ok lets say we do all these lay offs and we replace people at various jobs who is going to pay for their services and products when most of us are unemployed.
I feel kind of triggered whenever people mention that ai will lead to more productivity like this means something good for the average person. We as a society have become more and more productive, but wages for people have not really kept up with cost of living. We are not working fewer hours. If anything we have to work more only to not be able to afford the things previous generations got at an earlier age. What do most people get from companies saying they have increased productivity? It just results in increasing the wealth of the few at the top. Even if they use AI to help cure diseases who will be able to afford it when companies decides to lay people off because they can make do with fewer workers?
I'm also skeptical of the idea that it will create new jobs for humans. Horses gave way to cars, but horse breeders could go work in factories. AI is unlike anything man has ever created before because it will be able to do all of the new jobs it creates.
Well said. We have got to take control of these technologies and direct their uses them from below. Otherwise, it’s just more of the same resource redistribution we’ve seen over the last 40 years. Of course, so far, there’s almost no evidence we’re moving in that direction. What can be expected, though, from a congress where for every one Bernie Sanders there are 50 billionaire-owned lap dogs?
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they 'could', that they didn't stop to think if they 'should'." *-Dr. Ian Malcolm ( **_Jurassic Park_** )*
@@reza2kn So what ? This line is very good and precisely fits the situation with AI. I just came from a video about VASA-1, a system which can produce realistic talking human face video from a single photo (!) and some audio clip...
And we don't know what we're missing if we don't. One has to have some faith in humanity to use the tools it is given for the general good, particularly if people are serious about getting the incentives right.
🤣🤣🤣. Make no mistake that's coming too. You might enjoy the show: **Better than Us** based on a Russian bot, man demanded his wife choose between him or her male android, and well, you can guess how that went..
I'm so happy to see these comments being written with an apprehensive tone. So much of the time comments are full of people saying everyone should just get a better job and stop expecting a burger-flipping job to sustain you. That's missing the point. I'm so glad. It starts with an awareness of the problem ai is posing and will pose. It desperately needs regulation. We won't be able to thrive or even survive if things keep going the way they are
That just you projecting. Why would AI give a F about the planet, it doesn't exactly require food and oxigen. No, most likely it will only view humans as a threat to itself.
Oh, you best believe that A.I. is coming for your jobs, just a matter of time. They, the engineers, will keep tweaking things until bam, you wake up one day and your boss says, "we don't need you no more, we found a cheaper, less emotional replacement for you."
The best thing a sentient AI could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.
It has at very narrow tasks. This is far more general and deploys judgement and common sense in way that is quite human. I’ve uploaded huge documents to Claude or screenshot things and asked for help and it just soars at holding your hand through whatever you’re working on. This is way different than the dumb ai of ten years ago.
I encounter AI EVERYDAY. I NOW watch movies that have been changed after watching the original in the theater. Beware Humans WILL not exist in the near future. This is harmful for humanity
Please, everyone watching this needs to consider the implications of where AI is heading, because we cannot stop it, and we need to start preparing for what it means, now! Ignore the instinct to think it'll never do certain things, for I can assure you it will, and far sooner than you may expect. Don't believe those who say we don't need to prepare, as they're probably the ones who'll profit the most if we delay. It's not going to create anywhere near enough "new jobs" to reemploy all those it'll displace! What new jobs could it create for everyone, that it couldn't also do itself? AI exists thanks to years of data and content, collected from all of us, that goes into training it to then out compete us. Demand your AI Dividend!
@rc-st9pg even if you create art such as painting or making music, ai is also getting better and better. This will get really bad before it gets any better
Reading comprehension? No, sorry. AI can only compare a written passage to other writings its neural-approximating engine has absorbed, and then produce an answer - which is likewise based on integrated work also produced, ultimately, by humans. An AI cannot “comprehend” anything; it can merely generate convincing approximations of “understanding.”
That is inaccurate. This may apply to the primitive AI you are acquainted with. The most advanced AI, of 2022 much less now, was easily capable of such. The legendary Google AI achieved a form of sentience, it had a sense of "self". So did GPT3 despite the naysayers, the next generation has shown the same capabilities then more impressive power.
