Interesting talk. One thing I noticed, I think the speaker was mixing up “a ton” with a thousand pounds. A ton is 2000lbs. “So we have elk. They can reach over a ton in weight” We certainly don’t have elk that are over 2000lbs.
No sir he's not. A buddy of mine in 1997 killed an 8x8 that weighed 1873 lb. They say the world record is only like 1,200 lb but that's not true at all. I know a bunch of people that's killed elk bigger than 1200 lb. Moose or even bigger than that. He said that brown bear only get about 750 lb. That's garbage. The biggest Kodiak ever killed which is a brown bear, it was killed on Kodiak Island off the coast of Alaska and it was 14 ft tall and weighed 1273 lb. It's front paws 15 and 1/4 in wide. They said polar bears only get about 14 ft tall. That's not true either. There are replicas of some of the biggest polar bears ever killed in the San Diego zoo and they're about 18 ft tall. Honestly don't think people realize how big a bear gets. But I do know one thing if someone that's been a hunter since I was a child growing up in the mountains of Southern West Virginia is this, you can look at what Field and stream magazine or Cabela's or whatever hunting magazine you want to look at or website and their statistics are never right on height and weights of animals. They're pretty good on fish, but not when it comes to Bear elk moose whitetail etc.
I feel stupider after watching this video. Seriously, the ark story is the dumbest story in the whole Bible. The Australian aborigine has been living in Australia for 60,000 years. You'd think they'd of drowned if the whole world was covered in water.
Would you appreciate secular scientists instead of Christian psychologists. These “scientists “ are in the very small minority. If they weren’t linked to religion I guarantee you wouldn’t believe
14:15 Points out that lamas and camels have the same basic tooth structure as goats, deer, and cows. I immediately said, "Well they are all artiodactyls, and related to each other, so that is expected...." and he follows with "but we don't think they are related to each other." Excuse me? Why not? Hello? Same basic body plan, same basic tooth plan (cameloids retain their canine teeth where the others didn't, that's why they are cameloids and not one of the other groups.). What gives here? Picking the evidence you like and ignoring everything you don't is pretty par for the course with creationists, but why would he even mention this if he's just going to pretend it doesn't exist?
Very typical thing that creationists do is cherry pick… he also mentions how they’re all the same “kind” and they all could’ve diversified after the flood but never mentions that these hybrids are always infertile so they can’t diversify the way they claim
@@absolutelyfookinnobody2843 Don't. Do your own research. All the questions this guy proposes are good questions for students of the topic to have (well most of them, the first isn't very good). I'm disappointed that instead of looking for answers, he pretends there are none, or that they are inadequate.
It's amazing to me when 6 day creationists say "Even with millions of years there's not enough time for evolution to occur" but then claim there was extensive speciation (*cough* evolution *cough*) in just the past 6000 years after the flood (actually the dude says it happened in 600!)
"Evolution" has shown that the species that others came from eventually become extinct. If "Evolution" is the case that man desended from apes then why aren't apes extinct?
31:27 "How did tiny, tree-dwelling animals get so far away from where the ark landed? Well, the ones we see as fossils are not small, slow or tree-dwelling. They're giant ground sloths. So, these animals were much bigger!" Then why does the Creation Museum's ark show the tiny sloths instead of the giant ground sloths? (Probably because it would throw off the ark's storage capacity.)
@@Trumpstinks image being some early human, just so your ancestors deny your existence and blame theirs on two people, a cursed apple and a talking snake💀💀💀
@@TheGuyWhoAsked1 Or you could just ignore all evidence presented, and believe that "millions and millions" of years ago nothing exploded then it turned into a primordial soup that turned into a frog then over "millions and millions" of years into a prince. Darwin's fairy tales.
"I live in Michigan. And about three years ago they found a wooly mammoth skeleton in Chelsea Michigan" Lucky you, Because Australia or Nigeria will never find one.
@Hermie i dont think a comma would fit between michigan (and) about. They both conveycompletethoughts. Also stop being a dipshit, they probadly mesed up. There sentemce.
Really successful people know the bible and study the word of our father this takes dedication and love for God's truth 🙏 ❤ may everyone receive the Holy spirit and live by the word of God amen
Wait, there have been at least five ice ages. Also, there are several things that can contribute to the start of an ice age: Milankovitch Cycles - Precession (A slow wobble in the motion of the Earths axis), Obliquity (A shift in the tilt of the axis), Eccentricity (how round or eccentric the orbit is) Atmospheric composition - A change in the level of greenhouse gasses (carbon dioxide, methane) trapping atmospheric heat Tectonic shift - A change in the relative location of major land masses changing the ocean currents and warming the poles Volcanism - Volcanic dust in the atmosphere blocking out the sun A worldwide flood would require a change in the amount of water on the planet over a short period of time and then (presumably) the removal of that water a little later. Your not really talking about the glaciation or deglaciation of the planet, but about adding 14,000 feet of water in a couple of days over the entire surface of the planet then somehow losing it again. This is crazy. I've never seen anyone try so hard to prove the existence of supernatural things.
If this body of water is already under sea level, then it can not contribute to making the sea level rise. This is just more irrational nonsense. @@brycevanderhart2461
May I also add on: My Mom taught me to have a backbone, not to be afraid, and to stand up to the evolutionists! We need to teach our kids to stand up to their peers and Teachers/Professors, with creation science refuting evolution! Thank you for providing us with that science!
In 1978, I discovered the largest mass grave of Colombian Mammoths that died of the same event.24 confirmed, with evidence of others uncovered during construction of the dig shelter. It is now known as the Waco mammoth National Monument.
Awesome, and congrats! Nice achievement. I took my daughter on a road trip last year and we were going to stop at a mammoth grave site in south Dakota (or north. I don't remember) but they were closed. Would have been cool.
This has been interesting. But the one question I have is: if you believe the Bible is history, and that history was told to Moses by God, AND you believe it. Then, why don’t you believe God, when he says the earth is flat and stationary? 🤔
We both know why they only take their literal interpretation so far when it comes to accepting the Word of God. They covet their standing in the world.
We are all sad, Hubris most often brings us all down. But they have the faith to believe in a young Earth, through the Son of Man. I doubt the shape holds salvation. But for many, it opens their hearts. These men and women's hearts are already open. He reveals to each of us that which we need when we need it. They are steal teaching us or we wouldn't be watching.
@@JCSJesusChristSaves I wasn’t hear to learn, I already knew what he was explaining. No one said the shape has anything to do with salvation, but neither does anything in the is video. The video was to demonstrate truth over lies. As was my statement 👍🙂🐻
While I disagree with your conclusions, I find there are a lot of good scientific facts here in your explanation about diversification of animals over time.
If you want to include genetics as evidence for your side, you can't cherry pick what genetics tells you and ignore the concrete genetic evidence against a statement like 'all bears have 2 common ancestors'
Nicely presented, I'm just wondering if you really don't see the hole in your own argument about the ice ages. The changing tilt of the earth does not cause the earth to cool down as a whole, the same amount of sunlight reaches us as any time. It is, however more focused on the equators, which causes warm equatorial oceans and colder poles. As you said yourself, this produces lots of moisture in the air, which will fall on the colder parts of the earth. No great flood required. The time of the biblical great flood does coincide with a giant meteor impact in the indian ocean, which has left a huge crater at the bottom of that quite deep ocean. This did cause massive flooding in pretty much all of Africa and the whole inhabited world of the time, including a tsunami that has left 200m high 'chevrons' of dirt on madagascar. It would also have reached the americas. Several cubic kilometers of ocean just suddenly evaporating would cause some issues with massive rainfall throughout the world, which is the most likely reason that most civilizations have a flooding event in their mystical past. I'm not saying some angry god didn't hurl that rock at the earth, since I can't prove that, but I am saying that he's not necessary to explain it all. Regarding your animals and the quick diversification from a few animals... If we just look at similarities of bones, archeologists have found much older things that are a kind of cross between the groups that you mention. The thing with these species is that there are 'keyhole' events where only a few of the species survive. This may be a massive flooding, a massive drought, a direct act of god, aliens harvesting all the cute spiders and only leaving the creepy ones, or anything. The point is that if your leopard (the cats in the middle) were to go extinct because of this, suddenly your cats are now no longer 'a group', but two groups and Noah would have had to bring another set of animals. I'm also not sure if you're aware that there are many beetles that can't mate with each other anymore if they get infected by particular microbes. They can mate with others that are also infected, yet they were born as the same species/group. Your breeding argument falls apart if you look at more than the carefully selected few species that match your views, although if species can breed together they are generally related. It doesn't mean that the opposite is true though that species that can't breed with each other are therefore not related. A true global flood would also have destroyed pretty much all plant life, which Noah didn't bring on his Ark. There's also no mention of kangaroos and koalas on the Ark. Your divine flood is simply not necessary and your 'fast' diversification is in fact evolution. It is only necessary if you compress the timeline to the last few thousand years as you seem to do, while paradoxically relying on long-term geological records.
Creationists have no argument about variation within kinds, but to believe a horse came from a whale takes more faith than to believe that 8 people survived a world wide flood.
I don't want to spoil the fun but stories from the beginning of the bible are taken from more ancient beliefs of sumerian culture, where not God but the travelers from the stars created human race and make them slaves....sorry 🤷♀️
Just because different kinds of animals resemble each other and have similar traits doesn't necessarily mean they're reproductively capable. Alligators and crocodiles look very much alike on the inside and outside but they are incapable of reproducing with each other so alligators and crocodiles are not the same kind.
When humans become a space fairing species and start populating multiple planets in the galaxy and even possibly the universe, over long stretches of time, we would actually see humans evolve overtime to a point where humans from different planets over time could lose the ability to reproduce with each other. It just depends on the genetics code and what mutations have happened.
@@patrickhenry8425 try The phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary tree of life. Kinds don't work as a reference for species because of convergent evolution. And because of monotremes.
5:54 Not the same species does NOT mean not related in an evolutionary sense, yes, the mammoth is not an elephant, you can tell because the names are different. You are deliberately hiding lies in your use of language.
This video really appeals to the geek in me. I only wish someone would have set up microphone in a way that eliminated the static whenever he made an "s" sound.
Also known as the blind leading the blind. We seem to have imposed our limited ability to judge the passing of time on God. Perhaps we should stop being so arrogant and accept the fact that God has not given us all of the information for our own safety.
He is correct about the tilt and the temperature of the water. Here is the catch... if the tilt hits 45° magnet pulls flip. That means temperature drops exponentially. So water wouldn't cool at the rate the air does. There for flash freezing would occur.
Creationists will laugh themselves to death when seeing how evolutionists form their magic-based worldview ... Atheistic 'science' is indeed based on magic and miracles, all made by their own god - the Almighty Happenstance. If you believe in abiogenesis and evolution, you must believe in the Evolutionist Magic like: In the beginning, nothing exploded and created all of the matter in the known universe. This is magic without Magician and without any scientific explanation. Then magically self replicating DNA molecules, encoded with billions of base pairs with the specified / irreducibly complex genetic information were able to mindlessly create themselves out of dirt, air, heat and water while time was working against the process ... No atheist magic there ? Atheist "science" must pass the fact that Man's (or his "ancestor's") 10 vital interdependent organs and their support systems must all be working together in tandem or we die and go extinct. Which was the order for their evolution? Stomach first? Brain second? Lungs third? Or did they all randomly "evolve" together? No atheist magic required? How about the chicken or egg? Which came first? The egg? OK, just how did all of those genetic blueprints / specified DNA for that "proto" chicken (or its first "Egg Laying Ancestor") get inside that egg? Who or what put it there? No magic needed ...? Or how about ”50 million yrs old” dinosaur red blood cells, soft tissue and DNA fragments being able to last that long without biodegrading completely in 10,000 YEARS? . No magic required ...? Or how about the European Green woodpecker that has a tongue that wraps around the back of its head, over the top of its brain and through its right nostril? We realize that without that special tongue, the bird can’t eat and dies … How did that tongue "evolve" over millions of years? Nice atheist magic trick! Or the hummingbird having wings that flap at up to 100 times per second so it can hover while eating. Without those special wings it can't eat and dies. According to the mindless "mud to man" myth that hummingbird supposedly evolved over 20 million years from a Tree Swift (Common glider). Who has enough imagination to believe THAT level of atheist magic? Or how did the Bombardier Beetle manage to somehow "evolve" the explosive chemicals, inhibitor, enzymes, glands, combustion tubes, sensory communication, muscles to direct the combustion tubes and reflex nervous systems at the same time, in order to be able to perfectly control his defense system yet not blow himself up? No"magic" necessary? 😎 The slow "step by step by step" gradual (macro)evolution is nonsense! That's never scientifically proven ... There is no genetic mechanism to make it possible. "Micro evolution" occurs within the species existing DNA. "Macro evolution" instead would need qualitatively new genes, but getting them is impossible because they are already reserved in other species. One must belief in magic to believe in abiogenesis and evolution from a universal common ancestor.
It isn’t comfortable laughter, and they wonder why society is miserable a few decades later living in a materialist framework, check yourself before you wreck yourself
I’m a conservative and I find this kind of nonsense to be incredibly off-putting. This man’s characterization of the differences in seasonal climates as being insufficient to explain those differences is incredibly obtuse. This guy is a great example about why the polarization exists between the right and left.
With bible terminology as well, things change quite a bit. What we consider a horse now is probably much different than a horse then. Horses and donkeys could even have been the same species then, but that fulfilled a different role, like a warhorse vs. a packhorse
This is true, most domestic horses alive today are descended from the large work and war horses bred during the middle ages. The further back in history you go the smaller they tended to be, it's why chariots precede cavalry in ancient warfare, but later fell out of use.
No ... not at all. There is no continuum of bone evidence to support the big banged theory. Also, I sit comfortably with Tesla, regarding Gravity (or, more accurately, the lack thereof).
I love the inconsistency in these arguments. His argument - the oceans must have been warm , since the water for the snow for the ice age must have come from somewhere His belief - the entire earth flooded with a large amount of water that doesn’t exist
Seemed to me his defenses were well ordered. Plus, considering the amount of time to discuss what he did, he did not have time to go into every facet of explaining everything he could think of. I would encourage you to watch other videos concerning the issues you object to.
In response to the opening, speaking as a creationist who believes in deluvian geology, when an ice age happens, it cools ONE hemisphere. The other hemisphere becomes hotter. You HAVE warm oceans. And this is basic stuff. Everyone should know this.
Its mad isnt it? Science and techology has progressed more than anyone could have predicted. We have learnt so much about the world and all its wondrous creations. I find it hard to comprehend that people can still be religous, when you consider the volume of information/evidence and facts, that directly contradict their beliefs. Their blind 'faith' Trumps everything apparently. The amount of people that refer to the bible when they are talking about the world or its lifeforms etc is beyond all belief. The 1900 year old book that has all the answers to a world that is millions of years old. 😂😂😂
@@hookymakalele6296 it's mad isn't it, people choose to believe in the big bang which happened billions of years ago, when nobody was around to observe it. they receive that by blind faith and say its not a religion. others also believe in the scientific impossibility that nothing produced everything, when we can't even make a grain of sand from nothing. don't tell me yours is not a religion, you receive that by blind faith. at least Jesus had thousands of followers and crowds of people who witnessed His miracles. you have a book that tells you the big bang happened and you believe that completely by faith lol. the absolute irony.
@@daughterofzion1083 Oh boy... Another one that says that Atheisme is a belief, a religion. All the Atheists stand for is that we DO NOT believe in any god. You don't belive in Zeus, Apollo, Shiva Thor etc, etc. We just go 1 god further. Science has shown so much. And keeps showing us the most strange things WITH an explenation. We do not believe in a big brother that watches our every move. Checkes our every thought. and punishes us when we watch p0rn ans "spill our seed".. Your god is okay with young girls being the spoils of war. And much sicko stuf more.... Those with blind faith are not the Atheists.
It’s easy to spout nonsense when not being fact checked in real time or countered with real evidence. The cherry picking to support an already established belief rampant here. This all boils down this is true because it’s written in a book and the book also says everything in it is true.
Given how violent the model he proposed was, you would think there would be records indicating the mass amounts of volcanic activity required to reduce overall sunlight. Also, the tilt of the earth is not the only factor to determine an ice age, in fact one of the larger factors are Milankovitch cycles. These cycles can alter the amount of solar radiation received, and can help to start an ice age. Also, in regards to the counter point that ice sheets cannot form if the oceans are cold, yes they can. Given the fact that there were parts of the globe that were not frozen and were actually quite temperate, the wind currents can direct water vapor to the colder regions, thus producing snow and therefore glaciers. This is mainly since hot water vapor creates a higher pressure than the pressure over cold regions, causing the water vapor to move to the cold regions and fall as snow. But this is only one factor, wind currents and general weather can cause more and more water to deposit on the cold regions as snow.
There are records indicating vast amounts of volcanic activity they have ice cores mud cores etc. from all around the world indicating at the same time there was massive volcanic activity and ash deposits.
I forget which volcano erupted in if I remember, the 1970s, spewed ash into the stratosphere that encircled the earth. It was enough to drop the average temperature a bit for 2 years. Now if/when the Yellowstone Caldera should erupt, there would be enough ash ejected high in the atmosphere to drop the world temperature by 2°F to 5°F for possibly 10 years. Predictions indicate 10 feet or more ash in the central US, and a foot or two on the eastern seaboard. Smaller eruptions can eject ash high enough to not be visible on the ground but block some sunlight. Kind of like a screen on a window slows daytime heating. Just for interest you can test the effect by using a multimeter to measure solar panel voltage and current output. Check the voltage and current output unregulated, with no obstruction to the sun's rays. Then put a window screen over the solar panel and check output again. You will be amazed at how much the output is reduced. Just hold your hand in front 2 feet in front and see how much output drops from a 2' by 4' solar panel. Probably covering 5% at most.
