Except no country on this Earth recognizes Taiwan as an independent country. So "It doesn't matter how many times the YOU repeat the lies, or how angry YOU pretend to be, - Taiwan 🇹🇼 is still NOT an independent country." Don't try to be cheap. No country win the independency by Just Mouth or Pen. Learn from your master US, use your blood to win your independency. Of course there is no guaranty of independency even after you loss all your blood.
@@colinlee9678 Because it does not matter what the world thinks, it matters what the Taiwan people think. The rest of the world still treats Taiwan as an independent country in terms of trade, arms sales, treaties, etc.
@@colinlee9678 though some countries and the UN say they acknowledges the "One China" policy, they still deal with Taiwan like it's its own thing. The U.S., UK, and Japan, for example, have trade, security, and diplomatic ties with Taiwan. So, it's not as simple as just calling Taiwan a "province" of China-there's more going on behind the scenes.
President Lai has a point. That made more sense than that 9-line bs. I think Taiwan should resolve any territorial issues with the Philippines first then work collectively in their defence. It's better to be prepared than to be caught with your pants down.
@@袁大陸 it's for the people of Taiwan to decide. Besides, if only the Chinese government was not that oppressive towards its' people then they would have no problem convincing Taiwan for reunification. The whole world knows the story of the boy and the tank. Don't bother convincing me that China is heaven on earth.
@@Techguy-zt3mz If President Lai still use “Republic of China “as our great country’s official name. It allows 1.4 billion Chinese people to decide Taiwan’s fate.
@@袁大陸 a typical communist response. You guys are so predictable. So, by your logic. China has every right to decide Taiwans' fate because majority of the mainland Chinese says so. I bet you don't even know how crazy that sounds 😂. No one wants an oppressive government. Deal with it.
@@williamzabiski7653 thanks. I have read somewhere years way back but didn’t know what treaty when the emperor signed a treaty around 1600 I think. That time the wordings were in Latin and the Chinese Emperor trusted the deal but was ceded to Russia. I’ll check your reference. Thank you.
I am happy to be reeducated here (with facts only) but I really can't understand why Chinese people continually look back at the historical achievements of the Manchurian (Qing) government? The Manchus had many battles with the Mongols and eventually conquered China. Saying that the Qing is Chinese is like the Greeks claiming Ottoman achievements or the French claiming Roman achievements. Although the French were once Roman's people would laugh if they hung their hat on Roman history and territory. To me the Qing are as Chinese as Genghis Khan, in otherwards not Chinese at all so it is ridiculous for the PRC to claim their achievements.
Exactly, Its hypocritical; as well as inconsistent. If you follow CCP's narrative on historical claims one can't just phantom how dumb and stupid it is.
Because the Qing dynasty was invited by Wu Sangui to join forces to conquer China, and they together conquered China. So, it was a Chinese-Manchu conquest of China from the very beginning, Wu Sangui later tried to take the power but failed.
The Constitution of the Republic of China provides for sovereignty over the Chinese mainland and the Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for sovereignty over Taiwan. So this is a civil war between China's two governments. Whoever wins will have sovereignty Over China and Taiwan.
@@c0smicbyte Correct but that doesn't make Mongols Chinese. The Romans built Constantinople as its second capital where what is now the city of Istanbul. The Turkish people of today do not lay claim to Roman achievements.
If we follow China's rhetoric about the historical justification for claiming territories outside the internationally recognized boundaries, Mongolia owns vast territories inside China, including its present capital Beijing. The Mongolian Yuan Dynasty in China built Beijing as its capital in 1267, moving it from Karakorum in Mongolia. The Yuan Dynasty was established in 1271 when the Mongols unified China after defeating the Southern Song. The Mongol leader Kublai Khan ordered the reconstruction of Beijing, which was previously destroyed by the Genghis Khan Empire in 1215.
@@ColoniaMurder20 that claim that modern japanese have 20% ainu is very wrong. Most are just yayoi. Rest are assimilated groups that were native to the island.
This is the weirdness thing: Lai declared PRC's territorial integrity claim for PRC. He should go back and learn what PRC's territorial claims were when it founded itself in Oct 1949. They included Tibet, Xingjian (which had Soviet Force there)), and Taiwan, But No Mongolia lost by ROC or Other Lands lost to Russia by Qing dynasty.
chiba never sold any property to russia. it was force annexation when china was at its weakest point in history . no money change hand except by force like what happened to hong kong
China have right to cede disputed Manchuria to the Soviet. China also agreed outer Mongolia independence. China also gave Vietnam one island on south china sea. But china does not agree to Taiwan independence.
“Taiwan is recognized as part of China, a position acknowledged globally, including by the United States. This status stems from the outcomes of World War II, and challenging these results could be highly risky, potentially destabilizing the international order. Many other regions, such as Turkey and Greece or Japan and Korea, still have unresolved disputes, highlighting the potential for broader instability if historical agreements are contested.”
The Qings were weak and signed the unequal treaties with Russia.The Qing dynasty and the Russian monarchy were already gone but the KMT and subsequently the CPC ruling China today has to keep her side of the bargain.
So what is President Lai's position on Taiwan's historical status? By mentioning the Russian question, Lai is effectively saying that Taiwan is indeed historically Chinese. However, for the past 30 years, the DPP folks have also been claiming Taiwan has always been an external entity that is sort of linked to China but not really historically part of China? Interesting for Lai to raise the Russian question but does not change anything. The current basis of Taiwan being part of China is 1945. The Japanese lost and surrendered Taiwan to China, simple as that.
I would like the Official Government of Mainland China and the Official Government of Taiwan to, please, immediately and permanently return Formosa Island to the sovereignty of the Official Government of the Philippines ASAP.
CCP government should reclaim those lost territories due to unequal treaty’s that a Vast territory lost to Russia. Slow row on the claim on Taiwan and South Tibet focus on getting those territories from Russia. Peace
I thought drugs were illegal in Taiwan. Tell Mr Lai to read his own Taiwanese constitution, The Republic China's government position own history, the writings of Sun Yat Sen and look at the map of Qing China. It is the Republic of China aka Taiwan who legally still claims lands occupied by Russia, not the PRC. The PRC has solved all of its territorial disputes with Russia. It is the ROC who still legally claims sovereignty over Mongolia, not the PRC It is the Republic of China aka Taiwan who used to carry air raids on Mainland China coastal regions all the way to Shanghai in attempt to get a foothold on Mainland China. It is the Republic of China who used to carry out an insurgency into Mainland China from the jungles of Myanmar until the PLA and the Burmese military got together defeated them and pushed them out. Up until 1991 the Taiwanese military was raising a military to invade and reconquer the Mainland. For decades the government in Taiwan claimed to be the legitimate government of thr whole of China. Up until 1972 they used to represent the whole of China in the UN security council. Now you are claiming you are not Chinese anymore even though your own name says Republic of China. 🤣 You can't make this stuff up. The level or cognitive dissonance in the DPP is off the ritcher scale. It's unbelievable how some people in Taiwan live in their own alternative reality, create their own narrative completely void of facts and reality , make up their own facts, believe in own alternative reality. What the heck is wrong with these people. We need a blood test in some of these people. Sober people don't behave this way.
