After receiving an Overwhelming Number of requests seeking insights into our Content Creation process, spanning from Stunning Visuals to Dynamic Animations, we present to you the pinnacle of Generating AI Powered Content. For more information visit: astragallery.com (Link in Channel Description)
@@aaad3552 Humanity was an idea developed in the centres of civilization like Egypt, Greece, Rome, India, China, etc. Do you think someone living in the Sahara or the Arabian desert would survive long if he cared for humanity?
@@PROOB-xq2rq That's just wrong. Most Chinese kings toture people acholic and abusive. Mate with many wifes treat them like slave. By toture I don't mean prisoners but everyone who pisses him off or critise him or just for fun like daily and so much corruptions killing each other for positions like thinking life in center of civilization has humanity is just narrow-minded. Idea of humanity exist everywhere as long as good/kind people exist just isn't advertise like more developed country. And why do you think human developed the idea of humanity? And why should people treat a person who sacrifice humanity for pride other then an animal. And you don't need to be a warlord to survive 😂 that's just dumb. Don't play victim card mate.
@@tammychapman1521 my client has been advised not to give any public statements due to this being an ongoing case but we can absolutely assure you and the rest of the general public that “he did not have any relations to those other kitties” nothing to see here people keep it moving. Yours truly the Bill Clintons defense attorney of law.
don't worry the outer layer of fur on cats tails are actually semi-fire proff. Here is an example, probably the cats survived and are ancestors of your kitty. th-cam.com/users/shortsLIintT3OEg4
Humans are no different than animals, biology is undefeated. Reality is unfair, has winners and losers, some eat some starve, some breed some don’t, some die at birth some live to 90. Etc once the curtain of abundance and safety leave the modern world we go back to biology 💯
History gives us abundant examples of the opposite. It's been the great geniuses who've changed the world and not the ruthless rulers like Genghis Khan, although this one was quite a play.
@@keizan5132Chinggis Khaan literally changed the world by opening up trade between the east and west. Without him you either wouldve never ate rice or watched netflix.
There were also good example of Great men 1) Ram 2) Jesus 3) 10 gurus of Sikhs 4) Chandragupta Maurya 5) Abraham Lincon and other freedom fighters of USA and other different countries History is filled with names of thousand of such morale people but sadly 95% people were&are mostly bad and immoral
@@JustFingAwesome uhm, it's called history. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Phidias, Seneca, Newton, Einstein, Tesla, Cervantes, Shakespear, Montesquieu, Rousseau... I could go on forever. Genghis Khan or Charlemagne couldn't ever create anything. They just killed and conquered what existed, none of them could change the world not even in a tenth of the proportion of an actual great mind. Great minds change the world, not great killers and robbers, no matter how much they conquer, the world as a whole is still in the same point of progress until an actual great mind comes and tweaks it. So no, an actually great man isn't rarely a good man. Quite the opposite.
@@TindahanPampalipasOras no not really he just marry of them to some lord and make the lord fight for him in the front line and killing them so he’s daughter can rule he’s territory
@@JayTX.yea but not everyone can think like that. May warlords just lose or die because they aren't smart enough to come up with this type of tactic. Wanting to be this clever isn't the same as being this clever
I mean even in WW2 dogs were used as suicide bombs. If you have to kill or die then some animals life is of very little value. I still have family members alive that had to eat horses and dogs in a war zone to avoid starvation.
@@Brotried97 Besieging a city was an astronomical feat, costing a lot too. Horses are not that pricey compared to a siege. Failed sieges generally tipped the scale of war, one way or another.
Evil or not it won him his victory at the end of the day as long as you win a battle that's all that matters when you fight war you fight to win regardless of cost or suffering.
Nope. Mongol familial loyalty was very strong. These werent some primitive savages with no feelings, they were just way more cruel than the average man to their enemies. Edit : It seems people have no sense of history and just wanna label Mongols as defacto demons because it do be like that. Read some primary sources, OPs comment is complete bull.
@@RoyOnMoveit's normal at the time, Chinese already used this tactics hundreds years before Genghis khan, they usually send princess to married one of strong khan so they can infighting and not invade china
It wasn’t just cats-he also released thousands of sparrows with pitch painted on their backs and legs and set on fire. The sparrows, which were from the city’s roosts, fled home to the palace and the houses of the nobility, into nests padded with straw.
Olga of Kiev used a similar tactic in a siege where she took the birds of the city and tied burning cloth to their legs before letting them fly back, resulting in a hellish rain of fire that roasted the entire city. This tactic wasn’t necessarily uncommon, though it is the first time I’ve heard Genghis Khan use it.
They say Ghengis loved Cats. I don't think people read the fine print in why he loved cats. Edit: This post denotes sarcasm in the difference of opinions of historians and scholars who claim Ghengis loved cats and why he possibly loved them, was it for the devastation they caused in battle or the touchy feelies most animal lovers have. Or the flip side he didn't love them because he weaponized them. If you don't get it as sarcasm I am sorry. Some people do not understand sarcasm. I apologize to those of you who emulate the fictional Sheldon Cooper's character from TBBT and need a sign. So just scroll on.
@@batjardalmc1166 actually there are people actual historians who say he loved cats. You think they would see what he did in this battle and reconsider he didn't love cats except as weapons. That's what I mean about fine print. When people completely skip this battle.
@@mentaritravel1004they need to throw a billion dollars on this movie. The amount of wars and violence in this man's life could easily give a trilogy's worth of material.
@erenkara-tl8uydo you think alexander is great? Cause he was a murderer too Killed millions and you think one is great and one is just a murderer by his tactics?