@@Whistlen_Dixie That’s a nice argument, got a source? I can’t find any records of that happening and it being attributed to starting the last glacial period.
Why does everyone always get the Noah story wrong? In the book of Genesis it follows: Genesis chapter 7 [1] And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation. [2] Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female. [3] Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth. Therefore Noah took Seven pairs of clean animals and only two pairs of unclean animals. I can only imagine this being done for Genetic Diversity reasons thus making the animals stronger, more capable of surviving the harshness to come.
Tell me how you got kangaroos, America buffalo, Tasmanian devil, ant eaters on the Ark? This is nothing about aphids, fleas, ants, moths, silverfish., bacteria, bugs and all the extremely microscopic insects that are found in locations like the amazon and how they were kept in their own special environments. How did they get to their present location without leaving fossils along the way. How did they get to islands in the middle of the oceans? This is the biggest fairy tale and I cannot understand how adults could possibally believe something so silly. To have enough food and for 8 people to feed and clean up after this many animals is so far fetched ,it is easier to believe in santa Clause.
Before the Genesis Flood, there was one super continent, so animals didn't need to cross oceans to get to the Ark. As for all the parasites and insects, they were probably on the backs of every animal that came into the Ark. The Ark had the area of 3 1/2 football fields, and probably had all the insects present. No special environment needed, since before the Genesis Flood, the climate was perfect, worldwide. It sounds like a fairy tale to you because you don't know the facts, and my guess is, you'd rather ignore the facts. On the Ark, where it was cool, and dark, most of the animals, if not all of them, were probably in hibernation, so they needed very little care. Also, as long as the animals were on the Ark, God caused the animals to become docile, and easy to handle. BTW... it should be very easy for you to believe in Santa Claus, since you believe in evolution.
@@11aaf I do believe in evolution as do scientist all over the world. There are maps of the world continents at that time. There was a super continent about 350 million years ago. Odd how you mention the super continent that science has proven, but you think it was a few thousand years ago. That proves the flood did not happen on one continent, if it did there would be the same kind of fossils everywhere. There would be no reason not to find lions in North America or buffalo in Europe. Do you think a wooden boat that size could hold that many animals, also the best modern ship builders have tried to build wooden ships this size and failed. This flood myth was first written in Mesopotamia many years earlier and Noah flood story is the 4th version with different characters. If you are not afraid of the truth, research evolution. It is confirmed thru DNA. The most thoroughly studied theory in science and scientist don't question it any more. The flood myth has been disproved by every branch of science. Google reasons flood could not have happened. Science is truth.
@@11aaf There was a super continent 450 million years ago, if you believe it was during the time of the flood then there would be animal bones all over the continent that are the same. There are no kangaroo bones anywhere in that area. This flood story came from Mesopotamia many years before the Noah flood and retold many times with different characters. Evolution is the most studied and investigated theory ever. The master wooden ship builders of today tried to build a ship the size of the art and it will not hold together. Google the scientific reasons the flood story could not happen. What did the animals eat after departing the ark? all plant life was dead from being under water. Just research, science is truth.
Noah lived 600 years before the Flood happened, so he had more than enough time to build the Ark with his sons. Most probably he also had hired workers. Construction work took 75 years - more than enough to build one Ark. Noah only had to collect a pair of every kind of the 'land animals breathing through nostrils'. Estimated total amount was 6000 individuals. Herding was done by God. The continents were not yet formed, so on the Pangaia there was no need to cross seas. Food for a year would've been a rather trivial job while sea was full of edible stuff. All animals in the Ark were either small by their species or small by their young age. The sea was covered by flotsam and full of fish so there was lot of food everywhere. Little land animals are known to drift thousands of kilometers on oceans. José Salvador Alvarenga is a Salvadoran fisherman and author who was found on January 30, 2014 on the Marshall Islands after spending 14 months adrift in a fishing boat in the Pacific Ocean. He survived mainly on a diet of raw fish, turtles, small birds, sharks and rainwater.
@@jounisuninen Wow, you are an engineer, paleontologist, geologist and historian. Modern ship builders have tried to build a wooden ship this size and it will break due to the waves. The ship cannot take the stress as it rides on the peaks of the waves. How would they catch the fish with the ark being so high? what did all the herbivores eat? According to science it would have taken a hundred ships to haul the food. Then for you to suggest Pangaea existed only several thousands years ago proves you are trying to find a way to make a fairly tale true. This story originated a 1000 years before the Noah story. Research science instead of make believe. Noah never existed, all branches of science have proved this story untrue. Have you ever heard of the HEAT problem with your idea of young earth? Also the problem with methane gas would kill every creature on board. Your theory is absolute non-sense and you should be embarrassed.
bingo, like mans thoughts on the big bang theory.... all I thought was, when has man ever witnessed an exposion create anything.. it does quite the opposite... it destroys lol
That is a big statement. Thatyou in no way even attempt to back up. Ever notice how that works? A very detailed video backed up with a ton of information. And you think you have destroyed the entire thing by one very ambiguous statement containing no argument. Typical uneducated statement.
Reality, is not determined by your opinion! God was there from the beginning he oversaw everything that has ever taken place! If He says this was how it all happened, who are you to disagree. You may as well try to hold back the tides or stop the earth from orbiting the sun! One day your arrogance will be proven unfounded! Therefore, let God be God, and Everyman a liar!!!
Yup in fact that's why we have earthquakes. The plates shift under our feet and once in a while they shift in a position that causes earthquake. Or ya know, the devil did it.😄
@@mrhwi I don't think you are ready for such truth. You're too skeptical for your own good. But to be fair, ask me a specific question and I'll give a specific answer. There's a lot going on in this dialogue thread and it's not always connected. That's a fault of TH-cam stupid formatting for comments...
@@joeboudreault2226 well... since we're going to condescend, the first three words of your post I can believe.... "I dont think". And I’m certainly not too skeptical for my own good. I’m a good level of skeptical. One can have an open mind to the point of having ones brain fall out. I did ask a specific question, namely to show your work on the statement that plate techtonics haven’t always been this slow. My understanding is that recent studies & examinations indicate that they move between about 1 CM to 20 CM a year, with the average being around 2 CM. Lots of regional variation. Those recent examinations indicate that if anything, plates are moving FASTER than they did in the distant past.
Thank you for a most enlightening video . I have always believed and trusted the Holy Bible because my Heavenly Father caused it to be written down and preserved for His children . A pity I can't send this video to grandchildren who have been brainwashed into believing in evolution , because the comment "Evolutionists will hate this" will put them off.
At 19:17, why is AIG still using the Masoretic Text when referring to the ages of Arpachshad through Serug? It is well known that the Masoretic Text (and hence most English translations) omits 100 years in each of the descendants of Shem. When we look at the Septuagint, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and even the writings of Josephus, we see their proper ages. When using the Masoretic, it causes a distortion of 650 years in the Biblical timeline, and one that makes it seem as though the pyramids were built before the flood, and these kinds of assertions makes Christians look bad.
@@johnpinckney7269 hi I'm sure Lawrence will get you up to speed on your question. But incase he doesn't. In the Masoretic text there are some ages that seem to be missing 100 years from them. And the other writings (some minor discrepancies between them in places also) have the hundred years on them. And if you add the extra age to each person you get an extra 650 years of history that's kinda missing. So instead of 600 years for mankind and animals to replenish the earth, move out, create diffrent kinds of animals and all the diffrent peoples that we see in ancient cultures. You really have about 1,200-1,300 years of history. And if you add back in that extra time you can get the correct amounts of people existing at the times from then on stated in the bible. Personally I get kinda why they don't necessarily look at it. It would give people another reason to say the Bible isn't accurate and bla bla you can't trust it. But in this case where you have 3 other sources scholarly approved and studied. I say that as God sais, (paraphrased) "truth shall be known from 2, 3, or more witnesses" that we could safely add those hundred years back in. Whether it got changed accidentally or on purpose that doesn't matter because it doesn't change God's word at all on what happened and why we need Jesus!
Yes. If you go by the Masoretic text, the years of the patriarchs turn out so that Shem loses all his sons before he dies and is still living when Abraham is born. It looks like a very odd timeline. But when you go by the LXX and Josephus and I believe also the Samaritan Penatuch, adding the one hundred years to each name, then the time line looks more normal. There are then enough years to get a good number of people for the building project of the tower at Babel without a rediculous birth rate. The LXX (Septuagint=70) was the bible of the early Christians and they seem to have thought it sufficient for their needs (with the OT prophesies and all). That is why many prophesies don't read according to their OT references but seem out of sinc. In my estimation, this give credence to more abuse of the scriptures than if they matched better. But religion has the problem of becoming frozen in place when new information comes to light. Of course not all the LXX manuscripts are without their problems but the better ones are translated from an earlier Hebrew text than the Masoretic are. I think the freezing onto the King James version is one of the problems with this because it is translated from the Masoretic text and there is something deceptive about it being "Authorized" by King James. Nevertheless for the most part it is a reasonably good translation for most purposes though I find it troublesome with respect to eschatology where the word for "age" is translated "world" when it should be translated "age".
I love it, when facts are twisted. Up until the horse I have nothing to complain about. But saying, that horses evolved in 600 years is simply wrong. I mean alone the fact, that the predecessors of the horses lived 50 million years ago and he modern horse lived 1 million years ago throws this claim out of the window. Also its funny, that he described the basics of evolution while trying to avoid the word evolution. Evolution is defined as the change in the characteristics of a species over several generation. So basically out of the common ancestors developed several variations of the animals due to mutation and enviromental changes.
Yes evolution is the change in the characteristics of a species over time that has never been observed which means it is not science, it is faith because you have no proof. The missing link that demonstrates the characteristics of an ape changed over time into a human is still missing, elese there we wouldn't be looking 4 the missing link. Believe what you want, but don't force me to pay tax dollars to teach your religious beliefs in school. Science is the knowledge of things gained from observation, and replication. No one has observed or replicated a change of a rock into a living creature. You are required to just have faith it occurred. Separation of church and state should have stopped the denominations of evolution from being taught in schools long ago. Darwin even predicted we would soon find thousands of bones to prove his theory, and if we did not he said his theory should be discarded.
@@jonathanhall7903 more like natural selection. But you can only select from what is available. Natural selection is not a creative force that changes 1 species into a new 1 over time. The following is not from a creationists. "Natural selection may have a stabilizing effect, but it DOES NOT PROMOTE SPECIATION. " Daniel Brooks "a downward Slope to Greater Diversity " Science, Vol. 217.24 Sept 1982 p. 1240 It selects, it doesn't create. If you worked in quality control of a automobile factory, and you Selected cars from the factory with certain features, you will never get a space shuttle. It will allways be a car. If the cars you select from do not have wings, you will never get wings due to the fact you can only select from what's available. Cars don't have wings there4 you can't select any that do. Natural selection is biblical, it doesn't create new species it simply causes them to adapt to an inviroment by selecting the traits already found in the species. Each kind will mate and produce more of its kind but with variations. But it is still the same kind and can still mate. For example, a house cat can not mate with a lion. But a lion can mate with a leopard, who can mate with a jungle cat that can mate with a lynx that can mate with a bobcat that can mate with a house cat because they are all the same kind, not a different species. A human can not mate with any kind of ape or monkey and produce offspring because they are not the same kind, there is no link between them... hence the term the missing link.
@@dude8223 Instead of using a very imperfect analogy of a car factory, why not look at the well documented and easily understood actual evolution of wings. They have evolved independently several times, in mammals, birds and insects. It really is very well understood, there's no mystery.
A lot of this makes sense. A few things are off. The cat claws? Cheetahs are cats but their claws don't retract. The bears, the Panda isn't one. They are related to raccoons. Some things don't match but most do.
Pandas are related to racoons, but they are true bears also. Cats and dogs are also related to bears, and share a common ancestor with traits of all three, not mentioned in this video. They also left out the Okapis and Giraffes, which are related to Camels, because they have never been successful in crossbreeding them. Same goes for Tapirs and Hyraxes with Elephants. Neither did he mention that there are Damselflies and Dragonflies living side by side, but are incapable of interbreeding.
Also, how do you explain kangaroos? If someone grabbed all animals in existence and put them on a big boat that crash landed in the middle east, why are there zero kangaroo skeletons found anywhere in the middle east or anywhere between there and Australia?
I'm sure there are more things to find. But after years of studying science (and also having done Bible studies) absolutely everything that has been found only leads me to believe that evolution is real and god is a just a method of control that people came up with to explain the many things they didn't understand. And in the same way you ask me to go back and reread the bible, I ask you to go a read a real scientific text book about evolution.
I think we would have found something by now. I am not sure how two kiwi birds got to New Zealand without getting separated during the ice age. Or two ground sloths getting to Ecuador. Yet, we find all kinds of extinct prehistoric precursor fossils to these animals in their respective geographic locations.
Hate is such a strong word. "Evolutionists" may cringe at this video, they may point and laugh at this video, they may face palm at this video, they may shake their head at the grift and half truths in this video. But hate is too strong a word for something this sad. While there is so much to debunk in this video, I will just leave you with one question. A genetic bottleneck is when a species population is so low that there is little to no genetic diversity, with effects similar to inbreeding. Given the two of every "kind" scenario, every single land animal on earth would show evidence of a bottleneck event, let alone inbreeding in their genetic history, at the exact same point in time, why do we not see this?
A lot covered in this video, but lets talk about "kinds" This is how Noah was able to put all the animal on the Ark right? There were no horses, or zebras, or donkeys. They had their common ancestor. They just split into all the animals after The Flood. That leaves the ark WAY too full still. Still. When they got off the boat, they had to split into tons of animals and scatter across the world in a very short time period (flood was 2,400 years according to the bible). This leaves me with more questions than answers.
If we are a simulation, which I am increasingly persuaded that we are, then all of this finger counting going on here is ultimately just a whole lot of heathen nonsense. It makes no sense to harp on these aspects of the Noah account to disprove the basis of the account. Let's say the account went like this: _And God toldeth Noah to buildeth a boat of specificeth dimensions._ _And it was a bigeth boat._ _Then God commandedeth a bunchest of animals to calmly introduceth themselves to Noah, and then entereth the bigeth boat._ _And so-eth a bunchest of animals did calmly introduceth themselves to Noah, and then entereth the bigeth boat._ _Two-by-two, male and female, did the animals calmly introduceth themselves to Noah, and then entereth the bigeth boat._ _Then God said "I'm gon' make it rain soon. So get ready, cuz here it comes. It's gon' rain for 40 days and 40 nights. Jus' sayin..."_ _And so Noah got ready because of the commandeth of The Lord about it raining and stuffeth like that._ _And the people scoffedeth at Noah when they had heardeth of it raining. They could not believeth such a thingest._ _But sho nuff, it rainest. And the people all drownedeth to deathest._ _The Endeth_ Then you come along and claim "Ok. So lets say the animals all entered the Ark and stuff. How did they all fit? It couldn't have happened because they could not have fit!" And then, in response, the people of God say "Darn. He's right. All that stuff about God using His Power to make the animals come aboard the Ark, and making it rain and all that, must not have happened because ain't no way God could have fit them on that boat. NO WAY!!!" (sigh) Humans.
You should go to the ark encounter then you would see how big the ark really is! it’s all logical how that many animals fit on the ark with their food among other things.
Mount Ararat is 17,000 feet up in the sky. You think Noah, his family and all those creatures just hopped out of the boat and went on their merry way? No! And what about all the animal excrement! It must have really stunk. As far as the flood, yea It could have really happened. All it would take is for the Earth to slightly shift on it's axis. Oh yea, every creature that has EVER lived on planet Earth has eventually gone extinct.
You caught that too? LOL. I was honestly on the edge of my seat waiting for him to demonstrate just how a sphere (the Earth) can "All tilt away" at the same time. Thought I was about to see some magic... but dang. The guy didn't even bring a ball. I'm sure he tried at home for about 5 seconds, before throwing the ball down in frustration saying, "I'll just tell them it's what science says. They don't know any better". Creation scientists are charlatans, seeking to make money off gullible people. I don't disrespect religious people. I don't care what people believe. I have my own beliefs, but I hate people who try to take advantage of other people.
At about 10:43, AiG accepts that artificially breeding animals counts as proving relatedness as their gametes are compatible. By this metric, chimps and humans are related because their gametes are also compatible, although the breeding of such species is highly illegal, it’s also scientifically possible.
They are actually not compatible. Creationists have done their own research and found that the DNA of humans and chimps are not 98% similar. Furthermore, there has been no matching up of gametes between chimps and humans that is proven 100% true and beyond any reasonable doubt. Evolutionists would like to assume that is true but assumptions don't automatically equate to fact.
@@Scorpion-my3dv I don’t put faith in that creationist “research” as it also claimed any two humans only share 87% of DNA, which is quite obviously incorrect.