The Republic of China lost the mainland and retreated to this island. In fact they represented the mainland until they were kicked out of the UN in the early 1970s. By the way the US, India, the UK, the Philippines all voted to kick them out 😂😂😂😂
What a Lie! PRC claimed Taiwan in 1949. Are you saying PRC, the sick man of Asian at the time, wanted to dominate Asia Pacific in 1949? What a silly idea. When you have a right to something, it does not mean you have to claim it. PRC did have the right to reclaim Lands lost to Russia in 1949, including Mongolia. But they decided to Not do that. So PRC gave up these territories claims in 1949 when it was founded. But it did clearly claimed Taiwan, along with Tibet and Xingjian etc in 1949. This is a Historic Fact. So this point about PRC’s claim on Taiwan is not about Territory Integrity is just laughable for others outside Taiwan cocoon.
@@blintzkreig1638 You are entitled to your opinion. Unfortunately this world does not run by your opinion. CCP clearly claimed these places in 1949 when they founded PRC. Many people opposed that, including KMT and ROC. And CCP fought for their claims, including drove back US army from PRC border to 38 parallel line in Korea War and a border war with Soviet. It also fought border wars with India and Vietnam. Now CCP is preparing to retake Taiwan with force. You better join the army and fight against CCP. Otherwise your opinion means nothing.
@@gogofmagog2382 You are entitled to your opinion. But the emperors of Yuan and Qing dynasties claimed themselves to be Chinese. So they converted to Chinese Culture. The so-called barbarians who sacked Rome did not do that. That is the difference. This is the same for Christianity. It was created in Middle East. But because Rome converted to it, now the Europeans called themselves Christian.
@@qingzhou9983lol I dont know what is your point, since when is Chinese ever a religion, even Buddhism came from Himalayas not in China. if you want to keep on claiming other territories as yours based on your 5,000 yrs of history, how come Manchus & Mongolia land the size of two India was taken from China by Russia. whatever you have just be contented, dont be greedy for more, or more will be taken from you.
Article 10 of the Taipei Peace Treaty stipulates that “nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores).” Therefore the Taipei Peace Treaty transferred Japans sovereignty of Taiwan to ALL the inhabitants living of the island NOT to mainland China. The inhabitants in 1952 were the ROC escapees, Taiwanese Aborigines, Japanese descendants, Dutch descendants, Portuguese descendants, previous Chinese descendants. As you stated, the island was not ceded to the PRC
@@vietnguyen4312 - Article 10 of the “Nikka Peace Treaty” (日華講和条約) seems to impart a veneer of legitimacy to the Jan. 1, 1946 (retroactive to October 25, 1945) forced mass nationalization of the native inhabitants of UN forces-occupied Japanese Taiwan. But you are imparting article 10 of that treaty with too much, too deep meaning. Japan having stripped its former Komins of Japanese Taiwan of their Japanese nationality effective April 28, 1952, the latter needed an “ausweiss” or a “laissez passer”, or “travel documents” to travel between Japan and Taiwan. When article 10 of the treaty says “are deemed”, they are only deemed. That is all there is to it. Besides, the population of Taiwan is deemed such and such “for the purpose of the present treaty.” The September 29, 1972, normalization of diplomatic relations between Japan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), resulted in voiding the Treaty of Taipei. Some have concluded that the population of Taiwan is legally stateless as a result. Which segues into the issue of absence of international recognition of the “governing authorities ON Taiwan” (在台治理當局, TRA terminology) and the confusion between state sovereignty and popular sovereignty. The Treaty of Taipei could not supersede the San Francisco Peace Treaty. The Japanese government concluded a bilateral treaty of peace that could not grant the Chinese regime in exile ON Taiwan “greater advantages than those extended to the parties to the San Francisco Peace Treaty,” or the 49 signatories of the SFPT could all claim Taiwan (San Francisco Peace Treaty Article 26). Furthermore, the government of Japan had already lost territorial rights and the capacity to cede Taiwan when it signed the Treaty of Taipei. The Japanese government, having lost its territorial rights in the SFPT, could not transfer the sovereignty of Taiwan to the Chinese exiled regime ON Taiwan (TRA terminology). Owing to 50 years spent in bondage under the Chinese occupier’s straw sandal, the Taiwanese electorate is keen on popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty is the capacity of the electorate to get representatives mindful of their mission of keeping a government accountable to the people. State sovereignty, on the other hand, refers to the legal authority and responsibility of an independent state to govern and regulate its political affairs without foreign interference. Sovereign states have supreme authority over their territory. But US-DOS says that “the governing authorities ON Taiwan” do not enjoy the sovereignty of Taiwan, are not a state and that Taiwan is not independent, albeit not Chinese either. Earlier this year, a comment Miles Yu (余茂春) made in a Taiwan-related video program caught my attention. He said that he would lobby to get the TRA amended, to erase the ungainly “the people ON Taiwan” from the text of the act. I reached into the text of the TRA to compare the two English and Chinese language versions. There are 8 mentions of “the people ON Taiwan” and 6 mentions of “the governing authorities ON Taiwan”. Of the 8 mentions of “the people ON Taiwan” in the original, the Chinese version uses the correct “在台人民” translation only once, the first time. In all its other occurrences, the phrase is translated “台灣人民” (Taiwanese people) or “台灣之人民” (people of Taiwan). Of the 6 mentions of “the governing authorities ON Taiwan” in the original version, the Chinese version manages to correctly translate none. Instead, of “governing authorities ON Taiwan” (correct translation: 在台統治當局 or 在台治理當局), the Chinese version reads “Taiwan governing authorities” (台灣統治當局，台灣治理當局). Coached by US-DOS briefings until Kissinger kowtowed to Chou en-lai over the “undetermined international status” issue, Congress had purposefully come up with this weird phrasing, “the people ON Taiwan” and “the governing authorities ON Taiwan”. It all flows from San Francisco Peace Treaty territorial dispositions article 2 (b). Allow me to dot my I’s and cross my T’s here. You will be Chinese as long as you deem yourselves the “🇹🇼people ON Taiwan" (在台🇹🇼人民, TRA terminology). Shimonoseki Treaty → San Francisco Peace Treaty → UN Resolution 2758 does not impinge on Taiwan’s undecided international status → Taiwan Relations