@@Gaurav_Mukherjee bruh, why u guys indian hate muslim so much, i understand u hate indian muslim, but historically, most muslim war against non muslim are way more humane than genghis khan war... i bet u never go outside indian border ur whole life
@@davijchaudhry8924 he did a lot of good as much as bad The state of the Mongols was way more hierarchical after he at least made it more about being less about we're born and more about how good you are at the job
@@guessnot8015 you know what a war is? Do you even know his history for that matter 😂 You think he's a better ruler then the king? U think he's doing it out of kindness or any moral reasons? Dude being weak isn't an admirable trait and cruelty and cheating on top of that lol. Dude just burned houses innocent ppl put effort into it just cause he's incapable of defeating them.
@@ashannoweria2855 Olga of Kiev predates Genghis by a few hundred years. She was mostly alive in the 9th century. Genghis was alive in the 11th and 12th centuries.
@@yusufalqubaisi7481enghis Khan was not a Muslim lmao The title ‘Khagan’ means ‘supreme leader’ in Mongolian. The word ‘Khagan’ was synonymous to ‘Khan’. Genghis Khan was not a Muslim He was a Tengrist ruler
Smart because cats knew how and where to head back to since that was their original home. He couldn’t have done this as effective if he brought the cats from elsewhere
@@vdhiekl1812burn cats to trick the trusting ruler what a smartass I bet some philosophers aren't even smart as him. I am sure the soldiers he sacrificed to win HIS wars are thanking him for it.
@@diddigaming because, the cats would eventually return to their homeplace or masters if they were hurt or released. If genghis khan had brought the cats, there was a chance the cats would return to the army or scatter elsewhere causing the plan to backfire...
Ghengis Kahn was probably familiar with the ancient story of Samson. Samson took down a Philistine enemy by using foxes in a similar manner. He set their tails on fire and set them loose in the city of the Philistines. He later conquered 30,000 by himself.
@@Noah-jk8goWell, I've seen where if you ask an apologist about this, that they'll find some way to explain it away or not make it sound as bad as it looks.
@@Noah-jk8go Glad I could be of assistance. I'm very familiar with the Bible and I'm happy to post anything I know, especially if someone asks me to do so.
It's amazing what kind of fairy tales you can get idiots to believe. The people of Moses had an entire army and GOD HIMSELF directly behind them and they were still too terrified to fight the Filistines. And here you are telling a mythical story about one man who defeated 30,000 warriors with the jawbone of a donkey. You have to be a donkey to believe that 😂🤣😂🤣
Gengis was extremely smart and effective warrior. He knew the cats could easily climb walls, barricades etc. Lighting their tails with fire is the perfect op
There would always be small holes, nooks and crannies. Probably figured the terrified animals would try return home where they'd formerly felt safe. Genius but exponentially evil.
It seems you are saying that because he built the biggest empire ever, it follows that he is the worst human being in history. Those two things may not be corelated. Read history books and I'm pretty sure there are accounts of more sinister humans. Take a look at Roman emperors, for a start.
I heard that story before. The birds were even more crucial than the cats in that attack. The Mongolians used small pouches filled with some sort of mineral, which functions as a fire accelerant. They tied them to the birds and then set them on fire. When they reached the buildings of the city and the minerals caught fire, roofs were going up in flames in mere seconds. With the cats setting up houses from the bottom, the city was going up in flames very quickly. Quite terrifying and disturbing, but highly effective
This was a scene in the Netflix show Marco Polo as a memory of Kubla Khan Genghis's grandson and aire, damn shame they quit making it after the second season it was a great show
@@C12341what you fail to realize is, those people that got killed their stupid and large ego rulera thought they could defend themselves agains our khan. The cities and kingdoms that submit didnt have their cultures changed, no religon imposed, they flourished, had protection from bandits, if they were in a famine or something they would just ask and get like food and what not. All that they were asked in return was their skilled craftsmen to make nee weapons and idea’s and from that idea’s spread from china to eastern europe. Obv times were different back then but genghis was th most merciless yet understanding, we werent like the christians who forced people into Christianity or kingdoms that wiped out other cultures because they thought their culture was better and the others barbaric
@@C12341he united his country and conquered half of the world aaand he was extremely smart thats why hes praised. And if you still have a sympathy for that 40 million people good for you
@@ginnoji. lol, China got beaten because they were weak at the time, Mongols was just the one used Sun Tzu strategies better at the time. What happened when Mongols invaded Vietnam 3 times in 1258, 1282, 1287. They got beaten up by a small country using Sun Tzu’s strategies tho. By that being said, Mongols just used Sun Tzu strategies better than other during their time.
And today Mongolia is a nation of less than 3 million people with the overwhelming majority living in tents heated by dried dung. It's the most wretched place on Earth. The irony is that once you go rock bottom to win at any cost, your descendants will pay the price. And that's exactly what happened. The conquered nations struck back ruthlessly and with an efficiency that would made the Mongols blush. They had set the precedent.
No they didn't struck back dude. Read the history lol. They retreated. His decendants when to conquer even more land in asia and middle eastern reigons. Read the god damn history lol
People cared plenty for their animals back then, even cats. Ancient Egyptians revered cats so much that they would mummify them when they died, a custom most often reserved for nobility. But cruel people have been around since before the dawn of civilization, and they have been as cruel then as they are now.
@@El9endilo I pet strays all the time. They deserve love they control the pest population. Without them life would be harder for us. Just wash your hands after and nothing but will happen.
I can't find anything about Genghis khan doing that. I am starting to think chatGPT ripped off Olga's story and retold it with different decorations and props
@@Kisamon you’d stave the city and some would die off from unsanitary living and spread of disease. That way he would even save his army from any depletion.
