It is time to say goodbye to both the 757 and especially the 767. I loved the 757 but compared to the A321 I’d pick the Airbus every single time. This diversification will be good for United
Im American and I hate to see this but I completely understand why and support it. I won’t buy an American vehicle either. Poor quality, even worse engineering, and horrible customer service by American automakers. I’m sure it’s a very similar situation with Airplanes
Can't blame United. Boeing has left them in a pickle as Boeing has with many carriers thwarting growth and costing them millions. Aside from reliability, Airbus just has a better product and a more diverse product line. If you've been on a 321, 330 or 350 neo, you know the passenger experience is simply superior. Add in the politics behind Boeing, their corruption and treatment of employees and it's no wonder Boeing is losing business to Airbus.
@zhaolaogong Those were amazing airplanes when Beoing ruled the skies. I follow many pilots and there are lots who won't even fly the Max. Boeing isn't what it used to be which is why even American carriers are buying Airbus who simply makes a better aircraft and is a far more ethical company.
The United boss made a great choice. The thing is why is an airline going to wait so long on aircraft the has not even been certified meanwhile they have the other option that is taking orders and about to enter service. Seems reasonable to ditch Boeing and go with Airbus
United is one of the OEM’s most significant airline customers, with 736 in-service Boeing aircraft in its fleet and another 487 on order, according to Aviation Week Network Fleet Discovery database-a mix of 737-10s (157), -8s (26), -9s (147), and 787s (157). In late January, the airline announced it would remove the 737-10 from internal plans, stopping short of canceling the order and directing Boeing to prioritize 737-9s. Doesn't seem like they are running for the door.
Oh my ! I think United Airlines CEO revealed to say "Goodbye" to BOEING and turn to AIRBUS maybe because of United Airlines wanted to partnership with Delta Airlines that choose AIRBUS over BOEING. I wish Garuda Indonesia will say "Goodbye" to BOEING and turn to AIRBUS for the future same like United Airlines.
United partnering with Airbus makes sense because both companies are partnered with Palantir. This adds to streamlining their interactions between the businesses 📈
@@FLIGAVIAchrist almighty, have you ever flown long hall trains n the flying pencil ? It’s a passenger nightmare - the 757 is something like 6 or 7” narrower than the A320 for the same number of passengers across the two aisles. Horrible experience, truly horrible.
No lie being a test pilot seems so fun. When else are you going to be able to do steep climbs steep turns test for stalls and maximum altitudes and performance. Gotta be the best job in the world
United is looking at the WORLD, not just the United States! Certified pilots on aircraft lool like the key to this mixture. Flying an Airbus is different than flying Boeing!
That's ironically strange that's finally Airbus giving reason to Boeing concerning the battle between "hub to hub" vs "point to point". Boeing didn't replace 747 arguing it's not necessary because market will prefer little planes vs jumbo to doing point to point travels. Finally 321xlr is the best choice to be sure to fill a route point to point and 777x will be the biggest plane available on the market...if Boeing is able to put it on the market one day.
It’s an approach up until Airbus has a major issue. Cycles run in aviation and Airbus is no exception. Or Airbus continues to develop single pilot abilities and then UAL pilot list shrinks. Now this isn’t happening immediately, but reality tells us cockpits went from five person crew to now two. One and zero will come one day; which day that happens is the big question. People tell me they’d never get into a plane with no pilot. Statistically 8 in 10 accidents (80%) are caused by humans.
Maybe yes or no. There is an Airbus plant in Mobile, Alabama. Capitalism would dictate that an airline choose the best widget so if Airbus makes a better plane then that's no different than England choosing a Boeing aircraft over an Airbus.
Knee personally if I was going to Europe, I would not fly in narrow bought aircraft. I would use airlines that have widebodied. Yeah it’s saving the airline money, but the passengers comfort is declined.
Well other airlines especially CO did it starting in the 90's. The big destinations are always served by widebodies. They only use narrow bodies to places like TFE and AGP. In those cases, be happy it's on a nonstop. That's the whole point.
757 is a baller plane, they just need to re-engine it and update the existing design with 787 style wings and lighter air frame with composites. Just bring back the 757 call its the 757X IDK
777x has too many seats for some destinations and would be losing money because they couldn't fill the majority of the seats. A smaller aircraft that has fewer seats but a similar range would be suitable because you can fill all or the majority of the seats per flight.