Act: Neither the peoples of China nor the deluded 24 million who deem themselves the “🇹🇼people ON Taiwan" (在台🇹🇼人民, TRA terminology) can enjoy Taiwan's sovereignty. This is the United States' ironclad position on post-WWII Taiwan. The United States has the final say. The Chinese from both shores of the strait are going to tell me that it is a domestic law of the USA and that no Chinese should bother with its content. But this betrayal of the letter of the TRA and of the intent of Congress had consequences on Lee Teng-hui, Chen Shui-bian, Tsai Ing-wen and, currently, Lai Ching-te’s tenures. As CEOs of the “governing authorities ON Taiwan”, they condoned and implemented the localization of an alien regime that is robbing Taiwan of its place among the nations. It should raise eyebrows both in the U.S.A. and ON Taiwan. I learned without surprise that the mangled translation, a blatant betrayal of the intent of Congress, was the deed of the Chinese KMT through AmCham Taiwan. But since AIT is hosting both the English and Chinese versions on its website, AIT and US-DOS should be held accountable before Congress for their inadequate oversight of the translation. That makes AIT accessory to the Chinese KMT’s contempt of Congress. While you are officially deeming yourselves Chinese, you are living the Chinese lie of Chinese Taiwan ON non-Chinese Taiwan. And you are giving the lie a new lease on life until Taiwan is ripe to fall into China’s lap. Don’t blame it on the messenger when you are officially deeming yourselves Chinese. Place the blame where blame belongs. - - - - - - - - - - 日華平和条約（日本国と中華民国との間の平和条約） 第十条 この条約の適用上、中華民国の国民には、台湾及び澎湖諸島のすべての住民及び以前にそこの住民であつた者並びにそれらの子孫で、台湾及び澎湖諸島において中華民国が現に施行し、又は今後施行する法令によつて中国の国籍を有するものを含むものとみなす。また、中華民国の法人には、台湾及び澎湖諸島において中華民国が現に施行し、又は今後施行する法令に基いて登録されるすべての法人を含むものとみなす。 Japan-China Peace Treaty (Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of China) Article 10 For the purposes of this Treaty, nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, as well as their descendants who have Chinese nationality in accordance with the laws and regulations now or hereafter enacted by the Republic of China in Taiwan and the Penghu Islands. Furthermore, corporations of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all corporations registered in accordance with the laws and regulations now or hereafter enacted by the Republic of China in Taiwan and the Penghu Islands. San Francisco Pece Treaty Article 23 (a) The present Treaty shall be ratified by the States which sign it, including Japan, and will come into force for all the States which have then ratified it, when instruments of ratification have been deposited by Japan and by a majority, including the United States of America as the principal occupying Power, of the following States, namely Australia, Canada, Ceylon, France, Indonesia, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Republic of the Philip pines, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America. The present Treaty shall come into force for each State which subsequently ratifies it, on the date of the deposit of its instrument of ratification. San Francisco Pece Treaty Article 26 Japan will be prepared to conclude with any State which signed or adhered to the United Nations Declaration of January 1, 1942, 1 and which is at war with Japan, or with any State which previously formed a part of the territory of a State named in Article 23, which is not a signatory of the present Treaty, a bilateral Treaty of Peace on the same or substantially the same terms as are provided for in the present Treaty, but this obligation on the part of Japan will expire three years after the first coming into force of the present Treaty. Should Japan make a peace settlement or war claims settlement with any State granting that State greater advantages than those provided by the present Treaty, those same advantages shall be extended to the parties to the present Treaty.
@@jeromebesson Whether you consider Taiwan a country or not does not automatically cede the island of Taiwan to the PRC. There are no internationally recognised treaties, policies or UN resolutions that state that Taiwan is part of China. Also, historically, China has had minimal control over the island of Taiwan, I will explain further below. Now some facts about Taiwan: 1: The island now known as Taiwan was inhabited and ruled by the aborigines for approximately 30,000 years. 2: When the Dutch arrived in 1626 most of the population of Formosa were the Yuanzhumin or Gaoshan people (who have no DNA link back to China) 3: The Qing government (who were NOT Chinese) had minimal control of Taiwan in fact the Qing only managed to rule less than 20% of the island while the aborigines ruled and controlled over 80% of the island. The Qing created a border in 1750 with rocks which was called the Tu Niu Red Line. The Japanese were the first country to colonise Formosa and create roads and infrastructure.. 4: Due to the lack of control, the Qing did not declare Formosa a Province of the Qing until 1885 as the Japanese was encroaching on the island. The island was handed to Japan soon after. 5: Over the past 400 years the island has been partially ruled by 5 different governments but it was only the Japanese and ROC who had full control of the entire island. 6: Historically the CCP recognized Formosan independence. In 1936, when the Republic of China (ROC) was China’s government and Taiwan (Formosa) was a Japanese colony, Chairman Mao Zedong offered support to Korea and Formosa if their peoples wished to gain independence from Japan. Mao’s internationalist position suggested that 1) both Korea and Formosa have a right to independence, and 2) this is based on the right to self-determination. Mao did not claim that Taiwan has been an integral part of China. (look up Edgar Snow interview)) 7: The Cairo Declaration 1943 discussed the possibility of handing the island of Taiwan to the ROC. This discussion required a treaty to become official and was never implemented. 8: The PRC constitution was formed in 1949 yet Taiwan was not added to it until 1978. 9: The ROC were granted a caretaker role of Formosa after WW2 but when the ROC escaped to the island it still legally belonged to Japan. 10: When Japan relinquished its sovereignty of Taiwan with The Treaty of San Francisco after the ROC invaded the Japanese island, China was not even invited. The treaty was signed by 49 nations but both the ROC and CCP were NOT present. 11: The One China Policy, Un Resolution 2758 or the Treaty of San Francisco do not declare that Taiwan is a province of China. There are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or UN resolutions that state that Taiwan is part of China. The only legal way that Taiwan can amalgamate with China is if they agree to a treaty ceding their sovereignty. Whether Taiwan is considered a country or not does not automatically grant China with sovereignty of the region.
