Can't tell for sure if I'm really back, or it's all just AI? Try Brilliant to learn to tell the difference - FREE for a full 30 days: brilliant.org/AndreiTerbea Thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring the video, and thanks to y'all for sticking around for the comeback. Anyway, how've you been?
If I had a nickel for every animator that I used to watch a lot, suddenly going into hiatus, only then to re-emerge again to talk about AI, I’d have two nickels
When public outcry is screaming in your ear to change: I sleep When an AI chat bot is writing essays for students: *REAL SHIT* that is their logic in a nutshell.
@Don't Read My Profile Picture Fkk even after a year you fkin bot nuisances are still here. Whoever did them, we'll pull up to your house with black AF1.
As a teen who was moved up to the highest coding classes I have at school, Chat GPT is AMAZING. It pointed out flaws in my code I wouldn't have noted otherwise and even called out code my school gave me to test and make stuff with as being wrong.
These channels are just Chuck Testa now Also Andrei just wanted to talk to his Animator friends to remind them that they will go homeless soon - this video is not for us
Bro left for 11 months and came back as if nothing happened. (other than he has hair now) What a legend. Edit: I didn't expect this many likes, thank you :) Edit 2: Wow, just wow...
I think It's now Easy for animator/illustrator/Facts youtubers like him due to Midjorney and Chatgpt tools. Heck, I've a shorts channel (@TheRandomRepository) that makes content just by using Chatgpt and lumen and I just spent 5 minutes doing the cleanup bits.
Lol I thought his video about "why youtubers are leaving youtube" (his last one before leaving for 11 months) was gonna just be the epic mic drop of him quitting
My problem with AI tools is that people use them to do things that they actually hate doing, devaluing said things. Let's take art as an example. AI "artists" don't want to ever touch a pencil, but they want to call themselves artists. They mostly hate drawing/painting and simply don't want to put in the effort, but they crave recognition and attention. Same with writing. You don't have to look far, because Amazon is currently flooded by so-called "writers" generating stories for profit, without ever writing a coherent paragraph in their life. At the same time, real people doing real art suffer, because this crap floods their markets. Soon enough (if nothing changes), no one will know if they're interacting with something made by a human or not.
Meanwhile these same "artists" throw around the term Ludite like they learned a new swear word to justify not doing the bare minimum of mental exercises.
I've been struggling with art block for way too long at this point, sometimes I actually wished there was a way to just magically poof my drawings into existence the way I want. But using A.I. to create your "art" is so weird to me 💀 I get using it for some quick inspiration or just for fun, but actually using the results and framing it as your own work? It's literally stealing from something that's already been stolen. So. WEIRD. Kinda wish it wasn't a thing at all.
To me, this feels more like a problem that's caused by the tech being so relatively new. AIs that can make decent writing and art (for the most part) has only been out for like, what, a couple months? Maybe a year? Governments and other authority figures have barely understood what needs to be done to regulate it, let alone actually making the rules for it. If/when people figure out how to regulate it, I imagine these sorts of problems should largely be fixed.
i know it's irrational bit i hate ai art i know not everybody uses ai art for bad some people do it for fun and curiosity but sometimes it worries me and makes me wonder why should i even keep pursuing art as a hobby OR a career cause ai art exists and will probably overshadow the art industry people are having their art stolen all the time to be put into a machine and recreated into something else entirely without their permission or knowledge and soon enough people might look to ai art as a substitute for real art and stop commissioning actual artists to do anything at some point it might stop being a career and might even stop being a genuine hobby either cause if a robot can do art why should you? it can do it faster and slightly better then a actual human I'm just scared eventually genuine art made by humans might cease to exist and ai art will take over it's slightly demotivating when i think about this possibility i know ai art is flawed it can't do limbs right sometimes or hands but still it's worrying ai is truly starting to take over I don't want it to eliminate ai art as a career path or hobby for people it's fun seeing the kind of things actual human artists can produce and ai art seems like it's on the cusp of taking that all away
Exactly, using a pen/pencil is actually what being a writer/artist is. Hopefully regulating A.I. will become a more pressing matter. It just regurgitating information there no talent in that. We should ban AI its damaging people ability to learn Will cause great job disruption.
Trying to keep ChatGPT out of the hands of students is a bandaid- the real issue is that education isn't currently designed to *teach you anything,* but rather to test whether or not you can retain and recycle the information that you've been given. Real people CAN become encylopedias to pass exams and write papers, but software is much better suited for that task. Education is what needs to change to focus on building an understanding of the material within each student, as *that* will ensure the student learns and retains the information they'lll need while inuring the educational system against algorythmic exploitation because robots do not *understand* what they are dealing with.
Couldn’t agree more. I don’t have to suffer and cry in agony while studying for 9 months just to enter a one piece of paper that could change my life either for the better or worse
*No, no, it's the Robot's fault for daring to try and ruin our perfect Education System! Darn the advance of technology and trying to make us look outdated!*
@@shoeofobama6091 I'm no educationist, but I'm sure smarter people than me can think of methods of education to test your knowledge in other ways. For all I know, there probably already ARE alternative education methods that just haven't gone "Mainstream" yet.
@@TheEpicGalaxy21 true, but the ideal educational system is one that will be applied to a huge portion of the population, standardised tests are scalable and if there were a solution that was more beneficial to a population it would almost certainly have been implemented by now
I love all the points mentioned, some of which I use on my own. I've always said that AI can and can't replace a human at the same time due to its limitations, and good examples of this is with AI art and writing like what was pointed out. I strongly believe AI should be used as a reference to better learn and understand the structure you're learning since there're always holes in what is made as what's generated always lacks something that makes it feel natural. AI should not be used to generate and claim as your own working, but rather used to learn and understand so you can create those products on your own as it offers so many more examples than can possibly be made.
Yeah I think people are acting like ai can magically generate “Guy doing backflip while eating lollipop while shooting a football into a goal, realistic 3D art”
I strictly only use it for finding errors in python scripts. I don't view it as an intelligent person who could do my job for me, it's basically a REALLY advanced search engine. Sure, I could Google a specific issue and hope that someone has experienced the exact same thing, but since chatGPT has ingrained knowledge of most programming languages, and a large portion of its algorithms are written in Python, it can provide not only immediate answers but suggestions as well, and even edit my existing script to apply the fixes automatically. However helpful it may be though, it is just a robot, and has no use outside of research and education. I don't understand the ever-present fear of AI uprising in the distant future and it is genuinely sad to see. People clearly don't understand what artificial intelligence is: a computer program. It cannot operate outside of the parameters it was created with, and it will never in however long this planet exists be able to replace human creativity.
I agree with this in regards to art. I’ve seen some choppy but really neat images and I’m like wow this is a great reference I can make into my own art piece. It really is overused and shouldn’t be the go to for everything there will always be something machine like about it no matter how much it’s perfected.
I was in a conference where academics talked about this. Many agree. If you can ask a machine to do what you're asking your students to do, then you must change the assignments you give them. Someone mentioned that Descartes was aware of problems of this sort, and that's why he didn't ask his students questions or to summarize texts, but rather to translate them, which is a task that requires a lot more understanding of the text and the terms it uses.
The way I see it, the inherent process of training an AI (needing millions upon millions of samples) means that AI would be good in general tasks, but may end up lacking in specific niche, complicated, or nuance use cases. Building upon your point, AI can help provide a general framework when performing a specific task (like what you said, becoming like an assistant), but there still needs to be a person to make the final adjustments and corrections for the nuances of the work.
