Governments are built they don’t come out of thin air. The people must want that type of rule in order to enforce it. Even if every one claims to be Muslim. If they don’t want that type of government they won’t have it🤦🏾. You don’t know that’s how the world works right? People have to WILLINGLY agree and implement all of those laws. It CANT be imposed just because you say it’s Islamic.
Let’s talk about real religion that is the greatest threat to family unit.liberalism is built upon two ideas: maximum freedom and maximum equality. Both of these ideas are erroneous because human behavior has to be restrictaed for the greater good therefore negating maximum freedom. Maximum equality is not possible due to differences in knowledge which establishes hierarchy. We must subjugate ourselves to law of Allah(one/indivisible/self-sufficient/All-loving perfection)) who has totality of data, therefore being the only one that has the right to legislate.
Surah Al-Imran 3:102 يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ حَقَّ تُقَاتِهِۦ وَلَا تَمُوتُنَّ إِلَّا وَأَنتُم مُّسْلِمُونَ ١٠٢ O believers! Be mindful of Allah in the way He deserves, and do not die except in ˹a state of full˺ submission ˹to Him˺. اے ایمان لانے والو ! اللہ سے ڈرو جیسا کہ اس سے ڈرنے کا حق ہے ۔ تم کو موت نہ آئے مگر اس حال میں کہ تم مسلم ہو۔ Ey, iymon keltirganlar! Allohga haqiqiy taqvo ila taqvo qiling. Va faqat musulmon holingizdagina bu dunyodan o`ting. Wahai orang-orang yang beriman! Bertakwalah kepada Allah sebenar-benar takwa kepada-Nya dan janganlah kamu mati kecuali dalam keadaan Muslim. হে মু’মিনগণ! আল্লাহকে ভয় কর যেমনভাবে তাঁকে ভয় করা উচিত। তোমরা মুসলিম না হয়ে কক্ষনো মরো না। О те, которые уверовали! Бойтесь Аллаха должным образом и умирайте не иначе, как будучи мусульманами! ای کسانیکه ایمان آوردهاید! از الله؛ آن گونه که شایسته ترسیدن از او است؛ بترسید، و نمیرید مگر اینکه مسلمان باشید. Ey iman edenler! Allah'tan, O'na yaraşır şekilde korkun ve ancak müslümanlar olarak can verin. ऐ ईमान वालो! अल्लाह से डरो, जैसा कि उससे डरना चाहिए तथा तुम्हारी मृत्यु न आए परंतु इस स्थिति में कि तुम मुसलमान हो।
Assalamu alaykum brother! Please help raise awareness about the hijab ban in Tajikistan 🇹🇯. The government has banned the wearing of the hijab and is fining and arresting hijabis on the streets. They imprison anyone who publicly disagrees with them, and we literally don't know what to do. Please pray for us and help in raising awareness.
Because once he does so he will be bound by Quran other verses otherwise he will fall under Quranic threat; {do you believe in some of the book and disbelieve in some ? .. then what is the punishment for who does this except shamesnes in this life and in the hereafter they turn to the most severe torture}.
Chapters: 00:00:00 - The Relationship Between Government and Religion in Islam 00:06:26 - Different Paradigms and Societies 00:11:33 - The Role of Religion in Political Systems 00:16:49 - Religious Freedom and Universal Values 00:21:47 - The Responsibility in Islam and Maximizing Freedom 00:27:12 - Critique of American foreign policy and liberalism 00:32:46 - Restricting Religious Freedom for Muslims 00:38:22 - The Freedom of Morality vs. Immorality in Muslim Countries 00:43:41 - Political Values and Ideas 00:48:43 - Persecution and Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan 00:53:32 - The Double Standards of Free Speech 00:58:31 - The Paradox of Political Freedom and the Middle East 01:03:29 - Religious Coercion in Muslim Majority Societies 01:09:04 - The Misogyny of Yas 01:14:18 - The Sharia in the Modern Nation State 01:19:33 - Controversial discussions on Western notions 01:25:13 - The Controversy Surrounding Sharia Law 01:30:23 - The Challenges of Implementing Islamic Law in Modern Society 01:35:59 - The Caliphate and Political Models in Islam 01:41:12 - The Influence of Politics on Religion 01:46:18 - The responsibility of Western powers in preventing genocide 01:51:27 - The Ban on Alcohol in Muslim Society 01:57:12 - Tensions in Muslim Societies 02:02:40 - Common Ground and Differentiation in Religious Values and Government 02:08:22 - Yas as a Scholar 02:13:58 - The Role of Religion in Government 02:19:57 - The Dawa Mafia Scandal
Another sad thing to take note of is that Yasir Qahdi is a very popular and widespread voice among American Muslims who don't know about who he really is. Therefore, they still follow his talking points and share his content. We MUST let other Muslims know that he is not to be followed and brother Daniel has already helped by making the videos for us to educate others. Let's do our part.
Tbf to him, it's because he has done some exceptional scholarly work. His seerah series. His series on the battle of Karbala and historical context. These are all pretty well-researched and honest about the facts. His interpretation of Islamic things is lacking for many of us, but he does the hard scholarly work of researching and presenting the facts. That's how he gained an audience, imo. Much of his audience is not as liberal as him, I've noticed
@@fark69 he cannot change the facts that's why those series are compelling. However, he is an outright reformist and that's the issue. No one ever questioned his seerah series as far as i know. Everybody is calling him out for his nonsense interpretation of the deen with eloquent words
I just noticed that in the beginning the host is saying "both of them have a desire to cultivate just society". That means the presupposition of both liberal is Islamic society is unjust. That's where their beginning.
Being raised in the US and receiving a liberalist education, I am the exact kind of Muslim that is vulnerable to the secularist message. I appreciate this channel for promoting yaqeen of Islam. Jazakallahair.
YQ is speaking like a politician, not as a religious scholar. I advise him to take off his mask and work as an activist instead of confusing laymen Muslims who are following him.
"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended." --- Frederic Bastiat I'm constantly disappointed in YQ.
Qadhi is a waffler. As a Muslim , Allah is above all things, the Quran is what we judge by and live with,so the Islamic law is above every man made law or way of life.
YQ followers always make excuses for him, just so that they can continue to follow "Islam light" a.k.a secularism. The problem is just like Brother Daniel said, YQ slithers around in his speech so that he seems like a sunni Muslim and a secular at the same time. Akyol has just nothing to do with Islam, I don't know who that guy is or if he is Muslim. A lot of their points are just "we shouldn't do this" 1 hour in I haven't heard one "Allah said" or "our Prophet said" from these guys. We know that YQ is american first. thats why he says "we invaded..." his inferiority complex for being brown is just pathetic
(O Prophet), when the hypocrites come to you, they say: “We bear witness that you are certainly Allah's Messenger.” Allah certainly knows that you are His Messenger. But Allah also bears witness that the hypocrites are utter liars! (63:1) for YQ fans.
