In this case disinformation: The modern version of the Hasselblad cost less than 15K and the sensor he is using was released by Hasselblad 7 years ago. Maybe is good to verify the information before giving praise.
teczowyrozowy Yes, I have seen many out-of-camera sample images from a Fuji medium format camera and they are definitely worse than Google's jpgs due to blown out highlights. See www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/3627631444/fujifilm-gfx-50s-samples-from-the-streets-of-tokyo/2333539630
Quoutub You must be kidding me. Bring out the Pixel 2 or any other smartphone and I'll bring my 10yr old Canon 450D and it will blow away the smartphone in every scenario. So, comparing it to the great Fujifilm camera that you talked about is being ridiculous. Smartphones suck at low light photography.
Quoutub a t3i with a vintage cheapo lens would obliterate any smartphone in a low light scenario,let alone a bloody medium format Fuji.Dafuk are you on about?
snapseed is only for mobile. but as until today, even lightroom can't match snapseed on mobile (snapseed also edits all type of RAW from different manufacturer). they are both optimised for different platform. if google does release lightroom-like for PC, they will be way better. believe me. google has tried to put every product everywhere and won.
A Hasselblad like that is for L’Oréal and Gucci shoots, for banners in malls and airports, not Instagram nor even computer screens. To compare the two in that regard is comparing apples to oranges.
The camera sensor is 7 year old, maybe more (the H4D-40 is 7 years old). Of course, it does not cost 20K the new version with a 50mp CMOS sensor costs 15K.
its not just the camera . the VR is so frantastic i did a VR of all the holiday destination it is so real . and the AR is has so much detail u can see shadows of objects to add to pic. google just hit a home run . i am doing so much more on my p2 xl which no other phone can yet do.
This video is fantastic - your quality of the content, and the amount of info you get into these is so much fuller than other similar videos that do the "X versus X" format of video. Really appreciate it!
I've known the Pixel 2 to have one of the best cameras on a smart phone, but I really did not think a smart phone camera would be comparable to professional camera like the Hasselblad. I came across this video with a thought of investing in a Hasselblad, but now you've got me thinking of the Pixel 2. Thank you for that. #interestedinthePixel2
Great job. Fun just to hear what the real differences are. And 128k in 2 days! This one sure "paid" off;) You must have gotten some nice link love. Congrats!
I never have spend a lot of money on phones..... But ur detailed vlogs are really pushing me to buy one especially the Pixel 2 XL.... Ur doing a great work....
I always thought mobile phone cameras are going to take the place of DSLR/mirrorless cameras until I came across your video. Today I Learnt. Would have been interesting to have a print media comparison to proof that point as well though. Thanks for the new information
Rather than saying it will replace, I guess you showed more of how DSLR and other kinds of professional cameras are still relevant in the fast-moving technological age. I mean, my work sometimes requires me to know resolutions, pixel and printing quality, but you really showed the difference. Guess a professional camera is still required for me to print posters :)
Both cameras are pretty good but remember that Apple we're shamed into admitting that many of their phones images were after a mass of Photoshop and extensive use of additional kit
Very clear and detailed comparison. When I was about 16 I wanted a Hesselbach camera. It didn’t work financially but I’ll be getting an iPhone 12 Pro next month.
What I really like about this video is how it serves as a reminder that we are carrying powerful and useful cameras in our pockets that can serve useful purposes. Our phones will never "replace" larger format cameras but, as the old saying goes, the best camera is the one you have with you and our phone cameras can serve as valuable additions to our toolbox. Great content!
I love this content. Could you have a look at a GoPro Hero 5 or 6? I’d be interested to see what a professional cinematographer would think of such a different camera that are now being used for similar shots as professional video cameras! I really enjoy this content so keep it up!
thats why i said professionals, dude. but pixel 2 is a steal for the price compared to iphone x
7 ปีที่แล้ว
Lucky Never True, I still prefer an S8, I wouldn't stand the pixels horrible screen, and yeah but people don't buy Iphones for their cameras, they do it because of their closed ecosystem and/or because they're a popular and/or to look like they're a part of a specific social class
I am using s8 myself but I think Pixel 3 will be my next upgrade. Google is still a startup in smartphone when compared to samsung and apple. i also used iPhone 1st gen until iPhone 5, left after Steve Jobs no longer the ceo. Apple nowadays is a luxury company with lots of cash and they will no longer be the leader of future.
