A Montana Man Has The Oldest DNA Native To America - And It Alters What We Know About Our Ancestors
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2021
- ►THANKS FOR WATCHING AND DON'T FORGET TO LIKE COMMENTS AND SUBSCRIBE!
If there are any Copyright Issues with any videos posted here i will Remove them. Please contact my Email : contact.us4yt@gmail.com
All images belong to its respectful owner, No copyright infringement is intended
A Montana Man Has The Oldest DNA Native To America - And It Alters What We Know About Our Ancestors
Darrell “Dusty” Crawford, whose Native American Blackfoot name is Lone Bull, looks over his results with fascination. He’d taken a DNA test with an outfit called Cellular Research Institute (CRI) and learned much about his heritage. What he doesn’t know yet is that the conclusions will also have implications for all Native Americans.
Tracing back history
The immediately astonishing thing about Crawford’s test is how far back the scientists at the CRI have traced his genetic history. In fact, the company has said that it has never managed to delve this far back in time before. And this achievement could force a rethink on the history of humans in the Americas.
► SUBSCRIBE US: goo.gl/CAyFbx
► Like us Our Facebook Page: goo.gl/SBs38W
► Follow On Twitter: goo.gl/nvhzU6
► Follow Us On Instagram : goo.gl/3UXcnx
► Audio by Scott Leffler -- scottleffler.com
#let_me_know #trending_stories #viralstory
The landbridge theory does not preclude other means of reaching+settling the Americas. I do not understand why the theories have to oppose each other.
They cannot scientifically oppose each other anymore. There have been many replacement events and many arrival events in the Americas.
Ships have been used since very ancient times archaeological finds are proving it
They don't! My problem with this pseudoscience is it only grabbed the data that they like and then they dismiss all the data they don't like!
The time scales in this are all inflated.
Some people just cannot stand uncertainty or seeming, not actual, contradictions. They seem to need simple answers for complex issues.
I'm of Polynesian descent. In our culture (Hawaiian), we have ni'oi (chili pepper) & 'uala (sweet potato), which originated in South America. There is archaeological evidence of the Polynesian "rocker" jaw from human remains in South America. There is further archaeological evidence that Polynesians populated islands throughout the Pacific via wayfinding navigation in double-hulled canoes; it's within the realm of possibility that there was mixing & trading between people at that time. Genetic evidence via DNA analysis lends further support to this idea.
I had not heard of the rocker jaw in South America, I will look for info about this. Quite jealous of it by the way: it really gives the face a nice line just below the ears.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The ancient Sān people in Southern Africa are genetically linked closest to homo erectus, the first hominids
@@chiknscratch 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@chiknscratch They might be closer to Erectus only because they seem to be the most ancient human group which evolved into modern humans. They are also a bit isolated genetically as they seem to have mostly been in isolation from other human groups for 200 000 years. At the same time, it is important to note the main thing: the most ancient modern humans=same intelligence and mental capacity, if you highlight the Erectus connection, it sounds like they might be less intelligent, with lower mental abilities.
Very interesting. Really a shame the music can't be switched off. It's like having a mosquito constantly buzzing around you.
I thought that was his voice!
Swat it Karen!
I always mute these things. Voice-overs are normally annoying since readers have the most annoying voices. Use closed captioning!!!
I have discovered transcripts!
@@glennbeginagain4603 I thought the circus was in town.
My husband is dark tan and so is one of his cousins. All the older family members swore they were native American. Took dna tests. They're Scottish🤣
Scottish have some interesting roots like African and Arabmatic decent from a long time ago
Scottish have African roots which is from the Tribe of Judah ✊🏾🥰
@@ameliatribeofissachar7311 both are true.
@@shawnahall7246 I wonder if that’s why the English warred against the Scotts? I have heard that the blue face paint they wore in Braveheart was actually symbolic of their dark skin.
remains from that land there Scotland and Britain. the person's skin was dark with blue eyes in those archeological finds.
A food staple of Aotearoa/New Zealand are kumara, a type of sweet potato native to Peru. Maori people brought Kumara with them when they settled here a thousand years ago. Polynesian people were trading with native American tribes centuries before Columbus "discovered" the Americas.
But why would that be the only item , also did the natives get anything in return tho. I’m aware of the sweet potato’s but like coconuts they are hardy and could travel on their own. The theory I seen it floated away from the Americas. Not saying impossible tho
They are the natives. They were originally Persians that fled the modern day India/Iranian area and traveled to the Mexico region of the gulf and made there way down across South America and mixed with the natives. They were known as the Chachapoya. They fled once again to Easter Island and abroad. They brought with them megalithic earth works, Pyramids, and the cult of the Birdman which lead to the culture spreading up to the great lakes region in Ohio etc
@@roblogs7168 the only problem with that theory is kumara doesn't travel well on its own. Kumara plants aren't as easy to preserve as potato plants. The plant can't travel across the ocean and grow by itself.
@@WEWUZEVERYONEBUTAFRIKANZ I believe there were ancient migrations that haven't come to light yet. Our ancestors were as intelligent and trade reliant as we are today. The truth is probably more interesting than we realise.
@@WEWUZEVERYONEBUTAFRIKANZ 😂your name explains it well culture vultures indeed
A big problem is that archaeologists will not rethink current theories because of their hubris. It’s alright to have been incorrect as long as you do the work to rework the theories. It’s not alright to stick your head in the sand because you are afraid to be wrong.
They are rethinking it. Thing is it takes time for just a bit of new information to trickle down to Colleges, schools, and maybe get into textbooks. Even longer to spread through much of the general public. Unless they are into things like this on TH-cam themselves.
This didn’t tell all either. Minute traces of Homo Denisova have been found among some of the indigenous of the Americas. The populations with the highest percentage of that are found in Oceana. Papua New Guinea, Melanesia, and Australia. Nowhere near the cave in the Altai Mountains where they first found a few bones and got DNA that wasn’t Homo Sapiens nor Homo Neanderthal. I know this but I bet none of my grandkids, grandnephews, grandnieces, and greats of the last two know it. Unless I told them. They were not very interested in all the fun stuff about ancient genomics I started hearing about six years ago. Svante Paabo, David Reich, Homo Neanderthals, how very mixed everybody is because of sexing with whoever as our species walked and invaded all over. And we all seem to share the same mother in Africa from about 200,000-150,000 years ago. No matter our shade we are “African”. Unless they discover our species evolved outside of Africa. Seems to be a chance that one of Homo Sapiens ancestors might have. So maybe everybody is Eurasian. Homo Neanderthals we’re. They were not just in Europe.
