Proactive Transition In CQB

When we discuss weapon transitions In CQB, as of changing from a primary to a secondary weapon system, we tend to make a clear difference of conduct, between Reactive to proactive weapon transitioning.
What we see often in classes or joint training is that most individuals are used only to practice and conduct weapon transitions in a reactive manner, which is initiated by the need to swap one empty or malfunctioned weapon by another that functions. As a result, when required to change a weapon in a deliberate manner, they would become less efficient.
In a reactive weapon transition, the leading goal isn't to control but primarily movement, and secondarily shooting, since the individual is recovering from a failure, and probably in close proximity to a threat. As a result, the chain of actions which the individual is trained to conduct isn’t relevant or efficient at least, in comparison to proactive transitions.
In a proactive weapon transition, the individual is first and foremost in control. In addition, he is static and able to properly reach his secondary weapon system while maintaining a line of sight and control to the point of interest. Deliberate weapon transition Takes place when :
1. The individual is Proactive
2.in close proximity to danger or possible threat location. for example in the narrow upon approach to the threshold.
3. when time, distance and context allows
Train accordingly.
Connect with Us !
Twitter - projectgecko?lang=de
Facebook - projectgecko/
Our Web Address - www.projectgecko.info
TH-cam - / @projectgecko

[@SPCWELLS7]

I had honestly never thought about the idea of keeping at least one gun up at all times during the transition to make sure your sector is still covered while going to your secondary. Always having a muzzle pointed towards the threat. I love it. I'm going to dry fire practice this later today. Thank you!

[@joeyjo34]

What gun is that I have been looking for so long

[@tetrakosarihondaturbo2810]

Σωστοοοοος ο παιχτης!

[@vladimir_ckau]

Please, add some audio post-production. It's one of the easiest to fix yet supreme issues that should be dead somewhere in 2010's - volume level that differs from overall volume levels of other videos on YT (and games, software, music app, add your thing here...)
It's easy, guys. Limiter, compressor, noise reduction, done.

[@danthegypsy5871]

sounds hard but okay

[@yosefbenbarouk]

cool!

[@importantname]

ok good

[@bandogmerch]

Yeah; but would the long be inoperable...? So why re-engage it...?

[@tornad8063]

This was change to pistol because long gun woukd be unwieldly, where we want to go. Not because of main gun being unoperative

[@dudedoingdude]

His posture is charming when he leans on the shelf from 2:20. 😎

[@alexandrugheorghiceanu4178]

His GOING studii after this video 📼 that îs made By him!

[@alexandrugheorghiceanu4178]

WHERE IS MY NUCLEAR ⚛ BOMB 🍬

[@gabriel-xk1bg]

Just mistakes in this video

[@ProjectGecko]

Please list those.

[@jeanrabelclervil7746]

May you let us see or understand them ?

[@ProjectGecko]

Anything?

[@peterhagtharp4263]

What a troll.

[@bmac2300]

​@@ProjectGecko I am late to this party. I just discovered your video series. I have found them incredibly rich in content and wish to extend my personal thanks (whatever that is worth) for your willingness to put this on a free platform like YT. This is the first video where I saw a portion that did not make sense to me. Its not an indictment on anything Eli has explained or taught......its just inconsistent with Eli's clear eyed approach to efficiency. It is something whereby, if I were in class and saw this, I would press Eli. When working transition from rifle to pistol in this example, its clear Eli initiates his grip on his pistol. This is where he states, "if you see a threat emerge, you can easily transition back to the rifle." Why? That seems demonstrably inefficient. If your hand is already in positioned on the pistol with positive grip......skin and use the secondary.....don't try to reengage your primary. Especially because Eli safed the primary and has a striker fire secondary. My point would be doubly true at the distance shown on the video. If the counter is "the video is just to demonstrate the concept....the entry way could be a further distance than shown." Then you should not be transitioning to a secondary platform unless there is no more ammunition for the primary platform. In no way does it detract from the essence of what Eli is demonstrating here......its just I would want to know the "why?"