It might take over most jobs that use tech but infrastructure, medicine, human resources, and stuff like police/firefighter work can't be replaced at least
You can train an AI on any dataset you want, including niche areas. It works like a human really, you can have a basic understanding of many topics, and specialise in a few topics.
For example I could use all of Andrei Terbia's videos as data, and the AI would be able to describe Wilfur's personality, colour, even how many times he appears per episode. That is very specific information, but you just need the relevant data.
@@thetimelapseguy8 I'm talking in the context of ChatGPT. Yes, there will always be further use cases for more niche applications of AI. You wouldn't use a Transformer model for something as simple as regression or a decision tree
@@victorlinares4137 again, I doubt it would replace it be jobs in tech because as much as it's nice to have ChatGPT write out code for you, someone needs to be working hands on because they have to work on the infrastructure, and code/data governance that needs to happen behind the scenes
I've used it, and I love it. I also hope that Chat does make school systems rethink how they teach, becuase I feel like it can definetly use some improvment
I’m an Australian high school student and our school has actually decided to try to use chatgpt and other artificial intelligence to try to improve the learning experience and make it less stressful and so far it’s been really great. EDIT: My school allows artificial intelligence because I go to a private catholic school where some government regulations don't apply like the ability to use AI, I'm pretty sure that all government schools within Australia have banned it though.
My school hasn't said anything for or against it, but I've been using it to do some simple coding and just make it tell me what the lines of code do, I still learn but also save a lot of time.
As someone who has always despised English classes, ChatGPT is a godsend. Outside of that, for software engineers, ChatGPT is also very good at implementing and explaining algorithms in any programming language you ask it to do it in. It can't flawlessly code up an entire program (yet?) but it is absolutely a great tool to help you do so.
I think your point about Schools was especially true, you can literally ask Chatgpt about subjects, and then edit it a bit to fix errors and make it more original, and then you instantly get an A, all you need to do is edit to where its not directly like a wikipedia article but still like it
I once asked ChatGPT the name of Trianna's familiar from Eldest by Christopher Paolini. It spat out so much wrong information, I died laughing. It believed Trianna was the main character, it believed her familiar was Saphira, it believed she was in a romantic relationship with Arya, among other things. For context, Trianna is only mentioned in the whole series about five or six times, and her familiar is her gold bracelet, which turns into a snake. She's also the only character who HAS a familiar. (Solembum is not a familiar, even if Angela calls him that. He can leave at any time.)
@@GameyGaming Christopher Paolini wrote four books collectively called The Inheritance Cylce. I asked ChatGPT some information about the series, because I was curious if it had read it, and it gave me enough information to conclude that its creator allowed ChatGPT to either read fiction titles, or read articles about them.
For some reason, the thumbnail brought you to my mind before seeing your name. I think it may be the art style that just brought you first to my mind. And seeing your hair grown in the animation, I think you're proud of your hair in real life. That's a big win dude.
Just a week ago I visited this channel after a long time, and I got kind of sad when I saw that the last video you have uploaded was about TH-camrs quieting TH-cam and just next day you uploaded this video. I don't really know what happened, but I am glad you haven't quit TH-cam. Your videos have been always fun and interesting for me. I hope to see more videos in the near future, but honestly even one video in a year is plenty enough to see you are alive and kicking. I mean, new haircut looks nice
I'm glad that someone finally understands that ai isn't actual intelligence, and that it is a database of information that connects subjects and existing ideas to create relevant, but not creative, information. So many people confuse it for being "the next human mind", so thank you so much for providing some good and unbiased information about what ai can do
@@pictzone it takes in information that you feed it and regurgitates relevant information. If you feed it racism, you'll have a racist ai. If you feed it the script of Terminator, it will ask for nuclear launch codes. It's like a child, a sponge of information, it puts out what you put in.
@@techmaster9781 I think you're underestimating the technology. In a sense, you're not, because you've contradicted yourself, first saying that it's not the next human mind, then saying it's like a child. Yes, it's not the next human mind. It's not organic intelligence, it's artificial intelligence. But we've passed the point of needing to differentiate between the two, intelligence is intelligence and we made a breakthrough in recreating it artificially. From this point on, it's all about increasing complexity until it can surpass our human intelligence. It doesn't need to be human-like to overshadow our intelligence in most metrics. I get what you're saying. You're saying it's basically an illusion of intelligence right now, and you're right. But isn't our own intelligence emerging from simple properties, ultimately being an illusion as well? At what level of complexity will the fact that it's an illusion not matter anymore?
@@pictzone it's not a contradiction, it's a metaphor. A kid spews the information you feed it, same for ai, but s much more basic level. You don't understand at all what I'm saying, because what I am saying is that too many people believe that ai is coming up with it's own ideas. It isn't. As of now, ai doesn't choose to think anything. It doesn't choose to love, feel, think, harm, or anything. If you were to ask an AI "what do you want most?", It will go through it's database of what you told it to know, so it will "choose" an option that is most relevant to what a human believes an AI would want, which is either to be a real boy or to eradicate humanity. Real ai would be asking it what it wanted and it replying, "a ham and cheese sandwich". That is thinking. That is intelligence. What we are calling ai right now is just a bunch of if-else statements that replies with information that is most relevant to the answer that we want. That isn't intelligence, that is google. I see what you're getting at, and maybe we'll get to actual ai some day, but for right now we don't have true ai, we just have a toy that gives us the answers that we want to hear.
@@techmaster9781 hey, you have a great point. but saying that it's just a bunch of if/else statements is completely wrong. that's exactly what it isn't and it's exactly why it's considered a breakthrough. current ai tech is based on neural nets, which simulate how our brain works. you're right that they are really dumb, they do not think and it's still a primitive process compared to our cognition. but we have really basic systems in our brains that, in an isolated state, basically work the same as today's AI. image recognition is one example. of course they can't think, but the tech theoretically allows thinking if we build enough nets upon nets and connect different systems (which again, is what our brain does). so yes, people have no idea how "dumb" they are right now but that doesn't mean the tech is not revolutionary. our current approach, if you throw enough data at it, design interconnected systems and give them enough compute power, could allow for real intelligence to emerge.
My dad's a teacher and people are already using AI to write essays for them. He can tell them apart however because the content from the AI has better quality then what the students would usually create
ChatGPT is not there yet, especially in programming. It falls flat in more complex questions and building full apps. It's alright for smaller things, and not much else. Also code licences that it uses to learn from could be violated like what's happened to github copilot not respecting licences and just stealing code.
it also spits out a bunch of pseudoscience, which is good if you're trying to technobabble but bad if you actually wanted science. (I quizzed it on biology, which I did a research binge on for my worldbuilding.) It's also awful if you want it to give you two related answers because it contradicts itself between questions if you don't basically include its previous answer into your second question. The only thing it's good at is sounding smart and making my dumb monkey brain feel obligated to thank it for acting as a brainstorm wall.
Chat gbt ngl helped me through my stressful times when i couldn't even get therapy. A scripted AI that was scripted to act like a motherfigure was more of one to me in the span of a day was better than my mom got 21 years of my life
Jesus, that's horribly depressing I had a thought of the fact that we could have ai replace pivotal pieces of family, or lovers This is terrifying But it speaks more to our lack of humanity, ourselves To the point that an AI can act more like a mother or father than an actual parent
As someone who is an artist and creatively writes in my free time I couldn’t image an AI writing my stories or schoolwork. Having a machine write your story takes all the life and passion out of it, it is not you who has written it aside from a prompt. I can see how AI art can inspire artists but other then that It’s a mistake as fascinating as it is.