Well you can't conquer half the world with good intentions and "honorable" combat. There is a price to pay and that is losing almost any sense of morality and empathy.
There's a great strategist and economist of India named Chalukya who used similar tactic. He himself wasn't a king but the king he assessed become one of the greatest emperor of ancient India.
Pacta sunt servanda. While it's easy to win fights by breaking the rules/your word, it becomes increasingly difficult to secure peace and stabilty if everyone expects you to.
Some people are strong,some are clever, some are crazy (reckless), some are greedy and some are cruel. Genghis Khan was somehow everything at once ,rarest of the rare DNA!!!
@@FleshBrain He controlled 0% of South and North America, 0% of Africa, Japan, and all South Pacific, India, and most of Europe except Russia and Ukraine were not controlled by him. It was less than 20%
He did a lot of damage, though. He destroyed existing power structures, leading to all kinds of civil unrest and resets after he died. The Golden Age of Islam, when the Middle East was an economic, scientific, and mathematical powerhouse was broken and replaced with the extremism we see today in many countries. Europeans added to that in the 20th century.
More like poor people. Edit: The amount of people believing 1. I must have a dog and 2. since I supposedly have a dog I therefore hate cats is truly astonishing.
Scared animals run back home. The man was an evil genius to ransack a fortified city with just that little bit of insight. Cats fit through very small gaps in the fortifications that humans cannot and they surely used them since cats like to roam so they must have streamed in all at once.
I think that must have been before he gotten his hands on siege weapons. Ghengis is known for taking enemy weapons and use them for his own strategy. If an enemy he conquered had stuff he did not, they would incorporate it into the next battles. Evolve every fight to be better so to say
@@NikoBellaKhouf2even the Catholic church is going straight to hellfire bruh, all of European monarchs were just like him, he just succeeded more than them
The Mongols were a nomadic group so cities don't matter, the usually left the cites that didn't get completely obliterated were left to with one of his daughter.
After receiving an Overwhelming Number of requests seeking insights into our Content Creation process, spanning from Stunning Visuals to Dynamic Animations, we present to you the pinnacle of Generating AI Powered Content.
For more information visit: astragallery.com (Link in Channel Description)
BULLSHIT!
Clever and cruel at the same time. As expected from Genghis Khan, didn't give sh*t about morality.
Wouldn't really care about morality when you have to sonehow survive your whole life.
@@PROOB-xq2rq literally every animals did that 😂 maby if the ruler see him as one this won't be happening
@@aaad3552 Humanity was an idea developed in the centres of civilization like Egypt, Greece, Rome, India, China, etc. Do you think someone living in the Sahara or the Arabian desert would survive long if he cared for humanity?
Same reason why we nuked Japan
@@PROOB-xq2rq That's just wrong. Most Chinese kings toture people acholic and abusive. Mate with many wifes treat them like slave. By toture I don't mean prisoners but everyone who pisses him off or critise him or just for fun like daily and so much corruptions killing each other for positions like thinking life in center of civilization has humanity is just narrow-minded. Idea of humanity exist everywhere as long as good/kind people exist just isn't advertise like more developed country.
And why do you think human developed the idea of humanity?
And why should people treat a person who sacrifice humanity for pride other then an animal.
And you don't need to be a warlord to survive 😂 that's just dumb.
Don't play victim card mate.
Gengis Khan was extremely smart but also incredibly ruthless.
He was your great grandfather though
And dishonourable as well.
Psychopaths usually are
@deckhead33 exactly unfortunately there a few other guys like him that comes in my mind.
Perfect combo
Even the god damned cats weren't safe when Genghis Khan shows up he's using them as improvised siege weapons.
Lol
And for dinner too
@@morningstar2045ಠ_ಠ
But why not use catapult/trebuchet to cause a fire?
@@someguy2744because memes
"No cats were harmed during this event" - Sun Tzu
If only that were true...
Lmfao
@@log2nz don’t ask don’t tell lol
I have to ask, HOW is it even possible for the cats NOT to have been harmed?
@@tammychapman1521 my client has been advised not to give any public statements due to this being an ongoing case but we can absolutely assure you and the rest of the general public that “he did not have any relations to those other kitties” nothing to see here people keep it moving. Yours truly the Bill Clintons defense attorney of law.
As a cat lover, that hurts but boy his ruthless tactics were also genius
He also r*ped many women….is that genius?
Just like what samson did with the foxes
don't worry the outer layer of fur on cats tails are actually semi-fire proff. Here is an example, probably the cats survived and are ancestors of your kitty.
th-cam.com/users/shortsLIintT3OEg4
Genius?? 😮🙄🙄
It’s treachery there’s nothing genius about it.
- Open gates, now!
- No!
- We got cats
- Oh, ok
That is funny xD
Me thinking that they would be dressed in armor and swords
@@Baguetteman357The Ocelot squadron is ready. 👉 👉
@@bovineavenger734 do we have the horses ready we gonna raid the polish
This comment deserves WAY more likes. 😂
"Never believe what your enemy says.
Never take what he offers you."
Art of War
Nah mate not at all
@@mr.google7364your dommed
@@mr.google7364the trojan horse
Funny enough this might be the first real quote from sun tzu i have seen on the Internet
This is perfidy if you pull a stunt like this you can never negotiate again and you will never be taken prisoner no ransom will be demanded
"Bring out the secret weapon... UNLEASH THE KITTIES!!!"
Underrated comment. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I shouldn't laugh at this 😂. Those poor fur babies 😭
Genghis khan conquering the lands of his son in law:
" Bring the Secret weapons, Unleash the T-"
Austin Powers Villian assist voice:
🗣RELEASE THE KITTENS!!!!!!!!