I love this stuff. An “up yours” to racists of any shade.
So what UR saying is Custers last stand was really the anniversary of the 1st proctologist in Montana ?
@@conniead5206 The 7 Daughter's of Eve by Bryan Sykes
I'm a professor but not of archeology. Still, in general, I don't think we are more or less proud than any other profession. And, of course, we want to advance our careers, but I don't know of any colleagues who intentionally keep their "head in the sand." The problem is often but not always two-sided: on one side, the media, pro journalists, and laymen TH-camrs almost never accurately describe an academic study, and they almost never completely understand the methods of the study, and they understand the concept of academic discourse even less.
The other side is that laymen seek out the middlemen for their information instead of going straight to the source. This means that laymen, as suggested by comments like yours, make judgements about academic and other pro researchers without ever reading any actual studies. A "big foot" discovery happens a lot more than people realize, but most of them or their methods are proven wrong relatively soon after they are made public. Right now, the discourse on this particular subject is dominated by the ice land theory. Why? You will probably never know if you just watch the news, documentaries, and TH-cam videos. Instead, visit your local college library.
Or because you don't want to lose your government funding. 🙄
My former Chinese boss said that the tracks go west across Beringia into the Eurasia following the game across Beringia.
I've heard stories trading with the peoples of Asia and Africa, I'll say it again, we're an old people.
Instead of showing random photos you use should relevant photos help the viewer visualize the story. Eg. Showing maps of the locations you refer too instead of a random photo of glaziers. Just my two cents 🤝
Most of the photos shown were of American Plains Indians and would not have been applicable to native Alaskan people. Possibly to some southern Canadian peoples.
I'd rather see maps as well.
Hey your first comment it only took 10 yrs troll bot
That's interesting. Pacific peoples were incredibly skilled navigators and Māori oral histories say that their ancestors travelled as far as the Americas.
These ppl don’t honor oral history unfortunately
Yes, if you are interested, there is an interesting documentary on you tube about the ancient history of New Zealand. I think it's called Underneith the Carpet (because so much history there is hidden or destroyed).
@@k8eekatt Thanks. Not heard of it. Will hunt it out.
@@k8eekatt Found it. Cheers.
th-cam.com/video/qfxTqlkYEPc/w-d-xo.html
@@nikiTricoteuse great!
The Native American idea of them coming from caves, or underground, are talking about how people survived the younger Dryas cataclysm, the survivors later emurged from "the ground" a new people. This is also the Origin story of many of the people of South America.
I am the quintessential European. The archeologists found the first agricultural tools near my ancestral home. It all goes back to gobekli tepe in Anatolia. Some of the women matching me say they are native American. They are either wrong, or the solutreans came across the sea long ago. I am thinking they are mistaken, but who knows.
@@bengreen4343 None of us just popped in from nowhere. We are all descendants of the ancients. It really doesn’t matter
@@bengreen4343 If thats true then how to explain the dna connection to far east Asians? Specifically those of Siberian tribes. If they have "always been here" then instead of migration from Siberia it was the other way round? They wouldnt neccesarily have to walk along an ancient land bridge to do it, they could have island hopped by boat across the Bering sea.
@@bengreen4343 Slave trade of far East Asians? Guess I missed that part in history class...unless you're suggesting the native Americans had a slave trade from the Eurasian continent before Europeans arrived?
@@bengreen4343 *doesnt exist. Fixed it for ya
I have been saying that for years.... "No one is pure". This was a very interesting video! I find DNA so interesting. My maternal grandmother told me when I was small that she was pure Castilian. I at a young age told her there was no way she was pure with all the years of human evolution and migration. Doing my DNA proved to me that my family IS way more mixed then anyone of us truly knew. We had many ethnicities we were not even aware of that popped up in my DNA. Its good to have an opened mind when doing your DNA. A racist neighbor did his DNA and went on a rant for days about there was no way he had this and that. So maybe only do your DNA if you are OPEN to what you will discover. 😊👍
I did mine, and it came back Irish, and Portuguese, which was a shocker to me, as my mums family has been in the same place in Holland, since the early 1500’s. Since then, they’ve reworked it and the Portuguese has disappeared, but still it doesn’t show up as “Dutch”. So, I’m not sure what to believe.
Two identical twins in Canada came back with totally different DNA results....so who knows how accurate these companies are? One of the twins works on a sports channel in Toronto...the last name is Agro if you want to check!
@@Bella-gj6wc Since there really is no such thing as race, they have to compare you to populations. Basically it's more where than race. They also only compare you to their own database. The bigger the database, the better the date. What happened to you is that more and more people took the test, so they have a bigger population to be more accurate. So tell me this: If a family moved to Holland from Africa, but only had children with other people with DNA from the same area, and a few hundred years passed, would they not be "Dutch". (and yes, I know this didn't happen, it is an example to illustrate the part you are missing".
The dna test goes back to 500 to 600 years and many people are pure within this range. For example a person who is Indian had a Mestizo child( Indian n European) and that child procreate with another White person who is pure and that child with another White person and that child with another White person that offspring returns back to 100% within 4 or t generations. The Indian blood is eventually washed out of that bloodline.
@@celticmulato2609 Someone failed science.
I think we have a tendency to underestimate our ancestors just because their technology isn't modern doesn't mean it wasn't advanced remember we built some of the greatest civilizations in the world from the Incas to the Inuits Aztecs navajos Apache Blackfoot in between and of course the Cherokee Powhatan and other tribes our ancestors we're just as bright as those in Europe, Asia, Africa etc ❤️
Yes, just as bright. But the dissemination of discoveries and linking information didn't happen the way it finally did in western Europe after the Dark Ages. During the pooping out of civilization with the fall of the Roman Empire, luckily the chains of Christian monasteries which shared the common language of Latin, allowed for ideas to flourish. This didn't happen in the Americas so outsiders assumed that "native" Americans were not bright. A lot depends on sheer luck as to place of birth, local customs, access to information and muscle mass determining brainpower. (We are still struggling with that last one today. So women don't have bulging biceps. Female arm muscles long ago migrated to the chest for support of a vital function, i.e.breastfeeding. Men lift; women nurse.) But none of these lost opportunities denote a lack of intelligence. These ancient people were pretty savvy. And all of them all over the world kept evolving and improving. Yes!
