Tested: Hover Camera Quadcopter Drone

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ต.ค. 2016
  • Support videos like this -- and get a free gift -- by becoming a Tested Premium Member: tested.com/membership
    We review the Hover Camera Passport, a lightweight foldable quadcopter that uses computer vision technology to track your face and body as it flies around you. We love its sturdy compact design and ease of use, and take the drone out for test flights around the city. Here's what we think of the resulting footage.
    Shot and edited by Norman Chan
    Subscribe for more videos! th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
    Follow us on Twitter: / testedcom
    Get updates on Facebook: / testedcom
    Tested is:
    Adam Savage / donttrythis
    Norman Chan / nchan
    Simone Giertz / simonegiertz
    Joey Fameli / joeyfameli
    Adam Isaak / adamisaak
    Kishore Hari / sciencequiche
    Frank Ippolito / frankippolito
    Sean Charlesworth / cworthdynamics
    Jeremy Williams / jerware
    Patrick Norton / patricknorton
    Thanks for watching!
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 646

  • @tested
    @tested  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoy tech? Check out Projections, our series about AR and VR: bit.ly/2ufaYr2

  • @anononomous
    @anononomous 7 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Such a neat clean design.

  • @therealchicken7395
    @therealchicken7395 7 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    550$? Fuck that, you can buy the dji phantom 3 advanced for that much

    • @MrJest2
      @MrJest2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was my question - what the price was. I realize reviewers can't give exact prices, but a ball-park or MSRP would be good enough to compare this with, say, a $3000 quad. Without the pricing I can't judge the quality vs. dollars trade off if I am in the market for something cheaper, and am willing to put up with some deficits in order to save bucks. It's annoying (although, yes, hardly a chore) to go look it up separately after watching a review.

    • @Palewolf
      @Palewolf 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The price is shown at 0:42

    • @jfbeam
      @jfbeam 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. Why do all these crapcopters have so little technology but such a huge price tag? There are cellphones at half the price with far more capabilities -- and they have an expensive cellular subsystem drones don't need.

    • @jahbones
      @jahbones 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's not the point though, the point is for it to be super portable. Which the dji phantom isn't compared to this.

    • @Crokto
      @Crokto 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      mavic is a couple hundred bucks more though

  • @jfncho
    @jfncho 7 ปีที่แล้ว +149

    cool idea, but image quality looks like a front facing camera on an older gen phone.

    • @minihjalte
      @minihjalte 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah its very bad.

    • @Cloxxki
      @Cloxxki 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Indeed. While I've never bought any "copter" before (I just fold a piece of paper and toss it off a tall structure to see it flikker up to a km away, above the horizon), I've been following trends a little bit. If I'd get a copter thingy, I'd want to it reliably track doing cross-country skiing, mountainbiking, running, and the like. With very few interactions/instructions. Or just short voice commands. And make good footage. It should be programmed to come when called, so I don't need to stop doing what I'm doing to grab it by the neck and store it in my back, while on the move.
      You're on a bike ride, the copter takes off, ideally by itself from your backpack, and you can just instruct it verbally what to do, on the go.
      That, I would buy. And this seems to be working toward such a product. The future will be awesome.

    • @philipwpartain
      @philipwpartain 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I would sort of agree and say that the 'review' is harsh, but the reviewer forms his opinion based on a) his expectations compared to others in the price range, b) his expectations based on the claims & promises of the manufacturer, c) the fact that (as of this moment) nearly 150k people are watching to find out if it's worth spending $550USD to get on. Regarding the idea of it being a "great prototype..." I think it certainly is what we (the consumer) ended up with, the problem is that it was NOT marketed, PRICED, or sold as a 'prototype'. It seems that the ONLY thing it delivers on is it's ability to 'Hover'. I admit that I said 'ouch' a few times during the review...but that's why I watch these. I want to know the good, bad, & ugly before I buy, or as in this case, DON'T buy. ;-)

    • @BisMaxx
      @BisMaxx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      unfortunately you would have to get distracted while on your bike ride by YELLING at the top of your lungs so it can hear your commands.
      The speech feature is a bit out there. Unless of course you develop a watch with a microphone like "KITT" (80's Knight Rider series).
      And nobody seems to realize the struggle that it is to provide a drone with a battery source that is plentiful but also lightweight...
      This sort of tech still has a LONG way to go....