7 ปีที่แล้ว
Lucky Never True, but Google doesn't make their own phones, LG and Huawei do, and all LG phones have had problems, ever since the G2-G6, to the Nexus 5, the 5x, V10, V20, bootloop galore, first generation pixels were full of problems, this second generation has a horrible screen, no headphone jack and it's just a matter of time until they start bootlooping too
I think blue tint screen is acceptable, my s8 also got this problem. and yes LG is only a temp solution for Google. Samsung does have the best screen currently but in the future you never gonna know. i have a very good feeling about Pixel and they will replace Apple as best selling smartphone in the future. AI is the key of their devices
Phone cameras aren't anywhere near DSLRs but look how far they have come in just a decade. Give it another 3years and it will be very difficult to distinguish the pics taken from the two, especially for low end DSLRs and flagship phones. cameras. Can't wait to see what the pixel phones bring to the table in the future.
One thing I've noticed between my dslr and pixel is that w8th the dslr you obviously want to avoid the harsh midday sun. However with the phone camera and tiny sensor it absolutely thrives in these conditions with all the extra light it can get in. In fact if these pictures were taken outside midday I'm sure the difference would have been even smaller.
You are comparing a very old Hasselblad Camera that does not cost 20K not even as a joke. The 40mpixels sensor in that camera is a CCD and it's as old, in thenology terms as my Granma in human terms. I believe that this video is unintentionaly missleading.
I totally hear your criticism that it’s the latest phone compared to an older Hasselblad, but do you think that the newer CMOS cameras would have changed any of the commentary I had about the image quality? The goal was to give photographers that currently only use their phone an idea of how their camera can and can’t compete with pro gear
oh yeah Tyler the new gen CMOS medium format sensor is a leap in term of dynamic range and high iso performances and most of these sensor from Sony are isoinvariant so you will get the most benefit in raw, i am a camera tech enthusiast and i follow these kind of things closely. reading the comments, i feel you will need to add situation when there are huge different in performance when comparing cellphone and larger sensor camera otherwise people won't have any ideas or appreciate of why pro cameras are expensive for example is when the Hassie is at its full potential. The pixel2 is already at its full potential in this video (good light, non mix whitebalance, non moving object) 1. outdoor nightshoot, cityscape for example 2. outdoor or non studio situational shoot in general, good light bad light 3. versatility of changing lenses, for example what would happened when the Hassie use better lenses. 4. Raw, the versatility of isoinvariant sensor, pull & push process comparing to cellphone raw. 5. Print
Regardless of the Hasselblad model, it should beat a smartphone and did. The fact that's the pixel 2 can hang with a older model professional camera says something about the pixel 2. Thanks Tyler for justify my purchase of the pixel 2. I am no professional but I am the designated camera picture person at this years Thanksgiving and Christmas.
1. it should be compared to newer version of Hasselblad because it's not longer $20k anymore, the title should be Google Pixel 2 Camera Test vs. $5k Hasselblad, the new version x1d is even at $7k... body only 2. the pixel2 can hang with medium format camera when in it's good light, in controlled environment, how will it fare in the wild? in environment you need to use iso above 800? This test only give viewer the surface, if the viewers doesn't research more it can misslead people. "What do you need $4k camera for? my phone can do almost the same hurr durr"
KTAC1 Because its a controled studio enviorment.Blads are used mostly for printing due to their huge sensor,if you tried to print an image that is larger than 5"x9" on a pixel it would look horrid.A pro camera is meant only for pro use,imagine the diference in night photography,or wildlife.Its a stupid video not only because its missleading(that Blad costs under 4k and is an old camera) but because they havent pointed out why pro cameras are used.
There's only two instances when the portrait mode fooled me. That was the note8 because the blur intensity is adjustable and by lowering the intensity it looked much more realistic
great video. the thing i find is that i don't find smartphones inspiring i just find shooting a camera has something to it that a smartphone never could transpose
the biggest difference imho is composition. All the hasselblad pictures are much better composed. For example with the digital bokeh, when you go over her face, you see her hair interrupt her chin. Whereas the hasselblad has a clear outline of her hair that tells you, she doesn't have weird growths coming from her face :P Of course the dynamic range and sharpness is there, but I find that the angles of the photos makes it hard to really compare what you get.