Does the natural process of evolution not testify to God himself ? Did god not create the evolutionary process ? The creator of all things that have been or ever will be, the master of the universe and ultimate scientist, is evolution just not his work ? Very interesting video. I really like seeing all sides of the lane in a respectful manner(like it should be). I'm more middle ground which may be why I see it that way. God and evolution are the same thing in my eyes. I always love seeing this topic of debate, very interesting
Wonderful presentation! As an ecologist and passionate Christian, I appreciate your clear explanations about how climate affects local vegetation and animal migration patterns. The truth makes perfect sense. Of course, if we can train elephants now as beasts of burden, why could we not have trained cureloms or cumoms? Keep up the good work.
What I find most interesting is the EVERY CULTURE ON THE EARTH has a Flood Story and all are dated around the same time🤷🏻♂️have you ever noticed how NO ONE try’s to disprove the Koran, Buddhist, etc teachings..it’s ALWAYS Christianity. These people don’t even understand “why” they are so hateful and “why” they spend their entire lives trying to disprove Biblical things. We know “why” they have evil spirits that they are unaware of that push and prod them
Well, he opened up with Junk science concerning precipitation, warm oceans and cold air. So if he's going to open this whole discussion with subterfuge, then it's a pretty good bet that the rest is going to be the same.
I live in an area prone to hurricanes caused by the very moisture and hot and cold pressure systems he is describing. Warm wet air from the oceans plus colder air from the land equals precipitation.
I am just fascinated watching this, because ~90% of what he says is universally agreed upon. Equally interesting is how he cleverly "cherry-picks" certain points and declares, "See, proof". For instance, the "tilt of the earth" versus "underwater volcano" theory. What he neglects to mention is the tilt of the earth theory actually explains a lot of what he is talking about can be explained be a the tilt theory. Why, the tilt theory does not say the entire system would cool. In fact, there would be an offset. Glaciers in the North would be offset be unusual warmth in the south and vice versa.
Sure if you took modern elephants and had them living in Canada for a few generations, they would get furrier over time. I had a friend in BC tell me that Saskatchewan horses are rather furry vs the normal very short hair sort say we have down here. Environment can cause creatures to take on some different features, to the extent their genetics have info for at least.
Science debunks darwinism. A creature has never been observed to have evolved into a completely different creature, and the fossils are also absent of any such evidence. Evolution only requires an over-active imagination, not observation. Science requires observation.
@@waywardgeologist2520 yup. And the fact that they don’t see the irony and the contradictions within their own “theories”, speaks volumes on their ability to comprehend cognitive fallacies
I don't see the problem though. Since when has science been settled? Science is about theories, debating over them and checking them out to see if they're true. It is not just a simple proces like in minecraft where you add a little wood and stone to make a pickaxe. It's quite complex in most cases, and getting it right in the absolute way is even harder. Here is an example of a theory that might be BS but that a lot of scientists believe in: Quite a few scientists believe in dark matter. We can't see it, touch it nor smell it. We do not have the tools to know if it exists. Yet they say it exists because it gives us an anwser to certain gravitational effects wich cannot be explained by currently accepted theories of gravity. For some reason they think 85% of the galaxy is made out of dark matter (Source: wiki) Now, there are two roads we can take: 1) Black matter exists and a few scientists are right 2) Black matter doesn't exist, some other scientists are right and the theories of gravity might be a little wrong. Wich one would you take?
@Soldier I am a Christian, I just hate seeing us get creamed by arguing against wrong points with fundamental misunderstandings of scientific points. we need more scientists of faith to really put things in their proper context but when I can poke holes in an argument with a middle school understanding of science that these videos do only harm and only serve to reinforce those who were never in danger of losing their faith in the first place. Unfortunately the lack of scientific literacy in videos like this serve only to make science look hokey and completely illogical when it is for the most part entirely a logical system with the fallacies being two-fold. First is that it is a human endeavor which means there is always a bias risk, secondly science is by it's very nature very much a world-based discipline which deals with physical evidence exploring all logical thought and scripture clearly shows there is a choice we have to make by taking a leap of faith to believe it and trust in the Lord which means at some point logic will fail us and faith takes over. This is what is so fascinating about apologetics, archeological evidence being discovered constantly in support of at the very least the New Testament. Literary forensics showing clear and distinct writing styles for the 4 gospels proving they are not just copied from each other. God is truth therefor arguing for his existence should be done with as much accurate truth as we can.
@@Thebuffshaman Sigh i wish people would understand that they can believe in science AND God. This video will do nothing but push people away . This man's ignorance could be the reason someone never seeks out God.
First ten seconds, he's got it wrong... Earth tilts "Suddenly", oceans slosh causing tsunamis and increased precipitation, THEN the freezing occurred. It seems that someone read off a few bullet points, ignoring the timeline and context. There's still much much more to it than that, but without proper context and setup, the rest is wasted anyway.
@@terrydesjardins3171 Believe in evolution? As in use blind faith that evolution has and is taking place? No. I study the data, I follow the evidence, wherever it may lead. Admittedly, I don't have enough to make a leap in one direction or the other. I do know the order of some things and recognize when someone is inaccurate in their interpretations of what happened and when... There is strong evidence that the deluge as described in the Book of Genesis has happened. The story is told in many accounts from all over the world by many different cultures. Plato described what is currently called the 'Richat Structure' as the lost city of Atlantis and what shows signs of a great flood dated to approximately the same period as the much contested event of flooding around the Great Sphinx. Studies of sedimentary layers all over the world indicate that global floods (and ice ages) have happened several times and the Great Flood is so far the latest. There is also strong evidence of evolution taking place, and even in the bible, the simplification of the creation of the universe, solar system, and that of Earth describes everything from just after the Big Bang (The Firmament), creation of Land, Sea, and Sky, Light and Dark, and all the Creatures great and small living on, under, and above the earth. Just stop and think about it... The Big Guy does this in 7 days... His Days... He being as infinite as the pre-biblical man could understand, a day to Him would be millions, possibly billions of years to mere mortal man. Big guy was a Designer and Mathematician, in so doing, I theorize that 'evolution' was in fact, His prototyping and redesigning all the way up to the final forms the animals shall take. Well, there are the (somewhat connected) theories that I've put together from my observations of the subject... Am I right? Although I'd love to be, I doubt that I am. I'd like to think I'm close. Honestly, I don't think anyone alive today knows. I think the Bible (In all of its iterations) have the fundamentals right, but too much could be lost in time and translation. However, it is fun to hypothesize and theorize based on what we DO know so to fill in gaps where we don't know. 🙂
I PRESUME THAT WHEN YOU SAY THE BIG GUY YOU MEAN “GOD”. HE CANNOT LIE AND HE SAID IN THE BIBLE THAT HIS CREATION DAYS WERE AN EVENING AND A MORNING, SO HE QUITE LITERALLY MEANS A24 HOUR DAY SO YOU CANNOT FIT YOUR MILLIONS OF YEARS INTO THE BIBLE.
@@bigkev982 I suppose if I took a book rewritten several times over, and translated though several languages and dialects word for word, is be right... Too many millennia, societies, and rewrites have passed since the first scribing to take it so literally.
What he explained was that with a planet that was about the same temperature all over whether hot or cold you would not get the evaporation and precipitation to produce ice or glaciers ...you need the water cycle with different temperatures...
It's pretty odd how creationism has now embraced an even faster version of evolution with magical dividing lines based on what they fabricate out of thin air. It is very strange to see a creationist depicting a basic feline cladogram. Why are cats capable of extremely rapid evolution but the ancestors of humans weren't? Humans are animals too.
Humans aren't animals. No evidence of any creature evolving into a human. Darwinism has a very long list of "proof" that have been proven to be fraudulent, or fabricated (i.e. Peking Man, Nebraska Man, Orce Man, Piltdown Man, etc.). Cats are still cats, despite the different varieties. That's not the kind of evolution the evolutionists need. They need a 'primordial goop to human kind of evolution'... which is pseudoscience.
While I am fascinated by what is revealed here, i've come across 2 problems. One, it IS possible for the oceans to warm at the same time as everything else is cooling and this is explained by the same reasoning you used: geothermal activity beneath the ocean surface(it would also explain why the temperature changed as geothermal energy is not infinite, it is powered by the sun). The gases and water vapor will block sunlight, cooling everything while the ocean remains "warm". The second? after viewing some of the other videos about dinosaurs, while there is "some" logic to it, there are a lot of leaps from one spot to another as though "don't focus on this part" . For example, the verse written, "for the wage/s of sin is/are death" does not say that death did not exist, only that sin is PAID with death or GIVEN death. As a Christian, I want to understand more, but here, your logic does not "take captive every thought" or outdo an argument as of 2 Corinthians 10:5. I for one find it fascinating that some of the depictions in ancient carvings and art happen to match Dinosaurs. There is no disputing that. The problem? That is not definitive proof. Correlation does not equal causation. As an example, what happened to the fish-like dinosaurs? While it is theoretically possible that their numbers were reduced by the blotting out of the sun by the rain / snow , what then prevented them from reproducing in the same manner as they had before once the few survivors remained? Were they unable to keep pace with the other animals hunting their eggs? Chances are, unlikely if they were able to survive for thousands of years
" A horse and a donkey can make a mule but mules are infertile. Doesn’t that mean horses and donkeys are different species? " No, becaosue they got offspring, however all mules are a different "kind", they can not get offspring.
Well, I am not sure if you are a YEC'er or not, the problem with "kind" is that it is not defined what it is. YEC community use arbitrary definitions that suits the discussion point for the moment. Kind is not a term used within biology (I was a little sarcastic in my post of the donkey). However within the "flower kingdom" the concept of biblical kind completely de rail. There are plenty examples of where two different flowers can get a fertile offspring but this offspring can only get offspring with it's own "kind" and not with either parents. So in the biblical sense of "bring forth of their own kind", this new offspring is indeed a new "kind" by the biblical definition. But the YEC community dismiss this (by suddenly use a new definition of kind) saying that the off spring and parents are still flowers, therefore not a new kind. So the "kind" concept is completely useless, added to this is that the YEC community shield itself by saying that evolution should result in that dogs produce rabbits (which is a completely straw man). So when YEC'ers says, there is no example of a kind produce a new kind ("bring forth of their own kind") and you show them these flowers, they suddenly leave the bible and say something in line with "it is still a flower".
@@demoworks "All hybrids are infertile my theory is God made it this way as a fail-safe to prevent to many mutations" Well, reality is different from what you have been told. Lions and tigers hybridize they produce a liger. Ligers are fertile and can mate with other ligers, lions, or tigers. Heliconius butterflies, sun flowers and tuco-tucos are other examples.
I want someone to explain to me how Noah fed all the animals that have extremely specific diets without modern shipping methods. Then they can explain how all the saltwater animals including coral didn't die out from the salinity crash that would happen if that much rain occured not to mention the lack of sunlight from being under thousands of feet of water. Then explain how the predators survived when they require hundreds of pounds of meat a month to live. Then explain how Noah managed to keep alive creatures that modern man can't keep alive in captivity with our advanced artificial environment capabilities. Then explain how the trees that are older than this mythical flood survived. Sorry the flood of the bible is just a modern retelling of the flood of Gilgamesh and oral tales of the last ice age melting and flooding all the coastal regions world wide.
The best Question on this thread, so far. and since the Flood occured ~ 2390-2500 years [depends upon your source] before Christ's birth, how does this leave any time for the evolving of varieties of species? Since the Egyptian and Chinese dynasties were already extant at these dates, did they migrate back through time or something? The pyramids were built between 2630 - 2550 B.C., by the most conservative estimates. This is a pretty tight window!
God can do ANYthing He wants to! Why don't you just take that step and believe in Christ Jesus as our Savior and you can ask God Almighty anything you want to about Noah's flood. We'll have lots of time for questions, eternity......
The Great Deep in Gen 7:11 refers the the same deep from Gen 1:2 and was separated with the firmament in Gen 1:5 and is the frozen sea that the Throne of God sits on in Rev 4:6. The water for Noahs flood came from Heaven (as in; Gen 7:11 "the windows of heaven were opened"). Praise God.
The whole intro makes no sense. New York gets more snow than Antarctica, yet Antarctica is essentially a giant glacier and new York isn't. Its almost like creationists literally have to ignore basic facts just to say a thing in a book happened.
absolute nonsense. Never sure why people believing in religion try to prove that their words are real and true. If it was true you wouldn't need to prove it, only lies need substance so they can be fed to those that need to believe or don't believe.
I don't at all hate this video, I'm encouraged to see that creationists have learned of scientific method and have begun to supplement dogma with fact. It's a very good start - I know it's hard, but keep going!
Religion and Science blend about as well as oil and water. Sure you can shake and stir it all up, but it’s still just oil and water, and in this example Science is the only one that floats above the other.
I agree with you but I hope you don't throw all things said by religions away with mythology. There is a lot to learn from them. But I do agree with you on this subject.
@@daviddauterman325 Nonsense. Science and religion walk hand in hand if one studies the Bible and other ancient writings in context of time, and fully researches the various translations, recognizing that it's an assimilation of a body of historic works, many which were not included or interpreted. The problem is separating the diehard theists from the dogma of their chosen religions. I don't think evolution is the question separating science from religion. I think creation is the question. I believe in a creation by a single God but I also believe it's possible that a scalar energy field decayed into radiation and particles, creating the elements necessary for a Big Bang ... I don't believe in a meddling interfering God I believe science and reality but I also absolutely believe in a personal relationship with God and another place for our energy to recycle after death ... and that will forever remain a mystery. As will God except by faith.
religion is mans methods for worshiping the Creator hence the Universal Truths. Would you speak this way about Islamics or Hidus - they know about Universal Truths. Native Americans also know the Truths. Science is late to the game but supports Universal Truth if done honestly. Truth does not have an agenda but many performing in the field of science do, just like some using religion for their personal gain.
How do you watch this and find it fascinating? He is cherry picking convenient connections in science to superimpose them into his noahs ark story while ignoring all science that contradicts any or all of it. This video makes people less intelligent after watching
Yes he does seem to cherry-pick his evolutionary time lines where a specie can be as small as a dog then over the next 6 thousand years grow to twice the size of an elephant then back to dog size. Not one of these so-called scientists have ever tried to explain Australia’s unique wildlife and fossils, it just doesn’t conform to any of their theories!
@@kenmatthews8426 Australias megafauna is a product of the enviroment and being isolated before the land bridge. Megalania was so huge because of the prey it had like diprotodon.
@@kenmatthews8426 Also the reason that dog sized creatures is allowed to be that big is for many factors such as competition, lack of competition, or niches that had to be filled after the top predators died out.
The Bible has already been translated by the best translators alive today in Mauro Biglino and Paul Wallis. Mauro Biglino is very well known and respected for his ability to accurately translate the original Jewish Bible to the Christian Bible used by the Vatican. Paul Wallis is also well known and respected for his knowledge and understanding of scripture. His Eden book series is shining a light on how the Church has kept people in the dark about the true nature of our existence. The problem people have with Mauro's and Paul's accurate translations of the scriptures is that the scriptures have been mistranslated numerous times over the centuries and those mistranslations (probably intentional) have told a very different story from the Jewish Bible. That, along with the intentional editing and omitting of original scriptures (the Books of the Apocrypha) at the First Council of Nicaea, have given us the 'King James' version of the Bible for Western Christianity. You know, the version that shows Jesus as a tall, slender, fair-skinned, long brown-haired white man. LOL. This has lead to many people, such as the ones presenting here, to perpetuate a false narrative regarding what the scriptures are actually telling us. The King James Version is the absolute worst version to use when trying to understand what these stories were about. The Old Testament is not a story about God, it is a story about Extraterrestrial intervention in the 'evolution' of human beings. I've always had a difficult time understanding why people believe in a God for which there is zero evidence and simultaneously reject the idea of Extraterrestrials for which there is a mountain of evidence of hundreds of sightings, videos, pictures and even physical evidence. I suppose it has to do with people fearing that there might not actually be a personal God who answers all our prayers.......because there isn't. Show me some evidence of Gods existence that is verifiable and I will gladly consider it, but since I've been saying that for many years now and no one has presented anything to me I must conclude that no such evidence exists. On the contrary, there is no shortage for evidence of human suffering on a global scale since the beginning of time. That's why the Old Testament is all about the cruelty of the 'Powerful Ones' not God who did heinous things to us in antiquity and are still doing heinous things to us today. Didn't you ever wonder why the 'God(s) of the Old Testament were so different from the God Jesus talked about in the New Testament? The difference is like night and day. Old Testament God(s) wanting to be worshipped and sacrificed to, and cruel beyond the pale. New Testament God no sacrificing, no worshipping, all about love. Anyway, if you have the courage to challenge your beliefs (and most of you don't) here's the link to Mauro and Paul's discussion of what the Bible actually says. th-cam.com/video/ALmXC9oGFSw/w-d-xo.html
That would explain the Sahara desert. They’ve been finding ancient rivers and buried pyramids and other structures underneath the sand that probably existed during the Ice Age when there was more water running, branching off of the Nile. As the Ice Age started to dissipate a desert started to form.