If Boeing was smart, they would try to negotiate a deal with Airbus so that they could produce the A320 series under license. It would help out Boeing tremendously.
@@GavinEditz4059 It is not simping, it is called making choices. Since the stop of the production of the 757/767 Boeing hasn't competed in the medium-range market. And the only suitable and reliable aircraft manufacturer for medium-haul aircraft is Airbus with its A321XLR.Of course it is sad that the Boeing 757/767 are being retired, but efficiency is a really an important matter nowadays.
@@FLIGAVIAexcept they will be late to the party and Airbus will have the majority market share. By the time a 797 is delivered those 321s will be 10 years old. Who is going to wait that long
I'm sorry, there is NO WAY you are Cramming me on ANY Single aisle Jet for 10 or 11 hours, People forget about deep vein thrombosis, on single aisle there is no where to go to walk or stretch, this increases your risk of DVT. Now Don't even think about the galley the flight attendants will eat you alive and tell you to take your seat. SIngle aisle are great for short hops (up to 5 hours) So I only fly Wide body (Twin Aisle) Abroad.
If I remember correctly United has an order for 45 A350-900s however the deliveries have been deferred multiple times. Don’t think they’d receive them until the 2030s
These videos drive me insane, I'm not sure why I am bothering to comment. But there is no operations connection between a321xlr and 777x. Why mention them together as potential competing strategies?
There are so many varieties like kids in a candy store . Pax choose comfort. CEO believe in saving money. Thats hard to combine. The railroad tracks never meet. Converge,?
Airliners could be more flexible on routes if additional external fuel tanks can be hooked on wing pylons such as on military aircraft. So why are air transport companies not using this method? Will be much cheaper than buying different a.c. variants just to cope with longer haul routes.
Isn't there an ongoing problem with quality assembly issues.., with the Boeing 787? I'd think an aircraft operator would want to see these alleged issues solved before committing to purchasing this model of aircraft?
@zhaolaogong Ha ha you are correct the boeing is quieter right now as it does not even fly as it has not been certified. You can wait for it while I fly on whatever is available, prefer the a350-900 and 1000.
After 2 million miles, I just said goodbye to UNITED. There is a good reason for that! I can tell you why most US airlines don't like the A3211 and it is very simple. They like the twin bogey landing gear on the B757 and Airbus stubbornly won't move away from single.
No - 757 are dirt cheap for the airline as the debt they took to buy them has almost completely been paid off - but at the cost of lower efficiency. Nothing to do with MLG bogies - all the airlines care about is the bottom line. More wheels/tyres = more cost = airlines unhappy = your argument debunked
UAL is slowing down pilot hiring because Boeing is not able to deliver new aircrafts on schedule. UAL and Boeing have gone overboard with DEI hiring. When you hire people because of their sexual preference over their ability to produce good job performance, you are asking for trouble. This is paramount in aviation. In the end you must have the ability to do the job well!
I won't be flying United then. As bad as the new accountants running Boeing have allowed them to get, the basic airframes of their aircraft are better than Airbus, and most of the major air crashes in the last 40-50 years have been AIrbus aircraft. from flawed pitot tubes, to bad sensors, to design problems. The issues with Boeing are software, and lazy union workers that aren't being watched like they used to be. Example: the 737 is the most widely used aircraft in the world and one of, if not the most used commercial jet in history. If it was basically that bad, it wouldn't be. I've worked on them and they're a great airframe. The new Max version shows that you can try to take shortcuts and ruin something great. But Airbus is flawed from the beginning. Heck, the French invented the word sabotage! Plus of course, the more the U.S. fleet become reliant on FOREIGN suppliers, then the less control we'll have over our own destiny. If we have a dispute with the EU or any European entity, they can then shut down parts, supplies, support, etc., then what is United (or any other U.S. based carrier) going to do?
Bit of a silly comment., 737's alone have had more crashes than all Airbus aircraft combined. But the Airlines have pretty much the same safety record overall. Speaks like a petty American child not getting their own way and throwing all their toys out the window.
@@FLIGAVIA tell me how it is insightful? It is a petty comment that makes no sense. Ignores Boeing incidents ocer the past 6/7 years and goes directly to a crash almost 20 years ago.