Just subscribed, glad to see a fellow veteran iStocker/Getty doing such a cool Vlog will watch very often! Pixel 2 is a big leap forward but there is no substitute for real sensor size and lens bokeh just yet. For online snaps that is another thing entirely, for print not close.
At the end of the day you get what you pay for. Most people don't blow up their shots to 100% and therefore don't need a 'medium' format camera. And generally speaking most people can't tell the difference between an average shot and a great one anyway. Photography has become an undervalued art because of the proliferation of phone cameras and apps like Instagram.
you did forget one point, Hasselblad's files are worked on, in the Phocus software (modern H4/5/6D's) and the Flexicolor software (ixpress {H1}/H2); because the distortion/CA/Vignetting is removed by these, and corrected lens data is used to improve the image as well as the phone!! Also remember that the H series is limited in iso, at least the early ones to ~ 800 or so, as the noise in these CCD not CMOS sensors is problematic, as seen in other youtube videos, aka it is like 1250 iso on a Nikon D700, not YUK, like a woolen hand knit rug!!, or an impressionist painting, but you might know this, and have tested at base iso for both systems, 100/200 for each, or maybe 50 for the H6.
informative & objective comparison =) Please do a camera comparison for the flagships of 2017? Phones like Pixel 2, iPhone X, note 8 and the mate 10 pro (with its leica lens)! Seen other youtubers' comparisons but would love your take as it seems that you have done more in-depth camera reviews =)
Great comparison. The google phone has a 20mp cam right? I mean you can’t go wrong with a hasselblad but I get it. Well done. I’m on the fence on getting a new phone so this was helpful.
Gave a like for the comment at the end. Cell phones have made giant leaps in just the last 10 years, but until dslrs receive calls, they will never replace a dedicated professional camera.
Great video! I'm thinking about replacing my 6P with the Pixel 2 XL. Seeing pros compare cameras is a big help. Nice giveaway too, maybe you can do what Santa could not.
What I'm really interested in is: how much do you have to spend on a dedicated camera to beat the pixel 2s? (I know many aspects of almost any dedicated camera can't be beaten by a smartphone, but I'm more interested in the scenario of casual photos)
That is not how far you have to go to beat smartphones. This test for a Hasselblad was like asking an Olympic Hurdler to jump over a matchbox. Making images the size of a stamp was not what medium format cameras are designed for. Let’s make some 60x40 inch prints and see how the phone compares. The quick answer is it won’t.
If you want to take full advantage of a smartphone camera, you should take the photograph using software like lightroom for android. Lightroom let's you capture and edit the raw output of the sensor (*.dng format)and the result are way better than google hdr+. Then, you can compare to Hasselblad.
the biggest improvement a smartphone camera can make from previous generation is samsung galaxy S7. remember when s6 came out and iphone, lg, htc was still competing ? s7 came out with first dual pixel on smartphone, and led the competition by miles. then every company started implementing dual pixel and it's a crowded competition again.
A wise photographer told me that if your camera is limited, then try to understand your camera's greatest strength and play into that instead of trying to take just what you think is "generally cool looking" shot.
So, it happens that with an average screen today,which might be a full HD LCD screen, you simply won't be able to see how much better the image from a DSRL is compared to a cellphone camera. Matter of fact , have you ever tried to print an image from cellphone camera ? Resolution on the printed image gets prettier poor, and it's in that aspect that DSRLs show their potential.
Why would you need 40 Megapixels if an 4k screen in just about 10 Megapixels ? The answer: printing images. Printed images have immensely greater resolution than any screen, besides even in a screen, DSRl is just that little bit better the common use might not care, but the professional will.
This is just my opinion, but I feel that "pro" phone cameras are almost like an oxymoron now. Because they now offer a level of quality absolutely no one is asking for, _except_ those who are either pro already or aspiring pro's. In both cases they will not be using a phone anyway. So basically this: Phones now cost twice of what they should, because the manufactures are trying to compete where they can't, over customers who are not interested. *_Fantastic!_*
The megapixel count of a camera doesn't matter if the lens is limiting it's capabilities. A 16 MP camera with a good lens will produce way better results than a 24 MP camera with a really bad lens.