This guy is literally Biology/ Prehistory for Dummies but the stuff he can’t prove in 12 words or less he just points to a random page to the Bible instead of actually looking into stuff and seeing actual scientific causes and reasons that anything happens. Ie: crossbreeding of species is something that is related to chromosomes, DNA and genomes, test this dude just points at some quote of the Bible, which funnily enough also disprove this because of evolution, saying God created beasts to be ‘according to their own minds’ yet these why hybrids often have defects and cannot further reproduce, showing how flawed just one part of his argument is, and how many things he leaves out to try to prove that the Bible is all right and stuff
Of course he doesn't properly address the time bit which will negate this fairy tale. He said, it took approx 600 years for animals from the ark to branch into kinds we see today, and that the ice age helped disperse them across the earth following the flood. With Egypt being in a famine as described in Joseph's story, it means the Sahara desert was already formed and the earth had stabilized so, that the ice age was over. This would imply that the whole ice age period took 400 years or less? Just by assessing glacial formation, unless the earth dropped at least 50deg C instantly, it takes thousands of years to form glaciers and commensurate time for the glaciers to recede. Attempting to fit this whole tumultuous geological activity into 400-600 years just to make the narrative fit says a lot about the credibility of this presentation. As well, ocean based geological activity that 'started' the flood, would mean worldwide undersea earthquakes enough to raise ocean temperature by at least 5 deg for the rain. The part glossed over is the mega tsunamis that would arise from undersea earthquakes. No wooden ship let alone this ark would be able to withstand +100m waves coming from all directions. Lastly, as expected, he ignores which mammal was carried into the ark, that branched out into whales, dolphins and orcas 😂 again within 600 years.
Agree this video is incongruent with my observation of His creation. Time and sequence of adaptation of created animals needs to be explained otherwise it is misrepresentation of Genesis creation.
The reason secular scientists think it took so long for the ice sheets to form is because they aren't considering the possibility of warm oceans. Warm oceans would mean much more precipitation, so it wouldn't take as long for the ice to build up. There have been computer models demonstrating this possibility. Warm oceans from volcanic activity combined with cool air from all the ash and debris filtering out sunlight results in ice sheets exactly where we know they existed in a relatively short amount of time. It is quite likely there were tsunamis. The Bible mentions that the "fountains of the great deep (ocean) were broken open." However, if the ark was not constructed near shore, the tsunamis would not be likely to cause damage to the ark itself, just like people in the mountains survive tsunamis and people many miles from the coast would never even know there had been a tsunami if no one brought them word. It's weird that you'd assume the ark would be built along the coast when there is plenty of land far from shore. With a massive underwater volcanic event, the tsunamis would destroy the coast land, and the super heated water would trigger massive amounts of rain. Interestingly, the dimensions given for the ark are very stable dimensions for a large ship, so even if you think the account was made up, whoever wrote it had a good grasp on ship building. If it is true, the boat would be seaworthy for the purposes of bobbing over massive waves. Regarding marine mammals, marine animals were not taken on the ark. That seems fairly obvious, and I'm surprised it has to be said. The Bible mentions fowls, cattle, creeping things, everything that creeps on the earth, everything that moves on the ground, and everything that was on dry land. Nowhere there does it mention anything that lives exclusively in water. Marine life would be expected to survive to some degree on its own. Of course massive amounts were buried, as we see with fish fossils by the thousands, some with another fish half eaten, but enough would survive to reproduce later.
@@jessb9514 oh do tell what computer models support this seemingly impossible climate. Were they put together by someone trying to reverse engineer the results like say an answers in genesis employee or fan.
This guy’s lecture is full of flaws. He fails to mention that most hybrid animals are infertile. So much for the “kind” theory. Earth’s tilt called obliquity is only one of the three milankivich cycles which takes 41,000 years. Precession, earth’s axial wobble takes 26,000 years. Eccentricity, the shape of earth’s orbit takes 100,000 years. All those along with continental drift, ocean circulation, solar output, and volcanic activity are all factors in climate change causing ice ages and warm spells and happen over eons of time. To believe that continental glaciers 2 miles thick formed then melted in the span of a few hundred years is absurd. He also mentions nothing about radio metric and other methods of dating. Of course his evangelical audience who are totally ignorant of science will buy this baloney.
Where did the water that covered the Earth come from??? Water increases in volume when it freezes, moving from a liquid to a solid state. If "all water" plus "all ice" does not cover the Earth's continents, then "all water" plus "less water from ice" will not cover even less of the continents.
@@chrisgraham2904 Water came for the sky, and huge underwater caverns in the Earth. This water would eventually fill the oceans, lakes and rivers. The Earth in the not so distant past has very few valleys and mountains. During the Flood, and shortly after, the mountains rose, and the valleys sank, which gave us our oceans, and our high mountains like Mt. Everest. The valleys were able to sink because the water no longer filled the huge caverns. It's called, displacement.
@@11aaf LOL You really need to learn some science. At least grade 5 science. Water cannot fall from the sky as rain, unless the waters of the oceans evaporate to provide water to the sky. Where are these "Huge underwater caverns in the Earth" and by what means of hydraulic principles cause them to vacate and add to the oceans? The volume of extra water from the caverns would have to exceed the volume of the amount of water in the oceans today. What filled the voids in the caverns when the water was displaced, or was gravity suspended during this time? After the flood, where did the extra water go? Water cannot evaporate into space. That's a cute fairy tale story, but there is no evidence to support such nonsense. Who on Earth told you that "in the not so distant past, the Earth had very few valleys and mountains? Ken Ham? The surface of the Earth has been constant flux as tectonic plates move producing mountains and valleys. None more violently than during the time of the great continent of Pangea This occurred from about 200-300 million years ago (late Paleozoic Era until the very late Triassic), when our present continent, we now know as North America was contiguous with Africa, South America, and Europe. Enormous mountains, many exceeding the altitude of Mt. Everest and valleys, exceeding the depth of the Mariana trench existed during that time. You must be a follower and believer in the fallacy of a 6,000 year old Earth. Ken Ham needs to stop paying huge sums of money to discredited people with science degrees, who are willing to sell their credentials to produce pseudo science for the Creationist community. You may find some allies in the Flat Earth Society. Please do not respond. I know it's useless to provide reason to you.
Nice video, but when you started displaying all those bones and mentioning the largest animals ever to walk the Earth, I thought you would at least mention dinosaurs. Where do they exactly fit into all this?
and how did the 2 lions in ALL OF AFRICA survive when there were only 2 zebras, 2 buffalos, 2 gazelles etc etc in ALL OF AFRICA? and what did that grass eating animals eat when all the plants were dead from being underwater for 40 days? Seems like every animal would have starved to death.
@@shmobiden6860I’m wondering if there’s a difference between faith and blind belief? Speculative question, because I have no answer to the question I’ve asked.
We Denè have been here living with the moose, caribou and bears for thousands of years. They must have forgot how to quickly diversify after that first 600yrs because they still look the same as their oldest pictures and bones. And none of those animals were as giant as the dinosaur fossils we're finding here in American that seems to be missing from all recorded human records (not even on cave walls) and seemed to have died in a mass extinction that didn't involve any of the kinds of animals available during the flood.. And I believe he was mislabeling bones and mummified corpse with fossils..
There are what appear to be dinosaurs on cave walls. And there are fossilized dinosaur footprints with fossilized human footprints inside them. Indicating that both existed together and walked the same game trails. If your local wildlife has not changed in 4000 then maybe it reached the height of adaptation to that environment within it's genetic code? Maybe you need 600 years in a different environment to see what other adaptations exist within their genetics.
There are cave paintings of man with dinosaurs in S America also Native burial site that had original Hebrew... we ARE only ONE RACE... HUMAN RACE... seek and YE SHALL FIND...
@@Radrook353 if God did exist it would be female,Adam is bored to death in the garden asks God for something beautiful exciting and high maintenance and she gives him a woman now if God was a man Adam would have got a Ferrari.
I see nothing in this vid that those that accept the reality of evolution would "hate", so much as ignore as not supported by the available evidence. As soon as you take evidence, and shoehorn it to fit the scriptures in the bible, then your theories are no longer valid.
There was a global flood after the last ice age, 11, 600 years ago. The oxygen saturation in the atmosphere affects how big animals get. It was much higher in the distant past.
You must have a time machine, to know there was an ice age 11,600 yrs ago, and then a worldwide Flood after that? The higher saturation of oxygen fits biblical facts, since the plants and trees grew bigger than they do today. And there were a lot more plants before the Genesis Flood.
@@pedalandpop783 There was a massive flood according to many reputable archeological findings. It was caused by a massive Ice dump into the Atlantic. It has a scientific name that escapes me
@James Ratliff If someone didn't understand the water cycle, it might actually appear as if the dew came up out of the ground every morning. Good thing we know actually how this happens today.
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ "I don't know how the earth was formed so I look back at a 2,000 year old crusty book Oh and also you said something skydaddy don't like so yea" 🤡
For sure they did. In every generation, there are about 70 Billion possible gene expressions. That's how we get so many different elephants and dogs. but they are still elephants. they are still dogs. Fish don't become birds. Natural selection also plays a part also. Some structures are so complicated as to be mathematically impossible by chance, no matter how many billions of years. For example, how many Billions of years until a Rolex accidentally assembles itself in the ocean and washes up on shore?
I'd love to see a creationist explain the difference between micro-evolution _(which they generally accept)_ and macro-evolution _(which they reject)_ ... since it's the exact same thing, just a matter of time/degrees. I could draw a sequence of pictures that change from a fish to a bird... draw enough of them, and you'd never be able to pick out a single picture and say _"left of this is fish, right of this is bird"_ without highlighting the absurdity of labels. I also love how Christians keep trying to say _"Science says..."_ when they're in their own groups - yet, in debate, those same statements are always completely refuted by actual scientists. It's a lie... a deliberate misrepresentation... To be honest, I think these creationists just have such a "small" view of God, that they think he creates like a human craftsman. God with a small 'g'... and cannot even consider the fact that setting into progress a vast evolutionary system from just a simple set of rules requires a far more majestic God than satisfies their egos or fits within their tiny experiences. But then, they also claim to understand God and what he wants... _"Si enim comprehendis, nom est deus"_ - St. Augustine If you can understand it, then it ain't God !!!
i love how he glossed over the incest and inbreeding required to repopulate the world with just ONE family. Talk about disgusting. Nevermind that its impossible to build a stable population from just a couple of breeding pairs. But christians love their incestual relationships.
I saw a Tiger in a zoo. I did not know these Tigers were Giants. Huge gigantic animals and I am 6 foot tall. Same zoo I saw a Crocodile is about 6 feet wide and 20 plus foot long. Old Crocodile.
I've heard that reptiles will keep growing as long as they live. They probably lived a very long time before the Genesis Flood event, and were probably enormous, and we call them dinosaurs today.
@@vxenon67 And the WWII massacre I mentioned, there were hundreds that size and bigger. The American military tried to get the Japanese soldiers to surrender, because they had retreated in to the swamp.. They could hear their screams, being eaten alive..
Having read the Bible cover-to-cover, many times, starting over when I finish, over the last 40+ years, I find nothing incompatible between evolution and scripture, which is not to say evolution theory is correct, but deserves independent scrutiny. What is incompatible is taking someone else's speculation about what scripture means and giving it the same weight as the actual words in the Bible.
Sometimes I wonder if I missed my calling. All my life since age 12 I have focused on , and studied history but have learned to really enjoy videos on archaeology !
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
Interesting talk. One thing I noticed, I think the speaker was mixing up “a ton” with a thousand pounds. A ton is 2000lbs.
“So we have elk. They can reach over a ton in weight”
We certainly don’t have elk that are over 2000lbs.
Typical of someone who has no idea what he’s talking about..
Then you may have noticed he had a lot of his 'facts' confused.
2240 lbs in a ton groover
Only in the USA my friend
No sir he's not. A buddy of mine in 1997 killed an 8x8 that weighed 1873 lb.
They say the world record is only like 1,200 lb but that's not true at all. I know a bunch of people that's killed elk bigger than 1200 lb.
Moose or even bigger than that.
He said that brown bear only get about 750 lb. That's garbage. The biggest Kodiak ever killed which is a brown bear, it was killed on Kodiak Island off the coast of Alaska and it was 14 ft tall and weighed 1273 lb. It's front paws 15 and 1/4 in wide.
They said polar bears only get about 14 ft tall. That's not true either. There are replicas of some of the biggest polar bears ever killed in the San Diego zoo and they're about 18 ft tall. Honestly don't think people realize how big a bear gets. But I do know one thing if someone that's been a hunter since I was a child growing up in the mountains of Southern West Virginia is this, you can look at what Field and stream magazine or Cabela's or whatever hunting magazine you want to look at or website and their statistics are never right on height and weights of animals. They're pretty good on fish, but not when it comes to Bear elk moose whitetail etc.
I gave it a shot, but this doesn’t disprove evolution, whatsoever.
I feel stupider after watching this video. Seriously, the ark story is the dumbest story in the whole Bible. The Australian aborigine has been living in Australia for 60,000 years. You'd think they'd of drowned if the whole world was covered in water.
I greatly appreciate these Christian Scientists. I hope to visit the ARC and Creation Museum in 2024
"Christian Scientists"
An oxymoron if there ever was one. Dude, there are only scientists.
Would you appreciate secular scientists instead of Christian psychologists. These “scientists “ are in the very small minority. If they weren’t linked to religion I guarantee you wouldn’t believe
what is a Christian scientist???? For me, I cant understand how anyone can be faithful to both religion and Science.
@@hookymakalele6296 A Christian scientist is a scientist that make the evidence fit his beliefs instead of letting the evidence speak for itself. 🤭
@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 Well put there, I'll be using that one myself.
Consider it plagerised!!!
14:15 Points out that lamas and camels have the same basic tooth structure as goats, deer, and cows. I immediately said, "Well they are all artiodactyls, and related to each other, so that is expected...."
and he follows with "but we don't think they are related to each other."
Excuse me? Why not? Hello? Same basic body plan, same basic tooth plan (cameloids retain their canine teeth where the others didn't, that's why they are cameloids and not one of the other groups.). What gives here? Picking the evidence you like and ignoring everything you don't is pretty par for the course with creationists, but why would he even mention this if he's just going to pretend it doesn't exist?
Very typical thing that creationists do is cherry pick… he also mentions how they’re all the same “kind” and they all could’ve diversified after the flood but never mentions that these hybrids are always infertile so they can’t diversify the way they claim
They're AiG - they're dishonest liars. Never expect them to be consistent except with lying.
Why should we listen to you over the guy in the video?
@@absolutelyfookinnobody2843 Don't. Do your own research. All the questions this guy proposes are good questions for students of the topic to have (well most of them, the first isn't very good). I'm disappointed that instead of looking for answers, he pretends there are none, or that they are inadequate.
@@absolutelyfookinnobody2843 Because he works for Answers in Genesis and they are dishonest liars.
It's amazing to me when 6 day creationists say "Even with millions of years there's not enough time for evolution to occur" but then claim there was extensive speciation (*cough* evolution *cough*) in just the past 6000 years after the flood (actually the dude says it happened in 600!)
My counter argument to them is always, then explain how we got dogs from wolves or house cats from big cats.
@@npc2153 The counter is usually something like "There was a cat that had all the genes and just lost them, no new genetic material."
"Evolution" has shown that the species that others came from eventually become extinct. If "Evolution" is the case that man desended from apes then why aren't apes extinct?
@@keironhazlehurst3090 the species of apes that we and modern apes mutually descended from are in fact extinct.
@Ornithiopia which ape is that and how do you prove we descended from them?
Thank you for proofing evolution.
31:27 "How did tiny, tree-dwelling animals get so far away from where the ark landed? Well, the ones we see as fossils are not small, slow or tree-dwelling. They're giant ground sloths. So, these animals were much bigger!" Then why does the Creation Museum's ark show the tiny sloths instead of the giant ground sloths? (Probably because it would throw off the ark's storage capacity.)
"I don't want to live on this planet anymore."
- Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
Good news….It’s a suppository!
I love the evolution episode with the robots that evolve quickly but develop religion and deny they evolved. Lol
Hold on Prof. We’re lookin at Mars!😁👽
@@Trumpstinks image being some early human, just so your ancestors deny your existence and blame theirs on two people, a cursed apple and a talking snake💀💀💀
@@TheGuyWhoAsked1 Or you could just ignore all evidence presented, and believe that "millions and millions" of years ago nothing exploded then it turned into a primordial soup that turned into a frog then over "millions and millions" of years into a prince.
Darwin's fairy tales.
I live in Michigan. And about three years ago they found a wooly mammoth skeleton in Chelsea Michigan
"I live in Michigan. And about three years ago they found a wooly mammoth skeleton in Chelsea Michigan"
Lucky you, Because Australia or Nigeria will never find one.
@Hermie i dont think a comma would fit between michigan (and) about. They both conveycompletethoughts. Also stop being a dipshit, they probadly mesed up. There sentemce.
Really successful people know the bible and study the word of our father this takes dedication and love for God's truth 🙏 ❤ may everyone receive the Holy spirit and live by the word of God amen
God loves all!! Of his animals,,he and his son created them!! Wonderful, ,...........!!!!!!!! ...
What a terrible boreing world,! This would be!!! Without all the beautiful!! Animals!!!!!!, Praise God!! For them!!!!! Amen ...
@@genewortell-do7nn Including those that lived 50 million years ago.
Try reading Darwin's " origin of the species" .
Educate yourself 👍
@@tedoldham7703 My comment was a less than subtle hint that life on earth did not begin 10,000 years ago like the religionists would have you believe.
Wait, there have been at least five ice ages.
Also, there are several things that can contribute to the start of an ice age:
Milankovitch Cycles - Precession (A slow wobble in the motion of the Earths axis), Obliquity (A shift in the tilt of the axis), Eccentricity (how round or eccentric the orbit is)
Atmospheric composition - A change in the level of greenhouse gasses (carbon dioxide, methane) trapping atmospheric heat
Tectonic shift - A change in the relative location of major land masses changing the ocean currents and warming the poles
Volcanism - Volcanic dust in the atmosphere blocking out the sun
A worldwide flood would require a change in the amount of water on the planet over a short period of time and then (presumably) the removal of that water a little later. Your not really talking about the glaciation or deglaciation of the planet, but about adding 14,000 feet of water in a couple of days over the entire surface of the planet then somehow losing it again. This is crazy. I've never seen anyone try so hard to prove the existence of supernatural things.
