honestly this was dumb. for someone to at all think a mountain is a tree is beyond stupid. hey look that mountain has trees on it. must be a 1000 trees growing out of a bigger tree oh wait if the mountain is a tree then those must all be branches what a joke
Quite ignorant how you can generalize these theorists on simply implying that "All mountains are tree stumps!!!" 🙄 Some theorists that I've seen talk about this topic do take time and use a more scientific classification method before classifying random mountains as tree stumps.
These "stumps" are lava tubes that the outer part has crumbled away and the lava tube is left. I have been up close and personal with the "devil's tower". It's obviously a lava tube.
Imagine if we live in a forest of trees that were that big. We could hollow them out and make apartments and set up all manner of bridges and different ways to get from tree to tree. Helicopters would make a lot of sense for the common person. In my mind I see a great opportunity to write a movie script about some world where trees were actually that big.
This is the most extreme view of the theory. The version I heard was that SOME mountains were once towering trees. I didn't hear anything about no such thing as rocks and past nuclear war.
If petrified trees exist (which they do), it's entirely possible that ancient giant trees trees are all petrified now instead of wood. Agates are solidified lava, all lava turns to stone when they make contact with water. And yet, volcanic earth is the most fertile soil of all.
I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Volcanic soil contains many minerals. We know exactly why it's so fertile. It has nothing to do with mountains being trees.
@@vespaman101 They're making a comparison. How liquid lava can turn to solid stone. Meaning it's not entirely impossible for trees to turn to stone which it's not it does happen.
Petrified wood can be stone-like, so that bit make at least a small bit of sense. Still a fascinating idea, could they have partially gotten the idea from the legend of Yggdrasil?
Modern civilization has been around 10 thousand years, but a heartbeat on a planet 4.5 billion years old. The academics are ridiculous to believe they know ANYTHING about the real ancient history of this planet from examining a periodic table of elements. You are a moron if you believe that intelligent life or monstrous trees couldn’t have existed on this planet a billion years ago if it’s here now. Our brains are too small to even hold all the data of shit about this planet we’ll never know….
A LOT of trees are more closely related to grass (palm trees) and even broccoli(forget the genus) , and the theory isn’t that ALL mountains are petrified trees it’s specific structures are maybe some people take it to that extreme but if you keep it in the realm of possibility it is an interesting theory
Remember how early ( Feb 2020) covid fear propagandists painted all lockdown/ social distancing/ mass masking skeptics as " they say the virus doesn't even exist!"? Same idea.
I can believe that trees existed with 10-20 metre diameters, which is still enormous, but a mile long diameter is incomprehensible and too absurd to give the benefit of the doubt
I think it’s certainly possible. If you google mountains some of them definitely appear like hacked off tree stumps. Remember creatures on earth used to be huge as well. It only makes sense that the plant life was also huge. Why would only the animals develop to into massive creatures. The nutrient rich environment must have affected every living organism in some way. Just a thought 💖🙏🏻🫶🏻✌🏻
It's odd that this documentary makes it seem impossible that trees could be these mountains. One of the reasons he uses is because of the composition. And another comment I just posted underneath this one I point out how petrified wood can turn into things like quartz or magnesium and coal which is what you also find if you were to go looking for those materials.
Very true, Joni. This video tries to tie in the Flat Earth theory with this giant tree theory, without any relevant facts to back him up. We can observe that the world is not flat. We can also observe there are massive coal beds etc. made up of trees.
@@earlysda hahahaha, lol, we can also observe that the earth is not round...but you guys like to forget about that and put all your faith in your own observation. That aint science, I hate to break it to ya. You are following a religion.
@@SometimesTurtle Turtle, Just a video a few minutes ago that showed where some Flat-Earthers accidentally gave more evidence that the earth is round. . I've seen the curvature of the earth.
Glad to see this story isn't lost in the mainstream. I saw the original video before it was taken down along with a huge selection of fringe/conspiracy theories. It was quite entertaining :). But more aggravating is the patronising censorship of this content and we are slipping on this anti free speech slope one cancellation at a time.
Thank you. I was wondering what happened to the original video showing organic hexagonal patterns and comparisons of organic material. This is an empty oversimplification. Also it’s patronizing and clearly made for clickbate and nothing else. Censorship, in a nutshell
@@randomxaos sorry but that channel is bunk. He doesn't even know what protons and electrons are. He calls them black particles and white particles. He even insists he was corresponding with the Russians... The guy may have started out with something interesting but it looks like he lost his marbles.
He's trying to debunk and ridicule the theory by extrapolating it to say ALL mountains were once trees. That is NOT what the original video postulated at all. It only pointed out that certain unusual mountain formations like Devil's tower could be petrified tree stumps. One thing I do know is that we have no clue as to the real history of this planet. We have been lied to for thousands of years.
I like to entertain crazy ideas, but there's a difference between granite and the minerals that come from petramineralization. Therefore the idea that all mountains were trees is truly... wrong. But I would like to further entertain the possibility that some "mountains" are these legendary trees and would like to see serious scientific research about it for sure. Sand is made of a lot of quartz and silica, there's the correlation, because thats the minerals from petramineralization of trees.
The key to what you said is "half buried metal tanks" In order to achieve pertafication the thing needs to be buried. That's why all fossils are buried. We don't find fossils that are exposed to the elements for thousands of years.. If they weren't buried, they can't become fossils nor petrified. They decompose and even bones are disintegrated. If a tree was that tall and never fell, it was never buried, therefore it cannot become petrified. The "tree" in the thumbnail, for example, does it look like it was ever buried? How could it have become petrified?
Look at the findings of hangman1128 he traveled to all of the mountains in America and created a 1 hour video of several years of research and findings.
@@cidguy once one sees Hangman1128 film work it’s undeniable that the mountains were once giant trees. Once ya know ya can’t go back. The deception of this realm we live in can be overwhelming.
Watched the original "no trees on earth" video and was captivated by it such that I returned to it several times. the original video was like a somehow incredibly soothing fairytale.
do you mean the one made by a guy with a really heavy accent? i used to comfort watch that too, if its the same one. it would give me ASMR hits, even tho i thought ge was talking nonsense lol ☻
The way this video explains the theory it's obvious they don't want people thinking mountains could actually be ancient trees. They even goes as far to say TH-cam has removed videos that compares mountains to tree stumps. That is not true. There are many videos on youtube comparing not only rocks to tree-stumps but many different life forms that resemble ancient life. I recommend doing your own research in my opinion this video is trying to hide the truth by making the theory sound absolutely ridiculous. It's time to wake up
We’ve seen that some trees can hold a massive amount of water. What if some of the major bodies of water were formed when the mega trees were cut down?
This is in the Iroquois Story of creation: The great lakes were formed when Atlantiens turned cruel and cut down the tree of life (or one of them). The story does not use the word atlantien but instead has another words almost like "Gagans" or somethings similar to the word giants or ancient tartarians. There is a white bowl, almost in perfect circle of limestone formation around three of the great lakes that the Iroquois story of creation states is manmade atlantean cement that suffocated and encased the tree of life. The great lakes were formed around the great flood time of 12,000 years ago. The iroquois story of the ending of the third world and the white spiderlike-substance that was suffocating the tree of life is geologically accurate as the bowl of white limestone in impermeable. The fact that it's a perfect circle of white limestone dried to be impermeable is just so resonant with the native american stories.
@@rhondavann9608 they must been super scary wonder if the ancient people had any special weapons that we dont know anything about that kept them from attacking people you know before the flood there was alot lost of technology even after the flood some was destroyed by wars.