Would be interesting to see a comparison to a DSLR which has about the same price point and same amount of Megapixel. To have a more fair comparison. I am a iPhone user - but the Pixel camera is really awesome! I have to say 👏🏻 And great video!
Very excellent review. It really made me rethink, will smartphone ever replace DLSR. But from the beginning they play different output size. Imagine 6 inch square smartphone' screen vs big billboard om the road. They're differ too much yo.
Watch in 144p for the best experience.
Why
@@faiyazhasan8619 for the best experience
@@denvercarbonel8081 😂
I only watch 8k.
Lost it:D
Hasselblad cameras make me feel things that I never felt before...
nmnoz like being broke
Just imagine what you'd feel if you played with a Phase One :).
Dexter 12 X lmao
Anal probing?
Dexter 12 X That would be funny if I hadn't felt broke before
please next video about bicycle vs f22 raptor
I was thinking I might do 🍎 vs 🍊
Film Fanatic LOLOLOLLLLL THATS HILARIOUS !! 😂😂😂😂
Hahaha
Man that made me laugh!😂
Good one! Also a good video, this one.
As a Pixel 2 XL user and Hasselblad lover, this is a great video!
Danni Sims how do you like your pixel 2 XL?
Danni Sims the ghufhij
Tyler, you bring something really unique to the TH-cam community. Keep doing what you're doing!
Thanks! I’m hoping to double down on it this year
In this case disinformation: The modern version of the Hasselblad cost less than 15K and the sensor he is using was released by Hasselblad 7 years ago. Maybe is good to verify the information before giving praise.
red hair
Pixel 2 is the winner because that camera can't call but pixel can 😂😂😂
Not jet :)
Its a camera test not a call test
This comparison is lacking. Besides obvious result, it lacks night shots, and other camera challenging scenarios
teczowyrozowy Yes, I have seen many out-of-camera sample images from a Fuji medium format camera and they are definitely worse than Google's jpgs due to blown out highlights. See www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/3627631444/fujifilm-gfx-50s-samples-from-the-streets-of-tokyo/2333539630
Yeah, this, Even with studio lighting the hasselblad is well above the pixel. In night shots, it wouldn't even be a fair comparison.
Quoutub You must be kidding me. Bring out the Pixel 2 or any other smartphone and I'll bring my 10yr old Canon 450D and it will blow away the smartphone in every scenario. So, comparing it to the great Fujifilm camera that you talked about is being ridiculous. Smartphones suck at low light photography.
Quoutub a t3i with a vintage cheapo lens would obliterate any smartphone in a low light scenario,let alone a bloody medium format Fuji.Dafuk are you on about?
teczowyrozowy because night time photography isn't anywhere near DSLRs yet. Maybe in 2-3 years it will get there.
Wonder what would happen if google made a Lightroom competitor.
Tom Wright did you check out Google's Snapseed app? It comes pretty close to Lightroom!
Ramjee Nithin Krishna Sepuri it’s no where near. Snapseed is a great mobile app. Lightroom is a DAM system, raw editor and so much more.
Tom Wright, agreed you won't get those features. But snapseed also edits RAW images.
snapseed is only for mobile. but as until today, even lightroom can't match snapseed on mobile (snapseed also edits all type of RAW from different manufacturer). they are both optimised for different platform.
if google does release lightroom-like for PC, they will be way better. believe me. google has tried to put every product everywhere and won.
they did n it failed. its a freeware now in google.
Premium content. Next level goodness. That Google Pixel is scary good. The Hasselblad would be a blast to work with.
Oh man, I love the Style how your doing your videos, stoked to see more in the future!
"stoked", the 90s called, they want their jargon back my guy
bruh, sorry.
I'm from Germany, 15 years old and I'm still learning English...
3 years later, One plus was having collaboration with this hasslebad thingy worth 40k dollars. Woaw.
A Hasselblad like that is for L’Oréal and Gucci shoots, for banners in malls and airports, not Instagram nor even computer screens. To compare the two in that regard is comparing apples to oranges.