@@vietnguyen4312 Where have I ever written that Taiwan had been ceded to China, to any China one way or another? Although I totally agree with the content of your comment, I resent the fact that you introduce it as if I allocated Taiwan to any China. You demonstrate a lot of brass, relying negatively on my comment as you do to state exactly what I have always been claiming in all my comments over many years. Please, save your otherwise commendable comment to paste it under every future “Taiwan Talks” episode, and have it pinned there by “Taiwan Talks”. I will always give it a thumb up. But, please, pretty please, do it independently of my comments and refrain from pretending that you misunderstood the content of my own comments.
@@vietnguyen4312 I disagree with your conclusion that "the Taipei Peace Treaty transferred Japan's sovereignty of Taiwan to ALL the inhabitants living of the island." You are falling into the -- Oh so -- Chinese and now Taiwanese foible of interpreting the content of the treaty as they see fit. You are also confusing state sovereignty and popular sovereignty. At the time of the San Francisco Peace Conference, Taiwan was still Japanese territory, albeit militarily occupied like the rest of Japan. During six year of occupation, the Chinese military government was bent on annexing Japanese Taiwan in total disregard of international law. Misrepresenting themselves as governors of Taiwan province of China, Chen Yi (29/08/1945 - 22/04/1945), Wei Dao-ming (16/05/1947 - 05/01/1949), Chen Cheng (05/01/1949 - 21/12/1949) and K.C. Wu (21/12/1949 - 16-04/1953) failed to establish the "Tai-Peng Advisory Council” (台澎諮詢會) as embryo of a future government of Tai-Peng. As a result, when the San Francisco Peace Conference was held, no Taiwan government had been established under the command of the Chinese military government and there was no representative of any Taiwan government on hand to receive from Japan recognition of Taiwanese independence. After April 28, 1952, the Republic of China armed forces garrisoned as occupation forces ON Taiwan and their notorious Taiwan Garrison Command (September 1945 - 1 August 1992) should have morphed into the Republic of China Civil Administration Of Tai-Peng (ROCCATP)). And the early "Tai-Peng Advisory Council” (台澎諮詢會) should have morphed into the government of Tai-Peng (台澎政府) headed by a popularly elected Taiwanese governor under ROCCATP overseight. In actuality, “the governing authorities ON Taiwan (在台治理當局, TRA terminology) managed to establish a semblance of that government of Tai-Peng (台澎政府) when they established the now moth-balled (July 2018) Taiwan Provincial Government (臺灣省政府) on May 16, 1947.
No worries. If taiwan does not want to unite with china, just press a w ar button with china. (US has been waiting very impatiently for taiwan to do so 👍👍) Taiwan success rate? Zero. W ar victory lies in only 1 factor - numbers of p ple willing to sacrifice for the country ( china win based on quantity), given both china and taiwan have the same advanced artillery.
Follow Taiwan Talks on Instagram instagram.com/taiwantalks_taiwanplus/
Congrats Republic of Taiwan! 😍😍😍😍
Congrats Republic of Hongkong! 😍😍😍😍
It doesn't matter how many times the Chinese regime repeats the *lies,*
or how *angry* it pretends to be,
- Taiwan 🇹🇼 is still an independent country.
Except no country on this Earth recognizes Taiwan as an independent country.
So "It doesn't matter how many times the YOU repeat the lies,
or how angry YOU pretend to be,
- Taiwan 🇹🇼 is still NOT an independent country."
Don't try to be cheap. No country win the independency by Just Mouth or Pen.
Learn from your master US, use your blood to win your independency.
Of course there is no guaranty of independency even after you loss all your blood.
Taiwan calls itself 「Republic of China 」。It means Taiwan belongs to China.
@@袁大陸or China belongs to Taiwan????
@@liyan8385
Yes, you’re very clever.
@@袁大陸
He/she has the right to dream about it.
"China will face end of regime if it attacks Taiwan 🇹🇼," asserted President Lai.
How can this be so when Taiwan is already recognised as a province of China by the rest of the world, including the UN, US, UK, Japan, etc?
@@colinlee9678 Vatican doesn't recognize the PRC which means god doesn't recognize PRC.
want to continue the silly game of pretend?
@@colinlee9678 Because it does not matter what the world thinks, it matters what the Taiwan people think. The rest of the world still treats Taiwan as an independent country in terms of trade, arms sales, treaties, etc.
@@colinlee9678 Using your argument, then China was not a country till 1979.
@@colinlee9678 though some countries and the UN say they acknowledges the "One China" policy, they still deal with Taiwan like it's its own thing. The U.S., UK, and Japan, for example, have trade, security, and diplomatic ties with Taiwan. So, it's not as simple as just calling Taiwan a "province" of China-there's more going on behind the scenes.
Finally someone speaks clearly!
Seriously, to gain some respect from other leaders, Xi Jinping needs to *stop his lies.*
Yiuvare fake and bot
@@AhmetTekin101 What lies?
Taiwan is internationally recognised as a province of China! Therefore where is the lie ?
@@colinlee9678 Show me the proof of what you said?
*And respect other countries sovereignty , including their Taiwanese neighbour !
Gogogo Taiwan fight for Independent 💪💪💪
Taiwan calls itself 「Republic of China 」。It means Taiwan belongs to China.
Free Manipur, kashmir and khalistan
@@袁大陸 : The CCP have never ruled Independent, democratic Taiwan. Over 90% of Taiwanese do not want the CCP.
Good show!
President Lai has a point. That made more sense than that 9-line bs. I think Taiwan should resolve any territorial issues with the Philippines first then work collectively in their defence. It's better to be prepared than to be caught with your pants down.
Taiwan calls itself 「Republic of China 」。It means Taiwan belongs to China.
@@袁大陸 it's for the people of Taiwan to decide. Besides, if only the Chinese government was not that oppressive towards its' people then they would have no problem convincing Taiwan for reunification. The whole world knows the story of the boy and the tank. Don't bother convincing me that China is heaven on earth.
@@Techguy-zt3mz
If President Lai still use “Republic of China “as our great country’s official name. It allows 1.4 billion Chinese people to decide Taiwan’s fate.
@@袁大陸 a typical communist response. You guys are so predictable. So, by your logic. China has every right to decide Taiwans' fate because majority of the mainland Chinese says so. I bet you don't even know how crazy that sounds 😂. No one wants an oppressive government. Deal with it.
@@Techguy-zt3mz
You are trained communist, you know better than anyone else.
I’m interested in this topic since China CCP claiming or annexed other countries territorial areas. How Russia annexed Chinas territory in question.
read the two treaty , treaty of aigun and treaty of beijing .