This is fake. Valohia never existed. Look on Google and Wikipedia. You won't find Valohia.
I mean, there had to be a reason for him being able to conquer half of the world.
Bro was the literal definition of thinking outside the box
Outside the litter box 🤪
@@tombowers6713badm tusss
I'm related to him. It's pretty cool to think that one of the strongest rulers in the world is in my bloodline
@sgkhk2397 0.5% of the world carries his Y chromosome. Did a DNA test a while back, and he is a relative of mine.
Its fake
Although he was cruel and evil you can't deny he was one of the most brilliant strategists and generals ever
He was smart but ruthless
He was horrible and cruel.
@@sonofizzybut you cant deby he was smart af
@@zoech99 I didn't even try, because he was smart - ruthless and smart. One has to be most careful in deals with such as him.
Humans are no different than animals, biology is undefeated. Reality is unfair, has winners and losers, some eat some starve, some breed some don’t, some die at birth some live to 90. Etc once the curtain of abundance and safety leave the modern world we go back to biology 💯
He’s most certainly NOT on PETA’s Christmas List
PETA would absolutely love Genghis Khan for this.
he will absolutely be on PETA's Christmas list 😎
Genghis Khan:I killed 1000 cats
PETA:just a 1000?how cute.
PETA: Write that down. write that down!!
Lets all send them postcards this cristmas with his picture on the front and this story on the inside. 🐈 🔥 🔥 🔥
A great man is rarely a good man
History gives us abundant examples of the opposite. It's been the great geniuses who've changed the world and not the ruthless rulers like Genghis Khan, although this one was quite a play.
@@keizan5132Chinggis Khaan literally changed the world by opening up trade between the east and west. Without him you either wouldve never ate rice or watched netflix.
There were also good example of Great men
1) Ram 2) Jesus 3) 10 gurus of Sikhs 4) Chandragupta Maurya 5) Abraham Lincon and other freedom fighters of USA and other different countries
History is filled with names of thousand of such morale people but sadly 95% people were&are mostly bad and immoral
@@keizan5132what kind of fairy tale history book have you been reading?
@@JustFingAwesome uhm, it's called history. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Phidias, Seneca, Newton, Einstein, Tesla, Cervantes, Shakespear, Montesquieu, Rousseau... I could go on forever. Genghis Khan or Charlemagne couldn't ever create anything. They just killed and conquered what existed, none of them could change the world not even in a tenth of the proportion of an actual great mind. Great minds change the world, not great killers and robbers, no matter how much they conquer, the world as a whole is still in the same point of progress until an actual great mind comes and tweaks it.
So no, an actually great man isn't rarely a good man. Quite the opposite.
Dude can weaponize everything, from his daughters to animals
Edit: damn this amount of likes for this shitty joke 🤣
Living in the steppes with very limited resources would do that
daughters? now that more than ruthless
@@TindahanPampalipasOras no not really he just marry of them to some lord and make the lord fight for him in the front line and killing them so he’s daughter can rule he’s territory
Lmao i also saw that short. Sgy are kengis khan shorts on my Feed??? Lmao
Bro's a certified 2b2t player 💀
I swear, this man came up with the most bizarre ways to win his battles
If you ain't first you're last
@@JayTX. If you ain't first, you're driven before him, hearing the lamentations of your women
@@JayTX. He really did Shake & Bake them.
@@JayTX.this was a test from god now he died any way by winnig battle or loosing .. i will burn like all those cats
@@JayTX.yea but not everyone can think like that. May warlords just lose or die because they aren't smart enough to come up with this type of tactic. Wanting to be this clever isn't the same as being this clever
Not just cats. He did it with horses, and birds that nested in the roofs of homes. It’s actually not an uncommon tactic.
@@Brotried97The mongols have better horse breed
@@Brotried97 When they sound like literally demons. The psychological effect that they have in a battle is worth it
I mean even in WW2 dogs were used as suicide bombs. If you have to kill or die then some animals life is of very little value. I still have family members alive that had to eat horses and dogs in a war zone to avoid starvation.
@@Brotried97 Besieging a city was an astronomical feat, costing a lot too. Horses are not that pricey compared to a siege.
Failed sieges generally tipped the scale of war, one way or another.
Black Kite and Brown Falcon:
Yeah, we know .....
*while flying and carrying a burning twig*
Anyone who tortures thousands of animals to win access to a city is cunning, diabolically clever but at the same time purely evil.
He raped tens of thousands of women. I’m sure he didn’t care about a bunch of cats
Agreed. Poor cats.
Evil or not it won him his victory at the end of the day as long as you win a battle that's all that matters when you fight war you fight to win regardless of cost or suffering.
That’s war
Well said. Even now to make money China uses harmful matter like artificial eggs, n plastic rice. A lot of others
Gotta be a psycho/sociopath when conquering entire cities
No shit Sherlock
And to rule one too, see how all these politicians are psychopath
Almost as cruel as the people who have ruined most of the cities in the United States
Funny how when Alexander or Caesar do it is clever but when Genghis Khan does it he’s a psycho and a sociopath 🤦♂️
Yup. Shits cuhrayzayyy
He's like the villain who would use his son as an arrow shield if that would make him win.
Nope. Mongol familial loyalty was very strong. These werent some primitive savages with no feelings, they were just way more cruel than the average man to their enemies.
Edit : It seems people have no sense of history and just wanna label Mongols as defacto demons because it do be like that. Read some primary sources, OPs comment is complete bull.
Actually he used her daughters as a shield allegorically speaking.
@@kanhaibhatt913 lol Chengis even used his daughters as honey trap.