Have to admit, this sounds like a fascinating backdrop to put your characters and stories on. I can imagine tree stumps as large as mountains, each having their own unique ecosystems and/or settlements that thrives by extracting the tree's "woods", and each of these "tree communities" can trade or make war with each other. For additional drama we can have one sole remaining "world tree" that still in a quite pristine condition, and everyone in the world is racing to stake a claim on it.
It all stems from jack and the beanstalk. Fairy tale. But, what if that bean stalk that went up into the sky was actually a incredibly large tree that produced great amounts of oxygen. Then, once the trees were chopped or taken down and died, oxygen was depleted and now we have smaller creatures running around. Of course, this all stems from giants too. But that is just fantasy, right?
I have a tree that was cut down in my yard and after about 7 years and some vegetation that has grown over it-it definitely looks like a tiny mountain! I’m not sure about all of our mountains being trees once but it is quite possible if you open your mind. The fact that we are losing our freedom to speak our views and theories and the control of the great G search factor and the powers that B is the sad part!
What do "modern humans" do with trees, since we stopped being simple animals? We cut down the biggest trees that we see for the most profit (profit not sole in a capitalistic point of view, but also in a materialistic point of view). If there have been any ancient civilization before the ice ages, maybe they did the same. If every new generation did cut the biggest trees of their time, the outcome would be a degeneration of the forests size/height. Nowadays most trees never reach their full age (is there even something like that for big trees?). They get cut down after a certain time for the maximum profit. I also like the theory the big forest fire theory as well, since giant trees would mean a very high oxygen concentration in the air. And maybe earth had even more air volume with trees that big. Easily to be set on fire. A single lighting could be enough if a certain concentrations of oxygen is in the air.
He also said, "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance". Yes those are trees. Yes the earth is stationary and flat with a firmament dome.
I'd say the mountain you used in the thumbnail could be argued as the tree of life depicted in ancient texts. It's rock formations are hexagonal and tree cells are hexagonal. I'm not saying I believe it but thatd be there best bet for a better argument
There are waaaaaaaaay bigger ones around the world, especially asia and the middle east. Australia too. The mesas of the southwest are nothing in comparison.
This goes against the things I was taught, so I'm going to just assume I have all the answers and shit on anyone else with opposing ideas. Thanks moonshine, your the role model we desperately need.
According to flat earthers there no such thing as a round earth, no such thing as dinosaurs, no such thing as space, and now there’s no such thing as rocks? The thing that the entire planet is made of?! An miseducated imagination is wild.
I heard "thoery" so many times it almost gave me an aneurysm. A concecpt that nobody can agree on, and is thoroughly unsupported by conventional science, as you describe, is exact opposite of a theory
I would go with the flood theory or the nuclear theory just because history repeats it self. Also... If giants were walking the earth in those days , then respectfully that would back up the great flood written in the scriptures, for the great flood was sent to destroy the giants & all wickedness. Nuclear would also explain how little men defeated "the giants" & would also explain alternatively the great crater that they claim wiped out the dinosaurs.
Earth was round with giant trees until it made a joke about Jada pinkett's bald head saying "unlike me, she can't even grow a bush" Causing Will Smith to smack it so hard, it turned flat.
There were surely some very big trees and plants in the history of the planet I beleive. They were untuched so they could be alive for long time and grow large in some areas.
Well it is a known fact that when trees live for an elongated time there outer bark starts to turn to stone or petrified carbon So some mountains around the world that look like a tree stumps so it would make sense that some of the mountains we know today could have been the largest forest in the world
In 1961 my family went on a cross-country trip of the USA and we visited the “petrified forest”. It consisted of giant felled”trees”. They were “frozen” in concentric rings with beautiful quartz. Does this forest still exist?
I will withold specificities because you should think for yourselves and not simply accept what you are told. I was climbing, and scrambled upon a flat surface. But it was not flat; it had a slight curvature. The surface was about 25 feet wide and 60 feet long. As I bushed away the moss and debris, the surface revealed itself. It was one solid piece of petrified wood. It was obvious that this was only a splinter of what had once been. I could not fathom the size nor the age of the tree of which this had once been a part. And only a mere fragment. I do not pretend to know, but I know that things are not as they appear.
Interesting that the original video (which I watched, by the way, and was quite well-done) proposing the idea that certain (some) mountain formations are the remains of gigantic tree stumps, interesting that it was removed from the internet. Given this, one should stop and think: Why would such a video be banned, censored, unless the party doing so felt threatened somehow? Is the free exchange of ideas, here, so threatening that the concept had to be 'obliterated' from cyberspace? What could possibly account for such an uncalled-for extreme action (clearly violating the highly respected, at least formerly so, concept of 'free inquiry' and free speech)? For those people who truly are mature, independent, free thinkers (a very desirable psychological state), they would not reject such an idea outright, but be willing to look into the matter more deeply. Further, though this video asserts there is no credible evidence to support this theory, the author(s) does not attempt to substantiate its viewpoint, really, other than to ridicule and belittle. How shallow! Without saying one way or the other as to the validity of this theory, I would heartily suggest for any individual who might be interested to pursue further serious, conscientious inquiry. I will say at the outset that it will take some 'digging', but having done so, that individual might be greatly surprised as to what they may find. "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy (world view)." Shakespeare's Hamlet
@KamiEuKiTo It wasn't just the video it was the whole guys channel, JhonXArmy was it called, he uploaded all kinds of what you would call conspiracy idea's, video's of him where removed time by time without any notification or given reason which we like to call "beeing shadow banned", and in the end his channel was deleted due to so called 'hate speech' which there was non of to be found. and what mack sais is true , this guy does not attempt to substantiate its viewpoint, really, other than to ridicule and belittle.the whole idea, if you would saw the video for yourself and all his other video's linked to this subject you would atleast question it a bit more..
Simple, the herd believes that looking for counter-narrative information on the internet is stupid. They actually say things such as, "Watching a TH-cam video isn't research". No joke. The herd appeal to authority and disbelieve anyone, even PhD scientists such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, because they are terrified of having to change their mind. The herd prefer popularity, online or offline, over uncomfortable truths. The tolerant, diverse crowd will mock, shame, berate anyone who had the courage to step off the plantation. Even the fence sitters and voices of reason are slightly discouraged from speaking up. There was a Christian on a flat earth 'debunk' video. He commented that he was Christian, but still believed in globular earth. His own globe earth peers descended like a pack of hyenas in the comments to ridicule his belief in Jesus. So I pointed that out to him in the comments. Told him that Christians who believe in flat earth won't ridicule his beliefs, even if we should disagree. One of the biggest hurdles for truth is the desire for love. Men have to compete much harder than women to succeed at love. Throughout history around half of men weren't able to pass along their genes. Most men believe whatever prevents them from losing the affections of women. Now the herd believes man can become woman and vice versa.
In ancient times when oxygen levels were higher there was giant everything so why does this seem so strange? Not every mountain but yeah sure. You got dinosaur bones left over and the trees of there day. Some of those trees may have rotted away but some could have petrified.
The idea that mountains are actually trees is beyond idiotic. Anyone with even a basic understanding of science would realise that. Higher oxygen levels alone can't produce trees that big, or any life that big. Mass is a thing, gravity can't just change locally either. When you upscale anything, you quadruple the mass of that object.
According to ancient Vedic legends there are trees miles high and miles wide. However, this was usually put forward as some kind of Cosmic reality. Otherwise, these ancient Vedic legends also suggest that trees and people were much more gigantic in very ancient times. The Dinosaur were sometimes gigantic and apparently feeding on gigantic vegetation. Thank you for sharing informative videos!