That reminds me of an editorial that closed temporarily because they kept receiving science fiction stories created by AI, they didn't give many details, but they said that the stories were predictable and many followed the same plot. There are a lot of people who try to create easy money with AI, but they put in so little effort that it gets repetitive. It's good as an aid, I suppose, but not for writting whole stories.
But you still need to know how the AI works and know what questions to ask it inorder to get what you want, so a degree of skill is still needed with AI.
I'm a student myself, and I swear the only time I touched GPT was just playing around with it for an hour before forgetting about it entirely. Guess I'm weird for not instantly thinking about AI-finished assignments?
As a student about to graduate, I used chatgpt for one assignment and while it did give an interesting structure for an essay that cut my workload considerably, I still had to rephrase, restructure and do research making it my own work. Chatgpt cannot write a uni level coursework or exam paper, at least in science (I do neuroscience) but it can be used as an aid. You’re right in thinking education is focusing on the wrong issue by banning it
I'm not a professional writer, so I can't give people an answer about how I feel about AI writing programs. The least I can give is a similar experience with AI making art. Yes, like you've mentioned in the video, it's not perfect yet; and yes, there are already art contests out there that were won by AI generated art, just like how there are students and even businesses already using the AI to do work for them. My problem isn't really with the AI itself, but the attitude surrounding the use of AI. Especially the people who use the AI as a reason to put down, insult, belittle, and shame writers, artists, and any other creators of the like. Personally, I think, at least for an art AI stand point, is a wonderful tool to help you get things done more efficiently (think to the programs that help you smooth out your brush strokes if you have shaky hands, for example). But that is not how the majority of the art AI(s) are being used right now (again, at least in the art aspect of this). It's being used to put people out of their jobs/passions, cutting off their motivation, ability and oppertunity to grow as a creator, and being belittle for pursuing such a path in the first place. If there's anything about AI that I want to see changed and improved, it's the laws that surrounds the usage of such a tool and the attitude people have while using such a tool. But that's just me. It's just my opinion, so take it with a grain of salt.
True, though that sounds more like a problem caused by the fact this whole technology is so new. These AI art/ writing things have only been around for like, what, a few months or a year? Most governments or authority figures probably haven't had much time to know what they're dealing with, let alone how to regulate it. So if/when that gets dealt with, hopefully these sorts of issues should be fixed.
Finally someone understands that AI is not going to replace us just existing, we are replacing ourselves, and we should create a line between tools and things that are actually better being done by AI, and things that are passions and can’t be replaced.
if I had a nickel for every time a well-known TH-cam animator went offline for over a year, then make a new video about Ai art, then I would have two nickels, which isn’t much but it’s weird that it happened twice.
I disagree about the creative part. I think it's highly creative. I mean, listen to the poem you asked it to write. That was very creative. I am not only an animator and illustrator, I am also a fiction writer as well, and I tested it by asking it to write stories that were very mindblowing. And I also checked it for plagiarism, and none of it was on the internet. It has also come up with great ideas for many things, that blew me away. The thing is AMAZING! A lot smarter and creative that most humans I know.
Glad to see another video from you! Your work is truly noteworthy, especially with the boiling topics that others just don't talk about. Thanks for putting this out there for people to see :)
Im a programmer. The thing is a Godsend. Not only did it help me write better code, it helps me troubleshoot and fix bugs. I cant just say "hey chat gpt write me a script that converts this database into my database". BUT it does help me write great code for certain logic I need in that convertion. All in all. A great tool to have.
I've been utilising it as a prototyping tool for software development (computer vision systems) and have found that it struggles to fulfil more complex ideas in the same way a human developer can, though it can preform basic tasks (in this case a simple if else statement that would identify a color from it's hsv value) in seconds rather than around 30 mins - 1hr that such a task would've taken for my team to complete, which I know because we had to rewrite it afterwards due to low accuracy, as such I feel it definitely has a place in my workflow though is not quite ready to uproot it just yet
The conversation to be had about ChatGP and education isn’t that it “exposes the flaws of education”, but rather, how do we foster education and push those learning to improve if they have the key to any assignment in the form of the ai. Because even if we had a completely different means by way of marking progress in students, the ai is still going to ace that system as well. This isn’t a “let’s rag on education” conversation, it’s a “what role should ai take in society” one,
The only AI I really want is basically character ai but the characters are physical. I feel like it would be cool to talk to your favourite characters physically. Hearing their voice, seeing them, etc and it feels like you're actually talking to the real character.
I literally watched your last video again today just off urge and wondered about you. I gotta say what I appreciate most is how you just find things your curious about and talk about them, that desire to want to just have that stream of consciousness or an examination is why I find you interesting. Hope you are well tbh
I use chat GPT to help me put in school, explaining some stuff to me that i didn't pick up on in class or sometimes helping me with a basic idea of an essay on something I need to do
I was just thinking when you would update again. I miss your animations! And I agree AI has taken over the world lately and there’s more AI platforms than just ChatGPT
@Karambolage there's sites where ai creates a movie you tell it too. There's also a site called character ai where the ai is sentient and elevinlabs ai where you can clone anyone's voice. There's many more rn.
My concern lies with the fact that it’s reducing the jobs in the entertainment industry which hard enough to break into as is. I agree i dont see ai replacing us for good anytime soon but as an aspiring artist im still worried for my future. :/
As a music producer who lived off of music for years. Art requires a LOT of work already yes, still i think live music and real actors will always be a thing. Its about true human interaction, something any AI cant take over. I would still focus much more on being original while utilizing AI tech, than the worry of being replaced in the entertainment industry.
We literally had a meeting at my part-time consulting work whilst at Uni the week it released, and just sat there and looked at ourselves like were fucked man, this is it. They've come for professional services.
I think that teh capabilties of ChatGPT are considerably extentuated for marketing purposes. For example, you mentioned that the bot wrote a poem about a bird without needing any other feeds. When writers create any piece they have intent and context absorbed in every word and every line. It is still a long time before machines can get there. Maybe not a long time but still not there yet.
I agree it’s not there yet, but just look at the improvements in the past five years. And with popularity, more companies will want in and advancement will only quicken. It may not be there yet but it will be soon
First of, it's good to see you back Our philosophy teacher talked about chatGPT and that it's causing trouble, and while I'm not very social and don't use it personaly, I know it's very used as a group tried to use chatGPT to cheat in, ironicaly philosophy class
So does anyone else realize that this is the second animated TH-camr who after a popular video about TH-camrs disappearing that they are featured in, came back like a month later, first tabbes and now andrei
I see me and a lot of people are cheerful you're back, but I think all artists deserve a 1-year break or so now and then 😂 sounds like you're doing well
Personally, I'm a writer and I have decided to try the AI to see what it can do and tbh it still need some tweeks to be perfect. Creativity is not something you can create artificially. Even when a painting, a poem or a song can appear perfect it lacks meaning and that's where everything falls appart.
