ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

US New Supersonic Passenger Jet Finally Makes Its First Flight!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ค. 2024
  • The future of aviation looks bright! Following the recent unveiling of the upcoming silent supersonic jet, the X-59 Quesst, another aviation startup, Boom Supersonic, recently took a major step toward its goal of returning commercial supersonic aviation to the skies after the company's prototype aircraft, the XB-1, left the ground for the first time last month. In this video, you will learn about the XB-1's first flight, the key technologies it validates, and what the future holds for this project.

ความคิดเห็น • 133

  • @dreamburn1
    @dreamburn1 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    This information is good, but I am angry that you misleadingly claim a supersonic passenger jet has taken flight. I block channels who use Clickbait titles and thumbnails.

  • @adamlunn3071
    @adamlunn3071 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Ten years work to achieve 273mph at 7000ft. Is Boeing involved?

  • @ronbyers9912
    @ronbyers9912 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    This isn't a supersonic passenger jet. It is a test article designed to take one passneger past the speed of sound. It is intended to provide test data that will enable a new supersonic passneger jet in the future. Beautiful looking aircraft though.

    • @berniemccann8935
      @berniemccann8935 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ... the non-existent future.

    • @lloydrmc
      @lloydrmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      A380s aren't selling, either.

    • @EBaker0129
      @EBaker0129 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I cant stand the way these clips intro's dont match the story. The title is bullshit!!!

    • @daleleggette
      @daleleggette หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Watch the whole video.. it explains all that

    • @martinpowell3855
      @martinpowell3855 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well since they have stopped building them it's not really a suprise is it 🧐

  • @AmericanBadger
    @AmericanBadger หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Cool plane, but why go to the trouble of creating an interesting story only to poison it with a false headline?

    • @babayao1180
      @babayao1180 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Click bait

  • @mrc6182
    @mrc6182 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    This is a LONGGGG way from a "supersonic passenger jet!"

  • @baburamadhikari8487
    @baburamadhikari8487 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    I hope this technology will make the world an even smaller village.

  • @kennethwhitmarsh5676
    @kennethwhitmarsh5676 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    America wouldn't accept the British concord and now they will claim they invented the super sonic passenger jet

  • @bernie2108
    @bernie2108 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    no way yet a passenger aircraft just a prototype to test its feasibility. You yanks !

  • @Eric-jo8uh
    @Eric-jo8uh หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Bring back the Concorde, it already holds passengers.

  • @dantea6
    @dantea6 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    They need to partner with boeing, because they are so awesome and have a great safety record

  • @AtleBerven
    @AtleBerven 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Lovely to hear that you are using RUNWAY, and the voice of Vincent 🙂

  • @vegasflyboy67
    @vegasflyboy67 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The more I look at this plane the more beautiful it gets.

  • @ZAHIDALI-ky1ky
    @ZAHIDALI-ky1ky 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I love and am proud of my country the beautiful USA.

    • @seekeroftruth1200
      @seekeroftruth1200 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      RFK, Jr. should be the next POTUS.

  • @pigdroppings
    @pigdroppings หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A plane for multi-millionaires ... only they could afford the ticket price.

  • @steveyewman
    @steveyewman 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It’s like a teeny weeny tiny British Concord……which was designed in the 60’s and flew from the 70’s….that’s progress!

  • @cactiish
    @cactiish 14 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    👍👍👍 But I will never be able to afford a flight 😔

  • @geoffbucks5803
    @geoffbucks5803 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Remember the TSR2 - this looks like that

    • @annosborne7365
      @annosborne7365 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We could have made a fortune with the tsr2 but the Labour government scrapped it

  • @old.not.too.grumpy.
    @old.not.too.grumpy. 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Presumably because this supersonic plane is American Congress won't block it from landing the USA😂

  • @dalemcbee6413
    @dalemcbee6413 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Beautiful

  • @leeswecho
    @leeswecho 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    back of the napkin -- three J85's just barely produce as much thrust as a single F404, which is mounted on trainers like the T-7A, which is itself barely supersonic. So I guess that checks out, the XB-1 is probably trimmed of as much weight as possible so that those J85's can do the job for these tests.

  • @gregwarner3753
    @gregwarner3753 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Looks like a lawn dart that grew up and got an engine. Any resemblance to an XB-70 is not a coincidence.

