PRODUCTS USED IN THIS VIDEO: Fernco QuikCap: amzn.to/3UfMqdS -6AN Tee fitting (back of intake) amzn.to/3YbIjRk -8AN push lock fitting: amzn.to/4dSEUwj -8AN bulkhead fitting amzn.to/3NEbvv7 Lock nuts: amzn.to/3NxxILt TechFlex braided sleeving: amzn.to/3YwefkL LINK TO PREVIOUS CATCH CAN VIDEO: Oil Catch Cans: 101 - EVERYTHING you NEED to Know! th-cam.com/video/wX42ANVfbxE/w-d-xo.html
First thing i would say is that if your engine has so much crank pressure venting out of a vented catch can that it bothers you in the cab then you have a much larger problem than smelling it. I run a vented catch can under the hood of my 2014 camero ss with over 600 hp and i've never smelled anything in the cabin from the catch can.
I like the way you said "maybe 400 horsepower, nothing really crazy", I think that's a lot Mike! Remember back in the day, my favourite car was the '79 Trans Am 6.6. It had maybe 230 hp!!
@@sarblade Oh trust me I know… my last build WAS a 79 T/A with a 6.6 and I had to bore the block .030 over, mill the heads .050 use a thin cometic head gasket, did a cam, headers and I just barely squeezed 350hp out of it! But in the way of LS engines, they can make some crazy power for not a lot. Which makes mine pretty tame in comparison
Some people say that sealed is good for under boost, to help with crancase pressure since its constant or the turbo helps, and if you dont have a can between preturbo and pcv port oil will get suck into the turbo during boost, like the turbo will pull oil out or something. So im confused which to choose, vented or seal.
Is it different when working with an open system (has no valve). 2 ports on the valve cover connects to preturbo and throttle body (all together, the ports aren't seperated or the turbo and throttle body) 7mgte
Fantastic question dude! Fortunately the intake is still sucking the same 20 something pounds of vacuum regardless of if it’s scavenging PCV from the can or not, so it shouldn’t have any effect at all on the power brakes. Really good question!
I have always ran the line into the intake tube or airbox. Maybe if you notice any deference in your brake pedal a restrictor on that line may help. Had a mg in my shop and the sealed catch can was on intake vacuum and it was pulling the single lip cam seal in and making a weird noise.
PRODUCTS USED IN THIS VIDEO:
Fernco QuikCap:
amzn.to/3UfMqdS
-6AN Tee fitting (back of intake)
amzn.to/3YbIjRk
-8AN push lock fitting:
amzn.to/4dSEUwj
-8AN bulkhead fitting
amzn.to/3NEbvv7
Lock nuts:
amzn.to/3NxxILt
TechFlex braided sleeving:
amzn.to/3YwefkL
LINK TO PREVIOUS CATCH CAN VIDEO:
Oil Catch Cans: 101 - EVERYTHING you NEED to Know!
th-cam.com/video/wX42ANVfbxE/w-d-xo.html
I LIKE IT!!!
REMOVE THE STEAM & KEEP IT CLEAN
I’m installing a catch can for a 2002 5.3 going into a 1987 El Camino for my brother’s car.
Oh yeah? Hey thats a cool build! Always had a soft spot for that era of elcos, but was never a fan of the old TBI engines. Now he’s solved that!
First thing i would say is that if your engine has so much crank pressure venting out of a vented catch can that it bothers you in the cab then you have a much larger problem than smelling it. I run a vented catch can under the hood of my 2014 camero ss with over 600 hp and i've never smelled anything in the cabin from the catch can.
@@paulhunter1735 Did you watch the whole video?
I like the way you said "maybe 400 horsepower, nothing really crazy", I think that's a lot Mike! Remember back in the day, my favourite car was the '79 Trans Am 6.6. It had maybe 230 hp!!
@@sarblade Oh trust me I know… my last build WAS a 79 T/A with a 6.6 and I had to bore the block .030 over, mill the heads .050 use a thin cometic head gasket, did a cam, headers and I just barely squeezed 350hp out of it! But in the way of LS engines, they can make some crazy power for not a lot. Which makes mine pretty tame in comparison
@@intheshoptv Totally! Those 400's were pretty thin to work with. Too bad you weren't on TH-cam with the T/A build!
It dies look really good the way you ran it. Real clean look.
@@GrandPitoVic thank you bud. Knowing me, I’ll probably change it back n forth 100 more times lol
@@intheshoptv ROFLMFAO!!!!! Yea were too much alike in that aspect
Great information thank you.
Thank YOU for watching!
I am definitely running a sealed unit on my Vic. I've heard about the fumes (smell) coming into the cabin.
Yeah I STILL cant decide, but I love how this is reversible in like a minute flat
@@intheshoptv true lol
I dont know, I kind of like the choo-choo effect on that old truck!
🤔hmmm want to help me fabricate and weld up a locomotive smokestack for the hood???
Some people say that sealed is good for under boost, to help with crancase pressure since its constant or the turbo helps, and if you dont have a can between preturbo and pcv port oil will get suck into the turbo during boost, like the turbo will pull oil out or something. So im confused which to choose, vented or seal.
Is it different when working with an open system (has no valve). 2 ports on the valve cover connects to preturbo and throttle body (all together, the ports aren't seperated or the turbo and throttle body) 7mgte
@@toxicwolfgaming2972 With the excesses crankcase pressure created by boost, IMO - vented just makes the most sense.
@intheshoptv right, it has a road draft tube so the engine regulates the pressure so I think it swaps the flow to either intake and turbo
Can using the same vacuum port on the intake have a negative effect on your brake booster?
Fantastic question dude! Fortunately the intake is still sucking the same 20 something pounds of vacuum regardless of if it’s scavenging PCV from the can or not, so it shouldn’t have any effect at all on the power brakes. Really good question!
I have always ran the line into the intake tube or airbox.
Maybe if you notice any deference in your brake pedal a restrictor on that line may help.
Had a mg in my shop and the sealed catch can was on intake vacuum and it was pulling the single lip cam seal in and making a weird noise.