@@AllyD565 Not really, As a former USAF crew chef who was certified on over 16 different aircraft from 737 to SR-71's is NOT silly, its real world EXPERIENCE. The airframe and construction of these planes are far superior to Airbus. I can walk up to any of them and have done a visual that I find WAY more issues than most airlines want to admit. But the crashes that have happened for 737 have been from lack of maintenance and other human errors, from pilot to ground crew. Not pitot tube failures, landing gear issues, windows failure etc. Southwest flies737 almost exclusively and I was able to solve an issue with the aircraft that was keeping it grounded that the ground crew couldn't find. That's not the first time this has happened either. The training or lack thereof for many ground crews in civilian airlines can take a good solid plane and add problems. Mostly because the airlines are more concerned with flight hours than safety. But Airbus is more concerned with many things other than a solid design. Once a bad design is made, you can't correct for it. It's inherent. Like the old Lockheed L-1011 vs the DC-10. I've worked on both and the DC-10's are still flying because of this reason. While the L-1011's are out in the deserts collecting dust. Same place that many Airbus aircraft should be. Right now SOFTWARE and poor build quality because of bad management is the problem for the 737 and Boeing in general
![ร้อยพ่อพันแม่ - WanMai [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XY2pNYASEbg/mqdefault.jpg)
I once flew LAX-EWR on a United B757. It was a very comfortable plane even in economy.
757 is my true love!
It is time to say goodbye to both the 757 and especially the 767. I loved the 757 but compared to the A321 I’d pick the Airbus every single time. This diversification will be good for United
They should still keep all 757 around for domestic routes since they were recently reconfigured. THIS strategy makes sense.
Im American and I hate to see this but I completely understand why and support it. I won’t buy an American vehicle either. Poor quality, even worse engineering, and horrible customer service by American automakers. I’m sure it’s a very similar situation with Airplanes
Can't blame United. Boeing has left them in a pickle as Boeing has with many carriers thwarting growth and costing them millions. Aside from reliability, Airbus just has a better product and a more diverse product line. If you've been on a 321, 330 or 350 neo, you know the passenger experience is simply superior. Add in the politics behind Boeing, their corruption and treatment of employees and it's no wonder Boeing is losing business to Airbus.
corruption?
@@kendalldad thank you Mr Airbus employee
@@zhaolaogongdon’t mention Boeing employee
@@kendalldad oh BS. Boeing is a much better aircraft, hands down. I am only sorry that you can’t get a flight on a 707 anymore
@zhaolaogong Those were amazing airplanes when Beoing ruled the skies. I follow many pilots and there are lots who won't even fly the Max. Boeing isn't what it used to be which is why even American carriers are buying Airbus who simply makes a better aircraft and is a far more ethical company.
The United boss made a great choice. The thing is why is an airline going to wait so long on aircraft the has not even been certified meanwhile they have the other option that is taking orders and about to enter service. Seems reasonable to ditch Boeing and go with Airbus
United is one of the OEM’s most significant airline customers, with 736 in-service Boeing aircraft in its fleet and another 487 on order, according to Aviation Week Network Fleet Discovery database-a mix of 737-10s (157), -8s (26), -9s (147), and 787s (157). In late January, the airline announced it would remove the 737-10 from internal plans, stopping short of canceling the order and directing Boeing to prioritize 737-9s. Doesn't seem like they are running for the door.
ngl, just flew the a350 900, FRA to LAX. What a great airliner.
Oh my ! I think United Airlines CEO revealed to say "Goodbye" to BOEING and turn to AIRBUS maybe because of United Airlines wanted to partnership with Delta Airlines that choose AIRBUS over BOEING. I wish Garuda Indonesia will say "Goodbye" to BOEING and turn to AIRBUS for the future same like United Airlines.
nobody is saying goodbye to Beoing
But many part of it airlines saying goodbye to BOEING@@nickolliver3021! And turn to AIRBUS for not corruption case.
Boeing isn't going away friend 🇺🇲
@@James-FL it’ll just get obliterated out of business as the years go on 🇪🇺
A rapidly growing number of passengers are avoiding Boeings.
That's right! I saw so many people say that if it's Boeing they won't go
That's funny. I work in the industry and haven't noticed that at all.
@@panam747 I’m a pilot and I sure have. Talk to reservations. They hear it every day.
@@jerrypolverino6025 Who calls reservations?
United partnering with Airbus makes sense because both companies are partnered with Palantir. This adds to streamlining their interactions between the businesses 📈
Thanks for your information.
UNITED AIRLINES SHOULD ORDER AT LEAST 100 A321 XLR AND 50 A350 - 900 , 50 A350 - 100 .
