Over the past decade, I have observed over 20 preachers/teachers abandon their faith and embrace atheism after studying Full Preterism. Could you create a video exploring why Full Preterism often leads to Isreal Only, Universalism, and atheism?
@randellpernell When you realize Jesus was only for his generation, then you realize God didn't have a plan for us. If God worked all those miracles in the past, why would he prevent us from seeing miracles? Religions are manmade and holy books are all lies.
why is any one particular person's version of history believed, when you can apply the same logic about jesus to the sources you choose trust? seems motivated. imagine you, a guy with a small channel, not believed in having existed by people later in time, because no one could attest to you. it's not evidence for, but you deviate from that warrant in your source trusting choices.
How can’t the One who is saying or writing!? I’m ALIVE, at least SHOUT OUT LOUD to All Humankind here on earth and PROVE He exists😅My believer family will say No he can’t show or talk to us NOW, BUT didn’t this One did show up and talk to human in the past😅according to their book!?
@@jeff4truth YT might delete my comment so I'll keep it short. The Bible says the day is coming when you'll have to tap your 'right hand' or scan your forehead to buy or sell.
Please explain how such a thing would actually be of benefit to anyone? Who is paying? To what end? Why is this shadowy conspiracy more likely to you than the simple fact of people following evidence where it leads, as they explain and demonstrate? All the serious money is in religion - *that's* where the suckers are, and that's why they all love passing money through collection plates.
This guy is the correct debate opponent for Brat Ehrman, since almost every other serious and educated academic and Biblical scholar treats him with disdain and contempt.
Please point me to these "almost every other" scholar you think is so contemptuous of Dr. Ehrman. He's well-respected in scholarly circles, though he is quite the bogeyman for _theist_ "scholars", people whose religious beliefs tend to obscure their academic efforts. I wonder how many supposedly disdained scholars have been the recipient of the J. W. Pope "Spirit of Inquiry" Teaching Award, the UNC Undergraduate Student Teaching Award, the Phillip and Ruth Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement, and the Bowman and Gordon Gray Award for excellence in teaching. A peer, Daniel B. Wallace, professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, as well as founder and executive director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, seems to think well of Bart, describing him as "one of the most brilliant and creative textual critics I have ever known." Granted, he also feels Dr. E has somewhat overstated his case occasionally, and there are others who see Ehrman's high confidence in his conclusions as a little gauche, but that hardly qualifies as "disdain and contempt." For someone so disliked by other scholars, they don't seem to mind using and citing his work _The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings_ in the classrooms of many colleges and universities. He's cited and discussed as part of the course material in _Come Let Us Reason: New Essays in Christian Apologetics_ (edited by Paul Copan, William Lane Craig), as well as the syllabus favorite _Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus (4 Vols)_ edited by Tom Holmén, Stanley E. Porter. That aforementioned introduction to the New Testament book has been the most widely used textbook of the subject in colleges and universities for over two decades. He has recorded ten lecture courses for The Great Courses (The Teaching Company). More than two million copies of his books and courses have been sold, and his books have been translated into dozens of languages. His work has been featured in the New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Washington Post and other print media. He has appeared on NBC’s Dateline, CNN, The History Channel, National Geographic, the Discovery Channel, the BBC, major NPR shows, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, the Colbert Report, and other top media outlets. But sure... people don't like him and his work isn't valid, okay. /s Maybe the reason you think that negligible disdain is so widespread as to be the position of "almost ever other" scholar is due less to the prominence of that opinion, and more to the narrowness of your own academic exposure to diverse opinion. It would be good to step out of your echo chamber of apologists to hear _actual_ general opinions.
![[TH] RNT vs SPG - VCT Ascension Pacific - Day 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RUTkf8Detj8/mqdefault.jpg)
Great work! I subscribed.
A crackhead's guide to historicity.
😆😆😆
Disprove it.
@@x00p3shroud of turin little darling
@@TII331 The 14th century confessed fraud? What about it, sweetie?
nice skyrim music at the beginning of the bart clip
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Bro although i disagree with u, i showed my atheist friend your content and he loves your stuff! Hahaha 😂 anyways man, cheers 🌠🙏
Over the past decade, I have observed over 20 preachers/teachers abandon their faith and embrace atheism after studying Full Preterism. Could you create a video exploring why Full Preterism often leads to Isreal Only, Universalism, and atheism?