Well, now, an interesting suggestion I have heard is that, trees hold water, for instance, the cedar trees can hold water in their trunks, when one is an older tree, it can hold hundreds of litres, and when this puddles around the base of a cut down tree, it form's a rather large puddle or small pool. What would a giant silicone tree hold, that were hundreds of miles high and miles wide at the base. Do trees still continue to artisan, water from deep underground, and these are the rivers that flow from the mountains???
Devils tower was what woke me. If you look closely it has square columns the resemble plant fibers. The reason they give us is absolute bs. The mental gymnastics/ dodging required to belueve that is astounding. It literally still has the green facia fibers on it. Devils Den was in fact a plant of some sort likely a silicon tree. In no other instance does lava flow in such a way as to mimick plant fibers. All the flat tops have visible root systems.
If you aren't a flat earther yet, it's going to blow your mind when it happens! Be prepared to lose the affections of family, friends and society at large. Flat earth is the number one most hated conspiracy theory in existence because it cannot deny God's existence. Giant human and animal mud fossils was something I believed before flat earth. From there it wasn't difficult to transition over. An effective life hack is to disbelieve practically every academic narrative. Even professional sports are rigged. Referees don Masonic, dualistic black and white apparel. The Houston Astro cheating scandal was the eye opener. The commission did not revoke Houston's ill-gotten win.
Petrified wood is stone or stone like isn't it? So, how is the mountains are giant tree stumps theory so farfetched? It's a shame how mainstream narratives have the minds of most people incapable of opening up to other possibilities. It must be difficult for those who have taken authority as truth rather than truth as authority ~Massey~
@Matt Mann Did I beg somewhere here for likes or to come and view my channel or videos? No. Besides, who tf are you to even say I've to prove myself...
@@publicfreakoutcringe1918 Some people are strange. Only thing I can think of is this dude is thirsty over your pic or something. Still a weird comment. This is the internet. You could have a Flying Spaghetti Monster pfp and obviously not be the FSM irl, lol.
She's not going to sleep with you just for coming to her defense, lol. What @matt said is plausible, even if @public is a woman. Personally I do not care one way or the other, as I'm not the profile police. The strategy of using a woman's picture to get more likes would in fact work.@@DocHolliday1851
Honestly I think it is entirely plausible for some of these flat-topped mountains to have been trees. Not all mountains, obviously, but some of them are somewhat suspicious. We know that there were giant mushrooms and giant flowers and giant dragonflies, so why would it be such a reach to believe that there were massive trees as well? I definitely think it is worth researching...and the fact that TH-cam removed it should be more than enough to convince you to look deeper into it, since they leave up all sorts of ridiculous theories and remove this one. There must be truth in there somewhere.
I know right. This guy is mocking theorists and is completely brushing over the small minority then actually take time and you scientific methods before classifying such collusions.
Scientists from Wyoming State Parks Department conducted photographic seismic readings below the tower, they discovered an incredibly large, petrified root system below the tower. They released a statement saying, "We have discovered, what looks like a giant root system stemming from the base of The Devils Tower.
Do you have any way to link or find that statement by WY State Parks? Or are you just gaslighting? I already feel confident there were giant trees, but I'd love to see an official statement on it.
Maybe the trees were cut down to put the dome here. Trees that size wouldn't decay like normal trees. They would have to be hard as stone or even harder while they were alive to support the height and weight of them. The trees were probably too high to place the dome sense the 1958 encyclopedia mentioned that the edge of the dome in Antarctica was around 13,000 ft high. So here it would probably be about 70 miles tall. And the trees wouldn't fit in it. All over the world ancient text talk about the trees that reached the heavens. I believe it holds truth. I used to be skeptical like you until I researched everything I could about it. The oxygen level would have been much higher then. Maybe 90% oxygen. So everything would have been massive. But I also believe the dinosaurs were creatures before the dome. Creatures from the old world. There's also a theory saying they may have all been sea creatures. It would make sense. Side note we burn through millions of drums of oil each year. Something big had to put that much there
You missed the massively important differentiation between the colloquial theory, a guess or idea, and a Scientific Theory, the explanation of natural processes backed up by all current known evidence.
There are PhDs who are germ theory skeptics, flat earthers, you name it. Occam's razor, those are definitely petrified trees. Rock samples from large humanesque formations were analyzed and found to contain human DNA. The education system is designed to educate away our critical faculties. There's at least two education systems: One for us, one for upper echelons. Their children are taught esoteric knowledge. Academia tells us man can become woman, lol! Why should we believe anything else they tell us to believe?
Petrification takes 5 to 10 thousand years at its quickest under the best of circumstances. The erosion of the resulting stone, an additional long time. If there were trees miles across, miles high ANY civilization would take centuries to use their energy. If they fell, they would leave behind petrified trails miles long. Where are the furnaces that burned the trees? Where is the further evidence of petrified wood? It should be EASY to find.
You're not using the same reality as believers in giant trees. Humans and animals were also much larger. A 6'7" person like me would be dwarfed by the ancients. There's even books on Amazon about the topic - 'Genesis 6 Giants Master Builders of Prehistoric and Ancient Civilizations'
That time only changed in the last 100 years in Baltimore City. What was once an area where Cromwell built a Long Bridge in the King's Forest with trees of enormous size with fresh water springs running beneath them became storage facilities for Rockefeller Oil and toxic waterways. Today known as Baltimore City. We should spend time focusing on who created "Shape" of conditions, instead of the conditions which create the "Shape"
Many were cut down pre flood according to the book of Enoch. The rest were broke down by the immense force of the debris from a global flood that lasted for over a year.
It's a manipulation tactic meant to discourage people from learning what giant tree believers have to say. Flat earth is the number one most hated conspiracy theory because a flat, stationary earth with a firmament would be proof of God's existence. Don't get that by chance.
I saw these trees in a dream when I was a kid... They were bigger than a city and most of them had fruit... It appeared to me that the earth had a huge bush wrapped around it like the rings of Saturn... 💯
Obviously this is a theory and a really neat one at that, but you never know what’s really possible within our universe. Who knows, their may actually be a giant planet completely in covered sand with or without the help of giant sandworms like in DUNE.
@@BloodMoodEnergy yea most of the other aliens are probably so advanced they left this dimension. Even though theirs no evidence of anything outside the universe but I like to keep an open mind.
The giant tree theory has nothing to do with believing the flat earth theory. First of all, it doesn't prove the flat earth. But some mountains do look like giant trees. Just because i believe one thing doesnt mean i believe the other. It's because video's like this that people think that i believe in flat erath theory just because i believe that its possible that some mountains used to be giant trees..
I believe the worlds atmosphere (sky) was diffrent. That it had a protective layer that allowed giant growth. Giant people. Then for some reason that layer faild and fell to earth causing the great flood.
I remember the first book I ever read, and I read it over and over again, and 45 yrs on, I still want to live in a hollowed out oak, on my side of the mountain... 🤔😊. Ahhhh the memories
The Devils Monument look like a tree trunk from above, and The Giants Causeway does have the same hexagonal shapes. Interesting theory. Too bad the video is no longer up because it had many interesting pictures of mountains and treestumps side by side which was very convincing to this theory. Some mountains could be fossilized trees..
If TH-cam removes something for misinfo, the theory is probably correct. A lot of flat earth videos were scrubbed. The were replaced with 'authoritative' sources.
Has anyone ever witnessed lava forming hexagonal formations in real time? (No). I'm not a flat earther, but there's too much real evidence that this WAS a reality.
I am always interested in outside of the box theories but this is just silly. There is ample explanation for things like mountains and proof that the earth is not flat. People need to educate themselves. I rate this with conspiracy theories.
