HOW MANY AIRCRAFT?!? British Reaction to 5 Reasons You Shouldn't Mess With The USA
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2024
- Today I'll be reacting to 5 Reasons Not To Mess With The USA!
If you somehow enjoyed the video be sure to Like/Subscribe.
(IT REALLY HELPS!) (❤️)
Any other suggestions of videos for me to watch in the near future?
Please write it down below so that I can check it out! (🎥)
Gaming Channel:
/ @splitgaming1 (🧐)
Original video:
• 5 Reasons You Shouldn'... (👈)
Time Stamps:
0:00 : Introduction
0:57 : Reaction
13:15 : Final Thoughts
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them.
#usa #us #reaction #military #navy #airforce - บันเทิง
The US has 406 nuclear missles but each missle carrys multiple warheads, up to 10. All of which can be independently targeted. That is just the Airforce. Navy submarines carry over 50% of all nuclear weapons. The Airforce also has nuclear bombers.
The US has a total of 5,800 nuclear weapons. Of those, roughly 1,800 are actively deployed. The rest are held in reserve and could be deployed very quickly.
The last time I checked the U.S. Air. Force's bombers were conventionally powered (ie. some form of petrol), not nuclear powered.
The US is the ONLY super power, not the largest. A "Superpower" is capable of fighting two wars in two different theatres and still be capable of winning BOTH. (winning is NEVER assured). Russia obviously cannot do this. China and India both lack force projection (their militaries are not capable of across ocean deployment). People have misused Super Power when they mean "Regional Power". China and especially India is concentrating on developing their "blue water" capabilities but are about 30-50 years behind the US.
3 wars
Also, The current minuteman upgrade package reduces the size of the warheads, instead of one big warhead, each ICBM has up to 6 that have individual guidance (we can hit 6 targets with one ICBM).
Keep in mind this is only what we are willing to show. And our stealth was developed in the 80s. We have way way better than this now. They just don’t show it. Also our drones are gigantic!
That ICBM number is not our total number of nukes. We actually have 5,400 in total. Also, critics often say our military is why we "don't have healthcare." That's not true. Other Western nations spend about 2.5% of their GDP on military whereas we spend around 3.2% -- a bit higher, certainly nothing to get into a twist over. Our military is simply massive because America is massive. 3.2% of damn near $30,000,000,000,000 adds up to an impregnable military force.
I’ve enjoyed finding your TH-cam channel. I saw your review of the F-22 “Raptor” and would be interested in your reaction to the F-35 A,B and C models. Thank you and take care.
Drones are now VERY effective and accurate, and are quite heavily used. Especially the Reaper drone, which has already taken out numerous enemy positions/equipment. Best bet: DON'T start a fight with the U.S.!
The US has at least 1800 nuclear warheads deployed and active. Each missle can carry up to 10 individual warheads, each of which can be independently targeted. The US also have thousands of nuclear weapons in storage should they be needed. Russia has at least as many, if not more.
13:58 The United States spent $766 billion on national defense during fiscal year (FY) 2022 according to the Office of Management and Budget, which amounted to 12 percent of federal spending.
That's 400 land base ,the navy carries 70% of the nuclear arsenal
Keep in mind if any country tried a land invasion of the US, the amount of armed private citizens would be an army of its own, on top of dealing with all the different branches of military. 👍
Go for it.
This video is from 2017 you ought to react to the video that is current. Everything mentioned has already been developed like the Gerald R Ford aircraft carrier is already in use. All they mentioned that was being developed has already been developed.
Just fyi the US operates 2 Gerald R. Ford carriers as far as I know of. Also check out "Just How Big is the US Military".
Well actually no the greatest numbers do not win the war. The greatest TECH wins the war, but it just so happens, all our equipment IS the greatest tech, and in addition to that, our numbers are overwhelmingly also the greatest and it's not even close. Consider military aircraft for example. The UK and France have between 500-700. America has 15,000! 700/15,000 ~= 4.67% lols. China is our only rival (not that any European country would be considered a rival but I just mean in terms of military power without consideration of international relations), and their entire economy is a function of ours.
