I recently started using my G9 again after getting Sony A7IV. I like the lighter lenses. A7IV is amazing, but the weight of telephoto lenses is more than I thought.
yeah, the weight of lenses is definitely a difference. my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 for the sony is heavier than the equivalent Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 on my G9. but then again depending on the use case, i might need the depth of field provided by the sigma.
Interesting. I’m one of those who think that Panasonic will introduce PDAF/ hybrid AF in the updated S series and it will flow down from those to other lines. A hypothetical: if the G9 had AF as good as the Sony, would you still feel the move to FF would be worth it?
![Best Mirrorless Cameras 2024 [don’t buy one before watching this]](/img/n.gif)
I recently started using my G9 again after getting Sony A7IV. I like the lighter lenses. A7IV is amazing, but the weight of telephoto lenses is more than I thought.
yeah, the weight of lenses is definitely a difference. my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 for the sony is heavier than the equivalent Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 on my G9. but then again depending on the use case, i might need the depth of field provided by the sigma.
Great video. I got the a7iv as well but can’t let go of my G9
You meant to say sensor is 1/4 size, not half.
Would have loved to know the difference of iso performance since it's something I'm very looking for !
But thanks for the video anywa
Interesting. I’m one of those who think that Panasonic will introduce PDAF/ hybrid AF in the updated S series and it will flow down from those to other lines.
A hypothetical: if the G9 had AF as good as the Sony, would you still feel the move to FF would be worth it?