20:14 Overthrow of Abdul Hameed was the biggest tragedy for the ummah in the last century. It breaks my heart to hear so called refined turks such as this guy stating the atrocity imposed on them by the western empires so proudly as an accomplishment of his nation state.
You seem to have a very idealized, pedestalized view of the Ottoman Empire. The rot was already far too advanced by 1909 when the Young Turks overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and in many ways, he was part of the rot. I like to think that maybe if things were a bit different, he might have gotten around to harnessing some of his personal potential towards setting things onto a better path, but as it was, he failed, badly.
Islam is beyond reform. Let us remind Yasir Qadi of what Allah(swt) says about His(swt) religion in the Quran, Chapter 5, Verse 3: "This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islām as religion." Sahih International If Yasir Qadi is not pleased with this statement of Allah(swt), then he should choose another religion or create one.
According to Yq point of view qawm lut has the right to practice 🏳️🌈🤮 Because they all accept it, and the prophet lut didn't have the right to forbid it, and he was even a kharijee
It’s very sad and terrifying that we have people like these so called Scholars liberalising the religion of Islam when God is the one who legislated the religion.
The most alarming aspect in this debate is that you can't tell who is the Islamic theologian and who isn't because both essentially sound the same due to their liberal frame of thinking. 🤦♂️ Historic levels of incompetence from a "Islamic theologian". Aykol is a known liberal so he spoke as expected but YQ was BEYOND TERRIBLE.
He is a deviant. Ibn Taymiyyah says: “So, after knowing what the messenger has come with, we know by necessity that he has not legislated for his nation to call upon anyone from the dead, not the prophets, the righteous ones, or anyone other than them; not in the wording of Isthighatha or other than it, and not in the wording of Isti'anah or other than it. Just like how he has not legislated for his nation to prostrate to the dead, to one that isn't dead, or the likes of that. Rather, we know that he has forbidden us from all these affairs, and this is from amongst the Sh*rk that Allah and his messenger forbade. But due to the increase of ignorance and lack of knowledge of the Athar of the message amongst many of those who came later on, Takf*r can't be done on them until what the mesenger came with becomes clear to them from that which opposes it.” الاستغاثة ٤١١
@@shant2464@shant2464 In his saint-grave-worship-not- shirk remarks he starts by saying he has changed his position from shirk to not-shirk. So are you saying he's changed again? Is that who you will take guidance from? Might as well join a church.
Whether he changed his opinion or not, this debate proves he doesn't regard the shari'ah as the ultimate and irrefutable law of Allah for him to think of reforming it, astaghfirullah.. There is only 1 Islam wherever you maybe..
What a great video, Jazakallah kheyr brother, this is my third comment because you're taking me through different stages of enjoyment and 'izzah of deen. Mashallah tabarakallah for your work and may Allah bless you and your family akh
@@noneofyourbusiness-hg7mk A western Scholar for dollar whose opinions are openly against classical Islāmic Aqeedah, are must to be exposed publically, it's been the tradition of Ummah since the time of Sahaba, otherwise Deen wouldn't stay purified if there was no open criticism of scholarship based on Objective Criteria of Judgement which the likes of Yasir, Omer Sulaiman, & other west-backed "scholars" propogate.
How could this be called a debate though ?! .. both Qadi and Mustafa were complementing each other on almost every thing .. dishonest title which goes perfectly with the dishonest nature of both participants.
The verse that comes to my mind Whenever Qadhi speaks about change.. When it is said to them, “Do not spread disorder on the earth”, they say, “We are but reformers.”
I just reached 1:02:11 and had to pause to make this comment: He says the US attacking Al-Qaeda (by invading Afghanistan) is "debatable" whether it was right or wrong. If we want to look at it from Purely international law then it's not debatable at all. If a country experiences a terrorist attack, they cannot simply start bombing another country to get ahold of the suspected terrorist. They will have to provide sufficient evidence. The US refused an investigation into 9/11. They simply told us what happened. They refused to provide any evidence to Afghanistan that a group is responsible for the attack. This guy is a Turkish. He should know that in 2016 there was a coup attempt by Gulen, a terrorist organization. Their leader was residing in the US. If the US was a weak country would it be " debatable" for turkey to invade it ?
Why did Quraysh become extremely violent against prophet Muhammad pbuh and the Muslims? It had nothing to do with the 5 prayers, or fasting, or zakat. They didnt even care if someone believed in one God or even the idols. The prophet pbuh believed in one God, before revelation came to him. He used to go to mount Hira and worship Allah before he got revelation, and yet Quraysh loved him and had no problem with him doing any of that. When did they start having a problem with the prophet pbuh? It was after Allah revealed, "You, wrapped in your clothes. Arise and WARN ALL". (Al Muddathir 1-2). Quraysh was afraid that this message would bring on social, economic, and political change. A change that is not welcome if you were already at the top. They wanted to keep the status quo. Islam has to do with EVERY aspect of your life, and that includes politics. Like Quraysh, the secular world dont actually care if you pray 5 times or even 50 times a day in your home. But they are afraid of the change that Islam brings to everyone's life. They are afraid of it mainly because it goes against their desires.
They don't care if Islam goes against their desires, they care when Islam doesn't allow a minority to take advantages of the majority, filling their pockets and impoverishing the masses.
This “Debate” seems to me like some Saudi solution for persuasion. In other words, a PsyOp. They brought 2 reformers to “Debate” each other, but it simply is all about yielding the floor to Qadhi so as to make the Viewers think that his Liberal Position of Reform is Indisputable.
Yasir Qadhi is people pleaser, changes the fatwas according to his desire... May Allah swt give us true guidance and allow us to follow each every sunnah of our beloved Prohpet muhammad (saw)
Notice, when YQ addressing muslims he talks from Qur’an, Sunnah, passionate islamic speeches, but as soon as he is on secular platforms, he goes along with them.