Thank you!!
Europeans are collecting and claiming the indigenous ppl and customs. They never planned to paint ur culture in a positive light until they have taken it over and are the face of said culture!
They have survived polar environments
I don't consider inuits a great civilization. They were successful in life but didn't build anything that lasted. The definition of a civilization is the stage of human social and cultural development and organization that is considered most advanced.
It's so funny. I met a Mongolian (Russian) 35 years ago. I told him he looked just like my grandmother. She was Cherokee. He said oh yeah we're related. Glad science is catching up 😜
It's not actually new the idea that Siberians and Native Americans are related. I mean I learned about that, for example, in 1991 or 1992 in a history class, though, of course, long before that I was taught that Natives crossed over from Siberia.
I'm moroccan native north African I get mistaken by native North American
If you LIVE on this planet you BELONG on this planet. LOL! No problems.
It's known that folks were paddling up and down the Pacific coast for thousands of years, some taking time to live on islands and the mainland. Check out the folks that are now based along British Columbia's coast. These people are as comfortable in big canoes as they are on land. They are all about the Pacific. How hard would it be for some boats to travel down to South America and stay there?
The ocean people from Japan up to Russia, Alaska and down the coast of the Americas, would have used the ocean to move in small boats. The same is true with the South Pacific. However, if a classically trained paleontologist doesn't discover artifacts that show ancient ocean voyages, then it didn't happen.
What would it take? A boat made of wood from Asia trapped in a bog in the americas that dates back to an old enough time period for them to believe.
But then the people invested in the land bridge theory as the only methodology would have to open their minds.
Agree, that land bridge idea is implausible.
@@ensenadorjones4224 In my experience, anthropologists etc are too happy when there is a new discovery, but as you posted: they need SOMETHING to evidence it. Marija Gimbutas had a really good theory, which was only proven right after she died.
Boats would certainly be a lot easier than this theory. It also opens up the possible that people have been in the Americas far longer than we thought
@@BobSmith-un5mw Look up the human footprints found and dated in the southwest US. Humans have DEFINITELY been here longer than most modern people want to admit.
It doesn't matter whether you're from the Siberian peninsula or from the British Isles or from America we all came from the same gene pool.
Hopefully not by inbreeding.
I believe they have already found several variations. The "Peer Review" + "Journal Published" findings don't get much attention on Mainstream Medias, particularly when Findings do not support the "Mainstream Academic" 19th Century, Theory based Paradigm.
David Reich, PhD, Geneticist, Harvard, the respected source of "DNA Mapping of Migrations Globally" found that "Not All are Out of Africa", repeated 3 Times to Confirm, and "Peer Reviewed" + "Journal Published", 3 Years Ago.
Authentic Academics follow the "Standards of Science and Research", "Mainstream Academia" do not, *the Standards prohibit using a Theory as Fact.*
There's an emerging focus on, the "Standards" and Fearless Young Professionals anxious to have Freedom to Explore and Discover.
The "Theory" has slowed progress with a most Dogmatic like Belief, and Fundamentalist Attitude, it is fully outside if Scientific, it is observable Ego Mind behaviors.
Academia requires Higher Mind, it's where Wisdom resides.
I trust there's a Positive Transformation in process.
Beth
Sociologist/Behavioralist
and Historian
Noo
No. We all do not come from the same Gene pool.
@@EdenSophia118really? Why not?
Artifacts on the west coast of South America match Japanese and pacific Islander artifacts.
but the dna doesn't
@@standingbear998 they found genetic markers of Irish origin in the mitochondrial DNA of the Paracas skulls in Peru. And the red haired mummies in the Atacama.
The pacific islanders, Polynesians, definitely made it island hopping.
@@PimpDaddyDisco Did that guy finally get some DNA results back? I stopped checking.
Would have been nice if there was more about the man in question.
Japan, as such, wasn't a thing back then. 'Japanese' people, like 'Korean' people started out as 'Chinese'.
Yes! The background music conundrum. Very distracting. Movies that have people,, children, whispering with music blaring in the background😱 SHUT THE MUSIC OFF.
High frequency hearing loss. You need hearing aids. See an audiologist.
I don’t hear any music in the background at all ?!? All I hear is a voice talking…
Edited: I held the phone speaker direct up pressed into my ear and I could hear the quietest barely there music. I can’t hear it at all whatsoever when holding phone up to my fave even. How did you not only hear it but thought it was loud?!?
And leave out the annoying transitions
@@ThePowerflake Lovely non-inclusive comment. Proud of yourself?
@@lijohnyoutube101 Because I was not using loudspekers and do not use headphones: they wreck your hearing.
Plural of Blackfoot is still Blackfoot. Not feet. And yes no background music, too distracting
Thank you!
Thank you! Im not even Blackfoot(as far as I know) and very disappointed that this misinformation is now firmly planted in ignorant minds.
There is still an Indigenous Copper Colored American Indian tribe called Blackfeet in Southeast America.
@@Alexandria.Washingtonthat's not even a tribe.
Further proof we have NEVER left. Native North America is alive and still very native.
Any ancient human who could walk or row/sail a boat, would’ve been tempted to travel from it to anywhere on the planet.
Yes and no. Most people travel with a goal: CColumbus wanted to find the road to India to save money on spices imports, the queen who bankrolled him wanted gold. Governments or big companies explore for material gains. They will sponsor people who can help them achieve that: missionaries, botanists, armies...
People emigrate often just because they want to survive, escape oppression or hunger or cataclysms, and when that is the case, they travel in groups.