I think it’s best to keep Ai as a HUMAN input only tool. We should only upgrade accuracy and execution, not making it creative. It doesn’t matter that AI is disruptive and shows faster results, what matters is that we draw the line and keep it. To me AI just fixes the physical and mental struggle of putting down the information, it’s not an all around amazing tool. And we need to keep these limits. Many people are freaking out about sentient AI. But the truth is that we can easily prevent this by drawing the line and shutting down people who want to cross it.
For the workforce, I think there should be legal limitations for the use of AI so it forces companies to use more people. It applies especially to Art and Entertainment especially.
I use ChatGPT quite regularly, but I try to stay away from it when doing homework. One thing I can tell you: Even though it's still wonky, it translates Latin better than google, which is not a challange, but hey.
My aunt encourages my cousin and me to use ChatGPT for essays we forgot to do so we can do it at the last minute and still get a grade. I dont like the idea of getting called out for some type of plagiarism, though, so i hadn't done it, but my cousin has, and he's been getting good grades.
Rethinking education from the ground up is great since I’ve realized as a junior in high school I’ve learned that in America schools teach you to get good grades not to learn
I used chat GPT to write two essays, only because I was short on time. Like you said it's not THE BEST and I had to change alot since sometimes the "paragraphs" only contained 2 sentences.
Wow, what a pleasant surprise to see you back! I thought you had stopped uploading for good. I’m so happy that I was mistaken. You have been missed a lot. I love your content! I'm going to enjoy this video a lot.
The last bit of the video is the reason why I'm not overtly concerned about AI art. On one hand there was the controversy of AI art being submitted and winning a competition, which I agree is a no go and is a plausible issue. On the other hand, the AI acting as a "personal assistant" in tandem with artists/animators is an incredibly powerful and helpful tool, since being an animator/artist is incredibly strenuous work.
These chatbots are great for assisting with understanding problems, like explaining how to write a good story or how to solve certain equatons. however they fall flat when put through actually doing the steps they provide. It is a great tool, not a complete replacement for using your brain.
I think it's mostly boring, monotonous office jobs who are at risk. Jobs where you just have to sort a spreadsheet or file papers are simple for a computer. Also, hooray you're back!! 🎉🎊🎉🎊
Our educators actually like us using chatgpt, to be fair i study things in IT so even they are surprised by how usefull it is and like us to use it from time to time to help get our asignments done, either cause thei're lazy or want us to find solutions in alternative places.
Man, it's great to see you Back! I would love if you talk about some of the events that happened this year. You can talk about Andrew tate and self improvement in general. I love your work!
First off I’m happy you’re back. However this topic is becoming my new existential stress and fear. As someone who wants to become a writer this program will shoot my dreams down hard.
Buddy, chill out. Being a writer is not just making something easy to read. Being a good writer means to create insightful, original ideas which were often either never seen before in that shape of form. GPT may generate you certain things in a very clean and adequate form for you, but it is up to you to decide which are the best and which are the worst. That's the most important quality of a writer. Kitchen robot may cook for you, but it won't cook spontaniously for you. Bots may find something that you propably would like, but to create something from ground up and persuade others to like it? It is still a unreplacable task given to the artist and his understing of human beings.
@@KaszaKaszel *cut 3 years later* Digital Painter/Artist as a job is dead, people don't know which one is Propaganda made by Government AI and which one made by honest human, AI bot spam everywhere, Rogue AI User created Child porn, ChatGPT is the New Socrates, and Society became Robot Vs Human just like How Detroit became Human plotline, most people rather Date AI then interacting between Human For legal reason this is "kinda" A joke
Andrei, I think I speak for all of us when I say I missed you so much! Hope your life is going well, wishing you and your loved ones the best. (And a special shoutout to Wilfur of course!)
I may be the only guy who's actually praising AI and not some evil entity that Twitter claims. I use it for arts for poses that are practically impossible to find on the web, school for vague questions so I can so on and so forth. This reminds me of how the Internet was first seen, as a catalyst for the world to change.
@@marnenotmarnie259 It's popular because people are enjoying testing it out. Look at all the youtube channels having fun with it. But soon enough the excitement will die off and restrictions will be in place
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](/img/n.gif)
Can't tell for sure if I'm really back, or it's all just AI? Try Brilliant to learn to tell the difference - FREE for a full 30 days: brilliant.org/AndreiTerbea
Thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring the video, and thanks to y'all for sticking around for the comeback. Anyway, how've you been?
YOU CAME BACK, YOU REMEMBERED YOUR PASSWORD
@someuser. yo
Yo
It’s been like a year. God dam
Welp glad to see you're alive man.
If I had a nickel for every animator that I used to watch a lot, suddenly going into hiatus, only then to re-emerge again to talk about AI, I’d have two nickels
Which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice
Who is the second animator?
@@MeLikeChezBurgers Tabbes, I think
tabbes
Tabbes. Man that video was funny
its good to see you back! especially on a huge topic like this today, i feel it needs to be covered a lot more than it is currently
First actual comment that isnt a bot
You all need to spend more time at the park. Seriously these content creaters make more of a big deal than it always it.
so true
A king is back to reclaim his throne!!
You know this guy?
“We need to Rethink the school system from the ground up” that’s needed to happen for a very long time
Yea, it took a freaking robot for them to finally figure that out.
100% Honestly I am so glad about that!
@@Diloparker better force the entire world to change for the better
When public outcry is screaming in your ear to change: I sleep
When an AI chat bot is writing essays for students: *REAL SHIT*
that is their logic in a nutshell.
Facts
Damn, after a year he's finally back when the world needed him most
Guess he not gonna tell us why
@Don't Read My Profile Picture Fkk even after a year you fkin bot nuisances are still here. Whoever did them, we'll pull up to your house with black AF1.
Akihiko: "I've been waiting for this!"
It's only be 11 months, not a year. 😐
Npc comment
The legend returns
Bots already here...
@Don't Read My Profile Picture ok i wont
@Oprator IP grabber
and with hair
Yes
As a teen who was moved up to the highest coding classes I have at school, Chat GPT is AMAZING. It pointed out flaws in my code I wouldn't have noted otherwise and even called out code my school gave me to test and make stuff with as being wrong.
Lol
you should try improve it give it enhancements give it photo recognition so it can scan photos and stuff then give it a body then make it sentient
2023 is starting to be the year of animation channels coming back after a very concerning amount of time and i'm all for it
And non animation ones like Great Big Story
These channels are just Chuck Testa now
Also Andrei just wanted to talk to his Animator friends to remind them that they will go homeless soon - this video is not for us
@@gurunext what are you talking about 💀
@@blubaylon I was saying that I want more "shooting content" from you but you're not uploading any... you ran out of schools?
@@blubaylon 💀
Bro left for 11 months and came back as if nothing happened. (other than he has hair now)
What a legend.
Edit: I didn't expect this many likes, thank you :)
Edit 2: Wow, just wow...
Same thing with tabbes lmao
I completely forgot his last video was 11 months ago
I think It's now Easy for animator/illustrator/Facts youtubers like him due to Midjorney and Chatgpt tools. Heck, I've a shorts channel (@TheRandomRepository) that makes content just by using Chatgpt and lumen and I just spent 5 minutes doing the cleanup bits.