  • @HairilAnwar-ty6vx
    @HairilAnwar-ty6vx 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cantik dan menakjubkan

  • @dannydaw59
    @dannydaw59 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What will make this aircraft better than the Concorde? I saw/read somewhere that the sonic boom won't be so loud.

  • @bobjimenez4464
    @bobjimenez4464 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A beautiful bird....continue to test and develop this marriage of technologies to perfection.

  • @msgeryjo
    @msgeryjo 12 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    I didn’t read all the comments, but I didn’t see anything about using carbon fiber for the fuselage. That Titanic sub IMploded under high water pressure because of carbon fiber stressed over time (could be a lie but that’s what I read) - doesn’t that put this aircraft at risk of EXploding at high altitude in low air pressure? it won’t go BOOM on the first flight…

  • @paulbenz8712
    @paulbenz8712 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Why not develop it on the base of a B1 bomber? First improve the fuselage and the size, then insert better jet engines. Then improve the shape to avoid sonic boom.

  • @garethwilliams976
    @garethwilliams976 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is a glossy take on something far in the future. I am wholly unconvinced.

  • @lightningmcqueen181
    @lightningmcqueen181 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Looks a bit Small for a "passenger jet"

  • @nadeemmustafa6450
    @nadeemmustafa6450 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    BEST OF LUCK 👍👍👍🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
    BEST WISHES FROM PAKISTAN

  • @zanzillahsaruji9966
    @zanzillahsaruji9966 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Sarawak in East Malaysia and Japanese Company is producing SAF ( Sustainable Aviation Fuel ) clean environmental for future aircraft fuel.....

  • @gillesbueno1153
    @gillesbueno1153 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    I saw something flying similar some 70 years ago…

  • @jbtonline
    @jbtonline หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I's BOOM the best name for an aircraft? Just saying ...

    • @berniemccann8935
      @berniemccann8935 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably, a Boeing version named Boing !

    • @alanbreeze4731
      @alanbreeze4731 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What about BUMP when the company collapses

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ หลายเดือนก่อน

    It will be interesting to learn what the fuel cost per passenger per kilometre is. This first flight of the prototype is encouraging. Wait for the flight of a full scale example of this jet to learn if will achieve the aims of its designers.

  • @trevorclarke5520
    @trevorclarke5520 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting video, but it's a pity about the ridiculous "Clickbait" title, and a project name that will likely raise a lot of opposition to the idea of another SST!
    Also, it would be good to have a commentary that could pronounce Concorde correctly and didn't sound so incredulous at the first flight's maximum speed of 273 mph at a staggering 7,120 feet. WOW!!

  • @bobnomura2068
    @bobnomura2068 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think it's fine, good effort to design a supersonic airliner. BUT what about the economics ? NASA is currently in the test phase of trying to change a supersonic boom to a thump, which is a key economic factor, allowing supersonic flight over land. This was a problem for the concorde,. If range issues can be dealt with in the full scale design allowing flights over the Pacific, then they may have a chance.

  • @ammarbista101
    @ammarbista101 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    We go to New era

  • @vimmentors6747
    @vimmentors6747 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SOOOOI MANY ERRORS IN THIS. Hire an editor.

  • @carlmorgan8452
    @carlmorgan8452 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    BOOM

  • @alistairhutcheon7440
    @alistairhutcheon7440 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is way behind the BAC 221

  • @wictimovgovonca320
    @wictimovgovonca320 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting development, but I expect the money will chase X-59 based follow-ons. There was a limited market for Concorde, but it had a lot of government subsidies (UK & France). I believe the subsidies amounted to $8000 per passenger, not a good proposition.

  • @HDEFMAN1
    @HDEFMAN1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We will see the return of supersonic flight it is just a question of time. Yes the video title is a bit misleading, and yes the XB-1 is a flying test bed, but things are moving in the right direction. That is one beautiful plane prototype or not.

  • @Vidz0022
    @Vidz0022 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Should have called it Zoom instead :D

  • @driftert5687
    @driftert5687 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What a big deal. You are reinventing the wheel 😂

  • @Mstred
    @Mstred 19 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Nothing more than click bait! So sad, I was actually rooting for them at one time. The real plane should actually be ready around 2060.