Petrified wood found in the park and the surrounding region is made up of almost solid quartz. Each piece is like a giant crystal, often sparkling in the sunlight as if covered by glitter. The rainbow of colors is produced by impurities in the quartz, such as iron, carbon, and manganese.
The thumbnail pic is a leftover vocanic cindercone that was very high in silicone content. It is pure feldspar, which has a hexagonal crystal structure
I think about the red wood giant sequoia trees in California where I used to live. These trees are MASSIVE! Some are up to 40 feet in diameter at the trunk and stand over 260 feet tall
This is where things get conflated (probably deliberately). I don't believe anyone said that "all mountains are trees." However, there are certain mountainous struco, such as plateau's, that definitely resemble trees.
At one time the Earth had a canopy of water vapor surrounding it which made life bigger and longer lived. No doubt that giant trees helped create that canopy.
Obviously, the brainchild of this idea must have watched "Avatar" (2009) where the trees on the planet Pandora were as big and high as mountains in many scenes. An interesting idea nevertheless.
My hometown is Weehawken NJ. The name comes from the indigenous people there on and near the Palisades on the Hudson River. 'The rocks that look like trees'.
Dear Aliens: Please take the flat earth people and show them earth from space and circle the planet a few times and educate them. Then dump them out the air lock. Sincerely: NORMAL PE😆PLE.
Mountains are formed by a few different things. Water plays a role for example. I watched a documentary about how the Grand Canyon was formed and it's soo interesting! The Grand Canyon has been under water about 6 times before.
Never heard that claim before today! Unlike the herd, I won't mock and ridicule your belief. Instead I will use a search engine to learn more info about your belief. Also unlike the herd, I won't be swayed by 'fact check' articles stating that your belief is incorrect. It's my job to hear as much information as possible before coming to a decision. @@Charles1830
What's your verdict on this alternate theory? Subscribe for more from Unveiled ► wmojo.com/unveiled-subscribe
Just as laughable as flat earth theory lol
honestly this was dumb. for someone to at all think a mountain is a tree is beyond stupid. hey look that mountain has trees on it. must be a 1000 trees growing out of a bigger tree oh wait if the mountain is a tree then those must all be branches what a joke
Quite ignorant how you can generalize these theorists on simply implying that "All mountains are tree stumps!!!" 🙄
Some theorists that I've seen talk about this topic do take time and use a more scientific classification method before classifying random mountains as tree stumps.
These "stumps" are lava tubes that the outer part has crumbled away and the lava tube is left. I have been up close and personal with the "devil's tower". It's obviously a lava tube.
Subscribe to yet another pointless waste of time? NO!
Imagine if we live in a forest of trees that were that big. We could hollow them out and make apartments and set up all manner of bridges and different ways to get from tree to tree. Helicopters would make a lot of sense for the common person. In my mind I see a great opportunity to write a movie script about some world where trees were actually that big.
Maybe once we did live in that world. And the very cutting of those trees resulted, ultimately, to the world that you now find yourself in...
What are you? ? ?
An Ewok ? ? ?
Yeubna
Zip lines… makes a lot of sense too.
very cool idea man
sorry alan dean foster pip and flix books
This is the most extreme view of the theory. The version I heard was that SOME mountains were once towering trees. I didn't hear anything about no such thing as rocks and past nuclear war.
Yeah I debate these people often and this was the first time I ever heard the claim that every rock was once a tree.
Same, dude.
You're right. This dummy is trying to capitalize off conspiracies
@@randomxaos No I have heard from many promoting the extreme version of this story
hangman1128 channel goes into detail on this and the evidence is overwhelming.
Why would they remove a video about ancient trees if they aren’t trying to hide something????
Either that or Wikipedia banner, lol. Almost everything has been a lie.
If petrified trees exist (which they do), it's entirely possible that ancient giant trees trees are all petrified now instead of wood. Agates are solidified lava, all lava turns to stone when they make contact with water. And yet, volcanic earth is the most fertile soil of all.
I'm not sure what you're trying to get at. Volcanic soil contains many minerals. We know exactly why it's so fertile. It has nothing to do with mountains being trees.
My theory he talking about
@@vespaman101 They're making a comparison. How liquid lava can turn to solid stone. Meaning it's not entirely impossible for trees to turn to stone which it's not it does happen.
Nicely done!
Agates can form in volcanic rock but not because the lava.
Petrified wood can be stone-like, so that bit make at least a small bit of sense. Still a fascinating idea, could they have partially gotten the idea from the legend of Yggdrasil?
Their theory: "bc it looks like a tree stump, it must be a tree stump"..
@@einienj3281 what's that saying... Looks like a duck quacks like a duck 🦆
@@mikebar42 Mountains are not trees....
@@einienj3281 quack 🦆 🥴
@@mikebar42 These theorists are quacks... 👍🏻
One thing I’ve learned in life is that there is a little bit of truth in all stories.
There is ZERO truth in mountains used to be trees.. None whatsoever
I've learned that the MSM truth pushed today are 90% exposed as lies tomorrow.
You are pretty gullible if you believe that.
Modern civilization has been around 10 thousand years, but a heartbeat on a planet 4.5 billion years old. The academics are ridiculous to believe they know ANYTHING about the real ancient history of this planet from examining a periodic table of elements. You are a moron if you believe that intelligent life or monstrous trees couldn’t have existed on this planet a billion years ago if it’s here now. Our brains are too small to even hold all the data of shit about this planet we’ll never know….
Anyone who claims to be 100% certain of anything is a fool.
A LOT of trees are more closely related to grass (palm trees) and even broccoli(forget the genus) , and the theory isn’t that ALL mountains are petrified trees it’s specific structures are maybe some people take it to that extreme but if you keep it in the realm of possibility it is an interesting theory
Remember how early ( Feb 2020) covid fear propagandists painted all lockdown/ social distancing/ mass masking skeptics as " they say the virus doesn't even exist!"?
Same idea.
I can believe that trees existed with 10-20 metre diameters, which is still enormous, but a mile long diameter is incomprehensible and too absurd to give the benefit of the doubt
@@theunholybanana4745
Well, let me just tell you that, you have no idea what’s incomprehensible and absurd.
I think it’s certainly possible. If you google mountains some of them definitely appear like hacked off tree stumps. Remember creatures on earth used to be huge as well. It only makes sense that the plant life was also huge. Why would only the animals develop to into massive creatures. The nutrient rich environment must have affected every living organism in some way. Just a thought 💖🙏🏻🫶🏻✌🏻
It's odd that this documentary makes it seem impossible that trees could be these mountains. One of the reasons he uses is because of the composition. And another comment I just posted underneath this one I point out how petrified wood can turn into things like quartz or magnesium and coal which is what you also find if you were to go looking for those materials.
Very true, Joni. This video tries to tie in the Flat Earth theory with this giant tree theory, without any relevant facts to back him up. We can observe that the world is not flat. We can also observe there are massive coal beds etc. made up of trees.
@@earlysda hahahaha, lol, we can also observe that the earth is not round...but you guys like to forget about that and put all your faith in your own observation. That aint science, I hate to break it to ya. You are following a religion.
@@SometimesTurtle Turtle, Just a video a few minutes ago that showed where some Flat-Earthers accidentally gave more evidence that the earth is round.
.
I've seen the curvature of the earth.
Indeed
They even have pictures in the early 1800s late 1700s where they are cutting down those massive trees makes you wonder
@@rltome YES! Look at the pic of the biggest horse! If it’s not twice as tall as the men, you are looking at the wrong pic!