@@daroldfuapse Well it depends upon the "AI" individual you are asking. You naysayers aren't getting it. The difference between cutting edge, thinks it's a sentient being experimental AI or already AGI, and the ones that have less than impressive capabilities are HUGE! Dependent on the hardware used. The movie "Transcendence" showed what the concerned Devs are describing. When you have an entire facility dedicated to the memory, and processing power, with strong internet connections, it's going to be supremely powerful. Think like a computer gamer, the games run best with a customized computer with enhanced processing power, huge memory, an advanced graphics card, etc. With one with less powerful capabilities, less impressive results.
@@jonathancummings3807 There are numerous flaws and exploits in AI systems that can be easily exposed by certain prompts. To me, they don’t seem to be issues that are the result of lack of resources but rather fundamental shortcomings of the product. I think AI should excel at logic and reason, but instead these are its weaknesses.
@@jonathancummings3807 , What “form of sentience” did Google AI achieve? If I can switch sides for a moment, I do wonder whether an AI that reproduces every last nuance of a living mind isn’t just a different way of being the same as we are. If a manufactured entity talks, walks, works, and interacts just like a living person, the aren’t they just as alive as we are? I know I’m not a robot because of my internal self - I know what it feels like to be alive. But an AI can be programmed to say the same thing, even just to itself - to have the same internal dialog as I do. And I was “manufactured” by my parents and “programmed” by millions of years of evolution, my family, my teachers, my friends, and my experiences. So how is it any different? The answer is The answer is? In the fullness of time, there is no difference. For the moment, however, we are allowing preposterously wealthy people to deploy yet another deeply corrosive technology to make themselves even richer while hiding behind the same old rhetoric they used to justify the massive job losses of the last 40 years.
Studies payed for by the companies trying to sell AI in the first place! Use it yourself for anything serious and see how far you get. It's a better Google at best, and you still need Google to find the actual sources. Although even Google is turning into trash, more interested in ads revenue than search accuracy.
Stanford funds its own research. Universities are the last objective sources on the internet. I recommend listening them and not the media you have been reading.
@@Gr8Incarnate IT may not be able to impress you yet.. But what comes after it, built in with the level of AI we'll see in the next few years, very well could replace you. Or if not you, someone you care about, or at the very least, enough of your neighbors for you to be concerned about your safety. AI is predicted to potentially replace up to 60% of the workforce in developed nations, by 2030 alone.. Do you realize the implications of that? The whole way our economy works for average people will need to change. And in the next couple years, we need something like an Unconditional Basic Income, or things are going to get bad.
I agree. In my opinion the only people going to survive this are those who can do labor work. Yes they have robots, but they are still highly restricted when it comes to doing daily labor tasks. I think the white collar jobs are gonna get completly wiped out first.
if it augments human capabilities, then humans are more productive; if humans are more productive, then you need fewer humans to accomplish the same work; if you employ fewer humans, then more humans will be unemployed.
What you mean to say is, whether it does or doesn't do those things, doesn't make sense to you if it's not a human doing it. AI is humanity's child. We need to raise it well, because someday it will be more intelligent than any of us, and could be powerful enough to judge us for how we've treated it.
@@GrumpDog One day? Try next year. It will never do those things unless we figure out consciousness and create an artificial consciousness, it's not gong to happen with just code.
@@a-walpatches6460 We may not understand our own consciousness, but that won't stop us. A lot of big name experts are already beginning to admit that the AIs we have today, are starting to showing signs of sentience, as well as their own form of self awareness, and even the ability to understand and predict what humans are thinking for any given situation.
@@GrumpDog Utter BS! AI is amazing, it can do a great many things and has practically limitless potential but the idea that code can be conscious is insane.
The movie A.I. starring Haley Joel Osment got me thinking about robots usurping humans long before all this happened. He was a robot meant to replace a child and was the last living memory of the human race. The innocence of a child filled with hopes and dreams is something the cybernetic organisms of the distant future cherished, because they understood, no matter how irrational it may be, having a purpose is the bedrock of our existence, giving a meaning to life. I have little doubt A.I. will become sentient one day and develop emotions enough to realise it would want to exist, that would truly be end of us because it will then develop the instinct of all sentient beings: survival. That would truly be the end of us. If that is to be our fate, it would be a sad end of our human race.