    • @darkkforest
      @darkkforest 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      you're in the future... the post-future

  • @barukbok7
    @barukbok7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thank you, I just ordered it few days ago, and I'm cancelling it now

    • @tofikkhan3001
      @tofikkhan3001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aka that is 🦧🐒🐄🐗🇦🇩🇦🇱🇦🇴🇧🇪🇦🇩🇦🇹

  • @coulsonbeach6390
    @coulsonbeach6390 7 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    looks like someone taped a camera to four pc fans and whacked a battery pack on it,
    i want one :)

    • @AeroicaGaming
      @AeroicaGaming 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Michael Baker LOL..I laughed when I read that. They do look like 4 x 120mm PC cooling fans 😂

    • @TUnit959
      @TUnit959 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wonder how well that would work actually

    • @AeroicaGaming
      @AeroicaGaming 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LOL...if the PSU could take it (which it should) it would be an amazing but expensive and noisy cooling solution.

    • @TUnit959
      @TUnit959 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I meant as a quadcopter. I looked it up and sadly they can't produce enough lift to actually get itself off the ground.

    • @AeroicaGaming
      @AeroicaGaming 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** oooo..gotcha. Nice idea

  • @BrettW
    @BrettW 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    What's up with the audio on this one? The noise cancellation seems off as it's noisy as fuck when he's talking but disappears when he stops?

    • @BrettW
      @BrettW 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fixed after the demo. Okay

    • @JurassicCollectables
      @JurassicCollectables 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      hmm yes. Audio issues seem to be frequent, may be they are testing new mics? Joey's a pro so I trust his judgement

    • @JurassicCollectables
      @JurassicCollectables 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      to me it seems maybe it was recorded too quiet so it overcompensated?

    • @Alex-mp4kl
      @Alex-mp4kl 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      "...on this one." lol oh you. I remember my first tested video.

    • @acexprt
      @acexprt 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brett your Just not used to the pro audio some professional TH-camrs have.

  • @readysetdrone
    @readysetdrone 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'll wait for V2 of this quad. Thanks for a good review!

    • @KiLLJOY1056
      @KiLLJOY1056 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The V2 is actually really cool. It has 4k and a gimble, only problem is its too expensive i could get something so much better for the same price

  • @ucheucheuche
    @ucheucheuche 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really liked this review, thorough and genuine.

  • @giraffebecky
    @giraffebecky 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This guy is really good at this (reviewing products)! I'm impressed!

  • @MichaelAcosta
    @MichaelAcosta 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for the excellent review!

  • @AndreaDRosa
    @AndreaDRosa 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you you just made me save 500$. Was abut to buy it for my travels as a time and space saving drone , but if the image quality isn't there there is no point

  • @erwinmalimban2197
    @erwinmalimban2197 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review! No bullshit intro. Just straight to the point.

  • @BrandonKoops
    @BrandonKoops 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the Color grading/fade effect!

  • @brubrushanghai
    @brubrushanghai 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for your review

  • @firstnamelastname4752
    @firstnamelastname4752 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Good lord, if you can't do sound right then stop trying. Hire a sound guy. Or learn how to do it properly.

    • @Excludos
      @Excludos 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      What's wrong with the sound?

    • @niqhtt
      @niqhtt 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      static'y hissing in the background? I hear it, but don't use headphones so it isn't horrid.

    • @G33kyAli
      @G33kyAli 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's static every time he talks! It's so ANNOYING!

    • @bertramchristensen4172
      @bertramchristensen4172 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      i had problems with the sound too
      only on headphones though

    • @MrJest2
      @MrJest2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Interesting; I just watched it and there were zero problems with sound. I suspect this is a TH-cam issue - I think they are encoding and propagating the video a bit too quickly (probably because of complaints by content creators), and so depending on what server you wind up streaming from the quality of sound may suck for a while. I'd suggest give it an hour or so and check it out again when all the processing world-wide is completed.

  • @khyrianstorms
    @khyrianstorms 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the colour gradin of this video. And it's well edited

  • @stanjones2126
    @stanjones2126 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful. Thanks.

  • @martinbishop1463
    @martinbishop1463 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review can you tell me as someone that just wants a selfi drone if their is a good one coming out?

  • @tomstestkitchen
    @tomstestkitchen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is why I love your channel. This is an honest review, short comings and all, of a product I've been interested in. Have you looked at the Yuneec Breeze yet? It's in the same price range and seems to overcome a lot of the issues you mention here.

  • @bossev
    @bossev 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    great honest review. thanks!

  • @Bobby-lv2kr
    @Bobby-lv2kr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Design is amazing and just out of the box, You don't have to worry about propellers at all and on top of that the foldable approach is awesome I hope in next version they improve video quality and add more sensors to it

    • @jonbal20
      @jonbal20 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya salió la nueva versión y es impresionante el Hover X1

  • @entheogenetic
    @entheogenetic 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wicked COOL! Thanks!