I feel that A350 is much more comfortable than B-777 in landing.
@@huiliu-noaaaffiliate6738 Well, that is just nonsense.
United had no choice. The last few Boeing BOD’s trashed the company for their own criminal greed. Bean counters destroyed an engineering company.
UA isn't leaving Boeing; this is just clickbait.
Boeing has not a replacement aircraft for 757.
Stupid Boeing the way to go was 757 instead of 737
757 is so good!
@@FLIGAVIAchrist almighty, have you ever flown long hall trains n the flying pencil ? It’s a passenger nightmare - the 757 is something like 6 or 7” narrower than the A320 for the same number of passengers across the two aisles. Horrible experience, truly horrible.
Sounds great
Smart boss😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Nothing better than to sit on an 11 hour flight in a single aisle aircraft with 222 in a 2 class configuration!
Exactly. Trash airline with trash, woke, business model.
No lie being a test pilot seems so fun. When else are you going to be able to do steep climbs steep turns test for stalls and maximum altitudes and performance. Gotta be the best job in the world
Bigger is better A321 next plane of the Generation ✈Sydney Australia
Great!
If they get the A330 then I'm gonna feel cool because I just guessed the new Airbus in United's fleet
the 330 is a phenomenal failure in engineering
@@leebenjamin5790 Exactly!
The 777x isn’t their next choice because it’s never going to enter service
United is looking at the WORLD, not just the United States! Certified pilots on aircraft lool like the key to this mixture. Flying an Airbus is different than flying Boeing!
UA also flies the 757 from Denver to Kona in Hawaii. Outbound UA 1758 & inbound 1731. It’s also Polaris equipped aircraft. Did the route this month.
Good Airbus is vastly superior to Boeing.
A few years ago, I flew United from San Francisco to Tokyo in Premium Economy. I was impressed.
Have you tried with United again?
That's ironically strange that's finally Airbus giving reason to Boeing concerning the battle between "hub to hub" vs "point to point". Boeing didn't replace 747 arguing it's not necessary because market will prefer little planes vs jumbo to doing point to point travels. Finally 321xlr is the best choice to be sure to fill a route point to point and 777x will be the biggest plane available on the market...if Boeing is able to put it on the market one day.
Horrible experience on United out of SFO from the gate agents on October 18, 2024, Dulles flight. Done with United.
Good content - id subscribe if the AI narration goes away
Or if he knew what he was talking about!
Thanks for your support!
@@FLIGAVIA Don't spew bullshit that isn't true!
And there’s many more who don’t really care whether it’s a Boeing jet.
After A380 King A350 Queen now 321 Prince of sky ✈Sydney Australia
It’s an approach up until Airbus has a major issue.
Cycles run in aviation and Airbus is no exception.
Or Airbus continues to develop single pilot abilities and then UAL pilot list shrinks. Now this isn’t happening immediately, but reality tells us cockpits went from five person crew to now two. One and zero will come one day; which day that happens is the big question.
People tell me they’d never get into a plane with no pilot. Statistically 8 in 10 accidents (80%) are caused by humans.
Boeing will never again compete with Airbus unless Boeing uses Palantir.
All parts made in USA?
Maybe yes or no. There is an Airbus plant in Mobile, Alabama. Capitalism would dictate that an airline choose the best widget so if Airbus makes a better plane then that's no different than England choosing a Boeing aircraft over an Airbus.
So long, United. Boeing is manufactured in the US.
A321XLR compared with a 787/777 - you know nothing - the real comparison is the A350 vs. 777 and 787 - Christ!
Yeah, this is pretty nonsensical.
Knee personally if I was going to Europe, I would not fly in narrow bought aircraft. I would use airlines that have widebodied. Yeah it’s saving the airline money, but the passengers comfort is declined.
So I thought similar but tried JetBlue to Heathrow on an A321 and I was impressed.
Well other airlines especially CO did it starting in the 90's. The big destinations are always served by widebodies. They only use narrow bodies to places like TFE and AGP. In those cases, be happy it's on a nonstop. That's the whole point.
i found out united are makig a concorde in 2026
I enjoyed 757 and E175 and now A330 & A321. B747 was Also great..loss.
A380 is king 350 Queen and 321 is princes of sky ✈Sydney Australia
Umm... It's a lease deal. 24-27..