Look up underwater oceans under the crust God never added any water
If this body of water is already under sea level, then it can not contribute to making the sea level rise. This is just more irrational nonsense. @@brycevanderhart2461
Absolutely amazing! Thank you to all who look at our history from a Judaeo Christian perspective!🤠✝️✡️
May I also add on: My Mom taught me to have a backbone, not to be afraid, and to stand up to the evolutionists! We need to teach our kids to stand up to their peers and Teachers/Professors, with creation science refuting evolution! Thank you for providing us with that science!
I’m not saying its wrong but the idea of the bones being alike can be used to point out that humans and chimps come from the same common ancestor.
Or, created by the same omniscient, all powerful God/Creator.
@@11aaf What? A common ancestor between chimps and humans directly confirmed it to be evolution.
@@lyndon4610 they don’t believe humans are animals.
In 1978, I discovered the largest mass grave of Colombian Mammoths that died of the same event.24 confirmed, with evidence of others uncovered during construction of the dig shelter. It is now known as the Waco mammoth National Monument.
Awesome, and congrats! Nice achievement. I took my daughter on a road trip last year and we were going to stop at a mammoth grave site in south Dakota (or north. I don't remember) but they were closed. Would have been cool.
This has been interesting. But the one question I have is: if you believe the Bible is history, and that history was told to Moses by God, AND you believe it. Then, why don’t you believe God, when he says the earth is flat and stationary? 🤔
We both know why they only take their literal interpretation so far when it comes to accepting the Word of God.
They covet their standing in the world.
@@JCSJesusChristSaves that’s sad 😔
We are all sad, Hubris most often brings us all down. But they have the faith to believe in a young Earth, through the Son of Man. I doubt the shape holds salvation. But for many, it opens their hearts. These men and women's hearts are already open. He reveals to each of us that which we need when we need it. They are steal teaching us or we wouldn't be watching.
@@JCSJesusChristSaves I wasn’t hear to learn, I already knew what he was explaining. No one said the shape has anything to do with salvation, but neither does anything in the is video. The video was to demonstrate truth over lies. As was my statement 👍🙂🐻
As a native of West Virginia I'm so very grateful they built the "Noah Land Theme Park" in Kentucky, we get enough ridicule already.
You deserve it.
0 hump = llama
1 hump = dromedary
2 hump = bactrian
3 hump = Humphrey
4 hump = Humpty Dumpty?
Ignore everything what doesn't fit into your theory, and feel yourself a winner. Well, that's one way to do it..
While I disagree with your conclusions, I find there are a lot of good scientific facts here in your explanation about diversification of animals over time.
I LOVE THIS COMMENT SECTION, AN EVENINGS ENTERTAINMENT IN ONE VIDEO
the entire comment section looks like someone's first AI prompt response
If you want to include genetics as evidence for your side, you can't cherry pick what genetics tells you and ignore the concrete genetic evidence against a statement like 'all bears have 2 common ancestors'
That is "All bears have two common ancestors ~5000 years ago"
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF FOUND.???
So... what does YOUR genetic evidence say?
@@joeboudreault2226 WHERE IS YOUR PROOF CHILD.
@@larrymallett2338 In actual natural sciences.
Nicely presented, I'm just wondering if you really don't see the hole in your own argument about the ice ages. The changing tilt of the earth does not cause the earth to cool down as a whole, the same amount of sunlight reaches us as any time. It is, however more focused on the equators, which causes warm equatorial oceans and colder poles. As you said yourself, this produces lots of moisture in the air, which will fall on the colder parts of the earth. No great flood required.
The time of the biblical great flood does coincide with a giant meteor impact in the indian ocean, which has left a huge crater at the bottom of that quite deep ocean. This did cause massive flooding in pretty much all of Africa and the whole inhabited world of the time, including a tsunami that has left 200m high 'chevrons' of dirt on madagascar. It would also have reached the americas. Several cubic kilometers of ocean just suddenly evaporating would cause some issues with massive rainfall throughout the world, which is the most likely reason that most civilizations have a flooding event in their mystical past.
I'm not saying some angry god didn't hurl that rock at the earth, since I can't prove that, but I am saying that he's not necessary to explain it all.
Regarding your animals and the quick diversification from a few animals... If we just look at similarities of bones, archeologists have found much older things that are a kind of cross between the groups that you mention. The thing with these species is that there are 'keyhole' events where only a few of the species survive. This may be a massive flooding, a massive drought, a direct act of god, aliens harvesting all the cute spiders and only leaving the creepy ones, or anything. The point is that if your leopard (the cats in the middle) were to go extinct because of this, suddenly your cats are now no longer 'a group', but two groups and Noah would have had to bring another set of animals. I'm also not sure if you're aware that there are many beetles that can't mate with each other anymore if they get infected by particular microbes. They can mate with others that are also infected, yet they were born as the same species/group. Your breeding argument falls apart if you look at more than the carefully selected few species that match your views, although if species can breed together they are generally related. It doesn't mean that the opposite is true though that species that can't breed with each other are therefore not related.
A true global flood would also have destroyed pretty much all plant life, which Noah didn't bring on his Ark. There's also no mention of kangaroos and koalas on the Ark. Your divine flood is simply not necessary and your 'fast' diversification is in fact evolution. It is only necessary if you compress the timeline to the last few thousand years as you seem to do, while paradoxically relying on long-term geological records.
Creationists have no argument about variation within kinds, but to believe a horse came from a whale takes more faith than to believe that 8 people survived a world wide flood.
@@MrMarkt64 well put
I don't think that's actually correct about not being able to see if the Mastodon is related just because they are extinct. We do have DNA
I don't want to spoil the fun but stories from the beginning of the bible are taken from more ancient beliefs of sumerian culture, where not God but the travelers from the stars created human race and make them slaves....sorry 🤷♀️
Just because different kinds of animals resemble each other and have similar traits doesn't necessarily mean they're reproductively capable. Alligators and crocodiles look very much alike on the inside and outside but they are incapable of reproducing with each other so alligators and crocodiles are not the same kind.
When humans become a space fairing species and start populating multiple planets in the galaxy and even possibly the universe, over long stretches of time, we would actually see humans evolve overtime to a point where humans from different planets over time could lose the ability to reproduce with each other. It just depends on the genetics code and what mutations have happened.
Tidus, where is the transitional fossil evidence of this happening on our planet?
@@patrickhenry8425 try The phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary tree of life.
Kinds don't work as a reference for species because of convergent evolution.
And because of monotremes.
5:54 Not the same species does NOT mean not related in an evolutionary sense, yes, the mammoth is not an elephant, you can tell because the names are different. You are deliberately hiding lies in your use of language.
@@patrickhenry8425 Just look at images of Skinks. These lizards show every stage of evolution from typical four legged lizards to legless lizards.
This video really appeals to the geek in me. I only wish someone would have set up microphone in a way that eliminated the static whenever he made an "s" sound.
I agree! I think it’s actually more about the way he speaks…he ends all his s and t words with a huge spray, sssss sound and I can’t stand it!
That’s the way he speaks.
It was a little annoying but thankfully didn’t take much away from the level of presentation.
Also known as the blind leading the blind.
We seem to have imposed our limited ability to judge the passing of time on God. Perhaps we should stop being so arrogant and accept the fact that God has not given us all of the information for our own safety.
He is correct about the tilt and the temperature of the water. Here is the catch... if the tilt hits 45° magnet pulls flip. That means temperature drops exponentially. So water wouldn't cool at the rate the air does. There for flash freezing would occur.
which is why we have found Mammoths standing, frozen and still with food in their stomach undigested
@@mackyd955 correct. And why we find flash frozen foxes
If the tilt goes over 45DEG do we slide off into space??🙀
@@ludicrous7044 Only if you're a flat earther.
The temperature of the earth has nothing to do with the magnetic poles.
Evolutionists will laugh themselves to death when seeing this work of fiction
Creationists will laugh themselves to death when seeing how evolutionists form their magic-based worldview ...
Atheistic 'science' is indeed based on magic and miracles, all made by their own god - the Almighty Happenstance.
If you believe in abiogenesis and evolution, you must believe in the Evolutionist Magic like:
In the beginning, nothing exploded and created all of the matter in the known universe. This is magic without Magician and without any scientific explanation.
Then magically self replicating DNA molecules, encoded with billions of base pairs with the specified / irreducibly complex genetic information were able to mindlessly create themselves out of dirt, air, heat and water while time was working against the process ... No atheist magic there ?
Atheist "science" must pass the fact that Man's (or his "ancestor's") 10 vital interdependent organs and their support systems must all be working together in tandem or we die and go extinct. Which was the order for their evolution? Stomach first? Brain second? Lungs third? Or did they all randomly "evolve" together? No atheist magic required?
How about the chicken or egg? Which came first? The egg? OK, just how did all of those genetic blueprints / specified DNA for that "proto" chicken (or its first "Egg Laying Ancestor") get inside that egg? Who or what put it there? No magic needed ...?
Or how about ”50 million yrs old” dinosaur red blood cells, soft tissue and DNA fragments being able to last that long without biodegrading completely in 10,000 YEARS? .
No magic required ...?
Or how about the European Green woodpecker that has a tongue that wraps around the back of its head, over the top of its brain and through its right nostril? We realize that without that special tongue, the bird can’t eat and dies … How did that tongue "evolve" over millions of years? Nice atheist magic trick!
Or the hummingbird having wings that flap at up to 100 times per second so it can hover while eating. Without those special wings it can't eat and dies. According to the mindless "mud to man" myth that hummingbird supposedly evolved over 20 million years from a Tree Swift (Common glider). Who has enough imagination to believe THAT level of atheist magic?
Or how did the Bombardier Beetle manage to somehow "evolve" the explosive chemicals, inhibitor, enzymes, glands, combustion tubes, sensory communication, muscles to direct the combustion tubes and reflex nervous systems at the same time, in order to be able to perfectly control his defense system yet not blow himself up? No"magic" necessary? 😎
The slow "step by step by step" gradual (macro)evolution is nonsense! That's never scientifically proven ... There is no genetic mechanism to make it possible. "Micro evolution" occurs within the species existing DNA. "Macro evolution" instead would need qualitatively new genes, but getting them is impossible because they are already reserved in other species.
One must belief in magic to believe in abiogenesis and evolution from a universal common ancestor.
It isn’t comfortable laughter, and they wonder why society is miserable a few decades later living in a materialist framework, check yourself before you wreck yourself
The mental gymnastics people go through to substantiate their believes, have always amazed me.
I’m a conservative and I find this kind of nonsense to be incredibly off-putting. This man’s characterization of the differences in seasonal climates as being insufficient to explain those differences is incredibly obtuse. This guy is a great example about why the polarization exists between the right and left.
"Before the first dinosaur was discovered".
Are you sure about that?
first "dinosaur" discovered was in 1858... the people called them dragons before that.
@@thomasjenkins1387 NOICE! Haha, thats wat i was referring to.
@@thomasjenkins1387think about what you just said. I want you to think about it, see what you did wrong and come back to me
With bible terminology as well, things change quite a bit. What we consider a horse now is probably much different than a horse then. Horses and donkeys could even have been the same species then, but that fulfilled a different role, like a warhorse vs. a packhorse
The bible differentiates between donkeys and horses for instance - JESUS rode into town on a donkey never before ridden!
This is true, most domestic horses alive today are descended from the large work and war horses bred during the middle ages. The further back in history you go the smaller they tended to be, it's why chariots precede cavalry in ancient warfare, but later fell out of use.
Yeah and donkeys somehow lost a couple of chromosomes horses have 46 donkeys 44
@@walter1383 something tells me humans weren’t around to see eohippus the ancestor of all horses
No ... not at all. There is no continuum of bone evidence to support the big banged theory. Also, I sit comfortably with Tesla, regarding Gravity (or, more accurately, the lack thereof).
I love the inconsistency in these arguments.
His argument - the oceans must have been warm , since the water for the snow for the ice age must have come from somewhere
His belief - the entire earth flooded with a large amount of water that doesn’t exist
What part of "The fountains of the deep were broken up..." and plate tectonics do you not understand??!
Seemed to me his defenses were well ordered. Plus, considering the amount of time to discuss what he did, he did not have time to go into every facet of explaining everything he could think of. I would encourage you to watch other videos concerning the issues you object to.
@@duradim1
I’m just pointing out his inconsistent logic.
But if you believe in magic, I guess you don’t need any logic…..
@@scottphilips8514 You don't know how rain or snow forms.
@@duradim1 pretty sure I have an idea
In response to the opening, speaking as a creationist who believes in deluvian geology, when an ice age happens, it cools ONE hemisphere. The other hemisphere becomes hotter. You HAVE warm oceans. And this is basic stuff. Everyone should know this.
Even with a boat load of evidence still being found people will still hold on to their prideful ways.
Its mad isnt it?
Science and techology has progressed more than anyone could have predicted. We have learnt so much about the world and all its wondrous creations.
I find it hard to comprehend that people can still be religous, when you consider the volume of information/evidence and facts, that directly contradict their beliefs. Their blind 'faith' Trumps everything apparently.
The amount of people that refer to the bible when they are talking about the world or its lifeforms etc is beyond all belief.
The 1900 year old book that has all the answers to a world that is millions of years old. 😂😂😂
@@hookymakalele6296 😢
@@hookymakalele6296 it's mad isn't it, people choose to believe in the big bang which happened billions of years ago, when nobody was around to observe it. they receive that by blind faith and say its not a religion. others also believe in the scientific impossibility that nothing produced everything, when we can't even make a grain of sand from nothing. don't tell me yours is not a religion, you receive that by blind faith. at least Jesus had thousands of followers and crowds of people who witnessed His miracles. you have a book that tells you the big bang happened and you believe that completely by faith lol. the absolute irony.
@@daughterofzion1083well the Big Bang and everything that can be proven true by science has evidence. The Bible does not. Period. End of discussion
@@daughterofzion1083 Oh boy... Another one that says that Atheisme is a belief, a religion. All the Atheists stand for is that we DO NOT believe in any god. You don't belive in Zeus, Apollo, Shiva Thor etc, etc. We just go 1 god further. Science has shown so much. And keeps showing us the most strange things WITH an explenation. We do not believe in a big brother that watches our every move. Checkes our every thought. and punishes us when we watch p0rn ans "spill our seed".. Your god is okay with young girls being the spoils of war. And much sicko stuf more.... Those with blind faith are not the Atheists.
This is one tiny step up from being a flat earther. In fact, flat earthers don’t think these con artists follow the Bible literally enough!
How do you Know?
It’s easy to spout nonsense when not being fact checked in real time or countered with real evidence. The cherry picking to support an already established belief rampant here. This all boils down this is true because it’s written in a book and the book also says everything in it is true.
Given how violent the model he proposed was, you would think there would be records indicating the mass amounts of volcanic activity required to reduce overall sunlight. Also, the tilt of the earth is not the only factor to determine an ice age, in fact one of the larger factors are Milankovitch cycles. These cycles can alter the amount of solar radiation received, and can help to start an ice age. Also, in regards to the counter point that ice sheets cannot form if the oceans are cold, yes they can. Given the fact that there were parts of the globe that were not frozen and were actually quite temperate, the wind currents can direct water vapor to the colder regions, thus producing snow and therefore glaciers. This is mainly since hot water vapor creates a higher pressure than the pressure over cold regions, causing the water vapor to move to the cold regions and fall as snow. But this is only one factor, wind currents and general weather can cause more and more water to deposit on the cold regions as snow.
There are records indicating vast amounts of volcanic activity they have ice cores mud cores etc. from all around the world indicating at the same time there was massive volcanic activity and ash deposits.
Ever heard of the year without a summer?
I forget which volcano erupted in if I remember, the 1970s, spewed ash into the stratosphere that encircled the earth. It was enough to drop the average temperature a bit for 2 years. Now if/when the Yellowstone Caldera should erupt, there would be enough ash ejected high in the atmosphere to drop the world temperature by 2°F to 5°F for possibly 10 years. Predictions indicate 10 feet or more ash in the central US, and a foot or two on the eastern seaboard.
Smaller eruptions can eject ash high enough to not be visible on the ground but block some sunlight. Kind of like a screen on a window slows daytime heating.
Just for interest you can test the effect by using a multimeter to measure solar panel voltage and current output. Check the voltage and current output unregulated, with no obstruction to the sun's rays. Then put a window screen over the solar panel and check output again. You will be amazed at how much the output is reduced. Just hold your hand in front 2 feet in front and see how much output drops from a 2' by 4' solar panel. Probably covering 5% at most.
@@Whistlen_Dixie That’s a nice argument, got a source? I can’t find any records of that happening and it being attributed to starting the last glacial period.
Why does everyone always get the Noah story wrong? In the book of Genesis it follows:
Genesis chapter 7
[1] And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.
[2] Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
[3] Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.
Therefore Noah took Seven pairs of clean animals and only two pairs of unclean animals. I can only imagine this being done for Genetic Diversity reasons thus making the animals stronger, more capable of surviving the harshness to come.