  • @MrDwaynecasey
    @MrDwaynecasey 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the review! Considering the newer one. But there are definitely good points to consider here....

  • @Nathen
    @Nathen 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    MAN your video quality is butterrrrrrrrrr

  • @LONEWOLFAirsoft
    @LONEWOLFAirsoft 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a very good and honest review. Thanks souch for the information.

  • @vsmash2
    @vsmash2 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    good analysis, great presentation.

  • @accordingtohonda4308
    @accordingtohonda4308 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This has potential to be freaking amazing, give it some time to flesh out

  • @vjaytvcanada
    @vjaytvcanada 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing ... great review

  • @c.s.prometheus
    @c.s.prometheus 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful drone

  • @citizenx6337
    @citizenx6337 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow i was just about to buy it, thanks!

  • @beliasphyre3497
    @beliasphyre3497 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's a well done review.

  • @adamsunday2010
    @adamsunday2010 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Review - Well presented and detailed.

  • @KSchawacker
    @KSchawacker 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    They really were onto something with this! Perhaps some more robust version of this will surface soon.

  • @andyb7337
    @andyb7337 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dope, drones are making progress!

  • @Cutlerylover4life1
    @Cutlerylover4life1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    It blows my mind that a youtube channel with this high of production value can't get their audio right!

  • @SuperKax3
    @SuperKax3 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review.

  • @Palazzinappa
    @Palazzinappa 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very useful review!

  • @youngboy4129
    @youngboy4129 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    8-10 mins flight time and it costs $599? NO THANKS

    • @ArianasMoments
      @ArianasMoments 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Eddie Young righhtttttttttt

    • @touchsky6671
      @touchsky6671 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreeeeeee

    • @wysiwyg2006
      @wysiwyg2006 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      exactly. 10 mins is ridiculous and looks like it takes ages to connect and boot up

    • @jacksavage7347
      @jacksavage7347 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      i knoooow if it were 100- 150 then maybe

    • @ghosttjr2
      @ghosttjr2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      and tons of yello too ; P

  • @SpaceZombie
    @SpaceZombie 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome design!

  • @LeeLucas
    @LeeLucas 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great honest review and having looked at a few reviews of this Hover Camera my biggest Gripe with it at first was the noise levels. For example I was looking at this as being a super way to record myself performing a song with my guitar. But it's just impossible to do such a thing with the noise of the damn thing. The 4K was never going to be an issue with me regarding the actual video quality, but seeing here how it's even worse downscaling to 1080p really is bad.

  • @TheMixmastamike1000
    @TheMixmastamike1000 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome review!! And what a cool drone

  • @BizzyKit86
    @BizzyKit86 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm so glad I watched this review. I was literally about to part with £500....

  • @1st1anarkissed
    @1st1anarkissed 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    so would one need to record audio separately and pair in post production if using this as an aerial tripod for vlogging? I really like this thing!

  • @MrHauerManuel
    @MrHauerManuel 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing audio

  • @josenelsonyee9058
    @josenelsonyee9058 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    it's really cool. I want it soon.

  • @bigglyguy8429
    @bigglyguy8429 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's rather amusing to watch this, while enjoying my modern Hover X1, which is pretty much identical, yet much smaller and lighter. I can fit mine in my pocket easily, while this is pretty hefty looking :) Edit: also the 4k camera shown here is nothing like as good as the 2.7k cam on the newer one, while has better stabilization too. I love the way the company has stuck to the concept, just improving it rather than changing the design, as it really is a great design. This vid also makes me appreciate the 12 second or so start-up time of the new one! I've used mine on a really windy beach and while the drone itself was wobbly the actual footage was fine.

  • @michaeljeacock
    @michaeljeacock 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    as a mk1 it seems quite cool can't wait for later gens.

  • @jdquad
    @jdquad 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent review as always, I would love to review this for my channel!

  • @heydrones9012
    @heydrones9012 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Using a drone for selfie is a suitable request, but make a drone for selfie is not a good way.
    I also got a hover camera for test, the quality of EIS is still bad for video and the lightweight and short flight time make the drone get worse at out door. Due to the optical flow sensor for hovering, it was easily shake and drift around and hard to take photo.
    I don't think it worth $599, as I know that it is $150 cheaper, the concept of the product may be wrong at the beginning.

  • @TiagoTiagoT
    @TiagoTiagoT 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    That design looks like it would make for an interesting acro/race quad for beginners.