Pure explorers are usually lone people. Amundsen, Scott (what an idiot that one was), Magellan, Herzog (Annapurna)...Of course, it is dangerous or expensive business, so they have to find support and sponsors.
You will find, that there are a lot of people who absolutely do not want to just go and see what's beyond the horizon, and it breaks their hearts when they have to leave home.
And this is why my Native American grandmother looked Japanese. FACT.
😂😂😂😂😂
Everyone knows Americans came from Asia. It's when and how long ago that remains a mystery.
@@sandraleiva1633 the Americas have 2 coasts, now what.
@@jacklynnmjackson2383 America.
@@jacklynnmjackson2383lol Yup the video just confirmed multiple migrations and regions make up native people. Just like various black Americans have varying African roots and mix of other ethnicities.
Exactly! Fishing and philandering.
Recent findings of Denisovan and Neandrathal DNA among the Natives in the Americas was very interesting.
And more studies show that some DNA comes from Central Asia specifically Northern Kazakhstan, and from East Asian specifically Mongolia. And of course that Lake Baikal find where they found the closest ancestor and more DNA proof. As a person who is a Dakota, I feel so close culturally to the Mongolians and Kazakhs. Nomadic peoples who wandered the vast Eurasian Steppe, unite my people with those nations. I don't know but every time I see Kazakhs and Mongols, I can't help saying "cousin" hahaha
Bottom line is that all the First Nations people are is the result of thousands of years of migration. Our genetic make up is all over the place just like everyone else. And I don't believe we were always here, that's just a fairytale.
@@JackDiamond21 native Americans n Mongolians def have a similar look
@@JackDiamond21
Turk/Hittites also are your cousins and mine too
See the language correlations
ONCE OUT OF AFRICA 🌍 EVERY ONE WAS MIXING.. CLIOSET TO PURE IS THE VERY DARK BLK SKIN ACTRESS .. BE BK WITH HER NAME. I AM ON DOCUMENT BLK OF NEGRO OF COLORED & HAVE 10% NEANDERTHAL.🦧. SMH
Polynesian captain of boat “ but we were only on a three hr cruise”.
Much better content than I had ever seen you do. Are you improving? This was pretty good.
Who ancestors
There was so many types of humans living on this side of the earth before the European invasion of this side of the earth.
People on Earth all descend from their Ancestors from every inch of earth.
Fascinating information, although the swirly photographic technique is unpleasant and would induce a less-sturdy person to have sea-sickness.
Not to mention the annoying music.
Thanks for posting! Lots of
enlightening info! 😀😃 I found your production with the blurred and energetic photos evolving into a focused photo very disconcerting. 😒😬 but perhaps that is just a personal issue. Have a great day!
Ja jeg er 76 år. I min oppvekst i Molde, Norge var vi alle nesten sorthårete rundt kaffrbordet i alle år. Min bestemor hadde aske farget hår som folket på Grønland. Vi bodde jo ved kysten med lang skipshistorie. De fleste her ved kysten vår mørkhåret. Vi hadde ALDRI sett en Afrikaner. Vi såg ikke at vi hadde trekk fra Østen eller mellom Østen, eller Grønnland. Det var noen som var rett nedstammer fra Mexico og Japan, Kina men vi var uvitende. Det var før fjernsynets tid. Men husker jeg syntes min mor, tante bestemor og onkler var vakre med sitt mørkebrune hår. Min far var fra Bergen, der var det Japanske gener, men han var blond. Dette ble jeg veldig bevist om som voksen. Men få mennesker er interessert i å se dette. Jeg synes det er drømmende, og interessant og føler slektskap med andre nasjoner. Litt Morro må en da ha her i livet 😎😊😙🤗
You wanna start an argument with native Americans, tell them that they migrated to North America from Siberia.
White people came from Africa, that argument isn’t irrelevant to your agenda to discredit native people from their native lands. Even 7 thousand years back blonde people didn’t even exist
WhenI was studying anthropology in the 1990s one of my professors discussed the theory that people from Asia & Polynesia traversed the Pacific to South America, as there is some evidence not only based on genetics but artifacts, including pottery that is strikingly similar to Pacific Island artifacts.
there are also findings in northeast brazil, 30000 year old. people of african origin. they seemed to got extinct before other people arrived. they did not leave a genetical trace in the people who live there now or 1000 years ago.
When I was about 5 I discovered that there were other boys like me, who had a mother and a father, and that changed everything.
@@SunRabbit good to know. Do you feel different now? If yes, why? what changed for you?
That's good. I think were more than one land bridge that surfaced.
@@mweskamppp I realised I was just as human as everybody else.
I am Polynesia
Maori from New Zealand. I find this very interesting.
Today's, scientist, archaeologists, anthropologists are still trying to figure out Native American indigenous original people's DNA from the Americas so many people have their own theories of where Native American here where they came from who are their ancestors for our DNA unique. Some Tribes have some small amount of Asian blood but there's some Travis don't have any Asian blood. I believe my people have been here for thousands of years in science is just too young to understand us ancient people of the Americas. It's not from Europe, Africa, Asia. The world is older then they think and there has been many old ancient civilizations that have been forgotten. Every day we continue to learn and history rewrites yourself everyday with new discoveries of the Americas.
The music played in the background is very obtrusive. It is mechanical, repetitive, and very un-interesting.
natives of all parts of america were once togther living. but they separated, the spirits ordered them to go. Because of the white man, and spanish. they lived on the east coast. they went west, south and north and became a little distinct from each other.
I've found that when you take a different test, you get different answers. But you have to consider they use different data bases.
Exactly different databases that are just genetic pieces that keep changing due to updates. Also, twins can have a different genetic makeup I personally don't think they know as much about genetics or history, ect.as they think they know the more I research
they are also testing over different time periods
the tests you can buy as a private person are not reliable, and they are different from the analyses scientifics do on old DNA
I think people have came back and forth by every means mentioned. The most dangerous journey would be sailing across the Atlantic.
Once a pole is covered in ice. There is no limit to where people can cross. Back during the ice age you could dogsled north across the North Pole via Greenland and come out on the other side of the world in Australia. Someone from Australia could walked along the southern ice sheets to Africa, and Patagonia in South America. The ice age didn’t just create a sheet of ice across the Northern Hemisphere. It covered the Southern Hemisphere too.