@@RoyOnMove did he use them as meat shields ? I dont think so
@@RoyOnMoveit's normal at the time, Chinese already used this tactics hundreds years before Genghis khan, they usually send princess to married one of strong khan so they can infighting and not invade china
It's brutal but you can't deny it's brilliance
True
its ("its" is a pronoun like his or her, so no apostrophe!)
Fx bro
@@Christobanistanit's it's not the same as he or she
@@chilledwinter4 his or hers
Lol source: trust my TTS voice bro 😂😂😂😂
It wasn’t just cats-he also released thousands of sparrows with pitch painted on their backs and legs and set on fire. The sparrows, which were from the city’s roosts, fled home to the palace and the houses of the nobility, into nests padded with straw.
Thanks!
Surprised they made it that far and them on fire! 😮
Olga of Kiev used a similar tactic in a siege where she took the birds of the city and tied burning cloth to their legs before letting them fly back, resulting in a hellish rain of fire that roasted the entire city. This tactic wasn’t necessarily uncommon, though it is the first time I’ve heard Genghis Khan use it.
Did he live a peaceful life, what age did he die?
Easily one of the most evil thing
They say Ghengis loved Cats. I don't think people read the fine print in why he loved cats.
Edit: This post denotes sarcasm in the difference of opinions of historians and scholars who claim Ghengis loved cats and why he possibly loved them, was it for the devastation they caused in battle or the touchy feelies most animal lovers have. Or the flip side he didn't love them because he weaponized them. If you don't get it as sarcasm I am sorry. Some people do not understand sarcasm. I apologize to those of you who emulate the fictional Sheldon Cooper's character from TBBT and need a sign. So just scroll on.
Lol
💀
💀
Because he told a lie this isn’t true
@@batjardalmc1166 actually there are people actual historians who say he loved cats. You think they would see what he did in this battle and reconsider he didn't love cats except as weapons.
That's what I mean about fine print. When people completely skip this battle.
Point to be noted : In a war do not expect anything to go according to morals, no matter how pious your enemy is.
War has no rules. Why do you think that DESPITE laws around war... people still commit warcrimes?
😂
It’s perfidy you’re not a man if you do it so no one will treat you like one
Who the fuck said that.
There should be a movie on this man. These stories seem hella interesting.
there are already series of him, quite some time ago.
@erenkara-tl8uy Why are their so many movies on Alexander then. He was a disgusting murderer too.
@@mentaritravel1004they need to throw a billion dollars on this movie. The amount of wars and violence in this man's life could easily give a trilogy's worth of material.
Hitler of the East is what it should be called
@erenkara-tl8uydo you think alexander is great? Cause he was a murderer too
Killed millions and you think one is great and one is just a murderer by his tactics?
Never expect morality from your enemy especially in war.
@@Gaurav_Mukherjee war
@@Gaurav_Mukherjee bruh, why u guys indian hate muslim so much, i understand u hate indian muslim, but historically, most muslim war against non muslim are way more humane than genghis khan war... i bet u never go outside indian border ur whole life
@@Gaurav_MukherjeeGenghis Khan wasn't Muslim and honestly he treated them very well as long as they were allies
Now I'm certain that Genghis Khan is going to hellfire.
@@davijchaudhry8924 he did a lot of good as much as bad
The state of the Mongols was way more hierarchical after he at least made it more about being less about we're born and more about how good you are at the job
Cruel but effective
U mean dishonorable?
And pathetic depending on cats to win a war.
@@aaad3552 mf those were the medieval ages what do you expect
@@aaad3552 thats a war
@@guessnot8015 you know what a war is? Do you even know his history for that matter 😂
You think he's a better ruler then the king? U think he's doing it out of kindness or any moral reasons?
Dude being weak isn't an admirable trait and cruelty and cheating on top of that lol.
Dude just burned houses innocent ppl put effort into it just cause he's incapable of defeating them.
Damn he pulled an Olga of Kiev, but with cats instead of birds.
Olga walked so Genghis could run.
I think chengiz used that statergy first with the birds
@@ashannoweria2855 Olga of Kiev predates Genghis by a few hundred years. She was mostly alive in the 9th century. Genghis was alive in the 11th and 12th centuries.
The things you learn at Sam O Nella university...
These are invented legends.
That’s not cunning, that’s demonic.
This is fake. Valohia never existed. Look on Google and Wikipedia. You won't find Valohia.
Maybe you should search up the meaning of the word "cunning"
I thought demons were cunning
Who needs drone when you have cats
-Art of Khan
Art of Khan😂
Hahaha u r right 😅
Allah heal the worlds...
Have joyful lifes
"Find out the number of enemies in a formation, then reduce that number to zero"
@@life_is_a_myth goodbye sun tzu HAHAHAHHAHA
@@yusufalqubaisi7481enghis Khan was not a Muslim lmao
The title ‘Khagan’ means ‘supreme leader’ in Mongolian. The word ‘Khagan’ was synonymous to ‘Khan’.
Genghis Khan was not a Muslim
He was a Tengrist ruler
Genghis Khan took "Everything is Fair in Love and War" way too seriously.
He must have really loved cats
Smart because cats knew how and where to head back to since that was their original home. He couldn’t have done this as effective if he brought the cats from elsewhere
Moral of the story: it is dangerous to make deals with a cat person
They set the cats on fire to conquere a city
A cat person would NEVER do that. Not for the peoples' sakes, but for the cats' sakes.
😂
Damn straight. We are more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
@@vdhiekl1812burn cats to trick the trusting ruler what a smartass I bet some philosophers aren't even smart as him.
I am sure the soldiers he sacrificed to win HIS wars are thanking him for it.