00:19 Debate between Yasir Qadhi and Mustafa Akyol 03:02 Government and religion relationship in Islam 07:08 Yasir Qadhi uses vague responses to appeal to liberal values 09:03 Debate highlights differing perspectives on religion and politics 12:50 Debate on the separation of religion and government 14:47 Debate on the separation of government and religion 18:21 Advocating for religious freedom and universal values 20:10 Discussion on the impact of European ideas on Turkey's legal system 23:43 Imposed morality through coercion leads to hypocrisy and resentment 25:28 Balancing freedom and morality in different cultures 29:03 Critique of Western liberalism's imposition and legacy of dominance 30:58 Respecting local autonomy and organic change 34:45 Liberalism's view of religious freedom is not applied in reality 36:22 Yasir Qadhi debunks the claim of contesting religious freedom 39:52 Muslims should not assume all religions are correct. 41:45 Restriction of false religions and practices in Sharia 45:05 The importance of religious freedom and respecting individual choices. 46:47 Discussion on the impact of Western media on Muslim communities 49:51 Yasir Qadhi opposes endorsing the law of blasphemy in Islamic societies. 51:28 Local Pakistanis should decide how to address blasphemy laws. 54:43 Respect and abide by the law of the land, with room for criticism and change. 56:24 Freedom to worship and personal life should not harm others, an Islamic and Universal Freedom. 59:51 A problematization of the assumption that freedom and democracy are good for all 1:01:24 Discussing complexities of freedom and democracy 1:04:46 Debate on religious freedom and coercion 1:06:47 Debate on freedom in Muslim societies 1:10:21 Discussion on societal norms and decency levels 1:11:59 Women's freedom leading to nudity in public 1:15:14 Application of Sharia in a nation state is not about copying every law verbatim. 1:17:04 Yasir Qadhi's position on the nation state and Sharia limitations. 1:20:36 Islam does not impose requirements on people. 1:22:24 Debate on ethical and moral issues 1:26:04 Criticism of Yasir Qadhi's responses on sensitive religious topics 1:28:02 Religion's role in shaping natural values 1:31:05 Debating the necessity and feasibility of a caliphate in a secular society 1:33:02 Advocating for a modern nation state absorbing Islamic values 1:36:40 Debate on Islamic nation establishment 1:38:25 Discussion on the concept of caliphate in Islam 1:41:49 Bible's preservation questioned, Quran's clarity highlighted 1:43:31 Exploring a new version of a caliphate 1:46:48 Government's role in making sins legal or illegal 1:48:40 Discussion on the balance between personal piety and public order regarding alcohol consumption. 1:51:50 Yasir Qadhi discusses approach to alcohol ban 1:53:51 Calling out prominent figures for inexcusable mistakes 1:57:31 Alcohol consumption in Turkish society and societal tensions around religious practices 1:59:14 Social enforcement of Islamic values in traditional societies 2:02:56 Both cautious about coercive theological state, differing on level of religious values in politics 2:04:43 Debate on enforcing Quran laws and punishment 2:08:45 Encouraging Islamic morality in governance 2:10:30 Debate limitations on liberal ISM and Islamic law enforcement 2:14:17 Islam advocates for certain freedoms, not absolute freedom 2:16:15 Debate on religious freedom and its impact on society 2:20:23 Yasir Qadhi discusses feminism
Yasir Qadi being spinless the entire "debate" is just so typical at this point. I am surprised he still has any Muslims who are subscribed to him and take him seriously.
2:11:33 there was no public demand for Islam when the Prophet peace be upon him started preaching nor when Essa, nor Nooh nor Lut nor Hud, nor Salah , nor Ibrahim alahim-es-salam started preaching. So we know with whom Akyol would have stood in those times.
The laws against blasphemy aren't the problem, but maybe the implementation of the Pakistani state is. You can't just accuse someone of blasphemy, without any proof and witnesses in shari'a law. If Pakistan does so, it's wrong. Does that mean, that the whole law itself is wrong? It's God's law!
I love you Daniel for the sake of Allah (Swt). MaShaAllah! Jazaka’Allahu Ahsanal Jaza! You are a gift for Muslim ummah specially for western… Keep up the great work!
That doesn't make any sense, shouldnt YQ be debating a non reformist traditional MUSLIM......oh wait I get it, they're debating what rout a reformist should take
I don't really think this is true, tbh. Ayakol is more in line with what you're saying. I think he sees that the US government views the idea that Islam is one law which is superior to secular laws and should be implemented worldwide to benefit people at the expense of the current rulers as a huge threat and he doesn't want the gov't to go harder on Muslims so he portrays this double mask version of Islam. But I'm just guessing
Yasir "Mr. My personal ijtihaad" Qadhi tries to play all sides. When he speaks, it actually reminds me of a verse I read in the New Testament before my conversion to Islam. It's a quote by Paul, the true founder of Christianity, where he says " I have become all things to all men". Before any Yasir Q. fanboys get into a hissy, I am not making takfir of him, I'm just commenting on the similarity of the mindset between the two. YQ flip flops way too much to be trusted. If I'm not mistaken, I believe years ago he was more inclined towards the pseudo-salafi/wahhaabi cult, which wouldn't be surprising, in that many who originally have those leanings, often eventually go to the other extreme.
I've never listened to Yasir qadi before .Whenever I come across his videos I would skip him. He talks differently to most Islamic scholars. He doesn't make sense
Then my brother trust me you are missing a lot. Despite Daniel's personal opinion of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi he is indeed a legit scholar with vast knowledge of Islam. Go listen to the long lectures of his and compare his opinions with classical scholars of the past and you would find that his views are rooted from them. Daniel, I don't doubt his intentions but I do doubt his level of in-depth knowledge.
I do think Qadhi is wrong about this topic, but many of his series and speeches, especially when they deal with history, are well researched and worth watching. He may not be right about everything, but he does have some good scholarship also
I always wanted Daniel to review debates, this should be fun.
7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7
Jazak Allah kheir brother Daniel for exposing these cowards they shoyld male dua to Allah subhana for courage with imman yakkin specialy for a scholar may Allah subhana guide us all ameen ya rahima rabbi Allah.
The problem is of psychology not ilm..... He lives in inferior state of psychology... Where one is afraid to tell what they really believe...whats fundamentally true in their beliefs.... Because they might be judged.... Bros... We must be okay being judged... Islam is superior... There is a man made system vs system of Allah.... Ofcourse the system of Allah is perfect and superior... Lets just say it un apologetically
If he claims that the Quraa'n is not preserved he is then a disbeliever. If he believes that Islams ,values, laws or way which Allah has revealed is equal to anything else or there is a better value law etc., he is then a disbeliever.
The debate or to be more accurate the dialogue itself was a very nice one and as you can see, the conversation was very civilised between both parties. The only issue is that the Islamic perspective was completely missing.
As a muslim living in the west my whole life, sheikh Qadhi was one of the best sheikhs to help my a lot closer to my deen and Allah. Now I see what brother Daniel is trying to say BUT I’m sure that Qadhi, Nouman Ali Khan and others approach helped thousands if not millions of Muslim in the west back/closer to Islam. They are doing a lot of good work available with a single click. Tbh growing up in Europe I am sure that a stricter approach would not have helped me personally. Therefore they are much needed for a certain group of young Muslims. I am sure that sheikh Qadhi has a lot of beneficial knowledge put out there for every Muslim, pick and choose, but for example the more than 300 hours of seerah of sahaba or even more of seerah of prophet Muhammad ﷺ. I also appreciate brother Daniel’s work and benefit from it, but think he’s to hard on sheikh
I understand your position brother but Islam is not a tolerant religion especially in terms of “reform” when it comes to the Deen and Fatwa. May Allah protect us from those that cause confusion, Ameen Ya Rabb
@@Quantum-1157 did you read any thing I wrote? I clearly say that I understand Daniel, which therefore means these things are not good, otherwise I wouldn’t accept it from Daniel. However, I’m talking about me, and millions of Muslims were brought back to Islam by YQ and NAK, and that they have tons of useful information easily available for the Muslim youth. Does this not affect you that a Muslim came back because of their help, or that many others also either found Islam or came back? I don’t need to talk about ulama in any bad way as all Muslims have done wrong before, or are you not human and make mistakes? Try and understand what I mean instead of attacking, look at the previous comment who said he’s opinion, but clearly with some Islamic tarbya. Learn how to express yourself, especially with other Muslims who haven’t wronged you in any way.