Not every mountain obviously but theres def a few of these giant tree stumps around the world
It's feldspar bro. Complete with heaxgonal crystal structure when you get up close
No.... there isn't lol
No
is the earth flat too cameron?
Absolutely not, lol.
Glad to see this story isn't lost in the mainstream. I saw the original video before it was taken down along with a huge selection of fringe/conspiracy theories. It was quite entertaining :). But more aggravating is the patronising censorship of this content and we are slipping on this anti free speech slope one cancellation at a time.
Just spreading some sensored truth, hangman1128 is a good one
Thank you. I was wondering what happened to the original video showing organic hexagonal patterns and comparisons of organic material. This is an empty oversimplification. Also it’s patronizing and clearly made for clickbate and nothing else. Censorship, in a nutshell
Yes, utoob is really good at censorship.
Same
I was wondering what happened to these videos of giant trees tree stumps are everywhere on the planet if you know where to look
A very easy way to investigate this theory would be to simply look at the roots. If these were really trees they would have massive roots
A guy at mudfossil university had DNA samples tested and actually proved it
@@randomxaos lol no he didnt...
@@randomxaos sorry but that channel is bunk. He doesn't even know what protons and electrons are. He calls them black particles and white particles. He even insists he was corresponding with the Russians... The guy may have started out with something interesting but it looks like he lost his marbles.
@@my2cents49 obviously white particles are positive and black is negative . It’s not rocket science
digging miles deep just to do this?
He's trying to debunk and ridicule the theory by extrapolating it to say ALL mountains were once trees. That is NOT what the original video postulated at all. It only pointed out that certain unusual mountain formations like Devil's tower could be petrified tree stumps. One thing I do know is that we have no clue as to the real history of this planet. We have been lied to for thousands of years.
"Hey! That looks like a tree."
"It must be a tree."
Flat earth logic
Lol!
Around . and you will see 40 mile long branches covering about 1/2 of the island
"Pareidolia".
Never underestimate the stupidity of a schizophrenic basement dweller
I like to entertain crazy ideas, but there's a difference between granite and the minerals that come from petramineralization. Therefore the idea that all mountains were trees is truly... wrong. But I would like to further entertain the possibility that some "mountains" are these legendary trees and would like to see serious scientific research about it for sure. Sand is made of a lot of quartz and silica, there's the correlation, because thats the minerals from petramineralization of trees.
The key to what you said is "half buried metal tanks"
In order to achieve pertafication the thing needs to be buried. That's why all fossils are buried. We don't find fossils that are exposed to the elements for thousands of years.. If they weren't buried, they can't become fossils nor petrified. They decompose and even bones are disintegrated. If a tree was that tall and never fell, it was never buried, therefore it cannot become petrified. The "tree" in the thumbnail, for example, does it look like it was ever buried? How could it have become petrified?
Yeah I kind of figured this video would'nt be worth watching because of the caption. But I watched it anyways :/
This would lead me to thinking beaches were one forests more than assuming mountains might be giant trees
Look at the findings of hangman1128 he traveled to all of the mountains in America and created a 1 hour video of several years of research and findings.
@@cidguy once one sees Hangman1128 film work it’s undeniable that the mountains were once giant trees. Once ya know ya can’t go back. The deception of this realm we live in can be overwhelming.
Watched the original "no trees on earth" video and was captivated by it such that I returned to it several times. the original video was like a somehow incredibly soothing fairytale.
do you mean the one made by a guy with a really heavy accent? i used to comfort watch that too, if its the same one. it would give me ASMR hits, even tho i thought ge was talking nonsense lol ☻
@@horseheadkid why do you say 'comfort watch'? what exactly do you mean and why did you think he was talking nonsense?
Where will I be able to see this video
Where can I find it?
The way this video explains the theory it's obvious they don't want people thinking mountains could actually be ancient trees. They even goes as far to say TH-cam has removed videos that compares mountains to tree stumps. That is not true. There are many videos on youtube comparing not only rocks to tree-stumps but many different life forms that resemble ancient life. I recommend doing your own research in my opinion this video is trying to hide the truth by making the theory sound absolutely ridiculous. It's time to wake up
Yeah these are deliberately intended to play down plausible theories. Whoever runs the channel is a GovCUCK
Agreed.
We’ve seen that some trees can hold a massive amount of water. What if some of the major bodies of water were formed when the mega trees were cut down?
This is in the Iroquois Story of creation: The great lakes were formed when Atlantiens turned cruel and cut down the tree of life (or one of them). The story does not use the word atlantien but instead has another words almost like "Gagans" or somethings similar to the word giants or ancient tartarians. There is a white bowl, almost in perfect circle of limestone formation around three of the great lakes that the Iroquois story of creation states is manmade atlantean cement that suffocated and encased the tree of life. The great lakes were formed around the great flood time of 12,000 years ago. The iroquois story of the ending of the third world and the white spiderlike-substance that was suffocating the tree of life is geologically accurate as the bowl of white limestone in impermeable. The fact that it's a perfect circle of white limestone dried to be impermeable is just so resonant with the native american stories.
Good thinking
@@matriarchalprayerproject link to the lore
Wow
couldn't imagine a tree that tall of 15miles in the air it would be breath taking to see.
And you couldn't have imagined prehistoric animals either
@@rhondavann9608 they must been super scary wonder if the ancient people had any special weapons that we dont know anything about that kept them from attacking people you know before the flood there was alot lost of technology even after the flood some was destroyed by wars.
I think it would be very breath giving, as it's a giant tree
@@kristyandesouza5980 Best comment
@@aeixo2533 why, thanks
Have to admit, this sounds like a fascinating backdrop to put your characters and stories on.
I can imagine tree stumps as large as mountains, each having their own unique ecosystems and/or settlements that thrives by extracting the tree's "woods", and each of these "tree communities" can trade or make war with each other. For additional drama we can have one sole remaining "world tree" that still in a quite pristine condition, and everyone in the world is racing to stake a claim on it.
Hmmm sounds a bit like "avatar". Just a little bit.
It all stems from jack and the beanstalk. Fairy tale. But, what if that bean stalk that went up into the sky was actually a incredibly large tree that produced great amounts of oxygen. Then, once the trees were chopped or taken down and died, oxygen was depleted and now we have smaller creatures running around. Of course, this all stems from giants too. But that is just fantasy, right?
I have a tree that was cut down in my yard and after about 7 years and some vegetation that has grown over it-it definitely looks like a tiny mountain! I’m not sure about all of our mountains being trees once but it is quite possible if you open your mind. The fact that we are losing our freedom to speak our views and theories and the control of the great G search factor and the powers that B is the sad part!
Go to hangman1128 TH-cam channel.
Probably you'll find Stellium7 interesting as well.
You're welcome.
What do "modern humans" do with trees, since we stopped being simple animals?
We cut down the biggest trees that we see for the most profit (profit not sole in a capitalistic point of view, but also in a materialistic point of view).
If there have been any ancient civilization before the ice ages, maybe they did the same.
If every new generation did cut the biggest trees of their time, the outcome would be a degeneration of the forests size/height.
Nowadays most trees never reach their full age (is there even something like that for big trees?). They get cut down after a certain time for the maximum profit.
I also like the theory the big forest fire theory as well, since giant trees would mean a very high oxygen concentration in the air. And maybe earth had even more air volume with trees that big. Easily to be set on fire. A single lighting could be enough if a certain concentrations of oxygen is in the air.
@@JTomas96 yesss. He shows it quite well
I mean, how stupid can people be? As Einstein once said - the only difference between genius and stupidity is that the former has it’s limits
I not going to listen to a man that stole credit from someone else's technology!!!