@randellpernell When you realize Jesus was only for his generation, then you realize God didn't have a plan for us. If God worked all those miracles in the past, why would he prevent us from seeing miracles? Religions are manmade and holy books are all lies.
why is any one particular person's version of history believed, when you can apply the same logic about jesus to the sources you choose trust? seems motivated.
imagine you, a guy with a small channel, not believed in having existed by people later in time, because no one could attest to you.
it's not evidence for, but you deviate from that warrant in your source trusting choices.
so u are saying jesus is not real?
Jesus is real but there is no evidence of Bart Ehrman ever existing.
Bingo! Jack!
@@tealx8462 my name is Ronnie by the way
@@tealx8462 i am not here to argue with u just courious
@@irontaylor9992 Correct. Jesus is not real.
How can’t the One who is saying or writing!? I’m ALIVE, at least SHOUT OUT LOUD to All Humankind here on earth and PROVE He exists😅My believer family will say No he can’t show or talk to us NOW, BUT didn’t this One did show up and talk to human in the past😅according to their book!?
😂😂😂
The Bible predicts things that are still future so to disprove the Bible you'll have to prevent those predictions from happening.
@@awaitingthetrumpetcall4529 Matt 16:27-28 is not future. Jesus promised he would return to judge everyone according to their works BEFORE THEY DIED.
@@jeff4truth YT might delete my comment so I'll keep it short. The Bible says the day is coming when you'll have to tap your 'right hand' or scan your forehead to buy or sell.
@@awaitingthetrumpetcall4529 If YT deletes this comment, it'll be for the downvotes due to its insipid ignorance.
It almost seems like a lot of these non-Christian Biblical scholars have been bought off. A good gig if you can get it.
@@extemporaneous4545 the Christian Bible scholars are bought off too
Please explain how such a thing would actually be of benefit to anyone? Who is paying? To what end? Why is this shadowy conspiracy more likely to you than the simple fact of people following evidence where it leads, as they explain and demonstrate?
All the serious money is in religion - *that's* where the suckers are, and that's why they all love passing money through collection plates.
This guy is the correct debate opponent for Brat Ehrman, since almost every other serious and educated academic and Biblical scholar treats him with disdain and contempt.
Please point me to these "almost every other" scholar you think is so contemptuous of Dr. Ehrman. He's well-respected in scholarly circles, though he is quite the bogeyman for _theist_ "scholars", people whose religious beliefs tend to obscure their academic efforts. I wonder how many supposedly disdained scholars have been the recipient of the J. W. Pope "Spirit of Inquiry" Teaching Award, the UNC Undergraduate Student Teaching Award, the Phillip and Ruth Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement, and the Bowman and Gordon Gray Award for excellence in teaching.
A peer, Daniel B. Wallace, professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, as well as founder and executive director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, seems to think well of Bart, describing him as "one of the most brilliant and creative textual critics I have ever known." Granted, he also feels Dr. E has somewhat overstated his case occasionally, and there are others who see Ehrman's high confidence in his conclusions as a little gauche, but that hardly qualifies as "disdain and contempt."
For someone so disliked by other scholars, they don't seem to mind using and citing his work _The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings_ in the classrooms of many colleges and universities. He's cited and discussed as part of the course material in _Come Let Us Reason: New Essays in Christian Apologetics_ (edited by Paul Copan, William Lane Craig), as well as the syllabus favorite _Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus (4 Vols)_ edited by Tom Holmén, Stanley E. Porter.
That aforementioned introduction to the New Testament book has been the most widely used textbook of the subject in colleges and universities for over two decades. He has recorded ten lecture courses for The Great Courses (The Teaching Company). More than two million copies of his books and courses have been sold, and his books have been translated into dozens of languages. His work has been featured in the New Yorker, Time, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Washington Post and other print media. He has appeared on NBC’s Dateline, CNN, The History Channel, National Geographic, the Discovery Channel, the BBC, major NPR shows, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, the Colbert Report, and other top media outlets.
But sure... people don't like him and his work isn't valid, okay. /s
Maybe the reason you think that negligible disdain is so widespread as to be the position of "almost ever other" scholar is due less to the prominence of that opinion, and more to the narrowness of your own academic exposure to diverse opinion. It would be good to step out of your echo chamber of apologists to hear _actual_ general opinions.