This is just what the government talks about.
You should watch fat electrician US destroys Iran navy in 8 hours react to that he has a lot you will be a fan good luck with channel
listening to you hurts my head
You should react to the 6 reasons why you shouldn't mess with USA and also there. Cheap 5th Generation narchinakov's are much easier to detect and we. Have six generation aircraft you should also look at the fib twenty one raider
What are you talking about?
The USA has no military aircraft that's viable in today's world. 6th generation, you claim? LOL, tell us all about these 6th generation aircraft you claim the USA has today?
@@hotstepper887 The F21 raider, which is the new sixth Gen. Aircraft that the US has.
And the six reasons why you shouldn't mess with the u s a youtube video
@@user-zq3iy2em9j The USA has no 6th generation aircraft, just like everybody else, they're working on one. Then, when looking at Russia? The US is defenceless today. Clearly, you just know nothing about these aircraft, as nothing you've said is true, factual, or even real, but it's what's known as propaganda.
So can you explain why we see this, not only from you, but all of you?
@@user-zq3iy2em9j Why do we endlessly read you all endlessly claiming the F-22 is so much better than the Russian rubbish SU-57 (that uses washing machine chip technology)? LOL.
Only when you're asked what you've ever seen the F-22 actually do (that would allow you to make that claim) none of you can answer that, as in the 19 years the US has had the F-22 in service, you've never seen the F-22 do anything, (well, other than flying over a beach on a TH-cam Video).
So, even your own opinions, are based on absolutely nothing. So why do you all do this? What is it all about? What is it, any of you think you're achieving, talking endless reams of utter rubbish? You all only prove you know nothing at all.
We read you all going on and on about the RCS (radar cross-section) of the F-22, really thinking and believing it means something, when it means nothing. But because none of you actually know anything, we read you all talking about it, LOL.
It's so stupid, and in more ways than one, the first thing, being, that nobody knows the RCS of the F-22, F-35 or any other military aircraft, as for obvious reasons, they'll always be kept classified.
So all this, "the F-22's RCS means these aircraft can operate like they're invisible" is nothing more than utter rubbish that none of you could ever know. LOL.
And the second stupid thing, is, you never just ask the obvious, and the important questions?. Questions like, how do the F-22's or the F-35's for that matter, detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
None of you even know how that can be done. And yet, if you all had just asked yourselves that one question, you'd then maybe start to understand that today's reality is nothing at all like you people think!
Seemingly none of you even understand, that (stealth alone), defeats high-frequency, short wave radar, by absorption and deflection, but you must understand, it does not defeat low-frequency, long wave radar.
And what that means, is, that regardless of the aircraft's RCS (radar cross-section) you all believe means so much, when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and stand out, like a beacon in the night.
To detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
And neither the APG-77 radar, used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar, used in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR) - An obvious fact, the US Air force will be fully aware of.
Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, what do the F-22 - F-35, actually have available to them to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? They have AWACS (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35's in real time). Only, that's not possible today.
And this is why actually understanding your enemies real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
Because what you all claim is Russian crap, does have has a new 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. Seeing them able to detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR quite easily today.
Russia designed, and they developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This truth about this new Russian radar technology, with its very impressive range parameters, and its jamming ability over very large areas, make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types today.
But, it's just Russian rubbish. LMAO!
This Russian rubbish can detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, before they even reach Russian airspace, from much greater distances today, with "real-time" data from Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system.
The (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important huge Russian advantage in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
This radar design, has very clear, and very real capabilities to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including... Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. (Effectively, and completely, neutralising the USA's use of AWACS for their detection).
This Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with these radars.
-- Just Russian crap?, indeed it is! LMAO!
FAFO!!!
No added info . oooou ahhhh is not interesting to me.