People can be immensely dumb
He also said, "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance".
Yes those are trees. Yes the earth is stationary and flat with a firmament dome.
Einstein also stated that: "the only thing truly infinite is human stupidity"...
So was he genius or stupid for saying “Imagination is more important than knowledge”?
I'd say the mountain you used in the thumbnail could be argued as the tree of life depicted in ancient texts. It's rock formations are hexagonal and tree cells are hexagonal. I'm not saying I believe it but thatd be there best bet for a better argument
Or... it's definitely feldspar with heagonal crystal structure 🤷♂️
@@jeffclarkofclarklesparkle3103 lol I didn't say it was a fully solid argument still fun to wonder about though 🤣
There are waaaaaaaaay bigger ones around the world, especially asia and the middle east. Australia too. The mesas of the southwest are nothing in comparison.
Look up baigong pipes and those were once tree roots. It looks similar to devils tower how it’s formed.
The tree of life that is cut down and is now a mountain, is located in the center of the north pole :)
They probably believe that Jack and the Beanstalk is really based off of actual events. Lol
Except. According to Peter Pan, Jack and the beanstalk actually happened.
WHAT?? You didn't believe that?
That's were stories like that come from..
Yes good possibility
This goes against the things I was taught, so I'm going to just assume I have all the answers and shit on anyone else with opposing ideas. Thanks moonshine, your the role model we desperately need.
According to flat earthers there no such thing as a round earth, no such thing as dinosaurs, no such thing as space, and now there’s no such thing as rocks? The thing that the entire planet is made of?!
An miseducated imagination is wild.
“Petrified” and “Mud Flood” missing from narration to bind the theory.
I heard "thoery" so many times it almost gave me an aneurysm. A concecpt that nobody can agree on, and is thoroughly unsupported by conventional science, as you describe, is exact opposite of a theory
I would go with the flood theory
or the nuclear theory
just because history repeats it self.
Also...
If giants were walking the earth
in those days ,
then respectfully that would back up
the great flood written in the scriptures,
for the great flood was sent to
destroy the giants & all wickedness.
Nuclear would also explain
how little men defeated "the giants"
& would also explain alternatively
the great crater that they claim
wiped out the dinosaurs.
Earth was round with giant trees until it made a joke about Jada pinkett's bald head saying "unlike me, she can't even grow a bush"
Causing Will Smith to smack it so hard, it turned flat.
There were surely some very big trees and plants in the history of the planet I beleive. They were untuched so they could be alive for long time and grow large in some areas.
Well it is a known fact that when trees live for an elongated time there outer bark starts to turn to stone or petrified carbon
So some mountains around the world that look like a tree stumps so it would make sense that some of the mountains we know today could have been the largest forest in the world
In 1961 my family went on a cross-country trip of the USA and we visited the “petrified forest”. It consisted of giant felled”trees”. They were “frozen” in concentric rings with beautiful quartz. Does this forest still exist?
Yes, it still exists. I've never seen it myself, but it's quite famous.
9:15 harry- look at the buns on that
9:20 lloyd- yeah, he must work out lol
I always looked at mountains as broken tree stumps......and imagine how tall they would have been.....
@@mondrianeuselol you probably still do
I will withold specificities because you should think for yourselves and not simply accept what you are told. I was climbing, and scrambled upon a flat surface. But it was not flat; it had a slight curvature. The surface was about 25 feet wide and 60 feet long. As I bushed away the moss and debris, the surface revealed itself. It was one solid piece of petrified wood. It was obvious that this was only a splinter of what had once been. I could not fathom the size nor the age of the tree of which this had once been a part. And only a mere fragment. I do not pretend to know, but I know that things are not as they appear.
Interesting that the original video (which I watched, by the way, and was quite well-done) proposing the idea that certain (some) mountain formations are the remains of gigantic tree stumps, interesting that it was removed from the internet. Given this, one should stop and think: Why would such a video be banned, censored, unless the party doing so felt threatened somehow? Is the free exchange of ideas, here, so threatening that the concept had to be 'obliterated' from cyberspace? What could possibly account for such an uncalled-for extreme action (clearly violating the highly respected, at least formerly so, concept of 'free inquiry' and free speech)? For those people who truly are mature, independent, free thinkers (a very desirable psychological state), they would not reject such an idea outright, but be willing to look into the matter more deeply. Further, though this video asserts there is no credible evidence to support this theory, the author(s) does not attempt to substantiate its viewpoint, really, other than to ridicule and belittle. How shallow! Without saying one way or the other as to the validity of this theory, I would heartily suggest for any individual who might be interested to pursue further serious, conscientious inquiry. I will say at the outset that it will take some 'digging', but having done so, that individual might be greatly surprised as to what they may find. "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy (world view)." Shakespeare's Hamlet
@KamiEuKiTo Ha Ha Ha!
@KamiEuKiTo It wasn't just the video it was the whole guys channel, JhonXArmy was it called, he uploaded all kinds of what you would call conspiracy idea's, video's of him where removed time by time without any notification or given reason which we like to call "beeing shadow banned", and in the end his channel was deleted due to so called 'hate speech' which there was non of to be found. and what mack sais is true , this guy does not attempt to substantiate its viewpoint, really, other than to ridicule and belittle.the whole idea, if you would saw the video for yourself and all his other video's linked to this subject you would atleast question it a bit more..
Very well said! Agree totally.
Simple, the herd believes that looking for counter-narrative information on the internet is stupid. They actually say things such as, "Watching a TH-cam video isn't research". No joke. The herd appeal to authority and disbelieve anyone, even PhD scientists such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, because they are terrified of having to change their mind. The herd prefer popularity, online or offline, over uncomfortable truths. The tolerant, diverse crowd will mock, shame, berate anyone who had the courage to step off the plantation. Even the fence sitters and voices of reason are slightly discouraged from speaking up. There was a Christian on a flat earth 'debunk' video. He commented that he was Christian, but still believed in globular earth. His own globe earth peers descended like a pack of hyenas in the comments to ridicule his belief in Jesus. So I pointed that out to him in the comments. Told him that Christians who believe in flat earth won't ridicule his beliefs, even if we should disagree. One of the biggest hurdles for truth is the desire for love. Men have to compete much harder than women to succeed at love. Throughout history around half of men weren't able to pass along their genes. Most men believe whatever prevents them from losing the affections of women. Now the herd believes man can become woman and vice versa.
In ancient times when oxygen levels were higher there was giant everything so why does this seem so strange? Not every mountain but yeah sure. You got dinosaur bones left over and the trees of there day. Some of those trees may have rotted away but some could have petrified.
Maybe gravity was different back then.
The idea that mountains are actually trees is beyond idiotic. Anyone with even a basic understanding of science would realise that.
Higher oxygen levels alone can't produce trees that big, or any life that big. Mass is a thing, gravity can't just change locally either.
When you upscale anything, you quadruple the mass of that object.
So explane the redwoods than .@anonymouscandle1223
According to ancient Vedic legends there are trees miles high and miles wide. However, this was usually put forward as some kind of Cosmic reality.
Otherwise, these ancient Vedic legends also suggest that trees and people were much more gigantic in very ancient times.
The Dinosaur were sometimes gigantic and apparently feeding on gigantic vegetation.
Thank you for sharing informative videos!
The giant trees must have existed during dinosaurs time, if big animals like dinosaurs exist why not trees, right?
Well, now, an interesting suggestion I have heard is that, trees hold water, for instance, the cedar trees can hold water in their trunks, when one is an older tree, it can hold hundreds of litres, and when this puddles around the base of a cut down tree, it form's a rather large puddle or small pool. What would a giant silicone tree hold, that were hundreds of miles high and miles wide at the base. Do trees still continue to artisan, water from deep underground, and these are the rivers that flow from the mountains???