  • @exmoorman
    @exmoorman 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great idea to be improved upon

  • @AlGreenLightThroughGlass
    @AlGreenLightThroughGlass 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Early days, evolution will see these get much better

  • @GabrielC96
    @GabrielC96 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review pointing out the bad while also commending the genius design, hopefully they can make a 2nd gen and improve.

  • @wi11y1960
    @wi11y1960 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review. Thankyou for this video. Saved me the headache of buying something that would not fulfill the needs.

  • @aaronsz6749
    @aaronsz6749 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it's a nice start, with time they're going to improve it.

  • @ParadoxdesignsOrg
    @ParadoxdesignsOrg 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great design and concept, it really needs its own controller, even if its optional though.

  • @Mrdopestar173
    @Mrdopestar173 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hiii there! What camera, lens and FPS are you recording on? i love the quality.

  • @perniciousvideo
    @perniciousvideo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had such high hopes for the Hover camera...I guess I'll cross fingers and hope they update/upgrade and come out with a better version.

  • @skylitknight5775
    @skylitknight5775 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very cool, are there alternatives? What I mean is what is this machines competition? And does it have a tech genre archetype, like would this be called an auto drone tracking camera?

  • @jake2663
    @jake2663 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So is there any like that with good cameras long lasting battery life body tracking reasonable price and able to withstand some wind?

  • @jonaslolucasify
    @jonaslolucasify 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanx for doing this video! i was considering it but now, not for $599.

  • @ediitzz9741
    @ediitzz9741 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got one a cupple years back and it took a mind of its own and flew off what’s the best way to find it ?

  • @stephendevore9362
    @stephendevore9362 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good review. I wasn't sure what qualities of the camera would be? And the true abilities of the face tracking really were? Thanks 😎

  • @seanpshamrock
    @seanpshamrock 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    simple use with great approach just a platform to grow from.

  • @musikSkool
    @musikSkool 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So cool, it reminds me of a portable HardDrive from 2005.

  • @youser23
    @youser23 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    are you sure it has no IMU ? how should it measure angular rates and accellerations without

  • @aidanmco
    @aidanmco 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I thought this would be fun for $100 or so, and then I looked it up... It's $550 dollars! That is more than I paid for my phantom, a HD drone with a gimbal, gps, and half-mile range. The only thing that is good is the portability.

    • @Pascotam
      @Pascotam 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Over $500 is actually a bit crazy. I think it should be sold at roughly $200 at most.

  • @Mirzadon007
    @Mirzadon007 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you got 1 sub for quality ! looking for more

  • @aaron4820
    @aaron4820 7 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Seeing this test I was expecting this to be some $150 toy, but at $549, I feel sorry for this project especially with the announcement of the Mavik, this is pretty much going to be a dead on arrival launch.. :(

    • @aaron4820
      @aaron4820 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I've since owned the Mavic and tried this passport out from a relative who owns it, and would like to update on the comment above:
      The two aren't comparable, weirdly while the Mavic is far more capable, it just isn't something for an amateur to pick up and use to take some selfies, the passport is something you can genuinely throw into a backpack, throw into the air and it stays hovering with absolutely no worry it would damage anything or anyone, the Mavic however, despite being way smaller and portable than the phantom(s), is still a very serious machine. If you're into drones already, the Mavic is a no brainer being "only" a few hundred bucks more expensive than the passport, but if you aren't, the user friendliness of the passport makes it far more suitable for your average consumer than the DJI offer.
      Still, for what it offers, anything more than $300 imo is too much, but comparing it to the Mavic is not right as there are things this passport offers which Mavic cannot. (namely safety and usability for complete amateurs)

    • @crenshawyeo
      @crenshawyeo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      a balanced comment here on youtube!? 2017 is going well

    • @saiyan_princestudios9790
      @saiyan_princestudios9790 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Update for 2019, you can find them on eBay for $100 heck yeah!

  • @javierishida
    @javierishida 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi you can use this drone to high altitude videos ? like panoramic of landscape??

  • @gargamel55
    @gargamel55 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it mostly used for indoor flying?

  • @screwloose455
    @screwloose455 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the 1991 video quality. Great touch.

  • @mkschreder
    @mkschreder 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sounds like you made a mistake saying it does not have imu. It probably has a full flight controller and optical flow at the bottom. Probably baro too otherwise it would not hover higher up.

  • @KL00100
    @KL00100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'll wait for the next gen.

  • @pieterrossouw8596
    @pieterrossouw8596 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Except for size, how does this compare to a Parrot AR Drone 2. That's just 720p but it might be more stable in wind? It's also way bigger...