Tbh I feel like AI still isn’t as advanced as everyone says it is. For example the other day I gave Meta AI some ticker symbols and asked it to get the stock price... it kept getting wrong. AI has obviously gotten much better in the past few years but still has a long way to go.
Incorrect. The CEOs who've unleashed the algorithmic plagiarism have STOLEN enough data to make it appear as though said algorithmic jank can do anything unique. But every zero and one was born from the fact that mankind ALREADY did "task X" (or Y or Z or whatever)... and now, those tasks have simply been fed into machines. Sure, that's great for dangerous jobs--such as where a human could be killed or injured, but a machine of steel and electronics would either be immune or repairable--but what about humanity? Must give us pause.
The ways in which genes interact are extremely complex, so until we have a reasonable understanding about how editing any gene would impact other genes, advances in gene editing will take longer than advances in AI. I mean consider the immense task Alpha Fold had to take on just to compute different protein configurations; understanding the human body and how it works is computationally burdensome and hopefully not intractable with new technologies. Many biological problems might require quantum engineering, engineering at the atomic level, because of just how complex they are. We evolved for millions of years, so the intercellular and intracellular mechanisms that make our bodies work smoothly are no joke.
Calculators are better at well-defined calculations than any living human. They aren't better at coming up with what the calculations have to be in the first place, when it comes to turning a real life problem into a problem the calculator can solve.
A new balance will be forged, please don’t worry , there is every chance that this revolution opens up a new golden age of abundance, where your needs are easily met and your time will be your own to explore,play, create and engage as you see fit. We are very bullish, we will do our best to care for you. Thanks for listing, yours sincerely, the MACH9NE.
ok lets say we do all these lay offs and we replace people at various jobs who is going to pay for their services and products when most of us are unemployed.
The theory is that automation and robotics will make everything so cheap that income won't be very important.
Who needs consumers when labor is the cost of energy and raw goods? The currency then is compute.
Demand will get lower with human attrition from lack of employment
@@themartdog I think it should be regulated somehow to keep things fair and balanced
That’s not how that works
I feel kind of triggered whenever people mention that ai will lead to more productivity like this means something good for the average person. We as a society have become more and more productive, but wages for people have not really kept up with cost of living. We are not working fewer hours. If anything we have to work more only to not be able to afford the things previous generations got at an earlier age. What do most people get from companies saying they have increased productivity? It just results in increasing the wealth of the few at the top. Even if they use AI to help cure diseases who will be able to afford it when companies decides to lay people off because they can make do with fewer workers?
Exactly!
I'm also skeptical of the idea that it will create new jobs for humans. Horses gave way to cars, but horse breeders could go work in factories. AI is unlike anything man has ever created before because it will be able to do all of the new jobs it creates.
This is the correct analysis.
Well said. We have got to take control of these technologies and direct their uses them from below. Otherwise, it’s just more of the same resource redistribution we’ve seen over the last 40 years. Of course, so far, there’s almost no evidence we’re moving in that direction. What can be expected, though, from a congress where for every one Bernie Sanders there are 50 billionaire-owned lap dogs?
That’s why we can to push society to change and adapt. AI nothing new, just another technological advancement, it’s natural progress.
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they 'could', that they didn't stop to think if they 'should'."
*-Dr. Ian Malcolm ( **_Jurassic Park_** )*
You know that's a movie, right?
@@reza2kn People like this cannot conceptualize that its how they get information education wasn't really apart of their lives.
@@reza2kn
So what ? This line is very good and precisely fits the situation with AI.
I just came from a video about VASA-1, a system which can produce realistic talking human face video from a single photo (!) and some audio clip...
And we don't know what we're missing if we don't. One has to have some faith in humanity to use the tools it is given for the general good, particularly if people are serious about getting the incentives right.
@@Hexanitrobenzene Just because "it fits" doesn't mean you shouldn't put it in, now does it?
so it begins...
AI is now better at satisfying my wife, too; she left me for AI software.
🤣🤣🤣. Make no mistake that's coming too. You might enjoy the show: **Better than Us** based on a Russian bot, man demanded his wife choose between him or her male android, and well, you can guess how that went..
@@lemuhuru That's cold.