Makes sense
Ah yes, let's just casually chop down every single horrifically tall and multiple mile wide ganttt tree on earth.
A man approached me in El Dorado Canyon, outside Boulder, CO, pointing out the cliffs were trees. I could actually visualize it…
The validity of tree theory would require the debunking of cratons & tectonic plates. Good luck with that.
Devils tower was what woke me. If you look closely it has square columns the resemble plant fibers. The reason they give us is absolute bs. The mental gymnastics/ dodging required to belueve that is astounding. It literally still has the green facia fibers on it. Devils Den was in fact a plant of some sort likely a silicon tree. In no other instance does lava flow in such a way as to mimick plant fibers. All the flat tops have visible root systems.
If you aren't a flat earther yet, it's going to blow your mind when it happens! Be prepared to lose the affections of family, friends and society at large. Flat earth is the number one most hated conspiracy theory in existence because it cannot deny God's existence. Giant human and animal mud fossils was something I believed before flat earth. From there it wasn't difficult to transition over. An effective life hack is to disbelieve practically every academic narrative. Even professional sports are rigged. Referees don Masonic, dualistic black and white apparel. The Houston Astro cheating scandal was the eye opener. The commission did not revoke Houston's ill-gotten win.
You also get a gold in mental gymnastics!
@@JB-1138 That wasn't an argument. Try rebutting.
Petrified wood is stone or stone like isn't it? So, how is the mountains are giant tree stumps theory so farfetched? It's a shame how mainstream narratives have the minds of most people incapable of opening up to other possibilities.
It must be difficult for those who have taken authority as truth rather than truth as authority
~Massey~
It's not that impossible to imagen "trees" of that size... BUT I don't believe they are the mountains today as "leftovers"...
@Matt Mann Did I beg somewhere here for likes or to come and view my channel or videos? No.
Besides, who tf are you to even say I've to prove myself...
@@publicfreakoutcringe1918 Some people are strange. Only thing I can think of is this dude is thirsty over your pic or something. Still a weird comment. This is the internet. You could have a Flying Spaghetti Monster pfp and obviously not be the FSM irl, lol.
Not saying she's lying, but you did make me raise my eyebrows a bit. That would be an effective way to get more likes and replies. @@mattmann5620
She's not going to sleep with you just for coming to her defense, lol. What @matt said is plausible, even if @public is a woman. Personally I do not care one way or the other, as I'm not the profile police. The strategy of using a woman's picture to get more likes would in fact work.@@DocHolliday1851
Honestly I think it is entirely plausible for some of these flat-topped mountains to have been trees. Not all mountains, obviously, but some of them are somewhat suspicious. We know that there were giant mushrooms and giant flowers and giant dragonflies, so why would it be such a reach to believe that there were massive trees as well? I definitely think it is worth researching...and the fact that TH-cam removed it should be more than enough to convince you to look deeper into it, since they leave up all sorts of ridiculous theories and remove this one. There must be truth in there somewhere.
It's not plausible, at all, not even a little bit. They removed the video because it was 100% pure nonsensical garbage.
Lol
@@blueplanet... yeah I know, I'm ok with that
You failed to mention 'petrified' wood.
Quite a bit poking out in Arizona.
An ignorant proof of theory.
I know right.
This guy is mocking theorists and is completely brushing over the small minority then actually take time and you scientific methods before classifying such collusions.
Just a note to say that a ‘theory’ that ignores or contradicts *known* facts isn’t a theory at all…might make passable fiction, tho
Scientists from Wyoming State Parks Department conducted photographic seismic readings below the tower, they discovered an incredibly large, petrified root system below the tower. They released a statement saying, "We have discovered, what looks like a giant root system stemming from the base of The Devils Tower.
Do you have any way to link or find that statement by WY State Parks? Or are you just gaslighting? I already feel confident there were giant trees, but I'd love to see an official statement on it.
Sounds like a genuinely cool setting for a D&D campaign...or maybe they're just describing Endor.
Maybe the trees were cut down to put the dome here. Trees that size wouldn't decay like normal trees. They would have to be hard as stone or even harder while they were alive to support the height and weight of them. The trees were probably too high to place the dome sense the 1958 encyclopedia mentioned that the edge of the dome in Antarctica was around 13,000 ft high. So here it would probably be about 70 miles tall. And the trees wouldn't fit in it. All over the world ancient text talk about the trees that reached the heavens. I believe it holds truth. I used to be skeptical like you until I researched everything I could about it. The oxygen level would have been much higher then. Maybe 90% oxygen. So everything would have been massive. But I also believe the dinosaurs were creatures before the dome. Creatures from the old world. There's also a theory saying they may have all been sea creatures. It would make sense. Side note we burn through millions of drums of oil each year. Something big had to put that much there
You missed the massively important differentiation between the colloquial theory, a guess or idea, and a Scientific Theory, the explanation of natural processes backed up by all current known evidence.
Right?? Thank you; came here to say that he *really* shouldn't be referring to it as a "theory"; it's a completely-unsupported hypothesis at *best.*
Just goes to show what a crap vid this is. Yet another look at me look at me crap
There are PhDs who are germ theory skeptics, flat earthers, you name it. Occam's razor, those are definitely petrified trees. Rock samples from large humanesque formations were analyzed and found to contain human DNA. The education system is designed to educate away our critical faculties. There's at least two education systems: One for us, one for upper echelons. Their children are taught esoteric knowledge. Academia tells us man can become woman, lol! Why should we believe anything else they tell us to believe?
why did you mention flat earth here while it is unrelated?
The Nephilim cut the giant trees down. Think about it Jack and the Beanstalk
The earth holds many secrets, The Smithsonian holds many things. That scene in the original Indiana Jones of all the boxes in a warehouse is true
Petrification takes 5 to 10 thousand years at its quickest under the best of circumstances. The erosion of the resulting stone, an additional long time. If there were trees miles across, miles high ANY civilization would take centuries to use their energy. If they fell, they would leave behind petrified trails miles long. Where are the furnaces that burned the trees? Where is the further evidence of petrified wood? It should be EASY to find.
You're not using the same reality as believers in giant trees. Humans and animals were also much larger. A 6'7" person like me would be dwarfed by the ancients. There's even books on Amazon about the topic - 'Genesis 6 Giants Master Builders of Prehistoric and Ancient Civilizations'
That time only changed in the last 100 years in Baltimore City.
What was once an area where Cromwell built a Long Bridge in the King's Forest with trees of enormous size with fresh water springs running beneath them became storage facilities for Rockefeller Oil and toxic waterways. Today known as Baltimore City.
We should spend time focusing on who created "Shape" of conditions, instead of the conditions which create the "Shape"
What's next? Giant termites? Giant acorns forgotten by giant squirrels?
Many were cut down pre flood according to the book of Enoch. The rest were broke down by the immense force of the debris from a global flood that lasted for over a year.
My only problem with the narration was that it imposed or encouraged a link between flat earthers and giant trees.
It's a manipulation tactic meant to discourage people from learning what giant tree believers have to say. Flat earth is the number one most hated conspiracy theory because a flat, stationary earth with a firmament would be proof of God's existence. Don't get that by chance.
I saw these trees in a dream when I was a kid... They were bigger than a city and most of them had fruit... It appeared to me that the earth had a huge bush wrapped around it like the rings of Saturn... 💯
Obviously this is a theory and a really neat one at that, but you never know what’s really possible within our universe. Who knows, their may actually be a giant planet completely in covered sand with or without the help of giant sandworms like in DUNE.