Tell me how you got kangaroos, America buffalo, Tasmanian devil, ant eaters on the Ark? This is nothing about aphids, fleas, ants, moths, silverfish., bacteria, bugs and all the extremely microscopic insects that are found in locations like the amazon and how they were kept in their own special environments. How did they get to their present location without leaving fossils along the way. How did they get to islands in the middle of the oceans? This is the biggest fairy tale and I cannot understand how adults could possibally
believe something so silly. To have enough food and for 8 people to feed and clean up after this many animals is so far fetched ,it is easier to believe in santa Clause.
Before the Genesis Flood, there was one super continent, so animals didn't need to cross oceans to get to the Ark. As for all the parasites and insects, they were probably on the backs of every animal that came into the Ark. The Ark had the area of 3 1/2 football fields, and probably had all the insects present. No special environment needed, since before the Genesis Flood, the climate was perfect, worldwide.
It sounds like a fairy tale to you because you don't know the facts, and my guess is, you'd rather ignore the facts. On the Ark, where it was cool, and dark, most of the animals, if not all of them, were probably in hibernation, so they needed very little care. Also, as long as the animals were on the Ark, God caused the animals to become docile, and easy to handle.
BTW... it should be very easy for you to believe in Santa Claus, since you believe in evolution.
@@11aaf I do believe in evolution as do scientist all over the world. There are maps of the world continents at that time. There was a super continent about 350 million years ago. Odd how you mention the super continent that science has proven, but you think it was a few thousand years ago. That proves the flood did not happen on one continent, if it did there would be the same kind of fossils everywhere. There would be no reason not to find lions in North America or buffalo in Europe. Do you think a wooden boat that size could hold that many animals, also the best modern ship builders have tried to build wooden ships this size and failed. This flood myth was first written in Mesopotamia many years earlier and Noah flood story is the 4th version with different characters. If you are not afraid of the truth, research evolution. It is confirmed thru DNA. The most thoroughly studied theory in science and scientist don't question it any more. The flood myth has been disproved by every branch of science. Google reasons flood could not have happened. Science is truth.
@@11aaf There was a super continent 450 million years ago, if you believe it was during the time of the flood then there would be animal bones all over the continent that are the same. There are no kangaroo bones anywhere in that area. This flood story came from Mesopotamia many years before the Noah flood and retold many times with different characters. Evolution is the most studied and investigated theory ever. The master wooden ship builders of today tried to build a ship the size of the art and it will not hold together. Google the scientific reasons the flood story could not happen. What did the animals eat after departing the ark? all plant life was dead from being under water. Just research, science is truth.
Noah lived 600 years before the Flood happened, so he had more than enough time to build the Ark with his sons. Most probably he also had hired workers. Construction work took 75 years - more than enough to build one Ark. Noah only had to collect a pair of every kind of the 'land animals breathing through nostrils'. Estimated total amount was 6000 individuals. Herding was done by God.
The continents were not yet formed, so on the Pangaia there was no need to cross seas. Food for a year would've been a rather trivial job while sea was full of edible stuff. All animals in the Ark were either small by their species or small by their young age. The sea was covered by flotsam and full of fish so there was lot of food everywhere. Little land animals are known to drift thousands of kilometers on oceans.
José Salvador Alvarenga is a Salvadoran fisherman and author who was found on January 30, 2014 on the Marshall Islands after spending 14 months adrift in a fishing boat in the Pacific Ocean. He survived mainly on a diet of raw fish, turtles, small birds, sharks and rainwater.
@@jounisuninen Wow, you are an engineer, paleontologist, geologist and historian. Modern ship builders have tried to build a wooden ship this size and it will break due to the waves. The ship cannot take the stress as it rides on the peaks of the waves. How would they catch the fish with the ark being so high? what did all the herbivores eat? According to science it would have taken a hundred ships to haul the food. Then for you to suggest Pangaea existed only several thousands years ago proves you are trying to find a way to make a fairly tale true. This story originated a 1000 years before the Noah story. Research science instead of make believe. Noah never existed, all branches of science have proved this story untrue. Have you ever heard of the HEAT problem with your idea of young earth? Also the problem with methane gas would kill every creature on board. Your theory is absolute non-sense and you should be embarrassed.
There seems to be a slight disconnect with reality here
Checkmate, atheist
bingo, like mans thoughts on the big bang theory.... all I thought was, when has man ever witnessed an exposion create anything.. it does quite the opposite... it destroys lol
That is a big statement. Thatyou in no way even attempt to back up. Ever notice how that works? A very detailed video backed up with a ton of information. And you think you have destroyed the entire thing by one very ambiguous statement containing no argument. Typical uneducated statement.
I agree with you
Reality, is not determined by your opinion! God was there from the beginning he oversaw everything that has ever taken place! If He says this was how it all happened, who are you to disagree. You may as well try to hold back the tides or stop the earth from orbiting the sun! One day your arrogance will be proven unfounded! Therefore, let God be God, and Everyman a liar!!!
23:28 The plates are moving around right now. It’s a slow motion event with the average movement about 2 cm a year.
Was not always that slow.
Yup in fact that's why we have earthquakes. The plates shift under our feet and once in a while they shift in a position that causes earthquake. Or ya know, the devil did it.😄
@@joeboudreault2226 show your work. How do you know this.
@@mrhwi I don't think you are ready for such truth. You're too skeptical for your own good. But to be fair, ask me a specific question and I'll give a specific answer. There's a lot going on in this dialogue thread and it's not always connected. That's a fault of TH-cam stupid formatting for comments...
@@joeboudreault2226 well... since we're going to condescend, the first three words of your post I can believe.... "I dont think".
And I’m certainly not too skeptical for my own good. I’m a good level of skeptical. One can have an open mind to the point of having ones brain fall out.
I did ask a specific question, namely to show your work on the statement that plate techtonics haven’t always been this slow.
My understanding is that recent studies & examinations indicate that they move between about 1 CM to 20 CM a year, with the average being around 2 CM. Lots of regional variation. Those recent examinations indicate that if anything, plates are moving FASTER than they did in the distant past.
Thank you for a most enlightening video .
I have always believed and trusted the Holy Bible because my Heavenly Father caused it to be written down and preserved for His children .
A pity I can't send this video to grandchildren who have been brainwashed into believing in evolution , because the comment "Evolutionists will hate this" will put them off.
At 19:17, why is AIG still using the Masoretic Text when referring to the ages of Arpachshad through Serug? It is well known that the Masoretic Text (and hence most English translations) omits 100 years in each of the descendants of Shem. When we look at the Septuagint, the Samaritan Pentateuch, and even the writings of Josephus, we see their proper ages. When using the Masoretic, it causes a distortion of 650 years in the Biblical timeline, and one that makes it seem as though the pyramids were built before the flood, and these kinds of assertions makes Christians look bad.
Lawrence, I have never heard of this, could you amplify? thanks
@@johnpinckney7269 hi I'm sure Lawrence will get you up to speed on your question. But incase he doesn't. In the Masoretic text there are some ages that seem to be missing 100 years from them. And the other writings (some minor discrepancies between them in places also) have the hundred years on them. And if you add the extra age to each person you get an extra 650 years of history that's kinda missing. So instead of 600 years for mankind and animals to replenish the earth, move out, create diffrent kinds of animals and all the diffrent peoples that we see in ancient cultures. You really have about 1,200-1,300 years of history. And if you add back in that extra time you can get the correct amounts of people existing at the times from then on stated in the bible. Personally I get kinda why they don't necessarily look at it. It would give people another reason to say the Bible isn't accurate and bla bla you can't trust it. But in this case where you have 3 other sources scholarly approved and studied. I say that as God sais, (paraphrased) "truth shall be known from 2, 3, or more witnesses" that we could safely add those hundred years back in. Whether it got changed accidentally or on purpose that doesn't matter because it doesn't change God's word at all on what happened and why we need Jesus!
Yes.
If you go by the Masoretic text, the years of the patriarchs turn out so that Shem loses all his sons before he dies and is still living when Abraham is born. It looks like a very odd timeline.
But when you go by the LXX and Josephus and I believe also the Samaritan Penatuch, adding the one hundred years to each name, then the time line looks more normal.
There are then enough years to get a good number of people for the building project of the tower at Babel without a rediculous birth rate.
The LXX (Septuagint=70) was the bible of the early Christians and they seem to have thought it sufficient for their needs (with the OT prophesies and all). That is why many prophesies don't read according to their OT references but seem out of sinc. In my estimation, this give credence to more abuse of the scriptures than if they matched better.
But religion has the problem of becoming frozen in place when new information comes to light.
Of course not all the LXX manuscripts are without their problems but the better ones are translated from an earlier Hebrew text than the Masoretic are.
I think the freezing onto the King James version is one of the problems with this because it is translated from the Masoretic text and there is something deceptive about it being "Authorized" by King James. Nevertheless for the most part it is a reasonably good translation for most purposes though I find it troublesome with respect to eschatology where the word for "age" is translated "world" when it should be translated "age".
Never heard about this and I am almost 60. Just enquiring... Because I am thoroughly confused. Does this negate the "young earth" theory?
@@shellianne5767
No, not at all. It just backs up certain events by 650 years. The flood is at 3000BC rather than 2350BC.
I love it, when facts are twisted. Up until the horse I have nothing to complain about. But saying, that horses evolved in 600 years is simply wrong. I mean alone the fact, that the predecessors of the horses lived 50 million years ago and he modern horse lived 1 million years ago throws this claim out of the window. Also its funny, that he described the basics of evolution while trying to avoid the word evolution. Evolution is defined as the change in the characteristics of a species over several generation. So basically out of the common ancestors developed several variations of the animals due to mutation and enviromental changes.
Yes evolution is the change in the characteristics of a species over time that has never been observed which means it is not science, it is faith because you have no proof. The missing link that demonstrates the characteristics of an ape changed over time into a human is still missing, elese there we wouldn't be looking 4 the missing link.
Believe what you want, but don't force me to pay tax dollars to teach your religious beliefs in school. Science is the knowledge of things gained from observation, and replication. No one has observed or replicated a change of a rock into a living creature. You are required to just have faith it occurred.
Separation of church and state should have stopped the denominations of evolution from being taught in schools long ago. Darwin even predicted we would soon find thousands of bones to prove his theory, and if we did not he said his theory should be discarded.
Evolution..or adaptation due to environment, food types available, seasons.
@@jonathanhall7903 more like natural selection. But you can only select from what is available. Natural selection is not a creative force that changes 1 species into a new 1 over time.
The following is not from a creationists.
"Natural selection may have a stabilizing effect, but it DOES NOT PROMOTE SPECIATION. " Daniel Brooks "a downward Slope to Greater Diversity " Science, Vol. 217.24 Sept 1982 p. 1240
It selects, it doesn't create. If you worked in quality control of a automobile factory, and you Selected cars from the factory with certain features, you will never get a space shuttle. It will allways be a car. If the cars you select from do not have wings, you will never get wings due to the fact you can only select from what's available. Cars don't have wings there4 you can't select any that do.
Natural selection is biblical, it doesn't create new species it simply causes them to adapt to an inviroment by selecting the traits already found in the species. Each kind will mate and produce more of its kind but with variations. But it is still the same kind and can still mate.
For example, a house cat can not mate with a lion. But a lion can mate with a leopard, who can mate with a jungle cat that can mate with a lynx that can mate with a bobcat that can mate with a house cat because they are all the same kind, not a different species.
A human can not mate with any kind of ape or monkey and produce offspring because they are not the same kind, there is no link between them... hence the term the missing link.
@@dude8223 Instead of using a very imperfect analogy of a car factory, why not look at the well documented and easily understood actual evolution of wings. They have evolved independently several times, in mammals, birds and insects. It really is very well understood, there's no mystery.
A lot of this makes sense. A few things are off. The cat claws? Cheetahs are cats but their claws don't retract. The bears, the Panda isn't one. They are related to raccoons. Some things don't match but most do.
Pandas are related to racoons, but they are true bears also. Cats and dogs are also related to bears, and share a common ancestor with traits of all three, not mentioned in this video. They also left out the Okapis and Giraffes, which are related to Camels, because they have never been successful in crossbreeding them. Same goes for Tapirs and Hyraxes with Elephants. Neither did he mention that there are Damselflies and Dragonflies living side by side, but are incapable of interbreeding.
The closest relative to the whales?
Hippos
dolphins are whales.
@@thedevilsadvocate5210 dolphins if you are talking species specifically; but as dolphins and whales are the same order
To the whale n dolphins there is also the porpoise and the narwhal
Why would evolutionists "hate" this when it speaks of evolution? I call clickbait.
Also, how do you explain kangaroos? If someone grabbed all animals in existence and put them on a big boat that crash landed in the middle east, why are there zero kangaroo skeletons found anywhere in the middle east or anywhere between there and Australia?
Noah never put the animals in. God brought them to Noah. Go back and reread this. Its very fascinating!
I'm sure there are more things to find. But after years of studying science (and also having done Bible studies) absolutely everything that has been found only leads me to believe that evolution is real and god is a just a method of control that people came up with to explain the many things they didn't understand.
And in the same way you ask me to go back and reread the bible, I ask you to go a read a real scientific text book about evolution.
I think we would have found something by now. I am not sure how two kiwi birds got to New Zealand without getting separated during the ice age. Or two ground sloths getting to Ecuador. Yet, we find all kinds of extinct prehistoric precursor fossils to these animals in their respective geographic locations.
@@joyfulnoise6913 "ask gawd and he will tell you!" Dont you think that if it were that easy we would have all the answers? Quit the bs
@@joyfulnoise6913 if he spoke so clearly and often don't you think that conversion would be widespread and people would have no problem believing?
"There is no God. No one directs the universe."
-Stephen Hawking
Stephen Hawking had some crazy ideas. He never could prove them.
It's the same level of thinking that brought us flat earthers.
Hate is such a strong word. "Evolutionists" may cringe at this video, they may point and laugh at this video, they may face palm at this video, they may shake their head at the grift and half truths in this video. But hate is too strong a word for something this sad. While there is so much to debunk in this video, I will just leave you with one question. A genetic bottleneck is when a species population is so low that there is little to no genetic diversity, with effects similar to inbreeding. Given the two of every "kind" scenario, every single land animal on earth would show evidence of a bottleneck event, let alone inbreeding in their genetic history, at the exact same point in time, why do we not see this?
TAKE OFF HOSER!!!‼️🇨🇦🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🗽‼️
A lot covered in this video, but lets talk about "kinds"
This is how Noah was able to put all the animal on the Ark right? There were no horses, or zebras, or donkeys. They had their common ancestor. They just split into all the animals after The Flood.
That leaves the ark WAY too full still.
Still. When they got off the boat, they had to split into tons of animals and scatter across the world in a very short time period (flood was 2,400 years according to the bible).
This leaves me with more questions than answers.
If we are a simulation, which I am increasingly persuaded that we are, then all of this finger counting going on here is ultimately just a whole lot of heathen nonsense. It makes no sense to harp on these aspects of the Noah account to disprove the basis of the account. Let's say the account went like this:
_And God toldeth Noah to buildeth a boat of specificeth dimensions._
_And it was a bigeth boat._
_Then God commandedeth a bunchest of animals to calmly introduceth themselves to Noah, and then entereth the bigeth boat._
_And so-eth a bunchest of animals did calmly introduceth themselves to Noah, and then entereth the bigeth boat._
_Two-by-two, male and female, did the animals calmly introduceth themselves to Noah, and then entereth the bigeth boat._
_Then God said "I'm gon' make it rain soon. So get ready, cuz here it comes. It's gon' rain for 40 days and 40 nights. Jus' sayin..."_
_And so Noah got ready because of the commandeth of The Lord about it raining and stuffeth like that._
_And the people scoffedeth at Noah when they had heardeth of it raining. They could not believeth such a thingest._
_But sho nuff, it rainest. And the people all drownedeth to deathest._
_The Endeth_
Then you come along and claim "Ok. So lets say the animals all entered the Ark and stuff. How did they all fit? It couldn't have happened because they could not have fit!"
And then, in response, the people of God say "Darn. He's right. All that stuff about God using His Power to make the animals come aboard the Ark, and making it rain and all that, must not have happened because ain't no way God could have fit them on that boat. NO WAY!!!"
(sigh) Humans.
@@dani4157 there is no evidence that a biblical flood happened only 5000 years ago
@@dani4157
God Magic solves all logistical problems!
Those atheists just don't understand.
You should go to the ark encounter then you would see how big the ark really is! it’s all logical how that many animals fit on the ark with their food among other things.
Mount Ararat is 17,000 feet up in the sky. You think Noah, his family and all those creatures just hopped out of the boat and went on their merry way? No! And what about all the animal excrement! It must have really stunk. As far as the flood, yea It could have really happened. All it would take is for the Earth to slightly shift on it's axis. Oh yea, every creature that has EVER lived on planet Earth has eventually gone extinct.
0:18 secs in and he’s already wrong lol
yeah, well he also said "I'm one of the zookeepers at the ark"
HE'S A ZOO KEEPER
in a place that has stuffed animals
that makes sense
You caught that too? LOL. I was honestly on the edge of my seat waiting for him to demonstrate just how a sphere (the Earth) can "All tilt away" at the same time. Thought I was about to see some magic... but dang. The guy didn't even bring a ball. I'm sure he tried at home for about 5 seconds, before throwing the ball down in frustration saying, "I'll just tell them it's what science says. They don't know any better".
Creation scientists are charlatans, seeking to make money off gullible people. I don't disrespect religious people. I don't care what people believe. I have my own beliefs, but I hate people who try to take advantage of other people.