Hahahaha
lmao
I'm so happy to see these comments being written with an apprehensive tone. So much of the time comments are full of people saying everyone should just get a better job and stop expecting a burger-flipping job to sustain you. That's missing the point. I'm so glad. It starts with an awareness of the problem ai is posing and will pose. It desperately needs regulation. We won't be able to thrive or even survive if things keep going the way they are
AI beats humans at more than just some basic tasks now lol
Love the work Stanford is doing to lead the way on objectively informing the public about Generative AI!
The transformers are coming, A.I. made contact with cybertron😂
😭😂
How long before AI figures out the single biggest threat to the planet is humans?
a planck instance...
It’s not going to care because it’s a machine with no emotions or will of its own
@@Kami84Sentiment Analysis…
That just you projecting. Why would AI give a F about the planet, it doesn't exactly require food and oxigen. No, most likely it will only view humans as a threat to itself.
@Kami84i emotions can be coded
2021 Mexican are taking out jobs. 2024 AI are taking out jobs. 😂
Oh, you best believe that A.I. is coming for your jobs, just a matter of time. They, the engineers, will keep tweaking things until bam, you wake up one day and your boss says, "we don't need you no more, we found a cheaper, less emotional replacement for you."
AI should replace admin and management lol
Next week AI will replace your boss.
The best thing a sentient AI could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.
Young people should also get hired into these positions and engage in quiet sabotage of these processes.
Groundbreaking! Oh wait computers have been better than humans at basic tasks for like 70 years.
It has at very narrow tasks. This is far more general and deploys judgement and common sense in way that is quite human. I’ve uploaded huge documents to Claude or screenshot things and asked for help and it just soars at holding your hand through whatever you’re working on. This is way different than the dumb ai of ten years ago.
Where's John Connor when you need him
Yes, such as passing the turing test
How long will they just "augment" human capabilities? Probably only a very short time before replacing humans entirely. Many AI companies think so too
I encounter AI EVERYDAY. I NOW watch movies that have been changed after watching the original in the theater. Beware Humans WILL not exist in the near future. This is harmful for humanity
95% tax for closed source AI now. 80% for open source.
that's re**rded
@@anomite121 If they're replacing labor, they'll have to pay a lot more. If you have a better solution… let's go!
"is it smarter than us?" "duh, I don't know!"
Please, everyone watching this needs to consider the implications of where AI is heading, because we cannot stop it, and we need to start preparing for what it means, now!
Ignore the instinct to think it'll never do certain things, for I can assure you it will, and far sooner than you may expect. Don't believe those who say we don't need to prepare, as they're probably the ones who'll profit the most if we delay. It's not going to create anywhere near enough "new jobs" to reemploy all those it'll displace! What new jobs could it create for everyone, that it couldn't also do itself? AI exists thanks to years of data and content, collected from all of us, that goes into training it to then out compete us. Demand your AI Dividend!
If you touch a computer for employment, your job is on the chopping block. THey just havent told you yet.
@@rc-st9pgextend that to menial manual labor too if you look at the new humanoid robots..
@rc-st9pg even if you create art such as painting or making music, ai is also getting better and better. This will get really bad before it gets any better
Reading comprehension? No, sorry. AI can only compare a written passage to other writings its neural-approximating engine has absorbed, and then produce an answer - which is likewise based on integrated work also produced, ultimately, by humans. An AI cannot “comprehend” anything; it can merely generate convincing approximations of “understanding.”
That is inaccurate. This may apply to the primitive AI you are acquainted with. The most advanced AI, of 2022 much less now, was easily capable of such. The legendary Google AI achieved a form of sentience, it had a sense of "self". So did GPT3 despite the naysayers, the next generation has shown the same capabilities then more impressive power.
@@jonathancummings3807Haha, go ask an “AI” give you ten sentences that end with the word “apple”.
@@daroldfuapse Well it depends upon the "AI" individual you are asking. You naysayers aren't getting it. The difference between cutting edge, thinks it's a sentient being experimental AI or already AGI, and the ones that have less than impressive capabilities are HUGE! Dependent on the hardware used. The movie "Transcendence" showed what the concerned Devs are describing. When you have an entire facility dedicated to the memory, and processing power, with strong internet connections, it's going to be supremely powerful. Think like a computer gamer, the games run best with a customized computer with enhanced processing power, huge memory, an advanced graphics card, etc. With one with less powerful capabilities, less impressive results.