They have over 400 Boeing aircraft on order so this is clearly nonsense
@GordonL-tr2zu yeah but what type?
@@yossal2608 150 787’s and 329 737’s
Not to mention the deliveries of 787’s with expansion orders and not one A350
757 is a baller plane, they just need to re-engine it and update the existing design with 787 style wings and lighter air frame with composites. Just bring back the 757 call its the 757X IDK
777x has too many seats for some destinations and would be losing money because they couldn't fill the majority of the seats. A smaller aircraft that has fewer seats but a similar range would be suitable because you can fill all or the majority of the seats per flight.
If Boeing was smart, they would try to negotiate a deal with Airbus so that they could produce the A320 series under license. It would help out Boeing tremendously.
Ha. Like Airbus would want Boeing to assemble their airplanes.
U do know that they won’t be able to do that right?
I don't hope I will be flying with you, as I can see I may land in places, most people have other definitions for ;-D LOL
Boeing management hates its labor force. It’s dying.
Why is everyone leaving Boeing?😢
theyre not
@@nickolliver3021 oh
I’m just mad because everyone is keep simping on Airbus
@@GavinEditz4059 It is not simping, it is called making choices. Since the stop of the production of the 757/767 Boeing hasn't competed in the medium-range market. And the only suitable and reliable aircraft manufacturer for medium-haul aircraft is Airbus with its A321XLR.Of course it is sad that the Boeing 757/767 are being retired, but efficiency is a really an important matter nowadays.
Everyone is not leaving Boeing as soon as you claim. In fact Delta and United have orders for the 737 MAX…and others in between
The 797 will beat the a321neo XLR in the future
Hope so.
@@FLIGAVIAexcept they will be late to the party and Airbus will have the majority market share. By the time a 797 is delivered those 321s will be 10 years old. Who is going to wait that long
I'm sorry, there is NO WAY you are Cramming me on ANY Single aisle Jet for 10 or 11 hours, People forget about deep vein thrombosis, on single aisle there is no where to go to walk or stretch, this increases your risk of DVT. Now Don't even think about the galley the flight attendants will eat you alive and tell you to take your seat. SIngle aisle are great for short hops (up to 5 hours) So I only fly Wide body (Twin Aisle) Abroad.
Yes, well narrowbodies are for routes that can't take widebodies. It won't be an issue unless you are going to AGP or TFE.
By By United!
4:37
There is no order from United for the A350-900. Looking at other comments, your report lacks seriousness and facts.
If I remember correctly United has an order for 45 A350-900s however the deliveries have been deferred multiple times. Don’t think they’d receive them until the 2030s
@@Espo97734 No, that's not the case.
Utterly bullshit AI-generated (and badly so) clickbait.
These videos drive me insane, I'm not sure why I am bothering to comment. But there is no operations connection between a321xlr and 777x. Why mention them together as potential competing strategies?
There are so many varieties like kids in a candy store . Pax choose comfort. CEO believe in saving money. Thats hard to combine. The railroad tracks never meet. Converge,?
エアバスを高評価するならばボーイングはじめ他社と比較して他社のネガティヴキャンペーンをすべきでない
Airliners could be more flexible on routes if additional external fuel tanks can be hooked on wing pylons such as on military aircraft. So why are air transport companies not using this method? Will be much cheaper than buying different a.c. variants just to cope with longer haul routes.
Because the drag would be outrageous.
@@BobbyGeneric145 Not really. It would be less than a bigger wide body a.c with bigger engines and more fuel consumption
UNITED AIRLINES SHOULD ALSO ORDER 100 B 787 - 9 .
Isn't there an ongoing problem with quality assembly issues.., with the Boeing 787? I'd think an aircraft operator would want to see these alleged issues solved before committing to purchasing this model of aircraft?
@@aubreydrinkwater3236 The problems with 787 are under control. yes a slow output but they're still delivering 787-10s at the moment
They have!
United should use the best aircraft for their fleet, that’s the a321 xlr and a350-900.
@@Notthecobracommander airbus sucks. It is noisy and uncomfortable. I will take a 777 900 any day when visiting family in China
@zhaolaogong Ha ha you are correct the boeing is quieter right now as it does not even fly as it has not been certified. You can wait for it while I fly on whatever is available, prefer the a350-900 and 1000.
@@zhaolaogongon the contrary. Airbus is much quieter compared to Boeing. 777 is one of the noisiest cabins.