Great content Tyler! Always love your videos.
The camera sensor is 7 year old, maybe more (the H4D-40 is 7 years old). Of course, it does not cost 20K the new version with a 50mp CMOS sensor costs 15K.
shut up nerd
For a guy with relatively few subscribers your production quality is insane.
Pixel 2 is really freaking amazing for what a phone can do.
its not just the camera . the VR is so frantastic i did a VR of all the holiday destination it is so real . and the AR is has so much detail u can see shadows of objects to add to pic. google just hit a home run . i am doing so much more on my p2 xl which no other phone can yet do.
This video is fantastic - your quality of the content, and the amount of info you get into these is so much fuller than other similar videos that do the "X versus X" format of video. Really appreciate it!
Your color grading is beautiful!
I've known the Pixel 2 to have one of the best cameras on a smart phone, but I really did not think a smart phone camera would be comparable to professional camera like the Hasselblad. I came across this video with a thought of investing in a Hasselblad, but now you've got me thinking of the Pixel 2. Thank you for that.
#interestedinthePixel2
Got clickbaited, no regrets. Great vid!
Good stuff Tyler! Keep making quality videos and your audience will keep on growing. The time and effort really does show in your production quality.
Thanks Jeremy! Lots of hard work ahead of me this year
The next huge photography youtuber. Calling it.
Great job. Fun just to hear what the real differences are. And 128k in 2 days! This one sure "paid" off;) You must have gotten some nice link love. Congrats!
Thanks Ray! Yes a few kind blogging outlets found the video worth sharing, which is much appreciated
I never have spend a lot of money on phones..... But ur detailed vlogs are really pushing me to buy one especially the Pixel 2 XL.... Ur doing a great work....
I always thought mobile phone cameras are going to take the place of DSLR/mirrorless cameras until I came across your video. Today I Learnt. Would have been interesting to have a print media comparison to proof that point as well though. Thanks for the new information
Then you are exactly this video was meant for 😊 and yes, a print test would really leave the Pixel 2 in the dust
Rather than saying it will replace, I guess you showed more of how DSLR and other kinds of professional cameras are still relevant in the fast-moving technological age. I mean, my work sometimes requires me to know resolutions, pixel and printing quality, but you really showed the difference. Guess a professional camera is still required for me to print posters :)
Came here after seeing a tweet about your video - this was very well put together and a very interesting watch. Worth a sub for sure, great job man! 👊
Both cameras are pretty good but remember that Apple we're shamed into admitting that many of their phones images were after a mass of Photoshop and extensive use of additional kit
all product photography is
Very clear and detailed comparison. When I was about 16 I wanted a Hesselbach camera. It didn’t work financially but I’ll be getting an iPhone 12 Pro next month.
Fun video, nice job man
Thanks Ben, it was a fun one to make! Any excuse to play with an expensive camera
What I really like about this video is how it serves as a reminder that we are carrying powerful and useful cameras in our pockets that can serve useful purposes. Our phones will never "replace" larger format cameras but, as the old saying goes, the best camera is the one you have with you and our phone cameras can serve as valuable additions to our toolbox. Great content!
I love this content. Could you have a look at a GoPro Hero 5 or 6? I’d be interested to see what a professional cinematographer would think of such a different camera that are now being used for similar shots as professional video cameras! I really enjoy this content so keep it up!
You deserve way more attention. Your videos are amazing and unique in style!
for most professionals, Hasselblad. for most consumers, go for Pixel 2.
thats why i said professionals, dude. but pixel 2 is a steal for the price compared to iphone x
Lucky Never True, I still prefer an S8, I wouldn't stand the pixels horrible screen, and yeah but people don't buy Iphones for their cameras, they do it because of their closed ecosystem and/or because they're a popular and/or to look like they're a part of a specific social class
I am using s8 myself but I think Pixel 3 will be my next upgrade. Google is still a startup in smartphone when compared to samsung and apple. i also used iPhone 1st gen until iPhone 5, left after Steve Jobs no longer the ceo. Apple nowadays is a luxury company with lots of cash and they will no longer be the leader of future.
