We Have Never Been Modern - Bruno Latour

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ค. 2023
  • Pills and Erik celebrate Latour Day. Cracking one of our old favs (amzn.to/3O2fLVp), to discuss the theory island chain, the scheme of actor network theory, and why reality is more complex than theoretical models.
    All our episodes are up at / plasticpills

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @ageofbumfires5216
    @ageofbumfires5216 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gordian Knot lol.
    An episode following the thought experiment of 1:04:00 would be pretty neat I think.

  • @ludviglidstrom6924
    @ludviglidstrom6924 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Welcome to the “We’re clueless about science” podcast! How does magnets work?

    • @Toxoplasmosic
      @Toxoplasmosic 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's the missing electrons, clearly

  • @g.aathoz1211
    @g.aathoz1211 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aah an examination and presentation of linguistic sophistry...

  • @dingleburryjoe9437
    @dingleburryjoe9437 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I also live on BC, you do any reasing groups or just patreon?

  • @hugolevasseur3324
    @hugolevasseur3324 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    please do an episode on OOO!

  • @Ruairitrick
    @Ruairitrick 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Christ this was tedious. As it was presented here, one could reasonably think Latour's project is to encourage pedantry

  • @ianwalker6054
    @ianwalker6054 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    god Eric's voice is ngl trés sxc

  • @ludviglidstrom6924
    @ludviglidstrom6924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don’t know, but I’ve never understood why people who are into continental philosophy seem to have such a big problem with the concept of “the thing in itself”. I have never read Kant and doesn’t know anything about his philosophy, but to me this concept is absolutely obvious. Yes, the only thing we have direct unmediated access to is our own consciousness, and the external world has to be accessed indirectly through our senses. There’s no way getting around this no matter how much one tries. I don’t see the problem here, but all the continental people seem to think this is some kind of heresy. The same thing with Descartes and “I think, therefore I am”, which is a totally obvious fact that no reasonable person could ever doubt, but for some reason this is now considered controversial or wrong or something. The whole attitude seems very irrational to me. And on the opposite side, among scientists and analytical philosophers, you have these insane people who think that consciousness is an illusion! Just nonsense and irrationalism going around everywhere.

    • @givepeaceachance940
      @givepeaceachance940 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well, I think if anything seems obvious, it bears questioning, no? Perhaps something about our unconscious biases seem to lead us to that conclusion. For instance, “I think, therefore, I am” to me is completely irrational, as being and thinking are two completely different things. You can be braindead and exist, for one thing. Unless you count consciousness as existence, which I don’t

    • @JHimminy
      @JHimminy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Many things I used to feel were obvious and unquestionable I no longer do.

    • @MAAEEULAZ
      @MAAEEULAZ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “I have never read Kant and don’t know anything about philosophy”

  • @JohnEpto-ng6ml
    @JohnEpto-ng6ml 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1

  • @ludviglidstrom6924
    @ludviglidstrom6924 ปีที่แล้ว

    Neil deGrasse Tyson is an actual scientist.

  • @christopherellis2663
    @christopherellis2663 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Enough blather. TB has been around for at least 9000 years.. the earliest written record is 3300 years old. The disease affects the bones, and that is how it is recognised in mummies. Arguing from ignorance is worthless.

    • @fede2
      @fede2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Way to miss the point.