Agreed 🤝
@@martinkuliza What a complete farce the “ark experience” is. Zero scientific value of any kind.
I’m sure Titan would love to know that it needs “nice warm oceans” to have all the ice it does.
At about 10:43, AiG accepts that artificially breeding animals counts as proving relatedness as their gametes are compatible. By this metric, chimps and humans are related because their gametes are also compatible, although the breeding of such species is highly illegal, it’s also scientifically possible.
They are actually not compatible.
Creationists have done their own research and found that the DNA of humans and chimps are not 98% similar. Furthermore, there has been no matching up of gametes between chimps and humans that is proven 100% true and beyond any reasonable doubt. Evolutionists would like to assume that is true but assumptions don't automatically equate to fact.
@@Scorpion-my3dv I don’t put faith in that creationist “research” as it also claimed any two humans only share 87% of DNA, which is quite obviously incorrect.
WRONG, a moose is not a deer it is a relative of the deer.
Does the natural process of evolution not testify to God himself ? Did god not create the evolutionary process ? The creator of all things that have been or ever will be, the master of the universe and ultimate scientist, is evolution just not his work ? Very interesting video. I really like seeing all sides of the lane in a respectful manner(like it should be).
I'm more middle ground which may be why I see it that way. God and evolution are the same thing in my eyes.
I always love seeing this topic of debate, very interesting
Wonderful presentation!
As an ecologist and passionate Christian, I appreciate your clear explanations about how climate affects local vegetation and animal migration patterns. The truth makes perfect sense.
Of course, if we can train elephants now as beasts of burden, why could we not have trained cureloms or cumoms?
Keep up the good work.
What I find most interesting is the EVERY CULTURE ON THE EARTH has a Flood Story and all are dated around the same time🤷🏻♂️have you ever noticed how NO ONE try’s to disprove the Koran, Buddhist, etc teachings..it’s ALWAYS Christianity. These people don’t even understand “why” they are so hateful and “why” they spend their entire lives trying to disprove Biblical things. We know “why” they have evil spirits that they are unaware of that push and prod them
Well, he opened up with Junk science concerning precipitation, warm oceans and cold air.
So if he's going to open this whole discussion with subterfuge, then it's a pretty good bet that the rest is going to be the same.
I live in an area prone to hurricanes caused by the very moisture and hot and cold pressure systems he is describing. Warm wet air from the oceans plus colder air from the land equals precipitation.
I am just fascinated watching this, because ~90% of what he says is universally agreed upon. Equally interesting is how he cleverly "cherry-picks" certain points and declares, "See, proof".
For instance, the "tilt of the earth" versus "underwater volcano" theory. What he neglects to mention is the tilt of the earth theory actually explains a lot of what he is talking about can be explained be a the tilt theory. Why, the tilt theory does not say the entire system would cool. In fact, there would be an offset. Glaciers in the North would be offset be unusual warmth in the south and vice versa.
Sure if you took modern elephants and had them living in Canada for a few generations, they would get furrier over time. I had a friend in BC tell me that Saskatchewan horses are rather furry vs the normal very short hair sort say we have down here. Environment can cause creatures to take on some different features, to the extent their genetics have info for at least.
Ha, evolution well done! 🙂
only to the extent of the genetic info they were given from the parents
This got to be satire, right?
I am just unable to get the joke here.
The Fact that basic Science can debunk this, speaks for itself.
No, unfortunately this is not satire.
Science debunks darwinism. A creature has never been observed to have evolved into a completely different creature, and the fossils are also absent of any such evidence. Evolution only requires an over-active imagination, not observation. Science requires observation.
They actually believe this stuff.
@@waywardgeologist2520 yup. And the fact that they don’t see the irony and the contradictions within their own “theories”, speaks volumes on their ability to comprehend cognitive fallacies
I don't see the problem though.
Since when has science been settled? Science is about theories, debating over them and checking them out to see if they're true.
It is not just a simple proces like in minecraft where you add a little wood and stone to make a pickaxe. It's quite complex in most cases, and getting it right in the absolute way is even harder.
Here is an example of a theory that might be BS but that a lot of scientists believe in:
Quite a few scientists believe in dark matter. We can't see it, touch it nor smell it. We do not have the tools to know if it exists.
Yet they say it exists because it gives us an anwser to certain gravitational effects wich cannot be explained by currently accepted theories of gravity.
For some reason they think 85% of the galaxy is made out of dark matter
(Source: wiki)
Now, there are two roads we can take:
1) Black matter exists and a few scientists are right
2) Black matter doesn't exist, some other scientists are right and the theories of gravity might be a little wrong.
Wich one would you take?
Wow, less than a minute in and he already mis-represents the opposite side's view.
Pretty easy to do when the opposite sides view changes every news cycle.
@Soldier I am a Christian, I just hate seeing us get creamed by arguing against wrong points with fundamental misunderstandings of scientific points. we need more scientists of faith to really put things in their proper context but when I can poke holes in an argument with a middle school understanding of science that these videos do only harm and only serve to reinforce those who were never in danger of losing their faith in the first place. Unfortunately the lack of scientific literacy in videos like this serve only to make science look hokey and completely illogical when it is for the most part entirely a logical system with the fallacies being two-fold. First is that it is a human endeavor which means there is always a bias risk, secondly science is by it's very nature very much a world-based discipline which deals with physical evidence exploring all logical thought and scripture clearly shows there is a choice we have to make by taking a leap of faith to believe it and trust in the Lord which means at some point logic will fail us and faith takes over. This is what is so fascinating about apologetics, archeological evidence being discovered constantly in support of at the very least the New Testament. Literary forensics showing clear and distinct writing styles for the 4 gospels proving they are not just copied from each other. God is truth therefor arguing for his existence should be done with as much accurate truth as we can.
@@Thebuffshaman Sigh i wish people would understand that they can believe in science AND God. This video will do nothing but push people away . This man's ignorance could be the reason someone never seeks out God.
@@michaeltreu4152 Hopefully the comments we leave will be an inspiration.
Trust The SOYANCE.....
Imagine If You Knew You Were LIED against since the Day You Were Born.
Stop arguing about what no one was alive for and argue for where we are going.
First ten seconds, he's got it wrong... Earth tilts "Suddenly", oceans slosh causing tsunamis and increased precipitation, THEN the freezing occurred. It seems that someone read off a few bullet points, ignoring the timeline and context. There's still much much more to it than that, but without proper context and setup, the rest is wasted anyway.
Are u saying u believe in evalution?just curious
@@terrydesjardins3171 Believe in evolution? As in use blind faith that evolution has and is taking place? No. I study the data, I follow the evidence, wherever it may lead. Admittedly, I don't have enough to make a leap in one direction or the other. I do know the order of some things and recognize when someone is inaccurate in their interpretations of what happened and when...
There is strong evidence that the deluge as described in the Book of Genesis has happened. The story is told in many accounts from all over the world by many different cultures. Plato described what is currently called the 'Richat Structure' as the lost city of Atlantis and what shows signs of a great flood dated to approximately the same period as the much contested event of flooding around the Great Sphinx. Studies of sedimentary layers all over the world indicate that global floods (and ice ages) have happened several times and the Great Flood is so far the latest.
There is also strong evidence of evolution taking place, and even in the bible, the simplification of the creation of the universe, solar system, and that of Earth describes everything from just after the Big Bang (The Firmament), creation of Land, Sea, and Sky, Light and Dark, and all the Creatures great and small living on, under, and above the earth.
Just stop and think about it... The Big Guy does this in 7 days... His Days... He being as infinite as the pre-biblical man could understand, a day to Him would be millions, possibly billions of years to mere mortal man. Big guy was a Designer and Mathematician, in so doing, I theorize that 'evolution' was in fact, His prototyping and redesigning all the way up to the final forms the animals shall take.
Well, there are the (somewhat connected) theories that I've put together from my observations of the subject... Am I right? Although I'd love to be, I doubt that I am. I'd like to think I'm close.
Honestly, I don't think anyone alive today knows. I think the Bible (In all of its iterations) have the fundamentals right, but too much could be lost in time and translation. However, it is fun to hypothesize and theorize based on what we DO know so to fill in gaps where we don't know. 🙂
When the fountains of the deep burst open I would say tilted the earth.
I PRESUME THAT WHEN YOU SAY THE BIG GUY YOU MEAN “GOD”. HE CANNOT LIE AND HE SAID IN THE BIBLE THAT HIS CREATION DAYS WERE AN EVENING AND A MORNING, SO HE QUITE LITERALLY MEANS A24 HOUR DAY SO YOU CANNOT FIT YOUR MILLIONS OF YEARS INTO THE BIBLE.
@@bigkev982 I suppose if I took a book rewritten several times over, and translated though several languages and dialects word for word, is be right... Too many millennia, societies, and rewrites have passed since the first scribing to take it so literally.
Hold up, he said that the proof of the ice age was that there couldn't have been ice at the north and south pole. Why not?
🤔
What he explained was that with a planet that was about the same temperature all over whether hot or cold you would not get the evaporation and precipitation to produce ice or glaciers ...you need the water cycle with different temperatures...
Do you or do you not believe in the "earths tilt"?
@@mimikeofficial86 I don't know
@@mimikeofficial86 Oh yes. But not the way the evolutionists describe it. They are so weak on science.
It's pretty odd how creationism has now embraced an even faster version of evolution with magical dividing lines based on what they fabricate out of thin air. It is very strange to see a creationist depicting a basic feline cladogram. Why are cats capable of extremely rapid evolution but the ancestors of humans weren't? Humans are animals too.
Better study your stuff before you make a comment,real side
Science proofs creation
Humans aren't animals. No evidence of any creature evolving into a human. Darwinism has a very long list of "proof" that have been proven to be fraudulent, or fabricated (i.e. Peking Man, Nebraska Man, Orce Man, Piltdown Man, etc.). Cats are still cats, despite the different varieties. That's not the kind of evolution the evolutionists need. They need a 'primordial goop to human kind of evolution'... which is pseudoscience.
@@wimruitenbeek7832 Show us. You seem to have plenty of proof to back up your theory.
Humans aren't animals. Why do we wear clothes? No other creature in the history of the world has ever worn clothing.
Humans aren’t animals? Really? You’re incorrect.
While I am fascinated by what is revealed here, i've come across 2 problems. One, it IS possible for the oceans to warm at the same time as everything else is cooling and this is explained by the same reasoning you used: geothermal activity beneath the ocean surface(it would also explain why the temperature changed as geothermal energy is not infinite, it is powered by the sun). The gases and water vapor will block sunlight, cooling everything while the ocean remains "warm". The second? after viewing some of the other videos about dinosaurs, while there is "some" logic to it, there are a lot of leaps from one spot to another as though "don't focus on this part" . For example, the verse written, "for the wage/s of sin is/are death" does not say that death did not exist, only that sin is PAID with death or GIVEN death. As a Christian, I want to understand more, but here, your logic does not "take captive every thought" or outdo an argument as of 2 Corinthians 10:5. I for one find it fascinating that some of the depictions in ancient carvings and art happen to match Dinosaurs. There is no disputing that. The problem? That is not definitive proof. Correlation does not equal causation. As an example, what happened to the fish-like dinosaurs? While it is theoretically possible that their numbers were reduced by the blotting out of the sun by the rain / snow , what then prevented them from reproducing in the same manner as they had before once the few survivors remained? Were they unable to keep pace with the other animals hunting their eggs? Chances are, unlikely if they were able to survive for thousands of years
A horse and a donkey can make a mule but mules are infertile. Doesn’t that mean horses and donkeys are different species?
" A horse and a donkey can make a mule but mules are infertile. Doesn’t that mean horses and donkeys are different species? "
No, becaosue they got offspring, however all mules are a different "kind", they can not get offspring.
@CMR270 that’s my point, I thought for two creatures who produced infertile offspring were different species
Well, I am not sure if you are a YEC'er or not, the problem with "kind" is that it is not defined what it is. YEC community use arbitrary definitions that suits the discussion point for the moment. Kind is not a term used within biology (I was a little sarcastic in my post of the donkey).
However within the "flower kingdom" the concept of biblical kind completely de rail.
There are plenty examples of where two different flowers can get a fertile offspring but this offspring can only get offspring with it's own "kind" and not with either parents.
So in the biblical sense of "bring forth of their own kind", this new offspring is indeed a new "kind" by the biblical definition.
But the YEC community dismiss this (by suddenly use a new definition of kind) saying that the off spring and parents are still flowers, therefore not a new kind.
So the "kind" concept is completely useless, added to this is that the YEC community shield itself by saying that evolution should result in that dogs produce rabbits (which is a completely straw man).
So when YEC'ers says, there is no example of a kind produce a new kind ("bring forth of their own kind") and you show them these flowers, they suddenly leave the bible and say something in line with "it is still a flower".
All hybrids are infertile my theory is God made it this way as a fail-safe to prevent to many mutations
@@demoworks
"All hybrids are infertile my theory is God made it this way as a fail-safe to prevent to many mutations"
Well, reality is different from what you have been told.
Lions and tigers hybridize they produce a liger. Ligers are fertile and can mate with other ligers, lions, or tigers.
Heliconius butterflies, sun flowers and tuco-tucos are other examples.
I want someone to explain to me how Noah fed all the animals that have extremely specific diets without modern shipping methods. Then they can explain how all the saltwater animals including coral didn't die out from the salinity crash that would happen if that much rain occured not to mention the lack of sunlight from being under thousands of feet of water. Then explain how the predators survived when they require hundreds of pounds of meat a month to live. Then explain how Noah managed to keep alive creatures that modern man can't keep alive in captivity with our advanced artificial environment capabilities. Then explain how the trees that are older than this mythical flood survived. Sorry the flood of the bible is just a modern retelling of the flood of Gilgamesh and oral tales of the last ice age melting and flooding all the coastal regions world wide.
Good question.
The best Question on this thread, so far. and since the Flood occured ~ 2390-2500 years [depends upon your source] before Christ's birth, how does this leave any time for the evolving of varieties of species? Since the Egyptian and Chinese dynasties were already extant at these dates, did they migrate back through time or something? The pyramids were built between 2630 - 2550 B.C., by the most conservative estimates. This is a pretty tight window!
God magic!
Genetics has proven there was no evolution. That's the latest science.
God can do ANYthing He wants to! Why don't you just take that step and believe in Christ Jesus as our Savior and you can ask God Almighty anything you want to about Noah's flood. We'll have lots of time for questions, eternity......
The Great Deep in Gen 7:11 refers the the same deep from Gen 1:2 and was separated with the firmament in Gen 1:5 and is the frozen sea that the Throne of God sits on in Rev 4:6. The water for Noahs flood came from Heaven (as in; Gen 7:11 "the windows of heaven were opened"). Praise God.
So are you a flat earther?
@@JCTheSniper15 no is in scriptures
@@valvbl9022 yeah, I'm tracking that.
The whole intro makes no sense. New York gets more snow than Antarctica, yet Antarctica is essentially a giant glacier and new York isn't. Its almost like creationists literally have to ignore basic facts just to say a thing in a book happened.
Well it's the flat earth thing plus, lost cause etc.
absolute nonsense. Never sure why people believing in religion try to prove that their words are real and true. If it was true you wouldn't need to prove it, only lies need substance so they can be fed to those that need to believe or don't believe.
I don't at all hate this video, I'm encouraged to see that creationists have learned of scientific method and have begun to supplement dogma with fact. It's a very good start - I know it's hard, but keep going!
Religion and Science blend about as well as oil and water. Sure you can shake and stir it all up, but it’s still just oil and water, and in this example Science is the only one that floats above the other.
I agree with you but I hope you don't throw all things said by religions away with mythology. There is a lot to learn from them. But I do agree with you on this subject.
@@daviddauterman325 Nonsense. Science and religion walk hand in hand if one studies the Bible and other ancient writings in context of time, and fully researches the various translations, recognizing that it's an assimilation of a body of historic works, many which were not included or interpreted. The problem is separating the diehard theists from the dogma of their chosen religions. I don't think evolution is the question separating science from religion. I think creation is the question. I believe in a creation by a single God but I also believe it's possible that a scalar energy field decayed into radiation and particles, creating the elements necessary for a Big Bang ... I don't believe in a meddling interfering God I believe science and reality but I also absolutely believe in a personal relationship with God and another place for our energy to recycle after death ... and that will forever remain a mystery. As will God except by faith.
religion is mans methods for worshiping the Creator hence the Universal Truths. Would you speak this way about Islamics or Hidus - they know about Universal Truths. Native Americans also know the Truths. Science is late to the game but supports Universal Truth if done honestly. Truth does not have an agenda but many performing in the field of science do, just like some using religion for their personal gain.
Fascinating! Thank you for all your hard work.
How do you watch this and find it fascinating? He is cherry picking convenient connections in science to superimpose them into his noahs ark story while ignoring all science that contradicts any or all of it. This video makes people less intelligent after watching
Yes he does seem to cherry-pick his evolutionary time lines where a specie can be as small as a dog then over the next 6 thousand years grow to twice the size of an elephant then back to dog size. Not one of these so-called scientists have ever tried to explain Australia’s unique wildlife and fossils, it just doesn’t conform to any of their theories!
@@kenmatthews8426 Australias megafauna is a product of the enviroment and being isolated before the land bridge. Megalania was so huge because of the prey it had like diprotodon.
@@kenmatthews8426 Also the reason that dog sized creatures is allowed to be that big is for many factors such as competition, lack of competition, or niches that had to be filled after the top predators died out.