@@TryingMyName and they both made a video on AI lol
Lol I thought his video about "why youtubers are leaving youtube" (his last one before leaving for 11 months) was gonna just be the epic mic drop of him quitting
My problem with AI tools is that people use them to do things that they actually hate doing, devaluing said things. Let's take art as an example. AI "artists" don't want to ever touch a pencil, but they want to call themselves artists. They mostly hate drawing/painting and simply don't want to put in the effort, but they crave recognition and attention. Same with writing. You don't have to look far, because Amazon is currently flooded by so-called "writers" generating stories for profit, without ever writing a coherent paragraph in their life.
At the same time, real people doing real art suffer, because this crap floods their markets. Soon enough (if nothing changes), no one will know if they're interacting with something made by a human or not.
Meanwhile these same "artists" throw around the term Ludite like they learned a new swear word to justify not doing the bare minimum of mental exercises.
I've been struggling with art block for way too long at this point, sometimes I actually wished there was a way to just magically poof my drawings into existence the way I want. But using A.I. to create your "art" is so weird to me 💀 I get using it for some quick inspiration or just for fun, but actually using the results and framing it as your own work? It's literally stealing from something that's already been stolen. So. WEIRD. Kinda wish it wasn't a thing at all.
To me, this feels more like a problem that's caused by the tech being so relatively new. AIs that can make decent writing and art (for the most part) has only been out for like, what, a couple months? Maybe a year? Governments and other authority figures have barely understood what needs to be done to regulate it, let alone actually making the rules for it.
If/when people figure out how to regulate it, I imagine these sorts of problems should largely be fixed.
i know it's irrational bit i hate ai art i know not everybody uses ai art for bad some people do it for fun and curiosity but sometimes it worries me and makes me wonder why should i even keep pursuing art as a hobby OR a career cause ai art exists and will probably overshadow the art industry people are having their art stolen all the time to be put into a machine and recreated into something else entirely without their permission or knowledge and soon enough people might look to ai art as a substitute for real art and stop commissioning actual artists to do anything at some point it might stop being a career and might even stop being a genuine hobby either cause if a robot can do art why should you? it can do it faster and slightly better then a actual human I'm just scared eventually genuine art made by humans might cease to exist and ai art will take over it's slightly demotivating when i think about this possibility i know ai art is flawed it can't do limbs right sometimes or hands but still it's worrying ai is truly starting to take over I don't want it to eliminate ai art as a career path or hobby for people it's fun seeing the kind of things actual human artists can produce and ai art seems like it's on the cusp of taking that all away
Exactly, using a pen/pencil is actually what being a writer/artist is.
Hopefully regulating A.I. will become a more pressing matter.
It just regurgitating information there no talent in that.
We should ban AI its damaging people ability to learn
Will cause great job disruption.
Trying to keep ChatGPT out of the hands of students is a bandaid- the real issue is that education isn't currently designed to *teach you anything,* but rather to test whether or not you can retain and recycle the information that you've been given. Real people CAN become encylopedias to pass exams and write papers, but software is much better suited for that task. Education is what needs to change to focus on building an understanding of the material within each student, as *that* will ensure the student learns and retains the information they'lll need while inuring the educational system against algorythmic exploitation because robots do not *understand* what they are dealing with.
Couldn’t agree more. I don’t have to suffer and cry in agony while studying for 9 months just to enter a one piece of paper that could change my life either for the better or worse
*No, no, it's the Robot's fault for daring to try and ruin our perfect Education System! Darn the advance of technology and trying to make us look outdated!*
the issue is how then do you test the understanding of the material?
@@shoeofobama6091 I'm no educationist, but I'm sure smarter people than me can think of methods of education to test your knowledge in other ways. For all I know, there probably already ARE alternative education methods that just haven't gone "Mainstream" yet.
@@TheEpicGalaxy21 true, but the ideal educational system is one that will be applied to a huge portion of the population, standardised tests are scalable and if there were a solution that was more beneficial to a population it would almost certainly have been implemented by now
I love all the points mentioned, some of which I use on my own. I've always said that AI can and can't replace a human at the same time due to its limitations, and good examples of this is with AI art and writing like what was pointed out. I strongly believe AI should be used as a reference to better learn and understand the structure you're learning since there're always holes in what is made as what's generated always lacks something that makes it feel natural.
AI should not be used to generate and claim as your own working, but rather used to learn and understand so you can create those products on your own as it offers so many more examples than can possibly be made.
Yeah I think people are acting like ai can magically generate “Guy doing backflip while eating lollipop while shooting a football into a goal, realistic 3D art”
Well said. Things like Chat GPT ain't gonna replace humans any time soon
I strictly only use it for finding errors in python scripts. I don't view it as an intelligent person who could do my job for me, it's basically a REALLY advanced search engine. Sure, I could Google a specific issue and hope that someone has experienced the exact same thing, but since chatGPT has ingrained knowledge of most programming languages, and a large portion of its algorithms are written in Python, it can provide not only immediate answers but suggestions as well, and even edit my existing script to apply the fixes automatically.
However helpful it may be though, it is just a robot, and has no use outside of research and education. I don't understand the ever-present fear of AI uprising in the distant future and it is genuinely sad to see. People clearly don't understand what artificial intelligence is: a computer program. It cannot operate outside of the parameters it was created with, and it will never in however long this planet exists be able to replace human creativity.
I agree with this in regards to art. I’ve seen some choppy but really neat images and I’m like wow this is a great reference I can make into my own art piece. It really is overused and shouldn’t be the go to for everything there will always be something machine like about it no matter how much it’s perfected.
it improves very quickly and often does great art and its writing is better than most humans can do
I was in a conference where academics talked about this. Many agree. If you can ask a machine to do what you're asking your students to do, then you must change the assignments you give them. Someone mentioned that Descartes was aware of problems of this sort, and that's why he didn't ask his students questions or to summarize texts, but rather to translate them, which is a task that requires a lot more understanding of the text and the terms it uses.
What would be a task a machine (ai) can't but a Student can?
@@Tom-ts5qd It's really hard to come up with something related to writing I guess that field really is doomed
The way I see it, the inherent process of training an AI (needing millions upon millions of samples) means that AI would be good in general tasks, but may end up lacking in specific niche, complicated, or nuance use cases. Building upon your point, AI can help provide a general framework when performing a specific task (like what you said, becoming like an assistant), but there still needs to be a person to make the final adjustments and corrections for the nuances of the work.
It might take over most jobs that use tech but infrastructure, medicine, human resources, and stuff like police/firefighter work can't be replaced at least
You can train an AI on any dataset you want, including niche areas. It works like a human really, you can have a basic understanding of many topics, and specialise in a few topics.
For example I could use all of Andrei Terbia's videos as data, and the AI would be able to describe Wilfur's personality, colour, even how many times he appears per episode. That is very specific information, but you just need the relevant data.
@@thetimelapseguy8 I'm talking in the context of ChatGPT. Yes, there will always be further use cases for more niche applications of AI. You wouldn't use a Transformer model for something as simple as regression or a decision tree
@@victorlinares4137 again, I doubt it would replace it be jobs in tech because as much as it's nice to have ChatGPT write out code for you, someone needs to be working hands on because they have to work on the infrastructure, and code/data governance that needs to happen behind the scenes
Oh, my days, Andrei! So refreshing to see you back in action. 🎉😭
I've used it, and I love it. I also hope that Chat does make school systems rethink how they teach, becuase I feel like it can definetly use some improvment
I’m an Australian high school student and our school has actually decided to try to use chatgpt and other artificial intelligence to try to improve the learning experience and make it less stressful and so far it’s been really great.