True moral of the story: make sure cats don't learn firebending
The tail is the cats most sensitive part 😢
This is fake. Valohia never existed. Look on Google and Wikipedia. You won't find Valohia.
CAN YOU STOP YAPPING@@ScottyShaw
Lol I agree these mythological tales seems to turn some of these people into gods
Ghengis Khan: What do we need to win the battle?
Minister: Cats Sir, many cats...
Ghengis Khan: Ask our enemies for cats.
I've read this in Aku/Uncle Iroh's voice
@@diddigamingu dont get it...
@@diddigaming and why do you think he asked *them* to give ?
@@diddigaming because, the cats would eventually return to their homeplace or masters if they were hurt or released.
If genghis khan had brought the cats, there was a chance the cats would return to the army or scatter elsewhere causing the plan to backfire...
@@diddigaming yeah but i added more. Don't you wonder why he didn't brought his own cats ?
Ps: i know he's joking...
So in other words.........Ghengis invented the original CAT-tastrophe.
😂😂😂
Wew😅
Underrated comment. 😂
Damn man😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Ghengis Kahn was probably familiar with the ancient story of Samson. Samson took down a Philistine enemy by using foxes in a similar manner. He set their tails on fire and set them loose in the city of the Philistines. He later conquered 30,000 by himself.
Thank God I found this comment. I was wondering if no one has ever heard of the story with Samson before.
@@Noah-jk8goWell, I've seen where if you ask an apologist about this, that they'll find some way to explain it away or not make it sound as bad as it looks.
@@Noah-jk8go Glad I could be of assistance. I'm very familiar with the Bible and I'm happy to post anything I know, especially if someone asks me to do so.
That never happened
It's amazing what kind of fairy tales you can get idiots to believe. The people of Moses had an entire army and GOD HIMSELF directly behind them and they were still too terrified to fight the Filistines. And here you are telling a mythical story about one man who defeated 30,000 warriors with the jawbone of a donkey. You have to be a donkey to believe that 😂🤣😂🤣
Those who harm cats deserve hell 😡
Gengis was extremely smart and effective warrior. He knew the cats could easily climb walls, barricades etc. Lighting their tails with fire is the perfect op
There would always be small holes, nooks and crannies. Probably figured the terrified animals would try return home where they'd formerly felt safe. Genius but exponentially evil.
"Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake"
- Napoleon
And that comes from Sun Zi
And how does this apply here?
Hate it when people quote others to seem smart themselves
That doesnt…. Uhh no
"Life is about, hot greasy fast speed."
-Eleanor Roosevelt
Psychopath's most famous quotes.
This guy was single handily the worse human being in history this just scratches his cruelty and lack of morality. Absolute sociopath
Must have gotten that from Alexander the Great
It seems you are saying that because he built the biggest empire ever, it follows that he is the worst human being in history. Those two things may not be corelated. Read history books and I'm pretty sure there are accounts of more sinister humans. Take a look at Roman emperors, for a start.
Now he is burning in hell, with his tail his tail on fire,. The almighty God knows , how to burn his tail, LoL, sociopath,
he is awesome
Are you a citizen of valohia? 😂
bro was ruthless af
Winning is easy when you have no soul and feel nothing😂
Dude took "everything is fair in love and war" very seriously.
I heard that story before. The birds were even more crucial than the cats in that attack. The Mongolians used small pouches filled with some sort of mineral, which functions as a fire accelerant. They tied them to the birds and then set them on fire. When they reached the buildings of the city and the minerals caught fire, roofs were going up in flames in mere seconds. With the cats setting up houses from the bottom, the city was going up in flames very quickly. Quite terrifying and disturbing, but highly effective
“What were the birds for?”
“Nothing. I just thought it would be funny.”
🏆
He attached fire to them, too.
@@evilsharkey8954We call that cooking
This was a scene in the Netflix show Marco Polo as a memory of Kubla Khan Genghis's grandson and aire, damn shame they quit making it after the second season it was a great show
A dead man:-So,how did you die?
Dead men from Valohia:-We got overrun by cats.
Bro didn’t even care about the cats, just wanted to destroy a city, pure evil
It wasn't evil he was a conqueror and he conquered
Kill or be killed.
Anything go’s at war !
@@justno.6011braindead? Pure evil
@@michaelhammar2778 whoosh
"Nesting birds and well fed dogs always return to the walls of their master." Ghengis Khan
Genghis: "don't kill my messengers!"
Also Genghis: breaks peace treaty
Fuck the peace treaty... nigga burned 1,000 kitty cats.
Like America
That man was just the devil in human form.
@@C12341well said.
@@C12341Ruthless and extremely smart at the time he was alive. Biggest empire needed ruthless king. Conquer or be conquered.
@@C12341what you fail to realize is, those people that got killed their stupid and large ego rulera thought they could defend themselves agains our khan. The cities and kingdoms that submit didnt have their cultures changed, no religon imposed, they flourished, had protection from bandits, if they were in a famine or something they would just ask and get like food and what not. All that they were asked in return was their skilled craftsmen to make nee weapons and idea’s and from that idea’s spread from china to eastern europe. Obv times were different back then but genghis was th most merciless yet understanding, we werent like the christians who forced people into Christianity or kingdoms that wiped out other cultures because they thought their culture was better and the others barbaric
@@C12341he united his country and conquered half of the world aaand he was extremely smart thats why hes praised. And if you still have a sympathy for that 40 million people good for you
Adolf, Joseph, and Mao: Allow us to introduce ourselves
"A thousand cats have more strength than a hundred thousand men."