@@kumark214 nope. I was on an Airbus and 10 minutes into the flight I wanted off and I am a marine corps veteran.
And I said goodbye to united
Why?
Because Boeing>
Bad english. Route is not rout.
Both are valid. Like schedule.
That's a 757
After 2 million miles, I just said goodbye to UNITED. There is a good reason for that! I can tell you why most US airlines don't like the A3211 and it is very simple. They like the twin bogey landing gear on the B757 and Airbus stubbornly won't move away from single.
No - 757 are dirt cheap for the airline as the debt they took to buy them has almost completely been paid off - but at the cost of lower efficiency. Nothing to do with MLG bogies - all the airlines care about is the bottom line.
More wheels/tyres = more cost = airlines unhappy = your argument debunked
UAL is slowing down pilot hiring because Boeing is not able to deliver new aircrafts on schedule. UAL and Boeing have gone overboard with DEI hiring.
When you hire people because of their sexual preference over their ability to produce good job performance, you are asking for trouble. This is paramount in aviation. In the end you must have the ability to do the job well!
oh for fucksakes.
United and Boeing is like hilter and stalin, both awful groups
You lost me with the terrible ai narration. Buy a freaking microphone and put in some effort...
I won't be flying United then. As bad as the new accountants running Boeing have allowed them to get, the basic airframes of their aircraft are better than Airbus, and most of the major air crashes in the last 40-50 years have been AIrbus aircraft. from flawed pitot tubes, to bad sensors, to design problems. The issues with Boeing are software, and lazy union workers that aren't being watched like they used to be. Example: the 737 is the most widely used aircraft in the world and one of, if not the most used commercial jet in history. If it was basically that bad, it wouldn't be. I've worked on them and they're a great airframe. The new Max version shows that you can try to take shortcuts and ruin something great. But Airbus is flawed from the beginning. Heck, the French invented the word sabotage! Plus of course, the more the U.S. fleet become reliant on FOREIGN suppliers, then the less control we'll have over our own destiny. If we have a dispute with the EU or any European entity, they can then shut down parts, supplies, support, etc., then what is United (or any other U.S. based carrier) going to do?
very insightful analysis! thank you!
Bit of a silly comment., 737's alone have had more crashes than all Airbus aircraft combined. But the Airlines have pretty much the same safety record overall. Speaks like a petty American child not getting their own way and throwing all their toys out the window.
@@FLIGAVIA tell me how it is insightful? It is a petty comment that makes no sense. Ignores Boeing incidents ocer the past 6/7 years and goes directly to a crash almost 20 years ago.
@@AllyD565 Not really, As a former USAF crew chef who was certified on over 16 different aircraft from 737 to SR-71's is NOT silly, its real world EXPERIENCE. The airframe and construction of these planes are far superior to Airbus. I can walk up to any of them and have done a visual that I find WAY more issues than most airlines want to admit. But the crashes that have happened for 737 have been from lack of maintenance and other human errors, from pilot to ground crew. Not pitot tube failures, landing gear issues, windows failure etc. Southwest flies737 almost exclusively and I was able to solve an issue with the aircraft that was keeping it grounded that the ground crew couldn't find. That's not the first time this has happened either. The training or lack thereof for many ground crews in civilian airlines can take a good solid plane and add problems. Mostly because the airlines are more concerned with flight hours than safety. But Airbus is more concerned with many things other than a solid design. Once a bad design is made, you can't correct for it. It's inherent. Like the old Lockheed L-1011 vs the DC-10. I've worked on both and the DC-10's are still flying because of this reason. While the L-1011's are out in the deserts collecting dust. Same place that many Airbus aircraft should be. Right now SOFTWARE and poor build quality because of bad management is the problem for the 737 and Boeing in general
R.I.P. BOEING !!! XD
United should really clean up their act and properly treat their passengers. United, an airline I personally would avoid where I can.
You lost me when attempting to compare the 321 to the 777X......in short, they DONT. This is fairly obvious, would you say???? Bye bye!
Airbus sucks.
United will lose me as a customer, because I REFUSE to fly on Airbutt aircraft.
Learn to spell young man.
Your thought patterns must be illogical or alternatively, you could be myopic and need to visit an optician.
That's your problem
Obviously doesn’t fly, why don’t you go and fly on a max
@@richardwarner1373 Bang!
Send all the information you can 🛩️🛸🛬✈️🚀🚁