Video starts around 15:00, remainder is backstory as generally thought.
Thank you!!
Thanx
Thank you
Thank you. I was getting sick of the other garbage
I find DNA Haplogroups fascinating.
My father's Haplogroup is (A) goes back 275,000 years it's the Adam of Male Haplogroups found thus far.
One thing I really wish humans would take into account deep inside we are ALL African and a Haplogroup is just a mutation, sort of a hiccup that would change something within that may present itself outwardly that is passed on to your sons or daughters.
My mom's Mitochondria is L3
and again, my Dad is A, which brings to mind what was said in the starwars movie years ago!
I AM YOUR FATHER 😁
Why do you wish people believe "deep inside we are ALL African..."?
Well Said ! May the Force Be With You !
There was no 'Africa' back then. We're all just human. And we came from Pangaea.
@@DandelyonDawn Pangaea broke up 200 m yrs ago. It took more than 100m yrs before even primates evolved. We all came from Africa.
@@beachbum200009 except there was no Africa back then. Zoom
A Blackfoot shaman told me that the oral history passed to her from her grandmother was that her people came from the east - EAST! - on boats over the Atlantic. This is the story passed to each generation unaltered since it happened.
I also once met a linguist researcher from Syria. For his theses research he spent a couple of years with the Navajos in New Mexico. His conclusion was that Navajos and Bedouin were a related race. He said, "They (Navahos) have a similar culture and traditions as we (Bedouins) do, just that they have horses like we have camels.
Researching your Ancestry is very, very interesting we all should you will be surprised!!🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄
Except for the whole surrender your DNA to a corporate entity, to be used in any way that they see fit.
@@PimpDaddyDisco Hi Drew, when I looked at my ancestors so you think that they would use it I do to especially china like they do on TikTok, get our information!!😊
@8:40 where he speaks about the many 1st people's/Indigenous Native American People's beliefs of their origin, was that they came out of the grounds/from which the ant people had saved their grandparents or parents by helping and taking them underground to avoid the death(I don't recall what catastrophe words used, if it was floods, pole shifts, harsh sun flares, radioactivity from the sun or what) which I believe was the floods or something from the sun and that they stayed inside a massive underground city in the Grand Canyon, with one tribe at least still living near where they believe they came up and out.
I 1000% believe this story, That there is a huge underground city that protected them from solar flares or floods or a combination of them maybe, and that maybe they were ant people because of some kind of gear/suit worn by people in the know of what was happening, or by people who were different so they stayed hidden underground most of their lives and/or who lived underground due to the heat and/or weather, or maybe had some genetic issue that didn't allow them to breath our surface air or be in the sun or something like that maybe...or they could have been grays, or fallen angels who never took human wives!!! So many possibilities about the ant people!!!!!!!
One big happy family we humans. Well.. genetically related.
Excellent video 📹 New subscriber. Thank you for sharing the Knowledge 🧠
I have done the Nebula genetic tests, and transferred it over to Yfull. But I have no idea how to work with the info. It would be so interesting, but at last it is above my comprehension. Any tips on how I can figure this out. I wanted to find out my ancestry but also can't figure that out either.
I think (based on thinking not knowledge, value it as such) our idea that human developement is "linear" from un-developed to a developed human today probably is at best problematic and hindering our study of history of humanity. Considering how destructive we can be I theorise we have a more serpentine historic trajectory with more or less huge ups and downs in development...
I imagine that the ancestors of modern native American peoples came from many different areas. They would not have come in one group. They may have come across each other either coming or going over thousands of years.
Not all Native Americans are the same. That includes South and Central American peoples.
This is also true of Indigenous Australians. They came in waves. A few people here, a few families there. Island hopping over thousands of years after crossing out of Africa to what is now southern India. Different people took different routes. They arrived at different times. Some incoming people probably displaced those already inhabiting an area, pushing some people further into the interior.
All Americans are the same. The Iroquois, the Navajo, the Aztecs, the Mayas, the Arawaks and the Inca were ALL the same people. Americans.
When I studies Anthropology, Geography, and Biology at the University, I had this theory exactly. I was ignored and shrugged off. I hold firm in my theory to this day. Look at South Pacific water currents, the fact that South American Natives have older DNA than do North American natives. Cultural practices in South America closely match those of the Pacific Islanders. It is possible that both theories hold up and there are two distinct DNA paths, (one from Islanders and one from Siberian region) We can also find artifacts in South America that date farther back than ones in North America. Just saying!
Trust the dna man .
There was a group of New Zealand Māori (Māori are classified under the Polynesian sub group), who took part in the National Geographic Genome Project.
Surprisingly, the results for their 'deep-ancestry' (between a time period of 1000-5000 years ago) showed ancient dna links to Egypt, Iran and South America. Their immediate ancestry was South East Asia, Polynesia and Melanesia which makes sense given the geographic location
The migration paths were very interesting so those results somewhat confirm your theory
@@_.Marz._ There are 3 out of hundreds of tribes in South America that share approximately 2% of their tracible DNA (all humans share 99.9% identical DNA) with Aboriginal Australians. The rest of their DNA is linked directly to ALL other tribes in North, Central, and South America. All of this DNA links pretty directly to East Asia.
There are 3 out of hundreds of tribes in South America that share approximately 2% of their tracible DNA (all humans share 99.9% identical DNA) with Aboriginal Australians. The rest of their DNA is linked directly to ALL other tribes in North, Central, and South America. All of this DNA links pretty directly to East Asia. This means that 2% of 0.1% of their DNA is reflective of that found in Australia and the Polynesian islands, which is pretty telling.
the Bantu expansion triggered the migrations to the Pascific. Pre Eygpt civilizations sought climate conditions akin to the wet Sharhara aka garden of Aton aka EDEN.there was no greek miricle either
A Montana man isn't the oldest, but very new. Footprints in White Sands and Gault site are far older (over 20,000 years ago) and had prevailed in the First Americans theme. Those are more strongly related to " Who, from Where, How ? "ーRSaPJ
I'd like to see where that small percentage of Sierra Leon comes from, I'm Ojibwa and also have that
I used CSI because they claimed to go back 55 generations or so. I expected to see Genghis Kahn and African (cradle of civilization) drops - and they were present as expected. I was curious to know how much Scottish vs English - the only 2 heritages ever claimed in family history with customs to back it up but was/still am, floored to find out that what I was told was not the truth. not just my parents but the extended family covered up our majority (nearly 50% for me) German roots. I look too much like both parents for it to be "the mailman" I'll never learn why/how as they're all gone, I suspect it was based in Hitler fear? my mothers father, my guess of the German side/origins, was born in 1906. but in America and from a long line of American born people. it's weird to find out your real history.