@@El-Mariachi-Classicsdo you also not think they have the opposite effect, misguide millions due to NAK n Qadhi beliefs, like beliefs about holes in Quran narratives of both men, also no believing in hadiis that were strong, a munafiq can write many books on truth n facts, but don’t you think it crosses the line when they say Allahs word is wrong, the Quran is wrong.
@@El-Mariachi-Classicswhen can you throw away the baby with the bath water, when they say the Quran and strong hadiis are wrong. Throw those MFS away period. Please stop making excuses for them. If you don’t agree with the basics of Islam then what are you really preaching if not misguidance. I am glad you feel he helped you but your lack of understanding their grave error is very concerning.
@@shugridualle5566 calling them mfs, is a huge sin.. says a lot about you who pretend to be strict Muslim. May Allah guide and forgive you. Beware of your tongue
Should Islam be the law? Yaseer: Colonialism, theory of nation states, one rule all scenarios, pros and cons of all systems+$!"!+##($($!$;:3-$-";!#(#7$+7"!!$..... Muslim: Yes.
According to Mustafa Akyol: Imposing religious rules = bad Imposing secular laws = good Yasir Qadhi barely made a dent in this "debate" - it was practically 2 people agreeing with eachother 95% of the time, with their framework being more or less the same. May Allah guide them and us. Jazak'Allah khair for your work. I enjoyed this episode. Love your humor.
I love how Daniel catches the contradiction of Yasir's American approach to social change vs his advice to Muftis in Pakistan (whose hands are really tied, Yasir's or the Mufti's? Lol) I have one question: In the absence of a Khalifa, every single Muslim majority country has "organically" (in accord with both western culture and their culture) pursued what they thInk is their balance of religion and state,; and thats whats to be expected in rhe absence of a Khalifa. When we had Caliphates in the past they were also all different from one another depending on what form of popular Aqeeda they adopted at the time (or is there a belief that every form of Aqeeda that every Sultan mandated was always the aqeeda of ahl el sunnah wal Jamaah?)
I don't like yasir qahdi . After the few times he has almost brought fitna with the previous complaints of his in terms of preservation of the Quran. And yajuj and majuj and alluding to modernize the interpretations of the Quran. He has caused more issues than help to Islam imo. Allah wallum. I just think he's a bit of a hypocrite. Caters to where his bread is buttered.
As soon as I started listening to the interview I turned it off right away when I heard Yasir Qadi talking about there is no law that fits every part of the world. He is clearly wrong. We have that law and that is Allah’s law
We need your generous support: muslimskeptic.com/contribute
salam brother daniel
Governments are built they don’t come out of thin air. The people must want that type of rule in order to enforce it. Even if every one claims to be Muslim. If they don’t want that type of government they won’t have it🤦🏾. You don’t know that’s how the world works right? People have to WILLINGLY agree and implement all of those laws. It CANT be imposed just because you say it’s Islamic.
Let’s talk about real religion that is the greatest threat to family unit.liberalism is built upon two ideas: maximum freedom and maximum equality. Both of these ideas are erroneous because human behavior has to be restrictaed for the greater good therefore negating maximum freedom. Maximum equality is not possible due to differences in knowledge which establishes hierarchy. We must subjugate ourselves to law of Allah(one/indivisible/self-sufficient/All-loving perfection)) who has totality of data, therefore being the only one that has the right to legislate.
in india, gov will arrest if you use Pakistan flag or support Pakistan in a biggest democratic country so this is similar to blasphemy law?
Surah Al-Imran
3:102
يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ٱتَّقُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ حَقَّ تُقَاتِهِۦ وَلَا تَمُوتُنَّ إِلَّا وَأَنتُم مُّسْلِمُونَ ١٠٢
O believers! Be mindful of Allah in the way He deserves, and do not die except in ˹a state of full˺ submission ˹to Him˺.
اے ایمان لانے والو ! اللہ سے ڈرو جیسا کہ اس سے ڈرنے کا حق ہے ۔ تم کو موت نہ آئے مگر اس حال میں کہ تم مسلم ہو۔
Ey, iymon keltirganlar! Allohga haqiqiy taqvo ila taqvo qiling. Va faqat musulmon holingizdagina bu dunyodan o`ting.
Wahai orang-orang yang beriman! Bertakwalah kepada Allah sebenar-benar takwa kepada-Nya dan janganlah kamu mati kecuali dalam keadaan Muslim.
হে মু’মিনগণ! আল্লাহকে ভয় কর যেমনভাবে তাঁকে ভয় করা উচিত। তোমরা মুসলিম না হয়ে কক্ষনো মরো না।
О те, которые уверовали! Бойтесь Аллаха должным образом и умирайте не иначе, как будучи мусульманами!
ای کسانیکه ایمان آوردهاید! از الله؛ آن گونه که شایسته ترسیدن از او است؛ بترسید، و نمیرید مگر اینکه مسلمان باشید.
Ey iman edenler! Allah'tan, O'na yaraşır şekilde korkun ve ancak müslümanlar olarak can verin.
ऐ ईमान वालो! अल्लाह से डरो, जैसा कि उससे डरना चाहिए तथा तुम्हारी मृत्यु न आए परंतु इस स्थिति में कि तुम मुसलमान हो।
Assalamu alaykum brother! Please help raise awareness about the hijab ban in Tajikistan 🇹🇯. The government has banned the wearing of the hijab and is fining and arresting hijabis on the streets. They imprison anyone who publicly disagrees with them, and we literally don't know what to do. Please pray for us and help in raising awareness.
May Allah be with you and make you strong to face these kinds of injustices.
@@Ya39oub_G ameen
It's amazing how YQ didn't mention a single Quranic verse or hadith in a 2h debate.
He mentioned a part of 1 ayat, I think..That too to support his liberal ideas.
Because once he does so he will be bound by Quran other verses otherwise he will fall under Quranic threat; {do you believe in some of the book and disbelieve in some ? .. then what is the punishment for who does this except shamesnes in this life and in the hereafter they turn to the most severe torture}.
