole Razbam thing, and now Heatblur(again). Mission/Campaign creators are also abandoning the game too so... Yeah. Nick needs to smarten the hell up or he isn't gonna be making any money off of 3rd party devs at all soon.
They need cash as ours planes need some precious fuel😊
Maybe and l really hope they want release maximum of fixed/rotary wings, ships, ground vehicle etc to focus later date on their corrections while they introduce new gameplay since they are obviously working on new infantry animation we could have on the battlefield some players playing leadership on ia infantries able to act as soldiers or driving units (tanks, apc etc) this will definitely change current multiplayer gameplay 🥰
captain pete "maverick" mitchell
Not yet
Why should i care about damage ? I am gonna land it not destroy it.
There will have always some can land and other can destroy or heavily damage their plane.
And with upcoming features on SuperCarrier if it have not been canceled ( www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/2021-04-02/ ) it will be closer to real life.
th-cam.com/video/0p85dJMsXIk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=42F_snR57vsqAmfU
By the way l m not sure we have effects and consequences on plane which have overpass his structural integrity during ACM except 15g turn 🫣 l saw several times was due to lag 🤔
Of course not all should be add for tomorrow but plan for futur.
From LockOn to DCS the physics in my opinion took a step forward hope it will continue 🥰
Nice work, keep it up
This landing wasn’t done by me 😇
Damage model is perfectly fine wherever it is
Even if damage model have been greatly improve since LOMAC in my opinion it is still not complete because l never saw yet my plane or another plane (IA or human) sufferer such damage in game at the moment th-cam.com/video/JOqXIjHjX3w/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EBsWgFhavvh5D9vp
@@petrmitchell4442I meant damage model was not in that aircraft and is perfectly fine wherever it is
@@moiluck all time all situation fuselage stay interger except missing nose for F15 and sukhoi if remember right but that all😖
🤧
How dare you
You try to kill the poor Jester
I try to avoid it that but cannot promise 😔
Try not to use ur stick at the end just line up and control with thrust
If you wanna sound like you know what you're talking about to correct someone who didn't ask to be corrected, just quote the flight manual instead of guessing. You're wrong. You use the stick for rolling left and right. It should be in place holding the correct AoA, not being used for pitch anymore. Using the throttle to control speed, decent, and where the Velocity Vector is pointing.
@@RedTail1-1 thats what i said
Incomplete maybe?
I did not test this but l think it have not been include th-cam.com/video/Gt-jMhmUonA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=wAzHriQQTrtzkR9h
There is many modeling still not link to our legend as was real one.
As wings’ vapor or sonic boom cone If l m not wrong it should be plan to be added but no update on them🥺
flight simulator not damage simulator Hint: its in the name....
Yeah go play beamng for damage sim
Oh nice thx for info that looks indeed pretty realistic cannot wait to see that in dcs or in other game🥰
That is Microsoft but both of them should intregrated that in their game maybe not now but soon to increase more immersion 😁
crashing is NOT immersion it means you need to reload a FLIGHT! Aviate, Navigate, Communicate and maintain control of your aircraft at all times.@@petrmitchell4442
Digital COMBAT Simulator
Simulating combat should include realistic damage models. Even the folks at 1CGS can do it with IL-2. It's kind of sad that IL-2 has a better damage model. It's pathetic actually.
Your spinal cord problems are not service related.
😂 no way they need to do something for
For sure that, bro. What knee problem? What neck problem? What ringing in the ears? Bad back? Suck up, ruck up and move out.
I also love how people never focus on the problem you're trying to address and just absolutely have to correct what you're doing instead. That sh*t is so annoying. People do that crap to me ALL the time when I'm trying to point out flaws and bugs in the game.
Don't worry about his fkn flying, worry about the entire aircraft clipping through the carrier and showing no damage other than a busted engine.
by seeing the shadow and the shape of the shadow I have concluded you are flying an f15
No it’s is an F14. But l need to admit seeing weird 🤧 shadow after f14 release 4 years ago now shadow have been updated.
looks pretty normal to me...
It maybe specific incident what really happens but did you already remember to see your tomcat in dcs like that after crash ?
theaviationgeekclub.com/heres-why-this-f-14a-tomcat-split-into-two-pieces/amp/
#Realism
This game has been in early access for fourteen years. If Microsoft announced Combat Flight Sim 4 this game would be toast!
If you play with early access it’s to help report bugs🤔
Personally l use stable release while l think most other preferred open beta.
About MSFS indeed it will be great but so far l remember fsx superbug (no damage at all during bvr)
To fs98 to MSFS 2020 you only have text msg notified you crash or overpass Gsload your plane stay in good shape well as Gran turismo 🤧
00:32
_C_ AFU AW LIG _LUR_ OT _RTL_ IM _ND_ IC _NEA_ AR _ND_ _DLW_ TL
Translation:
Cut Pass Emphasis
All Fouled Up All The Way
Long In Groove
Lined Up Right Emphasis Out of the Turn
Right To Left Emphasis In Middle
Nose Down Emphasis In Close
Not Enough Altitude Emphasis At Ramp
Nose Down Emphasis Left Wing Down Emphasis To Land
😂
@@petrmitchell4442 Gotta start somewhere. Figured you needed some LSO feedback. Work on getting on speed and use DLC to get rid of your altitude without changing your attitude.
Case I procedure takes time to get down, but is massively satisfying once you do. Work on it piece by piece. I’d suggest starting by getting your downwind into the turn to the groove, by stretching it some.
Stretching your downwind is frowned upon in a busy environment, however. That’s why Long in the Groove is an issue
@@leighbellouny3904 Thx l will get a look to that in my next practice 😊
I hate these fake videos…
Will you prefer stay on old graphics th-cam.com/video/rkau5cX_ABk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=0OpDG2_QuihNGoKA 🥹
it some how got worse and more incompetent every 3 seconds.
This pilot maybe did not had enough carrier practice maybe he was tired or stressed leading to fail his landing.