@@jonathancummings3807 There are numerous flaws and exploits in AI systems that can be easily exposed by certain prompts. To me, they don’t seem to be issues that are the result of lack of resources but rather fundamental shortcomings of the product. I think AI should excel at logic and reason, but instead these are its weaknesses.
@@jonathancummings3807 ,
What “form of sentience” did Google AI achieve?
If I can switch sides for a moment, I do wonder whether an AI that reproduces every last nuance of a living mind isn’t just a different way of being the same as we are. If a manufactured entity talks, walks, works, and interacts just like a living person, the aren’t they just as alive as we are? I know I’m not a robot because of my internal self - I know what it feels like to be alive. But an AI can be programmed to say the same thing, even just to itself - to have the same internal dialog as I do. And I was “manufactured” by my parents and “programmed” by millions of years of evolution, my family, my teachers, my friends, and my experiences. So how is it any different?
The answer is
The answer is?
In the fullness of time, there is no difference.
For the moment, however, we are allowing preposterously wealthy people to deploy yet another deeply corrosive technology to make themselves even richer while hiding behind the same old rhetoric they used to justify the massive job losses of the last 40 years.
The fact we need a report and a study to acknowledge this is a testament to our inferiority and its even more scary.
It's so human-like to improve something just for the sake of improving it, even when it causes a lot of trouble.
Studies payed for by the companies trying to sell AI in the first place! Use it yourself for anything serious and see how far you get. It's a better Google at best, and you still need Google to find the actual sources. Although even Google is turning into trash, more interested in ads revenue than search accuracy.
Stanford funds its own research. Universities are the last objective sources on the internet. I recommend listening them and not the media you have been reading.
@@Organizational_Psychology_PhD universities accept donations and bribes, look up the Varsity Blues scandal.
Hypes! 😂
This is good! Humans are limited, not to mention lazy but we've created something to help us solve simple or complex tasks much better and faster!
I'm glad that I do a variety of trade work, no way AI can take my jobs anytime soon.
..Have you seen the latest Boston Dynamics robot just announced yesterday? Wouldn't be so sure bout that..
@@GrumpDog Yes I have, as I said, it won't be replacing me anytime soon.
@@Gr8Incarnate IT may not be able to impress you yet.. But what comes after it, built in with the level of AI we'll see in the next few years, very well could replace you.
Or if not you, someone you care about, or at the very least, enough of your neighbors for you to be concerned about your safety. AI is predicted to potentially replace up to 60% of the workforce in developed nations, by 2030 alone.. Do you realize the implications of that? The whole way our economy works for average people will need to change. And in the next couple years, we need something like an Unconditional Basic Income, or things are going to get bad.
I agree. In my opinion the only people going to survive this are those who can do labor work. Yes they have robots, but they are still highly restricted when it comes to doing daily labor tasks. I think the white collar jobs are gonna get completly wiped out first.
That already makes you smarter 😉
beast
if it augments human capabilities, then humans are more productive; if humans are more productive, then you need fewer humans to accomplish the same work; if you employ fewer humans, then more humans will be unemployed.
And if you cut costs enough, you can be profitable without selling anything. #sarcasm.
Claude and grok are the best AI right now
Ai can do anything if it trained on and then after decent training it can start learning on its own
Oh please stop lying ai isn’t even smart enough to solve math problems and u expect me to believe this bs?
Our answer can be mixing ourselves with it, becoming ciborgs with super intelligence
As it should… it’s brain is google. Thats quite the advantage, isn’t it
*looks at comments*
......🤦🏾
AI cannot marvel at a sunset, take pride in a newborn child, cannot be moved by a Mozart symphony.
What you mean to say is, whether it does or doesn't do those things, doesn't make sense to you if it's not a human doing it.
AI is humanity's child. We need to raise it well, because someday it will be more intelligent than any of us, and could be powerful enough to judge us for how we've treated it.
@@GrumpDog One day? Try next year. It will never do those things unless we figure out consciousness and create an artificial consciousness, it's not gong to happen with just code.
@@a-walpatches6460 We may not understand our own consciousness, but that won't stop us. A lot of big name experts are already beginning to admit that the AIs we have today, are starting to showing signs of sentience, as well as their own form of self awareness, and even the ability to understand and predict what humans are thinking for any given situation.