Chapters:
00:00:00 - The Relationship Between Government and Religion in Islam
00:06:26 - Different Paradigms and Societies
00:11:33 - The Role of Religion in Political Systems
00:16:49 - Religious Freedom and Universal Values
00:21:47 - The Responsibility in Islam and Maximizing Freedom
00:27:12 - Critique of American foreign policy and liberalism
00:32:46 - Restricting Religious Freedom for Muslims
00:38:22 - The Freedom of Morality vs. Immorality in Muslim Countries
00:43:41 - Political Values and Ideas
00:48:43 - Persecution and Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan
00:53:32 - The Double Standards of Free Speech
00:58:31 - The Paradox of Political Freedom and the Middle East
01:03:29 - Religious Coercion in Muslim Majority Societies
01:09:04 - The Misogyny of Yas
01:14:18 - The Sharia in the Modern Nation State
01:19:33 - Controversial discussions on Western notions
01:25:13 - The Controversy Surrounding Sharia Law
01:30:23 - The Challenges of Implementing Islamic Law in Modern Society
01:35:59 - The Caliphate and Political Models in Islam
01:41:12 - The Influence of Politics on Religion
01:46:18 - The responsibility of Western powers in preventing genocide
01:51:27 - The Ban on Alcohol in Muslim Society
01:57:12 - Tensions in Muslim Societies
02:02:40 - Common Ground and Differentiation in Religious Values and Government
02:08:22 - Yas as a Scholar
02:13:58 - The Role of Religion in Government
02:19:57 - The Dawa Mafia Scandal
Wouls be useful if tgis comment got pinned
Another sad thing to take note of is that Yasir Qahdi is a very popular and widespread voice among American Muslims who don't know about who he really is. Therefore, they still follow his talking points and share his content. We MUST let other Muslims know that he is not to be followed and brother Daniel has already helped by making the videos for us to educate others. Let's do our part.
💯
That's because he is the ideal shaykh who makes every aspect of life easy with regards to the western life by giving his twisted and vague fatwas
Tbf to him, it's because he has done some exceptional scholarly work. His seerah series. His series on the battle of Karbala and historical context. These are all pretty well-researched and honest about the facts. His interpretation of Islamic things is lacking for many of us, but he does the hard scholarly work of researching and presenting the facts. That's how he gained an audience, imo. Much of his audience is not as liberal as him, I've noticed
@@fark69 he cannot change the facts that's why those series are compelling. However, he is an outright reformist and that's the issue. No one ever questioned his seerah series as far as i know. Everybody is calling him out for his nonsense interpretation of the deen with eloquent words
Thanks
I just noticed that in the beginning the host is saying "both of them have a desire to cultivate just society". That means the presupposition of both liberal is Islamic society is unjust. That's where their beginning.
Nationalism/tribalism is NOT part of Islam. Islam is THE way of life and life cannot do without politics. Hence politics is a part of Islam.
Being raised in the US and receiving a liberalist education, I am the exact kind of Muslim that is vulnerable to the secularist message. I appreciate this channel for promoting yaqeen of Islam. Jazakallahair.
Please continue these works, much needed and appreciated
This isn’t a conversation between Muslim ideologies. Sound more like Uncle Sam is talking to a Kamalist
YQ is speaking like a politician, not as a religious scholar. I advise him to take off his mask and work as an activist instead of confusing laymen Muslims who are following him.
fake debate. just agreeing on liberalism
We have not been harmed by the infidels as much as we have been harmed by the hypocrites within the Muslims
"The worst thing that can happen to a good cause is, not to be skillfully attacked, but to be ineptly defended."
--- Frederic Bastiat
I'm constantly disappointed in YQ.
Qadhi is a waffler. As a Muslim , Allah is above all things, the Quran is what we judge by and live with,so the Islamic law is above every man made law or way of life.
I'm really loving this new show, very informative and much needed discussions.
YQ followers always make excuses for him, just so that they can continue to follow "Islam light" a.k.a secularism.
The problem is just like Brother Daniel said, YQ slithers around in his speech so that he seems like a sunni Muslim and a secular at the same time. Akyol has just nothing to do with Islam, I don't know who that guy is or if he is Muslim.
A lot of their points are just "we shouldn't do this" 1 hour in I haven't heard one "Allah said" or "our Prophet said" from these guys. We know that YQ is american first. thats why he says "we invaded..." his inferiority complex for being brown is just pathetic
You nailed it, 100%.
PS: Mustafa Akyol is a self-avowed Sunnah Denier, which actually makes him an apostate.
"Show me where it says in the Quran I shouldn't listen to Yasir Qadhi" - average YQ fan
"Pls dont divide the ummah" - Middle ground fallacists
@@User_47536 ههههههه الوسطية الإسلام المعتدل
That was epic
@@seekfactsnotfiction9056 Epic Masjid
(O Prophet), when the hypocrites come to you, they say: “We bear witness that you are certainly Allah's Messenger.” Allah certainly knows that you are His Messenger. But Allah also bears witness that the hypocrites are utter liars! (63:1) for YQ fans.
@@singalongme1 Astaghfurullah oh ppl fear Allah
IF you didnt tell me this was a debate, I would have thought that this was 2 people who are friends disagreeing on 20% of what they are discussing.
20:14 Overthrow of Abdul Hameed was the biggest tragedy for the ummah in the last century. It breaks my heart to hear so called refined turks such as this guy stating the atrocity imposed on them by the western empires so proudly as an accomplishment of his nation state.
You seem to have a very idealized, pedestalized view of the Ottoman Empire. The rot was already far too advanced by 1909 when the Young Turks overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and in many ways, he was part of the rot. I like to think that maybe if things were a bit different, he might have gotten around to harnessing some of his personal potential towards setting things onto a better path, but as it was, he failed, badly.
Well said!
@@samy7013 I mean Atatürk banned Arabic all together and reading the Qur'an in Arabic
@@fahadmalik8862 Call him Atajew or Atagay 😂
@@User_47536 people are mostly blind and celebrate him. He was in no way a good person. And I wonder who banned the Hijab...? That's... Oh YEAH!
Islam is beyond reform.
Let us remind Yasir Qadi of what Allah(swt) says about His(swt) religion in the Quran, Chapter 5, Verse 3:
"This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islām as religion."
Sahih International
If Yasir Qadi is not pleased with this statement of Allah(swt), then he should choose another religion or create one.
Every progressive Muslim needs to hear this. Properly.
This "debate" showed that a compromised, compassionate version of Islam is more contradictory than secularism.
According to Yq point of view qawm lut has the right to practice 🏳️🌈🤮 Because they all accept it, and the prophet lut didn't have the right to forbid it, and he was even a kharijee
It’s very sad and terrifying that we have people like these so called Scholars liberalising the religion of Islam when God is the one who legislated the religion.
It's one of the reasons why we are so weak...
Great show brother Daniel mashallah. It’s important to expose those who reinterpret the deen and want to reform it before this evil is spread more
The most alarming aspect in this debate is that you can't tell who is the Islamic theologian and who isn't because both essentially sound the same due to their liberal frame of thinking. 🤦♂️
Historic levels of incompetence from a "Islamic theologian".