Lucky Never True, but Google doesn't make their own phones, LG and Huawei do, and all LG phones have had problems, ever since the G2-G6, to the Nexus 5, the 5x, V10, V20, bootloop galore, first generation pixels were full of problems, this second generation has a horrible screen, no headphone jack and it's just a matter of time until they start bootlooping too
I think blue tint screen is acceptable, my s8 also got this problem. and yes LG is only a temp solution for Google. Samsung does have the best screen currently but in the future you never gonna know.
i have a very good feeling about Pixel and they will replace Apple as best selling smartphone in the future. AI is the key of their devices
Subbed, I like the last part when it shows the bokeh differentiation from a Hasselblad to a mobile phone.
aesthetically the hasselblad looks like a Panasonic tape camcorder from the 2000's
It’s so amazing to see how far smartphone cameras have come!
Oneplus and Hasselblad...
Great comparison Tyler, keep the great work!
Nice to see a serious youtuber honestly claiming that he too uses clickbait
What’s the use of good content if no one ever watches it
True that
Phone cameras aren't anywhere near DSLRs but look how far they have come in just a decade. Give it another 3years and it will be very difficult to distinguish the pics taken from the two, especially for low end DSLRs and flagship phones. cameras. Can't wait to see what the pixel phones bring to the table in the future.
Wow we are entering a giveaway for a pixel 2 by commenting on a picture taken by the iPhone X
#pixel 2 xl amazing
One thing I've noticed between my dslr and pixel is that w8th the dslr you obviously want to avoid the harsh midday sun. However with the phone camera and tiny sensor it absolutely thrives in these conditions with all the extra light it can get in. In fact if these pictures were taken outside midday I'm sure the difference would have been even smaller.
You are comparing a very old Hasselblad Camera that does not cost 20K not even as a joke. The 40mpixels sensor in that camera is a CCD and it's as old, in thenology terms as my Granma in human terms. I believe that this video is unintentionaly missleading.
I totally hear your criticism that it’s the latest phone compared to an older Hasselblad, but do you think that the newer CMOS cameras would have changed any of the commentary I had about the image quality? The goal was to give photographers that currently only use their phone an idea of how their camera can and can’t compete with pro gear
oh yeah Tyler the new gen CMOS medium format sensor is a leap in term of dynamic range and high iso performances and most of these sensor from Sony are isoinvariant so you will get the most benefit in raw, i am a camera tech enthusiast and i follow these kind of things closely.
reading the comments, i feel you will need to add situation when there are huge different in performance when comparing cellphone and larger sensor camera otherwise people won't have any ideas or appreciate of why pro cameras are expensive for example is when the Hassie is at its full potential. The pixel2 is already at its full potential in this video (good light, non mix whitebalance, non moving object)
1. outdoor nightshoot, cityscape for example
2. outdoor or non studio situational shoot in general, good light bad light
3. versatility of changing lenses, for example what would happened when the Hassie use better lenses.
4. Raw, the versatility of isoinvariant sensor, pull & push process comparing to cellphone raw.
5. Print
Regardless of the Hasselblad model, it should beat a smartphone and did. The fact that's the pixel 2 can hang with a older model professional camera says something about the pixel 2.
Thanks Tyler for justify my purchase of the pixel 2. I am no professional but I am the designated camera picture person at this years Thanksgiving and Christmas.
1. it should be compared to newer version of Hasselblad because it's not longer $20k anymore, the title should be Google Pixel 2 Camera Test vs. $5k Hasselblad, the new version x1d is even at $7k... body only
2. the pixel2 can hang with medium format camera when in it's good light, in controlled environment, how will it fare in the wild? in environment you need to use iso above 800?
This test only give viewer the surface, if the viewers doesn't research more it can misslead people. "What do you need $4k camera for? my phone can do almost the same hurr durr"
Jaime Duncan it's a proof of concept
the focus problem on Hassel is the technique of focus and recompose used by your friend. but I appriciate your impartiality.
I mean, the Pixel 2 is great for selfies. But the pros will stick with mirrored cameras and DSLRs.
James W no shit
GARETH SINCLAIR you'd be surprised at how many people believe the smartphone cameras are comparable
Really awesome stuff! I love the studio and all the plants! The whole concept of merging a photography channel with tech is also 👌👌👌 Don't stop!!!