-Sun Tzu, probably
*EDIT:* OMG 1.1K likes in two days! Mama I'm famous! 😃😃😃
No it is our mighty lord Chingis khan
@@temuulenamartuvshin1204im sure he used Sun Tzu strategies 🤣
@@Themaster31415Sun Tzu is from China whose got beaten by Mongols multiple times, they built biggest wall in the world still couldn't stop Mongols.
@@ginnoji. lol, China got beaten because they were weak at the time, Mongols was just the one used Sun Tzu strategies better at the time. What happened when Mongols invaded Vietnam 3 times in 1258, 1282, 1287. They got beaten up by a small country using Sun Tzu’s strategies tho. By that being said, Mongols just used Sun Tzu strategies better than other during their time.
@@Themaster31415 China were weak? 😁😆😅🤣😂 read more please
I, too, want to conquer my enemies, but the kitties bro😢😂
This is fake. Valohia never existed. Look on Google and Wikipedia. You won't find Valohia.
OPERATION: MEOW-MEOW
Flaming Feline.
Combustible Kitty
Tomcat torches
😂
😂😂
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂 👌🏽
How agony those cats must have felt when they were brunt alive all of sudden. 😿
They must have been in absolute pain poor kitties
sounds yummy (im asain)
@@muffinman8981shameless
@@muffinman8981tf you I'm asian, gtfo. I'm an asian and none of us ate cats, at least around my countries. There are people who eat dogs tho.
@@ashborne314it's a joke not a d!ck don't take it so hard
And today Mongolia is a nation of less than 3 million people with the overwhelming majority living in tents heated by dried dung. It's the most wretched place on Earth.
The irony is that once you go rock bottom to win at any cost, your descendants will pay the price. And that's exactly what happened. The conquered nations struck back ruthlessly and with an efficiency that would made the Mongols blush. They had set the precedent.
No they didn't struck back dude. Read the history lol. They retreated. His decendants when to conquer even more land in asia and middle eastern reigons. Read the god damn history lol
As a cat lover I had no words but can't expect that era's people to care much about animals mainly kings
People cared plenty for their animals back then, even cats. Ancient Egyptians revered cats so much that they would mummify them when they died, a custom most often reserved for nobility.
But cruel people have been around since before the dawn of civilization, and they have been as cruel then as they are now.
@@MaxxterDM yeaa
You think a person who eats human meat would care about a cat? Lmao
Poor little cats.This makes me want to go outside and hug a stray cat.T_T
trust me you don't want to do that
@@El9endilo I pet strays all the time. They deserve love they control the pest population. Without them life would be harder for us. Just wash your hands after and nothing but will happen.
@@florenmage nah i mean hugging a stray cat is a no go
@@El9endilo pet them then. Thank a stray cat for eating the rat you didn’t have to worry about.
And get rabies?
I see Olga of Kiev and Genghis Khan had similar notions about how to bring a city to it's knees 😂
I scrolled way too long to find this comment.
I can't find anything about Genghis khan doing that. I am starting to think chatGPT ripped off Olga's story and retold it with different decorations and props
@@MrOwl-lw3xc I got the same feeling, it's just too similar. Misinformation has become way too easy!
Remember: False surrender wasn't considerated a warcrime back then
there was no false surrender, it was a false truce
I was expecting the story to be about rat infestation due to the lack of cats but sure this works too 😂
Was expecting the same 😂
I was expecting a "as soon as they gave them the cats he had the people killed and stormed the city"
Me too
Why tho? it would take a month at best to get into that state. Waste of time.
@@Kisamon you’d stave the city and some would die off from unsanitary living and spread of disease. That way he would even save his army from any depletion.
Bro strategizes like an evil doofenshmirtz lmao
Had this guy lived now he'd 100% certainly rule the world.
with the current technology and all that..idk thoo
@@paogougunchongloi6814 he used burning cats to invade a city. What could he not do with modern technology?
@@antonhallergren588maybe he would do 2 or 3x times more than Hitler did
@@battsengelsunjidmaa553 you mean Stalin and Mao? Nah it'd probably have been worse.
Depending on his family connection in the current world.
He probably end up in prison if he was unlucky.
Miracle won't happen twice.
Mongolia than:- 😈👹☠️
Mongolia now:- 🥱🕊️
Genghis Khan: "Legally, it's questionable. Morally, it's disgusting. Personally.. *I like it.* "
Genghis Khan: “how bad can I be?”
The more I hear about this man the more I realize how extremely evil he was
Well you can't conquer half the world with good intentions and "honorable" combat. There is a price to pay and that is losing almost any sense of morality and empathy.
His people praised him as a genius. It's funny how history continues to repeat itself even now.
He is the greatest man in human history
@@zouH2807 😐
@@lordhelmchen3154well alexander the great did
As Mongolian
We still betray enemys in pubg☠️
Psychopaths will always rule, this was ruthlessly brilliant
No, psychopaths don’t dont always rule. Righteous people also rule
@@2mjz84go back to Disney movies
@@EvenMoreCheeseRoosevelt was ok i guess
@@EvenMoreCheesepsychopaths rarely rule for long just look at Nero or Caligula, Genghis khan was cruel but he was no psychopath.
@@EvenMoreCheeseIt's youtube bro, no need to act tough
Bruh the cat had a painful day 😂
Even Kim Jong Un isn’t that evil
Nah ur like a bot
It’s not that he's not that evil. He's just too stupid.
Kim Jung Un is just as evil as Genghis Khan, he ordered the killing of all dogs in entire North Korea
Yes he is
He forced his Population to eat their Dogs. He sended Soldiers to kill the Dogs and people must eat their dogs.
"nesting birds and well fed cats always return home" genghis khan
Genghis Khan never fails to impress me. Just yesterday I watched a short about how he conquered using his daughters and now a 1000 cats
Dude I just did the same
Same
Same
I guess we all watched😂
Wait, he set his Daughters on fire so they would burn the Citys of his Enemys?