Aykol is a known liberal so he spoke as expected but YQ was BEYOND TERRIBLE.
I can't finish watching this video.. Can't stand hearing Yassir Qadhi after I heard him say that invoking saints is NOT shirk..
He is a deviant. Ibn Taymiyyah says:
“So, after knowing what the messenger has come with, we know by necessity that he has not legislated for his nation to call upon anyone from the dead, not the prophets, the righteous ones, or anyone other than them; not in the wording of Isthighatha or other than it, and not in the wording of Isti'anah or other than it. Just like how he has not legislated for his nation to prostrate to the dead, to one that isn't dead, or the likes of that. Rather, we know that he has forbidden us from all these affairs, and this is from amongst the Sh*rk that Allah and his messenger forbade. But due to the increase of ignorance and lack of knowledge of the Athar of the message amongst many of those who came later on, Takf*r can't be done on them until what the mesenger came with becomes clear to them from that which opposes it.” الاستغاثة ٤١١
He has changed his stance on saints. People learn and change for the better.
@@shant2464@shant2464 In his saint-grave-worship-not- shirk remarks he starts by saying he has changed his position from shirk to not-shirk. So are you saying he's changed again? Is that who you will take guidance from? Might as well join a church.
@@shant2464do his followers know? Did he make a public apology/retraction?
Whether he changed his opinion or not, this debate proves he doesn't regard the shari'ah as the ultimate and irrefutable law of Allah for him to think of reforming it, astaghfirullah.. There is only 1 Islam wherever you maybe..
That first question is asking, "Should Muslims live their lives by man's made Laws or live their lives by ALLAH laws ?"
I mean it's pretty straight forward right? So many words they use to duck and dive
Surah Al Ahzab
What a great video, Jazakallah kheyr brother, this is my third comment because you're taking me through different stages of enjoyment and 'izzah of deen. Mashallah tabarakallah for your work and may Allah bless you and your family akh
Yasir Qadhi really thinks he's any sort of Mujtahid who came here to "reform" Islām💀
lol 😂
He's a scholar who academically studied islam he can put his opinion out there. Why Muslims need to overthink too much?
@@DhikrDose putting opinion, and calling yourself a MUJTAHID is same thing?
What is mujtahid?
@@noneofyourbusiness-hg7mk A western Scholar for dollar whose opinions are openly against classical Islāmic Aqeedah, are must to be exposed publically, it's been the tradition of Ummah since the time of Sahaba, otherwise Deen wouldn't stay purified if there was no open criticism of scholarship based on Objective Criteria of Judgement which the likes of Yasir, Omer Sulaiman, & other west-backed "scholars" propogate.
This was excellent! I have learned a lot of you. may Allah reward you and keep you in the straight path brother Daniel.
Waste of 116 minutes who watched the full debate. Brother Daniel explained more Islamic side in 20 minutes than Yasir qadhi in full debate.
How could this be called a debate though ?! .. both Qadi and Mustafa were complementing each other on almost every thing .. dishonest title which goes perfectly with the dishonest nature of both participants.
it was very difficult to differentiate between YQ and kaafir Aykol. was like to liberals debate if we should have soft liberalism or hard liberalism
Love this content brother, may Allah reward you and put barakah in your content
The verse that comes to my mind Whenever Qadhi speaks about change..
When it is said to them, “Do not spread disorder on the earth”, they say, “We are but reformers.”
Subhanallah
4:24 it’s literally at a center for “abrahamic heritage” this has a certain country’s fingerprints all over it
💯
Daniel your a beast Mashallah may Allah protect you and preserve you
I really love this format. I think I speak for all of us, when I say that we needed this type of content.
I just reached 1:02:11 and had to pause to make this comment:
He says the US attacking Al-Qaeda (by invading Afghanistan) is "debatable" whether it was right or wrong. If we want to look at it from Purely international law then it's not debatable at all. If a country experiences a terrorist attack, they cannot simply start bombing another country to get ahold of the suspected terrorist. They will have to provide sufficient evidence. The US refused an investigation into 9/11. They simply told us what happened. They refused to provide any evidence to Afghanistan that a group is responsible for the attack.
This guy is a Turkish. He should know that in 2016 there was a coup attempt by Gulen, a terrorist organization. Their leader was residing in the US. If the US was a weak country would it be " debatable" for turkey to invade it ?
Great show, watching from North Carolina, United States keep up the dawah for the ummah.
Great show jazak allah khair, commenting to help out
Why did Quraysh become extremely violent against prophet Muhammad pbuh and the Muslims? It had nothing to do with the 5 prayers, or fasting, or zakat. They didnt even care if someone believed in one God or even the idols. The prophet pbuh believed in one God, before revelation came to him. He used to go to mount Hira and worship Allah before he got revelation, and yet Quraysh loved him and had no problem with him doing any of that. When did they start having a problem with the prophet pbuh? It was after Allah revealed, "You, wrapped in your clothes. Arise and WARN ALL". (Al Muddathir 1-2).
Quraysh was afraid that this message would bring on social, economic, and political change. A change that is not welcome if you were already at the top. They wanted to keep the status quo. Islam has to do with EVERY aspect of your life, and that includes politics. Like Quraysh, the secular world dont actually care if you pray 5 times or even 50 times a day in your home. But they are afraid of the change that Islam brings to everyone's life. They are afraid of it mainly because it goes against their desires.
They don't care if Islam goes against their desires, they care when Islam doesn't allow a minority to take advantages of the majority, filling their pockets and impoverishing the masses.
@@ALIBolduk I agree. When I used the word "desire", I did also mean greed since it is also a desire.
who gave Muhammad the right to dictate to the Qureish on their land?
@@marcusj9947 God.
@@mah5298 So can the hindus kick Muslims out of their land if their God says so?
The algorithms is not promoting the content. Pls like and share as always to increase coverage.
Can't believe this .. this is embarrassing, thanks for your great work and for opening my eyes and the ummah.. jazakhallah khairan brother
This “Debate” seems to me like some Saudi solution for persuasion. In other words, a PsyOp. They brought 2 reformers to “Debate” each other, but it simply is all about yielding the floor to Qadhi so as to make the Viewers think that his Liberal Position of Reform is Indisputable.
Daniel is doing a great job!!! These secularized people would easily deceive ordinary muslims through their apparent eloquence!
@@posintabook597 Take your meds man 😂
Daniel's voice acting is seriously underrated
I freaking LOVE ❤️ your commentary. It’s sooooo wholesome and doesn’t miss little things others constantly miss
I really love these series of yours jazakallah khairan brother
Yasir Qadhi is people pleaser, changes the fatwas according to his desire... May Allah swt give us true guidance and allow us to follow each every sunnah of our beloved Prohpet muhammad (saw)
39:57 " why because they are wrong" this made me laugh so much . I really enjoy the Haqiqat show , thank you brother, I'm learning a Lot from you
Since Islam get detached from state we felt in this ditch where we are here
Notice, when YQ addressing muslims he talks from Qur’an, Sunnah, passionate islamic speeches, but as soon as he is on secular platforms, he goes along with them.