  • @lacollineenchantee980
    @lacollineenchantee980 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Passenger Jet with one seat at a time when missiles are hypersonic .... ? don't quite get the point ...

  • @guyburgess5307
    @guyburgess5307 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Similar to the TSR2 design

  • @davidmann4533
    @davidmann4533 17 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    There is no need for a supersonic passenger jet let’s get real😂

  • @bethanyhealy4989
    @bethanyhealy4989 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Boeing Had nothing to do with this right?

  • @davidgrisez
    @davidgrisez หลายเดือนก่อน

    This effort by Boom Supersonic to eventually develop and sell a commercial supersonic passenger transport jet will still have two of the big problems that the Concorde Supersonic jet had. One problem is that the ticket price will be very high, so that only a very limited group of people will use this airplane for travel. The second problem is that traveling at Supersonic Speed will have very high fuel consumption. As a result I suspect that at the most only a few of these Supersonic airplanes will ever be made and used.

  • @LimSoonYit
    @LimSoonYit 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It a Valuable to develop to achieve technology but it is a high cost to keep up to maintain the Value. Learn from the disaster of Concorde. Life is more valuable than pursuing advanced technology. We are not in the Time Zone yet.

  • @normanriggs848
    @normanriggs848 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I would love to see it happen. BUT. It will be too small to make enough money for the airlines. The Concorde only held 100 people, was very small inside, and the ticket cost was amazingly high! and it still lost money every year. I think near the very end they jacket up the cost of a ticket to the point it actually made some money but the cost of a ticket was so high only the very rich individuals and corporations could even come close to buying a ticket. With an airplane only capable of seating less than 100 might have great technology it will never make a profit!!

  • @yixnorb5971
    @yixnorb5971 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    So it trims a couple hours to go across the pond. And it chugs fuel. And max 80 passengers. Not sustainable.

  • @dogelephant
    @dogelephant 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just leave it Elon. He will work it out.

  • @WilliamLHart
    @WilliamLHart 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At the current rate of development, the future regulation compliance and engineering/material hurdles my estimate the Click Bait title will more likely be honest and valid in about another 15 to 20 years.

  • @ImperialArmour
    @ImperialArmour หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    273mph/430kmh is not very fast.

  • @ahmadmustakhimabdmutalib59
    @ahmadmustakhimabdmutalib59 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😢yea, boom sound one freighway experience

  • @gtr1952
    @gtr1952 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everything that we learn advances the technology that we already know. It can be used in everything we already do to improve everything for everyone. It's how science advances everything. Their is no fail, its how much better. Perfection has a higher price, and that is what is being paid now. JMHO --gary

  • @mini-z_me
    @mini-z_me หลายเดือนก่อน

    I see a single member of the flight crew, but where are the passengers? 😜

  • @ammarbista101
    @ammarbista101 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I believe 😮this news

  • @alanbaxter8100
    @alanbaxter8100 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    *Another Nonsense Documentary, What are You Looking to Achieve ?*

  • @alalfred3474
    @alalfred3474 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without a credible and efficient engine, SST is just a dream, or a nightmare for its investors.

    • @knsubramanian9837
      @knsubramanian9837 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It is not the question of “credible engine” !. It is the “ sonic boom “ that must be suppressed or reduced to the level of normal subsonic aircraft!. Otherwise,building a supersonic passenger aircraft is not difficult!.Remember the concord which flew first in 1971 at Mach 2 speed! Concord flew for more than 30 years!.

  • @robertbeane8792
    @robertbeane8792 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How many people can it carry!?

    • @berniemccann8935
      @berniemccann8935 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess that you didn't listen to the video.

  • @JohnWard-mb9hp
    @JohnWard-mb9hp 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    There is only one plain concord simple

  • @raydunn2582
    @raydunn2582 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    NOT a new jet - a test vehicle ONLY. False advertising.

  • @andyhughes1776
    @andyhughes1776 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most people can never afford to fly in one.
    So, it will never serve their needs.

  • @grasuh
    @grasuh หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thumbs down for misleading headline.

  • @jamesmaroon6161
    @jamesmaroon6161 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I say cut some of the cost and build this jet now

  • @stevemcdonald1033
    @stevemcdonald1033 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It'll never fly. The "silent" Overture airliner would encounter too much expense in getting all the approvals it would need, to carry passengers. No private company could afford it or ever make a profit on it. The only reason the Concorde was able to go into service was the huge subsidies provided by the British and French governments. Billionaires didn't get their money by making foolish expenditures of their capital.