Genghis kahn was a paleface
I'm finding the same thing in my family. The great, great grandfather claimed to be all German. But now that I'm looking back, there's apparently a lot of Jewish roots no one ever acknowledged.
My mom is English/Scottish and Irish but 15% German shows up in my test. But my ancestors are from Norfolk - settled by the Angles… so heavy German influence. Have a titch Italian on that side too. And if you look to history at the Roman invasion - notably in East Anglia it addresses why it shows up in my report.
Very informative,Thankyou
It only changes the academic "theory." The tribes have always known their stories. In general, each language group has a different migration story and some have origin stories that start here on Turtle Island.
They are not different theories, they are independent migrations of different groups.
More recent archeological finds in Cooper's Landing, Idaho and New Mexico further support diverse migration stories. It's time to decolonize the academic records. We could start by recognizing that Indigenous people are a living culture and not an "archaic" people. It's amazing what you could learn if they simply ask and take time to listen.
As I understand it, the Algonquin people came from an area in Eastern Europe and sailed across the Bering Strait long before any ice bridge. Those who speak the Souian language are said to have followed the Mastadons across the ice. Others came by boats from the Pacific, others the Atlantic. They all know their migration stories as well as origin stories and creation stories. Scientists would do well to understand the differences between these oral traditions.
Anthropologists from outside have not been allowed into the secret societies that pass those stories down. There is a valid and understandable reason for that, but it makes it hard to blame the trope of "European colonialists" for the fact descendants of Europeans in the Americas, are not being taught things that many different tribes have gone to great lengths to keep secret from outsiders.
@@adammillwardart7831Lmao... I don't belong to any secret society. I'm not even Indigenous myself (some of my ancestors are). Yet, I know the stories.
@@danyellerobinson5940 Where were you taught those stories, and how do you know they are true?
If the last ice age had living surfaces 400 ft below us, wouldn’t we be able to measure the depth of the Bering Straits to see if humans were actually able to cross on foot?
You don't need there was the ice cap anyway
..the maps of migration times at 13.44 show the arrival of people in New Zealand around 1500 bp, ..actually @ 700bp..
There is some pretty compelling evidence that early Asian made it to North America by boat earlier than the land bridge crossing, which explains the high Asian makeup of Native Americans.
Fascinating!!!
Thanks
I'm really not clear on what people were doing before the Ice Age. Who's to say whether or not some traveler from the Pacific landed here somehow prior to the Ice Age. When the tribes oral history says they came out of the ground that could mean a cave or even a vast series of caverns. They left no written or otherwise records because they were nomadic. Is this a possibility?
Modern humans as a species arose during the last ice age. We are all modern humans as a species even though we have traces of other DNA.
It just makes sense that humans arrived from different areas at different times. And while some groups would wipe out others intentionally AND unintentionally, Some would come together to create a whole new culture.
I’m dont understand why anyone would ever think that people only did one thing in one particular way. We constantly find things that shows cultures that we didn’t think knew anything about each other, DID know about each other and even shared knowledge
The Max Planck should get a Nobel prize if it hasn't. The name continues to arise in diverse contributions to science and humanity.
Nobel prizes are handed out to individuals, though. (Max Planck did get one... which is why the institute is named after him...)
Svante Pääbo, Max Planck Institute, received the Nobel Prize just over a month ago, for his ground-breaking genetic research.
You can also use Language Families, archaeology, and Native stories to track Migration. In my research, I found the Blackfoot originated in the Eastern Woodlands or near the New York area. In the 1300s the massive storms of the Mini Ice Age, probably caused the Blackfeet to move to the Great Lakes area, then because of the Iriqouis doing bad things during the Beaver Wars in the mid-1600s, dozens of tribes walked out West in the 1700s.
I hope this helps,
So the video simultaneously states that they traced the DNA lineage back "55 generations" and also that it went back "17,000 years" which would make each generation 300 years... so that doesn't quite add up. Maybe they meant to say "17 hundred years ago" (1700) rather than 17 thousand?
That would include their living in a different area of the globe, like China, Thailand etc. These countries would have had different names of course then. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
They do not. The other route was via the Aleutian Islands . Cynthia Allen McLaglen
He also referred to "ancestors" as "descendants" when speaking of Crawford's forebearers.
Also, it is widely accepted that Polynesians didn't arise until around 1500BC well after Native Americans populated the Americas. Perhaps Crawford had a more recent ancestor who came from Polynesia.
@@Cylawyer
N.Z. Maoris lands were Submerged 11.5k yrs ago..
My DNA is one of the oldest on the planet I am 1/2 Native american and 1/2 Norwegian my DNA Dates back before Sumeria. My DNA is one the king list . My family tree is on display in Massachusetts.
Boooooooo !!!!
@@LiesandMoreLies ???booo
@@LiesandMoreLies I am proud of my history. 𒄿 𒄠 𒂗 𒃞 𒇻 𒁹
Sorry to disappoint you but your dna is not one of the oldest.😂😂
Micro D energy
I went to correct "BlackFEET" to "BlackFOOT" but a quick Google search revealed that "foot" has been changed to "feet" by the tribes people in the USA. Formally changed according to Google. I am Canadian, my ancestors have always been known by sikiska name translated to "BlackFOOT". I certainly hope Canadian Blackfoots do not adopt the the US moniker.
Oldest known dna viable enough to study. Footprints in New Mexico are believed to be at least 23,000 years old.
natives have been in the americas longer than 17000 years...MUCH longer
I have this ancestry. Related to Beringian Child, Montana Boy, Kennewick Man and Montana Clovis Man.