@@williamzabiski7653 thanks. I have read somewhere years way back but didn’t know what treaty when the emperor signed a treaty around 1600 I think. That time the wordings were in Latin and the Chinese Emperor trusted the deal but was ceded to Russia. I’ll check your reference. Thank you.
I would remove the word CCP… just China !
@@robrak3569 this is to clarify China with CCP is the most problematic, not China itself.
@@marierocher4422 China was, is and always will be problematic… regardless of regimes
Stay strong Taiwan and don’t worry, you are not alone.
Taiwan is an independent country.
Never
@@DK-gj5sp Keep dreaming tough , Donkey King 👑
I am happy to be reeducated here (with facts only) but I really can't understand why Chinese people continually look back at the historical achievements of the Manchurian (Qing) government?
The Manchus had many battles with the Mongols and eventually conquered China.
Saying that the Qing is Chinese is like the Greeks claiming Ottoman achievements or the French claiming Roman achievements. Although the French were once Roman's people would laugh if they hung their hat on Roman history and territory.
To me the Qing are as Chinese as Genghis Khan, in otherwards not Chinese at all so it is ridiculous for the PRC to claim their achievements.
Exactly, Its hypocritical; as well as inconsistent. If you follow CCP's narrative on historical claims one can't just phantom how dumb and stupid it is.
Mongolia built Beijing as its capital during the Mongolian Yuan Dynasty during the reign of Kublai Khan.
Because the Qing dynasty was invited by Wu Sangui to join forces to conquer China, and they together conquered China. So, it was a Chinese-Manchu conquest of China from the very beginning, Wu Sangui later tried to take the power but failed.
The Constitution of the Republic of China provides for sovereignty over the Chinese mainland and the Constitution of the People's Republic of China provides for sovereignty over Taiwan. So this is a civil war between China's two governments. Whoever wins will have sovereignty Over China and Taiwan.
@@c0smicbyte Correct but that doesn't make Mongols Chinese.
The Romans built Constantinople as its second capital where what is now the city of Istanbul. The Turkish people of today do not lay claim to Roman achievements.
China Claims All Territory Lands Except the Russia Part is China Afraid of Russia 😅
If we follow China's rhetoric about the historical justification for claiming territories outside the internationally recognized boundaries, Mongolia owns vast territories inside China, including its present capital Beijing. The Mongolian Yuan Dynasty in China built Beijing as its capital in 1267, moving it from Karakorum in Mongolia. The Yuan Dynasty was established in 1271 when the Mongols unified China after defeating the Southern Song. The Mongol leader Kublai Khan ordered the reconstruction of Beijing, which was previously destroyed by the Genghis Khan Empire in 1215.
Sakhalin Region is belong to Japanese.. Japan should reclaim one of their ancestral lands in Northern Japan territories annexed by Russia.
Agreed
It belongs to ainus who are not ethnically japanese
@@villiamfangy6205 do you even know ancestry of modern japanese? just look at male japanese.
@@ColoniaMurder20 that claim that modern japanese have 20% ainu is very wrong. Most are just yayoi. Rest are assimilated groups that were native to the island.
@@villiamfangy6205arent Ainus related to Jomon. Jomon earliest inhabitant to Japan, intermixing with Yayoi you got the Japanese today.
China👎. Taiwan is #1. China belongs to Taiwan. From the Philippines.
China greediness is obvious 😮 money money money n power greediness 😮
LET THE WHOLE WORLD SUPPORT TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE !
Very informative session. I love the history given!
Taiwan is access to Pacific Ocean by China
This is the weirdness thing: Lai declared PRC's territorial integrity claim for PRC.
He should go back and learn what PRC's territorial claims were when it founded itself in Oct 1949. They included Tibet, Xingjian (which had Soviet Force there)), and Taiwan, But No Mongolia lost by ROC or Other Lands lost to Russia by Qing dynasty.
Do you think that the PRC would go after the Soviet Union after the USSR funded and supported them?
@@blintzkreig1638
Do you know PRC fought a border war with Soviet after it created and founded CCP And supported it with weapons in Korean War?
The World is at war
China CCP Sold it's Land Territory to Russia of 1.5 Square kilometers which is 45 times larger than Taiwan 😂😂😂 Humiliated by Russia
chiba never sold any property to russia. it was force annexation when china was at its weakest point in history . no money change hand except by force like what happened to hong kong
China have right to cede disputed Manchuria to the Soviet. China also agreed outer Mongolia independence. China also gave Vietnam one island on south china sea.
But china does not agree to Taiwan independence.
@@LeeSkJohn-sv8wi Humiliated by Russia 😂😂😂 Lol
@@LeeSkJohn-sv8wi The problem is Taiwan a Sovereign country 😂😁😂 Nothing China can do to take back Taiwan. LOL
@@daimos6686 tell your fantasy of Taiwan a sovereign country to the UN 🤣🤣🤣
How china reunification with Taiwan is none of your business. Lol.
China problems ❤😂
They finished Hong kong now they go for Taiwan
Taiwan is an independent sovereign state. China's encroachments into its neighbors is cringe af, copy pasting American imperialism lmao
“Taiwan is recognized as part of China, a position acknowledged globally, including by the United States. This status stems from the outcomes of World War II, and challenging these results could be highly risky, potentially destabilizing the international order. Many other regions, such as Turkey and Greece or Japan and Korea, still have unresolved disputes, highlighting the potential for broader instability if historical agreements are contested.”
Congrats Republic of Taiwan! 😍😍😍😍
Those other situations won't be calmed if china takes Taiwan.
The Qings were weak and signed the unequal treaties with Russia.The Qing dynasty and the Russian monarchy were already gone but the KMT and subsequently the CPC ruling China today has to keep her side of the bargain.
So what is President Lai's position on Taiwan's historical status?
By mentioning the Russian question, Lai is effectively saying that Taiwan is indeed historically Chinese.
However, for the past 30 years, the DPP folks have also been claiming Taiwan has always been an external entity that is sort of linked to China but not really historically part of China?
Interesting for Lai to raise the Russian question but does not change anything.
The current basis of Taiwan being part of China is 1945. The Japanese lost and surrendered Taiwan to China, simple as that.
China's concern is obvious, that's to defend Taiwan from breaking away and become a military base of the USA.
I would like the Official Government of Mainland China and the Official Government of Taiwan to, please, immediately and permanently return Formosa Island to the sovereignty of the Official Government of the Philippines ASAP.
One at the time says China after Taiwan and the whole Asian sea neighbouring countries will be next
Never
CCP government should reclaim those lost territories due to unequal treaty’s that a
Vast territory lost to Russia. Slow row on the claim on Taiwan and South Tibet focus on getting those territories from Russia. Peace
China only respect strength, so it preys on the weak.