  • @Bodneyblue
    @Bodneyblue หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the reasons Concorde failed was because the ticket cost was to high for most people. So not enough passengers...start losing money..end of buisness...Yes there were other factors...as I said "One of the reasons"..(the crash being the final nail in the coffin).This will be aimed at the rich..but as Concorde proved...that don't always work...Even Concorde had to make short pleasure flights (still not cheap) in an attempt to make money..It's why we had the 747 and now A380...Get more people in the air in the same amount of time reduces cost of tickets..and so more can fly keeping a steady flow of customers.

    • @kapjay6568
      @kapjay6568 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is for "creamy layer" customers. So dont compare pricing, market to that of jet blue or southwest 😂😂😂😂

  • @muhammadsiddiquethebo5168
    @muhammadsiddiquethebo5168 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The plane shown in vedio is not capable to carry passenger

  • @aoife1122
    @aoife1122 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please AI, do not call her "the" Concorde.

  • @healthy_smart
    @healthy_smart หลายเดือนก่อน

    Misleading headline! 😖😖😖😖

  • @janosfekete4417
    @janosfekete4417 หลายเดือนก่อน

    PLAZMA HAJTÓMŰVEL ŰRHAJÓ IS LEHETNE!

  • @richardfroud8970
    @richardfroud8970 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like Concorde🇬🇧🤨

  • @MatthewGuzman-yo2ew
    @MatthewGuzman-yo2ew หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The name “Boom “ is better then Boeing”

    • @AmericanBadger
      @AmericanBadger หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MatthewGuzman-yo2ew Lately, when I hear the word boom in the context of the aircraft industry, I think first of Boeing.

  • @Laljack564
    @Laljack564 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Engineers wait too long to improve technology.

  • @jonpetter8921
    @jonpetter8921 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is only one supersonic passenger made: the concorde.

    • @lloydrmc
      @lloydrmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jonpetter8921 ...Concorde used to be made. In the 70s

    • @jonpetter8921
      @jonpetter8921 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lloydrmc It was the only working supersonic passenger made.

    • @lloydrmc
      @lloydrmc หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jonpetter8921 ...in the 70s

    • @jonpetter8921
      @jonpetter8921 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lloydrmc Do you have anything better ?

  • @muhamadkamali7037
    @muhamadkamali7037 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    👍

  • @aoca3817
    @aoca3817 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Personallee i'm a Pull back on le throttel to go faster sort ov piolet myself

  • @The-KP
    @The-KP หลายเดือนก่อน

    c l i c k b a i t

  • @americanknow8232
    @americanknow8232 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Made by Boeing. Ups!

  • @arturobayangos1223
    @arturobayangos1223 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    that is nothing . TOFU will copy it in 2 days .

  • @peterrobinson319
    @peterrobinson319 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Slower than Concorde, and maybe less passengers, plus no explanation of "No Sonic Boom"

  • @phansao2547
    @phansao2547 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I don’t like it, too expensive and take too long to build.

  • @ryzlot
    @ryzlot หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pure babble - too many flawed arguments to cite. This design cannot be scaled up to a passenger configuration. Naming the engine over-ture does not help with the conceptualization
    JR

  • @zeestar6187
    @zeestar6187 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Banned French Super sonic but this one is legal?

  • @pauljmeyer1
    @pauljmeyer1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mmmmm...

  • @TunLeng-i1z
    @TunLeng-i1z 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤very very good happy ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @robthatsme9831
    @robthatsme9831 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are feet and miles? You’re on the www.

  • @davidheitman7004
    @davidheitman7004 หลายเดือนก่อน

    crap. waiting to long!

  • @David-tt1rb
    @David-tt1rb 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    More lies

  • @hswing11
    @hswing11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    B F D

  • @bikelifepov9617
    @bikelifepov9617 หลายเดือนก่อน

    goofy as plane. bring out the anti gravity crafts!!

  • @robthatsme9831
    @robthatsme9831 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👎 and non subscribe until you speak metric or both.

  • @MrPathanoo
    @MrPathanoo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    GREAT. Keep going. Make America PROUD.