What sucks is that compared to astronomical year’s humanity appeared pretty late. So our species missed a lot of stuff.
@@Lilskies12 Agreed, I could only image what strange (to us) planets roam the cosmos.
@@BloodMoodEnergy yea most of the other aliens are probably so advanced they left this dimension. Even though theirs no evidence of anything outside the universe but I like to keep an open mind.
yt godgevlamste if u want it
It's not a tree. It's a giant alligator's horn. Alligatorshad horns in the past. Zoom out on Google earth and you will see it. You can't miss it
It's the book "Land of Giants" then. Fascinating.
When I was very young I always thought of the mountains when I looked at trees very closely.
Your senses weren't lying then and they aren't lying now.
So... If the mountains are trees, wouldn't that make what we call trees today growing on mountains cannibals?
Plant eat dead grass.
Bushes
The giant tree theory has nothing to do with believing the flat earth theory. First of all, it doesn't prove the flat earth. But some mountains do look like giant trees. Just because i believe one thing doesnt mean i believe the other. It's because video's like this that people think that i believe in flat erath theory just because i believe that its possible that some mountains used to be giant trees..
I believe the worlds atmosphere (sky) was diffrent. That it had a protective layer that allowed giant growth. Giant people. Then for some reason that layer faild and fell to earth causing the great flood.
just when you thought we hit full dumb, they start digging.
I remember the first book I ever read, and I read it over and over again, and 45 yrs on, I still want to live in a hollowed out oak, on my side of the mountain... 🤔😊. Ahhhh the memories
I read that in jail lmao. Fun read
It's important to keep an open mind, just not so open that your brain falls out.
Lol
The Devils Monument look like a tree trunk from above, and The Giants Causeway does have the same hexagonal shapes. Interesting theory. Too bad the video is no longer up because it had many interesting pictures of mountains and treestumps side by side which was very convincing to this theory. Some mountains could be fossilized trees..
If TH-cam removes something for misinfo, the theory is probably correct. A lot of flat earth videos were scrubbed. The were replaced with 'authoritative' sources.
Well, apparently having had Titans on earth, now mountain ranges, it is plausible to have titanic sized trees here too!!
Awesome, volcanoes spew out molten trees. 🤔😆
How can a volcano create a hexagonal shape?
@@kaylahills3760 I was just thinking about volcanoes in general, I'm no geologist so I can't explain to you how the hexagonal shapes are formed. 😊
@@kaylahills3760 Let me try with a counter question, how would a tree create hexagons? 😉😊
Imagine Mount Everest tree 😱😱😱
Trees are plants 🌱 🏔 mountains are not plants lol
They aren't trees. You would need a continent sized chainsaw to do that kind of smooth clear-cutting LOL
Has anyone ever witnessed lava forming hexagonal formations in real time? (No). I'm not a flat earther, but there's too much real evidence that this WAS a reality.
Right...
That is something to really ponder on.
No because the root system would of been as deep as the tree was high
I believe in lost history, but this is way out there!
I am always interested in outside of the box theories but this is just silly. There is ample explanation for things like mountains and proof that the earth is not flat. People need to educate themselves. I rate this with conspiracy theories.
Petrified Wood is way out there?! I've heard crazier theories that make less sense at least this one uses natural phenomenons to explain it.
Look in John Levi pretty cool stuff
People that truely belive in this kind of thing and flat Earth really need help with there mental health. They have some major issues.
So...Just a thought...If this theory is accurate...would that mean that desert is just the saw dust from the ancient enormous trees...?????
I like that
notice the sand? these trees were silicon
ya ever seen petrified wood? ya naysayin' bahstahd!
They said it’s a “strange theory” not once did they say they believed it or that its true. Y’all need to calm down 😂
They said it's not true several times in the video.
Thank you ! Truth sometimes scares people back into there holes
want to have some fun ? yt petrified giants or instead godgevlamste
Nice to see another Godgevlamste subscriber here!@@dylankars8448
Not all mountains, but the devil’s tower in Wyoming is definitely a tree or plant stump from before the flood of Noah.
Petrified wood found in the park and the surrounding region is made up of almost solid quartz. Each piece is like a giant crystal, often sparkling in the sunlight as if covered by glitter. The rainbow of colors is produced by impurities in the quartz, such as iron, carbon, and manganese.
weren't we thought how mountains form back in 7th grade
Saying random stupid things isn't a theory. If I say hamsters are potatoes, I'm being dumb, not theorizing.
Write a blog, gather "facts" to support it and share it with enough people. You'll have others believing that very thing! It's sad really.
Exploring mud fossils is a fascinating and relatively unexplored area of science, true; but this one takes the cake.
The thumbnail pic is a leftover vocanic cindercone that was very high in silicone content. It is pure feldspar, which has a hexagonal crystal structure
Lol volcano
Ayyt that tree on the right at 00:18 better stop acting up
Imagine if trees COULD get that big though! Wouldn't they peak out of the atmosphere at that size?
I think about the red wood giant sequoia trees in California where I used to live. These trees are MASSIVE! Some are up to 40 feet in diameter at the trunk and stand over 260 feet tall
Good question. I am sure that they were a worldwide species at one time or another.
@Matt Mann They sure are amazing though.
@Matt Mann If you have never seen a giant Sequoia tree, I would recommend going and seeing one.
@@scottcupp8129 Why are you "sure that they were a worldwide species at one time or another"?
This is where things get conflated (probably deliberately). I don't believe anyone said that "all mountains are trees." However, there are certain mountainous struco, such as plateau's, that definitely resemble trees.
At one time the Earth had a canopy of water vapor surrounding it which made life bigger and longer lived.
No doubt that giant trees helped create that canopy.
Not trees this big though.
@@NachoDaMan Disagree. definitely trees this big.
@@krisl2838 All this is is basalt. It is a giant pillar of salt that vaguely looks like a tree stump.
@@NachoDaMan I think they would be absolutely huge. Have you seen the giant trees in British Columbia?
@@krisl2838 Not to much bigger than a redwood.
I wish I had the same drugs these ppl have. It has to be some strong stuff, cause this is ridiculous.
Obviously, the brainchild of this idea must have watched "Avatar" (2009) where the trees on the planet Pandora were as big and high as mountains in many scenes. An interesting idea nevertheless.
This idea has been with many Native American cultures for quite some time, before movies even existed.
Not too mention ancient Scriptures also stating so...
Rob said my thoughts best. These ideas predate modern science by around a millenia or so lol
My hometown is Weehawken NJ. The name comes from the indigenous people there on and near the Palisades on the Hudson River. 'The rocks that look like trees'.
The glasshouse mountains in Queensland Australia sorta look a bit like these
Dear Aliens:
Please take the flat earth people and show them earth from space and circle the planet a few times and educate them.
Then dump them out the air lock.
Sincerely: NORMAL PE😆PLE.
They'll make us believe paper is made from wood one of these days.
Mountains are formed by a few different things. Water plays a role for example. I watched a documentary about how the Grand Canyon was formed and it's soo interesting! The Grand Canyon has been under water about 6 times before.
It is the original Red Sea. That’s why it’s pyramids in the canyon itself. If it’s nothing to hide why can’t we go and explore it freely.
@@Charles1830Exactly early Nubian style history is there. We didn't came from no dang Africa
Never heard that claim before today! Unlike the herd, I won't mock and ridicule your belief. Instead I will use a search engine to learn more info about your belief. Also unlike the herd, I won't be swayed by 'fact check' articles stating that your belief is incorrect. It's my job to hear as much information as possible before coming to a decision. @@Charles1830