Thats a method of the sunnah somewhat
Talk using their language
@@ryojs4286Bruh WHAT💀
00:19 Debate between Yasir Qadhi and Mustafa Akyol
03:02 Government and religion relationship in Islam
07:08 Yasir Qadhi uses vague responses to appeal to liberal values
09:03 Debate highlights differing perspectives on religion and politics
12:50 Debate on the separation of religion and government
14:47 Debate on the separation of government and religion
18:21 Advocating for religious freedom and universal values
20:10 Discussion on the impact of European ideas on Turkey's legal system
23:43 Imposed morality through coercion leads to hypocrisy and resentment
25:28 Balancing freedom and morality in different cultures
29:03 Critique of Western liberalism's imposition and legacy of dominance
30:58 Respecting local autonomy and organic change
34:45 Liberalism's view of religious freedom is not applied in reality
36:22 Yasir Qadhi debunks the claim of contesting religious freedom
39:52 Muslims should not assume all religions are correct.
41:45 Restriction of false religions and practices in Sharia
45:05 The importance of religious freedom and respecting individual choices.
46:47 Discussion on the impact of Western media on Muslim communities
49:51 Yasir Qadhi opposes endorsing the law of blasphemy in Islamic societies.
51:28 Local Pakistanis should decide how to address blasphemy laws.
54:43 Respect and abide by the law of the land, with room for criticism and change.
56:24 Freedom to worship and personal life should not harm others, an Islamic and Universal Freedom.
59:51 A problematization of the assumption that freedom and democracy are good for all
1:01:24 Discussing complexities of freedom and democracy
1:04:46 Debate on religious freedom and coercion
1:06:47 Debate on freedom in Muslim societies
1:10:21 Discussion on societal norms and decency levels
1:11:59 Women's freedom leading to nudity in public
1:15:14 Application of Sharia in a nation state is not about copying every law verbatim.
1:17:04 Yasir Qadhi's position on the nation state and Sharia limitations.
1:20:36 Islam does not impose requirements on people.
1:22:24 Debate on ethical and moral issues
1:26:04 Criticism of Yasir Qadhi's responses on sensitive religious topics
1:28:02 Religion's role in shaping natural values
1:31:05 Debating the necessity and feasibility of a caliphate in a secular society
1:33:02 Advocating for a modern nation state absorbing Islamic values
1:36:40 Debate on Islamic nation establishment
1:38:25 Discussion on the concept of caliphate in Islam
1:41:49 Bible's preservation questioned, Quran's clarity highlighted
1:43:31 Exploring a new version of a caliphate
1:46:48 Government's role in making sins legal or illegal
1:48:40 Discussion on the balance between personal piety and public order regarding alcohol consumption.
1:51:50 Yasir Qadhi discusses approach to alcohol ban
1:53:51 Calling out prominent figures for inexcusable mistakes
1:57:31 Alcohol consumption in Turkish society and societal tensions around religious practices
1:59:14 Social enforcement of Islamic values in traditional societies
2:02:56 Both cautious about coercive theological state, differing on level of religious values in politics
2:04:43 Debate on enforcing Quran laws and punishment
2:08:45 Encouraging Islamic morality in governance
2:10:30 Debate limitations on liberal ISM and Islamic law enforcement
2:14:17 Islam advocates for certain freedoms, not absolute freedom
2:16:15 Debate on religious freedom and its impact on society
2:20:23 Yasir Qadhi discusses feminism
JeezakAllah khairan akhi.
Excellent breakdown. Thank you
Yasir Qadi being spinless the entire "debate" is just so typical at this point. I am surprised he still has any Muslims who are subscribed to him and take him seriously.
Just now getting the notification for the video thanks for all the work you do for the ummah brother Daniel !!
2:11:33 there was no public demand for Islam when the Prophet peace be upon him started preaching nor when Essa, nor Nooh nor Lut nor Hud, nor Salah , nor Ibrahim alahim-es-salam started preaching. So we know with whom Akyol would have stood in those times.
Well done brother Daniel..May Allah guide them ameen
How I was not aware of the new episode
No notifications no nothing
The laws against blasphemy aren't the problem, but maybe the implementation of the Pakistani state is. You can't just accuse someone of blasphemy, without any proof and witnesses in shari'a law. If Pakistan does so, it's wrong. Does that mean, that the whole law itself is wrong? It's God's law!
You cant take pakisthan ,it doesnt have shariah law atleast a bit
I love you Daniel for the sake of Allah (Swt). MaShaAllah! Jazaka’Allahu Ahsanal Jaza!
You are a gift for Muslim ummah specially for western…
Keep up the great work!
You know for a fact that after the so called “Debate” they both hugged it out and were happy about the good and “conductive” Debate they had 😊
Jazakallah kheiran brother Daniel
May Allah guide us to the right path
That doesn't make any sense, shouldnt YQ be debating a non reformist traditional MUSLIM......oh wait I get it, they're debating what rout a reformist should take
I’ve just diagnosed Yasir Qazi. He is infected with colonial inferiority complex that can be found in some south Asians…
Brown sahib
I don't really think this is true, tbh. Ayakol is more in line with what you're saying.
I think he sees that the US government views the idea that Islam is one law which is superior to secular laws and should be implemented worldwide to benefit people at the expense of the current rulers as a huge threat and he doesn't want the gov't to go harder on Muslims so he portrays this double mask version of Islam.
But I'm just guessing
Sad but true
Ghora complex.
Thanks for the "laugh out loud" moments. 😂
Excellent video.
Jazak Allahu khayran
Barakallahu feekum
Alhamdulillahi rabbi al'alameen
Yasir "Mr. My personal ijtihaad" Qadhi tries to play all sides. When he speaks, it actually reminds me of a verse I read in the New Testament before my conversion to Islam. It's a quote by Paul, the true founder of Christianity, where he says " I have become all things to all men". Before any Yasir Q. fanboys get into a hissy, I am not making takfir of him, I'm just commenting on the similarity of the mindset between the two. YQ flip flops way too much to be trusted. If I'm not mistaken, I believe years ago he was more inclined towards the pseudo-salafi/wahhaabi cult, which wouldn't be surprising, in that many who originally have those leanings, often eventually go to the other extreme.
I didnt even see the notification
Yasir Qadi is such a disappointment. 😔 Ty for exposing his reformer attitude.
JAK Daniel for doing this. It is important to shed light on these custom made self-claiming scholars.