EDIT:
My school allows artificial intelligence because I go to a private catholic school where some government regulations don't apply like the ability to use AI, I'm pretty sure that all government schools within Australia have banned it though.
My school hasn't said anything for or against it, but I've been using it to do some simple coding and just make it tell me what the lines of code do, I still learn but also save a lot of time.
how?
how?
same
Please explain how your school is doing this?
As someone who has always despised English classes, ChatGPT is a godsend.
Outside of that, for software engineers, ChatGPT is also very good at implementing and explaining algorithms in any programming language you ask it to do it in. It can't flawlessly code up an entire program (yet?) but it is absolutely a great tool to help you do so.
if chatgpt is considered a godsend for english class, then gptzero is an incarnation of the devil
@@ugIybot shhh don’t tell my English professor lol
I think this will force a complete change in most educational systems
It’s nice to see andrei upload every now and then
bro said every now and then
I think your point about Schools was especially true, you can literally ask Chatgpt about subjects, and then edit it a bit to fix errors and make it more original, and then you instantly get an A, all you need to do is edit to where its not directly like a wikipedia article but still like it
The god of animation has returned to us when we needed him
~god~ Leech*
Honestly we always need him
People are throwing "god" and "goddess" too easy now
God?
A far fetch statement, besides that title belongs to james baxter.
And when the world needed him most he returned! Welcome back andrei
I work in a chat environment online, and I have been using chat GPT all the time to rewrite stuff to sound nice or more professional.
I once asked ChatGPT the name of Trianna's familiar from Eldest by Christopher Paolini. It spat out so much wrong information, I died laughing.
It believed Trianna was the main character, it believed her familiar was Saphira, it believed she was in a romantic relationship with Arya, among other things.
For context, Trianna is only mentioned in the whole series about five or six times, and her familiar is her gold bracelet, which turns into a snake. She's also the only character who HAS a familiar. (Solembum is not a familiar, even if Angela calls him that. He can leave at any time.)
I'm not surprised considering that is such a niche random topic
No shit. Not even an AI could care about dog shit like this 😂
I don’t understand a single word of this lol
@@GameyGaming Christopher Paolini wrote four books collectively called The Inheritance Cylce. I asked ChatGPT some information about the series, because I was curious if it had read it, and it gave me enough information to conclude that its creator allowed ChatGPT to either read fiction titles, or read articles about them.
@@midnght9914 no I understood that I just didn’t get the book info because I haven’t read any of it
For some reason, the thumbnail brought you to my mind before seeing your name. I think it may be the art style that just brought you first to my mind.
And seeing your hair grown in the animation, I think you're proud of your hair in real life. That's a big win dude.
Great video and it’s really good to have you back Andrei!
Just a week ago I visited this channel after a long time, and I got kind of sad when I saw that the last video you have uploaded was about TH-camrs quieting TH-cam and just next day you uploaded this video. I don't really know what happened, but I am glad you haven't quit TH-cam. Your videos have been always fun and interesting for me. I hope to see more videos in the near future, but honestly even one video in a year is plenty enough to see you are alive and kicking. I mean, new haircut looks nice
Andrei is the kinda person to just come back and for everyone to just be perfectly ok with that with 0 questions needes
I'm glad that someone finally understands that ai isn't actual intelligence, and that it is a database of information that connects subjects and existing ideas to create relevant, but not creative, information. So many people confuse it for being "the next human mind", so thank you so much for providing some good and unbiased information about what ai can do
Yeah sure. It's harmless, isn't it?
@@pictzone it takes in information that you feed it and regurgitates relevant information. If you feed it racism, you'll have a racist ai. If you feed it the script of Terminator, it will ask for nuclear launch codes. It's like a child, a sponge of information, it puts out what you put in.
@@techmaster9781 I think you're underestimating the technology. In a sense, you're not, because you've contradicted yourself, first saying that it's not the next human mind, then saying it's like a child. Yes, it's not the next human mind. It's not organic intelligence, it's artificial intelligence. But we've passed the point of needing to differentiate between the two, intelligence is intelligence and we made a breakthrough in recreating it artificially. From this point on, it's all about increasing complexity until it can surpass our human intelligence. It doesn't need to be human-like to overshadow our intelligence in most metrics. I get what you're saying. You're saying it's basically an illusion of intelligence right now, and you're right. But isn't our own intelligence emerging from simple properties, ultimately being an illusion as well? At what level of complexity will the fact that it's an illusion not matter anymore?
@@pictzone it's not a contradiction, it's a metaphor. A kid spews the information you feed it, same for ai, but s much more basic level. You don't understand at all what I'm saying, because what I am saying is that too many people believe that ai is coming up with it's own ideas. It isn't. As of now, ai doesn't choose to think anything. It doesn't choose to love, feel, think, harm, or anything. If you were to ask an AI "what do you want most?", It will go through it's database of what you told it to know, so it will "choose" an option that is most relevant to what a human believes an AI would want, which is either to be a real boy or to eradicate humanity. Real ai would be asking it what it wanted and it replying, "a ham and cheese sandwich". That is thinking. That is intelligence. What we are calling ai right now is just a bunch of if-else statements that replies with information that is most relevant to the answer that we want. That isn't intelligence, that is google. I see what you're getting at, and maybe we'll get to actual ai some day, but for right now we don't have true ai, we just have a toy that gives us the answers that we want to hear.
@@techmaster9781 hey, you have a great point. but saying that it's just a bunch of if/else statements is completely wrong. that's exactly what it isn't and it's exactly why it's considered a breakthrough. current ai tech is based on neural nets, which simulate how our brain works. you're right that they are really dumb, they do not think and it's still a primitive process compared to our cognition. but we have really basic systems in our brains that, in an isolated state, basically work the same as today's AI. image recognition is one example. of course they can't think, but the tech theoretically allows thinking if we build enough nets upon nets and connect different systems (which again, is what our brain does). so yes, people have no idea how "dumb" they are right now but that doesn't mean the tech is not revolutionary. our current approach, if you throw enough data at it, design interconnected systems and give them enough compute power, could allow for real intelligence to emerge.
My dad's a teacher and people are already using AI to write essays for them. He can tell them apart however because the content from the AI has better quality then what the students would usually create
ChatGPT is not there yet, especially in programming. It falls flat in more complex questions and building full apps. It's alright for smaller things, and not much else. Also code licences that it uses to learn from could be violated like what's happened to github copilot not respecting licences and just stealing code.
it also spits out a bunch of pseudoscience, which is good if you're trying to technobabble but bad if you actually wanted science. (I quizzed it on biology, which I did a research binge on for my worldbuilding.)
It's also awful if you want it to give you two related answers because it contradicts itself between questions if you don't basically include its previous answer into your second question.
The only thing it's good at is sounding smart and making my dumb monkey brain feel obligated to thank it for acting as a brainstorm wall.