Honestly, looks pretty close in terms of quality.
KTAC1 Because its a controled studio enviorment.Blads are used mostly for printing due to their huge sensor,if you tried to print an image that is larger than 5"x9" on a pixel it would look horrid.A pro camera is meant only for pro use,imagine the diference in night photography,or wildlife.Its a stupid video not only because its missleading(that Blad costs under 4k and is an old camera) but because they havent pointed out why pro cameras are used.
There's only two instances when the portrait mode fooled me. That was the note8 because the blur intensity is adjustable and by lowering the intensity it looked much more realistic
@aniab is soooo beautiful!
great video. the thing i find is that i don't find smartphones inspiring i just find shooting a camera has something to it that a smartphone never could transpose
Noooo I don't have Instagram so I can't compete in the give away
New Years resolutions get instagram :)
LMAooooooo when I do u better add me back then lol , Happy New year's
That's the most subtle way to announce a giveaway
You look like Lionel Messi
sebin jophy no he doesn't what the hell
Twisted Soul bro not as whole but the Beard and his hairstyle
Twisted Soul ok bro
sebin jophy so the conclusion is ronaldo is better than him
Daniel Ruli Nope
the biggest difference imho is composition. All the hasselblad pictures are much better composed. For example with the digital bokeh, when you go over her face, you see her hair interrupt her chin. Whereas the hasselblad has a clear outline of her hair that tells you, she doesn't have weird growths coming from her face :P
Of course the dynamic range and sharpness is there, but I find that the angles of the photos makes it hard to really compare what you get.
Please give me pixel 2
Great comparison - it’s cool to see what a pixel can do already
Great video! Been looking for a new phone upgrade. Now, I want that Pixel 2!
Just subscribed, glad to see a fellow veteran iStocker/Getty doing such a cool Vlog will watch very often! Pixel 2 is a big leap forward but there is no substitute for real sensor size and lens bokeh just yet. For online snaps that is another thing entirely, for print not close.
At the end of the day you get what you pay for. Most people don't blow up their shots to 100% and therefore don't need a 'medium' format camera. And generally speaking most people can't tell the difference between an average shot and a great one anyway. Photography has become an undervalued art because of the proliferation of phone cameras and apps like Instagram.
You are doing a very good job for the camera and smartphone enthusiasts! Love your videos.
A very interesting comparison.. really makes a strong point for Pixel.. and possible future when the gap is further narrowed down...
I absolutely love your channel. Love the style and quality of your reviews.
you did forget one point, Hasselblad's files are worked on, in the Phocus software (modern H4/5/6D's) and the Flexicolor software (ixpress {H1}/H2); because the distortion/CA/Vignetting is removed by these, and corrected lens data is used to improve the image as well as the phone!! Also remember that the H series is limited in iso, at least the early ones to ~ 800 or so, as the noise in these CCD not CMOS sensors is problematic, as seen in other youtube videos, aka it is like 1250 iso on a Nikon D700, not YUK, like a woolen hand knit rug!!, or an impressionist painting, but you might know this, and have tested at base iso for both systems, 100/200 for each, or maybe 50 for the H6.
You make really nice content man!
Great video Tyler. Loved the honest ending 👍🏼
😉
mate your videography is insane, you deserve 1mil+ subs easy
Appreciate the honesty in the final line.
informative & objective comparison =)
Please do a camera comparison for the flagships of 2017? Phones like Pixel 2, iPhone X, note 8 and the mate 10 pro (with its leica lens)! Seen other youtubers' comparisons but would love your take as it seems that you have done more in-depth camera reviews =)
This comparison was necessary only to shut those people up who think smartphone cameras are as good as DSLR.
Your vids are very clean. Love your style bro
Great comparison. The google phone has a 20mp cam right? I mean you can’t go wrong with a hasselblad but I get it. Well done. I’m on the fence on getting a new phone so this was helpful.
12mp.
Nice! This was insightful despite the unsurprising results.
Gave a like for the comment at the end. Cell phones have made giant leaps in just the last 10 years, but until dslrs receive calls, they will never replace a dedicated professional camera.
Nice and great content. Keep it up Tyler !