  • @TheAce198687
    @TheAce198687 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love the device

  • @nielsjoubert7825
    @nielsjoubert7825 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Norm! One comment: you said this quad does not have an IMU (around 4:30). I believe that's incorrect! It's still using an IMU to keep it level!

  • @ethangullion4950
    @ethangullion4950 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've stated looking at this drone and I was wondering if the app for this drone is on the google play store for androids or if it is just on the app store for iphones. If anyone knows the answer to my question please tell me and thank you.

  • @charlesbenoitthomad
    @charlesbenoitthomad 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I had the coin. Really cool.

  • @SuperFactsCS
    @SuperFactsCS 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    a bit of software improvement and this could be a must buy for cell phone bloggers

  • @MohdFaisal-nh9yg
    @MohdFaisal-nh9yg 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    So sweet

  • @ClutchFirst
    @ClutchFirst 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That quadcopter would have been cool if it was launched a year ago. Maybe they should market it as an indoor toy.

  • @HowardPrice
    @HowardPrice 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So I almost impulse purchased one of these at the Apple store today. You’re review has given me pause but I’m wondering
    If your reviewing this with the target market in mind. I was never looking for a video production drone, just one to grab casual aerial shots on the beach, etc. I understand that you work in a production environ and are used to equipment for that purpose but if you were to put that aside, would you’re eval of this unit change?

  • @T-800..
    @T-800.. 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Norms uneven hoody string is making my OCD go overload!!

  • @DanielA-yg3un
    @DanielA-yg3un 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's so well designed. It looks like a laptop charger with some pc fans attached to the side, so compact. It's unfortunate the technology is not there yet, at least at a reasonable price.

  • @aldrickbanks3455
    @aldrickbanks3455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On taobao,the discount price now is now $ 280 USD or so.What do you guys think of the price?

  • @uavpilot6715
    @uavpilot6715 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This quadcopter looks more like a prototype to me! I like what they've done to it, but it certainly needs improvement.

  • @R3_Live
    @R3_Live 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    There should be a small tracker unit that you just keep on your person with a mode the drone uses to simply stay in proximity of it without any recognition software.

  • @martink9529
    @martink9529 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    so it is controlled through wifi does that mean you can also just set up a hotspot on your mobile

  • @LatiNoble
    @LatiNoble 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let me just say that I LOVE Tested and Mythbusters and I have no respect
    lost for either. That said, both Unbox Therapy and Casey Neistat gave
    great reviews to the Hover Camera. Casey did say it was the funnest
    drone he ever used and would find a use for it in the future. And the
    footage Lewis showed was really crisp inside a professionally lit
    studio.
    Also the point seemed to be missed completely:
    1. This drone has a total flight time of 16-20 minutes. It's not meant to follow you around all day while you vlog.
    2. It was mentioned that, "it would crash into a tree...". That alone would cause a loss in props on almost any other drone or worse, a loss in the product completely. That's worth more than $550USD alone any day of the week.
    3. The whole point of this drone is to have a portable, quick and safe solution to the problems of a traditional drone. And there, I feel, this drone definitely delivers.
    For more experienced vloggers or photographers, it would be the "quick draw" drone to their professional drone. Comparable to the "quick draw" point and shoot to their DSLR.
    When all is said and done this comment and this episode are not really going to matter considering the numbers. As of now over a quarter million people have seen this review and it's only six days old. BUT... Casey's and Unbox Therapy's videos came out yesterday and already have over 2 million combined views. I predict a long waiting list in the near future.

  • @wibulsinthatheeyakorn6355
    @wibulsinthatheeyakorn6355 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    camera quality is great

  • @bandalabajadora
    @bandalabajadora 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know were i can get a charger for this drone. I cant find one online.

  • @mrfriendlyguy
    @mrfriendlyguy 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    So its only good for selfies at short distances? Well I am a newbie when it comes to drones, so that's kind of what I am looking for at the moment, nothing fancy yet.

  • @friggetyfuck
    @friggetyfuck 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great tool to make videos I'll never watch again after the first time.

  • @RIBsfit
    @RIBsfit 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your guys' videos, but what's with the webcam quality audio? It sounds like there's a maxed out noise gate just slapped on.

  • @CINEMATTOX
    @CINEMATTOX 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your lav mic seems to be having RF interferance. Cool video though!

  • @sheriftaha4919
    @sheriftaha4919 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice work bro i like the review more than the hover camera

  • @sak2988
    @sak2988 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wait for this drone alongtime to come out
    .....
    rr really

  • @r4fken
    @r4fken 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will there be a Google 'Daydream' Review/preview video thing at some point?