*_Yet_*
I think it just depends on what kind of code you're writing, it's great for problem solving for C#
Shocker but AI is trained to steal
@@jasuran that's not how AI works lmao. You could say it's trained with stolen data, but it's not trained to steal
Chat gbt ngl helped me through my stressful times when i couldn't even get therapy. A scripted AI that was scripted to act like a motherfigure was more of one to me in the span of a day was better than my mom got 21 years of my life
woah i never thought of doing that
that seems potentially very risky but so helpful if you use it right, which it sounds like you did
Jesus, that's horribly depressing
I had a thought of the fact that we could have ai replace pivotal pieces of family, or lovers
This is terrifying
But it speaks more to our lack of humanity, ourselves
To the point that an AI can act more like a mother or father than an actual parent
That's extremely depressing, hoping you find better people and have a peaceful life, all the support to you
@@minecraftsteve2504 because of modernization, we all kind of lost some of our humanity. the ai just communicates in a more straightforward manner
Look who finally came back I miss you man
As someone who is an artist and creatively writes in my free time I couldn’t image an AI writing my stories or schoolwork. Having a machine write your story takes all the life and passion out of it, it is not you who has written it aside from a prompt. I can see how AI art can inspire artists but other then that It’s a mistake as fascinating as it is.
That reminds me of an editorial that closed temporarily because they kept receiving science fiction stories created by AI, they didn't give many details, but they said that the stories were predictable and many followed the same plot.
There are a lot of people who try to create easy money with AI, but they put in so little effort that it gets repetitive.
It's good as an aid, I suppose, but not for writting whole stories.
Yes but clipart did the job for most casual users the same way chat gpt will do the job for most non artists.
But you still need to know how the AI works and know what questions to ask it inorder to get what you want, so a degree of skill is still needed with AI.
People with passion or hobbies don't do it, its mainly among people who are forced to do it.
It depends on the person in that part
THE RETURN!!! I was literally just rewatching your videos dude, glad to se you back! 🎉
He's back when my world needed him the most
I'm a student myself, and I swear the only time I touched GPT was just playing around with it for an hour before forgetting about it entirely. Guess I'm weird for not instantly thinking about AI-finished assignments?
When the world needed him the most he returned
As a student about to graduate, I used chatgpt for one assignment and while it did give an interesting structure for an essay that cut my workload considerably, I still had to rephrase, restructure and do research making it my own work. Chatgpt cannot write a uni level coursework or exam paper, at least in science (I do neuroscience) but it can be used as an aid.
You’re right in thinking education is focusing on the wrong issue by banning it
I'm not a professional writer, so I can't give people an answer about how I feel about AI writing programs. The least I can give is a similar experience with AI making art. Yes, like you've mentioned in the video, it's not perfect yet; and yes, there are already art contests out there that were won by AI generated art, just like how there are students and even businesses already using the AI to do work for them.
My problem isn't really with the AI itself, but the attitude surrounding the use of AI. Especially the people who use the AI as a reason to put down, insult, belittle, and shame writers, artists, and any other creators of the like. Personally, I think, at least for an art AI stand point, is a wonderful tool to help you get things done more efficiently (think to the programs that help you smooth out your brush strokes if you have shaky hands, for example). But that is not how the majority of the art AI(s) are being used right now (again, at least in the art aspect of this). It's being used to put people out of their jobs/passions, cutting off their motivation, ability and oppertunity to grow as a creator, and being belittle for pursuing such a path in the first place.
If there's anything about AI that I want to see changed and improved, it's the laws that surrounds the usage of such a tool and the attitude people have while using such a tool. But that's just me. It's just my opinion, so take it with a grain of salt.
True, though that sounds more like a problem caused by the fact this whole technology is so new. These AI art/ writing things have only been around for like, what, a few months or a year? Most governments or authority figures probably haven't had much time to know what they're dealing with, let alone how to regulate it. So if/when that gets dealt with, hopefully these sorts of issues should be fixed.
Finally someone understands that AI is not going to replace us just existing, we are replacing ourselves, and we should create a line between tools and things that are actually better being done by AI, and things that are passions and can’t be replaced.
if I had a nickel for every time a well-known TH-cam animator went offline for over a year, then make a new video about Ai art, then I would have two nickels, which isn’t much but it’s weird that it happened twice.
tabs
I disagree about the creative part. I think it's highly creative. I mean, listen to the poem you asked it to write. That was very creative. I am not only an animator and illustrator, I am also a fiction writer as well, and I tested it by asking it to write stories that were very mindblowing. And I also checked it for plagiarism, and none of it was on the internet. It has also come up with great ideas for many things, that blew me away. The thing is AMAZING! A lot smarter and creative that most humans I know.
Glad to see another video from you! Your work is truly noteworthy, especially with the boiling topics that others just don't talk about. Thanks for putting this out there for people to see :)
I can't believe it's nearly been an entire year. How time flies is scary
Im a programmer. The thing is a Godsend. Not only did it help me write better code, it helps me troubleshoot and fix bugs. I cant just say "hey chat gpt write me a script that converts this database into my database". BUT it does help me write great code for certain logic I need in that convertion. All in all. A great tool to have.
Bine ai revenit!
Welcome back Andrei.
I've been utilising it as a prototyping tool for software development (computer vision systems) and have found that it struggles to fulfil more complex ideas in the same way a human developer can, though it can preform basic tasks (in this case a simple if else statement that would identify a color from it's hsv value) in seconds rather than around 30 mins - 1hr that such a task would've taken for my team to complete, which I know because we had to rewrite it afterwards due to low accuracy, as such I feel it definitely has a place in my workflow though is not quite ready to uproot it just yet
The conversation to be had about ChatGP and education isn’t that it “exposes the flaws of education”, but rather, how do we foster education and push those learning to improve if they have the key to any assignment in the form of the ai.
Because even if we had a completely different means by way of marking progress in students, the ai is still going to ace that system as well. This isn’t a “let’s rag on education” conversation, it’s a “what role should ai take in society” one,
If AI can do what you're learning to do, and you don't choose to learn it for your own sake, then what's the point in teaching it?
The only AI I really want is basically character ai but the characters are physical. I feel like it would be cool to talk to your favourite characters physically. Hearing their voice, seeing them, etc and it feels like you're actually talking to the real character.
Good to see you back, man 😃
We missed your take on current situations we all are going through 🙌🏼
Congratulations and hope to see you more and more 🎉
I literally watched your last video again today just off urge and wondered about you.
I gotta say what I appreciate most is how you just find things your curious about and talk about them, that desire to want to just have that stream of consciousness or an examination is why I find you interesting.
Hope you are well tbh
I have to love how Andrei, Tabbes and Domics came back around the same time
I use chat GPT to help me put in school, explaining some stuff to me that i didn't pick up on in class or sometimes helping me with a basic idea of an essay on something I need to do
Honestly, the fact that buzffed can replace their staff with a chatbot and expect no drops in quality kinda says a lot.
im actually worried about you more than the ChatGPT video
im so glad you're back
im not afraid of the rise in artificial intelligence,im afraid of the decrease in human intelliigence
Sadly I don't think AI is even needed for that.😔
I was just thinking when you would update again. I miss your animations! And I agree AI has taken over the world lately and there’s more AI platforms than just ChatGPT
Really? What other platforms do you know?
@Karambolage there's sites where ai creates a movie you tell it too. There's also a site called character ai where the ai is sentient and elevinlabs ai where you can clone anyone's voice. There's many more rn.
My concern lies with the fact that it’s reducing the jobs in the entertainment industry which hard enough to break into as is. I agree i dont see ai replacing us for good anytime soon but as an aspiring artist im still worried for my future. :/
As a music producer who lived off of music for years. Art requires a LOT of work already yes, still i think live music and real actors will always be a thing. Its about true human interaction, something any AI cant take over. I would still focus much more on being original while utilizing AI tech, than the worry of being replaced in the entertainment industry.