Lai just a dreamer
Xi is trying to change a no win situation by rewriting the rules. God bless Taiwan 🇹🇼
Under DPP's governance, Taiwan's diplomatic friends were reduced further by another 10 .
maybe on paper, not in real.
@@gogofmagog2382 If you don't believe the UN, why do you want Taiwan to be a member?
I thought drugs were illegal in Taiwan.
Tell Mr Lai to read his own Taiwanese constitution, The Republic China's government position own history, the writings of Sun Yat Sen and look at the map of Qing China.
It is the Republic of China aka Taiwan who legally still claims lands occupied by Russia, not the PRC.
The PRC has solved all of its territorial disputes with Russia.
It is the ROC who still legally claims sovereignty over Mongolia, not the PRC
It is the Republic of China aka Taiwan who used to carry air raids on Mainland China coastal regions all the way to Shanghai in attempt to get a foothold on Mainland China.
It is the Republic of China who used to carry out an insurgency into Mainland China from the jungles of Myanmar until the PLA and the Burmese military got together defeated them and pushed them out.
Up until 1991 the Taiwanese military was raising a military to invade and reconquer the Mainland.
For decades the government in Taiwan claimed to be the legitimate government of thr whole of China.
Up until 1972 they used to represent the whole of China in the UN security council.
Now you are claiming you are not Chinese anymore even though your own name says Republic of China. 🤣
You can't make this stuff up.
The level or cognitive dissonance in the DPP is off the ritcher scale.
It's unbelievable how some people in Taiwan live in their own alternative reality, create their own narrative completely void of facts and reality , make up their own facts, believe in own alternative reality.
What the heck is wrong with these people.
We need a blood test in some of these people.
Sober people don't behave this way.
❤👍👍👍
he's right, and many little pink wu maos have been saying this for years
Taiwan must apply a membership in UN
Republican Of Taiwan 🇹🇼map😂🫸🏻🇨🇳
The Republic of China lost the mainland and retreated to this island. In fact they represented the mainland until they were kicked out of the UN in the early 1970s. By the way the US, India, the UK, the Philippines all voted to kick them out 😂😂😂😂
What a Lie! PRC claimed Taiwan in 1949. Are you saying PRC, the sick man of Asian at the time, wanted to dominate Asia Pacific in 1949? What a silly idea.
When you have a right to something, it does not mean you have to claim it. PRC did have the right to reclaim Lands lost to Russia in 1949, including Mongolia. But they decided to Not do that. So PRC gave up these territories claims in 1949 when it was founded. But it did clearly claimed Taiwan, along with Tibet and Xingjian etc in 1949. This is a Historic Fact.
So this point about PRC’s claim on Taiwan is not about Territory Integrity is just laughable for others outside Taiwan cocoon.
The CCP did not have a right to the South China Sea, Tibet, Mongolia, or Taiwan. There is no right that they have.
@@blintzkreig1638
You are entitled to your opinion. Unfortunately this world does not run by your opinion. CCP clearly claimed these places in 1949 when they founded PRC. Many people opposed that, including KMT and ROC. And CCP fought for their claims, including drove back US army from PRC border to 38 parallel line in Korea War and a border war with Soviet. It also fought border wars with India and Vietnam.
Now CCP is preparing to retake Taiwan with force. You better join the army and fight against CCP. Otherwise your opinion means nothing.
@@qingzhou9983China real history is the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. not when you were under the foreigner Manchuria & Mongolia powers.
@@gogofmagog2382
You are entitled to your opinion.
But the emperors of Yuan and Qing dynasties claimed themselves to be Chinese. So they converted to Chinese Culture. The so-called barbarians who sacked Rome did not do that. That is the difference.
This is the same for Christianity. It was created in Middle East. But because Rome converted to it, now the Europeans called themselves Christian.
@@qingzhou9983lol I dont know what is your point, since when is Chinese ever a religion, even Buddhism came from Himalayas not in China. if you want to keep on claiming other territories as yours based on your 5,000 yrs of history, how come Manchus & Mongolia land the size of two India was taken from China by Russia. whatever you have just be contented, dont be greedy for more, or more will be taken from you.
金马是中国领土，台湾不是。
中国人民或「在台 🇹🇼 人民」 不会拥有台湾的主权。 「在台🇹🇼治理当局」不享有台湾和澎湖的领土主权。该领土主权由「主要占领国」（即美国）「扣留」。
现状下，台湾和澎湖的2400万居民，就像“在日🇰🇷韩国人民”一样，是“在台🇹🇼中国人民”，而不是“台湾人民”。唯一的区别是，在台湾上，给于占领军将自己的国籍强加在被占领土的居民身上，整个2400万属于「在台🇹🇼人民」，而不属于「台湾的人民」。
1979年的《台湾关系法》今年45岁。请阅读《台湾关系法》的英语原版本，您会发现提示。 45年前，美国国会议员知道日本没有将台湾割让给任何中国。
马关条约----> 旧金山和平条约----> 2758号决议不涉台湾----> 台湾关系法= 无论是中国人民，还是自称为「在台🇹🇼人民」的台湾居民，都不会享有台湾的主权。推动华独只是死路一条。这是美国对二战后台湾的铁则。美国说了算。
1858年的《瑷珲条约》和1860年的《北京条约》中，青帝国将外满洲割让给了俄罗斯帝国。赶快去恢复「我国」丢失领土。
Article 10 of the Taipei Peace Treaty stipulates that “nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all the inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores).” Therefore the Taipei Peace Treaty transferred Japans sovereignty of Taiwan to ALL the inhabitants living of the island NOT to mainland China.
The inhabitants in 1952 were the ROC escapees, Taiwanese Aborigines, Japanese descendants, Dutch descendants, Portuguese descendants, previous Chinese descendants. As you stated, the island was not ceded to the PRC
@@vietnguyen4312 -
Article 10 of the “Nikka Peace Treaty” (日華講和条約) seems to impart a veneer of legitimacy to the Jan. 1, 1946 (retroactive to October 25, 1945) forced mass nationalization of the native inhabitants of UN forces-occupied Japanese Taiwan. But you are imparting article 10 of that treaty with too much, too deep meaning.
Japan having stripped its former Komins of Japanese Taiwan of their Japanese nationality effective April 28, 1952, the latter needed an “ausweiss” or a “laissez passer”, or “travel documents” to travel between Japan and Taiwan. When article 10 of the treaty says “are deemed”, they are only deemed. That is all there is to it.
