Is there any worry about having to rebalance the entire clutch with the new ( although balanced) cover on? Considering that the original clutch cover was indexed and balanced with the entire clutch but the new has not, it would seem that it could set the entire balance off.
@@danielgailis5700 That’s a great question, and one I didn’t address in the video. I agree that the clutch was balanced originally with the cover on and asked Thunder Products about that and they said they have no concerns about the balance. I doubt it’s much different than installing new flyweights, but my first reaction was the same as yours. When I talked to Brady at BDX last year, their clutch cover is the same way. Maybe it’s a bigger concern with cast parts.
@@ponycarfan I like the idea of the stronger billet cover so I am glad to hear that the balance doesn't seem to be much of an issue. I appreciate the feedback!
I’m a big fan of Thunder Products clutch stuff, I also run their gates belt
@@joshcarlson8429 When I spoke to them at Hay Days, I was impressed - they know their stuff!
Is there any worry about having to rebalance the entire clutch with the new ( although balanced) cover on? Considering that the original clutch cover was indexed and balanced with the entire clutch but the new has not, it would seem that it could set the entire balance off.
@@danielgailis5700 That’s a great question, and one I didn’t address in the video. I agree that the clutch was balanced originally with the cover on and asked Thunder Products about that and they said they have no concerns about the balance. I doubt it’s much different than installing new flyweights, but my first reaction was the same as yours. When I talked to Brady at BDX last year, their clutch cover is the same way. Maybe it’s a bigger concern with cast parts.
@@ponycarfan I like the idea of the stronger billet cover so I am glad to hear that the balance doesn't seem to be much of an issue. I appreciate the feedback!