The Bible has already been translated by the best translators alive today in Mauro Biglino and Paul Wallis. Mauro Biglino is very well known and respected for his ability to accurately translate the original Jewish Bible to the Christian Bible used by the Vatican. Paul Wallis is also well known and respected for his knowledge and understanding of scripture. His Eden book series is shining a light on how the Church has kept people in the dark about the true nature of our existence. The problem people have with Mauro's and Paul's accurate translations of the scriptures is that the scriptures have been mistranslated numerous times over the centuries and those mistranslations (probably intentional) have told a very different story from the Jewish Bible. That, along with the intentional editing and omitting of original scriptures (the Books of the Apocrypha) at the First Council of Nicaea, have given us the 'King James' version of the Bible for Western Christianity. You know, the version that shows Jesus as a tall, slender, fair-skinned, long brown-haired white man. LOL. This has lead to many people, such as the ones presenting here, to perpetuate a false narrative regarding what the scriptures are actually telling us. The King James Version is the absolute worst version to use when trying to understand what these stories were about. The Old Testament is not a story about God, it is a story about Extraterrestrial intervention in the 'evolution' of human beings. I've always had a difficult time understanding why people believe in a God for which there is zero evidence and simultaneously reject the idea of Extraterrestrials for which there is a mountain of evidence of hundreds of sightings, videos, pictures and even physical evidence. I suppose it has to do with people fearing that there might not actually be a personal God who answers all our prayers.......because there isn't. Show me some evidence of Gods existence that is verifiable and I will gladly consider it, but since I've been saying that for many years now and no one has presented anything to me I must conclude that no such evidence exists. On the contrary, there is no shortage for evidence of human suffering on a global scale since the beginning of time. That's why the Old Testament is all about the cruelty of the 'Powerful Ones' not God who did heinous things to us in antiquity and are still doing heinous things to us today. Didn't you ever wonder why the 'God(s) of the Old Testament were so different from the God Jesus talked about in the New Testament? The difference is like night and day. Old Testament God(s) wanting to be worshipped and sacrificed to, and cruel beyond the pale. New Testament God no sacrificing, no worshipping, all about love. Anyway, if you have the courage to challenge your beliefs (and most of you don't) here's the link to Mauro and Paul's discussion of what the Bible actually says. th-cam.com/video/ALmXC9oGFSw/w-d-xo.html
That would explain the Sahara desert. They’ve been finding ancient rivers and buried pyramids and other structures underneath the sand that probably existed during the Ice Age when there was more water running, branching off of the Nile. As the Ice Age started to dissipate a desert started to form.
Plus a burgeoning population running grazing animals without knowing how to prevent overgrazing to the point of desertification
This guy is literally Biology/ Prehistory for Dummies but the stuff he can’t prove in 12 words or less he just points to a random page to the Bible instead of actually looking into stuff and seeing actual scientific causes and reasons that anything happens. Ie: crossbreeding of species is something that is related to chromosomes, DNA and genomes, test this dude just points at some quote of the Bible, which funnily enough also disprove this because of evolution, saying God created beasts to be ‘according to their own minds’ yet these why hybrids often have defects and cannot further reproduce, showing how flawed just one part of his argument is, and how many things he leaves out to try to prove that the Bible is all right and stuff
Of course he doesn't properly address the time bit which will negate this fairy tale. He said, it took approx 600 years for animals from the ark to branch into kinds we see today, and that the ice age helped disperse them across the earth following the flood. With Egypt being in a famine as described in Joseph's story, it means the Sahara desert was already formed and the earth had stabilized so, that the ice age was over. This would imply that the whole ice age period took 400 years or less? Just by assessing glacial formation, unless the earth dropped at least 50deg C instantly, it takes thousands of years to form glaciers and commensurate time for the glaciers to recede. Attempting to fit this whole tumultuous geological activity into 400-600 years just to make the narrative fit says a lot about the credibility of this presentation. As well, ocean based geological activity that 'started' the flood, would mean worldwide undersea earthquakes enough to raise ocean temperature by at least 5 deg for the rain. The part glossed over is the mega tsunamis that would arise from undersea earthquakes. No wooden ship let alone this ark would be able to withstand +100m waves coming from all directions.
Lastly, as expected, he ignores which mammal was carried into the ark, that branched out into whales, dolphins and orcas 😂 again within 600 years.
Preach!
Agree this video is incongruent with my observation of His creation. Time and sequence of adaptation of created animals needs to be explained otherwise it is misrepresentation of Genesis creation.
The reason secular scientists think it took so long for the ice sheets to form is because they aren't considering the possibility of warm oceans. Warm oceans would mean much more precipitation, so it wouldn't take as long for the ice to build up. There have been computer models demonstrating this possibility. Warm oceans from volcanic activity combined with cool air from all the ash and debris filtering out sunlight results in ice sheets exactly where we know they existed in a relatively short amount of time.
It is quite likely there were tsunamis. The Bible mentions that the "fountains of the great deep (ocean) were broken open." However, if the ark was not constructed near shore, the tsunamis would not be likely to cause damage to the ark itself, just like people in the mountains survive tsunamis and people many miles from the coast would never even know there had been a tsunami if no one brought them word. It's weird that you'd assume the ark would be built along the coast when there is plenty of land far from shore. With a massive underwater volcanic event, the tsunamis would destroy the coast land, and the super heated water would trigger massive amounts of rain.
Interestingly, the dimensions given for the ark are very stable dimensions for a large ship, so even if you think the account was made up, whoever wrote it had a good grasp on ship building. If it is true, the boat would be seaworthy for the purposes of bobbing over massive waves.
Regarding marine mammals, marine animals were not taken on the ark. That seems fairly obvious, and I'm surprised it has to be said. The Bible mentions fowls, cattle, creeping things, everything that creeps on the earth, everything that moves on the ground, and everything that was on dry land. Nowhere there does it mention anything that lives exclusively in water. Marine life would be expected to survive to some degree on its own. Of course massive amounts were buried, as we see with fish fossils by the thousands, some with another fish half eaten, but enough would survive to reproduce later.
@@bradthompson5383 thank you for your well thought out scientific response.
@@jessb9514 oh do tell what computer models support this seemingly impossible climate. Were they put together by someone trying to reverse engineer the results like say an answers in genesis employee or fan.
Watching from Greece.hi everybody.
Great video.
This guy’s lecture is full of flaws. He fails to mention that most hybrid animals are infertile. So much for the “kind” theory. Earth’s tilt called obliquity is only one of the three milankivich cycles which takes 41,000 years. Precession, earth’s axial wobble takes 26,000 years. Eccentricity, the shape of earth’s orbit takes 100,000 years. All those along with continental drift, ocean circulation, solar output, and volcanic activity are all factors in climate change causing ice ages and warm spells and happen over eons of time. To believe that continental glaciers 2 miles thick formed then melted in the span of a few hundred years is absurd. He also mentions nothing about radio metric and other methods of dating. Of course his evangelical audience who are totally ignorant of science will buy this baloney.
Where did the water that covered the Earth come from??? Water increases in volume when it freezes, moving from a liquid to a solid state. If "all water" plus "all ice" does not cover the Earth's continents, then "all water" plus "less water from ice" will not cover even less of the continents.
@@chrisgraham2904 , The only answer is magic.
@@chrisgraham2904 Water came for the sky, and huge underwater caverns in the Earth. This water would eventually fill the oceans, lakes and rivers. The Earth in the not so distant past has very few valleys and mountains. During the Flood, and shortly after, the mountains rose, and the valleys sank, which gave us our oceans, and our high mountains like Mt. Everest. The valleys were able to sink because the water no longer filled the huge caverns. It's called, displacement.
@@11aaf LOL You really need to learn some science. At least grade 5 science. Water cannot fall from the sky as rain, unless the waters of the oceans evaporate to provide water to the sky. Where are these "Huge underwater caverns in the Earth" and by what means of hydraulic principles cause them to vacate and add to the oceans? The volume of extra water from the caverns would have to exceed the volume of the amount of water in the oceans today. What filled the voids in the caverns when the water was displaced, or was gravity suspended during this time? After the flood, where did the extra water go? Water cannot evaporate into space. That's a cute fairy tale story, but there is no evidence to support such nonsense.
Who on Earth told you that "in the not so distant past, the Earth had very few valleys and mountains? Ken Ham? The surface of the Earth has been constant flux as tectonic plates move producing mountains and valleys. None more violently than during the time of the great continent of Pangea This occurred from about 200-300 million years ago (late Paleozoic Era until the very late Triassic), when our present continent, we now know as North America was contiguous with Africa, South America, and Europe. Enormous mountains, many exceeding the altitude of Mt. Everest and valleys, exceeding the depth of the Mariana trench existed during that time. You must be a follower and believer in the fallacy of a 6,000 year old Earth. Ken Ham needs to stop paying huge sums of money to discredited people with science degrees, who are willing to sell their credentials to produce pseudo science for the Creationist community. You may find some allies in the Flat Earth Society.
Please do not respond. I know it's useless to provide reason to you.
@@chrisgraham2904 The water is in the crust, they've recently found vast oceans underneath the ground.
Nice video, but when you started displaying all those bones and mentioning the largest animals ever to walk the Earth, I thought you would at least mention dinosaurs. Where do they exactly fit into all this?
I think these were found during the last Ice Age not 65 million years ago
How did everything get to Australia from central Asia? Or Hawaii...? Did Noah have Penguins, if so where did he get those from?
Yes haha
and how did the 2 lions in ALL OF AFRICA survive when there were only 2 zebras, 2 buffalos, 2 gazelles etc etc in ALL OF AFRICA? and what did that grass eating animals eat when all the plants were dead from being underwater for 40 days? Seems like every animal would have starved to death.
@@shmobiden6860 They all ate mana from heaven. Boom faith mic drop
@@ynkybomber so they ate imaginary food from an imaginary place? Faith-it makes sense if you don't think about it.
@@shmobiden6860I’m wondering if there’s a difference between faith and blind belief? Speculative question, because I have no answer to the question I’ve asked.
1 Peter 3:10
For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile:
We Denè have been here living with the moose, caribou and bears for thousands of years. They must have forgot how to quickly diversify after that first 600yrs because they still look the same as their oldest pictures and bones. And none of those animals were as giant as the dinosaur fossils we're finding here in American that seems to be missing from all recorded human records (not even on cave walls) and seemed to have died in a mass extinction that didn't involve any of the kinds of animals available during the flood.. And I believe he was mislabeling bones and mummified corpse with fossils..
There are what appear to be dinosaurs on cave walls.
And there are fossilized dinosaur footprints with fossilized human footprints inside them. Indicating that both existed together and walked the same game trails.
If your local wildlife has not changed in 4000 then maybe it reached the height of adaptation to that environment within it's genetic code? Maybe you need 600 years in a different environment to see what other adaptations exist within their genetics.
There are cave paintings of man with dinosaurs in S America also Native burial site that had original Hebrew... we ARE only ONE RACE... HUMAN RACE... seek and YE SHALL FIND...
Another invisible magic man in the sky theory show.
No one claims that God is a man who lives in Earth's sky. That would be as silly as saying that people came from fish.
@@Radrook353 if God did exist it would be female,Adam is bored to death in the garden asks God for something beautiful exciting and high maintenance and she gives him a woman now if God was a man Adam would have got a Ferrari.
@@surfaceten510n Nice joke.
The video gets crazier the longer you listen
Not really, he seems to just be teaching us about environmental adaptation of different species.
Explain how. I'm listening...
were u watching the same video what is crazy about a cat being able to produce nothing but another cat all he gave was accurate evidence
I see nothing in this vid that those that accept the reality of evolution would "hate", so much as ignore as not supported by the available evidence. As soon as you take evidence, and shoehorn it to fit the scriptures in the bible, then your theories are no longer valid.
7:24 "I think that history can only be undertstood in light of what we see in scripture." So much for science!
Loser
@@tjc874 I agree, he is.
I get it could help shed light on and hint at things, but sciences try to understand the complete picture
There was a global flood after the last ice age, 11, 600 years ago. The oxygen saturation in the atmosphere affects how big animals get. It was much higher in the distant past.
You must have a time machine, to know there was an ice age 11,600 yrs ago, and then a worldwide Flood after that? The higher saturation of oxygen fits biblical facts, since the plants and trees grew bigger than they do today. And there were a lot more plants before the Genesis Flood.
@@pedalandpop783 There was a massive flood according to many reputable archeological findings. It was caused by a massive Ice dump into the Atlantic. It has a scientific name that escapes me
Yep. However, how did you arrive at 11,600 years figure?
@@11aaf Great point. And today, they cry about CO2 'pollutants'!
@James Ratliff
If someone didn't understand the water cycle, it might actually appear as if the dew came up out of the ground every morning.
Good thing we know actually how this happens today.
😂 😂 😂
This was a great lecture on evolution.
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ bro bro jesus is your imaginary friend
@Chicken Noodle No, he's real. Jesus is my favorite Mexican friend. He's a great man.
@Repent and believe in Jesus Christ "I don't know how the earth was formed so I look back at a 2,000 year old crusty book
Oh and also you said something skydaddy don't like so yea" 🤡
@@chickennoodle5018 Yall are saying this with what proof exactly?
I put all my love and trust into Jesus and God, they know what is best for me eternally. Love you Jesus and God, Amen.
Did he say or imply that mammoths and elephants had a common ancestor ? This is a very good explanation.
For sure they did. In every generation, there are about 70 Billion possible gene expressions. That's how we get so many different elephants and dogs. but they are still elephants. they are still dogs. Fish don't become birds. Natural selection also plays a part also. Some structures are so complicated as to be mathematically impossible by chance, no matter how many billions of years. For example, how many Billions of years until a Rolex accidentally assembles itself in the ocean and washes up on shore?
@@PlateletRichGel Evolution refers to LIVING things NOT manmade ones like a Rolex so your argument is spurious.
@@PlateletRichGel Yeah that's quite obvious
I'd love to see a creationist explain the difference between micro-evolution _(which they generally accept)_ and macro-evolution _(which they reject)_ ... since it's the exact same thing, just a matter of time/degrees.
I could draw a sequence of pictures that change from a fish to a bird... draw enough of them, and you'd never be able to pick out a single picture and say _"left of this is fish, right of this is bird"_ without highlighting the absurdity of labels.
I also love how Christians keep trying to say _"Science says..."_ when they're in their own groups - yet, in debate, those same statements are always completely refuted by actual scientists. It's a lie... a deliberate misrepresentation...
To be honest, I think these creationists just have such a "small" view of God, that they think he creates like a human craftsman. God with a small 'g'... and cannot even consider the fact that setting into progress a vast evolutionary system from just a simple set of rules requires a far more majestic God than satisfies their egos or fits within their tiny experiences.
But then, they also claim to understand God and what he wants...
_"Si enim comprehendis, nom est deus"_ - St. Augustine
If you can understand it, then it ain't God !!!
@@garychap8384 that's because they're ALL nuts.
With all this talk of giant animals during the ice age I was hoping he would mention human giants...
👍👁
Book of Enoch
“The heroes of old” nephelim.
i love how he glossed over the incest and inbreeding required to repopulate the world with just ONE family. Talk about disgusting. Nevermind that its impossible to build a stable population from just a couple of breeding pairs. But christians love their incestual relationships.
@@donaldvermillion1253 Genetic information loss is a real thing. Genetic diversity of untold magnitudes has been lost.
I have a serious question: IF the story of Adam and Eve is a fact … How do you explain the Cave Man and the evolution of mankind to what he is today?
Were you actually listening when he explained about "kinds after their kinds", and variations only within those kinds???
@@joeboudreault2226 Wasn't there something about people being outside of Eden?
@@joeallen7981 I don't think so.
@@joeboudreault2226 Yes I did, do you have reading comprehension problems?
@@DavidWilson-eu1mv Absolutely not. What is your problem??
We're nothing special, just another species on this planet and one day we'll be gone too...
I saw a Tiger in a zoo. I did not know these Tigers were Giants. Huge gigantic animals and I am 6 foot tall. Same zoo I saw a Crocodile is about 6 feet wide and 20 plus foot long. Old Crocodile.
Vxenon67 - Look up Mamre Massacre, vintage WWII.. amazing story.. I think I saw the story on TH-cam.. but, not sure 🤔
lol 20 plus feet huh? The longest recorded is 20 feet and 3 inches. So where was this Zoo?
@@THOTHvii Phillipines 1980's
I've heard that reptiles will keep growing as long as they live. They probably lived a very long time before the Genesis Flood event, and were probably enormous, and we call them dinosaurs today.
@@vxenon67 And the WWII massacre I mentioned, there were hundreds that size and bigger. The American military tried to get the Japanese soldiers to surrender, because they had retreated in to the swamp.. They could hear their screams, being eaten alive..
I am a Latter Day Saint member, and I just love the way you put your lecture out for ALL to see here. Thank you!
Having read the Bible cover-to-cover, many times, starting over when I finish, over the last 40+ years, I find nothing incompatible between evolution and scripture, which is not to say evolution theory is correct, but deserves independent scrutiny. What is incompatible is taking someone else's speculation about what scripture means and giving it the same weight as the actual words in the Bible.
Sometimes I wonder if I missed my calling. All my life since age 12 I have focused on , and studied history but have learned to really enjoy videos on archaeology !
Theres always time to step into it. Moses' ministry started at the age of 80
If your calling to study archeology was based on this you'd be better off being a janitor.