Damm thats cruel.
As brutal as this is you have to give him credit for coming up with these insane war strategies.
You have to be cruel in war.
yes same with hitler
I believe there was someone that lived before him that used this tactic, named Olga of Kiev
There's a great strategist and economist of India named Chalukya who used similar tactic.
He himself wasn't a king but the king he assessed become one of the greatest emperor of ancient India.
@SC-148Holocaust wasn't effective at all, it achieves nothing. They just killed a lot of brilliant people who could help to build Germany further.
This is like how samson tied a bunch of foxes together by their tails, lit them on fire and then released them into the barley fields
Yes.
Using animals to burn people's property in order to bring them to submission must have been a common battle tactic back then.
Ghenghis Khan once said he is the punishment of God on people for there sins.
"Your mistake was believing I'd actually agree to peace"
- Genghis Khan, probably -
Pacta sunt servanda.
While it's easy to win fights by breaking the rules/your word, it becomes increasingly difficult to secure peace and stabilty if everyone expects you to.
Whenever i hear about genghis khan part of me squirms at the brutality but part of me still thinks he was probably the most cunning man of his time
*of all time
God damn, dude was ruthless.
Some people are strong,some are clever, some are crazy (reckless), some are greedy and some are cruel. Genghis Khan was somehow everything at once ,rarest of the rare DNA!!!
Lmao he was insanely smart
Rat
And ruthless
Exactly
He wasn't the first to do this...but whatever
@@-VORwho was?
He was so clever, smart & cruel at the same time. No wonder he conquered half of world's land.
You mean half of Asia not the world
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804might as well be the world cause of the time period
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804Half the world cuz he got a huge chunk of Europe.
@@FleshBrain He controlled 0% of South and North America, 0% of Africa, Japan, and all South Pacific, India, and most of Europe except Russia and Ukraine were not controlled by him. It was less than 20%
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 i guess you are not familiar with the quote "i am god's punishment"
Would’ve thought he’d just take the cats so the city became infested with rats, but that’s even more brutal
actually, not more brutal. but yes, brutal
genghis khan should have unleashed the rats than burn cats. but what else can be expected from genghis khan
Deep
me too
he was too chungus to think like a human being
Nobody talks how the Egyptians were defeated because their enemy’s tied cats to their shield
He wasn’t any more evil than other rulers, kings, lords and chieftains of his time. He just better than them all at one job.
Exactly, look at Catholicism, enough said.
He did a lot of damage, though. He destroyed existing power structures, leading to all kinds of civil unrest and resets after he died. The Golden Age of Islam, when the Middle East was an economic, scientific, and mathematical powerhouse was broken and replaced with the extremism we see today in many countries. Europeans added to that in the 20th century.
@@markrene6108nigga, what that suppose to mean? Can I read an early life section of John Catholicism’s Wikipedia page or smt?
Well that's really fucked up! Poor kitties
More like poor people.
Edit:
The amount of people believing 1. I must have a dog and 2. since I supposedly have a dog I therefore hate cats is truly astonishing.
@@gilgameshkingofheroes5903I swear dog owners have mental issues, i'm sorry cats don't approach you
@@barackputin
You think I got a dog?
@@gilgameshkingofheroes5903 yes
@@barackputin
And why is that?
A moment of silence to all the fallen cats who unwillingly gave their lives during this battle
Who said anything about giving their lives? They just had crispy tails. 😬
@@trentmonaghan179 "unwillingly"
@@trentmonaghan179 you have less eq
@@project77977 What is EQ?
@@trentmonaghan179 search on the Internet
Scared animals run back home. The man was an evil genius to ransack a fortified city with just that little bit of insight. Cats fit through very small gaps in the fortifications that humans cannot and they surely used them since cats like to roam so they must have streamed in all at once.
That's cruel as hell. And now nothing he did matters. He lost all in his 1st generation
Props to the cameraman for travelling back in time to take those epic shots of Genghis.
This....🤣🤣
Pretty sure those are just paintings
Yep that's it😂
Traveling back in time was easy. Getting them all to stand still while you paint them - was hard.
😀
“Who let the mews out.”
- Cat Zhu
😅 yoooo
He was truly a genius
When the enemy offers you a gift don't accept no matter how pretty the cat or how strong the Tojan horse looks....gifts are a death sentence
The only walls genghis Khan couldn't penetrate
I think that must have been before he gotten his hands on siege weapons. Ghengis is known for taking enemy weapons and use them for his own strategy. If an enemy he conquered had stuff he did not, they would incorporate it into the next battles. Evolve every fight to be better so to say
I heard the same story about Olga of Kyev when she sieged a sity of Drevlians. But she used pigeons and sparrows instead of cats.
Great minds think alike.
Indeed.
Ever trust your enemy never believe historians
He was the perfect combo and a great meaning of what Conquerer reassembles
ror. Conqueror.
Perfect example of who is going straight to hellfire with no chance of redemption
you never knows about the history of hindus and thier kings lol bro is worshipping the rapist
@@NikoBellaKhouf2yep
@@NikoBellaKhouf2even the Catholic church is going straight to hellfire bruh, all of European monarchs were just like him, he just succeeded more than them
I truly believe Genghis Khan had the 10 Rings
Imagine going through all that and losing so many lives in the battle/fires just to be left with Charcoal City.
The Mongols were a nomadic group so cities don't matter, the usually left the cites that didn't get completely obliterated were left to with one of his daughter.
Do you guys know that his father killed by enemy tribes at non war time. And he was 9 at time. He learned lessons from that day.