I wish there were more tests or challenging scenarios to push the camera to it's peak and test all the small details... I'd love some more explaining
I would have been nice to do proper tests but I just didn’t have the time. There would a lot more to see outdoors
Tyler Stalman but still you covered all the details for the parts you covered.. You're doing great.
Just came across this channel and glad i did! Great content look forward to more videos.
Great video! I'm thinking about replacing my 6P with the Pixel 2 XL. Seeing pros compare cameras is a big help. Nice giveaway too, maybe you can do what Santa could not.
Dude love your smooth transitions
Abdullah Jimmy those jump cuts were rough
To immediately see the difference between cameras, print the pictures.
What I'm really interested in is: how much do you have to spend on a dedicated camera to beat the pixel 2s? (I know many aspects of almost any dedicated camera can't be beaten by a smartphone, but I'm more interested in the scenario of casual photos)
That is not how far you have to go to beat smartphones. This test for a Hasselblad was like asking an Olympic Hurdler to jump over a matchbox. Making images the size of a stamp was not what medium format cameras are designed for. Let’s make some 60x40 inch prints and see how the phone compares. The quick answer is it won’t.
The sole fact that this video was needed is somewhat depressing.
Never thought that a camera would cost 20k. Nice video by the way.
I think it's more to do with the lighting conditions.. Point it into the sun or in a dark room and see how it goes.
I was gonna comment how arbitrary this comparison is.... which is why I loved the quick last line disclaimer you put in there :p!
Great comparison, very informative! You should compare the Pixel 2 with a hot-dog next.
If you want to take full advantage of a smartphone camera, you should take the photograph using software like lightroom for android. Lightroom let's you capture and edit the raw output of the sensor (*.dng format)and the result are way better than google hdr+. Then, you can compare to Hasselblad.
the biggest improvement a smartphone camera can make from previous generation is samsung galaxy S7.
remember when s6 came out and iphone, lg, htc was still competing ?
s7 came out with first dual pixel on smartphone, and led the competition by miles.
then every company started implementing dual pixel and it's a crowded competition again.
A wise photographer told me that if your camera is limited, then try to understand your camera's greatest strength and play into that instead of trying to take just what you think is "generally cool looking" shot.
That’s such an amazing wallpaper that you’ve used on the Pixel 2, it would be great if you could let us use it. BTW, awesome content!
That camera looks straight out of the 90's
Great video. I'm really happy with my Pixel 2. The camera is impressive.
Appreciate your HardWork!
Can’t believe I haven’t come across your channel before - fantastic.
So, it happens that with an average screen today,which might be a full HD LCD screen, you simply won't be able to see how much better the image from a DSRL is compared to a cellphone camera. Matter of fact , have you ever tried to print an image from cellphone camera ? Resolution on the printed image gets prettier poor, and it's in that aspect that DSRLs show their potential.
Why would you need 40 Megapixels if an 4k screen in just about 10 Megapixels ? The answer: printing images. Printed images have immensely greater resolution than any screen, besides even in a screen, DSRl is just that little bit better the common use might not care, but the professional will.
Fantastic video as always
This is just my opinion, but I feel that "pro" phone cameras are almost like an oxymoron now. Because they now offer a level of quality absolutely no one is asking for, _except_ those who are either pro already or aspiring pro's. In both cases they will not be using a phone anyway. So basically this: Phones now cost twice of what they should, because the manufactures are trying to compete where they can't, over customers who are not interested. *_Fantastic!_*
The megapixel count of a camera doesn't matter if the lens is limiting it's capabilities. A 16 MP camera with a good lens will produce way better results than a 24 MP camera with a really bad lens.
Nice informative video, keep up the good work. Happy new year!!!!
Damn did he just "GOT EEEMM" all of us at the end there?
Would be interesting to see a comparison to a DSLR which has about the same price point and same amount of Megapixel.
To have a more fair comparison.
I am a iPhone user - but the Pixel camera is really awesome! I have to say 👏🏻
And great video!
Very excellent review. It really made me rethink, will smartphone ever replace DLSR. But from the beginning they play different output size. Imagine 6 inch square smartphone' screen vs big billboard om the road. They're differ too much yo.