Emblem of America1798 I do to
@@gew2027 first families of Virginia
The transitions in this video make it really hard to watch. But I can close my eyes and listen.
Doesn't this also help confirm the theory there were advanced civilizations on this planet before the Younger Dryas period? We weren't just cave men & hunter gatherers, but sea faring global navigators. This also woukd be the last time the Sahara was lush with vegetation and Antarctica had habitable locations......The Plot Thickens!
Why would I hit the "like" button BEFORE viewing the video?
My haplo type is B2 pre Columbian goes back 140,000.
For got to add the c it was B2c.
PCA is a mathematical transformation that reduces the dimensionality of the data to a smaller set of uncorre- lated dimensions called principal components (PCs), which has numerous applications in science. In population genetics alone, PCA usage is ubiquitous, with dozen standard applications. PCA is typically the first and primary analysis, and its outcomes determine the study design. That PCA is completely non-parametric is the source of its strength. Any genotype dataset can be rapidly processed with no concerns about parameters or data validity. It is also a weakness because the answer is unique and depends on the particular dataset, which is when reliability, robustness, and reproducibility become a concern. The implicit expectation employed by PCA users is that the variance explained along the first two PCs provides a reasonable representation of the complete dataset. When this variance is minuscule (as often with human populations), it poorly represents the data. Rather than consider using alternative analyses, authors often choose not to report the variation explained by PCA. Regardless, it is not a proxy for the reliability of the results.
Here, we carried out extensive analyses on twelve PCA applicaitons, using model- and real-populations to evaluate the reliability, robustness, and reproducibility of PCA. We found that PCA failed in all criteria and showed how easily it could generate erroneous, contradictory, and absurd results. This is not surprising because PCA is blind to the data and their meaning. The covariance matrix is calculated from the centered matrix itself created simply by subtracting the mean A, from the original matrix A, disregarding the weights and geography. The remaining transformation consists of the dimensionality reduction, which is less problematic; however, that the first two PCs that capture most, but still a very small part of the genetic variation, are typically analyzed creates further misinterpretations. Given the omnipresence of PCA in science, an intriguing question is whether multidisciplinary PCA results should be reevaluated? Based on our analyses and critical evaluations published elsewhere, we cannot dismiss this possibility.
As PCA lacks any measurable significance or accuracy, we argue that its dominance in population genetics could not have been achieved without the adoption of two fallacies: cherry-picking or circular reasoning (i.c.. "exploration"), the screening and selecting PCA scatterplots that fit preconceived hypotheses while ignoring the other plots, and the a priori where PCA results are interpreted based on pre-existing knowledge because PCA scatterplots are uninformative a posteriori. As a "black box" basking in bioinformatic glory free from any enforceable proper usage rules, PCA misappropriations, demonstrated here for the first time, are nearly impos sible to spot.
The fact that population affinities vary appreciably between closely related, ostensively equivalent datasets is deeply worrying (PCA applications were cited 32,000-216,000 times). Researchers from adjacent fields like animal and plant or medical genetics may be even less aware of the inherent biases in PCA and the variety of nonsensical results that it can generate. We consider PCA scatterplots analogous to Rorschach plots. We find PCA unsuitable for population genetic investigations and recommend reevaluating all PCA-based studies.
That is very interesting my CRI DNA test says I am 3.8% Native American. Which is a little unexpected because I am from Aotearoa( New Zealand) trace my heritage back to the first Waka (Maori canoe) to arrive in Aotearoa.
Maybe they should make a video about my DNA because it doesn’t look like it was a one way journey to the America’s
Native Americans are mostly Q and C paternal haplogroups. Eurasian and African. The maternal non recombinant mtDNA haplogroups are A, B (Semitic) and C, D Eurasian. There are other haplogroups too.
My Father is (A)
Which I've learned is the Adam of all Male lines, none older have been found YET!
@@worldtraveler134 That’s a belief. Ham was the youngest son of Noah.
My maternal haplogroup is C1..Ive done 4 genetic tests and was able to trace back pretty far. My moms Puerto Rican so I already knew a lot about my family history, but it was pretty cool validating My ancestors were Taino. The 1st indigenous people that lived on Puerto Rico before Columbus came. DNA is wild!
But I believe Q and C had different starting points and migration routes. They first merged in the Beringia, areas but not before.
@@moth7457 Yes, the Q paternal haplogroup is the descendants of the Medes and the C paternal haplogroup is the descendants of King Nimrod the son of Cush (AB Y hgs)
Since there is proof that Native Americans have been on the North American Continent for more than 50,000 years , why has nobody thought about the idea that maybe about 13,000 years ago some Native Americans crossed The Land Bridge from Alaska to Siberia , or maybe even earlier than that ? Today , if you are standing in Alaske on the west coast you can see land on the other side , maybe they made a boat and went the other way . Everyone just assumes that it was the other way around .
Challenges popular scientific theory...
They went both ways lots of times. Also Polynesians made it to South America (as per recent DNA studies) and people lived in Florida with no modern analogue (Wendover Pond Bodies). Change is the only constant and all peoples are "old."
Think U r right! We came by land and sea, like everyone else traveled back then. There was millions of us, the Natives numbers and narrative is so skewed, you can hardly find any truth in it anymore. Wave after wave after wave came from Asia/Eurasia. We got isolated for centuries bc of the ice age, and so did a big wave of ppl ,got isolated in Beringia. Flow started again soon as ice allowed.
@@SaneAsylum Please link the DNA studies.
@@veridicusmaximus6010 TH-cam doesn't like when I add links but I'll try.
Natives around the great lakes area have Denisovan DNA in them, if you follow the migration path of them, they went to Africa, the South Asia, then AUS. and then onto South America and finally up too North America... but in order for them to mix DNA, Natives had to exists BEFORE the Denisovans got here... Nat Geo did a story on the dig for the Haida people land claim, that settlement dates from at least 14,000 years ago, then you have that cave up in Alaska that dates to about 25,000, according to Graham Hancock, there is a site in Cali. that dates back to about 143,000 years ago, the Mastodon bones had been cut and the bone marrow extracted. The ocean was much lower before the end of the ice age so it was much easier to cross from Aus or similar to South America, following the Denisovan DNA trail, they had to go AROUND the Glaciers which is why they went south instead of going from Russia to Canada by boat, you know ice bergs etc.... and no you cant cross Glaciers with women and children...