Not everyone should be a TH-camr
turn up the video or turn down yourself u r way too loud
they dont have the parts, engineers, payload, logistics or pilots to operate their air force effectively, and no effective air defences to defend their airfields and carriers, on paper like the soviet air force in 1941 the USA air force looks impressive, but in realty it is a good combat arm of the US forces but not a game changer, and not something Russia or China would worry much about in a long term engagement.
Are you really naive enough to believe this?
@@AMSTAS No, the only question here can be, are you uneducated enough to "not know" this? So, rather than making such a meaningless comment, that says nothing, offers nothing, and is only backward, at best, why don't you now tell us, just what it is, you must believe?
You see, when you do understand the reality of the USA's military power today, it is only a horror story for them, and across every area of military power today. But clearly you don't believe this? So, why don't you tell us anything you believe the USA leads the world in, and in any area of the military you care to think about?
Surely, as you've just claimed someone as "naive" for pretty much, talking the real facts today, you must be able to tell us about anything you believe the USA leads the world in? Otherwise, why are you making that comment?
@@AMSTAS You clearly are
Whatever helps you sleep at night. There is more money, personnel, and equipment pumped into the US Air Force than whole other 1st nations entire GDP. But yeah, ignorance is an option too.
Can I ask a question here, that I'll get a reasonable answer, too? What I'd like to know, is, why I read so many Americans endlessly claiming the F-22 is so much better than the Russian rubbish, (that relies on washing machine chip technology)? LOL. Only why is it, that when you ask what they've ever seen the F-22 actually do, (that would then allow them to hold that opinion), they can't answer that? As they've never seen the F-22 do anything at all, ever. (well, other than flying over a beach on a TH-cam Video).
So, the truth is, they all just prove that their own opinions are opinions based on absolutely nothing. So, really, what is it all about? What do they think they could ever achieve by talking about things, their very own words only prove they know nothing about? And even worse, why don't they ever ask themselves the obvious questions? Questions like, how can the F-22 or F-35's for that matter, detect, track, or target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
You'll come to find, they have no idea! Yet, if they had just asked themselves that one question, they'd then start to understand that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think! I mean, seemingly none of them even understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
So regardless of the aircraft's RCS (radar cross-section), they all believe means so much, when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and just light up, and stand out, like a beacon in the night. To detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter, for targeting purposes.
Now, the facts are, that neither the APG-77 radar, used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar, used in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR)! - An obvious fact, the US Air force will be fully aware of.
Only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat! So, what do the F-22 or F-35, actually have available to them to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? They have AWACS (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35's in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding your enemies real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
The Irony is, these (Russian aircraft), they call rubbish, have a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR easily today. Russia have designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen.
They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types. But it's just Russian rubbish, LOL. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters from BVR, even before an enemy enters Russian airspace, but from much greater distances today, with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system. Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR. Seeing the all-important huge Russian advantage in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
This Russian 5th generation radar design, has very clear, and very real potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. (Effectively, and completely, neutralising the USA's use of AWACS for their detection).
This Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
-- Just Russian crap?, indeed it is! LMAO!
So, why all the rubbish?
Explained perfectly.
We got a certified yapper over here
How many of them are in service since they are so good?🤡
The American = None of you know anything, the F-22 is by far the best fighter in the world. It's insulting even trying to compare the F-22 with that Russian rubbish SU-57 (with washing machine microchips) and with an RCS of a Jumbo Jet! (Stamps foot)
And, and.... The F-22 costs billions, the SU-57 cost pence... You know nothing!!
Me = Tell us all, when and where you've ever seen the F-22 do anything, that would allow you to form, and to hold that opinion?
The American = That just proves you know nothing, the F-22 is so good, it would just be overkill to use it against any of this rubbish out there, right? Just wait till it is needed, then you'll learn!