Besides, the population of Taiwan is deemed such and such “for the purpose of the present treaty.” The September 29, 1972, normalization of diplomatic relations between Japan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), resulted in voiding the Treaty of Taipei. Some have concluded that the population of Taiwan is legally stateless as a result.
Which segues into the issue of absence of international recognition of the “governing authorities ON Taiwan” (在台治理當局, TRA terminology) and the confusion between state sovereignty and popular sovereignty.
The Treaty of Taipei could not supersede the San Francisco Peace Treaty. The Japanese government concluded a bilateral treaty of peace that could not grant the Chinese regime in exile ON Taiwan “greater advantages than those extended to the parties to the San Francisco Peace Treaty,” or the 49 signatories of the SFPT could all claim Taiwan (San Francisco Peace Treaty Article 26).
Furthermore, the government of Japan had already lost territorial rights and the capacity to cede Taiwan when it signed the Treaty of Taipei. The Japanese government, having lost its territorial rights in the SFPT, could not transfer the sovereignty of Taiwan to the Chinese exiled regime ON Taiwan (TRA terminology).
Owing to 50 years spent in bondage under the Chinese occupier’s straw sandal, the Taiwanese electorate is keen on popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty is the capacity of the electorate to get representatives mindful of their mission of keeping a government accountable to the people.
State sovereignty, on the other hand, refers to the legal authority and responsibility of an independent state to govern and regulate its political affairs without foreign interference. Sovereign states have supreme authority over their territory.
But US-DOS says that “the governing authorities ON Taiwan” do not enjoy the sovereignty of Taiwan, are not a state and that Taiwan is not independent, albeit not Chinese either.
Earlier this year, a comment Miles Yu (余茂春) made in a Taiwan-related video program caught my attention. He said that he would lobby to get the TRA amended, to erase the ungainly “the people ON Taiwan” from the text of the act.
I reached into the text of the TRA to compare the two English and Chinese language versions. There are 8 mentions of “the people ON Taiwan” and 6 mentions of “the governing authorities ON Taiwan”.
Of the 8 mentions of “the people ON Taiwan” in the original, the Chinese version uses the correct “在台人民” translation only once, the first time. In all its other occurrences, the phrase is translated “台灣人民” (Taiwanese people) or “台灣之人民” (people of Taiwan).
Of the 6 mentions of “the governing authorities ON Taiwan” in the original version, the Chinese version manages to correctly translate none. Instead, of “governing authorities ON Taiwan” (correct translation: 在台統治當局 or 在台治理當局), the Chinese version reads “Taiwan governing authorities” (台灣統治當局，台灣治理當局).
Coached by US-DOS briefings until Kissinger kowtowed to Chou en-lai over the “undetermined international status” issue, Congress had purposefully come up with this weird phrasing, “the people ON Taiwan” and “the governing authorities ON Taiwan”. It all flows from San Francisco Peace Treaty territorial dispositions article 2 (b).
Allow me to dot my I’s and cross my T’s here. You will be Chinese as long as you deem yourselves the “🇹🇼people ON Taiwan" (在台🇹🇼人民, TRA terminology).
Shimonoseki Treaty → San Francisco Peace Treaty → UN Resolution 2758 does not impinge on Taiwan’s undecided international status → Taiwan Relations Act: Neither the peoples of China nor the deluded 24 million who deem themselves the “🇹🇼people ON Taiwan" (在台🇹🇼人民, TRA terminology) can enjoy Taiwan's sovereignty. This is the United States' ironclad position on post-WWII Taiwan. The United States has the final say.
The Chinese from both shores of the strait are going to tell me that it is a domestic law of the USA and that no Chinese should bother with its content. But this betrayal of the letter of the TRA and of the intent of Congress had consequences on Lee Teng-hui, Chen Shui-bian, Tsai Ing-wen and, currently, Lai Ching-te’s tenures.
As CEOs of the “governing authorities ON Taiwan”, they condoned and implemented the localization of an alien regime that is robbing Taiwan of its place among the nations. It should raise eyebrows both in the U.S.A. and ON Taiwan.
I learned without surprise that the mangled translation, a blatant betrayal of the intent of Congress, was the deed of the Chinese KMT through AmCham Taiwan. But since AIT is hosting both the English and Chinese versions on its website, AIT and US-DOS should be held accountable before Congress for their inadequate oversight of the translation. That makes AIT accessory to the Chinese KMT’s contempt of Congress.
While you are officially deeming yourselves Chinese, you are living the Chinese lie of Chinese Taiwan ON non-Chinese Taiwan. And you are giving the lie a new lease on life until Taiwan is ripe to fall into China’s lap. Don’t blame it on the messenger when you are officially deeming yourselves Chinese. Place the blame where blame belongs.
- - - - - - - - - -
日華平和条約（日本国と中華民国との間の平和条約） 第十条
この条約の適用上、中華民国の国民には、台湾及び澎湖諸島のすべての住民及び以前にそこの住民であつた者並びにそれらの子孫で、台湾及び澎湖諸島において中華民国が現に施行し、又は今後施行する法令によつて中国の国籍を有するものを含むものとみなす。また、中華民国の法人には、台湾及び澎湖諸島において中華民国が現に施行し、又は今後施行する法令に基いて登録されるすべての法人を含むものとみなす。
Japan-China Peace Treaty (Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of China) Article 10
For the purposes of this Treaty, nationals of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all inhabitants and former inhabitants of Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, as well as their descendants who have Chinese nationality in accordance with the laws and regulations now or hereafter enacted by the Republic of China in Taiwan and the Penghu Islands. Furthermore, corporations of the Republic of China shall be deemed to include all corporations registered in accordance with the laws and regulations now or hereafter enacted by the Republic of China in Taiwan and the Penghu Islands.
San Francisco Pece Treaty Article 23
(a) The present Treaty shall be ratified by the States which sign it, including Japan, and will come into force for all the States which have then ratified it, when instruments of ratification have been deposited by Japan and by a majority, including the United States of America as the principal occupying Power, of the following States, namely Australia, Canada, Ceylon, France, Indonesia, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Republic of the Philip pines, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America. The present Treaty shall come into force for each State which subsequently ratifies it, on the date of the deposit of its instrument of ratification.
San Francisco Pece Treaty Article 26
Japan will be prepared to conclude with any State which signed or adhered to the United Nations Declaration of January 1, 1942, 1 and which is at war with Japan, or with any State which previously formed a part of the territory of a State named in Article 23, which is not a signatory of the present Treaty, a bilateral Treaty of Peace on the same or substantially the same terms as are provided for in the present Treaty, but this obligation on the part of Japan will expire three years after the first coming into force of the present Treaty. Should Japan make a peace settlement or war claims settlement with any State granting that State greater advantages than those provided by the present Treaty, those same advantages shall be extended to the parties to the present Treaty.