I've never listened to Yasir qadi before .Whenever I come across his videos I would skip him. He talks differently to most Islamic scholars. He doesn't make sense
Then my brother trust me you are missing a lot. Despite Daniel's personal opinion of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi he is indeed a legit scholar with vast knowledge of Islam. Go listen to the long lectures of his and compare his opinions with classical scholars of the past and you would find that his views are rooted from them. Daniel, I don't doubt his intentions but I do doubt his level of in-depth knowledge.
I do think Qadhi is wrong about this topic, but many of his series and speeches, especially when they deal with history, are well researched and worth watching. He may not be right about everything, but he does have some good scholarship also
Looks like YQ paid some SA bots to call him a "great scalla" in the comments. Disgraceful
Love the Haqiqat show. Also brilliant name. Also ur hilarious with ur sarcastic humour, making me LOL many times.
Bro when he said “because they can’t compute the contradiction” I died 😂😂😂😂😂
I always wanted Daniel to review debates, this should be fun.
Jazak Allah kheir brother Daniel for exposing these cowards they shoyld male dua to Allah subhana for courage with imman yakkin specialy for a scholar may Allah subhana guide us all ameen ya rahima rabbi Allah.
الحمد لله على نعمة الاسلام
Daniel jazakala khayr bro the good work that you doing for islam, this kind ppl they exsisted always
The problem is of psychology not ilm.....
He lives in inferior state of psychology...
Where one is afraid to tell what they really believe...whats fundamentally true in their beliefs....
Because they might be judged....
Bros...
We must be okay being judged...
Islam is superior...
There is a man made system vs system of Allah....
Ofcourse the system of Allah is perfect and superior...
Lets just say it un apologetically
The Haqiqat Show is really beneficial. JazakAllahu khairan, brother Daniel
The whole debate sounded like 2 non-Muslims advocating for a secular govt
Disgraceful
Daniel, please also discuss it in light of the RAND report
Which RAND report? Can you tell?
Brother Daniel, you are a treasure maşallah
If he claims that the Quraa'n is not preserved he is then a disbeliever.
If he believes that Islams ,values, laws or way which Allah has revealed is equal to anything else or there is a better value law etc., he is then a disbeliever.
Please keep going, this is a great breakdown and please keep exposing these munafiq and "reformists"
yasir has lost the plot
He never had it lol
He's figuring it out
@abyrahman6610 He did. He was amazing when he was living in saudi. Unfortunately he deviated when he came to America
Sad but true
He is extremely dishonest. A little weasel.
Coherent and necessary criticism !
The debate or to be more accurate the dialogue itself was a very nice one and as you can see, the conversation was very civilised between both parties. The only issue is that the Islamic perspective was completely missing.
As a muslim living in the west my whole life, sheikh Qadhi was one of the best sheikhs to help my a lot closer to my deen and Allah. Now I see what brother Daniel is trying to say BUT I’m sure that Qadhi, Nouman Ali Khan and others approach helped thousands if not millions of Muslim in the west back/closer to Islam. They are doing a lot of good work available with a single click. Tbh growing up in Europe I am sure that a stricter approach would not have helped me personally. Therefore they are much needed for a certain group of young Muslims.
I am sure that sheikh Qadhi has a lot of beneficial knowledge put out there for every Muslim, pick and choose, but for example the more than 300 hours of seerah of sahaba or even more of seerah of prophet Muhammad ﷺ. I also appreciate brother Daniel’s work and benefit from it, but think he’s to hard on sheikh
I understand your position brother but Islam is not a tolerant religion especially in terms of “reform” when it comes to the Deen and Fatwa. May Allah protect us from those that cause confusion, Ameen Ya Rabb
@@Quantum-1157 did you read any thing I wrote? I clearly say that I understand Daniel, which therefore means these things are not good, otherwise I wouldn’t accept it from Daniel. However, I’m talking about me, and millions of Muslims were brought back to Islam by YQ and NAK, and that they have tons of useful information easily available for the Muslim youth. Does this not affect you that a Muslim came back because of their help, or that many others also either found Islam or came back?
I don’t need to talk about ulama in any bad way as all Muslims have done wrong before, or are you not human and make mistakes?
Try and understand what I mean instead of attacking, look at the previous comment who said he’s opinion, but clearly with some Islamic tarbya. Learn how to express yourself, especially with other Muslims who haven’t wronged you in any way.
@@El-Mariachi-Classicsdo you also not think they have the opposite effect, misguide millions due to NAK n Qadhi beliefs, like beliefs about holes in Quran narratives of both men, also no believing in hadiis that were strong, a munafiq can write many books on truth n facts, but don’t you think it crosses the line when they say Allahs word is wrong, the Quran is wrong.
@@El-Mariachi-Classicswhen can you throw away the baby with the bath water, when they say the Quran and strong hadiis are wrong. Throw those MFS away period. Please stop making excuses for them. If you don’t agree with the basics of Islam then what are you really preaching if not misguidance. I am glad you feel he helped you but your lack of understanding their grave error is very concerning.
@@shugridualle5566 calling them mfs, is a huge sin.. says a lot about you who pretend to be strict Muslim. May Allah guide and forgive you. Beware of your tongue
I like this new show format.
Should Islam be the law?
Yaseer: Colonialism, theory of nation states, one rule all scenarios, pros and cons of all systems+$!"!+##($($!$;:3-$-";!#(#7$+7"!!$.....
Muslim: Yes.
I am not finished watching but so far Danielle u r doing g a great job!
According to Mustafa Akyol:
Imposing religious rules = bad
Imposing secular laws = good
Yasir Qadhi barely made a dent in this "debate" - it was practically 2 people agreeing with eachother 95% of the time, with their framework being more or less the same.
May Allah guide them and us.
Jazak'Allah khair for your work.
I enjoyed this episode. Love your humor.
Jazaakh Allaah for this brother Daniel..u really exposed YQ and his reformist views that has nothing to do with islam
I love how Daniel catches the contradiction of Yasir's American approach to social change vs his advice to Muftis in Pakistan (whose hands are really tied, Yasir's or the Mufti's? Lol)
I have one question:
In the absence of a Khalifa, every single Muslim majority country has "organically" (in accord with both western culture and their culture) pursued what they thInk is their balance of religion and state,; and thats whats to be expected in rhe absence of a Khalifa.
When we had Caliphates in the past they were also all different from one another depending on what form of popular Aqeeda they adopted at the time (or is there a belief that every form of Aqeeda that every Sultan mandated was always the aqeeda of ahl el sunnah wal Jamaah?)
I don't like yasir qahdi . After the few times he has almost brought fitna with the previous complaints of his in terms of preservation of the Quran. And yajuj and majuj and alluding to modernize the interpretations of the Quran. He has caused more issues than help to Islam imo. Allah wallum. I just think he's a bit of a hypocrite. Caters to where his bread is buttered.
As soon as I started listening to the interview I turned it off right away when I heard Yasir Qadi talking about there is no law that fits every part of the world. He is clearly wrong. We have that law and that is Allah’s law