Me = -- Just Russian crap? FACT = A Russian SU-57 flying well behind the front lines in Russian airspace, detected a Ukrainian SU-27, deep in Ukrainian airspace heading toward Kiev, about 300 km's away, the SU-57 tracked then fired a Russian very long range Vympel R-37 (NATO "Axehead") hypersonic air-to-air BVR missile at the Ukrainian SU-27, from a range of well over 250 km's, blowing it out of the sky, and smashing the previous BVR missile kill range world record, to utter smithereens!
FACT = The USA has had the F-22 in service for 19 years, and it finally made its first air-to-air kill in 2023, when it shot down a Chinese weather balloon. LMFAO.
The American = Gone! LOL.
@@jaylenflanagan1295 You, Americans, have no idea at all just how far behind you've become across all areas of today's modern militaries.
And when we really do, just take a step back, and actually analyse the USA's real military capabilities, today? It's a horror story for you in all honesty.
Over these last 25 years, you've been out thought (right across the board), you've been significantly out-built, and you've been technically beaten hands down, by both Russia, and China, (who are banging out modern hi-tech, hi-quality, military hardware in all areas of their military today).
Even though much is largely defensive, it's also tactically offensive, and being done with a very focused analytic understanding of where they need to be by various stages of their military advancement.
And although we actually know very little about most of it, what they've allowed us to see, there's not anything I could single out and start to criticize, even if I wanted too. Everything, so far, has been completely logical.
A great question that points out today's actual military power realities, is, what does the USA lead the world in today, concerning anything military at all? And the answer to that question is, absolutely nothing!
For example... In today's world of hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the Chinese DF-21D - operational range (1700 km's) that can sink any carrier in the world with a single hit.
All Navies, including the USA's, without the ability to stop these missiles, are in effect obsolete today. Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile, though inferior in way of operational range-400kms it can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships making it deadly to any carrier in the world. (Russia also has the Brahmos and the P-800 Oniks Anti-Ship missiles).
We know, the US haven't got a destroyer or any other means that can defend against these modern hi tech ASM's today! Meaning, the USA's Navy is pretty much obsolete in today's world.
The US jets can travel about 500-650 (max) km's out - and the same back again = 1300 km's range. Seeing the US unable to deploy any carrier close enough to reach any inland target, and then get back again. Anywhere inside 1700 km's they're sunk, they're toast, they're history.
This is also why when we hear the USA "trumpeting out" how they're sending a carrier to the South China Sea, (as some kind of propaganda imagined threat toward China) when looking at their GPS positioning of their carrier's in the SCS, you'll never see them closer than 2000 km's from Chinas mainland... It's more commonly known as "bluster".
Then, when looking at the most important military area today, Electronic Warfare (E/W)? The Russians are literally decades ahead.
Russia have the GaN MMICs, the krasukha, the murmansk-BN, and Magrav technology (NATO: Khibiny) developed by Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (called “a modern-day Nikola Tesla”).
And we can say for sure, this EW hardware is super impressive. We've no answer to it. We've also seen this E/W in action on at least 4 occasions we know of... (Obviously denied claims by the USA), only if untrue? I'm left asking why we saw the response from the USA, basically confirming these events?
1) In 2013, we've seen a Russian SU-24 fly repeatedly around and directly over the USS Cook, leaving the Cook helpless to defend itself.
2) In 2014, we've seen a Russian SU-24 (flying at an altitude of only 10 feet), fly directly at, and straight over the USS Ross, eleven times, with the Ross completely unable to prevent It or respond to It.
3) As Russian forces arrived In Syria in 2015 we had many reports of US/NATO/Israeli Radar becoming scrambled, leaving them unable to communicate, or offer any response to the Russian forces. As one report said, the silence from the West was deafening!
4) In March 2015, a further related report notes. Federation submarine naval forces attacked with their advanced electronic defensive weapons the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) causing it to turn and struggle to the coast of Britain to the amazement of the public, where she remained for 9 days undergoing Intensive major re-wiring.