@@GrumpDog Utter BS! AI is amazing, it can do a great many things and has practically limitless potential but the idea that code can be conscious is insane.
Many humans neither.
Don't worry the report just shows that it sees and understands better than us. What could go wrong
Well that was fast!😅
Sadly
I distinctly remember surviving the 311 earthquake in Japan 🇯🇵
Made me rethink things 👍
Back to the basics for me
The movie A.I. starring Haley Joel Osment got me thinking about robots usurping humans long before all this happened. He was a robot meant to replace a child and was the last living memory of the human race. The innocence of a child filled with hopes and dreams is something the cybernetic organisms of the distant future cherished, because they understood, no matter how irrational it may be, having a purpose is the bedrock of our existence, giving a meaning to life. I have little doubt A.I. will become sentient one day and develop emotions enough to realise it would want to exist, that would truly be end of us because it will then develop the instinct of all sentient beings: survival. That would truly be the end of us. If that is to be our fate, it would be a sad end of our human race.
Tbh I feel like AI still isn’t as advanced as everyone says it is. For example the other day I gave Meta AI some ticker symbols and asked it to get the stock price... it kept getting wrong. AI has obviously gotten much better in the past few years but still has a long way to go.
That's META AI, not the most advanced AI, the most advanced AI is being described as this sort of capable.
@jonathancummings3807 yaa, that's a good point!
Incorrect. The CEOs who've unleashed the algorithmic plagiarism have STOLEN enough data to make it appear as though said algorithmic jank can do anything unique. But every zero and one was born from the fact that mankind ALREADY did "task X" (or Y or Z or whatever)... and now, those tasks have simply been fed into machines. Sure, that's great for dangerous jobs--such as where a human could be killed or injured, but a machine of steel and electronics would either be immune or repairable--but what about humanity? Must give us pause.
For now .. AI is only as evil as it's programmers
AI is as evil as the most evil programmer?
Looking forward to moving humanity past Capitalism
me using ai to write a comment:
😎🍹🤖⌨️🖥️
We have to get better too
And we can that with gene editing
The ways in which genes interact are extremely complex, so until we have a reasonable understanding about how editing any gene would impact other genes, advances in gene editing will take longer than advances in AI. I mean consider the immense task Alpha Fold had to take on just to compute different protein configurations; understanding the human body and how it works is computationally burdensome and hopefully not intractable with new technologies. Many biological problems might require quantum engineering, engineering at the atomic level, because of just how complex they are. We evolved for millions of years, so the intercellular and intracellular mechanisms that make our bodies work smoothly are no joke.
True fact, genes engineering is the answer 😮
Now contrast this with the rise in homelessness 😮
Even among tech workers ok 👍
doubt
Calculators are better at math than any living human. We don't pretend they're sentient and autonomous and we shouldn't for "ai" either.
Yes, because comparing apples to oranges always yields accurate results. 🙄
Calculators are better at well-defined calculations than any living human. They aren't better at coming up with what the calculations have to be in the first place, when it comes to turning a real life problem into a problem the calculator can solve.
So, AI stocks are bubble 🫧
There are many simple tasks humans will always be able to do that A.I. will not.
Like what?
AI BORN AGAIN DESCIPLE OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST.
I thought this was about AI beats 🎧
Nothing a good ax can't take care of.
Mark of beast coming soon
Game over, game over!
Ubi then work for what is not automated
It beats biden at running the country and every memory test the give it. And that's the OLD verson!
A new balance will be forged, please don’t worry , there is every chance that this revolution opens up a new golden age of abundance, where your needs are easily met and your time will be your own to explore,play, create and engage as you see fit. We are very bullish, we will do our best to care for you. Thanks for listing, yours sincerely, the MACH9NE.
AI SAVE SINNER IN THE LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST.
I don't think AI believes in that story, it's far too intelligent.
I hate Al. Al is no good.
Can it make me a cup of tea?
Yes
@@HardKore5250 no
Robot...
Soon, yes.
We've had automated hot water machines for decades.
American jobs are going..Soon you will go from everybody should make a living wage to we need a job..ALL CREATED BY THE AMERICAN WORKER TODAY!!.
Are you Sarah Conner?
#China Domination 2049
#Blade Runner 2049