@@jeromebesson Whether you consider Taiwan a country or not does not automatically cede the island of Taiwan to the PRC.
There are no internationally recognised treaties, policies or UN resolutions that state that Taiwan is part of China. Also, historically, China has had minimal control over the island of Taiwan, I will explain further below.
Now some facts about Taiwan:
1: The island now known as Taiwan was inhabited and ruled by the aborigines for approximately 30,000 years.
2: When the Dutch arrived in 1626 most of the population of Formosa were the Yuanzhumin or Gaoshan people (who have no DNA link back to China)
3: The Qing government (who were NOT Chinese) had minimal control of Taiwan in fact the Qing only managed to rule less than 20% of the island while the aborigines ruled and controlled over 80% of the island. The Qing created a border in 1750 with rocks which was called the Tu Niu Red Line. The Japanese were the first country to colonise Formosa and create roads and infrastructure..
4: Due to the lack of control, the Qing did not declare Formosa a Province of the Qing until 1885 as the Japanese was encroaching on the island. The island was handed to Japan soon after.
5: Over the past 400 years the island has been partially ruled by 5 different governments but it was only the Japanese and ROC who had full control of the entire island.
6: Historically the CCP recognized Formosan independence. In 1936, when the Republic of China (ROC) was China’s government and Taiwan (Formosa) was a Japanese colony, Chairman Mao Zedong offered support to Korea and Formosa if their peoples wished to gain independence from Japan. Mao’s internationalist position suggested that 1) both Korea and Formosa have a right to independence, and 2) this is based on the right to self-determination. Mao did not claim that Taiwan has been an integral part of China. (look up Edgar Snow interview))
7: The Cairo Declaration 1943 discussed the possibility of handing the island of Taiwan to the ROC. This discussion required a treaty to become official and was never implemented.
8: The PRC constitution was formed in 1949 yet Taiwan was not added to it until 1978.
9: The ROC were granted a caretaker role of Formosa after WW2 but when the ROC escaped to the island it still legally belonged to Japan.
10: When Japan relinquished its sovereignty of Taiwan with The Treaty of San Francisco after the ROC invaded the Japanese island, China was not even invited. The treaty was signed by 49 nations but both the ROC and CCP were NOT present.
11: The One China Policy, Un Resolution 2758 or the Treaty of San Francisco do not declare that Taiwan is a province of China. There are no internationally recognized treaties, policies or UN resolutions that state that Taiwan is part of China.
The only legal way that Taiwan can amalgamate with China is if they agree to a treaty ceding their sovereignty. Whether Taiwan is considered a country or not does not automatically grant China with sovereignty of the region.
@@vietnguyen4312
Where have I ever written that Taiwan had been ceded to China, to any China one way or another? Although I totally agree with the content of your comment, I resent the fact that you introduce it as if I allocated Taiwan to any China.
You demonstrate a lot of brass, relying negatively on my comment as you do to state exactly what I have always been claiming in all my comments over many years. Please, save your otherwise commendable comment to paste it under every future “Taiwan Talks” episode, and have it pinned there by “Taiwan Talks”. I will always give it a thumb up.
But, please, pretty please, do it independently of my comments and refrain from pretending that you misunderstood the content of my own comments.
@@vietnguyen4312
I disagree with your conclusion that "the Taipei Peace Treaty transferred Japan's sovereignty of Taiwan to ALL the inhabitants living of the island." You are falling into the -- Oh so -- Chinese and now Taiwanese foible of interpreting the content of the treaty as they see fit. You are also confusing state sovereignty and popular sovereignty.
At the time of the San Francisco Peace Conference, Taiwan was still Japanese territory, albeit militarily occupied like the rest of Japan. During six year of occupation, the Chinese military government was bent on annexing Japanese Taiwan in total disregard of international law.
Misrepresenting themselves as governors of Taiwan province of China, Chen Yi (29/08/1945 - 22/04/1945), Wei Dao-ming (16/05/1947 - 05/01/1949), Chen Cheng (05/01/1949 - 21/12/1949) and K.C. Wu (21/12/1949 - 16-04/1953) failed to establish the "Tai-Peng Advisory Council” (台澎諮詢會) as embryo of a future government of Tai-Peng.
As a result, when the San Francisco Peace Conference was held, no Taiwan government had been established under the command of the Chinese military government and there was no representative of any Taiwan government on hand to receive from Japan recognition of Taiwanese independence.
After April 28, 1952, the Republic of China armed forces garrisoned as occupation forces ON Taiwan and their notorious Taiwan Garrison Command (September 1945 - 1 August 1992) should have morphed into the Republic of China Civil Administration Of Tai-Peng (ROCCATP)). And the early "Tai-Peng Advisory Council” (台澎諮詢會) should have morphed into the government of Tai-Peng (台澎政府) headed by a popularly elected Taiwanese governor under ROCCATP overseight.
In actuality, “the governing authorities ON Taiwan (在台治理當局, TRA terminology) managed to establish a semblance of that government of Tai-Peng (台澎政府) when they established the now moth-balled (July 2018) Taiwan Provincial Government (臺灣省政府) on May 16, 1947.
Hopefully, the Taiwan regime will kindly return autonomous territories to ethnic minorities in the mainland
Korean has also claim northern part of china 😂😂😂
👏🌞🙏
Set your claims back to the Creation discovery By Abraham.
ArabicReja973 -> anti China propaganda bot
lastChang -> anti China propaganda bot
No worries. If taiwan does not want to unite with china, just press a w ar button with china. (US has been waiting very impatiently for taiwan to do so 👍👍) Taiwan success rate? Zero. W ar victory lies in only 1 factor - numbers of p ple willing to sacrifice for the country ( china win based on quantity), given both china and taiwan have the same advanced artillery.
Russia and China are best friends but don't forget the North Korea though...😂
Another japanese president after Tsai.
Very sad Taiwanese people's fate is decided by Chinese and Americans.
👀👀👀👀👀
Says the one with the constitution claiming the entire territory of the former Qing Dynasty... Hypocrisy at its finest
❤
He behave like one. If he dye his hair color to blonde, I can't tell the difference.
Lai lies again.
Congrats Republic of Taiwan! 😍😍😍😍
Congrats Republic of Hongkong! 😍😍😍😍
Congrats Republic of Taiwan! 😍😍😍😍