It's believed the Russian electronic warfare pods (NATO: Khibiny) were used in a Russian trial of this technology for its submarine fleets.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest, who said of the encounter with the Cook... "This incident is entirely inconsistent with the professional norms of militaries operating in close proximity with each other in international waters. E/C measures taken by the Russian Federation are unacceptable".
To which the Russian MoD replied... "Frankly speaking, [we] do not understand the reason for such a painful reaction of our American colleagues, as the principle of freedom of navigation for the US destroyer, (which is staying in close proximity to a Russian naval base in the Baltic Sea), does [not] at all cancel the principle of freedom of flight for Russian aircraft testing Russian defensive systems".
A further Ministry of Defence (MoD) report also stated that for the second time in two years, advanced Federation “electronic warfare defences” have crippled the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG-75)- It was noted when Baltic Fleet “special forces elements” offered assistance to tow the destroyer back to their Polish port, the Americans refused to respond.
According to this report, in April 2014, the USS Donald Cook, while performing a mission in the Black Sea, substantially violated Federation “territorial integrity” causing President Putin to authorize an “electronic warfare defence” attack against it, that was so devastating this top-line warship was left adrift-and once towed back to its Romanian port, its American sailors were so demoralized 27 of them filed immediate letters of resignation from the US Navy.
One year later, in May 2015, this report continues, and again in the Black Sea, the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ross (DDG-71) substantially violated Federation “territorial integrity” causing President Putin, to once again, authorize an “electronic warfare defence” attack against it.
But when confronted with the fate that befell the USS Donald Cook the year prior, it retreated-causing one Russian top-level Naval Officer to state: "It seems that the Americans did not forget the April 2014 USS Donald Cook incident - A Federation SU-24 equipped with EW pods shut down the new American destroyer".
This attack encounter of Federation forces with the USS Donald Cook, this report details, began when this American warship began an “aggressive combat manoeuvre” against the Baltic Sea Fleet port in Kaliningrad, to which President Putin authorized an immediate “electronic warfare defence” against it.
And then, when we look at ground warfare? Russian troops with reserves, outnumber the USA, and any attack on Russia, would immediately see China join the conflict, then outnumbering the USA in the millions today.
And also, what have we ever seen from US troops, that could make anyone believe or think, they'd be any sort of threat or match to these well-disciplined, well-trained Russian troops, who are all fully bled, and are prepared to fight for their country's freedom, (so they'll be fighting for all the right reasons), while the US troops, would only be fighting for attempted US tyranny.
All throughout the history of wars, all those fighting for the right reasons, (like their own freedom), have never lost, yet on the other hand, all those who fought for all the wrong reasons, like global control/tyranny, have all, not only lost, but all have been annihilated.
The American people themselves, would all be very wise to understand this, as we see this in every war, over and over again, nothing will change this time, only the annihilation might be much more severe, but it must also be recognized, and said, just as deserved!
In the world of modern hi tech missiles? Russia easily rules the missile world today. Russia's modern hi-tech missiles that include hypersonic missiles (with Russian GLONASS, GPS targeting systems), give Russia such incredible precision, the USA has nothing we can say even compares.
And as we've all witnessed, Russia was pinpoint accurate, targeting single buildings in Syria, guiding their missiles straight down chimney pots, or straight in through the front door, and doing so from the Caspian Sea from distances of, up to 6500 km away.
Russia has also provided clear, precise footage, of all her long range missile attacks in Syria, (that we can see all came from the Russian control room online). Russian hypersonic missiles, we all know the USA can't defend against, and Russia has many other lethal hypersonic missiles being created and added to her arsenal.
Personally, in any upcoming war? I give the USA precisely zero chance, none, not even a little snippet of a chance, annihilation is all they'll get. And again, 100% deservedly so.
Old propaganda. World has changed a lot since that was published, and not in benefit of the "actors" of that publicity reportage 😂
you're not adding much to the original video, like not at all much, people dont what this for you but for the original video, so, that make you a leacher!
назови хоть одну страну которую америка победила??
If that was the case why usa defeated in Afghanistan so badly by taliban.