Did my DNA. Only surprise was the amount from Scandinavia. Other than that, my DNA was an exact match to my family tree back to the 1400s.
My cousin s hubby is a proud native American. HE honors his past. I ve known him for twenty years now. He canoes and Hurst squirrels and hangs their tapestries and does it all. He goes to their local cultural events. So. Recently he did his DNA. He's 100 percent Jewish. And had no idea 😂 well. He did have fun.
We need the references to the academic papers. We have some studies in South America of migration from Australia and Melanesia.
Me too. Clovis Montana decendant.
Except my ancestors are Bering. 🤔 So that persons decendants went
10:36 “ Crawford took a dna test with Ancestry with unsatisfactory results” !! Native Americans dna is NOT identifying in these basic dna tests ! They don’t seem to have the proper analytics to confirm Native American heritage. It’s been devastating & discouraging to many who know family history & lineage. I’m contacting CRI for a proper test. Thank you so much!!!
I took the 23 & Me test and the Native American was picked up on mine at 38%.
The great sioux nation are descents of the lone woman stuck on a tree during the great flood. Later the great eagle showed up an talk to the young lady. She said her entire nation died in the great flood of terrible tragedy! The eagle left an spoke to eagle clan. He said his gonna leave them an help the young lady. When they eagle came he carry the young sioux lady in sky with his strong Tallons to dry land. The mighty eagle transformed into a great warrior chief with young sioux Indian lady to his side. Both of them will start the great sioux nation again. The tribal people who once dominated spectacular the great plains during the 1800's. Our creation stories come from the black hills of SD! Have a great fabulous wonderful day.
I do not understand why people think the various routes are mutually exclusive. They could all have happened.
One thing - among many - that puzzles me is why peoples of what is now Mexico and Central America andSouth America were builders of large structures while peoples of North America weren't, other than the Anasazi and the Pueblos. But, even those were builders of dwellings and modest scale ceremonial structures like the kivas.
There are, apparently, some indications of larger structures in the midwest and southeast US but, nothing like the Olmecs, Toltecs, Mayas, Incas and Aztecs built or used...
If you look at all ancient civilizations, they arose where the climate allowed for a longer season for crop growth. In harsher climates there were few megalithic structures built. A longer growing season supported a larger population with more time for organizing construction projects.
@saukndn56 Interesting. I've been wondering about periods of near mega construction in what is now SW USA. Chaco Canyon and Anasazi peoples for example. Was that during the Midieval Warming Period 800 to 1200 or so? Did they migrate north taking advantage of a changed climate that allowed abundance in agriculture then, when climate became drier, colder did they head back south?
I am so thankful this was done. Oral history of our family was First Nation relations. A paper trail led me to the Blackfoot tribe but beyond that no other resource. I finally took my test and 5 generations back there it was. 💗
What are you doing for us natives or is it a claim game for you to wear an image like every other fetishizing american?
My Husband Is A Crawford And This Was Super Interesting To Watch 🙏🏽❤️
Our sea faring ancestors date back much , much further than our scientists will admit. How many people walk across the US? Much easier than the Siberian route!
Exactly.
I have 27% from Greenland that’s my Cherokee side and my Dad was 100% from Iberian peninsula
So you proved that native Americans are related to native Americans. Amazing.
They are ignoring the Sioux who arrived here by boat. Their legends state they were on their way to a place known to them as Turtle Island. When they arrived on the North American continent ancestors of the Sioux believed they had arrived on Turtle Island and made this continent as their home. There were multiple waves of immigration to North America. It is interesting to hear about another from Siberia.
The MOR chronicles indicate the building of megalithic temples 'macrochips' in America 13,000 years ago whilst masons from this tribe also maintained residences in Eire, Scota, SW France/Spain, Mesoamerica and Egypt.
Wow, that was fascinating, THANKYOU.
Migration theories are far more complicated as current research is finding and the ancestral groups range...albeit with some minor and some more significant contributions... from Mongolia to aboriginal Australians..to vikings to Phoenicians to africans to Chinese and possible even Japanese...there are published theories that go further...and there are dates of possible human habitatio. That goes back tens of thousands of years...certainly more than 30 thousand years
I've read that Phoenician DNA has been found in Eastern Cherokee.
Crossing from Siberia to Alaska doesn't require glaciation to lower sea levels--St. Herman of Alaska led a band of Orthodox monks from Siberia to Alaska in the 1790s using ice to walk between islands.
To me this was absolutely beautiful ❤
This is very cool👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼🌺
TELL THEM THE TRUTH!!!
Yes, there were people in America over 150 thousand years ago so...
CRI doesn't go that much detail, they don't tell you the names of the samples, if anything they got that off of Gedmatch. If you have a DNA file on Gedmatch, go to the free tools and run the archaic match. I got hits on Clovis, Montana, Kennewick Man, Inuit Greenland, and several Siberian, and all the other ones mentioned in the video I have about 2% Native American, I'm mostly European, and I bet actual native Americans will have stronger hits. Also, stop pushing the Solutrean theory, it's been debunked through DNA testing, cultural convergence can easily explain similar tool design. It's stone, and stone can only be worked in only a couple of different ways, because physics lol.
Hey I’m interested in getting this testing for my parents anniversary gift.. where could I purchase this test and is Gedmatch a 3rd party service? Thanks
When I was in 6-7 grade I studied about my distance cousin who crossed Bearing ice bridge to America , I thought it was legendary , but some years ago I spoke to a gentlemen’s from Dominican Republic’s mom has a minuscule bliss’s trace from Viet Bam .
the landbridge was debunked 50 years ago..why its still being taught is a bigger mystery to me than this
The land bridge idea isn't supported because apparently nobody was living up that high back then. But lots of groups did have boats.
Also, consider the logistics of crossing a land bridge and entering into a vast frozen landscape. No vegetation, perhaps some animals to hunt. It would have been a bleak landscape vs what existed along the coast line.
Thank you