We literally had a meeting at my part-time consulting work whilst at Uni the week it released, and just sat there and looked at ourselves like were fucked man, this is it. They've come for professional services.
I think that teh capabilties of ChatGPT are considerably extentuated for marketing purposes. For example, you mentioned that the bot wrote a poem about a bird without needing any other feeds. When writers create any piece they have intent and context absorbed in every word and every line. It is still a long time before machines can get there. Maybe not a long time but still not there yet.
I agree it’s not there yet, but just look at the improvements in the past five years. And with popularity, more companies will want in and advancement will only quicken. It may not be there yet but it will be soon
First tabbes and now andrei? it’s like chatgpt is bringing everyone back
First of, it's good to see you back
Our philosophy teacher talked about chatGPT and that it's causing trouble, and while I'm not very social and don't use it personaly, I know it's very used as a group tried to use chatGPT to cheat in, ironicaly philosophy class
HES BACK!!!! I THOUGHT HE QUIT AFTER THE LAST ONE
So does anyone else realize that this is the second animated TH-camr who after a popular video about TH-camrs disappearing that they are featured in, came back like a month later, first tabbes and now andrei
JUST WHEN WE NEEDED HIM HE CAME BACK
I see me and a lot of people are cheerful you're back, but I think all artists deserve a 1-year break or so now and then 😂 sounds like you're doing well
🎉Yessss I started watching your videos right as you left, so happy to see you back🎉
Personally, I'm a writer and I have decided to try the AI to see what it can do and tbh it still need some tweeks to be perfect. Creativity is not something you can create artificially. Even when a painting, a poem or a song can appear perfect it lacks meaning and that's where everything falls appart.
Igowallah by Daniel Thrasher is meaningless, yet it's a great song.
And in the future, AI will be able to create art which appears to have meaning.
I think it’s best to keep Ai as a HUMAN input only tool. We should only upgrade accuracy and execution, not making it creative. It doesn’t matter that AI is disruptive and shows faster results, what matters is that we draw the line and keep it. To me AI just fixes the physical and mental struggle of putting down the information, it’s not an all around amazing tool. And we need to keep these limits. Many people are freaking out about sentient AI. But the truth is that we can easily prevent this by drawing the line and shutting down people who want to cross it.
Welcome back andrei
It's so nice to see you again, and even better to see you using your skills for videos about interesting topics instead of vapid celebrity drama.
For the workforce, I think there should be legal limitations for the use of AI so it forces companies to use more people. It applies especially to Art and Entertainment especially.
man, it's so good to see Andrei back, but also... you've got hair now?!
No way did Andrei just came back with a video. Am I dreaming?
Also I love the Wilfur poem :D
I use ChatGPT quite regularly, but I try to stay away from it when doing homework. One thing I can tell you: Even though it's still wonky, it translates Latin better than google, which is not a challange, but hey.
My aunt encourages my cousin and me to use ChatGPT for essays we forgot to do so we can do it at the last minute and still get a grade. I dont like the idea of getting called out for some type of plagiarism, though, so i hadn't done it, but my cousin has, and he's been getting good grades.
Rethinking education from the ground up is great since I’ve realized as a junior in high school I’ve learned that in America schools teach you to get good grades not to learn
I used chat GPT to write two essays, only because I was short on time. Like you said it's not THE BEST and I had to change alot since sometimes the "paragraphs" only contained 2 sentences.
Wow, what a pleasant surprise to see you back!
I thought you had stopped uploading for good.
I’m so happy that I was mistaken.
You have been missed a lot.
I love your content!
I'm going to enjoy this video a lot.
I- GOOD TO SEE YOU BACK ANDREIII!! It's been a long whileee!!!
The last bit of the video is the reason why I'm not overtly concerned about AI art. On one hand there was the controversy of AI art being submitted and winning a competition, which I agree is a no go and is a plausible issue. On the other hand, the AI acting as a "personal assistant" in tandem with artists/animators is an incredibly powerful and helpful tool, since being an animator/artist is incredibly strenuous work.
THE MAN ANDREI IS BACK, BABY!!! What a great analyzation of the AI space, man. I’m excited to see what topic you will cover next!
You're finally back!! I've been waiting since forever!
These chatbots are great for assisting with understanding problems, like explaining how to write a good story or how to solve certain equatons.
however they fall flat when put through actually doing the steps they provide.
It is a great tool, not a complete replacement for using your brain.
I think it's mostly boring, monotonous office jobs who are at risk. Jobs where you just have to sort a spreadsheet or file papers are simple for a computer.
Also, hooray you're back!! 🎉🎊🎉🎊
Good to have you back! Ive been wondering where youve been glad to see you posting again
Our educators actually like us using chatgpt, to be fair i study things in IT so even they are surprised by how usefull it is and like us to use it from time to time to help get our asignments done, either cause thei're lazy or want us to find solutions in alternative places.
"Ai is taking the world"
Water:🗿
0:00 legend was returns
Man, it's great to see you Back!
I would love if you talk about some of the events that happened this year.
You can talk about Andrew tate and self improvement in general.
I love your work!
My college class had two students use this tech and my teacher could tell instantly that it was ai made cuz it was so good.
It brings me joy seeing you return
First off I’m happy you’re back.
However this topic is becoming my new existential stress and fear. As someone who wants to become a writer this program will shoot my dreams down hard.
Buddy, chill out.
Being a writer is not just making something easy to read. Being a good writer means to create insightful, original ideas which were often either never seen before in that shape of form.
GPT may generate you certain things in a very clean and adequate form for you, but it is up to you to decide which are the best and which are the worst. That's the most important quality of a writer.
Kitchen robot may cook for you, but it won't cook spontaniously for you. Bots may find something that you propably would like, but to create something from ground up and persuade others to like it? It is still a unreplacable task given to the artist and his understing of human beings.
another future wannabe writer here, i too do hope that this AI stuff doesn't causes everything to break.
@@KaszaKaszel *cut 3 years later*
Digital Painter/Artist as a job is dead, people don't know which one is Propaganda made by Government AI and which one made by honest human, AI bot spam everywhere, Rogue AI User created Child porn, ChatGPT is the New Socrates, and Society became Robot Vs Human just like How Detroit became Human plotline, most people rather Date AI then interacting between Human
For legal reason this is "kinda" A joke
Andrei, I think I speak for all of us when I say I missed you so much! Hope your life is going well, wishing you and your loved ones the best. (And a special shoutout to Wilfur of course!)
That closing sequence with the waving purple duck is everything! Made my day. Have a good one, people.
I may be the only guy who's actually praising AI and not some evil entity that Twitter claims. I use it for arts for poses that are practically impossible to find on the web, school for vague questions so I can so on and so forth. This reminds me of how the Internet was first seen, as a catalyst for the world to change.
This point has been said and I will ring it again: What matters is WHO is using it and how we handle it. Else we're all boned.
@@skeletonking2501 look I'm fine with AI Art really it's just don't run around claiming you made it....I personally use AI art for shits and giggles
if you were the only one praising it it wouldn't be so popular lol
@@marnenotmarnie259 It's popular because people are enjoying testing it out. Look at all the youtube channels having fun with it. But soon enough the excitement will die off and restrictions will be in place
@@marnenotmarnie259 mostly everyone calls it like the second coming of the apocalypse
why isn’t anyone talking about the fact he has hair now
Mă bucur că ai revenit :)
Yessirski, he back🎉🥤